pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31897 · v1 · pith:BO2DMYH5new · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

High Frequency Wideband Study of FRB 20240114A with the Allen Telescope Array

Param Joshi , Vishal Gajjar , Joel Earwicker , Sofia Z. Sheikh , Mohammed A. Chamma , Joe Bright , Luigi F. Cruz , Roy H. Davis
show 9 more authors
David R. DeBoer R. A. Donnachie Wael Farah Phil Karn Joao Paolo C. M. Oliveira Karen I. Perez Alexander W. Pollak Andrew Siemion Michael Snodgrass
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 03:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords fast radio burstsrepeating FRBsFRB 20240114Achromatic emissionband-limited burstshigh-frequency observationsAllen Telescope Array
0
0 comments X

The pith

FRB 20240114A produces bursts only up to 5 GHz, with rates that change sharply by frequency and observing epoch.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

A long campaign with the Allen Telescope Array tracked the repeating fast radio burst FRB 20240114A across 900 MHz to 7.6 GHz for over 1100 hours. Bursts appeared between 900 MHz and 5 GHz, including a strong episode in the S band, but none were seen in the highest-frequency bands despite substantial exposure. The rate of bursts changed markedly with both the observing frequency and the calendar date, showing that the source emits in a way that is strongly limited to certain frequency ranges and varies over time. Measurements of the bursts also showed that their fractional bandwidth stays roughly constant across frequencies while sub-burst durations shorten and drift rates steepen at higher frequencies. The energy distribution of the detected bursts follows a shallow power law, so the brightest events account for a large share of the total energy released.

Core claim

The emission from FRB 20240114A is highly chromatic and band-limited, with the burst rate varying strongly with both observing frequency and epoch; no bursts were detected above approximately 5 GHz despite 1167 hours of simultaneous wideband coverage from 900 MHz to 7620 MHz.

What carries the argument

Simultaneous wideband observations across 1344 MHz of bandwidth that directly compare burst detections and non-detections at different frequencies to establish the chromatic and band-limited nature of the emission.

If this is right

  • The cumulative spectral-energy-density distribution follows a shallow power law above the completeness threshold, so high-energy bursts dominate the total energy output.
  • Sub-burst durations shorten and the magnitude of downward frequency drift increases toward higher frequencies.
  • Fractional bandwidth of sub-bursts remains approximately constant across the observed range.
  • The high-frequency burst storm does not match predictions from strictly phase-coherent long-timescale frequency-modulation models.
  • Incomplete frequency coverage can produce misleading pictures of burst activity in repeating FRBs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Sustained simultaneous wideband monitoring is required to avoid selection biases when interpreting the activity of hyperactive repeaters.
  • Models of FRB emission must incorporate a mechanism that naturally produces strong frequency dependence and time variability on both short and long timescales.
  • Future searches for repeating FRBs should prioritize continuous coverage across at least an octave in frequency to capture the full band-limited behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The lack of detections above 5 GHz is caused by an intrinsic cutoff in the source rather than the telescope sensitivity being too low in those bands.

