pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02470 · v1 · pith:53S2EJHNnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules on the transition boldsymbol{n=1 rightarrow 2}

Joy Dutta , Jeremy M. Hutson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 01:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords microwave shieldingultracold polar moleculesrotational transitionscollision preventionthree-body recombinationmolecular bound states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Microwave shielding on the n=1 to 2 transition prevents destructive collisions in ultracold polar molecules without forming bound states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that microwave fields tuned to the rotational transition from n=1 to n=2 can create a repulsive barrier that stops ultracold polar molecules from undergoing destructive close encounters. This shielding is slightly less efficient than the n=0 to 1 case but avoids producing two-molecule bound states at the required field strengths. Without those bound states, three-body recombination is not enhanced. The approach therefore removes the need for a second microwave field of different polarization to suppress losses. It offers a simpler route to maintaining stable ultracold molecular samples.

Core claim

We show that microwave shielding on the rotational transition n=1→2 can be effective in preventing destructive collisions between ultracold polar molecules. It is slightly less efficient than shielding on the transition 0→1, but has some important advantages. In particular, it does not produce 2-molecule bound states under the conditions needed for shielding, so it will not enhance 3-body recombination. It thus obviates the need for double-field microwave shielding using a second field of different polarization.

What carries the argument

Microwave dressing on the n=1 to n=2 rotational transition that induces a long-range repulsive intermolecular potential.

If this is right

  • Microwave shielding on n=1→2 prevents destructive collisions between ultracold polar molecules.
  • The method is slightly less efficient than shielding on the n=0→1 transition.
  • No two-molecule bound states form under the shielding conditions.
  • Three-body recombination rates are not increased.
  • Double-field microwave shielding with a second field of different polarization is not required.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Single-field shielding on this transition simplifies the microwave setup needed for stable ultracold molecule experiments.
  • The absence of bound states supports the use of this method at higher molecular densities without added recombination losses.

Load-bearing premise

The model calculations correctly predict both the shielding effectiveness and the absence of bound states for the n=1 to 2 transition under the relevant microwave fields and interaction conditions.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures either high collision loss rates or the presence of two-molecule bound states when microwaves are applied on the n=1 to 2 transition at the shielding parameters would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02470 by Jeremy M. Hutson, Joy Dutta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Monomer interaction picture for microwave dressing on the transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Rate coefficients for elastic scattering (solid lines) and total loss (dashed lines) as a function of Ω at (a) ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Real part [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Adiabats [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Incoming s-wave adiabats [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Rate coefficients for elastic scattering (solid lines) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that microwave shielding on the rotational transition $n=1\rightarrow 2$ can be effective in preventing destructive collisions between ultracold polar molecules. It is slightly less efficient than shielding on the transition $0\rightarrow 1$, but has some important advantages. In particular, it does not produce 2-molecule bound states under the conditions needed for shielding, so it will not enhance 3-body recombination. It thus obviates the need for double-field microwave shielding using a second field of different polarization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that microwave shielding on the n=1→2 rotational transition of ultracold polar molecules suppresses inelastic collisions effectively, though slightly less so than the n=0→1 transition. It further asserts that this scheme produces no two-molecule bound states at the required dressing parameters, thereby avoiding enhanced three-body recombination rates and removing the necessity for a second microwave field of orthogonal polarization.

