pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00702 · v1 · pith:47CPH34Snew · submitted 2026-07-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Weak-coupling tensor cross interpolation impurity solver for nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory

Shuta Matsuura , Hiroshi Shinaoka , Philipp Werner , Naoto Tsuji This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 05:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords nonequilibrium DMFTtensor cross interpolationweak-coupling expansionimpurity solverHubbard modelsign probleminteraction quench
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tensor cross interpolation approximates weak-coupling integrals to solve nonequilibrium DMFT impurity problems without stochastic sampling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an impurity solver for nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory that combines the weak-coupling expansion with tensor cross interpolation. It represents the high-dimensional integrands arising in the expansion as low-rank tensor trains for direct evaluation instead of Monte Carlo sampling. This approach mitigates the sign problem that limits continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo methods, particularly away from half filling. Benchmarks against an exactly solvable nonequilibrium impurity model confirm agreement and establish the low-rank character of the integrands. Applications to interaction-quench dynamics in the Hubbard model reproduce known thermalization behavior at half filling and reveal a crossover at three-quarters filling.

Core claim

The integrands of the weak-coupling expansion for nonequilibrium impurity models possess a low-rank structure that tensor cross interpolation can exploit to compute the integrals efficiently and without sampling, yielding results comparable to CT-QMC where the latter is reliable and remaining controlled where the sign problem is severe.

What carries the argument

Tensor cross interpolation applied to the integrands of the weak-coupling expansion, represented in tensor-train form for deterministic evaluation.

If this is right

  • The solver reproduces fast thermalization at a critical interaction strength in the half-filled Hubbard model with accuracy comparable to CT-QMC.
  • Away from half filling the method remains controlled and shows a crossover rather than a sharply defined fast thermalization point in the 3/4-filled case.
  • The same approach produces accurate spectral functions for steady-state DMFT problems in the metallic regime without requiring analytic continuation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the observed low-rank structure persists for multi-orbital or cluster impurity models, the solver could extend DMFT studies to systems currently limited by the sign problem.
  • The deterministic nature of the method opens a route to direct computation of real-frequency quantities in driven systems where long-time evolution is required.
  • Comparison of TCI results with other deterministic nonequilibrium solvers could map the precise range of interaction strengths and fillings where the low-rank approximation holds.

Load-bearing premise

The integrands of the weak-coupling expansion possess a sufficiently low-rank structure that tensor cross interpolation can capture them accurately enough for physical observables to remain reliable.

