Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 53 references

Numerical-aperture transfer in holotomography with a deterministic diffusion prior

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-08 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Diffusion prior recovers high-NA 3D refractive index volumes from low-NA holotomography in five steps

desk verdict Sound formulation, honest about its own limits, but validation is operator-inversion not NA transfer — needs physical data to earn its claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05824 v1 pith:CIMKGADC submitted 2026-07-07 physics.optics

Dong-min Ryu , Jeong-hyun Roh , Woon-soo Lee , Hansol Yoon , Hyun-seok Min , Yongkeun Park This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.30.Wb87.57.-s42.40.-i
keywords diffusionvolumesdenoiserdeterministicdiffusion-priorevaluationsfiveholotomography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents ResShift-ODE, a method that uses a deterministic diffusion prior to transfer low-numerical-aperture (NA) refractive-index (RI) tomograms to high-NA-equivalent 3D volumes without changing microscope hardware. The authors formulate NA transfer as an inverse problem: a low-NA measurement is modeled as a Fourier-support restriction of the true high-NA volume, meaning certain spatial frequencies are not merely blurred but entirely absent. To recover them, the method anchors a residual-shifting diffusion process to the measured low-NA volume and reformulates the reverse sampling as a probability-flow ordinary differential equation (ODE), yielding deterministic, reproducible output in five network evaluations. On held-out emulated test volumes spanning yeast, HepG2 cells, and K562 lymphoblasts, the recovered volumes match high-NA references with refractive-index errors of 0.002–0.003 for over 99% of voxels. Crucially, Fourier analysis shows the method populates the lateral high-frequency band that the low-NA aperture truncates while leaving the axial missing cone unfilled, providing a physics-grounded check against hallucinated structure. The central object carrying the argument is the combination of the explicit NA-limited Fourier-domain forward operator and the measurement-anchored deterministic ODE sampler: together they constrain the prior to complete only the frequencies the optics annihilated, rather than synthesizing arbitrary detail.

What carries the argument

ResShift-ODE: a residual-shifting diffusion prior whose reverse process is reformulated as a probability-flow ODE, anchored to the low-NA measurement as its endpoint rather than to a Gaussian noise prior. The forward operator is an explicit NA-limited Fourier-support mask that models what a low-NA holotomography system can and cannot measure. Together, the anchor and the operator ensure the prior completes only the annihilated lateral frequency band while preserving the axial missing cone.

What would settle it

Apply the trained model to a physically acquired low-NA holotomography volume of a specimen for which a registered high-NA acquisition of the same specimen exists. If the recovered volume fails to match the high-NA reference—particularly in the lateral high-frequency annulus outside the low-NA support—then the method inverts the analytic operator but does not achieve physical NA transfer.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The key result is that a residual-shifted diffusion prior, made deterministic via a probability-flow ODE, can invert a known Fourier-band-limiting operator to recover high-NA-equivalent 3D refractive-index structure from low-NA holotomography inputs, while preserving the axial missing cone that should remain empty. The method achieves this in five denoiser evaluations per volume, making it roughly 166 times faster than a standard 1000-step diffusion model while maintaining comparable reconstruction fidelity to a deterministic U-Net regressor. The measurement-anchored design ensures that recovered high-frequency content is constrained by the measured low-NA support, and the asymmetric Fourier

