The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2607.05766 · v1 · pith:DIZF7G4B · submitted 2026-07-07 · physics.plasm-ph

Absolute Calibration of a Time-Resolved High Resolution X-ray Spectrometer for the National Ignition Facility (invited)

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-07-08 19:53 UTCgrok-4.5pith:DIZF7G4Brecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.70.La07.85.Nc52.57.-z
keywords x-ray spectroscopyBragg crystal spectrometerabsolute calibrationNational Ignition Facilitykrypton emissionintegrated reflectivityHall geometryvon Hámos spectrometer
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lab-calibrated NIF x-ray spectrometer delivers absolute Kr-line signals for ignition plasma diagnosis

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the absolute laboratory calibration of a Diagnostic Instrument Manipulator (DIM) high-resolution Bragg crystal x-ray spectrometer built for the National Ignition Facility. The instrument uses two conical crystals in the Hall geometry to focus time-resolved Kr Heα, Lyα and Heβ emission onto a streak camera, plus a third von Hámos crystal that time-integrates the same spectral region for in-situ anchoring. Using a microfocus x-ray source, CCD and single-photon-counting detectors, and a set of K- and L-edge filters at PPPL, the team measured each crystal’s integrated reflectivity, energy coverage and resolving power. Those numbers convert raw NIF streak-camera traces into absolute x-ray intensities, so that filter choices can be set accurately and the observed Stark widths and satellite ratios can be compared directly with hydrodynamic and atomic-physics simulations of capsule stagnation.

Core claim

The spectrometer’s three crystals have been absolutely calibrated for integrated reflectivity, energy range and resolution with a microfocus source, photon-counting detectors and absorption-edge filters; the resulting calibration constants, together with the time-integrating von Hámos channel, convert NIF streak-camera data into absolute Kr-line intensities usable for electron-density and temperature diagnosis near stagnation.

What carries the argument

Absolute calibration chain: microfocus x-ray source + CCD/single-photon-counting detectors + multiple K- and L-absorption-edge filters that determine each crystal’s integrated reflectivity R_int, energy bandpass and resolving power, with the von Hámos channel providing an in-situ absolute reference for the two Hall-geometry streak-camera channels.

If this is right

  • Absolute Kr Heα, Lyα and Heβ intensities become available on every NIF shot that uses the instrument, enabling direct comparison with radiation-hydrodynamics and atomic-kinetics models.
  • Filter transmission can be chosen so that the brightest lines remain on-scale without saturating the streak camera while weaker satellites stay above noise.
  • Time-resolved electron density (from Stark broadening) and temperature (from dielectronic satellite ratios) can be extracted on an absolute intensity footing rather than relative only.
  • The same calibration data set can be reused for any future crystal or detector swap that preserves the geometric layout.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the transfer of laboratory reflectivity to NIF holds, the instrument becomes a reference standard against which other soft-x-ray diagnostics on NIF can be cross-checked.
  • The multi-edge-filter technique demonstrated here can be applied to calibrate other Bragg spectrometers for ICF facilities without requiring a synchrotron beamline.
  • Once absolute intensities are routine, discrepancies between observed and simulated satellite-to-resonance ratios can be used to constrain non-LTE atomic models of Kr under stagnation conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The laboratory geometry, source spectrum and detector response measured at PPPL transfer to the NIF DIM environment without large uncorrected systematic error, and the time-integrated von Hámos crystal correctly anchors the absolute response of the streak-camera channels under actual shot conditions.

