pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02305 · v1 · pith:65LHQM45new · submitted 2026-07-02 · 📡 eess.SP

Beyond Beamforming: Phase-and-Gain Channel Shaping via Rotatable Antenna Arrays

Xingxiang Peng , Qingqing Wu , Ziyuan Zheng , Wen Chen , Guangchi Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 07:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords rotatable antenna arraysphase-and-gain channel shapingmultiuser communicationweighted sum-rate maximizationzero-forcing analysisarray pose optimizationboresight steeringgeometric channel modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rotatable antenna arrays reshape multiuser channels by jointly adjusting pose and boresights to improve both phase responses and direction-dependent gains.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a rotatable antenna array enables geometry-reconfigurable transmission that goes beyond conventional beamforming by reshaping both array-induced phase responses and direction-dependent channel gains. It does this through joint optimization of transmit beamformers, overall array pose, and individual element boresights, subject to visibility and steering limits. A zero-forcing geometric analysis separates the contributions: array rotation improves user channel orthogonality, while directional elements trade phase separation against gain alignment. The resulting weighted sum-rate maximization yields higher rates than fixed-array or single-parameter adjustment baselines. Simulations show the gains grow with more directive element patterns and stricter boresight constraints.

Core claim

Joint optimization of transmit beamformers, array pose, and element boresights under visibility and steering constraints produces phase-and-gain channel shaping whose rate gains arise from simultaneous channel-strength enhancement and spatial-separability improvement, as identified by zero-forcing analysis and confirmed by outperformance over fixed-array, pose-only, and boresight-only benchmarks.

What carries the argument

The joint optimization framework that coordinates beamforming with array-pose adaptation and element-boresight steering, interpreted geometrically via zero-forcing to isolate phase orthogonality gains from gain-alignment gains.

If this is right

  • Array-pose rotation improves inter-user channel orthogonality even when elements are isotropic.
  • Directional elements introduce a tradeoff between phase-based spatial separation and boresight-dependent gain alignment.
  • The joint design produces larger rate gains when element patterns are more directive and when boresight steering is more tightly constrained.
  • The proposed method outperforms fixed-array, pose-only, and boresight-only baselines in the evaluated scenarios.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Element pattern directivity becomes a co-design variable that amplifies the value of geometric reconfiguration.
  • Mechanical constraints on pose and boresight range directly cap the achievable channel shaping, pointing to a hardware-performance tradeoff.
  • The separation of phase and gain effects in the zero-forcing view suggests similar geometric levers could be applied in other multiuser settings with movable apertures.

Load-bearing premise

The weighted sum-rate maximization problem admits an efficient solution under the visibility and steering constraints, and the zero-forcing analysis accurately attributes the observed rate gains to the combined phase and gain effects.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of weighted sum rates in a multiuser setup where the joint design fails to exceed the pose-only or boresight-only benchmarks under identical power, visibility, and steering constraints would falsify the claimed benefit of combined phase-and-gain shaping.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02305 by Guangchi Zhang, Qingqing Wu, Wen Chen, Xingxiang Peng, Ziyuan Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the proposed rotatable UPA for phase-and-gain channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Minimum achievable channel correlation vs. departure separation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Pose-induced spatial separability under isotropic elements with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Convergence behavior of the AO-based algorithm. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: WSR vs. the transmit power under directional elements with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: WSR vs. the antenna directivity factor. the joint design because the UPA pose and element boresights are coupled: the pose determines both the array-induced phase difference and the local user directions available for boresight alignment, while the boresights further refine the direction￾dependent gains. Notably, the fixed pose-and-boresight scheme performs even worse than the isotropic-element benchmark, … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper investigates geometry-reconfigurable transmission for multiuser communication systems enabled by a rotatable antenna array. In contrast to conventional fixed arrays, the proposed architecture jointly exploits array pose adjustment and element-level boresight steering, thereby reshaping both the array-induced phase responses and the direction-dependent channel gains. We formulate a weighted sum-rate maximization problem that jointly optimizes the transmit beamformers, array pose, and element boresights under practical visibility and steering constraints. To reveal the underlying design principles, we first provide a geometric interpretation via zero-forcing analysis, showing that the resulting rates stem from both channel-strength enhancement and spatial-separability improvement. Specifically, array-pose rotation improves inter-user channel orthogonality even with isotropic elements, whereas directional elements introduce a tradeoff between phase-based spatial separation and boresight-dependent gain alignment. Motivated by these insights, we develop an efficient optimization framework that jointly coordinates transmit beamforming, array-pose adaptation, and element-boresight steering to exploit the geometry-induced phase-and-gain channel-shaping capability. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed joint design outperforms fixed-array, pose-only, and boresight-only benchmarks, with larger gains achieved under more directive element patterns and tighter boresight-steering constraints.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a rotatable antenna array architecture for multiuser downlink systems that jointly optimizes array pose, element boresight directions, and transmit beamformers to maximize weighted sum-rate. It provides a geometric zero-forcing interpretation attributing performance gains to improved channel orthogonality (via pose) and gain alignment (via boresight), develops an efficient optimization framework respecting visibility and steering constraints, and reports simulation results showing the joint design outperforms fixed-array, pose-only, and boresight-only baselines, with larger gains for directive element patterns and tighter steering constraints.