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a simple analytic Fourier-support mask faithfully captures the dominant information loss of a real physical low-NA microscope. The mask omits pupil apodization, partial coherence, and optical aberration. If this idealized operator is not a faithful surrogate for actual low-NA optics, the quantitative results measure inversion of a mathematical operator rather than real-world NA transfer performance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the method generalizes to physical low-NA acquisitions, existing multiwell-plate holotomography systems could gain high-NA-equivalent resolution through a software update, enabling label-free subcellular imaging in high-throughput drug screening without new optics.
  • The measurement-anchored, cone-preserving behavior offers a falsifiable criterion for generative priors in other coherent imaging inverse problems: the model should not fill spectral regions that the physics says are unmeasurable.
  • The deterministic five-step ODE sampler makes diffusion-prior inference practical for post-acquisition screening pipelines, where stochastic sampling chains taking hours per volume would be prohibitive.
  • The same construction—explicit band-limiting operator plus measurement-anchored diffusion prior—could extend to other coherent modalities with defined information gaps, such as limited-angle tomography, synthetic-aperture extension, or sub-pupil imaging.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents ResShift-ODE, a deterministic diffusion-prior framework for transferring low-NA refractive-index (RI) tomograms to high-NA-equivalent volumes in holotomography (HT). The method extends residual-shifting diffusion to 3D RI data, reformulates the reverse process as a probability-flow ODE for reproducible five-step inference, and is evaluated on emulated low-NA/high-NA pairs generated by an analytic Fourier-support restriction operator (Eq. 1). The paper reports RI errors of 0.002–0.003 for >99% of voxels on three held-out test volumes (one per cell type), demonstrates that the axial missing cone is not artificially filled, and shows substantial speedup over a 1000-step DDPM baseline. The mathematical formulation is internally consistent, the Fourier-domain analysis of missing-cone preservation is a sound physical check, and the paper is notably transparent about the scope and limitations of its evaluation.

Significance. The problem formulation—NA transfer as a diffusion-prior inverse problem under an explicit band-limiting operator—is well-motivated and distinct from prior artifact-suppression work in HT. The deterministic ODE sampler yielding reproducible inference in five denoiser evaluations is a practical contribution for screening workflows. The Fourier-domain cone-preservation check provides a falsifiable, modality-agnostic acceptance criterion. The bead-phantom validation of the emulation operator (Fig. 2a,b) and the multi-cell-type training corpus are commendable design choices. However, the quantitative headline results are computed on emulated pairs generated by the same analytic operator used in training, which the paper itself acknowledges measures operator-inversion fidelity rather than real-world NA-transfer performance. This limits the current evidence to a proof-of-principle demonstration under controlled physics.

major comments (3)
  1. §3.2–3.3: The headline metric (>99% of voxels within RI error 0.002–0.003) is, as the paper transparently states, 'dominated by the preserved low-NA passband, where recovery reduces to passing through measured frequencies.' The decisive quantity—recovery accuracy in the lateral annulus outside K_L but within K_H—is examined only qualitatively in Fig. 3d. No quantitative metric for spectral power recovery in this annulus is provided. Without such a metric, the central claim of NA transfer (as opposed to passband preservation) is supported by visual inspection alone. A quantitative out-of-band recovery metric (e.g., spectral power ratio in the annulus K_H ∖ K_L, or annulus-restricted PSNR/SSIM) would substantially strengthen the evidence and is necessary for the claim to be load-bearing.
  2. §3.1: The evaluation uses three held-out test volumes (one per cell type), and all three cell types are represented in training. The paper acknowledges that 'genuine transfer to held-out cell types remains untested.' While this is honestly stated, it means the cross-cell-type generalization claim is not statistically supported. A leave-one-class-out evaluation, even on a single held-out class, would provide meaningful evidence that the prior is anchored to the shared forward operator rather than to cell-type-specific image statistics. If this is infeasible with the current dataset size, the claim of cross-cell-type transfer should be further qualified in the abstract and conclusion.
  3. Table 1, HepG2 row: ResShift-ODE achieves PSNR 40.068 dB versus 3D U-Net's 39.677 dB and 3D ResShift's 39.923 dB. The paper correctly notes that differences below ~1 dB should not be interpreted as statistical ranking. However, the four-model comparison is performed on a single volume, making it impossible to assess whether ResShift-ODE offers a meaningful accuracy advantage over the simpler 3D U-Net. Given that the U-Net is ~5.8× faster, the practical case for ResShift-ODE rests almost entirely on the Fourier-domain cone-preservation behavior and the measurement-anchoring argument. The paper should more explicitly frame the contribution as a generative-prior framework with interpretable spectral behavior rather than a metric improvement over deterministic regression.
minor comments (6)
  1. §2.2: The bead-phantom validation (Fig. 2a,b) compares emulated and measured low-NA profiles qualitatively. A quantitative comparison metric (e.g., RI-profile RMSE or FWHM ratio) would strengthen the operator-fidelity claim.
  2. §2.3, Eq. (2): The scalar noise scale κ is stated to be in RI units, with its numerical value deferred to Supplementary S2. Including the value in the main text would help readers assess the noise regime.
  3. §3.4, Table 1: The relative wall-clock cost for the Yeast and K562 rows is listed as ~5.8×, identical to the HepG2 row, but the wall-clock time is also listed as 217.98 s for all three. If these are the same measurement, this should be clarified; if they are independent measurements that happen to coincide, a note would help.
  4. Fig. 3: The Fourier-domain amplitude projections in panel (d) are shown for one cell type (HepG2). Including the corresponding projections for yeast and K562, or at minimum confirming in text that the same behavior holds, would aid interpretation.
  5. §4, Discussion: The sentence beginning 'A residual-shifted diffusion prior is a natural fit...' could benefit from a more specific justification of why the residual-shifting formulation is preferable to standard DDPM conditioning for this particular inverse problem, beyond the computational advantage of fewer steps.
  6. Reference [28] is dated 2026; if this is a preprint, the arXiv identifier or DOI should be included. Similarly, reference [51] is dated 2026 with no volume/page information.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. All three major comments are well-taken. We address each below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3.2–3.3: No quantitative metric for spectral power recovery in the lateral annulus K_H ∖ K_L; the central NA-transfer claim rests on visual inspection of Fig. 3d alone.

