pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29945 · v1 · pith:DEUSTHL2new · submitted 2026-06-29 · ⚛️ physics.med-ph

Prediction of biological radiation effects based on ionization clusters (nanodosimetry)

Hans Rabus This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 04:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.med-ph
keywords nanodosimetryionization clustersradiobiological effectivenessradiation biology modelsnanometric volumesbiological radiation effectsmodel categorization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Models linking nanometric ionization clusters to radiobiological effectiveness fall into three classes by their core rationale.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews methods that connect ionization cluster formation in nanometric volumes to the biological effectiveness of radiation. It groups the models into three categories according to their primary rationale: single-target frequency distributions, synergistic effects from pairs of clusters in separate targets, and derivations based on macroscopic particle fluence across many targets. The review applies consistent terminology to present the models, examines differences such as mechanistic versus correlative aims, and flags remaining open questions. A sympathetic reader would care because this organization clarifies the distinct foundations used to turn nanoscale measurements into predictions of radiation damage.

Core claim

The paper claims that approaches linking ionization clusters in nanometric volumes to radiobiological effectiveness can be categorized into three classes according to the most important model rationale: models using a nanodosimetric weighting factor derived from frequency distributions of ionization clusters in a single target; models accounting for synergistic effects of pairs of ionization clusters formed in different targets; and models accounting for macroscopic situations involving many nanometric targets and deriving radiation quantities from particle fluence. It presents the models with harmonized terminology, discusses further conceptual differences, and identifies key open questions

What carries the argument

Categorization of models by their dominant rationale into single-target cluster frequency distributions, synergistic cluster-pair effects, or macroscopic fluence-based derivations.

Load-bearing premise

The implicit rationales of the reviewed models can be extracted reliably enough to serve as the main basis for placing each model into one of the three classes without the classification process itself creating bias or overlooking hybrids.

What would settle it

Identification of a model whose rationale cannot be assigned primarily to any one of the three classes, or that requires equal weight on elements from more than one class, would show the categorization is incomplete.

read the original abstract

This article reviews approaches that link the formation of ionization clusters in nanometric volumes to radiobiological effectiveness. The corresponding models are presented using harmonized terminology and notation. They are categorized into three classes according to the most important, often implicit model rationale: (a) models that use a nanodosimetric weighting factor for biological effectiveness derived from frequency distributions of ionization clusters in a single target; (b) models that account for the synergistic effects of pairs of ionization clusters formed in different targets; (c) models that account for 'macroscopic' situations involving many nanometric targets and derive radiation quantities from the particle fluence. Further conceptual differences between the models and their underlying assumptions are discussed, such as the fact that some models are mechanistic while others only aim to elucidate correlations. Eventually, an attempt is made to identify the key open questions in this field that still need to be addressed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This review paper examines models linking ionization cluster formation in nanometric volumes to radiobiological effectiveness. It harmonizes terminology and notation across existing approaches and categorizes them into three classes based on primary (often implicit) rationales: (a) single-target frequency distributions yielding nanodosimetric weighting factors, (b) synergistic effects from pairs of clusters in separate targets, and (c) macroscopic fluence-based derivations involving many nanometric targets. The paper further discusses mechanistic versus correlative distinctions and identifies open questions in the field.

Significance. As a structured review, the work offers a harmonized descriptive framework that clarifies conceptual differences among nanodosimetry models without introducing new derivations or predictions. If the three-class categorization reliably captures the models' rationales, it provides a useful reference for comparing approaches and highlighting unresolved issues, potentially aiding progress in connecting nanodosimetric quantities to biological effectiveness.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that models are 'presented using harmonized terminology and notation,' but the manuscript would benefit from an explicit table or appendix listing the original versus harmonized symbols for key quantities (e.g., cluster size distributions or weighting factors) to aid readers consulting the cited primary literature.
  2. Section discussing open questions could be strengthened by indicating which questions are most directly testable with current nanodosimetry experiments versus those requiring new theoretical developments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive review, the clear summary of the manuscript's contributions, and the recommendation to accept. No major comments were provided, so the manuscript requires no changes in response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper presents no derivations or predictions