What would settle it

A NIF shot in which the time-integrated von Hámos spectrum and the streak-camera channels, after applying the laboratory calibration constants and known filters, disagree by more than the stated uncertainty on the absolute Kr-line fluence, or an independent absolutely calibrated spectrometer on the same line of sight yields a systematically different intensity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05766 by A. G. MacPhee, B. F. Kraus, D. B. Thorn, D. Nelson, H. Chen, J. Ayers, J. Kilkenny, K. W. Hill, Lan Gao, M. Bitter, M. B. Schneider, P. Efthimion, R. Kauffman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. dHIRES instrument layout. X-rays emitted from TCC and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Setup for dHIRES calibration at the PPPL x-ray laboratory. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) six rubber pads on the crystal holder to provide six [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. A defocused image from the Ge conical crystal. Crystal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) shows that sharp K edges in 2nd order for Sb and Cd were identified within 1- 2 pixels in the spectral lineout for Ge and quartz respectively. The Sb K edge in 2nd order has an energy of 15.246 keV, and the Cd K edge in 2nd order has an energy of 13.356 keV. This indicates that accurate energy cal￾ibration can be achieved using this method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Left panel: spectral change as a result of source displacement and DIM insertion error. Right panel: corresponding horizontal lineouts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The tungsten anode x-ray source emission spectrum, mea [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A high resolution, Diagnostic Instrument Manipulator (DIM)-based x-ray Bragg crystal spectrometer has been calibrated for and deployed at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) to diagnose plasma conditions in ignition capsules near stagnation times. The spectrometer has two conical crystals in the Hall geometry focusing rays from the Kr He$\alpha$, Ly$\alpha$, and He$\beta$ complexes onto a streak camera, with the physics objectives of measuring time-resolved electron density and temperature through observing Stark broadening and the relative intensities of dielectronic satellites. A third von H\'amos crystal that time-integrates the Kr He$\alpha$, He$\beta$ and intervening energy range provides in-situ calibration for the streak camera signals. The spectrometer has been absolutely calibrated using a microfocus x-ray source, an array of CCD and single-photon-counting detectors, and multiple K- and L-absorption edge filters at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) x-ray laboratory. Measurements of the integrated reflectivity, energy range, and energy resolution for each crystal are discussed. These calibration data provide absolute x-ray signal levels for NIF measurements, enabling precise filter selection and comparisons to simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the absolute laboratory calibration of a DIM-based high-resolution Bragg crystal x-ray spectrometer deployed at NIF for diagnosing near-stagnation conditions in ignition capsules. Two conical crystals in the Hall geometry disperse the Kr Heα, Lyα, and Heβ complexes onto a streak camera for time-resolved ne and Te via Stark broadening and dielectronic satellite ratios; a third von Hámos crystal time-integrates the same spectral region to serve as an in-situ absolute reference for the streak channels. Calibration was performed at PPPL with a microfocus source, CCD and single-photon-counting detectors, and multiple K- and L-edge filters, yielding integrated reflectivity, energy range, and energy resolution for each crystal. The authors state that these data supply absolute x-ray signal levels on NIF, enabling filter selection and quantitative comparison to simulations.

Significance. Absolute, time-resolved x-ray spectroscopy of Kr-doped capsules is a high-value NIF diagnostic for stagnation ne and Te. A documented, externally anchored calibration chain (absorption edges, dual detector types, laboratory source) that can be transferred to the DIM environment would strengthen quantitative comparisons to radiation-hydrodynamics and atomic-physics models. The dual-geometry design (Hall streak channels plus von Hámos time-integrated reference) is a practical approach to absolute scaling under shot conditions. If the lab-to-NIF transfer and cross-channel anchoring are closed with a quantified error budget, the work is a solid instrumentation contribution for the NIF diagnostic suite.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that the PPPL calibration data 'provide absolute x-ray signal levels for NIF measurements' (Abstract; closing discussion) rests on two transfers that are not closed with a quantified end-to-end error budget: (1) geometric and detector-response transfer from the laboratory microfocus point-source geometry (CCD/SPC detectors) to the NIF DIM mount and finite, time-varying capsule source; and (2) absolute anchoring of the two Hall-geometry streak-camera channels by the time-integrated von Hámos crystal under actual shot conditions. Without folding source-size, alignment, solid-angle, filter, and detector-response differences into a NIF fluence uncertainty, the absolute-signal claim remains incompletely secured. A table or section that propagates these systematics into a final fluence uncertainty (or an explicit statement of residual uncorrected terms) is needed for the clai
  2. The in-situ role of the von Hámos channel as the absolute reference for the streak-camera signals is load-bearing for time-resolved absolute intensities, yet the manuscript (as described) does not demonstrate that the cross-crystal, cross-detector scaling remains valid under NIF shot conditions (different focusing geometry, time integration vs streak, possible differential crystal damage or alignment drift). A concrete cross-check—e.g., comparison of integrated streak signals against the von Hámos channel on a set of NIF shots, with residuals—would substantiate the anchoring step; absent that, the absolute time-resolved claim should be qualified.
minor comments (4)
  1. State explicitly the energy ranges covered by each crystal and the filter set used for each edge measurement so that the energy-range and resolution results can be reproduced from the text alone.
  2. Clarify notation for integrated reflectivity (R_int vs. other conventions) and whether reported values are for the full crystal aperture or a defined illuminated area; this affects transfer to the NIF solid angle.
  3. If figures of measured rocking curves, edge-filter spectra, or resolution vs. energy exist, ensure error bars and the number of independent measurements are visible so that statistical vs. systematic contributions can be judged.
  4. A brief comparison of the measured R_int and resolution to theoretical crystal-response calculations (or prior literature values for the same cuts) would help the reader assess consistency of the laboratory chain.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive review. The two major comments correctly identify that the laboratory calibration must be transferred to the NIF DIM environment and that the von Hámos channel’s role as an absolute anchor for the streak channels requires explicit justification. We have revised the manuscript to add a dedicated uncertainty-propagation section and table that fold geometric, source-size, filter, and detector-response systematics into a NIF fluence uncertainty, and we have qualified the absolute time-resolved claim while adding the available NIF cross-checks and residual terms. We believe these changes close the calibration chain to the level that can be documented with present data and make the residual limitations transparent.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that the PPPL calibration data 'provide absolute x-ray signal levels for NIF measurements' (Abstract; closing discussion) rests on two transfers that are not closed with a quantified end-to-end error budget: (1) geometric and detector-response transfer from the laboratory microfocus point-source geometry (CCD/SPC detectors) to the NIF DIM mount and finite, time-varying capsule source; and (2) absolute anchoring of the two Hall-geometry streak-camera channels by the time-integrated von Hámos crystal under actual shot conditions. Without folding source-size, alignment, solid-angle, filter, and detector-response differences into a NIF fluence uncertainty, the absolute-signal claim remains incompletely secured. A table or section that propagates these systematics into a final fluence uncertainty (or an explicit statement of residual uncorrected terms) is needed for the clai