What would settle it

A calculation showing large deviations from exact results on the solvable impurity model, or from CT-QMC where the latter has no sign problem, in any of the reported parameter regimes would falsify the claim of reliable accuracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00702 by Hiroshi Shinaoka, Naoto Tsuji, Philipp Werner, Shuta Matsuura.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. L-shaped contour [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Next, we discretize the variables t, u1, u2, · · · , un+1 over the range 0 ≤ t ≤ tmax, 0 ≤ ui ≤ tmax (1 ≤ i ≤ n+1) with a suitable mesh, and perform a tensor-train decom￾position by the TCI algorithm for Q< nkσ(t, {ui}) to obtain its tensor-train representation as Q < nkσ(t, {ui}) ≃ M0(t)M1(u1)· · · Mn+1(un+1) = M0(t)M1(t − t1)· · · Mn+1(tn−1 − tn). (38) Here, the Mi(ui) are matrix-valued functions, whose … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Results obtained with the weak-coupling nonequilib [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Convergence of the error of the lesser Green’s function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Convergence of the error of (a,b) the lesser Green’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Results of the weak-coupling nonequilibrium TCI im [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Average-sign quantity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Time evolution of the double occupancy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Time evolution of the potential, kinetic, and total [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Time evolution of the double occupancy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Time evolution of the potential, kinetic, and total [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Time evolution of the distribution function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Time evolution of the normalized deviation of the nonequilibrium distribution function from the corresponding thermal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Doping dependence of the deviation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: shows the spectral function Aσ(ω) and the occupation function fst(ω)Aσ(ω) obtained by the FIG. 16. Spectral function Aσ(ω) and the occupation function fst(ω)Aσ(ω) of the Hubbard model obtained by the steady￾state DMFT calculation. The distribution function fst(ω) is set to the Fermi–Dirac distribution function with T = 0. The other parameters are U = 2v, and tmax = 8/v. The maximum bond dimension is set t… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Equilibrium DMFT phase diagram for the Hub [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Green’s function of the Hubbard model in thermal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Schematic illustration of the extrapolation of a two-variable function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Simulating nonequilibrium quantum many-body systems remains a major challenge due to the exponential growth of the computational complexity with real time. Here we implement a nonequilibrium impurity solver based on the weak-coupling expansion and the tensor cross interpolation (TCI), and apply it to nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT). The method approximates the integrands of the high-dimensional integrals arising in the weak-coupling expansion in a tensor-train form, enabling efficient evaluations without stochastic sampling and thereby mitigating the sign problem affecting continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo (CT-QMC) methods. Benchmark calculations for an exactly solvable nonequilibrium impurity model agree well with the exact results and reveal a low-rank structure of the integrands. When applied to interaction-quench problems in the half-filled Hubbard model, the method reproduces fast thermalization at a critical interaction strength with accuracy comparable to CT-QMC. Away from half filling, where the sign problem becomes even more severe, the present approach remains well controlled, revealing a crossover instead of a sharply defined fast thermalization point in the 3/4-filled case. The solver can also be applied to steady-state DMFT problems, yielding accurate spectral functions in the metallic regime without analytic continuation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a nonequilibrium impurity solver for DMFT that uses the weak-coupling expansion with integrands approximated via tensor cross interpolation (TCI) in tensor-train format. This deterministic method avoids stochastic sampling and the sign problem of CT-QMC. Benchmarks on an exactly solvable nonequilibrium impurity model show good agreement with exact results and reveal low tensor rank. Applications to interaction quenches in the half-filled Hubbard model match CT-QMC accuracy for fast thermalization, while away from half-filling the approach remains controlled and indicates a crossover rather than a sharp transition at 3/4 filling. The solver also yields accurate metallic spectral functions in steady-state DMFT without analytic continuation.

Significance. If the reported low-rank structure of the weak-coupling integrands holds across relevant regimes, the method supplies a practical, sign-problem-free deterministic alternative to CT-QMC for nonequilibrium DMFT. The explicit benchmarks against exact results, direct CT-QMC comparisons, and controlled behavior away from half-filling constitute concrete evidence of utility. The absence of free parameters in the core approximation and the reproducible low-rank observations are notable strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1] §4.1 (exactly solvable benchmark): the reported tensor ranks and TCI truncation errors should be shown explicitly as a function of the number of time slices or expansion order to confirm that the observed agreement is not sensitive to post-hoc rank choices.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (Hubbard quench at 3/4 filling): the claim that the method 'remains well controlled' requires a quantitative statement of how the TCI error is bounded relative to the difference from half-filling results; without this the crossover interpretation rests on visual inspection alone.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3] Notation for the multi-dimensional integration variables and the precise definition of the tensor-train cores should be unified between the method section and the appendix.
  2. [Figs. 3-5] Figure captions for the quench dynamics should state the TCI bond dimension and maximum expansion order used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the constructive major comments. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.1] §4.1 (exactly solvable benchmark): the reported tensor ranks and TCI truncation errors should be shown explicitly as a function of the number of time slices or expansion order to confirm that the observed agreement is not sensitive to post-hoc rank choices.