full rationale

The paper is a review that harmonizes terminology for existing models and proposes a descriptive three-class categorization based on their implicit rationales. No new equations, predictions, or first-principles derivations are advanced; the text explicitly frames itself as discussing prior work and open questions without claiming quantitative outputs that reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations. The classification is presented as a conceptual framework rather than a load-bearing derivation, making circularity analysis inapplicable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; the central claim rests on accurate representation of prior literature rather than new parameters, axioms, or entities. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the paper itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5671 in / 1045 out tokens · 42530 ms · 2026-06-30T04:15:19.837742+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

144 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Nanodosimetry: Principle and Current Status

    Schulte R. Nanodosimetry: Principle and Current Status. AIP Conference Proceedings 2011;1345:249. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3576171

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3576171 2011

  2. [2]

    State of The Art of Instrumentation in Experimental Nanodosimetry

    Bantsar A, Colautti P, Conte V, Hilgers G, Pietrzak M, Pszona S, et al. State of The Art of Instrumentation in Experimental Nanodosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosim 2018;180:177 –81. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx263

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/ncx263 2018

  3. [3]

    Nanodosimetry – on the “tracks” of biological radiation effectiveness

    Rabus H. Nanodosimetry – on the “tracks” of biological radiation effectiveness. Z Med Phys 2020;30:91–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.01.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.01.002 2020

  4. [5]

    Initial Events in the Cellular Effects of Ionizing Radiations: Clustered Damage in DNA

    Goodhead DT. Initial Events in the Cellular Effects of Ionizing Radiations: Clustered Damage in DNA. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1994;65:7 –17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553009414550021

    work page doi:10.1080/09553009414550021 1994

  5. [6]

    Modelling of radiation -induced DNA damage: the early physical and chemical event

    Nikjoo H, O´Neill PO, Terrissol M, Goodhead DT. Modelling of radiation -induced DNA damage: the early physical and chemical event. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1994;66:453–7

    1994

  6. [7]

    Track to the future: historical perspective on the importance of radiation track structure and DNA as a radiobiological target

    Hill MA. Track to the future: historical perspective on the importance of radiation track structure and DNA as a radiobiological target. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2017;94:759–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2017.1387304

    work page doi:10.1080/09553002.2017.1387304 2017

  7. [8]

    A Track Ion Counter

    Pszona S. A Track Ion Counter. Proceedings Fifth Symposium on Microdosimetry, vol. EUR 5452 d -e-f, Luxemburg: Commission of the European Communities; 1975, p. 1107 –22. https://doi.org/http://www.ipj.gov.pl/ p2/PFM/PAPERS/V-Sym-Mic-1975-p1107.pdf

    1975

  8. [9]

    An Approach to Experimental Microdosimetry at the Nanometre Scale

    Pszona S, Gajewski R. An Approach to Experimental Microdosimetry at the Nanometre Scale. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 1994;52:427 –30. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082228

    work page doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082228 1994

  9. [10]

    Ionization measurements in small gas samples by single ion counting

    Shchemelinin S, Breskin A, Chechik R, Pansky A, Colautti P, Conte V, et al. Ionization measurements in small gas samples by single ion counting. Nucl Instrum Meth A 1996;368:859–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(95)00874-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0168-9002(95)00874-8 1996

  10. [11]

    First measurements of ionization clusters on the DNA scale in a wall -less sensitive volume

    Shchemelinin S, Breskin A, Chechik R, Colautti P, Schulte RWM. First measurements of ionization clusters on the DNA scale in a wall -less sensitive volume. Radiat Prot Dosim 1999;82:43–50

    1999

  11. [12]