Significance. If the optimization framework converges reliably and the reported gains are reproducible, the work introduces a new geometric degree of freedom for channel shaping that complements conventional beamforming. The zero-forcing geometric analysis offers insight into the distinct roles of phase and gain, which could guide future reconfigurable-antenna designs in interference-limited scenarios. The simulation comparisons against multiple benchmarks strengthen the practical relevance.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Geometric ZF Analysis): The claim that pose rotation improves inter-user orthogonality even for isotropic elements is central to separating phase and gain effects; the derivation should explicitly show how the effective channel matrix rank or condition number changes with rotation angle under the visibility constraint, as this underpins the rate improvement attribution.
  2. [§4] §4 (Optimization Framework): The weighted sum-rate problem is non-convex due to the coupled pose, boresight, and beamformer variables; the manuscript must specify the convergence criterion and iteration complexity of the proposed algorithm (e.g., alternating optimization or successive convex approximation) to substantiate the claim of an 'efficient' solution under the steering constraints.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Table 1] Table 1 (Simulation Parameters): The element pattern directivity values and the range of allowable boresight angles should be listed explicitly to allow reproduction of the reported gain trends.
  2. [Fig. 3] Fig. 3 (Rate vs. SNR curves): The legend should distinguish the four schemes (joint, fixed, pose-only, boresight-only) more clearly, and error bars or multiple random seeds should be indicated if the curves represent averages.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the recommendation for minor revision. The suggestions strengthen the clarity of the geometric analysis and the optimization details. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Geometric ZF Analysis): The claim that pose rotation improves inter-user orthogonality even for isotropic elements is central to separating phase and gain effects; the derivation should explicitly show how the effective channel matrix rank or condition number changes with rotation angle under the visibility constraint, as this underpins the rate improvement attribution.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on making the separation of phase and gain effects fully explicit. Section 3 already derives the geometric ZF rates by showing that pose rotation alters the phase terms in the effective channels to improve orthogonality even for isotropic elements. To address the request directly, the revised manuscript will add an explicit derivation of the condition number of the effective channel matrix as a function of rotation angle (under the visibility constraint), confirming the rank preservation and the resulting improvement in spatial separability independent of gain alignment. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Optimization Framework): The weighted sum-rate problem is non-convex due to the coupled pose, boresight, and beamformer variables; the manuscript must specify the convergence criterion and iteration complexity of the proposed algorithm (e.g., alternating optimization or successive convex approximation) to substantiate the claim of an 'efficient' solution under the steering constraints.

    Authors: We agree that additional specification of algorithmic properties is warranted to support the efficiency claim. The framework employs alternating optimization, with beamformers obtained in closed form for fixed geometry and pose/boresight variables updated via successive convex approximation. In the revision we will state the convergence criterion (relative change in the objective below a prescribed threshold) and provide the per-iteration complexity, including the cost of handling the visibility and steering constraints in each subproblem. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper formulates a weighted sum-rate maximization problem, provides a geometric zero-forcing analysis attributing gains to channel orthogonality and gain alignment, then develops an optimization framework and validates via simulations against fixed-array, pose-only, and boresight-only benchmarks. No quoted equations or steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the ZF interpretation and benchmark comparisons are presented as independent analysis and empirical checks. The derivation chain remains self-contained with external falsifiability through simulations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the optimization formulation and geometric analysis are described at high level only.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5759 in / 946 out tokens · 21106 ms · 2026-07-03T07:32:47.747423+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Intelligent surfaces empowered wireless network: Recent advances and the road to 6G,

    Q. Wuet al., “Intelligent surfaces empowered wireless network: Recent advances and the road to 6G,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 724–763, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    A tutorial on extremely large-scale MIMO for 6G: Fundamentals, signal processing, and applications,

    Z. Wanget al., “A tutorial on extremely large-scale MIMO for 6G: Fundamentals, signal processing, and applications,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tut., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1560–1605, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    A tutorial on near-field XL-MIMO communications toward 6G,

    H. Luet al., “A tutorial on near-field XL-MIMO communications toward 6G,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tut., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2213–2257, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Cell-free full-duplex communication—an overview,

    D. Galappaththige, M. Mohammadi, H. Q. Ngo, M. Matthaiou, and C. Tellambura, “Cell-free full-duplex communication—an overview,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 10 468–10 494, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Towards smart and reconfigurable environment: Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless network,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Towards smart and reconfigurable environment: Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless network,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 106–112, Jan. 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Active RIS vs. passive RIS: Which will prevail in 6G?