    Authors: The referee is correct. The headline voxel-error metric is dominated by the preserved low-NA passband, and the decisive out-of-band recovery is currently supported only qualitatively. We will add a quantitative annulus-restricted metric in the revised manuscript. Specifically, we will compute the spectral power ratio |X̂(k)|² / |X_H(k)|² averaged over the lateral annulus K_H ∖ K_L (and separately over K_L for reference), as well as an annulus-restricted PSNR, for each held-out test volume. These quantities are computable from the existing test data and Fourier transforms already used for Fig. 3d, so no new acquisitions are required. We agree that without such a metric the NA-transfer claim is not load-bearing, and we will present the annulus metric alongside the full-volume metrics in a revised Table 1 and/or an expanded §3.3. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §3.1: Cross-cell-type generalization is not statistically supported because all three cell types appear in training; a leave-one-class-out evaluation is needed, or the claim should be further qualified.

    Authors: We agree that the current evaluation does not test genuine cross-cell-type transfer. We will attempt a leave-one-class-out experiment: for each of the three cell types, we will retrain on the remaining two classes (approximately 34–40 paired volumes depending on the split) and evaluate on the held-out class. We acknowledge that with only two classes in training and ~34–40 volumes, the statistical power will be limited and the results may show degraded performance relative to the multi-class model. However, even a single leave-one-class-out result per class would provide a first indication of whether the prior is anchored to the shared forward operator or to cell-type-specific statistics. If the leave-one-class-out results are inconclusive due to the small training set, we will state this explicitly and further qualify the cross-cell-type transfer claim in the abstract and conclusion, as the referee suggests. In either case, the abstract and conclusion will be revised to avoid implying statistically supported cross-cell-type generalization. revision: partial

  3. Referee: Table 1, HepG2 row: ResShift-ODE's PSNR advantage over 3D U-Net is below 1 dB on a single volume; given the U-Net is ~5.8× faster, the paper should more explicitly frame the contribution as a generative-prior framework with interpretable spectral behavior rather than a metric improvement over deterministic regression.

