pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31477 · v1 · pith:URZCOSXUnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Multi-wavelength Emission Modeling from Accretion Flows around Isolated Black Holes Including Magnetic Flux Transport

Takumi Koshimizu , Shigeo S. Kimura This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords isolated black holesaccretion disksmagnetic Prandtl numbermagnetically arrested disksmulti-wavelength emissioninfrared emissionX-ray emission
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic flux transport controls whether isolated black holes form magnetically arrested disks emitting detectable infrared and X-rays

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models emission from gas accreting onto isolated stellar-mass black holes with a one-dimensional framework that tracks magnetic flux transport governed by the magnetic Prandtl number. It establishes that magnetically arrested disks form for Prandtl numbers at or above one, allowing outer disk regions near 100 gravitational radii to radiate infrared light visible to WISE. X-ray output is nonthermal at Pm equal to one but shifts to inverse-Compton dominance at 0.5, so only higher values permit plausible X-ray detection inside dense molecular-cloud filaments. This goes beyond one-zone approximations by capturing how radial structure and magnetic physics together set observable signatures. A sympathetic reader cares because isolated black holes are expected to be common in the Milky Way yet remain mostly undetected.

Core claim

Isolated stellar-mass black holes accrete from molecular clouds and form disks in which magnetic flux transport, parameterized by the magnetic Prandtl number Pm, decides whether magnetically arrested disks form for Pm greater than or equal to 1 with magnetic flux at saturation. Outer disk parts around 100 gravitational radii then emit infrared photons detectable by WISE. X-ray emission is nonthermal for Pm=1 and inverse-Compton dominated for Pm=0.5, making X-ray detection plausible in dense filaments for Pm at least 1. Magnetic flux transport therefore shapes the multiwavelength observational signatures of these black holes.

What carries the argument

The 1D radial accretion disk model that incorporates magnetic flux transport controlled by the magnetic Prandtl number Pm, which sets whether the disk reaches magnetic flux saturation and determines the resulting infrared and X-ray emission properties.

If this is right

  • Magnetically arrested disks form for Pm ≳ 1 where magnetic flux reaches saturation.
  • Outer disk regions at around 100 gravitational radii emit infrared photons detectable by WISE, a feature absent from one-zone models.
  • X-ray emission is nonthermal for Pm=1 but inverse-Compton dominated for Pm=0.5.
  • X-ray detection is plausible in dense molecular-cloud filaments for Pm ≥ 1 but challenging for Pm < 1.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Targeted multi-wavelength searches in molecular clouds could use the infrared component to test the predicted dependence on magnetic Prandtl number.
  • If the radial predictions hold, similar modeling may help interpret low-luminosity accretion in other systems where flux transport affects visibility.
  • Time-dependent extensions of the model could reveal whether flux transport also controls variability patterns in the emitted light.

Load-bearing premise

The one-dimensional radial disk structure and the specific prescription for magnetic flux transport controlled by the magnetic Prandtl number accurately capture the multi-wavelength emission without major changes from three-dimensional effects or alternative transport rules.