What would settle it

A detection of even one burst above 5 GHz in a new observation with comparable or better sensitivity at those frequencies would show the cutoff is not intrinsic.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31897 by Alexander W. Pollak, Andrew Siemion, David R. DeBoer, Joao Paolo C. M. Oliveira, Joe Bright, Joel Earwicker, Karen I. Perez, Luigi F. Cruz, Michael Snodgrass, Mohammed A. Chamma, Param Joshi, Phil Karn, R. A. Donnachie, Roy H. Davis, Sofia Z. Sheikh, Vishal Gajjar, Wael Farah.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Total on-sky observing time for FRB 20240114A as a function of observed frequency. The ATA campaign used multiple LO tunings spanning approximately 900–7620 MHz, with the largest exposure obtained at the lower-frequency tunings. The observing time shown here includes all data acquired between 27 January and 29 October 2024. 60350 60400 60450 60500 60550 60600 MJD 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Frequenc… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Temporal and frequency coverage of the ATA observations of FRB 20240114A. Dark green vertical segments show the 1344 MHz frequency range (two consecutive LOs) covered by each observing scan as a function of MJD, while yellow stars mark the detected FRB bursts. The observations span approximately 900–7620 MHz and show the progression from lower-frequency tunings early in the campaign to higher-frequency tun… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dynamic Spectra of 20 of the detected FRBs. The vertical dotted lines represent the on-pulse regions of the bursts as well as the sub-bursts, which are used for the SNR calculations described in Section 3.2. The dynamic spectrum plots for all 97 bursts can be found on zenodo.org/uploads/19429415 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distributions of spectro-temporal burst properties as a function of center frequency for FRB 20240114A. The X-axis is binned by a factor of 4 to account for the 4 unique LO tunings in which we detected all the bursts. The Split violin plots compare measurements from the full burst envelopes with those from the individual sub-burst components. The left half of each violin shows the full-burst measurements, … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Multi-telescope burst center frequency versus MJD, with the P = 112.91 day periodic frequency-modulation model of R.-N. Li et al. (2026) overlaid (solid black curve; dotted lines mark cycle boundaries). ATA (gold stars), Murriyang (blue diamonds; P. A. Uttarkar et al. (2026)), and Effelsberg (red circles; P. Limaye et al. (2025)) bursts are shown as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Isotropic-equivalent burst energy as a function of center frequency for FRB 20240114A. Red and blue violin plots show the distributions for combined bursts and individual sub-bursts, respectively. Embedded box plots indicate the median and interquartile range, while black points and vertical bars mark the geometric mean and standard deviation. The distributions span several orders of magnitude, indicating … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Log-scale plot of the cumulative burst rate as a function of spectral energy density (SED) for the ATA bursts, compared with the FAST energetics from J.-S. Zhang et al. (2025). The ATA distribution is fit with a power law of index γ = −0.74±0.02 above the completeness limit. The dashed vertical line marks the ATA completeness limit (9.5×1029 erg Hz−1 ), which is also taken as the break point of the FAST po… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Normalised Drift Rate vs Duration using multi-component drift rates. The solid line is a fit of the form νdt/dν = Aσt + b, fitted using the orthogonal distance regression method, via the scipy.odr package. The values obtained for A and b are consistent with the values found for other FRB repeaters as well as for the analogous relationship found between the sub-burst slope (or intra-burst drift) and duratio… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a high-frequency, wideband observing campaign of the hyperactive repeating fast radio burst FRB 20240114A with the Allen Telescope Array. Between 27 January and 29 October 2024, we obtained 1167 hr of on-source observations across 1344 MHz of simultaneous bandwidth covering frequencies from approximately 900 MHz to 7620 MHz. We detected 97 bursts between ~900 MHz and ~5 GHz, including a strong S-band activity episode, while no bursts were detected in the highest-frequency tunings above ~5 GHz despite substantial exposure. This campaign provides one of the very few extended samples of repeating-FRB activity above 3 GHz, a regime that remains sparsely sampled. We find that the burst rate varies strongly with both observing frequency and epoch, confirming that the emission from FRB 20240114A is highly chromatic and band-limited. We measure the spectro-temporal properties of the bursts and their sub-components, confirming that fractional bandwidth remains approximately scale-invariant. Sub-burst durations decrease toward higher frequencies, and the magnitude of the downward drift rate increases with frequency. The cumulative spectral-energy-density distribution above our completeness threshold is well described by a shallow power law, indicating that high-energy bursts contribute substantially to the observed energy output. We also compare our detections with recently proposed long-timescale frequency-modulation models and find that the ATA high-frequency burst storm is not consistent with a strictly phase-coherent modulation inferred from other datasets. Our results demonstrate that incomplete time-frequency coverage can bias interpretations of burst activity and highlight the need for sustained, simultaneous wideband monitoring of hyperactive repeaters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports 1167 hours of ATA wideband observations (0.9–7.62 GHz) of the hyperactive repeater FRB 20240114A, yielding 97 bursts detected between ~900 MHz and ~5 GHz and zero detections above ~5 GHz. The authors conclude that burst rate varies strongly with frequency and epoch, confirming highly chromatic and band-limited emission; they further report scale-invariant fractional bandwidth, decreasing sub-burst durations and increasing downward drift rates with frequency, a shallow power-law cumulative energy distribution, and inconsistency with strictly phase-coherent long-timescale frequency-modulation models.

