Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 62 references

Avoiding a line-of-sight obstacle via deep sub-Rayleigh shadow-projection utilizing space-time wave packets

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Space-time wave packets cast transverse shadows that close up over axial distances tens to hundreds of times shorter than the ordinary Rayleigh length.

desk verdict Clean experimental demo that STWP dual scales turn a transverse null into a deep sub-Rayleigh axial shadow (25–250× shorter), letting you dodge an obstacle and still hit a target just behind it. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.02752 v1 pith:BSZI2JIL submitted 2026-07-02 physics.optics

Layton A. Hall , Bryan L. Turo , Ayman F. Abouraddy This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords space-timewavepacketsshadowprojectionsub-Rayleighline-of-sightobstacleavoidancediffraction-freebeamsopticalself-healingspatiotemporalcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that a space-time wave packet—an optical field in which every spatial frequency is locked to one wavelength—can project a transverse null onto an intervening obstacle and then recover its on-axis intensity after only a short axial distance. Conventional beams cast an accompanying axial shadow whose length scales as the square of the transverse width divided by wavelength; the packet replaces that quadratic dependence with a product of the obstacle width and a much smaller internal feature size of the packet. Laboratory and corridor measurements confirm reduction factors between roughly 25 and 250 for shadows ranging from 80 µm to 48 mm wide. The practical consequence is that a beam can miss a line-of-sight obstacle yet still illuminate a target lying only a short distance beyond it, which is useful for radiation therapy, free-space links, photolithography and laser machining.

What carries the argument

The dual independent transverse scales of a space-time wave packet: an outer aperture W_ST fixed by residual spatial uncertainty and a narrow central feature Δx_ST fixed by the full spatial bandwidth. After the temporal spectrum is traced out, the time-averaged intensity is governed by a double-branched spatial coherence function that keeps these two scales decoupled, allowing a wide beam to support a high spatial bandwidth and therefore a short axial shadow.

What would settle it

Fix the transverse shadow width and deliberately detune the spectral tilt angle well away from 45°; if the measured axial recovery distance lengthens back toward the ordinary Rayleigh value, the dual-scale decoupling claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

When a space-time wave packet is used as the illumination field, a transverse null of width W_s produces an axial shadow whose length is set by the product W_s Δx_ST / λ_o rather than by the conventional Rayleigh length W_s² / λ_o. Because the packet’s internal feature size Δx_ST can be made far smaller than W_s, measured axial shadows are reduced by factors of 25–250 across nearly three orders of magnitude in transverse width (80 µm to 48 mm).

Load-bearing premise

The shortened axial-shadow formula assumes the spectral tilt angle stays near 45°, so the two transverse scales remain fully independent and the time-averaged intensity follows the double-branched coherence function.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A coherent beam can avoid a line-of-sight obstacle while still illuminating a target only a short distance beyond it.
  • Radiation therapy can spare intervening sensitive tissue without lengthening the treatment path.
  • Free-space optical or wireless links can route around blockages with reduced dead zones.
  • Selective three-dimensional photolithography and laser machining can protect regions immediately adjacent to the work plane.
  • Stand-off detection can discriminate contiguous targets separated by sub-Rayleigh distances.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Any field that possesses two independent transverse scales (partially coherent Gaussian-Schell beams or monochromatic Bessel beams) should produce the same sub-Rayleigh axial recovery.
  • Compact rotated-chirped volume Bragg gratings could replace the laboratory SLM synthesizer, making the method field-deployable.
  • Extending synthesis to both transverse dimensions would allow fully three-dimensional obstacle avoidance without cylindrical symmetry.
  • Operating far from 45° tilt would trade shadow reduction for controllable group velocity, opening Doppler or ranging uses.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript shows that space-time wave packets (STWPs), whose time-averaged intensity is governed by a double-branched spatial coherence function with two independent transverse scales (outer width W_ST set by spectral uncertainty δk_x and central feature Δx_ST set by full bandwidth Δk_x), can project a transverse null of width W_s that heals over an axial distance z_ST,s ~ W_s Δx_ST/λ_o (Eq. 7) rather than the conventional Rayleigh length z_G,s ~ W_s^{2}/λ_o. Theory (Eqs. 1–8) follows from the STWP angular spectrum and the traced-out coherence function for spectral tilt angles near 45°. Experiments with interleaved and non-interleaved SLM phases, three imaging systems (5 imes demagnification, 1 imes relay, 10 imes magnification), and both table-top and ~40 m corridor measurements span W_s = 80 µm–48 mm and report measured reduction factors η_ST,G ≈ 25–250 relative to a Gaussian beam at λ_o ≈ 1 µm, with data tracking the predicted linear scaling (Fig. 11).