What would settle it

A sensitive infrared survey of molecular clouds that finds no sources at the flux levels predicted from outer accretion disks around isolated black holes, or X-ray observations that fail to show the expected shift from nonthermal to inverse-Compton spectra as environment density changes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31477 by Shigeo S. Kimura, Takumi Koshimizu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic picture of accretion disk formation around an IBH moving through a molecular cloud. In IBH rest frame, molecular gas flows in from infinity along the z-axis with the velocity Veff, forming a bow shock owing to the supersonic motion of the IBH. The dashed lines represent stream lines of the flow. The orange and black lines indicate captured and unbound gas trajectories, respectively. If the molecu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The numerical solutions of Equations (13) and (14) after the system has reached a steady state with Veff = 20 km s−1 and nMC = 103 cm−3 . The solid black and dotted blue lines represent the limiting magnetic flux and the initial condition, respectively. The dot-dashed and dashed lines show the steady-state numerical solutions for Pm = 0.5 and Pm = 1, respectively. in the disk, the upper limit of the magnet… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: nMC–Veff parameter space satisfying ΦH ≥ ΦMAD for each magnetic Prandtl number. The solid blue, dashed orange, dotted green, and dot-dashed curves represent the contours ΦH = ΦMAD for Pm = 0.5(q = 0.55), Pm = 0.7(q = 0.75), Pm = 0.8(q = 0.84), Pm = 0.9(q = 0.92). The MAD condition for Pm < 1 is sat￾isfied toward higher nMC and Veff. The gray shaded region corresponds to m˙ ≡ Mc ˙ 2 /LEdd > 0.01, where the … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The radial profiles of the magnetic field strength used in the radiation calculation, Brad, for Models A–F (see Equation (25)). The solid and dashed curves correspond to Pm = 0.5 and Pm = 1, respectively. BH 𝑑𝑅 𝑅 𝐻 𝑅in 𝑅out ⋯ ⋯ Annulus Extinction Disk Molecular Cloud [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic illustration of the radiation calculation from the accretion disk. The disk is divided into annuli with width dR. The radiation from each annulus is calculated and integrated over the disk. The emitted photons suffer extinc￾tion in the surrounding molecular cloud. depends on the electron temperature. Therefore, the electron temperature in each annulus must be deter￾mined self-consistently. The he… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The radial profiles of the electron temperature Te for Models A–F. The solid and dashed lines correspond to Pm = 0.5 and Pm = 1, respectively. IBH, the electron temperature is instead limited by ad￾vection. We consider two characteristic temperatures, Te,rad and Te,ad ≈ feTp (see Equation 6), and adopt Te = min (Te,ad, Te,rad) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Multiwavelength spectra for Models A (top) and B (bottom). The thick dashed and solid curves indicate the intrinsic and extincted total spectra, respectively. The thin solid, dotted, dashed, and dash-dotted curves represent the intrinsic thermal synchrotron, bremsstrahlung, IC and nonthermal synchrotron components, respectively. The gray lines are sensitivity limits for WISE (cryogenic all-sky survey; 5σ p… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of the multiwavelength spectra for Models B (blue) and the one-zone model of S. S. Kimura et al. 2021a (red). Solid and dashed curves indicate spectra with and without extinction, respectively. rable to the sensitivity of future MeV satellites (R. Ca￾puto et al. 2022; T. Aramaki et al. 2020). In contrast, the predicted X-ray flux remains below the eROSITA sensitivity for model E. The higher lum… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Isolated stellar-mass black holes (IBHs) are expected to be abundant in the Milky Way, yet their electromagnetic signatures remain largely undetected. We investigate the detectability of IBHs in molecular clouds using a 1D, multi-wavelength emission model that incorporates magnetic flux transport controlled by the magnetic Prandtl number $P_m$. We find that magnetically arrested disks (MADs) form for $P_m\gtrsim 1$, where the magnetic flux threading the black hole is in a saturation value. On the other hand, MAD formation is restricted to a limited parameter range for $P_m<1$, In our model, outer parts of accretion disks, around 100 gravitational radii, efficiently emit infrared photons detectable by WISE. This feature is not captured by the conventional one-zone model. X-ray emission depends strongly on $P_m$; For $P_m=1$ where MAD is formed, X-ray emission is dominated by nonthermal radiation, whereas inverse Compton emission becomes dominant for $P_m=0.5$ where the magnetic field is weaker than the saturation value. X-ray detection is plausible if they are in dense molecular-cloud filaments for $P_m\ge1$, although it is challenging for $P_m< 1$. These results demonstrate that magnetic flux transport plays a key role in shaping the multiwavelength observational signatures of IBHs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a 1D radial multi-wavelength emission model for accretion onto isolated stellar-mass black holes that incorporates magnetic flux transport controlled by the magnetic Prandtl number Pm. It reports that magnetically arrested disks form for Pm ≳ 1, that outer disk regions near 100 gravitational radii produce infrared emission detectable by WISE (unlike conventional one-zone models), that X-ray emission is nonthermal for Pm=1 but inverse-Compton dominated for Pm=0.5, and that X-ray detection is plausible in dense molecular-cloud filaments for Pm ≥ 1.