Significance. If the non-detections are shown to be intrinsic, the work supplies one of the few extended high-frequency samples of a hyperactive repeater and demonstrates that incomplete frequency coverage can bias activity interpretations, with direct implications for emission physics and the design of future monitoring campaigns.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the section discussing high-frequency non-detections: the central claim that emission is 'highly chromatic and band-limited' rests on the interpretation of zero detections above ~5 GHz despite 1167 hr total exposure. No band-by-band SEFD, T_sys, or completeness fluence thresholds are supplied, so it is not possible to exclude the possibility that the highest tunings simply have higher fluence thresholds (a factor of 3–5 degradation is common at C-band).
  2. [Results (burst detection and non-detections)] The section on burst detection statistics and completeness: without explicit per-tuning completeness curves or fluence limits, the reported strong frequency dependence of the burst rate cannot be verified as intrinsic rather than sensitivity-driven, directly affecting the soundness of the chromaticity conclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that this is 'one of the very few extended samples above 3 GHz' would be strengthened by citing the specific prior high-frequency campaigns referenced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The two major comments correctly identify that our current presentation lacks sufficient quantitative detail on per-tuning sensitivity to fully substantiate the intrinsic nature of the high-frequency non-detections and the reported frequency dependence of the burst rate. We address both points below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the section discussing high-frequency non-detections: the central claim that emission is 'highly chromatic and band-limited' rests on the interpretation of zero detections above ~5 GHz despite 1167 hr total exposure. No band-by-band SEFD, T_sys, or completeness fluence thresholds are supplied, so it is not possible to exclude the possibility that the highest tunings simply have higher fluence thresholds (a factor of 3–5 degradation is common at C-band).

    Authors: We agree that explicit per-tuning sensitivity metrics are required to support the non-detection claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a new table (or expanded subsection in Section 3) listing SEFD, T_sys, and estimated completeness fluence thresholds for each of the 1344 MHz tunings, derived from our calibration observations. This will allow direct comparison of sensitivity across bands and will confirm that the absence of bursts above ~5 GHz is not driven by a factor of 3–5 degradation. We will also reference these limits in the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (burst detection and non-detections)] The section on burst detection statistics and completeness: without explicit per-tuning completeness curves or fluence limits, the reported strong frequency dependence of the burst rate cannot be verified as intrinsic rather than sensitivity-driven, directly affecting the soundness of the chromaticity conclusion.

    Authors: We concur that completeness curves and fluence limits per tuning are necessary to demonstrate that the observed rate variation is intrinsic. The revised manuscript will include per-tuning completeness curves (generated via injection-recovery tests) and explicit fluence thresholds in the burst detection statistics section. These additions will quantify the frequency dependence of the detection efficiency and thereby strengthen the evidence for chromatic, band-limited emission. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational reporting of detections and rates

full rationale

The paper reports telescope observations, burst detections between 900 MHz and 5 GHz, zero detections above 5 GHz, and measured spectro-temporal properties. No derivations, model fits, or predictions are presented that reduce to fitted parameters or self-citations by construction. The central claim (frequency- and epoch-dependent burst rate) follows directly from counting detections in the observed bands. Non-detection interpretation is an assumption about sensitivity but does not involve any definitional loop or renamed fit. This is self-contained observational work with no load-bearing self-citation chains or ansatzes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Observational astronomy paper; no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented physical entities are introduced or required by the central claims in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5908 in / 1014 out tokens · 42712 ms · 2026-07-01T03:47:25.177411+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2021, ApJL, 920, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2a3a

