Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 32 references

The Damped Waves Equation and generalized Cosine and Sine families on Banach spaces

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-07-08 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Damping Tames Unbounded Wave Operators on Banach Spaces

desk verdict Solid framework for damped waves on Banach spaces with unbounded damping; proofs check out under stated hypotheses read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05856 v1 pith:SB6SJ4NH submitted 2026-07-07 math.AP

Yuri Latushkin , Alin Pogan This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 37L1547D0634G10
keywords dampedwaveequationBanachspacecosineandsinefamiliesC0-groupquadraticoperatorpencilunboundeddampingwell-posednessmildsolutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the abstract damped wave equation u'' + 2Bu' = Au on a Banach space X, where both A and the damping operator B may be unbounded. The central construction recasts this second-order equation as a first-order system by substituting v = u' + Bu, yielding a block operator G = [[-B, I], [A+B^2, -B]]. The authors identify a set of conditions, called Hypothesis (HAB), under which G generates a C0-group on an appropriate product space Y x X. This group generation is the linchpin: it lets the authors define generalized cosine and sine families C_{A,B}(t) and S_{A,B}(t) that represent the unique mild and classical solutions of the damped wave equation, directly paralleling the classical undamped theory where B=0 and A generates a cosine family. The key technical device is a decomposition G = G0 + V0, where G0 captures the leading-order unbounded terms and V0 is a bounded perturbation. Lemma 2.1 gives an explicit formula for the group generated by G0 by factoring the associated quadratic pencil Q0(λ) = (λI - A0^+)(λI - A0^-), where A0^± := ±A0 - B0. This factorization works because the leading-order operators A0 and B0 commute, even though the full operators A and B need not. The paper then proves that the generalized cosine and sine families inherit the structural properties familiar from the undamped case: invariant subspaces, exponential growth bounds, differentiability of trajectories, and trigonometric-type functional identities (addition formulas). The authors also show that two natural notions of mild solution — one via Laplace transform and one via integral equation — coincide. Throughout, the framework is designed for Banach spaces, avoiding reliance on Hilbert-space tools such as self-adjointness or spectral decompositions.

What carries the argument

Hypothesis (HAB): conditions on commuting leading-order operators A0, B0 (generators of C0-groups) with A = A0^2 - B0^2 + W0 and B = B0 + B1; Lemma 2.1 giving explicit group generation for G0 via pencil factorization Q0(λ) = (λI - A0^+)(λI - A0^-); the decomposition G = G0 + V0 with V0 bounded; generalized cosine C_{A,B}(t) and sine S_{A,B}(t) families defined from the group blocks; equivalence of Laplace-transform and integral notions of mild solution.

What would settle it

Find a concrete PDE model of the form u'' + 2Bu' = Au on a Banach space where A and B satisfy natural domain conditions but A0^± = ±A0 - B0 fail to generate C0-groups, and check whether the damped wave equation is nevertheless well-posed — which would show that (HAB) is sufficient but not necessary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under Hypothesis (HAB), the block operator G = [[-B, I], [A+B^2, -B]] generates a C0-group on Y x X (with Y = dom(A0)), and the generalized cosine and sine families extracted from this group provide unique mild and classical solutions to u'' + 2Bu' = Au even when B is unbounded. The construction rests on factoring the quadratic pencil of the leading-order operators, which is possible because A0 and B0 commute even though the full A and B do not. The resulting families satisfy regularity, invariance, growth, and trigonometric-identity properties analogous to the classical undamped cosine and sine theory.

Load-bearing premise

Hypothesis (HAB)(iii) requires that the shifted operators A0^± := ±A0 - B0 each generate C0-groups on X. This is the load-bearing premise: the entire explicit construction of the group generated by G0 depends on factoring the quadratic pencil as (λI - A0^+)(λI - A0^-), which requires both A0^+ and A0^- to have well-behaved resolvents on a half-plane. If either fails to be a group generator, the factorization does not yield bounded inverses and the decomposition of G into a 's