Significance. If the 1D model and Pm prescription hold, the work supplies concrete, Pm-dependent predictions for the infrared and X-ray signatures of isolated black holes that differ from one-zone expectations and could guide targeted searches in molecular clouds. The parametric exploration of magnetic flux transport is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [abstract / model section] The central claims on infrared emission at ~100 r_g and the Pm-dependent X-ray mechanisms rest on the 1D radial structure plus the specific Pm-controlled flux-transport prescription; no explicit tests are shown demonstrating that these predictions remain unchanged under 3D turbulence, non-axisymmetric effects, or alternative advection/diffusion schemes (abstract and model description).
  2. [methods / results] The manuscript states clear parametric results but provides neither the full derivation steps for the temperature profile and emission components, numerical resolution tests, nor direct comparison to prior codes, making it impossible to verify that the reported fluxes follow from the stated equations rather than unstated choices (abstract).
minor comments (1)
  1. [abstract] Minor grammatical issue in abstract: "for Pm<1, In our model" should be rephrased for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and for recognizing the value of the parametric Pm exploration. We address each major comment below. The work is a 1D model by design to enable broad parameter studies; this imposes inherent limitations relative to 3D simulations that we will clarify in revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [abstract / model section] The central claims on infrared emission at ~100 r_g and the Pm-dependent X-ray mechanisms rest on the 1D radial structure plus the specific Pm-controlled flux-transport prescription; no explicit tests are shown demonstrating that these predictions remain unchanged under 3D turbulence, non-axisymmetric effects, or alternative advection/diffusion schemes (abstract and model description).

    Authors: We acknowledge that the reported IR and X-ray predictions are obtained within the 1D radial framework and the chosen Pm-dependent flux-transport scheme. Explicit verification against 3D turbulence, non-axisymmetric flows, or alternative advection/diffusion prescriptions would require dedicated 3D MHD simulations, which lie outside the scope of the present study. We will add a new subsection in the model description that explicitly states the 1D assumptions, discusses possible impacts of 3D effects, and notes that the qualitative Pm trends are expected to be robust within the adopted framework. No quantitative 3D tests can be provided without new simulations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [methods / results] The manuscript states clear parametric results but provides neither the full derivation steps for the temperature profile and emission components, numerical resolution tests, nor direct comparison to prior codes, making it impossible to verify that the reported fluxes follow from the stated equations rather than unstated choices (abstract).

    Authors: We will revise the methods section to include the complete step-by-step derivation of the temperature profile and the expressions for each emission component (synchrotron, inverse-Compton, bremsstrahlung). A short paragraph describing the numerical resolution tests performed and the adopted radial grid will be added. Direct comparisons of the one-zone limit and selected multi-zone fluxes against previously published one-zone calculations will also be included to confirm consistency with the underlying equations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model outputs are direct consequences of varying the input parameter Pm in a 1D radial structure

full rationale

The paper constructs a 1D multi-wavelength emission model in which magnetic flux transport is parameterized by the magnetic Prandtl number Pm. All reported results—formation of MADs for Pm ≳ 1, infrared emission from ~100 r_g, and Pm-dependent X-ray mechanisms—are obtained by running the model across different fixed values of Pm. No equation or result is obtained by fitting model outputs back to the same data used to set Pm, no quantity is defined in terms of itself, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation whose content is unverified. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on a 1D radial accretion prescription, a magnetic-flux transport law parameterized by Pm, and standard assumptions about radiative processes (synchrotron, inverse-Compton). No new particles or forces are introduced. Pm itself is treated as a free parameter scanned over a range rather than derived.