    Authors: We agree with this framing. The manuscript already notes that sub-1-dB differences on a single volume should not be interpreted as a statistical ranking, and the Discussion states that ResShift-ODE should not be viewed as a scalar-metric replacement for a deterministic regressor. However, the referee is right that this framing should be more prominent. In the revision we will: (i) state explicitly in the abstract that the contribution is a generative-prior framework with interpretable spectral behavior, not a PSNR improvement over deterministic regression; (ii) move the 'not a metric replacement' qualification from the Discussion into the Results section adjacent to Table 1; and (iii) emphasize that the practical case for ResShift-ODE rests on the Fourier-domain cone-preservation behavior and measurement-anchoring argument, not on scalar metric gains over the faster U-Net. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • The leave-one-class-out evaluation (Comment 2) will be attempted, but with only ~34–40 training volumes per fold, the results may not be statistically conclusive. If performance degrades substantially, we will not be able to distinguish insufficient training data from failure of operator-anchored generalization. We will report the results transparently regardless of outcome.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is transparent that training and test pairs come from the same analytic operator, and explicitly frames its metrics as operator-inversion fidelity rather than independent physical validation.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained against its stated scope. The forward operator (Eq. 1) is an analytic Fourier-support restriction applied to high-NA data to create emulated low-NA inputs. The model is trained and tested on pairs generated by this same operator. While this means the headline metrics (>99% of voxels within RI error 0.002-0.003) quantify inversion of a known operator rather than real-world NA transfer, the paper is explicitly transparent about this: it states the metrics 'quantify inversion fidelity for the analytic operator, not independent validation on physical low-NA acquisitions,' acknowledges they are 'dominated by the preserved low-NA support,' and notes the cone-preservation behavior is 'guaranteed by construction' since 'every pair is produced by the same operator that annihilates the axial cone.' The bead-phantom validation (Fig. 2a,b) provides an independent (if limited) check of the emulation operator against a physical low-NA measurement. The diffusion framework (ResShift-ODE) is adapted from external work [34,38-43] with proper attribution, and the equivalence to Flow Matching / rectified flow is stated openly. The ODE reformulation is standard probability-flow machinery, not a self-cited novelty. The paper claims novelty only for the problem formulation (NA transfer under an explicit operator), not for the sampler. There is no self-citation chain that load-bears the central claim, no fitted parameter renamed as prediction, and no definition that reduces to its output. The limitation is one of validation scope (emulated pairs only), which the paper acknowledges, not of circular reasoning. Score 2 reflects the single minor concern that the headline metrics are partly determined by construction (passband preservation), but the paper itself flags this rather than presenting it as independent validation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, particles, or forces. The method is a computational framework built from known mathematical components (diffusion models, ODE samplers, Fourier operators) applied to existing microscopy data. The free parameters are standard machine learning training hyperparameters and noise schedules, not physically invented constants.

free parameters (3)
  • kappa (scalar noise scale) = not specified in main text; Supplementary S2
    Controls the noise scale of the residual-shifting kernel in the forward SDE (Eq. 2).
  • eta_t schedule (shape and coefficients) = not specified in main text; Supplementary S2
    Determines the residual-shifting schedule; the paper notes the proposed model differs from stochastic ResShift baseline in this schedule.
  • Network weights (denoiser) = trained on 51 paired volumes
    The learned 3D U-Net denoiser parameters, trained on emulated pairs.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The low-NA observation is modeled as a coherent Fourier-support restriction of the high-NA RI volume (Eq. 1).
    Section 2.1. The support mask omits pupil apodization, partial coherence, and aberration, representing an upper bound on operator fidelity.
  • standard math The discrete residual-shifting chain is the Euler-Maruyama discretization of an underlying SDE.
    Section 2.3, used to derive the continuous-time forward process in Eq. 2.
  • standard math Tweedie's identity connects the score term to the denoiser output.
    Section 2.3, used to reduce the reverse ODE drift to a single denoiser evaluation per step.
  • domain assumption The numerical low-NA emulation captures the dominant information loss of a real low-NA acquisition.
    Section 4 (Discussion). Explicitly stated as the key assumption; if false, practical deployment requires registered real data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Numerical-aperture transfer in holotomography with a deterministic diffusion prior." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CIMKGADC

@misc{pith2026260705824,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Numerical-aperture transfer in holotomography with a deterministic diffusion prior},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CIMKGADC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05824}
}
read the original abstract

