pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30022 · v1 · pith:GW56UUYRnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · 🧮 math.AP

Multiphase formulation of the Vlasov-Navier-Stokes equations

Valentin Lemarie (LAMA) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 05:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords Vlasov-Navier-Stokespressureless Euler-Navier-Stokesmultiphase formulationconvergencekinetic to fluid limitZakharov multiphase framework
0
0 comments X

The pith

Solutions of the Vlasov-Navier-Stokes system converge to the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system via a multiphase formulation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a particular family of solutions to the Vlasov-Navier-Stokes equations on R^d for d at least 2. It shows that these solutions converge to the unique solution of the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system. The analysis is carried out inside Zakharov's multiphase framework applied to an intermediate multiphase pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system, followed by a single-phase limit. This produces a rigorous connection between the original kinetic system and the fluid system, using an existing global existence result for the pressureless system in the small-data regime.

Core claim

We study a particular family of solutions of the Vlasov-Navier-Stokes system and show their convergence to the unique solution of the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system. We place the analysis in a multiphase framework to study the multiphase pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system, then take the single-phase limit to obtain a rigorous link between the Vlasov-Navier-Stokes system and the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system.

What carries the argument

Zakharov's multiphase framework applied to the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system, which enables the single-phase limit that recovers convergence from the Vlasov-Navier-Stokes system.

If this is right

  • The convergence holds whenever the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system possesses a unique solution.
  • The multiphase pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system serves as an intermediate object that connects the kinetic and fluid descriptions.
  • The single-phase limit within the multiphase setting produces the desired rigorous link between the two original systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same multiphase passage could be tested on other kinetic-fluid systems that lack an existing global existence theory.
  • Numerical schemes might be designed to exploit the multiphase intermediate step as a bridge between particle and fluid representations.
  • If global existence for the pressureless system can be obtained beyond small data, the convergence result would extend immediately.

Load-bearing premise

The pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system has a unique global solution in the small-data regime and Zakharov's multiphase framework applies directly to it.

What would settle it

An explicit counterexample in which a Vlasov-Navier-Stokes solution fails to converge to the corresponding pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes solution when the multiphase single-phase limit is taken.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we study a particular family of solutions of the Vlasov-Navier-Stokes system posed on $\mathbb{R}^d$ (with $d\geq 2$), and show their convergence to the unique solution of the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system. A global existence result for the latter system, in the small data regime, was established in \cite{MonENS}. Here we place ourselves in a multiphase framework, introduced and studied by Zakharov in \cite{Zakharov1,Zakharov2}, in order to carry out an analogous analysis for a system that we will call multiphase pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes. We then study the single-phase limit and obtain a rigorous link between the Vlasov-Navier-Stokes system and the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies a particular family of solutions to the Vlasov-Navier-Stokes system on R^d (d≥2) within Zakharov's multiphase framework. It shows convergence of these solutions to the unique solution of the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system in the single-phase limit, relying on the global existence result for the latter in the small-data regime from MonENS.

Significance. If the technical steps hold, the result supplies a rigorous link between the Vlasov-NS and pressureless ENS descriptions via the multiphase ansatz. This would strengthen the connection between kinetic and fluid models in the presence of viscosity, building directly on the cited global-existence theorem.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and multiphase setup (around the definition of the multiphase pressureless ENS)] The central convergence argument places the viscous pressureless ENS into Zakharov's multiphase framework (cited as Zakharov1, Zakharov2) and passes to the single-phase limit. These references predate the viscous NS coupling; the manuscript must therefore derive or adapt the a-priori bounds that close the multiphase kinetic formulation when the viscous dissipation term is present. Without this verification the transfer of the convergence argument is not justified.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the multiphase densities and velocities should be introduced with an explicit comparison table to the single-phase variables to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need to justify the application of Zakharov's multiphase framework in the presence of viscosity. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and multiphase setup (around the definition of the multiphase pressureless ENS)] The central convergence argument places the viscous pressureless ENS into Zakharov's multiphase framework (cited as Zakharov1, Zakharov2) and passes to the single-phase limit. These references predate the viscous NS coupling; the manuscript must therefore derive or adapt the a-priori bounds that close the multiphase kinetic formulation when the viscous dissipation term is present. Without this verification the transfer of the convergence argument is not justified.