    Aggarwal, K. 2021, ApJL, 920, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2a3a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac2a3a 2021

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Barsdell, B. R., Bailes, M., Barnes, D. G., & Fluke, C. J. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 379, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20622.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20622.x 2012

  3. [3]

    2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16613, 1

    Bhardwaj, M., Kirichenko, A., & Gil de Paz, A. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16613, 1

    2024

  4. [4]

    A., Rajabi, F., et al

    Brown, K., Chamma, M. A., Rajabi, F., et al. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 529, L152, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slae012 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slae012 2024

  5. [5]

    A., Pop, V., & Rajabi, F

    Chamma, M. A., Pop, V., & Rajabi, F. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1799

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1799 2025

  6. [6]

    A., Rajabi, F., Kumar, A., & Houde, M

    Chamma, M. A., Rajabi, F., Kumar, A., & Houde, M. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 522, 3036, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1108

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1108 2023

  7. [7]

    A., Rajabi, F., Wyenberg, C

    Chamma, M. A., Rajabi, F., Wyenberg, C. M., Mathews, A., & Houde, M. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 507, 246, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2070

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2070 2021

  8. [8]

    M., Wasserman, I., Hessels, J

    Cordes, J. M., Wasserman, I., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2017, ApJ, 842, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa74da

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa74da 2017

  9. [9]

    G., Scholz, P., et al

    Cruces, M., Spitler, L. G., Scholz, P., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 448, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3223

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3223 2021

  10. [10]

    Gajjar, V., Siemion, A. P. V., Price, D. C., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 863, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad005

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad005 2018

  11. [11]

    2022, ApJ, 932, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6dd5

    Gajjar, V., LeDuc, D., Chen, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 932, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6dd5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6dd5 2022

  12. [12]

    M., Snelders, M

    Hewitt, D. M., Snelders, M. P., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 3577, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1960

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1960 2022

  13. [13]

    2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 085009, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ade34e

    Huang, Y.-X., Zhang, J.-S., Xu, H., et al. 2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 085009, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ade34e

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ade34e 2025

  14. [14]

    N., Spitler, L

    Jahns, J. N., Spitler, L. G., Nimmo, K., et al. 2023, \mnras, 519, 666, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3446

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3446 2023

  15. [15]

    T., et al

    Joshi, P., Medina, A., Earwicker, J. T., et al. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16599, 1

    2024

  16. [16]

    C., Hewitt, D

    Konijn, D. C., Hewitt, D. M., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 3331, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2296

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2296 2024

  17. [17]

    2024, ApJ, 977, 177, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84de

    Kumar, A., Maan, Y., & Bhusare, Y. 2024, ApJ, 977, 177, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84de

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad84de 2024

  18. [18]

    Periodic Emission Frequency Modulation in a Hyperactive Fast Radio Burst

    Li, R.-N., Lan, H.-T., Zhao, Z.-Y., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.12098, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.12098

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.12098 2026

  19. [19]

    2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16620, 1

    Limaye, P., & Spitler, L. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16620, 1

    2024

  20. [20]

    A broadband study of FRB20240114A with the Effelsberg 100-m radio telescope

    Limaye, P., Spitler, L. G., Manaswini, N., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.08367, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.08367

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.08367 2025

  21. [21]

    R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M

    Lorimer, D. R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M. A., Narkevic, D. J., & Crawford, F. 2007, Science, 318, 777, doi: 10.1126/science.1147532

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1147532 2007

  22. [22]

    2020, ApJ, 889, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab55de FRB 20240114A wideband study - Allen Telescope Array 19

    Lyutikov, M. 2020, ApJ, 889, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab55de FRB 20240114A wideband study - Allen Telescope Array 19

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab55de 2020

  23. [23]

    D., Margalit, B., & Sironi, L

    Metzger, B. D., Margalit, B., & Sironi, L. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 4091, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz700

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz700 2019

  24. [24]