Significance. If the dual-scale mechanism holds, the work supplies a practical route to LoS obstacle avoidance while still illuminating a nearby on-axis target—something curved-trajectory beams cannot do. The experimental span of nearly three decades in W_s, the corridor-scale validation, and the direct comparison to Gaussian shadows constitute a strong, falsifiable demonstration. The result is immediately relevant to free-space optical links, photodynamic therapy, 3-D lithography and laser machining. The paper builds cleanly on prior STWP literature without circular re-fitting of earlier constants; the measured axial extents are independent experimental facts.

minor comments (5)
  1. §V.B and Fig. 9: measured z_ST,s ≈ 60 mm versus theoretical estimate 42 mm for W_s = 1.6 mm (and analogous offsets elsewhere). A short paragraph quantifying how residual δk_x, finite heta offset, or imaging aberrations produce these offsets would strengthen the quantitative claim without altering the order-of-magnitude conclusion.
  2. Fig. 10 caption and surrounding text: the corridor measurements for the 16 mm and 48 mm shadows are described twice with nearly identical wording; a single concise statement would improve readability.
  3. §III.A, Eq. (6) and §III.B, Eq. (7): the product formulas are stated for heta near 45°. A brief note (or reference) on the modified scaling when heta departs significantly from 45° would help readers who wish to operate at other spectral tilt angles.
  4. Discussion: the suggestion that a monochromatic Bessel beam or a Gaussian-Schell field could also satisfy the two desiderata is left qualitative. A single sentence estimating the expected reduction factor for a realistic Bessel beam would make the comparison more concrete.
  5. Typographical: “obstacle-a voidance” appears with a space in several section headings; “W A VE” is similarly split. Standardize throughout.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: dual-scale product formula imported via self-citation but experimental shadow lengths are independent measurements that track the predicted linear scaling without re-fitting.

  1. self citation load bearing [§III.A, Eq. 6 and surrounding text]
    "It can be shown that when θ→45°, the diffraction-free length for an STWP is [41, 42]: z_ST ∼ W_ST Δx_ST / λ_o ; a different formula applies when θ deviates significantly from 45° [36]."

    The product formula that underpins the subsequent shadow-length claim (Eq. 7) is imported solely by citation to the authors' own prior STWP papers rather than re-derived from the angular spectrum given in the present text. The step is only mildly load-bearing: the experimental measurements of short axial shadows remain independent of that citation and do not rely on re-fitting its constants.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental claim (measured axial shadow extents z_ST,s for transverse nulls of width W_s spanning 80 µm–48 mm, with reduction factors 25–250 relative to W_s²/λ_o) is self-contained and does not reduce by construction to any fitted parameter of this work. Δx_ST is measured from the unobstructed STWP central feature; z_ST,s is then measured independently by scanning the intensity profile and compared to the product formula. Minor numerical offsets (e.g., 60 mm measured vs 42 mm predicted) are reported openly and do not force agreement. The only mild self-citation is the product form z_ST ~ W_ST Δx_ST/λ_o (Eq. 6) taken from the authors' prior STWP literature and then applied by direct analogy to the shadow (Eq. 7). That formula is not re-derived from first principles here, yet it is not load-bearing for the existence of the short shadows themselves, which stand as new data. No self-definitional loop, no fitted-input-called-prediction, no uniqueness theorem, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern occur. Score 1 reflects only the non-critical self-citation of the scaling formula.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the established free-space STWP dispersion relation and the classical-entanglement argument that tracing over the tightly correlated temporal spectrum yields an effectively partially coherent spatial intensity. No new free parameters are fitted to force the sub-Rayleigh result; experimental choices (θ, Δλ, Δx_ST) set the scale but are independently measured. No novel entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • spectral tilt angle offset δθ
    Chosen near 0.05° (θ = 45.05°) to keep the STWP near the light-line while still providing finite Δx_ST; enters the reduction-factor formula η_ST,G (Eq. 8) but is measured from the SLM phase rather than fitted to shadow data.
  • central feature width Δx_ST
    Set by the programmed spatial bandwidth Δk_x on the SLM (12–640 µm across experiments); used both to predict z_ST,s and to report the measured reduction, so it is an experimental control rather than a post-hoc fit.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Free-space dispersion k_x² + k_z² = (ω/c)² together with the linear STWP constraint Ω = (k_z – k_o)c tan θ yields the parabolic spectrum of Eq. 2.
    Standard STWP construction (Kondakci & Abouraddy 2017); invoked throughout §III.
  • domain assumption Tracing over the temporal spectrum of a field with tight space-time correlations produces a purely spatial coherence function that governs the propagation of the time-averaged intensity (classical entanglement).
    Cited from Kondakci et al. Opt. Lett. 2019 and Yessenov et al.; used to justify the double-branched G̃(k_x,k'_x) of Eq. 4–5 and the two independent length scales.
  • domain assumption For θ near 45° the diffraction-free length of an STWP is z_ST ~ W_ST Δx_ST / λ_o (Eq. 6).
    Taken from prior STWP literature (Hall et al. 2022, Yessenov et al.); the shadow formula Eq. 7 is obtained by the direct substitution W_s → Δx_ST.
  • standard math Paraxial free-space propagation and the Fresnel diffraction integral remain valid for the time-averaged intensity of the STWP.
    Implicit throughout the calculated I(x,z) profiles that are compared with experiment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Avoiding a line-of-sight obstacle via deep sub-Rayleigh shadow-projection utilizing space-time wave packets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BSZI2JIL