free parameters (1)
  • magnetic Prandtl number Pm
    Scanned as the central control parameter; values 0.5 and 1 are highlighted for contrasting X-ray regimes.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption 1D radial structure suffices to capture multi-wavelength emission
    Invoked by the choice of model dimensionality in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Standard thin-disk radiative processes apply at the quoted radii
    Implicit in the statements about infrared and X-ray mechanisms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5781 in / 1455 out tokens · 35203 ms · 2026-07-01T04:33:51.743224+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    D., Acernese, F., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., et al. 2023, Physical Review X, 13, 041039, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 2023

  2. [2]

    2002, MNRAS, 329, 355, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.04988.x

    Agol, E., & Kamionkowski, M. 2002, MNRAS, 334, 553, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05523.x André, P., Di Francesco, J., Ward-Thompson, D., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05523.x 2002

  3. [3]

    Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 27–51, doi: 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002

    work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002

  4. [4]

    Aramaki, T., Adrian, P. O. H., Karagiorgi, G., & Odaka, H. 2020, Astroparticle Physics, 114, 107, doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2019.07.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2019.07.002 2020

  5. [5]

    J., & Natarajan, P

    Armitage, P. J., & Natarajan, P. 1999, ApJL, 523, L7, doi: 10.1086/312261

    work page doi:10.1086/312261 1999

  6. [6]

    W., Rickett, B

    Armstrong, J. W., Rickett, B. J., & Spangler, S. R. 1995, ApJ, 443, 209, doi: 10.1086/175515

    work page doi:10.1086/175515 1995

  7. [7]

    2016, ApJ, 826, 77, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/77

    Ball, D., Özel, F., Psaltis, D., & Chan, C.-k. 2016, ApJ, 826, 77, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/77

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/1/77 2016

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Barkov, M. V., Khangulyan, D. V., & Popov, S. B. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 589, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22029.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22029.x 2012

  9. [9]

    , year = 1999, month = oct, volume =

    Blandford, R. D., & Begelman, M. C. 1999, MNRAS, 303, L1, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02358.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02358.x 1999

  10. [10]

    2022, A&A, 660, A5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142821 15

    Bosch-Ramon, V. 2022, A&A, 660, A5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142821 15

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142821 2022

  11. [11]

    E., & Bethe, H

    Brown, G. E., & Bethe, H. A. 1994, ApJ, 423, 659, doi: 10.1086/173844

    work page doi:10.1086/173844 1994

  12. [12]

    2011, ApJ, 737, 94, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/94

    Cao, X. 2011, ApJ, 737, 94, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/94

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/94 2011

  13. [13]

    A., et al

    Caputo, R., Ajello, M., Kierans, C. A., et al. 2022, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 8, 044003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.8.4.044003

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.8.4.044003 2022

  14. [14]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  15. [15]

    2018, MNRAS, 478, 5209, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1261

    Chael, A., Rowan, M., Narayan, R., Johnson, M., & Sironi, L. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 5209, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1261

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1261 2018

  16. [16]

    R., Dodelson, S., & Kolb, E

    Chisholm, J. R., Dodelson, S., & Kolb, E. W. 2003, ApJ, 596, 437, doi: 10.1086/377628

    work page doi:10.1086/377628 2003

  17. [17]

    M., Casares, J., Muñoz-Darias, T., et al

    Corral-Santana, J. M., Casares, J., Muñoz-Darias, T., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, A61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527130

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527130 2016

  18. [18]

    Troland, T. H. 2010, ApJ, 725, 466, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/466

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/725/1/466 2010

  19. [19]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  20. [20]

    2004, NewAR, 48, 843, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2004.06.001

    Edgar, R. 2004, NewAR, 48, 843, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2004.06.001

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1016/j.newar.2004.06.001 2004

  21. [21]

