Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 68 references

Orbital-Selective Mott and Antiferromagnetic Phases in Diagonally Compressed Kagome Lattice

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Diagonal compression of a kagome Hubbard lattice splits the three sublattices into orbital-selective metal and Mott regimes and, under strong compression, produces antiferromagnetic B–C chains.

desk verdict Solid DQMC survey of a new compression axis; orbital-selective Mott is real, the AFM boundary is only finite-size. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.04621 v1 pith:TF5CUUQ3 submitted 2026-07-06 cond-mat.str-el

Jiewei Ding , Ho-Kin Tang , Wing Chi Yu This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords kagomelatticeHubbardmodelorbital-selectiveMottdeterminantquantumMonteCarlogeometricfrustrationantiferromagnetismdiagonalcompressionlong-rangehopping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens to the half-filled Hubbard model when a kagome lattice is squeezed by reducing the angle between its primitive vectors while hoppings fall off exponentially with distance. Determinant quantum Monte Carlo shows that the three sublattices cease to be equivalent. For modest compression the A sites gain longer-range hoppings that leave them more metallic while B and C localize first; for stronger compression the shortened B–C bonds develop long-range antiferromagnetic correlations that in turn localize the A electrons. The result is an orbital-selective Mott regime and a two-parameter phase diagram containing paramagnetic metal, paramagnetic Mott, antiferromagnetic metal and antiferromagnetic Mott regions. The work supplies a concrete geometric knob that simultaneously tunes frustration, bandwidth and magnetic order, offering a controlled setting in which to study how lattice geometry and correlations compete in two-dimensional frustrated systems.

What carries the argument

The diagonally compressed kagome lattice with exponential hopping t(r) = t0 exp(−r/r0), simulated by determinant quantum Monte Carlo; the central observables are sublattice-resolved compressibility (used to extract effective charge gaps) and the longest-distance B–C spin correlation (used to locate the onset of antiferromagnetic order).

What would settle it

A systematic finite-size scaling study of the B–C spin structure factor and correlation ratio that either shows the antiferromagnetic signal vanishing in the thermodynamic limit or confirms a true long-range ordered phase below 52 degrees.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Geometric compression of the half-filled kagome Hubbard model with distance-dependent hopping produces clear sublattice differentiation: above roughly 52 degrees the A sublattice’s longer-range hoppings suppress metallicity on B/C and drive a selective Mott transition, while below 52 degrees long-range antiferromagnetic correlations on the B–C chains suppress metallicity on A, again producing an orbital-selective Mott phase and a rich U–θ diagram of paramagnetic and antiferromagnetic metal and Mott states.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that a statistically nonzero longest-distance B–C spin correlation on a 108-site lattice already marks the thermodynamic onset of long-range antiferromagnetism that can be drawn as a phase boundary.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The metal–Mott boundary of the whole lattice stays nearly flat with compression, while the sublattice-resolved critical interactions cross, so bulk transport can drop when only one sublattice localizes.
  • Strong compression converts the system into quasi-one-dimensional B–C antiferromagnetic chains that suppress multi-step A–B–C–A hopping and thereby lower the A-site Mott threshold.
  • The same geometric deformation simultaneously reduces triangular frustration and enhances bandwidth anisotropy, providing a single control parameter for both magnetic order and orbital-selective localization.
  • Cold-atom optical lattices or engineered moiré kagome platforms can realize the required hopping hierarchy without macroscopic elastic strain.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the finite-size AFM signal survives scaling, the phase diagram supplies a concrete route from a frustrated paramagnet to an orbital-selective antiferromagnet by continuous lattice deformation alone.
  • The sharp drop in U_c^A near the AFM onset suggests that magnetic order on one sublattice can act as an effective random field or Pauli blockade for the third sublattice, a mechanism that may generalize to other multi-orbital frustrated lattices.
  • Local compressibility imaging in cold-atom realizations could map the orbital-selective crossover directly, testing whether the global Mott boundary is set by the first or the last sublattice to localize.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports determinant quantum Monte Carlo (DQMC) simulations of the half-filled Hubbard model on a diagonally compressed kagome lattice with exponentially decaying long-range hopping t(r)=t0 exp(-r/r0). By varying the compression angle θ and interaction U, the authors measure double occupancy, charge compressibility (global and sublattice-resolved), and spin–spin correlations. They report that geometric compression breaks sublattice equivalence and produces orbital-selective Mott behavior: for θ≳52° the A sublattice remains more metallic while B/C become insulating first; for θ≲52° finite-size B–C antiferromagnetic correlations appear and are argued to suppress A-site metallicity, lowering U^c_A while raising U^c_{B/C}. An estimated U–θ phase diagram is constructed with paramagnetic-metal, paramagnetic-Mott, antiferromagnetic-metal, and antiferromagnetic-Mott regions.