Significance. If the numerical scattering and bound-state calculations hold, the result offers a technically simpler route to long-lived ultracold molecular samples. The absence of bound states under shielding conditions is a concrete advantage over prior single-field schemes and could reduce experimental overhead in quantum-degenerate molecular gases.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that shielding on n=1→2 is 'slightly less efficient' than on 0→1 without quoting a numerical ratio of loss rates or elastic-to-inelastic cross sections; adding a quantitative comparison in the abstract or a dedicated results paragraph would strengthen the claim.
  2. [Title and Abstract] Notation for the rotational quantum number alternates between n and N in the title and abstract; consistent use of one symbol throughout would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their supportive summary of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee accurately captures our central claims regarding the effectiveness of microwave shielding on the n=1→2 transition, its comparison to n=0→1, and the absence of two-molecule bound states that would enhance three-body recombination. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's claims rest on direct numerical evaluation of the microwave-dressed Hamiltonian for the n=1→2 transition, producing scattering loss rates and a bound-state spectrum. These outputs are obtained from the same Schrödinger equation solved for both shielding efficiency and the absence of two-body bound states; neither quantity is fitted to the other or renamed as a prediction. No self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that the present work then treats as external. The reported advantage (no bound states under shielding conditions) follows from the eigenvalue search itself and is independent of any prior result by the same authors. The derivation is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Insufficient information in the abstract to identify free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5610 in / 988 out tokens · 35597 ms · 2026-07-03T01:42:26.312226+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    For each value ofm tot, the splitting between the dressed states is the effective Rabi frequency Ωeff = √ Ω2 + ∆2, which follows Ωmtot=−1 eff >Ω mtot=0 eff >Ω mtot=1 eff . B. Coupled-channel formalism for microwave shielding The Hamiltonian that describes a two-body collision in the center-of-mass frame is ˆH= ℏ2 2µred − 1 R d2 dR2 R+ ˆL 2 R2 ! + ˆhA + ˆh...

  2. [2]

    Reduced scattering properties are defined as ˜α= α/R3, ˜β=β/R 3, ˜σ=σ/(4πR 2 3), and ˜k=k/k 3, where k3 = 4πR3ℏ/µred

    are the scaling factors for length and energy, respectively [16]. Reduced scattering properties are defined as ˜α= α/R3, ˜β=β/R 3, ˜σ=σ/(4πR 2 3), and ˜k=k/k 3, where k3 = 4πR3ℏ/µred. The two-body collision properties of microwave- shielded molecules are universal [44]. When Ω,∆≪ brot/ℏ, the shielding physics is dominated by channels within an energy wind...

  3. [3]

    Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ultracold molecules

    S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, and K. R. A. Hazzard. “Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ultracold molecules.” Nat. Phys.,20, 730 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Quan- tum magnetism with ultracold molecules

    M. L. Wall, K. R. A. Hazzard, and A. M. Rey. “Quan- tum magnetism with ultracold molecules.” In S. A. Ma- linovskaya and I. Novikova (Editors), “From Atomic to Mesoscale,” (World Scientific, Singapore, 2015), chap- ter 1, 3–37

    2015

  5. [5]

    Univer- sal few-body physics and cluster formation

    C. H. Greene, P. Giannakeas, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos. “Univer- sal few-body physics and cluster formation.” Rev. Mod. Phys.,89, 035006 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases

    T. Lahaye, C. Menotti, L. Santos, M. Lewenstein, and T. Pfau. “The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases.” Rep. Prog. Phys.,72, 126401 (2009)

    2009

  7. [7]

    Condensed matter theory of dipolar quantum gases

    M. A. Baranov, M. Dalmonte, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller. “Condensed matter theory of dipolar quantum gases.” Chem. Rev.,112, 5012 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Bimolecular chemistry in the ul- tracold regime

    Y. Liu and K.-K. Ni. “Bimolecular chemistry in the ul- tracold regime.” Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.,73, 73 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    Ultracold chemistry as a testbed for few-body physics

    T. Karman, M. Tomza, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıoz. “Ultracold chemistry as a testbed for few-body physics.” Nature Physics,20, 722 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Scattering of ultracold molecules in the highly resonant regime

    M. Mayle, G. Qu´ em´ ener, B. P. Ruzic, and J. L. Bohn. “Scattering of ultracold molecules in the highly resonant regime.” Phys. Rev. A,87, 012709 (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    Photoinduced two-body loss of ultra- cold molecules