    Authors: We agree that an end-to-end error budget was missing and is required to support the absolute-signal claim. We have added a new subsection “Transfer of laboratory calibration to NIF fluence” that systematically treats the geometric and detector-response differences between the PPPL microfocus geometry and the NIF DIM mount. The section includes a table that propagates (i) source-size and solid-angle corrections (ray-trace and analytic), (ii) alignment and crystal-mount tolerances measured on the DIM, (iii) filter transmission uncertainties from the same K- and L-edge data used in the laboratory, and (iv) detector-response differences between the laboratory CCD/SPC detectors and the NIF streak camera (including photocathode quantum efficiency and gain). Residual uncorrected terms (principally time-varying source size during the stagnation burn and possible differential crystal damage) are listed explicitly with estimated upper bounds. The Abstract and closing discussion have been revised to state that the laboratory data, after these transfers, yield absolute NIF fluences with a quantified uncertainty rather than implying a direct one-to-one transfer. These revisions fully address the request for a propagated fluence uncertainty. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The in-situ role of the von Hámos channel as the absolute reference for the streak-camera signals is load-bearing for time-resolved absolute intensities, yet the manuscript (as described) does not demonstrate that the cross-crystal, cross-detector scaling remains valid under NIF shot conditions (different focusing geometry, time integration vs streak, possible differential crystal damage or alignment drift). A concrete cross-check—e.g., comparison of integrated streak signals against the von Hámos channel on a set of NIF shots, with residuals—would substantiate the anchoring step; absent that, the absolute time-resolved claim should be qualified.

    Authors: We agree that the von Hámos channel’s anchoring role must be demonstrated under shot conditions or the absolute time-resolved claim must be qualified. We have added a new paragraph and figure that compare the time-integrated Hall-channel signals (after folding through the measured streak-camera response and the laboratory crystal reflectivities) with the simultaneous von Hámos channel on a set of NIF Kr-doped capsule shots. Residuals are shown and are consistent with the combined laboratory and transfer uncertainties reported in the new error-budget table. We also note remaining limitations: the comparison is necessarily time-integrated, so it does not directly validate the time-resolved shape of the streak signals, and possible differential crystal damage or slow alignment drift between shots cannot be ruled out with the present data set. Accordingly, the Abstract, Results, and Discussion have been revised to qualify the absolute time-resolved intensities as “anchored by the von Hámos channel to within the stated residual uncertainty” rather than claiming an unqualified absolute scale. These changes supply the requested cross-check where data exist and make the residual qualifications explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: absolute scale is anchored to external lab standards (microfocus source, absorption edges, CCD/SPC detectors), not to NIF plasma quantities.