Significance. If the reported sublattice differentiation and the associated selective Mott crossovers hold, the work supplies a concrete, geometry-driven route to orbital-selective Mott physics on a frustrated lattice that is distinct from the more commonly studied kagome–Lieb anisotropy. The systematic use of sublattice-resolved compressibility and double occupancy, together with an explicit half-filling chemical-potential determination for a non-particle-hole-symmetric hopping network, is a solid technical contribution. The finite-size spin diagnostics and the honest caveats about thermodynamic order are useful for guiding cold-atom or moiré realizations of tunable kagome hopping hierarchies. The central numerical survey is therefore of genuine interest to the frustrated-Hubbard and orbital-selective-Mott communities, provided the magnetic boundary and the causal AFM–selective-Mott link are stated at the level the data support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.B, Figs. 9–12] Sec. III.B and Fig. 12: The blue AFM boundary and the claim that long-range B–C AFM correlations drive the sharp drop in U^c_A for θ≲52° rest on G^x_BC(r_max) becoming statistically nonzero, an alternating-sign pattern, a sharpened S^x_BC(q=π) peak, and R_π, all obtained on a single size L=6 (N=108) at T=0.5. The text itself states that these quantities “cannot by themselves … determine a thermodynamic critical point” and that “systematic finite-size analysis … is left for future work.” Drawing a thermodynamic-looking AFM-metal / AFM-Mott boundary and using it as the causal organizer of the strong-compression half of the phase diagram therefore overstates the evidence. Either additional sizes (or at least a clear finite-size trend of G^x_BC(r_max) and R_π) should be supplied, or the boundary and the mechanism language should be demoted to “finite-size onset of long-range AFM correlations
  2. [Sec. III.A, Appendix A, Fig. 8] Sec. III.A and Appendix A: The metal–Mott boundary is located by the sign change of an effective gap Δ_c extracted from an activated fit κ(T)=k1 exp(-Δ_c/T) over T<1. On a finite lattice at the lowest temperature T=0.5 this procedure yields only a crossover scale, not a thermodynamic gap. The manuscript already notes that κ does not vanish at finite T; the phase diagram and abstract still present U^c (and the selective U^c_A, U^c_{B/C}) as sharp critical interactions. The claim would be more accurate if the boundaries were labeled as low-T crossover loci from the activated fit, with a brief discussion of how the extracted U^c would shift under lower T or larger L.
  3. [Abstract, Sec. III.C, Fig. 12(b)] Abstract and Sec. III.C: The abstract asserts that for θ≲52° the B–C chains “develop long-range antiferromagnetic correlations … which in turn suppresses the metallic behavior of the A sublattice.” The temporal/causal “in turn” is not demonstrated; the coincidence of the drop in U^c_A with the finite-size AFM onset is shown, but no controlled comparison (e.g., a calculation that freezes or removes the staggered BC background while keeping the hopping network) is provided. Softening the causal wording to “coincides with” or “is consistent with suppression by” would align the claim with the data actually presented.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II, Fig. 2] Fig. 2 and surrounding text: The average sign is shown only at T=0.5. A brief statement of ⟨s⟩ at the higher temperatures used in the κ(T) fits would reassure readers that the activated-fit data are not sign-limited.
  2. [Sec. II] Eq. (1) and Fig. 1: The choice t0=100, r0=0.11 is fixed so that t(0.5)≈1 and t(1.0)≈0.011. A short sensitivity check (or a sentence that results are qualitatively stable under modest changes of r0) would strengthen the claim that the physics is geometric rather than parameter-specific.
  3. [Sec. III, Fig. 5] Fig. 5: The sublattice densities n_A and n_{B/C} deviate from 1 at small U; it would help to state explicitly that all subsequent κ_α and D_α are evaluated at the same global μ_h that enforces total n=1, so that the selective Mott analysis is not contaminated by a global density shift.
  4. [Throughout] Typographical / notation: “Observables” is misspelled as “OBSERV ABLES” in the section heading; “moir’e” appears with an inconsistent apostrophe in the conclusion; the arXiv header date “July 7, 2026” is presumably a placeholder and should be corrected.
  5. [Sec. III.A] References: The discussion of orbital-selective Mott physics cites the standard multi-orbital literature; a brief pointer to recent site-selective Mott work in nickelates (already partially cited) could be expanded by one sentence to clarify the analogy drawn in Sec. III.A.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: DQMC measurements of a defined Hamiltonian produce the phase diagram; modeling choices (exponential hopping, activated Δc fit) are inputs, not redefinitions of the claimed selective-Mott or AFM results.