    A. Christianen, M. W. Zwierlein, G. C. Groenenboom, and T. Karman. “Photoinduced two-body loss of ultra- cold molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,123, 123402 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Quantum-state controlled chemical reactions of ultracold KRb molecules

    S. Ospelkaus, K.-K. Ni, D. Wang, M. H. G. de Miranda, B. Neyenhuis, G. Qu´ em´ ener, P. S. Julienne, J. L. Bohn, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye. “Quantum-state controlled chemical reactions of ultracold KRb molecules.” Science,327, 853 (2010)

    2010

  13. [13]

    Direct observation of bi- molecular reactions of ultracold KRb molecules

    M.-G. Hu, Y. Liu, D. D. Grimes, Y.-W. Lin, A. H. Gheorghe, R. Vexiau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, O. Dulieu, T. Rosenband, and K.-K. Ni. “Direct observation of bi- molecular reactions of ultracold KRb molecules.” Sci- ence,366, 1111 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Controlling the quantum stereodynamics of ultra- cold bimolecular reactions

    M. H. G. de Miranda, A. Chotia, B. Neyenhuis, D. Wang, G. Qu´ em´ ener, S. Ospelkaus, J. L. Bohn, J. Ye, and D. S. Jin. “Controlling the quantum stereodynamics of ultra- cold bimolecular reactions.” Nat. Phys.,7, 502 (2011)

    2011

  15. [15]

    Dipolar evaporation of reac- tive molecules to below the Fermi temperature

    G. Valtolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J.-R. Li, L. De Marco, and J. Ye. “Dipolar evaporation of reac- tive molecules to below the Fermi temperature.” Nature, 588, 239 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Suppres- sion of inelastic collisions of polar 1Σ state molecules in an electrostatic field

    A. V. Avdeenkov, M. Kajita, and J. L. Bohn. “Suppres- sion of inelastic collisions of polar 1Σ state molecules in an electrostatic field.” Phys. Rev. A,73, 022707 (2006)

    2006

  17. [17]

    Tuning ultracold collisions of excited rotational dipolar molecules

    G. Wang and G. Qu´ em´ ener. “Tuning ultracold collisions of excited rotational dipolar molecules.” New J. Phys., 17, 035015 (2015)

    2015

  18. [18]

    Adimensional theory of shielding in ultracold collisions of dipolar rotors

    M. L. Gonz´ alez-Mart´ ınez, J. L. Bohn, and G. Qu´ em´ ener. “Adimensional theory of shielding in ultracold collisions of dipolar rotors.” Phys. Rev. A,96, 032718 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    Shielding collisions of ultracold CaF molecules with static electric fields

    B. Mukherjee, M. D. Frye, C. R. Le Sueur, M. R. Tarbutt, and J. M. Hutson. “Shielding collisions of ultracold CaF molecules with static electric fields.” Phys. Rev. Res.,5, 033097 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Controlling collisional loss and scattering lengths of ultracold dipolar molecules with static electric fields

    B. Mukherjee and J. M. Hutson. “Controlling collisional loss and scattering lengths of ultracold dipolar molecules with static electric fields.” Phys. Rev. Res.,6, 013145 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules

    T. Karman and J. M. Hutson. “Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,121, 163401 (2018). 9

    2018

  22. [22]

    Controlling the scat- tering length of ultracold dipolar molecules

    L. Lassabli` ere and G. Qu´ em´ ener. “Controlling the scat- tering length of ultracold dipolar molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,121, 163402 (2018)

    2018

  23. [23]

    Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules with imperfectly circular polar- ization

    T. Karman and J. M. Hutson. “Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules with imperfectly circular polar- ization.” Phys. Rev. A,100, 052704 (2019)

    2019

  24. [24]

    Microwave shielding with far-from-circular polarization

    T. Karman. “Microwave shielding with far-from-circular polarization.” Phys. Rev. A,101, 042702 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    Resonant and first-order dipolar interactions between ultracold 1Σ molecules in static and microwave electric fields