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The framework applies to damped wave, Klein-Gordon, and higher-order PDE models where the damping operator is a first- or higher-order differential operator, including cases on L^p(R^k) for p ≠ 2 and coupled systems.
  • There exist parameter regimes (e.g., Example 6.5 with γ ∈ (-1,0)) where the undamped equation is ill-posed because A does not generate a cosine family, yet the damped equation is well-posed — damping restores well-posedness.
  • The trigonometric identities for C_{A,B} and S_{A,B} generalize the classical addition formulas and d'Alembert-type identities, but acquire extra terms involving B that vanish when B=0.
  • The phase space Y x X is postulated abstractly in Hypothesis (ABY) and then concretely realized as dom(A0) x X under (HAB); a companion result announced as [21] addresses uniqueness of this phase space, completing the parallel with the undamped theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The requirement that A0^± := ±A0 - B0 generate C0-groups is the true gatekeeper of the theory. If this fails, the pencil factorization collapses and the explicit group formula is unavailable. Whether weaker conditions (e.g., A0^± generating only semigroups, or satisfying a Hille-Yosida-type condition without explicit group structure) could still yield a usable resolvent characterization is a natur
  • The restriction to commuting leading-order operators A0, B0 is essential for the clean factorization. PDE models where the principal parts of A and B genuinely fail to commute — for instance, anisotropic damping on non-flat geometries — would require a different decomposition strategy or a perturbative argument that does not rely on exact commutativity.
  • The generalized cosine C_{A,B}(t) acts from dom(B) to X rather than from X to X, a structural difference from the undamped case. This suggests that the natural 'state space' for the damped equation is genuinely smaller, and solution operators cannot be extended to all of X without additional assumptions on B — a constraint that could matter for control-theoretic applications.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper studies the abstract damped wave equation u'' + 2Bu' = Au on a Banach space X, allowing the damping operator B to be unbounded. The main results are: (1) Under Hypothesis (HAB), the block operator G = [[-B, I], [A+B^2, -B]] generates a C0-group on dom(A0) × X (Theorem 2.3), proved via the decomposition G = G0 + V0 where G0 is explicitly treated in Lemma 2.1 using the factorization of the quadratic pencil Q0(λ), and V0 is bounded; (2) Under Hypothesis (ABY), existence and uniqueness of classical and Laplace transform mild solutions (Theorems 3.6, 3.9), with generalized cosine and sine families C_{A,B}(t) and S_{A,B}(t) defined in (3.54)-(3.55); (3) Equivalence of Laplace transform and integral mild solution notions (Theorem 4.9); (4) Regularity, invariance, growth estimates, and trigonometric-type identities for these families (Sections 4-5); (5) Concrete PDE examples including cases where damping restores well-posedness that fails in the undamped equation (Section 6). The paper is self-contained and the proofs proceed step-by-step.

Significance. The paper provides a unified framework for damped wave equations on Banach spaces with unbounded damping, extending the classical cosine/sine family theory. The decomposition G = G0 + V0 and the explicit formula for the group generated by G0 (Lemma 2.1) are the key technical innovations, enabling treatment of cases where B is unbounded and where the undamped equation is ill-posed (Example 6.5 with γ ∈ (-1,0)). The equivalence of two mild solution notions (Theorem 4.9) is a substantive contribution that requires the full machinery developed in Sections 3-4. The trigonometric identities (Lemmas 5.7-5.8), derived via the inhomogeneous equation rather than direct computation, are non-trivial generalizations of the undamped case. The examples in Section 6 demonstrate the applicability of the framework to multidimensional and coupled systems. The paper ships falsifiable predictions (e.g., the well-posedness-restoring effect of damping in Example 6.5) and parameter-free structural results under (HAB).