    Authors: We agree that explicit dependence on these parameters would strengthen the evidence for robustness. The revised manuscript will add figures in §4.1 displaying tensor ranks and TCI truncation errors versus number of time slices and expansion order for the benchmark model, confirming that the reported agreement and low-rank structure hold without reliance on post-hoc rank selection. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (Hubbard quench at 3/4 filling): the claim that the method 'remains well controlled' requires a quantitative statement of how the TCI error is bounded relative to the difference from half-filling results; without this the crossover interpretation rests on visual inspection alone.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for a quantitative bound to support the claim. In the revision we will add to §4.2 an explicit estimate of the TCI truncation error (obtained from the convergence tolerance and its propagation to observables) and compare its magnitude directly to the differences between the 3/4-filling and half-filling quench results, thereby placing the crossover interpretation on a quantitative footing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript introduces a numerical impurity solver that combines the weak-coupling expansion with tensor cross interpolation to approximate high-dimensional integrands in nonequilibrium DMFT. All load-bearing steps consist of explicit algorithmic approximations whose accuracy is controlled by direct benchmarks against exactly solvable models and by side-by-side comparison with CT-QMC; the observed low tensor rank is reported as an empirical finding rather than imposed by definition or by a self-citation chain. No equation reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is invoked from prior author work, and the central claim (sign-problem mitigation via low-rank structure) remains independently falsifiable by the supplied numerical tests.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no identifiable free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method rests on standard numerical linear algebra and perturbation theory whose details are not supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5750 in / 1215 out tokens · 31123 ms · 2026-07-02T05:53:03.369025+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    connected

    Left-mixing Green ’s function In the case of an interaction quench from the nonin- teracting state, the evaluation of the left-mixing Green’s function does not require high-dimensional integrals [14]. To see this, we start from the right Dyson equation for the model (7), −i d dz′ +δµ Gσ(z, z′)− Z C d¯z Gσ(z,¯z)∆σ(¯z, z′) − Z C d¯z Gσ(z,¯z)Σσ(¯z, z′) =δ C(...

  2. [2]

    The parameterαis set toα= 0.5. After convergence, we evaluate the double occupancy d(t) =⟨n i↑(t)ni↓(t)⟩using d(t) =αn−α 2 − ∞X n=0 (iU) n 1X s1,···,s n=0 (−1) P ℓ sℓ Z S0,t n dt1 · · ·dt n detE < n↑(t,{t i},{s i})·detE < n↓(t,{t i},{s i}), (69) where the matrixE < nσ(t,{t i},{s i}) is defined as E< nσ(t,{t i},{s i}) =   G< σ (t, t)−iαG 0s1 σ (t, t1)...

    2000

  3. [3]

    Let us consider the matrix-valued functionA(t) defined on the interval 0≤t≤t max, and expand it in terms of the Chebyshev polynomialsT k(x) = cos(karccosx)

    Chebyshev polynomial expansion First, we briefly review the Chebyshev polynomial expansion. Let us consider the matrix-valued functionA(t) defined on the interval 0≤t≤t max, and expand it in terms of the Chebyshev polynomialsT k(x) = cos(karccosx). Since the Chebyshev polynomials are defined on the interval−1≤x≤1, it is convenient to introduce the rescale...

  4. [4]

    Computation of the convolution of two functions Let us consider the convolution of two matrix-valued functionsA(t) andB(t) defined on the interval 0≤t≤t max, C(t) = (A∗B)(t) = Z t 0 dt′ A(t−t ′)B(t′).(A7) Here we assume that we know the values ofA(t) andB(t) at the Chebyshev nodest (ℓ) (ℓ= 0,1,· · ·, N ch −1). Then, we can expandA(t) andB(t) in terms of t...

  5. [5]

    As we discussed in Sec

    Computation of the recursive convolution Let us consider evaluating an integral I(t) = Z S0,t n dt1 · · ·dt n F(t;t 1,· · ·, t n) (A15) for 0≤t≤t max. As we discussed in Sec. III B 1, we first introduce new time difference variablesu 1,· · ·, u n as u1 =t−t 1, u 2 =t 1 −t 2,· · ·, u n =t n−1 −t n (A16) and regardF(t;t 1,· · ·, t n) as a function oftandu 1...