full rationale

The paper defines a half-filled Hubbard model on a diagonally compressed kagome lattice with an explicit distance-dependent hopping t(r)=t0 exp(-r/r0), then measures double occupancy, compressibility, and spin correlations via DQMC. Sublattice-resolved Uc values are operationally extracted from the sign change of an effective charge activation scale fitted to low-T κ(T); the AFM boundary is assigned from finite-size indicators (nonzero Gx_BC(rmax), alternating sign, sharpened Sx_BC(q=π)). These are modeling and analysis choices, not circular reductions: the observables are not fitted to force the phases, no uniqueness theorem or self-citation is load-bearing for the central claims, and the authors themselves flag the AFM boundary as finite-size only. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained numerical survey work; the reader’s score of ~1 is appropriate. Minor residual is only the usual interpretive step of drawing a phase boundary from finite-size data, which is not circularity under the stated criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a standard half-filled Hubbard Hamiltonian plus three modeling choices (exponential hopping form with fixed t0,r0; finite L=6 lattice; activated fit for charge gap) and the usual DQMC approximations. No new particles or forces are invented; the 'diagonally compressed kagome' is simply a geometric deformation of a known lattice.

free parameters (4)
  • t0, r0 in t(r)=t0 exp(-r/r0) = t0=100, r0=0.11
    Chosen so that t(0.5)≈1 and t(1.0)≈0.011; the two numbers fix the entire hopping hierarchy and therefore the strength of sublattice differentiation.
  • linear system size L = L=6
    Fixed at L=6 (N=108) for all production runs; the AFM boundary is read from correlations on this single size.
  • imaginary-time step δτ = 0.1
    Trotter error control; set to 0.1 throughout.
  • lowest temperature T=0.5 = T=0.5
    All phase-boundary estimates are extrapolated or read at this finite T; lower T is limited by cost rather than sign problem.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The half-filled repulsive Hubbard model with the given long-range hopping captures the essential physics of a compressed kagome lattice.
    Standard starting point for the field; invoked from the Hamiltonian definition in Sec. II onward.
  • domain assumption DQMC with HS decoupling and Trotter decomposition at δτ=0.1 yields controlled finite-temperature observables once the average sign is monitored.
    Standard numerical method; sign is shown to remain manageable (Fig. 2).
  • ad hoc to paper An activated fit κ(T)=k1 exp(-Δc/T) whose Δc changes sign locates the metal-Mott boundary.
    Operational definition used in Sec. III.A and Appendix A; not a rigorous gap extraction.
  • ad hoc to paper Statistically nonzero Gx_BC(r_max) plus alternating signs and sharpened R_π on L=6 indicate the onset of long-range AFM correlations.
    Finite-size proxy adopted in Sec. III.B; authors note that true long-range order requires future scaling.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Orbital-Selective Mott and Antiferromagnetic Phases in Diagonally Compressed Kagome Lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TF5CUUQ3