major comments (2)
  1. [Lemma 2.1, proof (group property of T0)] The group property of T0(t) is dismissed as following from 'a long but straightforward computation based on (2.4)-(2.8).' While the skeptic correctly notes that this is not a logical gap—the Hille-Yosida verification via (2.21) and the Laplace transform matching in (2.22) suffice to identify G0 as the generator of the C0-semigroup T0(t), and the extension to R- follows by symmetry—the claim that T0 is a group is used throughout the paper. A brief sentence explaining why T0(-t) is the inverse of T0(t) (e.g., by noting the symmetry A0^+ ↔ A0^- under t ↦ -t in (2.2)) would strengthen the presentation and is load-bearing for the C0-group conclusion.
  2. [Theorem 4.9 (uniqueness of integral mild solutions)] The uniqueness argument constructs w0(t) = ∫_0^t (t-s) v0(s) ds where v0(t) = ∫_0^t (t-s) u0(s) ds, and shows w0 satisfies the homogeneous equation (1.1) with zero data, concluding w0 ≡ 0 by Theorem 3.6. This requires w0 to be a classical solution in the sense of Definition 3.4, i.e., w0 ∈ C^2(R,X), w0(t) ∈ dom(A), w0'(t) ∈ dom(B), and Aw0(·) ∈ C(R,X). The paper establishes w0 ∈ C^2(R, dom(A)) in (4.89), which covers the first three conditions. However, the verification that Bw0'(·) ∈ C(R,X) (needed for w0' to be in dom(B) continuously) is only implicit: it follows from (4.90) where Bw0'(t) appears as part of the computation, but the continuity of Bw0'(·) is not separately justified. Since w0 ∈ C^2(R, dom(A)) and B|_{dom(A)} ∈ B(dom(A), Y) by (3.2), this is immediate, but a one-line remark would close the gap explicitly.
minor comments (8)
  1. [p. 2, Hypothesis (HAB)(v)] The commutator condition B0B1 - B1B0 = B̃1 on dom(A0^2) is stated without motivation at this point. A forward reference to the examples in Section 6 (where it is verified for multiplication operators) would help the reader.
  2. [p. 6, equation (2.6)] The intermediate step e^{(t-τ)A0^+} e^{τA0^-} = e^{tA0^+} e^{-2τA0} uses (2.5) and commutativity, but the simplification e^{-tB0} e^{tA0} = e^{tA0^+} is not spelled out. Adding one line would aid readability.
  3. [Figure 1 (p. 5)] The figure is referenced before the relevant results are proved. Consider adding a forward reference noting that the diagram summarizes results from Lemmas 4.1-4.3.
  4. [p. 15, Definition 3.10] The definition of C_{A,B} and S_{A,B} via mild solutions of (3.52)-(3.53) is elegant, but it would help to state explicitly that C_{A,B}(0) = I_{dom(B)} and S_{A,B}(0) = 0, S'_{A,B}(0) = I, as these are used later (e.g., in Lemma 4.2(iv) and Lemma 4.7).
  5. [p. 28, equation (5.19)] The identity (S_{A,B} * g)(-·) = -S_{A,B}(-·) * g(-·) is stated without proof. While elementary, a brief verification would be appropriate given its role in (5.20) and Theorem 5.5(iii).
  6. [Section 6, Example 6.5] The interesting claim that damping restores well-posedness for γ ∈ (-1,0) deserves a sentence explaining why A = γ∂²ξ + ... fails to generate a cosine family in this regime (e.g., the spectral condition fails).
  7. [References] Reference [21] is cited as 'preprint' (the authors' own forthcoming work on uniqueness of the phase space). If available by the time of publication, a more complete reference would be appropriate.
  8. [Notation] The notation C^{-ν}(R, X) is defined on p. 2 but M^{-ν}(R, X) is defined on p. 26. Using consistent placement or a unified notation table would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and for the two constructive suggestions, both of which are well-taken. We will address each in a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Lemma 2.1, proof (group property of T0)] The group property of T0(t) is dismissed as following from 'a long but straightforward computation based on (2.4)-(2.8).' ... A brief sentence explaining why T0(-t) is the inverse of T0(t) (e.g., by noting the symmetry A0+ ↔ A0- under t ↦ -t in (2.2)) would strengthen the presentation and is load-bearing for the C0-group conclusion.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that a brief justification is warranted. The key observation is that replacing t by -t in (2.2) interchanges the roles of A0+ and A0- in the exponential terms, while the integral term transforms via a change of variables s ↦ -s into the negative of the original integral. Concretely, from (2.5) we have e^{tA0±} = e^{tA0}e^{∓tB0}, so that e^{(-t)A0+} = e^{-tA0}e^{tB0} and e^{(-t)A0-} = e^{tA0}e^{tB0}. Using the commutation relations (2.4)–(2.5), one verifies that each block of T0(-t) equals the corresponding block of T0(t)^{-1}. We will add a sentence to this effect in the proof of Lemma 2.1, immediately after the current statement about the group property. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Theorem 4.9 (uniqueness of integral mild solutions)] ... the verification that Bw0'(·) ∈ C(R,X) (needed for w0' to be in dom(B) continuously) is only implicit: it follows from (4.90) where Bw0'(t) appears as part of the computation, but the continuity of Bw0'(·) is not separately justified. Since w0 ∈ C^2(R, dom(A)) and B|_{dom(A)} ∈ B(dom(A), Y) by (3.2), this is immediate, but a one-line remark would close the gap explicitly.