    Authors: We agree that Zakharov's original works predate the viscous Navier-Stokes coupling. In the revised version we will add an explicit derivation of the a-priori bounds for the multiphase pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system. The viscous dissipation term supplies additional L^2 control on the velocity field that strengthens rather than weakens the estimates; the adaptation consists of inserting the standard viscous energy dissipation into the moment estimates already present in Zakharov1 and Zakharov2 and verifying that the resulting Gronwall-type inequalities remain closed under the small-data assumption inherited from MonENS. This new subsection will be placed immediately after the definition of the multiphase system. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external citations for base results.

full rationale

The paper cites independent prior works [MonENS] for global existence/uniqueness of the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system in the small-data regime and [Zakharov1,Zakharov2] for the multiphase framework. It then defines a multiphase pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system and performs an analogous analysis to obtain the single-phase limit linking to Vlasov-Navier-Stokes solutions. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's own equations or self-citation to its inputs by construction; the convergence argument is presented as derived from the system equations within the adopted framework rather than tautological. The multiphase setup is introduced in the paper but does not render the final link equivalent to the cited inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on prior existence results and the multiphase framework; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Global existence and uniqueness for the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system holds in the small data regime
    Cited from MonENS and used as the target system
  • domain assumption Zakharov's multiphase framework can be applied to the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system
    Invoked to carry out the analysis for the multiphase version

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5668 in / 1314 out tokens · 49911 ms · 2026-06-30T05:38:07.570242+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Baradat: Nonlinear instability in Vlasov type equations around rough velocity profiles, Ann

    A. Baradat: Nonlinear instability in Vlasov type equations around rough velocity profiles, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire37 (2020), no. 3, 489–547

    2020

  2. [2]

    Han-Kwan: Multiphasic formulation of Vlasov equations and applications, in preparation

    A.Baradat, L.Ertzbischoff and D. Han-Kwan: Multiphasic formulation of Vlasov equations and applications, in preparation

  3. [3]

    Bahouri, J.-Y

    H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin and R. Danchin: Fourier Analysis and Nonlinear Par- tial Differential Equations,Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 343, Springer, 2011. 28 V ALENTIN LEMARIÉ

    2011

  4. [4]

    Boudin, L

    L. Boudin, L. Desvillettes, C. Grandmont and A. Moussa:Global existence of solu- tions for the coupled Vlasov and Navier-Stokes equations, Differential Integral Equa- tions, 22(11-12), (2009), 1247–1271

    2009

  5. [5]

    Boudin, C

    L. Boudin, C. Grandmont, B. Grec, S. Martin, A. Mecherbet, and F. Noël:Fluid- kinetic modelling for respiratory aerosols with variable size and temperatureESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, 67:100–119, 2020

    2020

  6. [6]

    Boudin, C

    L. Boudin, C. Grandmont, A. Lorz, and A. Moussa: Modelling and numerics for respiratory aerosols, Commun. Comput. Phys., 18(3):723–756, 2015

    2015

  7. [7]

    Boudin and D

    L. Boudin and D. Michel: Three-dimensional numerical study of a fluid-kinetic model for respiratory aerosols with variable size and temperature, J. Comput. Theor. Transp., 50(5):507–527, 2021

    2021

  8. [8]

    Caflisch and G

    R. Caflisch and G. C. Papanicolaou,Dynamic theory of suspensions with Brownian effects, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 43(4):885–906, 1983

    1983

  9. [9]

    Y.-P. Choi, J. Jung and J. Kim:A revisit to the pressureless Euler–Navier-Stokes system in the whole space and its optimal temporal decay, J. Differential Equations 401 (2024), 231–281

    2024

  10. [10]

    Danchin:An elementary approach to the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system, Kinetic and Related Model, to appear, Arch

    R. Danchin:An elementary approach to the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system, Kinetic and Related Model, to appear, Arch. Ration. Mech. and Analysis

  11. [11]

    Danchin: Fujita-Kato solutions and optimal time decay for the Vlasov-Navier- Stokes system in the whole space, pre-publication arXiv:2405.09937

    R. Danchin: Fujita-Kato solutions and optimal time decay for the Vlasov-Navier- Stokes system in the whole space, pre-publication arXiv:2405.09937

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Danchin:Partially dissipative systems in the critical regularity setting, and strong relaxation limit, EMS Surv