@misc{pith2026260702752,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Avoiding a line-of-sight obstacle via deep sub-Rayleigh shadow-projection utilizing space-time wave packets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BSZI2JIL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.02752}
}
abstract

A challenge in optics, which is shared by other sources of radiation, is to direct a coherent beam to impinge on a target behind an obstacle intervening in the line-of-sight (LoS). While self-accelerating or bending beams can help avoid an LoS obstacle, the beam does not reach the LoS target downstream beyond the obstacle. If one instead avoids the obstacle by projecting a \textit{transverse} null or shadow onto the axial plane at which it is located, an associated \textit{axial} shadow is cast that extends over the effective Rayleigh length, which reduces the utility of this approach. Unless either the wavelength or the transverse shadow width is changed, this Rayleigh length can only be reduced by modifying the structure of the illumination beam. Here we show that space-time wave packets (STWPs), in which each spatial frequency is tightly associated with a single wavelength, when used as an illumination beam, can dramatically reduce the axial extent of the cast shadow. Indeed, by utilizing STWPs we produce deep sub-Rayleigh-length shadows, in some cases with a more than two orders-of-magnitude reduction below the conventional Rayleigh length. For example, a 5-mm-wide transverse shadow in a Gaussian beam at a wavelength of $\sim1$~$\mu$m has a Rayleigh length of $\sim25$~m, whereas the same shadow projected by an STWP extends only $\sim0.15$~m. We demonstrate this sub-Rayleigh-length reduction in the axially cast shadow accompanying transverse nulls whose widths extend over a broad span of widths from 80~$\mu$m to 48~mm -- almost three orders-of-magnitude. These results may lead to advances in safe radiation therapy, non-LoS optical and wireless communications, selective stand-off detection, three-dimensional photolithography, and laser ablation and micro-machining.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02752 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) An optical beam following a curved trajectory — whether [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) A Gaussian beam of width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a-c) An extended cosine wave cos [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The spatiotemporal spectrum of a typical STWP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Setup for synthesizing STWPs. G: Diffraction grating; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Sub-Rayleigh shadow-projection utilizing STWPs after [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Sub-Rayleigh-length shadow-projection utilizing an STWP after 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) Photograph of the obstacle (a rubber duck of maximum width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Plot of the measured axial shadow length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    and curved plasma channels [25]. Recently, spatiotempo- rally structured pulsed beams in the form of space-time wave packets (STWPs) [26–30] (in which each spatial frequency is tightly associated with a prescribed wavelength) have been utilized to synthesize bending beams [31] (studied also in Refs. [32, 33]). However, such curved-trajectory beams do not ...

    arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    The transverse extent of the illumination fieldWmust exceed the transverse widthW s of the obstacle to be avoided (the width of the projected shadow),W>W s [Fig. 4(a,c)]

  3. [3]

    3(c) and Fig

    The beam spatial bandwidth∆k x must be large to in- corporate high spatial frequencies necessary for reduc- ing the axial length of the cast shadow; specifically, ∆kx > π Ws [Fig. 3(c) and Fig. 4(b,d)]. These two desiderata are incompatible when using a con- ventional coherent beam in which the beam widthWis related directly to its spatial bandwidth∆k x ∼...