@misc{pith2026260704621,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Orbital-Selective Mott and Antiferromagnetic Phases in Diagonally Compressed Kagome Lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TF5CUUQ3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.04621}
}
abstract

We perform determinant quantum Monte Carlo simulations of the half-filled Hubbard model on a diagonally compressed kagome lattice, introducing exponential decay long-range hopping $t(r) = t_0 \exp\bigl(-r / r_0\bigr)$ to account for the evolving bond length. By varying the lattice angle $\theta$ and the on-site interaction $U$, double occupancy, charge compressibility, and spin-spin correlation functions of the whole system and each sub-lattice are measured. We find that geometric compression induces a clear sublattice differentiation: for $\theta\gtrsim52^\circ$, the A sublattice establishes long-range hoppings, which in turn suppresses the metallic behavior of the $B/C$ sublattice and drives a selective Mott transition; for $\theta\lesssim52^\circ$, the $B$-$C$ chains develop long-range antiferromagnetic correlations within the finite-size simulations, which in turn suppresses the metallic behavior of the $A$ sublattice and drives a selective Mott transition. The critical interaction $U^c_A$ for the $A$ sites decreases sharply near the onset of $B$-$C$ antiferromagnetic correlations, while $U^c_{B/C}$ increases. These competing orders give rise to an orbital-selective Mott phase and a rich $U$-$\theta$ phase diagram featuring paramagnetic-metal, paramagnetic-Mott, antiferromagnetic-metal, and antiferromagnetic-Mott states. Our results highlight the complex interplay between lattice geometry, magnetic frustration, and strong correlations in frustrated two-dimensional systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04621 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the kagome lattice before and af [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature dependence of the global chemical po [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Temperature dependence of the average particle num [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Temperature dependence of the double occupancy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a–c) Transverse spin correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a–c) Logarithm of the absolute value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: shows representative fits for the lattice￾averaged compressibility at θ = 60◦ , 54◦ , and 46◦ . The dashed black lines are linear fits performed in the low￾temperature regime T < 1, using the same fitting pro￾cedure as that used to obtain the effective charge gaps sho…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Panels (a) and (b) show the spin correlation func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature, 464, 199–208 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature, 464, 199–208 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum spin liquid states, Rev. Mod. Phys.,89, 025003 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    J. S. Heltonet al., Spin dynamics of the spin-1/2 kagome lattice antiferromagnet ZnCu 3(OH)6Cl2, Phys. Rev. Lett.,98, 107204 (2007)

    2007

  4. [4]

    T.-H. Han, J. S. Helton, S. Chu, D. G. Nocera, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, C. Broholm, and Y. S. Lee, Frac- tionalized excitations in the spin-liquid state of a kagome- lattice antiferromagnet, Nature492, 406–410 (2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    Shimizu, K

    Y. Shimizu, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda, M. Maesato, and G. Saito, Spin liquid state in an organic Mott insulator with a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 107001 (2003)

    2003

  6. [6]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature527, 212–215 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    Ikhlas, T

    M. Ikhlas, T. Tomita, T. Koretsune, M.-T. Suzuki, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, Y. Otani, and S. Nakat- suji, Large anomalous Nernst effect at room temperature in a chiral antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys.,13, 1085-1090 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    L. Ye, M. Kang, J. Liu, F. von Cube, C. R. Wicker, T. Suzuki, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, D. C. Bell, L. Fu, R. Comin, and J. G. Checkelsky , Massive Dirac fermions in a ferromagnetic kagome metal, Nature555, 638–642 (2018)

    2018

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    B. R. Ortiz, L. C. Gomes, J. R. Morey, M. Winiarski, M. Bordelon, J. S. Mangum, I. W. H. Oswald, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, J. R. Neilson, S. D. Wil- son, E. Ertekin, T. M. McQueen, and E. S. Toberer, New kagome prototype materials: discovery of KV 3Sb5, RbV3Sb5, and CsV 3Sb5, Ph...