    2023a, MNRAS, 518, 1057, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3140

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., Quataert, E., et al. 2023a, MNRAS, 518, 1057, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3140

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3140

  22. [22]

    2023b, MNRAS, 521, 4323, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad799

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., Cendes, Y., et al. 2023b, MNRAS, 521, 4323, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad799

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad799

  23. [23]

    Nahar, S. N. 1992, ApJ, 387, 95, doi: 10.1086/171063

    work page doi:10.1086/171063 1992

  24. [24]

    Fromang, S., & Stone, J. M. 2009, A&A, 507, 19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912752

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912752 2009

  25. [25]

    Nakamura, K. E. 1998, ApJL, 495, L85, doi: 10.1086/311220 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657 Gaia Collaboration, Panuzzo, P., Mazeh, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449763

    work page doi:10.1086/311220 1998

  26. [26]

    Guan, X., & Gammie, C. F. 2011, ApJ, 728, 130, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/130

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/728/2/130 2011

  27. [27]

    2020, Physics of Plasmas, 27, 080501, doi: 10.1063/5.0012094 Güver, T., & Özel, F

    Guo, F., Liu, Y.-H., Li, X., et al. 2020, Physics of Plasmas, 27, 080501, doi: 10.1063/5.0012094 Güver, T., & Özel, F. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 2050, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15598.x

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0012094 2020

  28. [28]

    F., & Krolik, J

    Hawley, J. F., & Krolik, J. H. 2013, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 474, Numerical Modeling of Space Plasma Flows (ASTRONUM2012), ed. N. V. Pogorelov, E. Audit, & G. P. Zank, 59

    2013

  29. [29]

    Heyer, M., Krawczyk, C., Duval, J., & Jackson, J. M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1092, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1092

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/1092 2009

  30. [30]

    2023, ApJ, 946, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbfb5

    Hoshino, M. 2023, ApJ, 946, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbfb5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbfb5 2023

  31. [31]

    2017, MNRAS, 470, 3332, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1337

    Murase, K. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 3332, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1337

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1337 2017

  32. [32]

    C., Lowell, B., et al

    Jacquemin-Ide, J., Begelman, M. C., Lowell, B., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.25842, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.25842

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.25842 2025

  33. [33]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 2924, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2935

    Jia, H., Ripperda, B., Quataert, E., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 2924, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2935

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2935 2023

  34. [34]

    A., Brendel, L., & Kuiper, R

    Jolehkaran, S. A., Brendel, L., & Kuiper, R. 2025, A&A, 694, A239, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451658 Käpylä, P. J., Rheinhardt, M., Brandenburg, A., & Käpylä, M. J. 2020, A&A, 636, A93, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935012

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451658 2025

  35. [35]

    Kim, Y., & Most, E. R. 2025, PhRvD, 111, 083025, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083025

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.083025 2025

  36. [36]

    S., Kashiyama, K., & Hotokezaka, K

    Kimura, S. S., Kashiyama, K., & Hotokezaka, K. 2021a, ApJL, 922, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac35dc

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac35dc 2041

  37. [37]

    S., Sudoh, T., Kashiyama, K., & Kawanaka, N

    Kimura, S. S., Sudoh, T., Kashiyama, K., & Kawanaka, N. 2021b, ApJ, 915, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abff58

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abff58

  38. [38]

    S., & Toma, K

    Kimura, S. S., & Toma, K. 2020, ApJ, 905, 178, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc343

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc343 2020

  39. [39]

    2025, ApJL, 981, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adb841

    Zhang, B. 2025, ApJL, 981, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adb841

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adb841 2025

  40. [40]

    S., Tomida, K., & Murase, K

    Kimura, S. S., Tomida, K., & Murase, K. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 163, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz329

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz329 2019

  41. [41]

    Kin, K., Kuze, R., & Kimura, S. S. 2025, ApJ, 985, 251, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adcb3d Könyves, V., André, P., Men’shchikov, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525861