High-throughput holotomography often relies on long-working-distance, multiwell-compatible optics that reduce illumination numerical aperture (NA) and limit access to high spatial frequencies. Here we present ResShift-ODE, a deterministic diffusion-prior framework that transfers low-NA refractive-index (RI) tomograms to high-NA-equivalent volumes without modifying the acquisition hardware. We formulate low-NA-to-high-NA transfer as a diffusion-prior inverse problem under an explicit NA-limited Fourier-domain forward operator, distinct from suppressing artifacts within an already measured passband. The method extends residual-shifting diffusion to volumetric RI data and reformulates the reverse process as a probability-flow ordinary differential equation, enabling reproducible inference in five denoiser evaluations. On held-out emulated-pair test volumes, inferred volumes matched high-NA references with RI errors of 0.002-0.003 for >99% of voxels, while Fourier analysis confirmed measurement-anchored lateral-band recovery without filling the axial missing cone. 3D ResShift-ODE required five denoiser evaluations per volume, incurring ~5.8x the cost of a 3D U-Net while remaining ~166x faster than a 1000-step 3D denoising diffusion probabilistic model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05824 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Concept and algorithm of ResShift-ODE for NA transfer in HT. (a) Low-NA illumination restricts Fourier-space coverage, reducing lateral bandwidth and increasing axial elongation, whereas high-NA illumination expands the synthetic aperture. Schematic Fourier supports are shown below each configuration. (b) Training workflow: paired low-NA inputs are generated from measured high￾NA RI volumes using the NA-limited forw… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Cross-cell-type high-NA inference and error analysis. ResShift-ODE was evaluated on three representative cell morphologies: (a) yeast, (b) HepG2, and (c) K562. For each class, orthogonal RI sections compare the low-NA input, inferred high-NA-equivalent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data,

    E. Wolf, "Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data," Optics Communications 1, 153–156 (1969)

    work page 1969

  2. [2]

    Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine,

    Y. Park, C. Depeursinge, and G. Popescu, "Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine," Nature Photon 12, 578–589 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Artificial intelligence-enabled quantitative phase imaging methods for life sciences,

    J. Park, B. Bai, D. Ryu, T. Liu, C. Lee, Y. Luo, M. J. Lee, L. Huang, J. Shin, and Y. Zhang, "Artificial intelligence-enabled quantitative phase imaging methods for life sciences," Nature methods 20, 1645–1660 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Holotomography,

    G. Kim, H. Hugonnet, K. Kim, J.-H. Lee, S. S. Lee, J. Ha, C. Lee, H. Park, K.-J. Yoon, and Y. Shin, "Holotomography," Nature Reviews Methods Primers 4, 51 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Interference Microscopy and Mass Determination,

    R. Barer, "Interference Microscopy and Mass Determination," Nature 169, 366–367 (1952)

    work page 1952

  6. [6]

    Optical imaging of cell mass and growth dynamics,

    G. Popescu, Y. Park, N. Lue, C. Best-Popescu, L. Deflores, R. R. Dasari, M. S. Feld, and K. Badizadegan, "Optical imaging of cell mass and growth dynamics," American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 295, C538–C544 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    MIRO2-mediated mitochondrial transfer from cancer cells induces cancer-associated fibroblast differentiation,

    M. Cangkrama, H. Liu, X. Wu, J. Yates, J. Whipman, C. G. Gäbelein, M. Matsushita, L. Ferrarese, S. Sander, F. Castro-Giner, S. Asawa, M. K. Sznurkowska, M. Kopf, J. Dengjel, V. Boeva, N. Aceto, J. A. Vorholt, and S. Werner, "MIRO2-mediated mitochondrial transfer from cancer cells induces cancer-associated fibroblast differentiation," Nat Cancer (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Recent advances in label-free imaging and quantification techniques for the study of lipid droplets in cells,

    H. Kim, S. Oh, S. Lee, K. suk Lee, and Y. Park, "Recent advances in label-free imaging and quantification techniques for the study of lipid droplets in cells," Current Opinion in Cell Biology 87, 102342 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Three-dimensional label-free imaging and quantification of lipid droplets in live hepatocytes,

    K. Kim, S. Lee, J. Yoon, J. Heo, C. Choi, and Y. Park, "Three-dimensional label-free imaging and quantification of lipid droplets in live hepatocytes," Sci Rep 6, 36815 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    TGF-β-induced DACT1 biomolecular condensates repress Wnt signalling to promote bone metastasis,

    M. Esposito, C. Fang, K. C. Cook, N. Park, Y. Wei, C. Spadazzi, D. Bracha, R. T. Gunaratna, G. Laevsky, and C. J. DeCoste, "TGF-β-induced DACT1 biomolecular condensates repress Wnt signalling to promote bone metastasis," Nature cell biology 23, 257–267 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    OASL phase condensation induces amyloid-like fibrillation of RIPK3 to promote virus-induced necroptosis,