    A detector for track- nanodosimetry

    De Nardo L, Alkaa A, Khamphan C, Conte V, Colautti P, Ségur P, et al. A detector for track- nanodosimetry. Nucl Instrum Meth A 2002;484:312 –26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168 - 9002(01)01989-1

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168 2002

  12. [13]

    A new method for measuring ion clusters produced by charged particles in nanometre track sections of DNA size

    Pszona S, Kula J, Marjanska S. A new method for measuring ion clusters produced by charged particles in nanometre track sections of DNA size. Nucl Instrum Meth A 2000;447:601–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(99)01191-2. 40

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(99)01191-2 2000

  13. [14]

    Guedes G, et al

    Garty G, Shchemelinin S, Breskin A, Chechik R, Orion I, P. Guedes G, et al. Wall -less Ion- counting Nanodosimetry Applied to Protons. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2002;99:325–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006794

    work page doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006794 2002

  14. [15]

    On the Equivalence of Propane -based Tissue-equivalent Gas and Liquid Water with Respect to the Ionisation -yield Formation by Electrons and a -particles

    Grosswendt B. On the Equivalence of Propane -based Tissue-equivalent Gas and Liquid Water with Respect to the Ionisation -yield Formation by Electrons and a -particles. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2002;99:401 –4. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006818

    work page doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006818 2002

  15. [16]

    Development and application of an optical TPC for charged particle track structure imaging in microdosimetry

    Titt U, Dangendorf V, Großwendt B, Schuhmacher H. Development and application of an optical TPC for charged particle track structure imaging in microdosimetry. Nucl Instrum Meth A 2002;477:536–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)01917-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(01)01917-9 2002

  16. [17]

    Ion -counting nanodosemeter with particle tracking capabilities

    Bashkirov V, Schulte R, Breskin A, Chechik R, Schemelinin S, Garty G, et al. Ion -counting nanodosemeter with particle tracking capabilities. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2006;122:415–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncl470

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl470 2006

  17. [18]

    Characterisation of a track structure imaging detector

    Casiraghi M, Bashkirov VA, Hurley RF, Schulte RW. Characterisation of a track structure imaging detector. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2015;166:223 –7. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv139

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv139 2015

  18. [19]

    Development of a single ion detector for radiation track structure studies

    Vasi F, Casiraghi M, Bashkirov V, Giesen U, Schulte RW. Development of a single ion detector for radiation track structure studies. Journal of Instrumentation 2016;11:C09021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/11/09/c09021

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/11/09/c09021 2016

  19. [20]

    FIRE: A compact nanodosimeter detector based on ion amplification in gas

    Vasi F, Kempf I, Besserer J, Schneider U. FIRE: A compact nanodosimeter detector based on ion amplification in gas. Nucl Instrum Meth A 2021;999:165116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2021.165116

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2021.165116 2021

  20. [21]

    Development and characterization of a compact nanodosimetric detector

    Kempf I, Hoffmann TM, Besserer J, Schneider U. Development and characterization of a compact nanodosimetric detector. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 2025;1075:170337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2025.170337

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2025.170337 2025

  21. [22]

    Basic aspects of photon transport through matter with respect to track structure formation

    Grosswendt B. Basic aspects of photon transport through matter with respect to track structure formation. Radiat Environ Biophys 1999;38:147 –61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004110050151

    work page doi:10.1007/s004110050151 1999

  22. [23]

    The Track Structure of Photons, Electrons and α-Particles from the Point of View of the Formation of Ionization Clusters

    Grosswendt B. The Track Structure of Photons, Electrons and α-Particles from the Point of View of the Formation of Ionization Clusters. In: Kling A, Baräo FJC, Nakagawa M, Távora L, Vaz P, editors. Advanced Monte Carlo for Radiation Physics, Particle Transport Simulation and Applications, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2001, p. 237 –50. h...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18211-2_39 2001

  23. [24]

    Formation of ionization clusters in nanometric structures of propane-based tissue-equivalent gas or liquid water by electrons and α-particles