    1920

  4. [4]

    and Airy [50] beams, in addition to STWPs [51]. In these experiments, an opaque obstruction is placed in the beam path, whereupon a null is produced in the immediate vicin- ity that rapidly recovers its original transverse profile. In our work here, we do not place an obstruction in the beam path. Rather, we introduce a null at the source and then project...

  5. [5]

    Extension to two transverse dimensions.We made use here of only one transverse dimensionx

    that relies on a new generation of rotated-chirped volume Bragg gratings [54, 55]. Extension to two transverse dimensions.We made use here of only one transverse dimensionx. Recent develop- ments in the synthesis of STWPs localized along all dimen- sions [29, 56, 57] now allow us to extend these results to both FIG. 11. Plot of the measured axial shadow l...

  6. [6]

    J. Hu, Z. Guo, J. Shi, X. Jiang, Q. Chen, H. Chen, Z. He, Q. Song, S. Xiao, S. Yu, N. Chi, and C. Shen, A metasurface- based full-color circular auto-focusing Airy beam transmitter for stable high-speed underwater wireless optical communica- tions, Nat. Commun.15, 2944 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Guerboukha, B

    H. Guerboukha, B. Zhao, Z. Fang, E. Knightly, and D. M. Mit- tleman, Curving thz wireless data links around obstacles, Com- mun. Eng.3, 58 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    H. Chen, A. Kludze, and Y . Ghasempour, A physics-informed Airy beam learning framework for blockage avoidance in sub- terahertz wireless networks, Nat. Commun.16, 7387 (2025)

    2025

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Dahlman, A

    A. Dahlman, A. G. Wile, R. G. Burns, G. R. Mason, F. M. John- son, and M. W. Berns, Laser photoradiation therapy of cancer, Cancer Res.43, 430 (1983)

    1983

  2. [10]

    J. J. Schuitmaker, P. Baas, H. L. L. M. van Leengoed, F. W. van der Meulen, W. M. Star, and N. van Zandwijk, Photodynamic therapy: a promising new modality for the treatment of cancer, J. Photochem. Photobiol., B.34, 3 (1996)

    1996

  3. [11]

    C. A. Robertson, D. H. Evans, and H. Abrahamse, Photody- namic therapy (PDT): A short review on cellular mechanisms and cancer research applications for PDT, J. Photochem. Pho- tobiol., B.96, 1 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Schena, P

    E. Schena, P. Saccomandi, and Y . Fong, Laser ablation for can- cer: Past, present and future, J. Funct. Biomater.8, 19 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Chung, P.-N

    T. Chung, P.-N. Nguyen, C. Y , S. Lee, and J. Yoon, Recent strategies to develop innovative photosensitizers for enhanced photodynamic therapy, Chemical Rev.121, 13454 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Y . Fan, L. Xu, S. Liu, J. Li, J. Xia, X. Qin, Y . Li, T. Gao, and X. Tang, The state-of-the-art and perspectives of laser ablation for tumor treatment, Cyborg Bionic Syst.5, 0062 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Nestoros, A

    E. Nestoros, A. Sharma, E. Kim, J. S. Kim, and M. Vendrell, Smart molecular designs and applications of activatable organic photosensitizers, Nat. Rev. Chemistry9, 40 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Jaiswal, C

    A. Jaiswal, C. K. Rastogi, S. Rani, G. P. Singh, S. Saxena, and S. Shukla, Two decades of two-photon lithography: Materials science perspective for additive manufacturing of 2D/3D nano- microstructures, iScience23, 106374 (2026)

    2026

  9. [17]

    Skliutas, G

    E. Skliutas, G. Merkininkait ˙e, S. Maruo, W. Zhang, W. Chen, W. Deng, J. Greer, G. von Freymann, and M. Malinauskas, Multiphoton 3D lithography, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers5, 15 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    A. P. Dhand, M. D. Davidson, and J. A. Burdick, Lithography- based 3D printing of hydrogels, Nat. Rev. Bioeng.3, 108 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Duocastella and C