  6. [6]

    We want an extrapolation procedure which ensures that the extrapolated function is differentiable att= 0 and decays exponentially ast→ −∞

    Extrapolation of single-variable functions Let us start with the extrapolation of a single-variable functionf(t) defined on [0, t max] to (−∞, tmax]. We want an extrapolation procedure which ensures that the extrapolated function is differentiable att= 0 and decays exponentially ast→ −∞. To this end, we introduce two functions, h1(t) = (1−λt)e λt, h 2(t) ...

  7. [7]

    The decomposition of the original and extrapolated domains is schematically shown in Fig

    Extrapolation of two-variable functions The extrapolation of a two-variable functionf(t, t ′) defined on [0, t max]2 to (−∞, t max]2 can be performed in a similar manner. The decomposition of the original and extrapolated domains is schematically shown in Fig. 19. We first extrapolate the function along thet-direction for each fixedt ′ ∈[0, t max] using t...

  8. [8]

    Giannetti, M

    C. Giannetti, M. Capone, D. Fausti, M. Fabrizio, F. Parmigiani, and D. Mihailovic, Ultrafast optical spectroscopy of strongly correlated materials and high- temperature superconductors: a non-equilibrium ap- proach, Advances in Physics65, 58 (2016). 28

    2016

  9. [9]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, Towards prop- erties on demand in quantum materials, Nature Materials 16, 1077 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  11. [11]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  12. [12]

    J¨ ordens, N

    R. J¨ ordens, N. Strohmaier, K. G¨ unter, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, A mott insulator of fermionic atoms in an optical lattice, Nature455, 204 (2008)

    2008

  13. [13]

    Schneider, L

    U. Schneider, L. Hackerm¨ uller, S. Will, T. Best, I. Bloch, T. A. Costi, R. W. Helmes, D. Rasch, and A. Rosch, Metallic and insulating phases of repulsively interacting fermions in a 3d optical lattice, Science322, 1520 (2008)

    2008

  14. [14]

    Fausti, R

    D. Fausti, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe- ordered cuprate, Science331, 189 (2011)

    2011

  15. [15]

    Stojchevska, I

    L. Stojchevska, I. Vaskivskyi, T. Mertelj, P. Kusar, D. Svetin, S. Brazovskii, and D. Mihailovic, Ultrafast switching to a stable hidden quantum state in an elec- tronic crystal, Science344, 177 (2014)

    2014

  16. [16]

    Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory of a strongly correlated system

    P. Schmidt and H. Monien, Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory of a strongly correlated system, arXiv preprint cond-mat/0202046 (2002)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  17. [17]

    J. K. Freericks, V. M. Turkowski, and V. Zlati´ c, Nonequi- librium dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 266408 (2006)

    2006

  18. [18]

    H. Aoki, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, T. Oka, and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 779 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    Eckstein and M

    M. Eckstein and M. Kollar, Nonthermal steady states after an interaction quench in the falicov-kimball model, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 120404 (2008)

    2008

  20. [20]

    Eckstein, M

    M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, and P. Werner, Thermalization after an interaction quench in the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 056403 (2009)

    2009

  21. [21]

    Eckstein, M

    M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, and P. Werner, Interaction quench in the hubbard model: Relaxation of the spec- tral function and the optical conductivity, Phys. Rev. B 81, 115131 (2010)

    2010

  22. [22]

    Eckstein, T

    M. Eckstein, T. Oka, and P. Werner, Dielectric break- down of mott insulators in dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 146404 (2010)

    2010

  23. [23]

    Werner, N

    P. Werner, N. Tsuji, and M. Eckstein, Nonthermal symmetry-broken states in the strongly interacting hub- bard model, Phys. Rev. B86, 205101 (2012)

    2012

  24. [24]

    Tsuji and P

    N. Tsuji and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory based on weak-coupling perturbation expansions: Application to dynamical symmetry break- ing in the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B88, 165115 (2013)

    2013

  25. [25]