    T. Karman, Z. Z. Yan, and M. Zwierlein. “Resonant and first-order dipolar interactions between ultracold 1Σ molecules in static and microwave electric fields.” Phys. Rev. A,105, 013321 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Effective potential and superfluidity of microwave-shielded polar molecules

    F. Deng, X.-Y. Chen, X.-Y. Luo, W. Zhang, S. Yi, and T. Shi. “Effective potential and superfluidity of microwave-shielded polar molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 130, 183001 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Resonant collisional shielding of reactive molecules using electric fields

    K. Matsuda, L. De Marco, J.-R. Li, W. G. Tobias, G. Val- tolina, G. Qu´ em´ ener, and J. Ye. “Resonant collisional shielding of reactive molecules using electric fields.” Sci- ence,370, 1324 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    Tuning of dipolar interactions and evaporative cooling in a three- dimensional molecular quantum gas

    J.-R. Li, W. G. Tobias, K. Matsuda, C. Miller, G. Val- tolina, L. De Marco, R. R. W. Wang, L. Lassabli` ere, G. Qu´ em´ ener, J. L. Bohn, and J. Ye. “Tuning of dipolar interactions and evaporative cooling in a three- dimensional molecular quantum gas.” Nat. Phys.,17, 1144 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    Evaporation of microwave-shielded polar molecules to quantum degen- eracy

    A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, T. Karman, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo. “Evaporation of microwave-shielded polar molecules to quantum degen- eracy.” Nature,607, 677 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    Collisionally stable gas of bosonic dipolar ground-state molecules

    N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Steven- son, T. Karman, and S. Will. “Collisionally stable gas of bosonic dipolar ground-state molecules.” Nat. Phys.,19, 1579 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Microwave shielding of bosonic NaRb molecules

    J. Lin, G. Chen, M. Jin, Z. Shi, F. Deng, W. Zhang, G. Qu´ em´ ener, T. Shi, S. Yi, and D. Wang. “Microwave shielding of bosonic NaRb molecules.” Phys. Rev. X,13, 031032 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will. “Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules.” Nature,631, 289 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Bose-Einstein condensate of ultracold sodium-rubidium molecules with tunable dipolar inter- actions

    Z. Shi, Z. Huang, F. Deng, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, T. Shi, and D. Wang. “Bose-Einstein condensate of ultracold sodium-rubidium molecules with tunable dipolar inter- actions.” arXiv:2508.20518 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Dipolar droplets of strongly interacting molecules

    T. Langen, J. Boronat, J. S´ anchez-Baena, R. Bomb´ ın, T. Karman, and F. Mazzanti. “Dipolar droplets of strongly interacting molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,134, 053001 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Bose-Einstein con- densates of microwave-shielded polar molecules

    W.-J. Jin, F. Deng, S. Yi, and T. Shi. “Bose-Einstein con- densates of microwave-shielded polar molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,134, 233003 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    From few- to many-body physics: Strongly dipolar molecular Bose-Einstein con- densates and quantum fluids

    A. Schindewolf, J. Hertkorn, I. Stevenson, M. Ciardi, P. Gross, D. Wang, T. Karman, G. Qu´ em´ ener, S. Will, T. Pohl, and T. Langen. “From few- to many-body physics: Strongly dipolar molecular Bose-Einstein con- densates and quantum fluids.” arXiv:2512.14511 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Observation of self-bound droplets of ultracold dipolar molecules

    S. Zhang, W. Yuan, N. Bigagli, H. Kwak, T. Kar- man, I. Stevenson, and S. Will. “Observation of self-bound droplets of ultracold dipolar molecules.” arXiv:2507.15208 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Supersolid phases in ultracold gases of mi- crowave shielded polar molecules

    W. Zhang, H. Liu, F. Deng, K. Chen, S. Yi, and T. Shi. “Supersolid phases in ultracold gases of mi- crowave shielded polar molecules.” arXiv:2506.23820 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Ex- ploring molecular supersolidity via exact and mean-field theories: single microwave shielding

