Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 64 references

Design and Deployment Guidelines for UAV-Mounted RIS Under Position Uncertainty

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Phase noise kills coherent RIS gain exponentially, with a log-scaling survival bound

desk verdict Solid engineering framework for UAV-RIS coherence loss, but the element-independence assumption needs scrutiny read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07298 v1 pith:6RMZWIS3 submitted 2026-07-08 eess.SP cs.SYeess.SY

Kevin Weinberger , David Müller , Martin Mönnigmann , Aydin Sezgin This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SPcs.SYeess.SY
keywords uncertaintychannelcoherenceuav-mountedphasepropagationresultscapturing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tackles a practical problem: when a reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) is mounted on a drone (UAV), the drone's position wobbles due to wind and sensor noise. That wobble corrupts the precise phase alignment that makes an RIS effective. The authors build a framework that traces how physical position uncertainty propagates through geometry into the complex-valued wireless channel. The central finding is that phase uncertainty does not degrade performance gently; it causes an exponential collapse of channel coherence, governed by the factor e^{-u^2(P)/2}, where u^2(P) is the phase variance. This exponential attenuation means that once phase noise crosses a critical level, the RIS stops behaving as a coherent array and degrades toward incoherent noise. To make this transition actionable, the authors derive a performance-driven coherence threshold (PCT): a closed-form bound u^2(P) <= -ln((eta_0 - 1/M)/(1 - 1/M)) that tells you, for a given array size M and a tolerable performance loss eta_0, the maximum phase variance the system can survive. They validate this threshold against both analytical scaling laws and Monte Carlo simulations seeded by real drone flight data, showing it accurately captures the coherence boundary, especially for large arrays. They then use the validated threshold to map out where a drone-mounted RIS should physically fly. The counterintuitive result is that the conventional wisdom of placing the RIS near the transmitter or receiver, or at the midpoint, breaks down under realistic uncertainty. At certain heights and frequencies, off-center positions become preferable because they trade a slightly longer path for reduced sensitivity to position errors.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is a two-stage propagation chain. First, the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) framework propagates UAV position uncertainty through the Euclidean distance functions d_h and d_g into amplitude and phase uncertainties u^2(A_m) and u^2(P_m), including covariance terms between the Tx-RIS and RIS-Rx distances. Second, the phase uncertainty is modeled as Gaussian and passed through the complex exponential e^{jP_m}, where the characteristic function identity E[e^{jP}] = e^{j mu} e^{-u^2/2} yields the exponential coherence loss. The expected received power then decomposes into a coherent term scaling as M^2 e^{-u^2(P)} and an incoherent term scaling as M(

What would settle it

The exponential coherence loss formula E[e^{jP_m}] = e^{j mu_Pm} e^{-u^2(P_m)/2} holds if and only if P_m is Gaussian. If empirical phase distributions from real UAV flights deviate significantly from Gaussian (e.g., heavy-tailed or multimodal), the characteristic function would differ and the PCT boundary would shift, potentially invalidating the deployment guidelines.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central object is the exponential coherence attenuation factor e^{-u^2(P)/2}, which arises when Gaussian-distributed phase uncertainty P is passed through the complex exponential e^{jP} via the characteristic function of a Gaussian. This factor converts a linear-ish geometric perturbation into an exponential loss of coherent gain. From this, the authors derive the performance-driven coherence threshold (PCT), a closed-form inequality that separates the regime where the RIS array coherently combines signals (gain scales as M^2) from the regime where it collapses toward incoherent combining (gain scales as M). The PCT depends only on the number of elements M and the target fraction

Load-bearing premise

The stochastic model assumes that the propagated phase P_m is Gaussian distributed, which is what yields the clean exponential attenuation factor. The GUM framework propagates first- and second-order moments through the nonlinear distance function, but the Gaussian assumption on the resulting phase is not independently validated against the measurement data. If the true phase distribution has heavy tails or is skewed, the exponential attenuation factor and all downstream