    Tsuji, M

    N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Nonthermal anti- ferromagnetic order and nonequilibrium criticality in the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 136404 (2013)

    2013

  26. [26]

    A. N. Rubtsov, V. V. Savkin, and A. I. Lichten- stein, Continuous-time quantum monte carlo method for fermions, Phys. Rev. B72, 035122 (2005)

    2005

  27. [27]

    Werner, A

    P. Werner, A. Comanac, L. de’ Medici, M. Troyer, and A. J. Millis, Continuous-time solver for quantum impu- rity models, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 076405 (2006)

    2006

  28. [28]

    E. Gull, P. Werner, O. Parcollet, and M. Troyer, Continuous-time auxiliary-field monte carlo for quantum impurity models, Europhys. Lett.82, 57003 (2008)

    2008

  29. [29]

    M¨ uhlbacher and E

    L. M¨ uhlbacher and E. Rabani, Real-time path integral approach to nonequilibrium many-body quantum sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 176403 (2008)

    2008

  30. [30]

    Werner, T

    P. Werner, T. Oka, and A. J. Millis, Diagrammatic monte carlo simulation of nonequilibrium systems, Phys. Rev. B 79, 035320 (2009)

    2009

  31. [31]

    Werner, T

    P. Werner, T. Oka, M. Eckstein, and A. J. Millis, Weak-coupling quantum monte carlo calculations on the keldysh contour: Theory and application to the current- voltage characteristics of the anderson model, Phys. Rev. B81, 035108 (2010)

    2010

  32. [32]

    E. Gull, A. J. Millis, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, M. Troyer, and P. Werner, Continuous-time monte carlo methods for quantum impurity models, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 349 (2011)

    2011

  33. [33]

    Tsuji, T

    N. Tsuji, T. Oka, P. Werner, and H. Aoki, Dynamical band flipping in fermionic lattice systems: An ac-field- driven change of the interaction from repulsive to attrac- tive, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236401 (2011)

    2011

  34. [34]

    Eckstein and P

    M. Eckstein and P. Werner, Damping of bloch oscilla- tions in the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 186406 (2011)

    2011

  35. [35]

    Canovi, P

    E. Canovi, P. Werner, and M. Eckstein, First-order dy- namical phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 265702 (2014)

    2014

  36. [36]

    Oseledets and E

    I. Oseledets and E. Tyrtyshnikov, Tt-cross approxima- tion for multidimensional arrays, Linear Algebra Appl. 432, 70 (2010)

    2010

  37. [37]

    Oseledets, Tensor-train decomposition, SIAM J

    I. Oseledets, Tensor-train decomposition, SIAM J. Sci. Comput.33, 2295 (2011)

    2011

  38. [38]

    Savostyanov and I

    D. Savostyanov and I. Oseledets, Fast adaptive interpola- tion of multi-dimensional arrays in tensor train format, in The 2011 International Workshop on Multidimensional (nD) Systems(IEEE, 2011) pp. 1–8

    2011

  39. [39]

    D. V. Savostyanov, Quasioptimality of maximum-volume cross interpolation of tensors, Linear Algebra Appl.458, 217 (2014)

    2014

  40. [40]

    Dolgov and D

    S. Dolgov and D. Savostyanov, Parallel cross interpola- tion for high-precision calculation of high-dimensional in- tegrals, Comput. Phys. Commun.246, 106869 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    N´ u˜ nez Fern´ andez, M

    Y. N´ u˜ nez Fern´ andez, M. Jeannin, P. T. Dumitrescu, T. Kloss, J. Kaye, O. Parcollet, and X. Waintal, Learning feynman diagrams with tensor trains, Phys. Rev. X12, 041018 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    N´ u˜ nez Fern´ andez, M

    Y. N´ u˜ nez Fern´ andez, M. K. Ritter, M. Jeannin, J.-W. Li, T. Kloss, T. Louvet, S. Terasaki, O. Parcollet, J. von Delft, H. Shinaoka,et al., Learning tensor networks with tensor cross interpolation: new algorithms and libraries, SciPost Physics18, 104 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Erpenbeck, W.-T