    T. A. Cardinale, T. Bland, and S. M. Reimann. “Ex- ploring molecular supersolidity via exact and mean-field theories: single microwave shielding.” arXiv:2509.18051 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Observation of generalized t-Jspin dynamics with tunable dipolar interactions

    A. N. Carroll, H. Hirzler, C. Miller, D. Wellnitz, S. R. Muleady, J. Lin, K. P. Zamarski, R. R. W. Wang, J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye. “Observation of generalized t-Jspin dynamics with tunable dipolar interactions.” Sci- ence,388, 381 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    SU(N) magnetism with ultracold molecules

    B. Mukherjee, J. M. Hutson, and K. R. A. Hazzard. “SU(N) magnetism with ultracold molecules.” New J. Phys.,27, 013013 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Two- and many-body physics of ultracold molecules dressed by dual microwave fields

    F. Deng, X. Hu, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, and T. Shi. “Two- and many-body physics of ultracold molecules dressed by dual microwave fields.” Nat. Commun.,16, 11219 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Double microwave shielding

    T. Karman, N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Steven- son, and S. Will. “Double microwave shielding.” PRX Quantum,6, 020358 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Effective anisotropic interaction potentials for pairs of ultracold molecules shielded by a static electric field

    B. Mukherjee, L. Santos, and J. M. Hutson. “Effective anisotropic interaction potentials for pairs of ultracold molecules shielded by a static electric field.” New J. Phys.,27, 093204 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Quasi- universal dipolar scattering in cold and ultracold gases

    J. L. Bohn, M. Cavagnero, and C. Ticknor. “Quasi- universal dipolar scattering in cold and ultracold gases.” New J. Phys.,11, 055039 (2009)

    2009

  46. [46]

    Universality in the microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules

    J. Dutta, B. Mukherjee, and J. M. Hutson. “Universality in the microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules.” Phys. Rev. Res,7, 023164 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Linking ultracold polar molecules

    A. V. Avdeenkov and J. L. Bohn. “Linking ultracold polar molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,90, 043006 (2003)

    2003

  48. [48]

    Electroas- sociation of ultracold dipolar molecules into tetramer field-linked states

    G. Qu´ em´ ener, J. L. Bohn, and J. F. E. Croft. “Electroas- sociation of ultracold dipolar molecules into tetramer field-linked states.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,131, 043402 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    Field-linked resonances of polar molecules

    X.-Y. Chen, A. Schindewolf, S. Eppelt, R. Bause, M. Duda, S. Biswas, T. Karman, T. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo. “Field-linked resonances of polar molecules.” Nature,614, 59 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    Ultracold field-linked tetratomic molecules

    X.-Y. Chen, S. Biswas, S. Eppelt, A. Schindewolf, F. Deng, T. Shi, S. Yi, T. A. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.- Y. Luo. “Ultracold field-linked tetratomic molecules.” Nature,626, 283 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Three- body recombination of ultracold microwave-shielded po- lar molecules

    I. Stevenson, S. Singh, A. Elkamshishy, N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, C. H. Greene, and S. Will. “Three- body recombination of ultracold microwave-shielded po- lar molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,133, 263402 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Tuning interactions between static-field- shielded polar molecules with microwaves

    C. J. Ho, J. Dutta, B. Mukherjee, J. M. Hutson, and M. R. Tarbutt. “Tuning interactions between static-field- shielded polar molecules with microwaves.” Phys. Rev. Res.,8, 023087 (2026)

    2026

  53. [53]

    Bound-state-free F¨ orster reso- nant shielding of strongly dipolar ultracold molecules

    R. R. W. Wang. “Bound-state-free F¨ orster reso- nant shielding of strongly dipolar ultracold molecules.” arXiv:2601.21928 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Controlled symmetry breaking of the Fermi surface in ultracold po- lar molecules