    S.-A. Lee, L.-C. Chang, W. Jung, J. W. Bowman, D. Kim, W. Chen, S.-S. Foo, Y. J. Choi, U. Y. Choi, A. Bowling, J.-S. Yoo, and J. U. Jung, "OASL phase condensation induces amyloid-like fibrillation of RIPK3 to promote virus-induced necroptosis," Nat Cell Biol 25, 92–107 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    RNA-mediated demixing transition of low-density condensates,

    T. Kim, J. Yoo, S. Do, D. S. Hwang, Y. Park, and Y. Shin, "RNA-mediated demixing transition of low-density condensates," Nat Commun 14, 2425 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Diverse bat organoids provide pathophysiological models for zoonotic viruses,

    H. Kim, S.-Y. Heo, Y.-I. Kim, D. Park, M. P. A. N, S. Hwang, Y. Lee, H. Jang, J.-W. Ahn, J. Ha, S. Park, H. Y. Ji, S. Kim, I. Choi, W. Kwon, J. Kim, K. Kim, J. Gil, B. Jeong, J. C. D. Lazarte, R. Rollon, J. H. Choi, E. H. Kim, S.-G. Jang, H. K. Kim, B.-Y. Jeon, G. Kayali, R. J...

    2025

  6. [14]

    Long-term three-dimensional high-resolution imaging of live unlabeled small intestinal organoids via low-coherence holotomography,

    M. J. Lee, J. Lee, J. Ha, G. Kim, H.-J. Kim, S. Lee, B.-K. Koo, and Y. Park, "Long-term three-dimensional high-resolution imaging of live unlabeled small intestinal organoids via low-coherence holotomography," Exp Mol Med 56, 2162–2170 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Revealing 3D microanatomical structures of unlabeled thick cancer tissues using holotomography and virtual H&E staining,

    J. Park, S.-J. Shin, G. Kim, H. Cho, D. Ryu, D. Ahn, J. E. Heo, J. R. Clemenceau, I. Barnfather, and M. Kim, "Revealing 3D microanatomical structures of unlabeled thick cancer tissues using holotomography and virtual H&E staining," Nature communications 16, 4781 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Multiscale label-free volumetric holographic histopathology of thick- tissue slides with subcellular resolution,

    H. Hugonnet, Y. W. Kim, M. Lee, S. Shin, R. H. Hruban, S.-M. Hong, and Y. Park, "Multiscale label-free volumetric holographic histopathology of thick- tissue slides with subcellular resolution," Adv. Photon. 3, 026004 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Novel Leech Antimicrobial Peptides, Hirunipins: Real‐Time 3D Monitoring of Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Mechanisms Using Optical Diffraction Tomography,

    S. D. Kumar, J. Park, N. K. Radhakrishnan, Y. P. Aryal, G. Jeong, I. Pyo, B. Ganbaatar, C. W. Lee, S. Yang, Y. Shin, S. Subramaniyam, Y. Lim, S. Kim, S. Lee, S. Y. Shin, and S. Cho, "Novel Leech Antimicrobial Peptides, Hirunipins: Real‐Time 3D Monitoring of Antimicrobial and A...

    2025

  10. [18]

    Rapid species identification of pathogenic bacteria from a minute quantity exploiting three-dimensional quantitative phase imaging and artificial neural network,

    G. Kim, D. Ahn, M. Kang, J. Park, D. Ryu, Y. Jo, J. Song, J. S. Ryu, G. Choi, H. J. Chung, K. Kim, D. R. Chung, I. Y. Yoo, H. J. Huh, H. Min, N. Y. Lee, and Y. Park, "Rapid species identification of pathogenic bacteria from a minute quantity exploiting three-dimensional quanti...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Comparative study of iterative reconstruction algorithms for missing cone problems in optical diffraction tomography,

    J. Lim, K. Lee, K. H. Jin, S. Shin, S. Lee, Y. Park, and J. C. Ye, "Comparative study of iterative reconstruction algorithms for missing cone problems in optical diffraction tomography," Opt. Express 23, 16933 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    DeepRegularizer: Rapid Resolution Enhancement of Tomographic Imaging Using Deep Learning,