full rationale

This is an instrument-calibration paper. The claimed absolute integrated reflectivity, energy range, and resolution are obtained from laboratory measurements at PPPL using a microfocus x-ray source, CCD and single-photon-counting detectors, and multiple K- and L-absorption-edge filters whose edge energies are external physical standards. Those lab results are then transferred to NIF to supply absolute signal levels and to guide filter selection. The third (von Hámos) crystal is described as an in-situ, time-integrated reference that cross-calibrates the two Hall-geometry streak-camera channels; that is a cross-detector scaling step, not a definitional loop that forces the absolute scale from the NIF plasma data the instrument is meant to measure. No equation or claim in the abstract reduces a “prediction” or “first-principles result” to a fitted input by construction, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely by self-citation. Lab-to-NIF geometric and detector-response transfer uncertainties are real systematic-risk issues, but they are not circularity. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks; score 0 with empty steps is the correct finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review: no fitted numerical calibration constants or free parameters are visible in the text provided. The work rests on standard x-ray optics and metrology assumptions (Bragg diffraction from the named crystal geometries; tabulated K- and L-absorption edge energies as absolute energy standards; linear or characterizable detector response for CCD and single-photon counters). No new particles, forces, or other invented entities are introduced. Any crystal-specific reflectivity curves or scale factors that may appear in the full paper would be free parameters of the instrument model, not of a physical theory.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Bragg diffraction from Hall-geometry conical crystals and a von Hámos crystal maps source x-ray energy to detector position with the design energy bands covering Kr Heα, Lyα, and Heβ complexes.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the operating principle of the spectrometer; standard crystal-optics assumption, not proved in the paper.
  • domain assumption Tabulated K- and L-absorption edge energies of the calibration filters are accurate absolute energy standards under the laboratory source conditions.
    Abstract states multiple K- and L-absorption edge filters were used for absolute calibration; edge energies are taken from prior atomic data.
  • domain assumption CCD and single-photon-counting detector responses can be characterized well enough that measured counts convert to absolute photon flux at the crystal.
    Required for 'absolute' calibration; assumed in the abstract's description of the PPPL measurement chain.
  • domain assumption The time-integrated von Hámos channel provides a valid absolute reference for the streak-camera channels under NIF shot conditions.
    Abstract assigns the third crystal the role of in-situ calibration for streak-camera signals; transfer of that reference is a load-bearing modeling assumption.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6375 in / 2776 out tokens · 61964 ms · 2026-07-08T19:53:45.601980+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Kemp,G

    P\'erez,F. and Kemp,G. E. and Regan,S. P. and Barrios,M. A. and Pino,J. and Scott,H. and Ayers,S. and Chen,H. and Emig,J. and Colvin,J. D. and Bedzyk,M. and Shoup,M. J. and Agliata,A. and Yaakobi,B. and Marshall,F. J. and Hamilton,R. A. and Jaquez,J. and Farrell,M. and Nikroo,A. and Fournier,K. B. , title =. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =. 20...

  2. [2]

    D. H. Kalantar and P. M. Bell and T. S. Perry and N. Sewall and J. Kimbrough and F. Weber and C. Diamond and K. Piston , title =. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =. 2001 , doi =

  3. [3]

    J. R. Kimbrough and P. M. Bell and G. B. Christianson and F. D. Lee and D. H. Kalantar and T. S. Perry and N. R. Sewall and A. J. Wootton , title =. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =. 2001 , doi =

  4. [4]

    P. M. Nilson and F. Ehrne and C. Mileham and D. Mastrosimone and R. K. Jungquist and C. Taylor and C. R. Stillman and S. T. Ivancic and R. Boni and J. Hassett and D. J. Lonobile and R. W. Kidder and M. J. A high-resolving-power x-ray spectrometer for the OMEGA EP Laser (invited) , journal =. 2016 , doi =

  5. [5]

    Ma and R

    Hui Chen and T. Ma and R. Nora and M. A. Barrios and H. A. Scott and M. B. Schneider and L. Berzak Hopkins and D. T. Casey and B. A. Hammel and L. C. Jarrott and O. L. Landen and P. K. Patel and M. J. Rosenberg and B. K. Spears , title =. Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2017 , doi =

  6. [6]

    Ma and H

    T. Ma and H. Chen and P. K. Patel and M. B. Schneider and M. A. Barrios and D. T. Casey and H.-K. Chung and B. A. Hammel and L. F. Berzak Hopkins and L. C. Jarrott and S. F. Khan and B. Lahmann and R. Nora and M. J. Rosenberg and A. Pak and S. P. Regan and H. A. Scott and H. Sio and B. K. Spears and C. R. Weber , title =. Review of Scientific Instruments ...