    Grosswendt B. Formation of ionization clusters in nanometric structures of propane-based tissue-equivalent gas or liquid water by electrons and α-particles. Radiat Environ Biophys 2002;41:103–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-002-0155-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00411-002-0155-6 2002

  24. [25]

    Ionization cross section data of nitrogen, methane, and propane for light ions and electrons and their suitability for use in track structure simulations

    Bug M, Gargioni E, Nettelbeck H, Baek WY, Hilgers G, Rozenfeld A, et al. Ionization cross section data of nitrogen, methane, and propane for light ions and electrons and their suitability for use in track structure simulations. Phys Rev E 2013;88:043308 ( 21p.). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.043308

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.88.043308 2013

  25. [26]

    Monte Carlo track structure for radiation biology and space applications

    Nikjoo H, Uehara S, Khvostunov IG, Cucinotta FA, Wilson WE, Goodhead DT. Monte Carlo track structure for radiation biology and space applications. Physica Medica 2001;17:38 – 44

    2001

  26. [27]

    A Monte Carlo track structure simulation code for the full-slowing- down carbon projectiles of energies 1 keV u –1 –10 MeV u –1 in water

    Liamsuwan T, Nikjoo H. A Monte Carlo track structure simulation code for the full-slowing- down carbon projectiles of energies 1 keV u –1 –10 MeV u –1 in water. Phys Med Biol 2013;58:673–701. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/3/673

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/3/673 2013

  27. [28]

    Track structures, DNA targets and radiation effects in the biophysical Monte Carlo simulation code PARTRAC

    Friedland W, Dingfelder M, Kundrát P, Jacob P. Track structures, DNA targets and radiation effects in the biophysical Monte Carlo simulation code PARTRAC. Mutat Res 2011;711:28–

    2011

  28. [29]

    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.01.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.01.003 2011

  29. [30]

    Simulation of ionisation clusters formed in nanometric volumes of the deoxyribose-substitute tetrahydrofuran

    Bug MU, Baek WY, Rabus H. Simulation of ionisation clusters formed in nanometric volumes of the deoxyribose-substitute tetrahydrofuran. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2012;88:137–42. https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2011.610864. 41

    work page doi:10.3109/09553002.2011.610864 2012

  30. [31]

    The Geant4-DNA project

    Incerti S, Baldacchino G, Bernal M, Capra R, Champion C, Francis Z, et al. The Geant4-DNA project. Int J Model Simul Sci Comput 2010;1:157 –78. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793962310000122

    work page doi:10.1142/s1793962310000122 2010

  31. [32]

    Comparison of GEANT4 very low energy cross section models with experimental data in water

    Incerti S, Ivanchenko A, Karamitros M, Mantero A, Moretto P, Tran HN, et al. Comparison of GEANT4 very low energy cross section models with experimental data in water. Med Phys 2010;37:4692–708. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3476457

    work page doi:10.1118/1.3476457 2010

  32. [33]

    Track structure modeling in liquid water: A review of the Geant4 -DNA very low energy extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit

    Bernal MA, Bordage MC, Brown JMC, Davídková M, Delage E, El Bitar Z, et al. Track structure modeling in liquid water: A review of the Geant4 -DNA very low energy extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. Phys Medica 2015;31:861 –74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.10.087

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.10.087 2015

  33. [34]

    Geant4 ‐DNA example applications for track structure simulations in liquid water: A report from the Geant4‐DNA Project

    Incerti S, Kyriakou I, Bernal MA, Bordage MC, Francis Z, Guatelli S, et al. Geant4 ‐DNA example applications for track structure simulations in liquid water: A report from the Geant4‐DNA Project. Med Phys 2018;45:e722–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13048

    work page doi:10.1002/mp.13048 2018

  34. [35]

    Verification of KURBUC -based ion track structure mode for proton and carbon ions in the PHITS code