    Authors: The referee is correct. In the proof of Theorem 4.9, we establish w0 ∈ C^2(R, dom(A)) in (4.89), which means w0'(·) ∈ C(R, dom(A)). Since B|_{dom(A)} ∈ B(dom(A), Y) by (3.2) (and hence B|_{dom(A)} ∈ B(dom(A), X) by the continuous embedding Y ↪ X), it follows immediately that Bw0'(·) ∈ C(R, X). This ensures that w0 satisfies all conditions of Definition 3.4 for a classical solution. We will add a one-line remark at the appropriate point in the proof (after (4.89) and before the application of Theorem 3.6) to make this explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found; the derivation chain is self-contained and genuine.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain proceeds as follows: (1) Hypothesis (HAB) imposes structural conditions on operators A and B (commutativity of leading terms A0, B0; A0^± = ±A0 - B0 generate C0-groups; bounded perturbation structure). (2) Lemma 2.1 proves G0 generates a C0-group using the factorization Q0(λ) = (λI - A0^+)(λI - A0^-) in (2.13), computing the resolvent explicitly in (2.21) and matching via Laplace transform in (2.22). This is a standard Hille-Yosida argument, not circular. (3) Theorem 2.3 decomposes G = G0 + V0 with V0 bounded (2.26), applying the bounded perturbation theorem — again standard, not circular. (4) Under Hypothesis (ABY), which explicitly postulates that G generates a C0-group, the paper constructs generalized cosine/sine families via (3.54)-(3.55) and proves existence/uniqueness of solutions. The paper is transparent that (ABY) is essentially a well-posedness assumption: 'Hypothesis (ABY) can be seen as a reformulation of well-posedness of (1.1).' The genuine content is Theorem 2.3 showing (HAB) → (ABY), which does not assume the conclusion. The equivalence of the two mild solution notions (Theorem 4.9) requires substantial independent work. The only self-citation to forthcoming work [21] (uniqueness of phase space) is explicitly flagged as future work and is not load-bearing for any result in this paper. No step reduces to its inputs by construction; no prediction is a renamed fit; no central premise rests on an unverified self-citation chain. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks (concrete PDE examples in Section 6 verify (HAB) case-by-case). Score: 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or ad-hoc axioms. The hypotheses are structural conditions on operators A and B, standard in the context of PDE models. The invented entities (generalized cosine/sine families) are constructed from the C0-group T(t) and are not postulated independently; their properties are derived, not assumed.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Hypothesis (HAB)(i): A0 B0 = B0 A0 (leading order terms commute)
    Invoked in Lemma 2.1 to factor the pencil Q0(λ) and derive the explicit group formula (2.2).
  • domain assumption Hypothesis (HAB)(iii): A0^± := ±A0 - B0 generate C0-groups on X
    Invoked in Lemma 2.1 to ensure the explicit formula (2.2) for T0(t) defines a C0-group and to establish the resolvent set of G0.
  • domain assumption Hypothesis (HAB)(v): B0 B1 - B1 B0 = B1_tilde
    Invoked in Theorem 2.3 to decompose G = G0 + V0 with V0 bounded, ensuring G generates a C0-group.
  • standard math Standard semigroup theory: bounded perturbations of C0-group generators are C0-group generators
    Invoked in Theorem 2.3 to conclude G generates a C0-group from G0 generating one and V0 being bounded.
invented entities (2)
  • Generalized cosine family C_A,B(t) independent evidence
    purpose: Represents the solution operator for the damped wave equation with initial displacement x and zero initial velocity.
    Defined via Laplace transform of the C0-group T(t) in (3.54). Its properties are derived from T(t) and verified against the PDE in Section 6.
  • Generalized sine family S_A,B(t) independent evidence
    purpose: Represents the solution operator for the damped wave equation with zero initial displacement and initial velocity y.
    Defined as the (1,2) block of the C0-group T(t) in (3.55). Its properties are derived from T(t) and verified against the PDE in Section 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Damped Waves Equation and generalized Cosine and Sine families on Banach spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SB6SJ4NH