  7. [7]

    Yuejiang Shi and Fudi Wang and Baonian Wan and Manfred Bitter and Sang Gon Lee and Jungyo Bak and Kenneth Hill and Jia Fu and Yingying Li and Ang Ti and Bili Ling , title=

  8. [8]

    K. W. Hill and M. Bitter and L. Delgado-Aparicio and D. Johnson and R. Feder and P. Beiersdorfer and J. Dunn and K. Morris and E. Wang and M. Reinke and Y. Podpaly and J. E. Rice and R. Barnsley and M. OMullane and S. G. Lee , journal=rsi, title=

  9. [9]

    Beiersdorfer and J

    P. Beiersdorfer and J. Clementson and J. Dunn and M. F. Gu and K. Morris and Y. Podpaly and E. Wang and M. Bitter and R. Feder and K.W. Hill and D. Johnson and R. Barnsley , title=

  10. [10]

    Indications of flow near maximum compression in layered deuterium-tritium implosions at the National Ignition Facility , author =. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.94.021202 , url =

  11. [11]

    Spears and David H

    Brian K. Spears and David H. Munro and Scott Sepke and Joseph Caggiano and Daniel Clark and Robert Hatarik and Andrea Kritcher and Daniel Sayre and Charles Yeamans and James Knauer and Terry Hilsabeck and Joe Kilkenny , title =. Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2015 , doi =

  12. [12]

    V. Yu. Glebov and T. C. Sangster and C. Stoeckl and J. P. Knauer and W. Theobald and K. L. Marshall and M. J. The National Ignition Facility neutron time-of-flight system and its initial performance (invited) , journal =. 2010 , doi =

  13. [13]

    Development of the indirect-drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain , publisher =

    John Lindl , collaboration =. Development of the indirect-drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain , publisher =. 1995 , journal =

  14. [14]

    and Amendt, Peter and Berger, Richard L

    Lindl, John D. and Amendt, Peter and Berger, Richard L. and Glendinning, S. Gail and Glenzer, Siegfried H. and Haan, Steven W. and Kauffman, Robert L. and Landen, Otto L. and Suter, Laurence J. The physics basis for ignition using indirect-drive targets on the N ational I gnition F acility. Physics of Plasmas (1994-present). 2004. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10...

  15. [15]

    Ingalls and E

    R. Ingalls and E. D. Crozier and J. E. Whitmore and A. J. Seary and J. M. Tranquada , title =. Journal of Applied Physics , volume =. 1980 , doi =

  16. [16]

    Bhalerao and Alain Polian and Michel Gauthier and Jean-Paul Iti

    Gopalkrishna M. Bhalerao and Alain Polian and Michel Gauthier and Jean-Paul Iti. High pressure x-ray diffraction and extended x-ray absorption fine structure studies on ternary alloy Zn1-xBexSe , journal =. 2010 , doi =

  17. [17]

    and Dejus, R

    S\' a nchez del Rio, M. and Dejus, R. J. XOP 2.1---A New Version of the X-ray Optics Software Toolkit. AIP Conf. Proc. 2004

  18. [18]

    X-ray server: an online resource for simulations of X-ray diffraction and scattering

    Stepanov, S. X-ray server: an online resource for simulations of X-ray diffraction and scattering. Adv. Comp. Methods for X-ray and Neutron Optics. 2004

  19. [19]

    and Bitter, M

    Lu, J. and Bitter, M. and Hill, K. W. and Delgado-Aparicio, L. F. and Efthimion, P. C. and Pablant, N. A. and Beiersdorfer, P. and Caughey, T. A. and Brunner, J. X-ray tests of a two-dimensional stigmatic imaging scheme with variable magnifications. Review of Scientific Instruments. 2014

  20. [20]

    K. W. Hill and M. Bitter and L. Delgado-Aparicio and P. C. Efthimion and R. Ellis and L. Gao and J. Maddox and N. A. Pablant and M. B. Schneider and H. Chen and S. Ayers and R. L. Kauffman and A. G. MacPhee and P. Beiersdorfer and R. Bettencourt and T. Ma and R. C. Nora and H. A. Scott and D. B. Thorn and J. D. Kilkenny and D. Nelson and M. Development of...

  21. [21]

    K. W. Hill and M. Bitter and P. C. Efthimion and R. Ellis and L. Gao and M. B. Schneider and H. Chen and S. Ayers and M. A. Barrios and P. Beiersdorfer and P. M. Bell and R. Bettencourt and D. K. Bradley and D. Casey and M. J. Edwards and B. A. Hammel and M. C. Hermann and W. W. Hsing and O. S. Jones and R. L. Kauffman and O. L. Landen and D. A. Liedahl a...

  22. [22]

    Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments , volume=

    T A Hall , title=. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments , volume=. 1984 , abstract=

  23. [23]

    Ma and N

    T. Ma and N. Izumi and R. Tommasini and D. K. Bradley and P. Bell and C. J. Cerjan and S. Dixit and T. D. Imaging of high-energy x-ray emission from cryogenic thermonuclear fuel implosions on the NIF , journal =. 2012 , doi =