    R. Danchin:Partially dissipative systems in the critical regularity setting, and strong relaxation limit, EMS Surv. Math. Sci.9 (2022), no. 1, 135–192

    2022

  13. [13]

    Desvillettes: Some aspects of the modeling at different scales of multiphase flows, Comput

    L. Desvillettes: Some aspects of the modeling at different scales of multiphase flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.199 (2010), no. 21-22, 1265–1267

    2010

  14. [14]

    Ertzbischoff: Global derivation of a Boussinesq-Navier-Stokes type system from fluid-kinetic equations, Ann

    L. Ertzbischoff: Global derivation of a Boussinesq-Navier-Stokes type system from fluid-kinetic equations, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6)33 (2024), no. 4, 1059– 1154

    2024

  15. [15]

    Goudon, P.-E

    T. Goudon, P.-E. Jabin, and A. Vasseur: Hydrodynamic limit for the Vlasov–Navier–Stokes equations: I. Light particles regime, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 53, (2004), 1495–1515

    2004

  16. [16]

    Goudon, P.-E

    T. Goudon, P.-E. Jabin, and A. Vasseur: Hydrodynamic limit for the Vlasov–Navier–Stokes equations: II. Fine particles regime, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 53, (2004), 1517–1536

    2004

  17. [17]

    Grenier: Oscillations in quasineutral plasmas, Comm

    E. Grenier: Oscillations in quasineutral plasmas, Comm. Partial Differential Equa- tions 21 (1996), no. 3-4, 363–394

    1996

  18. [18]

    Han-Kwan: Large time behavior of small-data solutions to the Vlasov-Navier- Stokes system on the whole space, ProbabilityandMathematicalPhysics, 3(1), (2022), 35–67

    D. Han-Kwan: Large time behavior of small-data solutions to the Vlasov-Navier- Stokes system on the whole space, ProbabilityandMathematicalPhysics, 3(1), (2022), 35–67

    2022

  19. [19]

    D.Han-Kwan and D.Michel: On hydrodynamic limits of the Vlasov-Navier-Stokes system, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.302 (2024), no. 1516, v+115 pp

    2024

  20. [20]

    Han-Kwan, A

    D. Han-Kwan, A. Moussa and I. Moyano:Large time behavior of the Vlasov-Navier- Stokes system on the torus, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.236 (2020), no. 3, 1273–1323

    2020

  21. [21]

    Huang, H.Tang, G.Wu and W.Zou:Global well-posedness and large-time behavior of classical solutions to the Euler-Navier-Stokes system inR3, J

    F. Huang, H.Tang, G.Wu and W.Zou:Global well-posedness and large-time behavior of classical solutions to the Euler-Navier-Stokes system inR3, J. Differential Equa- tions 410 (2024), 76–112

    2024

  22. [22]

    The Pressureless Euler--Navier--Stokes System

    V. Lemarié: The pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes system , pre-publication arXiv:2505.17577

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Moussa:Étude mathématique et numérique du transport d’aérosols dans le poumon humain, PhD thesis, École normale supérieure de Cachan-ENS Cachan, 2009

    A. Moussa:Étude mathématique et numérique du transport d’aérosols dans le poumon humain, PhD thesis, École normale supérieure de Cachan-ENS Cachan, 2009

    2009

  24. [24]

    P.J.O’Rourke: Collective drop effects on vaporizing liquid sprays, PhdThesisPrince- ton University, 1981

    1981

  25. [25]

    Zhai et al.:Optimal well-posedness for the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes sys- tem, J

    X. Zhai et al.:Optimal well-posedness for the pressureless Euler-Navier-Stokes sys- tem, J. Math. Phys.64 (2023), no. 5, Paper No. 051506, 13 pp. SYSTÈME D’EULER-NA VIER-STOKES 29

    2023

  26. [26]

    Zakharov: Benney equations and quasiclassical approximation in the inverse problem method, Funktsional

    V.E. Zakharov: Benney equations and quasiclassical approximation in the inverse problem method, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen.14 (1980), no. 2, 15–24

    1980

  27. [27]

    Zakharov: On the Benney equations, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 3(1- 2):193–202, 1981

    V.E. Zakharov: On the Benney equations, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 3(1- 2):193–202, 1981

    1981