    Matsuya Y, Kai T, Sato T, Liamsuwan T, Sasaki K, Nikjoo H. Verification of KURBUC -based ion track structure mode for proton and carbon ions in the PHITS code. Phys Med Biol 2021;66:06NT02. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abe65e

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6560/abe65e 2021

  35. [36]

    Modeling of radiation action based on nanodosimetric event spectra

    Schulte R, Bashkirov V, Shchemelinin S, Garty G, Chechik R, Breskin A. Modeling of radiation action based on nanodosimetric event spectra. Phys Medica 2001;17 Suppl 1:177–80

    2001

  36. [37]

    Ionization detail parameters and cluster dose: a mathematical model for selection of nanodosimetric quantities for use in treatment planning in charged particle radiotherapy

    Faddegon B, Blakely EA, Burigo L, Censor Y, Dokic I, Domínguez Kondo N, et al. Ionization detail parameters and cluster dose: a mathematical model for selection of nanodosimetric quantities for use in treatment planning in charged particle radiotherapy. P hys Med Biol 2023;68:175013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acea16

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6560/acea16 2023

  37. [38]

    Nanodosimetric Results and Radiotherapy Beams: A Clinical Application? Radiation Protection Dosimetry 1997;70:541 –6

    Lindborg L, Grindborg JE. Nanodosimetric Results and Radiotherapy Beams: A Clinical Application? Radiation Protection Dosimetry 1997;70:541 –6. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032013

    work page doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032013 1997

  38. [39]

    Nanodosimetry and RBE values in radiotherapy

    Lindborg L, Hultqvist M, Tedgren \AA Carlsson, Nikjoo H. Nanodosimetry and RBE values in radiotherapy. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2015;166:339 –42. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv196

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv196 2015

  39. [40]

    nanometric

    Grosswendt B, Pszona S. The track structure of alpha -particles from the point of view of ionization-cluster formation in “nanometric” volumes of nitrogen. Radiat Environ Biophys 2002;41:91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-002-0144-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s00411-002-0144-9 2002

  40. [41]

    Recent advances of nanodosimetry

    Grosswendt B. Recent advances of nanodosimetry. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2004;110:789–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nch171

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/nch171 2004

  41. [42]

    Experimental equivalent cluster -size distributions in nanometric volumes of liquid water

    Grosswendt B, De Nardo L, Colautti P, Pszona S, Conte V, Tornielli G. Experimental equivalent cluster -size distributions in nanometric volumes of liquid water. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2004;110:851–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nch203

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/nch203 2004

  42. [43]

    Nanodosimetry, the metrological tool for connecting radiation physics with radiation biology

    Grosswendt B. Nanodosimetry, the metrological tool for connecting radiation physics with radiation biology. Radiat Prot Dosim 2006;122:404 –14. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncl469

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl469 2006

  43. [44]

    Check of the scaling procedure of track structures of ionizing radiation in nanometric volumes

    Hilgers G. Check of the scaling procedure of track structures of ionizing radiation in nanometric volumes. Radiat Meas 2010;45:1228 –32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.06.039

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.06.039 2010

  44. [45]

    Characterisation of the PTB ion counter nanodosimeter’s target volume and its equivalent size in terms of liquid H2O

    Hilgers G, Braunroth T, Rabus H. Characterisation of the PTB ion counter nanodosimeter’s target volume and its equivalent size in terms of liquid H2O. Radiat Phys Chem 2022;191:109862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109862

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109862 2022

  45. [46]

    Track structure characterization and its link to radiobiology

    Conte V, Selva A, Colautti P, Hilgers G, Rabus H. Track structure characterization and its link to radiobiology. Radiat Meas 2017;106:506 –11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Radmeas.2017.06.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.06.010 2017

  46. [47]

    Ionization Detail Parameters for DNA Damage Evaluation in Charged Particle Radiotherapy: Simulation Study Based on Cell Survival Database