    A. Erpenbeck, W.-T. Lin, T. Blommel, L. Zhang, S. Iskakov, L. Bernheimer, Y. N´ u˜ nez Fern´ andez, G. Co- hen, O. Parcollet, X. Waintal, and E. Gull, Tensor train continuous time solver for quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B107, 245135 (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Matsuura, H

    S. Matsuura, H. Shinaoka, P. Werner, and N. Tsuji, Ten- sor cross interpolation approach for quantum impurity problems based on the weak-coupling expansion, Phys. Rev. B111, 155150 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Ishida, N

    H. Ishida, N. Okada, S. Hoshino, and H. Shinaoka, Low- rank quantics tensor train representations of feynman di- agrams for multiorbital electron-phonon models, Phys. 29 Rev. Lett.135, 046502 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Jeannin, Y

    M. Jeannin, Y. N´ u˜ nez Fern´ andez, T. Kloss, O. Par- collet, and X. Waintal, Comprehensive study of out-of- equilibrium kondo effect and coulomb blockade, Phys. Rev. B112, 155159 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Eckstein, Solving quantum impurity models in the non-equilibrium steady state with tensor trains, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19707 (2024)

    M. Eckstein, Solving quantum impurity models in the non-equilibrium steady state with tensor trains, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19707 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    A. J. Kim and P. Werner, Strong coupling impurity solver based on quantics tensor cross interpolation, Phys. Rev. B111, 125120 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    L. Geng, A. J. Kim, and P. Werner, Third-order strong- coupling impurity solver for real-frequency dynamical mean field theory: Accurate spectral functions for anti- ferromagnetic and photodoped states, Phys. Rev. B112, 245119 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    L. Geng, S. Ray, and P. Werner, Photoinduced exci- tonic magnetism in a multiorbital hubbard system, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.27483 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    L. Geng, A. J. Kim, and P. Werner, High-temperature η-pairing superconductivity in the photodoped hubbard model, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.17238 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    K¨ unzel, A

    F. K¨ unzel, A. Erpenbeck, D. Werner, E. Arrigoni, E. Gull, G. Cohen, and M. Eckstein, Numerically ex- act simulation of photodoped mott insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176501 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proc

    J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A276, 238 (1963)

    1963

  54. [54]

    L. M. Falicov and J. C. Kimball, Simple model for semiconductor-metal transitions: Smb 6 and transition- metal oxides, Phys. Rev. Lett.22, 997 (1969)

    1969

  55. [55]

    J. K. Freericks and V. Zlati´ c, Exact dynamical mean-field theory of the falicov-kimball model, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 1333 (2003)

    2003

  56. [56]

    L. P. Kadanoff and G. Baym,Quantum Statistical Me- chanics(W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1962)

    1962

  57. [57]

    Danielewicz, Quantum theory of nonequilibrium pro- cesses, i, Ann

    P. Danielewicz, Quantum theory of nonequilibrium pro- cesses, i, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)152, 239 (1984)

    1984

  58. [58]

    Danielewicz, Quantum theory of nonequilibrium pro- cesses ii

    P. Danielewicz, Quantum theory of nonequilibrium pro- cesses ii. application to nuclear collisions, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)152, 305 (1984)

    1984

  59. [59]

    Wagner, Expansions of nonequilibrium green’s func- tions, Phys

    M. Wagner, Expansions of nonequilibrium green’s func- tions, Phys. Rev. B44, 6104 (1991)

    1991

  60. [60]

    Eckstein, A

    M. Eckstein, A. Hackl, S. Kehrein, M. Kollar, M. Moeckel, P. Werner, and F. A. Wolf, New theoret- ical approaches for correlated systems in nonequilibrium, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.180, 217 (2009)

    2009

  61. [61]

    Hershfield, J

    S. Hershfield, J. H. Davies, and J. W. Wilkins, Probing the kondo resonance by resonant tunneling through an anderson impurity, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 3720 (1991)