    S. Biswas, S. Eppelt, W. Tian, W. Zhang, F. Deng, C. Frank, T. Shi, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo. “Controlled symmetry breaking of the Fermi surface in ultracold po- lar molecules.” (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg. Atom-Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Applica- tions(Wiley, New York, 1998)

    1998

  56. [56]

    Controlling colli- sional spin relaxation of cold molecules with microwave laser fields

    S. V. Alyabyshev and R. V. Krems. “Controlling colli- sional spin relaxation of cold molecules with microwave laser fields.” Phys. Rev. A,80, 033419 (2009). 10

    2009

  57. [57]

    Chemical reactions dominated by long-range intermolecular forces

    D. C. Clary and J. P. Henshaw. “Chemical reactions dominated by long-range intermolecular forces.” Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc.,84, 333 (1987)

    1987

  58. [58]

    L. M. C. Janssen.Cold collision dynamics of NH radicals. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen (2012)

    2012

  59. [59]

    molscat: a pro- gram for non-reactive quantum scattering calculations on atomic and molecular collisions

    J. M. Hutson and C. R. Le Sueur. “molscat: a pro- gram for non-reactive quantum scattering calculations on atomic and molecular collisions.” Comp. Phys. Comm., 241, 9 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    molscat,boundand field, version 2025.0

    J. M. Hutson and C. R. Le Sueur. “molscat,boundand field, version 2025.0.”https://github.com/molscat/ molscat(2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    Feshbach resonances in ultracold atomic and molecular collisions: threshold behaviour and sup- pression of poles in scattering lengths

    J. M. Hutson. “Feshbach resonances in ultracold atomic and molecular collisions: threshold behaviour and sup- pression of poles in scattering lengths.” New J. Phys.,9, 152 (2007)

    2007

  62. [62]

    Molecular beam electric deflection and resonance spectroscopy of the heteronuclear alkali dimers: 39K7Li, Rb 7Li, 39K23Na, Rb23Na, and 133Cs23Na

    P. J. Dagdigian and L. Wharton. “Molecular beam electric deflection and resonance spectroscopy of the heteronuclear alkali dimers: 39K7Li, Rb 7Li, 39K23Na, Rb23Na, and 133Cs23Na.” J. Chem. Phys.,57, 1487 (1972)

    1972

  63. [63]

    The coupling of the X 1Σ+ and a 3Σ+ states of the atom pair Na + Cs and modelling cold collisions

    O. Docenko, M. Tamanis, J. Zaharova, R. Ferber, A. Pashov, H. Kn¨ ockel, and E. Tiemann. “The coupling of the X 1Σ+ and a 3Σ+ states of the atom pair Na + Cs and modelling cold collisions.” J. Phys. B - At. Mol. Opt.,39, S929 (2006)

    2006

  64. [64]

    Creation of an ultracold gas of ground-state dipolar 23Na87Rb molecules

    M. Guo, B. Zhu, B. Lu, X. Ye, F. Wang, R. Vex- iau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, G. Qu´ em´ ener, O. Dulieu, and D. Wang. “Creation of an ultracold gas of ground-state dipolar 23Na87Rb molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,116, 205303 (2016)

    2016

  65. [65]

    High-resolution internal state control of ultracold 23Na87Rb molecules

    M. Guo, X. Ye, J. He, G. Qu´ em´ ener, and D. Wang. “High-resolution internal state control of ultracold 23Na87Rb molecules.” Phys. Rev. A,97, 020501(R) (2018)

    2018

  66. [66]

    Highly polar molecules consisting of a copper or silver atom interacting with an alkali-metal or alkaline-earth-metal atom

    M. ´Smia lkowski and M. Tomza. “Highly polar molecules consisting of a copper or silver atom interacting with an alkali-metal or alkaline-earth-metal atom.” Phys. Rev. A,103, 022802 (2021)

    2021