    Z. Zhanget al., “Active RIS vs. passive RIS: Which will prevail in 6G?” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1707–1725, Mar. 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    IRS-aided multi-cell massive MIMO systems with impairments: SE analysis and optimization,

    R. Munagalaet al., “IRS-aided multi-cell massive MIMO systems with impairments: SE analysis and optimization,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 5295–5312, Jul. 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Intelligent reflecting surfaces for wireless networks: Deployment architectures, key solutions, and field trials,

    Q. Wuet al., “Intelligent reflecting surfaces for wireless networks: Deployment architectures, key solutions, and field trials,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 141–148, Dec. 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,

    W. K. Newet al., “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tut., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2325– 2377, 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    A tutorial on movable antennas for wireless networks,

    L. Zhuet al., “A tutorial on movable antennas for wireless networks,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tut., vol. 28, pp. 3002–3054, 2026

    work page 2026

  11. [11]

    Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, Jun. 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    MIMO capacity characterization for movable antenna systems,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “MIMO capacity characterization for movable antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3392–3407, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Movable-antenna enhanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimization,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, B. Ning, and R. Zhang, “Movable-antenna enhanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimization,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7214–7229, 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Capacity maximization of uplink with fluid antenna system at both ends,

    B. Tanget al., “Capacity maximization of uplink with fluid antenna system at both ends,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 10 580–10 593, 2025

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Capacity maximization for fas-assisted multiple access channels,

    H. Xuet al., “Capacity maximization for fas-assisted multiple access channels,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 4713–4731, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Fluid antenna multiple access with simultaneous non- unique decoding in strong interference channel,

    F. R. Ghadiet al., “Fluid antenna multiple access with simultaneous non- unique decoding in strong interference channel,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 10 183–10 195, 2025

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Rotatable antenna enabled wireless communication and sensing: Opportunities and challenges,

    B. Zhenget al., “Rotatable antenna enabled wireless communication and sensing: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Wireless Commun., 2025, early access, doi: 10.1109/MWC.2025.3611919

    work page doi:10.1109/mwc.2025.3611919 2025

  18. [18]

    Rotatable antenna-enabled wireless communication: Modeling and optimization,

    B. Zheng, Q. Wu, T. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Rotatable antenna-enabled wireless communication: Modeling and optimization,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 6825–6842, 2026

    work page 2026

  19. [19]

    Rotatable antenna enabled spectrum sharing: Joint antenna orientation and beam- forming design,

    X. Peng, Q. Wu, Z. Zheng, W. Chen, Y . Zhu, and Y . Gao, “Rotatable antenna enabled spectrum sharing: Joint antenna orientation and beam- forming design,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 15 660– 15 674, Apr. 2026

    work page 2026

  20. [20]

    Low-altitude ISAC with rotatable active and passive arrays,

    Z. Zhenget al., “Low-altitude ISAC with rotatable active and passive arrays,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Sig. Process., 2026, early access, doi: 10. 1109/JSTSP.2026.3693227

    work page arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    UA V-aided mmwave massive MIMO broadcasting with rotatable antenna array,

    X. Zhang, L. Xiang, J. Wang, and X. Gao, “UA V-aided mmwave massive MIMO broadcasting with rotatable antenna array,”IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., 2026, early access, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2026.3696498

    work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2026.3696498 2026

  22. [22]

    Rotatable antenna array enabled UA V mmwave massive MIMO communication,

    X. Zhanget al., “Rotatable antenna array enabled UA V mmwave massive MIMO communication,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 1219–1236, 2026

    work page 2026

  23. [23]

    Efficient channel estimation for rotatable antenna- enabled wireless communication,

    X. Xionget al., “Efficient channel estimation for rotatable antenna- enabled wireless communication,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 3719–3723, Nov. 2025

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Joint antenna rotation and IRS beamforming for multi- user uplink communications,

    G. Zhanget al., “Joint antenna rotation and IRS beamforming for multi- user uplink communications,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 3219–3223, 2026

    work page 2026

  25. [25]

    Cell-Free MIMO with Rotatable Antennas: When Macro-Diversity Meets Antenna Directivity

    X. Penget al., “Cell-free MIMO with rotatable antennas: When macro- diversity meets antenna directivity,”arXiv preprint: 2601.16543, 2026, doi: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16543

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    C. A. Balanis,Antenna theory: Analysis and design. John Wiley & Sons, 2016

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    An iteratively weighted MMSE approach to distributed sum-utility maximization for a MIMO interfering broadcast channel,

    Q. Shi, M. Razaviyayn, Z.-Q. Luo, and C. He, “An iteratively weighted MMSE approach to distributed sum-utility maximization for a MIMO interfering broadcast channel,”IEEE Trans. Sig. Process., vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 4331–4340, Sept. 2011

    work page 2011