    D. Ryu, D. Ryu, Y. Baek, H. Cho, G. Kim, Y. S. Kim, Y. Lee, Y. Kim, J. C. Ye, H.-S. Min, and Y. Park, "DeepRegularizer: Rapid Resolution Enhancement of Tomographic Imaging Using Deep Learning," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 40, 1508–1518 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Missing Cone Artifact Removal in ODT Using Unsupervised Deep Learning in the Projection Domain,

    H. Chung, J. Huh, G. Kim, Y. K. Park, and J. C. Ye, "Missing Cone Artifact Removal in ODT Using Unsupervised Deep Learning in the Projection Domain," IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging 7, 747–758 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Segment and support: a dual-purpose deep learning solution for limited angle holographic tomography,

    M. Gontarz, W. Krauze, V. Dutta, and M. Kujawińska, "Segment and support: a dual-purpose deep learning solution for limited angle holographic tomography," Opt. Express 32, 46798 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    In-silico clearing approach for deep refractive index tomography by partial reconstruction and wave-backpropagation,

    O. Yasuhiko and K. Takeuchi, "In-silico clearing approach for deep refractive index tomography by partial reconstruction and wave-backpropagation," Light: Science & Applications 12, 101 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Deep-learning projector for optical diffraction tomography,

    F. Yang, T. Pham, H. Gupta, M. Unser, and J. Ma, "Deep-learning projector for optical diffraction tomography," Opt. Express 28, 3905 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, "Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models," (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Microscopy image reconstruction with physics-informed denoising diffusion probabilistic model,

    R. Li, G. Della Maggiora, V. Andriasyan, A. Petkidis, A. Yushkevich, N. Deshpande, M. Kudryashev, and A. Yakimovich, "Microscopy image reconstruction with physics-informed denoising diffusion probabilistic model," Commun Eng 3, 186 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Pixel super-resolved virtual staining of label-free tissue using diffusion models,

    Y. Zhang, L. Huang, N. Pillar, Y. Li, H. Chen, and A. Ozcan, "Pixel super-resolved virtual staining of label-free tissue using diffusion models," Nat Commun 16, 5016 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Score-based diffusion models for diffuse optical tomography with uncertainty quantification,

    F. Schneider, M. Mozumder, K. Tamarov, L. Taghizadeh, T. Tarvainen, T. Helin, and D.-L. Duong, "Score-based diffusion models for diffuse optical tomography with uncertainty quantification," (2026)

    2026

  21. [29]

    Neural Inverse Scattering with Score-based Regularization,

    Y. Gao, W. Guo, and Y. Sun, "Neural Inverse Scattering with Score-based Regularization," (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problems,

    H. Chung, J. Kim, M. T. Mccann, M. L. Klasky, and J. C. Ye, "Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problems," (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    ILVR: Conditioning Method for Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models,

    J. Choi, S. Kim, Y. Jeong, Y. Gwon, and S. Yoon, "ILVR: Conditioning Method for Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models," in 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (IEEE, 2021), pp. 14347–14356

    2021

  24. [32]

    Come-Closer-Diffuse-Faster: Accelerating Conditional Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems through Stochastic Contraction,

    H. Chung, B. Sim, and J. C. Ye, "Come-Closer-Diffuse-Faster: Accelerating Conditional Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems through Stochastic Contraction," in 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 12403–12412

    2022

  25. [33]

    Solving 3D Inverse Problems using Pre-trained 2D Diffusion Models,

    H. Chung, D. Ryu, M. T. McCann, M. L. Klasky, and J. C. Ye, "Solving 3D Inverse Problems using Pre-trained 2D Diffusion Models," in 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2023), pp. 22542–22551

    2023

  26. [34]

    ResShift: Efficient Diffusion Model for Image Super-resolution by Residual Shifting,

    Z. Yue, J. Wang, and C. C. Loy, "ResShift: Efficient Diffusion Model for Image Super-resolution by Residual Shifting," (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Deep learning enables cross-modality super- resolution in fluorescence microscopy,

    H. Wang, Y. Rivenson, Y. Jin, Z. Wei, R. Gao, H. Günaydın, L. A. Bentolila, C. Kural, and A. Ozcan, "Deep learning enables cross-modality super- resolution in fluorescence microscopy," Nat Methods 16, 103–110 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Content-aware image restoration: pushing the limits of fluorescence microscopy,

    M. Weigert, U. Schmidt, T. Boothe, A. Müller, A. Dibrov, A. Jain, B. Wilhelm, D. Schmidt, C. Broaddus, S. Culley, M. Rocha-Martins, F. Segovia- Miranda, C. Norden, R. Henriques, M. Zerial, M. Solimena, J. Rink, P. Tomancak, L. Royer, F. Jug, and E. W. Myers, "Content-aware ima...