    2019

  2. [10]

    Neupert, M

    T. Neupert, M. M. Denner, J.-X. Yin, R. Thomale, and M. Z. Hasan, Charge order and superconductivity in kagome materials, Nat. Phys.18, 137 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Zhang, T

    W. Zhang, T. F. Poon, C. W. Tsang, W. Wang, X. Liu, J. Xie, S. T. Lam, S. Wang, K. T. Lai, A. Pourret, G. Sey- farth, G. Knebel, W. C. Yu, and S. K. Goh, Large Fermi surface in pristine kagome metal CsV 3Sb5 and enhanced quasiparticle effective masses, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U...

    2024

  4. [12]

    Z. Wang, L. Wang, K. Y. Yip, Y. K. Tsui, T. F. Poon, W. Wang, C. W. Tsang, S. Wang, D. Graf, A. Pourret, G. Seyfarth, G. Knebel, K. T. Lai, W. C. Yu, W. Zhang, and S. K. Goh, Discovery of a new phase in thin flakes of KV3Sb5 under pressure, Adv. Sci. (Weinh.)12, e2415012 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Liu, Z.-Y

    Y. Liu, Z.-Y. Liu, J.-K. Bao, P.-T. Yang, L.-W. Ji, S.- Q. Wu, Q.-X. Shen, J. Luo, J. Yang, J.-Y. Liu, C.-C. Xu, W.-Z. Yang, W.-L. Chai, J.-Y. Lu, C.-C. Liu, B.-S. Wang, H. Jiang, Q. Tao, Z. Ren, X.-F. Xu, C. Cao, Z.-A. Xu, R. Zhou, J.-G. Cheng, and G.-H. Cao, Superconduc- tiv...

    2024

  6. [14]

    C. Xu, S. Wu, G.-X. Zhi, G. Cao, J. Dai, C. Cao, X. Wang, and H.-Q. Lin, Altermagnetic ground state in distorted kagome metal CsCr 3Sb5 , Nat. Commun.16, 3114 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Imada, A

    M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.,70, 1039 (1998)

    1998

  8. [16]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott in- 13 sulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.,78, 17–85 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Orenstein and A

    J. Orenstein and A. J. Millis, Advances in the physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Science288, 468–474 (2000)

    2000

  10. [18]

    E. Gull, O. Parcollet, and A. J. Millis, Superconductiv- ity and the pseudogap in the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 216405 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature518, 179–186 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    C. Zou, J. Choi, Q. Li, S. Ye, C. Yin, M. Garcia- Fernandez, S. Agrestini, and et al., Evolution from a charge-ordered insulator to a high-temperature supercon- ductor in Bi 2Sr2(Ca, Dy)Cu2O8+δ, Nat. Commun.15, 7739 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    X. H. Chen, T. Wu, G. Wu, R. H. Liu, H. Chen, and D. F. Fang, Superconductivity at 43 K in SmFeAsO1−xFx, Na- ture453, 761–762 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Bernardini, G

    F. Bernardini, G. Garbarino, A. Sulpice, M. N´ u˜ nez- Regueiro, E. Gaudin, B. Chevalier, M.-A. Measson, A. Cano, and S. Tenc´ e, Iron-based superconductivity ex- tended to the novel silicide LaFeSiH, Phys. Rev. B97, 100504 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Ohashi, T

    T. Ohashi, T. Momoi, H. Tsunetsugu, and N. Kawakami , Finite temperature Mott transition in Hubbard model on anisotropic triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 076402 (2008)

    2008

  16. [24]

    Yamada, K

    A. Yamada, K. Seki, R. Eder, and Y. Ohta , Mott transition and ferrimagnetism in the Hubbard model on the anisotropic kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B83, 195127 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Higa and K

    R. Higa and K. Asano, Bond formation effects on the metal-insulator transition in the half-filled kagome Hub- bard model, Phys. Rev. B93, 245123 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Ohashi, N

    T. Ohashi, N. Kawakami, and H. Tsunetsugu, Mott tran- sition in kagome lattice Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 066401 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    Kuratani, A

    S. Kuratani, A. Koga, and N. Kawakami, Mott transition of correlated electrons on the kagome lattice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter19, 145252 (2007)

    2007

  20. [28]

    Guertler, Kagome lattice Hubbard model at half filling, Phys

    S. Guertler, Kagome lattice Hubbard model at half filling, Phys. Rev. B90, 081105 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Sun and Z