    Mietelska M, Pietrzak M, Bancer A, Ruciński A, Szefliński Z, Brzozowska B. Ionization Detail Parameters for DNA Damage Evaluation in Charged Particle Radiotherapy: Simulation Study Based on Cell Survival Database. IJMS 2024;25:5094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105094. 42

    work page doi:10.3390/ijms25105094 2024

  47. [48]

    Nanodosimetry: towards a new concept of radiation quality

    Conte V, Selva A, Colautti P, Hilgers G, Rabus H, Bantsar A, et al. Nanodosimetry: towards a new concept of radiation quality. Radiat Prot Dosim 2018;180:150 –6. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx175

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/ncx175 2018

  48. [49]

    Track structure of light ions: experiments and simulations

    Conte V, Colautti P, Grosswendt B, Moro D, Nardo LD. Track structure of light ions: experiments and simulations. New Journal of Physics 2012;14:093010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093010

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093010 2012

  49. [50]

    Measurement of track structure parameters of low and medium energy helium and carbon ions in nanometric volumes

    Hilgers G, Bug M, Rabus H. Measurement of track structure parameters of low and medium energy helium and carbon ions in nanometric volumes. Phys Med Biol 2017;62:7569–97

    2017

  50. [51]

    On the two modes of nanodosimetric experiment

    Pietrzak M. On the two modes of nanodosimetric experiment. Radiat Prot Dosim 2019;183:187–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncy233

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/ncy233 2019

  51. [52]

    Bueno M, Schulte R, Meylan S, Villagrasa C. Influence of the geometrical detail in the description of DNA and the scoring method of ionization clustering on nanodosimetric parameters of track structure: a Monte Carlo study using Geant4 -DNA. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:8583–99. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/21/8583

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-9155/60/21/8583 2015

  52. [53]

    Fast calculation of nanodosimetric quantities in treatment planning of proton and ion therapy

    Ramos-Méndez J, Burigo LN, Schulte R, Chuang C, Faddegon B. Fast calculation of nanodosimetric quantities in treatment planning of proton and ion therapy. Phys Med Biol 2018;63:235015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aaeeee

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aaeeee 2018

  53. [54]

    Nanodosimetric quantities and RBE of a clinically relevant carbon‐ion beam

    Dai T, Li Q, Liu X, Dai Z, He P, Ma Y, et al. Nanodosimetric quantities and RBE of a clinically relevant carbon‐ion beam. Med Phys 2020;47:772–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13914

    work page doi:10.1002/mp.13914 2020

  54. [55]

    Modified logistic nanodosimetry model for calculating relative biological effectiveness

    Yang J-F, Liu X-G, Zhang H, He P-B, Ma Y-Y, Shen G-S, et al. Modified logistic nanodosimetry model for calculating relative biological effectiveness. NUCL SCI TECH 2025;36:61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-025-01646-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-025-01646-y 2025

  55. [56]

    On a revised concept of an event that allows linking nanodosimetry and microdosimetry in nanometric sites with macroscopic dosimetry

    Rabus H, Thomas L. On a revised concept of an event that allows linking nanodosimetry and microdosimetry in nanometric sites with macroscopic dosimetry. Radiat Phys Chem 2025;232:112640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112640

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112640 2025

  56. [57]

    A Monte Carlo tool for multi-target nanodosimetry

    Selva A, Conte V, Colautti P. A Monte Carlo tool for multi-target nanodosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosim 2018;180:182–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncy027

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/ncy027 2018

  57. [58]

    Three -dimensional nanodosimetric characterisation of proton track structure

    Braunroth T, Nettelbeck H, Ngcezu SA, Rabus H. Three -dimensional nanodosimetric characterisation of proton track structure. Radiat Phys Chem 2020;176:109066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109066

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109066 2020

  58. [59]

    Corrigendum to 'Three -dimensional nanodosimetric characterisation of proton track structure’ [Radiation Physics and Chemistry 176 (2020) 109066]