    M. Duocastella and C. B. Arnold, Bessel and annular beams for materials processing, Laser Photon. Rev.6, 607–621 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    P. S. Salter and M. J. Booth, Adaptive optics in laser processing, Light Sci. Appl.8, 110 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    J. Bi, L. Wu, S. Li, Z. Yang, X. Jia, M. D. Starostenkov, and G. Dong, Beam shaping technology and its application in metal laser additive manufacturing: A review, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 26, 4606 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Schmidt, K

    M. Schmidt, K. Cvecek, J. Duflou, F. V ollertsen, C. B. Arnold, and M. J. Matthews, Dynamic beam shaping—improving laser materials processing via feature synchronous energy coupling, CIRP Annals73, 533 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    G. A. Siviloglou and D. N. Christodoulides, Accelerating finite energy Airy beams, Opt. Lett.32, 979 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    G. A. Siviloglou, J. Broky, A. Dogariu, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of accelerating Airy beams, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 213901 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    J. E. Morris, T. ˇCiˇzm´ar, H. I. C. Dalgarno, R. F. Marching- ton, F. J. Gunn-Moore, and K. Dholakia, Realization of curved Bessel beams: propagation around obstructions, J. Opt.12, 124002 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    I. D. Chremmos, Z. Chen, D. N. Christodoulides, and N. K. Efremidis, Bessel-like optical beams with arbitrary trajectories, Opt. Lett.37, 5003 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    J. Zhao, P. Zhang, D. Deng, J. Liu, Y . Gao, I. D. Chremmos, N. K. Efremidis, D. N. Christodoulides, and Z. Chen, Observa- tion of self-accelerating Bessel-like optical beams along arbi- trary trajectories, Opt. Lett.38, 498 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    N. K. Efremidis, Z. Chen, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, Airy beams and accelerating waves: an overview of recent ad- vances, Optica6, 686 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Clerici, Y

    M. Clerici, Y . Hu, P. Lassonde, C. Mili ´an, A. Couairon, D. N. Christodoulides, Z. Chen, L. Razzari, F. Vidal, F. L ´egar´e, D. Faccio, and R. Morandotti, Laser-assisted guiding of elec- tric discharges around objects, Sci. Adv.1, e1400111 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Polynkin, M

    P. Polynkin, M. Kolesik, J. V . Moloney, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Curved plasma channel generation using ultra-intense Airy beams, Science324, 229 (2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    H. E. Kondakci and A. F. Abouraddy, Diffraction-free pulsed optical beams via space-time correlations, Opt. Express24, 28659 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    K. J. Parker and M. A. Alonso, The longitudinal iso-phase con- dition and needle pulses, Opt. Express24, 28669 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    H. E. Kondakci and A. F. Abouraddy, Diffraction-free space- time light sheets, Nat. Photon.11, 733 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Yessenov, Z

    M. Yessenov, Z. Chen, J. Free, E. G. Johnson, M. P. J. Lavery, M. A. Alonso, and A. F. Abouraddy, Space-time wave packets localized in all dimensions, Nat. Commun.13, 4573 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Yessenov, L

    M. Yessenov, L. A. Hall, K. L. Schepler, and A. F. Abouraddy, Space-time wave packets, Adv. Opt. Photon.14, 455 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    L. A. Hall and A. F. Abouraddy, Bending space-time wave packets, Opt. Lett.50, 5829 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Liang, Y

    Z. Liang, Y . Liu, Y . Luo, H. Chen, and D. Deng, Space-time wave packets with arbitrary transverse and longitudinal accel- erations, Opt. Lett.48, 2543 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    C. Wang, Z. Liang, Z. Ruan, M. Ma, and D. Deng, Spatiotem- poral optical wave packets with arbitrary trajectories, Opt. Lett. 50, 4114 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich,Fundamentals of Photonics (Wiley, 2007). 13

    2007

  32. [40]

    H. E. Kondakci, M. A. Alonso, and A. F. Abouraddy, Classical entanglement underpins the propagation invariance of space- time wave packets, Opt. Lett.44, 2645 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Yessenov, B