@misc{pith2026260705856,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Damped Waves Equation and generalized Cosine and Sine families on Banach spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SB6SJ4NH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05856}
}
abstract

We study the abstract damped wave equation on a Banach space, allowing the damping coefficient to be unbounded. By recasting the equation as a first-order system and identifying conditions under which the associated block operator generates a $C_0$-group, we construct generalized cosine and sine families that represent mild and classical solutions, extending the classical undamped theory. We establish existence, uniqueness, regularity, invariant subspaces, growth rate, and trigonometric type identities for these families. Our setup applies to a broad class of damped wave, Klein--Gordon, and higher-order PDE examples, including cases where damping restores well-posedness that fails in the undamped equation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05856 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A detailed representation of the action of generalized cosine and sine families and their derivatives on the sequences of spaces from (1.9). The generalized cosine and sine functions and their first order derivatives (in the strong sense) are exponentially bounded in various norms, c.f. Lemma 4.6. In addition, these operator valued functions maintain their exponential boundedness when multiplied by A or B. While som… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Anantharaman, M

    N. Anantharaman, M. Leautaud,Sharp polynomial decay rates for the damped wave equation on the torus, Analysis and PDE,7(2014), No.1, pp159-214

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Arendt, C.J.K

    W. Arendt, C.J.K. Batty, M. Hieber, F. Neubrander, Vector-Valued Laplace Transforms and Cauchy Problems, Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2001

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    N. V. Artamonov,Estimate of the decay exponent of an operator semigroup associated with a second-order linear differential equation, Math. Notes,91(2012), no. 5–6, 615–621

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    T. A. Bui, T. Q. Bui, X. T. Duong,Decay estimates for the structural damped wave equations on Heisenberg groups, Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applications NoDEA, vol. 32 (2025), no. 5, Paper No. 84, 34 pp

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    N. Burq, M. Hitrik,Energy decay for damped wave equations on partially rectangular domains, Math. Res. Lett. 14(2007), no. 1, 35-47

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    G. Chen, D. L. Russel,A mathematical model for linear elastic systems with structural damping, Quarterly Applied Math., January 1982, 433-454

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    S. Chen, R. Triggiani,Proof of extensions of two conjectures on structural damping for elastic systems, Pacific J. Math.136(1989), vol. 1, 15–55

    work page 1989

  8. [8]

    S. Chen, R. Triggiani,Characterization of domains of fractional powers of certain operators arising in elastic systems, and applications, J. Diff. Eq.,88(1990), vol 2, 279–293

    work page 1990

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    Chill, D

    R. Chill, D. Seifert, Y. Tomilov,Semi-uniform stability of operator semigroups and energy decay of damped waves, Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.378(2020), (2185): 20190614

    2020

  2. [10]

    Chill, L

    R. Chill, L. Paunonen, D. Seifert, R. Stahn, Y. Tomilov,Nonuniform stability of damped contraction semigroups, Analysis and PDE, Vol.16(2023), No. 5, pp. 1089-1132

    2023

  3. [11]

    Cox and E

    S. Cox and E. Zuazua,The rate at which energy decays in a damped String, Comm. Partial Diff. Eq.,19(1994) (1-2), 213–243

    1994

  4. [12]

    L. H. Fatori, M. Z. Garay, J. E. Z. RiveraDifferentiability, analyticity and optimal rates of decay for damped wave equations, Elec. J. Diff. Eq.,2012(2012), No. 48, pp. 1–13

    2012

  5. [13]

    H. O. Fattorini, Second Order Linear Differential Equations in Banach spaces, North-Holland, Mathematics Studies,108, 1991

    1991

  6. [14]