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcb3d 2025

  42. [42]

    2024, ApJ, 973, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5feb

    Koshimoto, N., Kawanaka, N., & Tsuna, D. 2024, ApJ, 973, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5feb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5feb 2024

  43. [43]

    R., et al

    Lalakos, A., Tchekhovskoy, A., Most, E. R., et al. 2025, PhRvD, 112, 123044, doi: 10.1103/zkq5-bj75

    work page doi:10.1103/zkq5-bj75 2025

  44. [44]

    Y., & Lu, J

    Lam, C. Y., & Lu, J. R. 2023, ApJ, 955, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aced4a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced4a 2023

  45. [45]

    T., Cunningham, A

    Lee, A. T., Cunningham, A. J., McKee, C. F., & Klein, R. I. 2014, ApJ, 783, 50, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/50

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/1/50 2014

  46. [46]

    H., Papaloizou, J

    Lubow, S. H., Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Pringle, J. E. 1994, MNRAS, 267, 235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/267.2.235

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/267.2.235 1994

  47. [47]

    2024, ApJ, 965, 175

    Manikantan, V., Kaaz, N., Jacquemin-Ide, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 965, 175

    2024

  48. [48]

    1997, ApJ, 489, 791, doi: 10.1086/304817

    Manmoto, T., Mineshige, S., & Kusunose, M. 1997, ApJ, 489, 791, doi: 10.1086/304817

    work page doi:10.1086/304817 1997

  49. [49]

    G., Nixon, C

    Martin, R. G., Nixon, C. J., Pringle, J. E., & Livio, M. 2019, New Astronomy, 70, 7, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2019.01.001 16

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2019.01.001 2019

  50. [50]

    2025, A&A, 700, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554910

    Palacio, S. 2025, A&A, 700, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554910

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554910 2025

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    McKinney, J. C., Tchekhovskoy, A., & Blandford, R. D. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 3083, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21074.x Miville-Deschênes, M.-A., Murray, N., & Lee, E. J. 2017, ApJ, 834, 57, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/57

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21074.x 2012

  52. [52]

    Murchikova, L., & Sahu, K. C. 2025, ApJL, 988, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade7f8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade7f8 2025

  53. [53]

    2025, PASP, 137, 034203, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/adb6d6

    Nagarajan, P., & El-Badry, K. 2025, PASP, 137, 034203, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/adb6d6

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/adb6d6 2025

  54. [54]

    V., & Abramowicz, M

    Narayan, R., Igumenshchev, I. V., & Abramowicz, M. A. 2003, PASJ, 55, L69, doi: 10.1093/pasj/55.6.L69

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/55.6.l69 2003

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    Narayan, R., Sądowski, A., Penna, R. F., & Kulkarni, A. K. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 3241, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22002.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22002.x 2012

  56. [56]

    1994, ApJL, 428, L13, doi: 10.1086/187381

    Narayan, R., & Yi, I. 1994, ApJL, 428, L13, doi: 10.1086/187381

    work page doi:10.1086/187381 1994

  57. [57]

    1995, ApJ, 452, 710, doi: 10.1086/176343

    Narayan, R., & Yi, I. 1995, ApJ, 452, 710, doi: 10.1086/176343

    work page doi:10.1086/176343 1995

  58. [58]

    2024, MNRAS, 528, 2588, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae195

    Ogata, E., Ohsuga, K., Fukushima, H., & Yajima, H. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 2588, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae195

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae195 2024

  59. [59]

    2014, ApJ, 785, 127, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/127

    Okuzumi, S., Takeuchi, T., & Muto, T. 2014, ApJ, 785, 127, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/127

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/785/2/127 2014

  60. [60]

    2020, A&A, 638, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936557

    Olejak, A., Belczynski, K., Bulik, T., & Sobolewska, M. 2020, A&A, 638, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936557

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936557 2020

  61. [61]