    1991

  62. [62]

    Hershfield, J

    S. Hershfield, J. H. Davies, and J. W. Wilkins, Resonant tunneling through an anderson impurity. i. current in the symmetric model, Phys. Rev. B46, 7046 (1992)

    1992

  63. [63]

    Fujii and K

    T. Fujii and K. Ueda, Perturbative approach to the nonequilibrium kondo effect in a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B68, 155310 (2003)

    2003

  64. [64]

    D. C. Langreth, inLinear and Nonlinear Electron Trans- port in Solids, edited by J. T. Devreese and V. E. van Doren (Plenum Press, New York, 1976)

    1976

  65. [65]

    Brunner and P

    H. Brunner and P. J. van der Houwen,The Numerical Solution of Volterra Equations(North-Holland, Amster- dam, 1986)

    1986

  66. [66]

    Linz,Analytical and Numerical Methods for Volterra Equations(SIAM, Philadelphia, 1985)

    P. Linz,Analytical and Numerical Methods for Volterra Equations(SIAM, Philadelphia, 1985)

    1985

  67. [67]

    W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery,Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1992)

    1992

  68. [68]

    Bonitz,Progress in Nonequilibrium Green ’s Functions (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000)

    M. Bonitz,Progress in Nonequilibrium Green ’s Functions (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000)

    2000

  69. [69]

    A. Stan, N. E. Dahlen, and R. van Leeuwen, Time prop- agation of the kadanoff–baym equations for inhomoge- neous systems, J. Chem. Phys.130, 224101 (2009)

    2009

  70. [70]

    Moeckel and S

    M. Moeckel and S. Kehrein, Interaction quench in the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 175702 (2008)

    2008

  71. [71]

    Schir´ o and M

    M. Schir´ o and M. Fabrizio, Time-dependent mean field theory for quench dynamics in correlated electron sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 076401 (2010)

    2010

  72. [72]

    Schir´ o and M

    M. Schir´ o and M. Fabrizio, Quantum quenches in the hubbard model: Time-dependent mean-field theory and the role of quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. B83, 165105 (2011)

    2011

  73. [73]

    S. A. Hamerla and G. S. Uhrig, Dynamical transition in interaction quenches of the one-dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B87, 064304 (2013)

    2013

  74. [74]

    Georges, L

    A. Georges, L. d. Medici, and J. Mravlje, Strong correla- tions from hund’s coupling, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics4, 137 (2013)

    2013

  75. [75]

    Werner, E

    P. Werner, E. Gull, M. Troyer, and A. J. Millis, Spin freezing transition and non-fermi-liquid self-energy in a three-orbital model, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 166405 (2008)

    2008

  76. [76]

    Ganahl, M

    M. Ganahl, M. Aichhorn, H. G. Evertz, P. Thunstr¨ om, K. Held, and F. Verstraete, Efficient dmft impurity solver using real-time dynamics with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B92, 155132 (2015)

    2015

  77. [77]

    Nayak, J

    M. Nayak, J. Thoenniss, M. Sonner, D. A. Abanin, and P. Werner, Steady-state dynamical mean field the- ory based on influence functional matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B112, 035103 (2025)

    2025

  78. [78]

    Bertrand, S

    C. Bertrand, S. Florens, O. Parcollet, and X. Wain- tal, Reconstructing nonequilibrium regimes of quantum many-body systems from the analytical structure of per- turbative expansions, Phys. Rev. X9, 041008 (2019)

    2019

  79. [79]

    Eckstein and P

    M. Eckstein and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field calculations based on the noncrossing approx- imation and its generalizations, Phys. Rev. B82, 115115 (2010)

    2010

  80. [80]

    Gramsch, K

    C. Gramsch, K. Balzer, M. Eckstein, and M. Kollar, Hamiltonian-based impurity solver for nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B88, 235106 (2013)

    2013

Showing first 80 references.