    R.-Y. Sun and Z. Zhu, Metal-insulator transition and in- termediate phases in the kagome lattice Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B104, L121118 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    A. R. Medeiros–Silva, N. C. Costa, and T. Paiva , Ther- modynamic, magnetic, and transport properties of the repulsive Hubbard model on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B107, 035134 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Kaufmann, K

    J. Kaufmann, K. Steiner, R. T. Scalettar, K. Held, and O. Janson , How correlations change the magnetic struc- ture factor of the kagome Hubbard model Phys. Rev. B 104, 165127 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Bulut, W

    N. Bulut, W. Koshibae, and S. Maekawa, Magnetic corre- lations in the Hubbard model on triangular and kagom´ e lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 037001 (2005)

    2005

  25. [33]

    W. P. Lima, D. R. da Costa, S. H. R. Sena, and J. Milton Pereira, Jr. , Effects of uniaxial and shear strains on the electronic spectrum of Lieb and kagome lattices , Phys. Rev. B108, 125433 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Lim, J.-N

    L.-K. Lim, J.-N. Fuchs, F. Pi´ echon, and G. Montambaux, Dirac points emerging from flat bands in Lieb-kagome lattices, Phys. Rev. B,101, 045131 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Jiang, M

    W. Jiang, M. Kang, H. Huang, H. Xu, T. Low, and F. Liu, Topological band evolution between Lieb and kagome lattices, Phys. Rev. B99, 125131 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Jiang, M

    W. Jiang, M. Kang, H. Huang, H. Xu, T. Low, and F. Liu , Erratum: Topological band evolution be- tween Lieb and kagome lattices [Phys. Rev. B 99, 125131 (2019)], Phys. Rev. B105, 159901 (2022)

    2019

  29. [37]

    L. O. Lima, A. R. Medeiros–Silva, R. R. dos Santos, T. Paiva, and N. C. Costa , Magnetism and metal- insulator transitions in the anisotropic kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B108, 235163 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    G.-B. Jo, J. Guzman, C. K. Thomas, P. Hosur, A. Vish- wanath, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Ultracold atoms in a tunable optical kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 045305 (2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    Chern, C.-C

    G.-W. Chern, C.-C. Chien, and M. Di Ventra, Dynam- ically generated flat-band phases in optical kagome lat- tices, Phys. Rev. A,90, 013609 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Leung, M

    T.-H. Leung, M. N. Schwarz, S.-W. Chang, C. D. Brown, G. Unnikrishnan, and D. Stamper–Kurn , Interaction- enhanced group velocity of bosons in the flat band of an optical kagome lattice Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 133001 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Blankenbecler, D

    R. Blankenbecler, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Monte Carlo calculations of coupled boson-fermion sys- tems. I, Phys. Rev. D24, 2278 (1981)

    1981

  34. [42]

    R. R. Santos, Introduction to quantum Monte Carlo sim- ulations for fermionic systems, Braz. J. Phys.33, 36–54 (2003)

    2003

  35. [43]

    Z. Bai, W. Chen, R. Scalettar, and I. Yamazaki, Lecture notes on advances of numerical methods for quantum Monte Carlo simulations of the Hubbard model, Lecture notes, (2007)

    2007

  36. [44]

    M. Qin, H. Shi, and S. Zhang, Benchmark study of the two-dimensional Hubbard model with auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo method, Phys. Rev. B94, 085103 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    V. I. Iglovikov, E. Khatami, and R. T. Scalettar, Geom- etry dependence of the sign problem in quantum Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. B92, 045110 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Pan and Z

    G. Pan and Z. Y. Meng, Sign problem in quantum Monte Carlo simulation, arXiv:2204.08777 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Wick, The evaluation of the collision matrix, Phys

    G.-C. Wick, The evaluation of the collision matrix, Phys. Rev.80, 268 (1950)

    1950

  40. [48]

    C. Wen, X. Zhu, Z. Xiao, N. Hao, R. Mondaini, H. Guo, and S. Feng, Superconducting pairing symme- try in the kagome-lattice Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 105, 075118 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Xiao, Y.-Y