    Nimmo, K., Hessels, J. W. T., Snelders, M. P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 2281, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad269

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad269 2023

  25. [25]

    S., Hessels, J

    Ould-Boukattine, O. S., Hessels, J. W. T., Kirsten, F., et al. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16432, 1

    2024

  26. [26]

    A 4200-hour HyperFlash and \'ECLAT campaign on the hyperactive FRB 20240114A: constraining energetics with the most brilliant bursts

    Ould-Boukattine, O. S., Cooper, A. J., Cook, A. M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.18513, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.18513

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.18513 2026

  27. [27]

    2025, ApJ, 989, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adeb74

    Kudale, S. 2025, ApJ, 989, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adeb74

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adeb74 2025

  28. [28]

    A., & Butler, B

    Perley, R. A., & Butler, B. J. 2017, ApJS, 230, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6df9 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa6df9 2017

  29. [29]

    G., et al

    Pleunis, Z., Michilli, D., Bassa, C. G., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 911, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abec72

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abec72 2021

  30. [30]

    A., Wyenberg, C

    Rajabi, F., Chamma, M. A., Wyenberg, C. M., Mathews, A., & Houde, M. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 498, 4936, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2723

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2723 2020

  31. [31]

    2019, DM phase: Algorithm for correcting dispersion of radio signals,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1910.004 http://ascl.net/1910.004

    Seymour, A., Michilli, D., & Pleunis, Z. 2019, DM phase: Algorithm for correcting dispersion of radio signals,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1910.004 http://ascl.net/1910.004

    2019

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Sheikh, S. Z., Farah, W., Pollak, A. W., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 10425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3630

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3630 2024

  33. [33]

    2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16420, 1

    Shin, K., & CHIME/FRB Collaboration. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16420, 1

    2024

  34. [34]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.13297, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.13297

    Shin, K., Curtin, A., Fine, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.13297, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.13297

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.13297 2025

  35. [35]

    P., Bhandari, S., Kirsten, F., et al

    Snelders, M. P., Bhandari, S., Kirsten, F., et al. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16542, 1

    2024

  36. [36]

    A., Kumar, P., Lower, M

    Uttarkar, P. A., Kumar, P., Lower, M. E., & Shannon, R. M. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16430, 1

    2024

  37. [37]

    A., Shannon, R

    Uttarkar, P. A., Shannon, R. M., Gourdji, K., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.16409, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.16409 van Straten, W., & Bailes, M. 2010, DSPSR: Digital Signal Processing Software for Pulsar Astronomy,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1010.006 http://ascl.net/1010.006

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.16409 2026

  38. [38]

    Y., & Zhang, G

    Wang, F. Y., & Zhang, G. Q. 2019, ApJ, 882, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab35dc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab35dc 2019

  39. [39]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.15615, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.15615

    Wang, X.-W., Yan, Z., Shen, Z.-Q., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.15615, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.15615

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.15615 2025

  40. [40]

    , year = 2022, month = sep, volume =

    Xu, H., Niu, J. R., Chen, P., et al. 2022, Nature, 609, 685, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05071-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05071-8 2022

  41. [41]

    2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16433, 1

    Zhang, J., Zhu, Y., Cao, S., et al. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16433, 1

    2024

  42. [42]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.14707, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.14707

    Zhang, J.-S., Wang, T.-C., Wang, P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.14707, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.14707

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.14707 2025

  43. [43]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.14711, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.14711

    Zhang, L.-X., Tian, S., Shen, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.14711, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.14711

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.14711 2025

  44. [44]

    2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 124002, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ac98f7

    Zhang, Y.-K., Wang, P., Feng, Y., et al. 2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 124002, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ac98f7

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ac98f7 2022

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Zhang, Y.-K., Li, D., Zhang, B., et al. 2023, ApJ, 955, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aced0b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced0b 2023

  46. [46]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.14708, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.14708

    Zhou, D., Wang, P., Fang, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.14708, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.14708

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.14708 2025