    Braunroth T, Nettelbeck H, Ngcezu SA, Rabus H. Corrigendum to 'Three -dimensional nanodosimetric characterisation of proton track structure’ [Radiation Physics and Chemistry 176 (2020) 109066]. Radiat Phys Chem 2021;186:109535. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109535

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109535 2020

  59. [60]

    Three -dimensional nanodosimetric characterisation of proton track structure

    Braunroth T, Nettelbeck H, Ngcezu SA, Rabus H. Corrigendum to “Three -dimensional nanodosimetric characterisation of proton track structure”, [Braunroth et al. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 176 (2020) 109066]. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 2025;235:112826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112826

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112826 2020

  60. [61]

    Three -dimensional nanodosimetric characterisation of proton track structure

    Braunroth T, Nettelbeck H, Ngcezu SA, Rabus H. Corrigendum to “Three -dimensional nanodosimetric characterisation of proton track structure” [Radiat. Phys. Chem. 176 109066]. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 2026;247:114009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2026.114009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2026.114009 2026

  61. [62]

    Broadscale

    Rabus H, Ngcezu SA, Braunroth T, Nettelbeck H. “Broadscale” nanodosimetry: Nanodosimetric track structure quantities increase at distal edge of spread -out proton Bragg peaks. Radiat Phys Chem 2020;166:108515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108515

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108515 2020

  62. [63]

    Broadscale

    Rabus H, Ngcezu SA, Braunroth T, Nettelbeck H. Corrigendum to “Broadscale” nanodosimetry: Nanodosimetric track structure quantities increase at distal edge of spread-out proton Bragg peaks [Radiat. Phys. Chem. 166 108515]. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 2026;247:114008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2026.114008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2026.114008 2026

  63. [64]

    Energy imparted and ionisation yield at the nanometre scale: results for extended beams

    Selva A, Bolst D, Bianchi A, Guatelli S, Conte V. Energy imparted and ionisation yield at the nanometre scale: results for extended beams. Radiat Prot Dosim 2023;199:1984 –8. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncac253. 43

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/ncac253 2023

  64. [65]

    Correlated ionisations in two spatially separated nanometric volumes in the track structure of 241Am alpha particles: Measurements with the PTB ion counter

    Hilgers G, Rabus H. Correlated ionisations in two spatially separated nanometric volumes in the track structure of 241Am alpha particles: Measurements with the PTB ion counter. Radiat Phys Chem 2020;176:109025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109025

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109025 2020

  65. [66]

    Correlated ionisations in two spatially separated nanometric volumes within the track structure of 241Am alpha particles: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations

    Hilgers G, Braunroth T, Rabus H. Correlated ionisations in two spatially separated nanometric volumes within the track structure of 241Am alpha particles: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations. Radiat Phys Chem 2022;201:110488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110488

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110488 2022

  66. [67]

    Energy dependent track structure parametrisations for protons and carbon ions based on nanometric simulations

    Alexander F, Villagrasa C, Rabus H, Wilkens J. Energy dependent track structure parametrisations for protons and carbon ions based on nanometric simulations. Eur Phys J D 2015;69:216-1-216–7. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2015-60206-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/e2015-60206-5 2015

  67. [68]

    Nanodosimetry -based plan optimization for particle therapy

    Casiraghi M, Schulte R. Nanodosimetry -based plan optimization for particle therapy. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2015;2015:1 –13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/908971

    work page doi:10.1155/2015/908971 2015

  68. [69]

    Future development of biologically relevant dosimetry

    Palmans H, Rabus H, Belchior A, Bug M, Galer S, Giesen U, et al. Future development of biologically relevant dosimetry. Brit J Radiol 2015;88:20140392. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140392

    work page doi:10.1259/bjr.20140392 2015

  69. [70]

    A model of radiation action based on nanodosimetry and the application to ultra -soft X -rays

    Schneider U, Vasi F, Schmidli K, Besserer J. A model of radiation action based on nanodosimetry and the application to ultra -soft X -rays. Radiat Environ Biophys 2020;59:439–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-020-00842-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00411-020-00842-1 2020