    B. Xiao, Y.-Y. He, A. Georges, and S. Zhang, Tem- perature dependence of spin and charge orders in the doped two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011007 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    C. N. Varney, C.-R. Lee, Z. J. Bai, S. Chiesa, M. Jarrell, and R. T. Scalettar, Quantum Monte Carlo study of the two-dimensional fermion Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 80, 075116 (2009)

    2009

  43. [51]

    A. W. Sandvik, Computational studies of quantum spin systems, AIP Conf. Proc.1297, 135–338 (2010)

    2010

  44. [52]

    W. S. Oliveira, T. Paiva, R. T. Scalettar, and N. C. Costa, Magnetic and singlet phases in the three- dimensional periodic Anderson model, Phys. Rev. B108, 115121 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    V. I. Anisimov, I. A. Nekrasov, D. E. Kondakov, T. M. 14 Rice, and M. Sigrist, Orbital-selective Mott-insulator transition in Ca 2−xSrxRuO4, Eur. Phys. J. B25, 191 (2002)

    2002

  46. [54]

    A. Koga, N. Kawakami, T. M. Rice, and M. Sigrist, Orbital-selective Mott transitions in the degenerate Hub- bard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 216402 (2004)

    2004

  47. [55]

    Liebsch, Single Mott transition in the multiorbital Hubbard model, Phys

    A. Liebsch, Single Mott transition in the multiorbital Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B70, 165103 (2004)

    2004

  48. [56]

    de’ Medici, A

    L. de’ Medici, A. Georges, and S. Biermann, Orbital- selective Mott transition in multiband systems: Slave- spin representation and dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B72, 205124 (2005)

    2005

  49. [57]

    Yu and Q

    R. Yu and Q. Si, Orbital-selective Mott phase in multi- orbital models for alkaline iron selenides K 1−xFe2−ySe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 146402 (2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    Herbrych, N

    J. Herbrych, N. Kaushal, A. Nocera, G. Alvarez, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Spin dynamics of the block orbital-selective Mott phase, Nat. Commun.9, 3736 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    S. Kim, S. Backes, H. Yoon, W. Kim, C. Sohn, J. Son, S. Biermann, T. W. Noh, and S. Y. Park, Orbital- selective Mott and Peierls transition in H xVO2, npj Quantum Mater.7, 95 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    M. Kim, S. Choi, W. H. Brito, and G. Kotliar, Orbital- Selective Mott Transition Effects and Nontrivial Topol- ogy of iron chalcogenide, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 136504 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    H. Park, A. J. Millis, and C. A. Marianetti, Site-selective Mott transition in rare-earth-element nickelates, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 156402 (2012)

    2012

  54. [62]

    Layek, E

    S. Layek, E. Greenberg, D. Levy, V. Prakapenka, S. S. Saxena, and G. Kh. Rozenberg, Correlated electron physics near a site-selective pressure-induced Mott tran- sition inα-LiFe 5O8, Commun. Mater.5, 155 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    P. M. Duarte, R. A. Hart, T.-L. Yang, X. Liu, T. Paiva, E. Khatami, R. T. Scalettar, N. Trivedi, and R. G. Hulet, Compressibility of a fermionic Mott insulator of ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 070403 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, A. M. Kosevich, and L. P. Pitaevskii,Theory of Elasticity, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 7, 3rd ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford, (1986)

    1986

  57. [65]

    M. F. Ashby and D. R. H. Jones,Engineering Materi- als 1: An Introduction to Properties, Applications and Design, 4th ed. Elsevier, (2012)

    2012

  58. [66]

    W. M. Haynes,CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, (2016)

    2016

  59. [67]

    ASM Handbook Committeeet al.,Properties and Selec- tion: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials, ASM International, (1990)

    1990

  60. [68]

    Motruk, D

    J. Motruk, D. Rossi, D. A. Abanin, and L. Rademaker, Kagome chiral spin liquid in transition metal dichalco- genide moir´ e bilayers, Phys. Rev. Research5, L022049 (2023). 15 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 1/T 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 ln[ ] (a) =60 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 1/T 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 ln[ ] (b...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.