    2011, ApJ, 739, 2, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/2

    Park, K., & Ricotti, M. 2011, ApJ, 739, 2, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/2

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/739/1/2 2011

  62. [62]

    2012, ApJ, 747, 9, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/9

    Park, K., & Ricotti, M. 2012, ApJ, 747, 9, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/9

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/747/1/9 2012

  63. [63]

    2013, ApJ, 767, 163, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/163

    Park, K., & Ricotti, M. 2013, ApJ, 767, 163, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/163

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/2/163 2013

  64. [64]

    W., Palumbo, D

    Pesce, D. W., Palumbo, D. C. M., Narayan, R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 260, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2eb5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2eb5 2021

  65. [65]

    2021, A&A, 647, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039313

    Predehl, P., Andritschke, R., Arefiev, V., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039313

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039313 2021

  66. [66]

    Ripperda, B., Bacchini, F., & Philippov, A. A. 2020, ApJ, 900, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ababab

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ababab 2020

  67. [67]

    2022, ApJL, 924, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac46a1

    Ripperda, B., Liska, M., Chatterjee, K., et al. 2022, ApJL, 924, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac46a1

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac46a1 2022

  68. [68]

    M., Heyer, M., Rathborne, J., & Simon, R

    Roman-Duval, J., Jackson, J. M., Heyer, M., Rathborne, J., & Simon, R. 2010, ApJ, 723, 492, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/492

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/723/1/492 2010

  69. [69]

    E., Sironi, L., & Narayan, R

    Rowan, M. E., Sironi, L., & Narayan, R. 2017, ApJ, 850, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9380

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9380 2017

  70. [70]

    2013, MNRAS, 436, 3856, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1881

    Sadowski, A., Narayan, R., Penna, R., & Zhu, Y. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 3856, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1881

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1881 2013

  71. [71]

    C., Anderson, J., Casertano, S., et al

    Sahu, K. C., Anderson, J., Casertano, S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 933, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac739e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac739e 2022

  72. [72]

    I., & Sunyaev, R

    Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337

    1973

  73. [73]

    The physics of compact objects

    Shapiro, S. L., & Teukolsky, S. A. 1983, Black holes, white dwarfs and neutron stars. The physics of compact objects, doi: 10.1002/9783527617661

    work page doi:10.1002/9783527617661 1983

  74. [74]

    2014, ApJL, 783, L21, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L21

    Sironi, L., & Spitkovsky, A. 2014, ApJL, 783, L21, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L21

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/l21 2014

  75. [75]

    A., & Giannios, D

    Sironi, L., Uzdensky, D. A., & Giannios, D. 2025, ARA&A, 63, 127, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-020325-115713 Sądowski, A., Narayan, R., Penna, R., & Zhu, Y. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 3856, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1881

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-020325-115713 2025

  76. [76]

    2020, MNRAS, 495, 2966, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1394

    Sugimura, K., & Ricotti, M. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 2966, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1394

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1394 2020

  77. [77]

    K., & Inutsuka, S.-i

    Suzuki, T. K., & Inutsuka, S.-i. 2014, ApJ, 784, 121, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/2/121

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/784/2/121 2014

  78. [78]

    S., et al

    Tanikawa, A., Wang, L., Fujii, M. S., et al. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 79, doi: 10.33232/001c.141294

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.141294 2025

  79. [79]

    Gladstone, J. C. 2016, VizieR Online Data Catalog: WATCHDOG: an all-sky database of Galactic BHXBs (Tetarenko+, 2016)„ VizieR On-line Data Catalog: J/ApJS/222/15. Originally published in: 2016ApJS..222...15T doi: 10.26093/cds/vizier.22220015

    work page doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.22220015 2016

  80. [80]

    2018, MNRAS, 477, 791, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty699

    Tsuna, D., Kawanaka, N., & Totani, T. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 791, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty699

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty699 2018

Showing first 80 references.