    2018

  29. [37]

    Applications, promises, and pitfalls of deep learning for fluorescence image reconstruction,

    C. Belthangady and L. A. Royer, "Applications, promises, and pitfalls of deep learning for fluorescence image reconstruction," Nat Methods 16, 1215–1225 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models,

    J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, "Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models," (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations,

    Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole, "Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations," (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models,

    T. Karras, M. Aittala, T. Aila, and S. Laine, "Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models," (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Flow Matching for Generative Modeling,

    Y. Lipman, R. T. Q. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel, and M. Le, "Flow Matching for Generative Modeling," (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow,

    X. Liu, C. Gong, and Q. Liu, "Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow," (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    I^2SB: Image-to-Image Schrödinger Bridge,

    G.-H. Liu, A. Vahdat, D.-A. Huang, E. A. Theodorou, W. Nie, and A. Anandkumar, "I^2SB: Image-to-Image Schrödinger Bridge," (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,

    Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, "Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity," IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 600–612 (2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    This Microtubule Does Not Exist: Super‐Resolution Microscopy Image Generation by a Diffusion Model,

    A. Saguy, T. Nahimov, M. Lehrman, E. Gómez‐de‐Mariscal, I. Hidalgo‐Cenalmor, O. Alalouf, A. Balakrishnan, M. Heilemann, R. Henriques, and Y. Shechtman, "This Microtubule Does Not Exist: Super‐Resolution Microscopy Image Generation by a Diffusion Model," Small Methods 9, 2400672 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    Score-based diffusion models for accelerated MRI,

    H. Chung and J. C. Ye, "Score-based diffusion models for accelerated MRI," Medical Image Analysis 80, 102479 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Consistency Models,

    Y. Song, P. Dhariwal, M. Chen, and I. Sutskever, "Consistency Models," (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Progressive Distillation for Fast Sampling of Diffusion Models,

    T. Salimans and J. Ho, "Progressive Distillation for Fast Sampling of Diffusion Models," (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Biomedical applications of holographic microspectroscopy [Invited],

    J. Jung, K. Kim, H. Yu, K. Lee, S. Lee, S. Nahm, H. Park, and Y. Park, "Biomedical applications of holographic microspectroscopy [Invited]," Appl. Opt. 53, G111 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    Tomographic measurement of dielectric tensors at optical frequency,

    S. Shin, J. Eun, S. S. Lee, C. Lee, H. Hugonnet, D. K. Yoon, S.-H. Kim, J. Jeong, and Y. Park, "Tomographic measurement of dielectric tensors at optical frequency," Nature Materials 21, 317–324 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Incoherent dielectric tensor tomography for quantitative three-dimensional measurement of biaxial anisotropy,

    J. Lee, Y. W. Kim, H. Chang, H. Hugonnet, C. Oh, S. Lee, S.-M. Hong, S. Jeon, and Y. Park, "Incoherent dielectric tensor tomography for quantitative three-dimensional measurement of biaxial anisotropy," Nat. Photon. (2026)

    2026

  44. [52]

    From genotype to phenotype: decoding mutations in blasts by holo-tomographic flow cytometry,

    D. Pirone, C. Di Natale, M. Di Summa, N. Mosca, G. Giugliano, M. Schiavo, D. Florio, D. Marasco, P. L. Maffettone, L. Miccio, P. Memmolo, and P. Ferraro, "From genotype to phenotype: decoding mutations in blasts by holo-tomographic flow cytometry," Light Sci Appl 14, 233 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    High-precision label-free virtual H&E staining of 3D holotomography using DAPI-guided conditional diffusion learning,

    T. Bak, S. Kim, D. Ahn, H. Min, and J. Lee, "High-precision label-free virtual H&E staining of 3D holotomography using DAPI-guided conditional diffusion learning," Int J CARS (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed July 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.