    Freitas, P

    P. Freitas, P. Siegl, C. Tretter,The damped wave equation with unbounded damping, J. Diff. Eq.,264(2018), 7023–7054

    2018

  7. [15]

    Gesztesy, H

    F. Gesztesy, H. Holden,The damped string problem revisited, J. Diff. Eq.251(2011), 1086–1127

    2011

  8. [16]

    Ikehata and H

    R. Ikehata and H. Takeda,Asymptotic profiles of solutions for structural damped wave equations, J. of Dyn. Diff. Eq.31(2019), 537–571

    2019

  9. [17]

    Ikehata and H

    R. Ikehata and H. Takeda, Uniform energy decay for wave equations with unbounded damping coefficients, Funkcial. Ekvac.63(2020), no. 1, 133–152

    2020

  10. [18]

    Ikehata, G

    R. Ikehata, G. Todorova, B. Yordanov,Wave equations with strong damping in Hilbert spaces, J. Diff. Eq., 254(2013), 3352–3368

    2013

  11. [19]

    Kr´ ol,Resolvent characterization of generators of cosine functions andC 0-groups, J

    S. Kr´ ol,Resolvent characterization of generators of cosine functions andC 0-groups, J. Evol. Eq.,13(2013), 281–309

    2013

  12. [20]

    Kr´ ol, Y

    S. Kr´ ol, Y. Latushkin and Y. Tomilov,Diffusion phenomena via multipliers, 2026, preprint

    2026

  13. [21]

    Latushkin, A

    Y. Latushkin, A. Pogan,Well-posedness of the abstract damped wave equation and the first order system, preprint

  14. [22]

    Leautaud,Long time energy averages and a lower resolvent estimate for damped waves, preprint, arXiv:2309.12709v1

    M. Leautaud,Long time energy averages and a lower resolvent estimate for damped waves, preprint, arXiv:2309.12709v1

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Malhi and M

    S. Malhi and M. Stanislavova,On the energy decay rates for the 1D damped fractional Klein–Gordon equation, Math. Nachr.293(2020), 363–375

    2020

  16. [24]

    Neubrander,Integrated semigroups and their applications to abstract Cauchy problems, Pacific J

    F. Neubrander,Integrated semigroups and their applications to abstract Cauchy problems, Pacific J. Math.135 (1988), No. 1, 111–155

    1988

  17. [25]

    Orive, E

    R. Orive, E. Zuazua, A. F. Pazoto,Asymptotic expansion for damped wave equations with periodic coefficients, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.11(2001), 1285–1310

    2001

  18. [26]

    Sobajima,Higher order asymptotic expansion of solutions to abstract linear hyperbolic equations, Math

    M. Sobajima,Higher order asymptotic expansion of solutions to abstract linear hyperbolic equations, Math. Ann. 380(2021), no. 1–2, 515–545

    2021

  19. [27]

    Sogge, Fourier Integrals in Classical Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 1993,105

    C. Sogge, Fourier Integrals in Classical Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 1993,105. 40

    1993

  20. [28]

    Stein, Harmonic Analysis: Real-Variable Methods, Orthogonality, and Oscillatory Integrals, Princeton Uni- versity Press 1993

    E. Stein, Harmonic Analysis: Real-Variable Methods, Orthogonality, and Oscillatory Integrals, Princeton Uni- versity Press 1993

    1993

  21. [29]

    Taylor, Pseudo-differential Operators and Nonlinear PDE, Birkhauser, 1991

    M. Taylor, Pseudo-differential Operators and Nonlinear PDE, Birkhauser, 1991

    1991

  22. [30]

    T. Xiao, J. Liang,Differential operators and C-wellposedness of complete second order abstract Cauchy problems, Pacific J. Math.186(1998), No. 1, 167–200

    1998

  23. [31]

    T. Xiao, J. Liang,Higher Order Abstract Cauchy Problems: Their Existence and Uniqueness Families, J. London Math. Soc.,67(2003), 149–164

    2003

  24. [32]

    1701, 1998

    The Cauchy Problem for Higher Order Abstract Differential Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 1701, 1998. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 Email address:latushkiny@missouri.edu Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 Email address:pogana@miamioh.edu 41

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed July 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.