  70. [71]

    High -resolution heavy ion track structure imaging

    Laczko G, Dangendorf V, Kramer M, Schardt D, Tittelmeier K. High -resolution heavy ion track structure imaging. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 2004;535:216 –20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(04)01606-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(04)01606-7 2004

  71. [72]

    Measurements of spatial correlations of ionisation clusters in the track of carbon ions - First results

    Pietrzak M, Pszona S, Bantsar A. Measurements of spatial correlations of ionisation clusters in the track of carbon ions - First results. Radiat Prot Dosim 2018;180:162 –7. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncy079

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/ncy079 2018

  72. [73]

    Nanodosimetric investigation of the track structure of therapeutic carbon ion radiation part 1: measurement of ionization cluster size distributions

    Hilgers G, Schwarze M, Rabus H. Nanodosimetric investigation of the track structure of therapeutic carbon ion radiation part 1: measurement of ionization cluster size distributions. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2024;10:065030. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057 - 1976/ad7bc1

    work page doi:10.1088/2057 2024

  73. [74]

    Nanodosimetric investigation of the track structure of therapeutic carbon ion radiation part2: detailed simulation

    Schwarze M, Hilgers G, Rabus H. Nanodosimetric investigation of the track structure of therapeutic carbon ion radiation part2: detailed simulation. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2025;11:015018. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad9152

    work page doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ad9152 2025

  74. [75]

    Local weighting of nanometric track structure properties in macroscopic voxel geometries for particle beam treatment planning

    Alexander F, Villagrasa C, Rabus H, Wilkens J. Local weighting of nanometric track structure properties in macroscopic voxel geometries for particle beam treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:9145 –56. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031 - 9155/60/23/9145

    work page doi:10.1088/0031 2015

  75. [76]

    Cluster Dose Prediction in Carbon Ion Therapy: Using Transfer Learning from a Pretrained Dose Prediction U-Net

    Schwarze M, Looe HK, Poppe B, Tappayuthpijarn P, Thomas L, Rabus H. Cluster Dose Prediction in Carbon Ion Therapy: Using Transfer Learning from a Pretrained Dose Prediction U-Net. Biom Phys Eng Express 2026;12

    2026

  76. [77]

    Nanodosimetric quantity -weighted dose optimization for carbon -ion treatment planning

    Yang J, Liu X, Zhang H, Dai Z, He P, Ma Y, et al. Nanodosimetric quantity -weighted dose optimization for carbon -ion treatment planning. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024;47:703 –15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01399-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s13246-024-01399-9 2024

  77. [78]

    Nanodosimetry, from radiation physics to radiation biology

    Grosswendt B. Nanodosimetry, from radiation physics to radiation biology. Radiat Prot Dosim 2005;115:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nci152

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/nci152 2005

  78. [79]

    New descriptors of radiation quality based on nanodosimetry, a first approach

    Grosswendt B, Pszona S, Bantsar A. New descriptors of radiation quality based on nanodosimetry, a first approach. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2007;126:432 –44. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncm088

    work page doi:10.1093/rpd/ncm088 2007

  79. [80]

    Monte Carlo Simulation of the Production of Short DNA Fragments by Low -Linear Energy Transfer Radiation Using Higher -Order DNA Models

    Friedland W, Jacob P, Paretzke HG, Stork T. Monte Carlo Simulation of the Production of Short DNA Fragments by Low -Linear Energy Transfer Radiation Using Higher -Order DNA Models. Radiat Res 1998;150:170. https://doi.org/10.2307/3579852. 44

    work page doi:10.2307/3579852 1998

  80. [81]

    Measurement of DNA damage by electrons with energies between 25 and 4000 eV

    Folkard M, Prise KM, Vojnovic B, Davies S, Roper MJ. Measurement of DNA damage by electrons with energies between 25 and 4000 eV. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1993;64:651–8

    1993

Showing first 80 references.