    M. Yessenov, B. Bhaduri, L. Mach, D. Mardani, H. E. Kon- dakci, M. A. Alonso, G. A. Atia, and A. F. Abouraddy, What is the maximum differential group delay achievable by a space- time wave packet in free space?, Opt. Express27, 12443 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    H. E. Kondakci and A. F. Abouraddy, Optical space-time wave packets of arbitrary group velocity in free space, Nat. Commun. 10, 929 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Yessenov, B

    M. Yessenov, B. Bhaduri, H. E. Kondakci, M. Meem, R. Menon, and A. F. Abouraddy, Non-diffracting broadband in- coherent space-time fields, Optica6, 598 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    K. H. Kagalwala, G. Di Giuseppe, A. F. Abouraddy, and B. E. A. Saleh, Bell’s measure in classical optical coherence, Nat. Photon.7, 72 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    Sezginer, A general formulation of focus wave modes, J

    A. Sezginer, A general formulation of focus wave modes, J. Appl. Phys.57, 678 (1985)

    1985

  38. [46]

    L. A. Hall, M. A. Romer, B. L. Turo, T. M. Hayward, R. Menon, and A. F. Abouraddy, Space-time wave packets propagating a kilometer in air, arXiv:2209.03309 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    L. A. Hall, M. Yessenov, M. A. Romer, and A. F. Abouraddy, Long-distance axial spectral encoding using space-time wave packets, Opt. Lett.50, 4698 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    L. A. Hall and A. F. Abouraddy, Universal angular-dispersion synthesizer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A41, 83 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    M. A. Romer, L. A. Hall, and A. F. Abouraddy, Synthesis and characterization of space-time light sheets: a tutorial, J. Opt. 27, 013501 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    Bhaduri, M

    B. Bhaduri, M. Yessenov, and A. F. Abouraddy, Meters-long propagation of diffraction-free space-time light sheets, Opt. Ex- press26, 20111 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Bhaduri, M

    B. Bhaduri, M. Yessenov, D. Reyes, J. Pena, M. Meem, S. R. Fairchild, R. Menon, M. C. Richardson, and A. F. Abouraddy, Broadband space-time wave packets propagating for 70 m, Opt. Lett.44, 2073 (2019)

  44. [52]

    Bouchal, J

    Z. Bouchal, J. Wagner, and M. Chlup, Self-reconstruction of a distorted nondiffracting beam, Opt. Commun.151, 207 (1998)

    1998

  45. [53]

    Y . Shen, S. Pidishety, I. Nape, and A. Dudley, Self-healing of structured light: a review, J. Opt.24, 103001 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Chu, Analytical study on the self-healing property of Bessel beam, Eur

    X. Chu, Analytical study on the self-healing property of Bessel beam, Eur. Phys. J. D66, 259 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    Broky, G

    J. Broky, G. A. Siviloglou, A. Dogariu, and D. N. Christodoulides, Self-healing properties of optical Airy beams, Opt. Express16, 12880 (2008)

    2008

  48. [56]

    H. E. Kondakci and A. F. Abouraddy, Self-healing of space- time light sheets, Opt. Lett.43, 3830 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Yessenov and A

    M. Yessenov and A. F. Abouraddy, Changing the speed of opti- cal coherence in free space, Opt. Lett.44, 5125 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Mhibik, M

    O. Mhibik, M. Yessenov, L. Mach, L. Glebov, A. F. Abouraddy, and I. Divliansky, Ultra-compact synthesis of space-time wave packets, Opt. Lett.48, 2500 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Mhibik, M

    O. Mhibik, M. Yessenov, L. Glebov, A. F. Abouraddy, and I. Divliansky, Compact dual-band spectral analysis via multi- plexed rotated chirped volume bragg gratings, Opt. Lett.48, 5137 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Mhibik, M

    O. Mhibik, M. Yessenov, L. Glebov, A. F. Abouraddy, and I. Di- vliansky, Rotated chirped volume Bragg gratings for compact spectral analysis, Opt. Lett.48, 1180 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Yessenov, Z

    M. Yessenov, Z. Chen, M. P. J. Lavery, and A. F. Abouraddy, Vector space-time wave packets, Opt. Lett.47, 4131 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Yessenov, A

    M. Yessenov, A. H. Dorrah, C. Guo, L. A. Hall, J.-S. Park, J. Free, E. G. Johnson, F. Capasso, S. Fan, and A. F. Abouraddy, Ultrafast space-time optical merons in momentum- energy space, Nat. Commun.16, 8592 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.