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The exponential coherence loss means that RIS arrays cannot simply grow their way out of positioning error; the tolerable phase variance scales only logarithmically with array size M, so doubling the surface area buys very little additional robustness.
  • The PCT provides a deployment-time go/no-go test: given a drone's measured position uncertainty and a desired performance floor, one can immediately determine whether coherent RIS operation is even feasible at a given frequency and array size, before any flight.
  • The finding that off-center placement can outperform midpoint placement under uncertainty suggests that drone-RIS path planning should jointly optimize geometry and uncertainty sensitivity, not just path loss.
  • Lower carrier frequencies enlarge the feasible deployment region because phase sensitivity is proportional to 2*pi/lambda; this implies a fundamental frequency-versus-robustness tradeoff for RIS-assisted links.
  • The decomposition into coherent and incoherent power terms provides a natural bound on achievable rate and SNR for any RIS system operating under position uncertainty, which could be folded into link-budget analysis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript develops a GUM-based uncertainty propagation framework for UAV-mounted RIS channels, mapping UAV position uncertainty through the geometric Tx-RIS-Rx model into the complex cascaded channel. The authors derive a closed-form stochastic model showing that phase uncertainty induces exponential coherence loss via the factor e^{-u^2(P)/2}, and introduce a performance-driven coherence threshold (PCT) that defines the boundary between coherent and incoherent combining. The PCT is validated against analytical scaling laws and measurement-informed Monte Carlo simulations, and is then used to derive deployment guidelines showing that optimal UAV-RIS placement deviates from conventional midpoint intuition under realistic positioning uncertainty.

Significance. The paper addresses a practically important problem: how UAV positioning errors degrade RIS coherent combining. The derivation of the exponential coherence loss factor from the characteristic function of a Gaussian phase variable is clean and provides an interpretable, falsifiable design metric (the PCT in Eq. 36). The use of real EKF-based measurement data (Table I) from a physical UAV-RIS prototype (Fig. 1) to parameterize the uncertainty model is a genuine strength. The deployment analysis in Fig. 4, showing that off-center placement can outperform midpoint positioning under uncertainty, is a non-trivial and practically useful finding.

major comments (2)
  1. Section IV.D, Eq. (26): The variance of the effective channel is derived as u^2(h_eff) = Σ_m u^2(h_eff_m), which explicitly assumes statistical independence between reflecting elements. However, all M elements share the same UAV position error p_UAV (Eq. 5), meaning their phase perturbations P_m = (2π/λ)(d_h^m + d_g^m) are driven by a common random variable. For a rigid RIS panel of 0.20m × 0.16m at propagation distances of several meters, the sensitivity coefficients c_{d_h^m}^q (Eq. 7) are nearly identical across elements, so phase perturbations would be strongly positively correlated. Under positive correlation, the true variance includes cross-covariance terms Σ_{m≠n} Cov(h_eff_m, h_eff_n) that grow as M(M-1), potentially making the incoherent term scale faster than M. This would shift the coherence boundary and make the PCT in Eq. (36) too permissive. The Monte Carlo validation (Fig
  2. Section IV.C, Eqs. (13)-(14): The stochastic model assumes that the propagated phase P_m is Gaussian distributed, which is used to obtain the characteristic-function result E[e^{jP_m}] = e^{jμ_Pm} e^{-u^2(P_m)/2} in Eq. (15). The GUM framework propagates first- and second-order moments through a nonlinear distance function, but the Gaussian assumption on the resulting phase is not independently validated against the measurement data. If the true phase distribution has heavy tails or is skewed, the exponential attenuation factor and all downstream threshold results would change. A Q-Q plot or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of the propagated phase against a Gaussian, using the measurement data from [8], would establish whether this approximation is valid.
minor comments (6)
  1. Section V.A, Eq. (33): The condition u^2(P) ≲ ln(M) is stated as ensuring feasibility of coherent scaling, but the transition from the exact finite-M expression (Eq. 32) to this asymptotic condition is not shown step-by-step. A brief derivation or intermediate expression would help the reader verify the scaling.
  2. Section VI.B, Fig. 4: The feasible deployment regions are evaluated for carrier frequencies between 0.075 GHz and 0.2 GHz, but the experimental setup described in Section VI uses ν = 5.376 GHz. The reader is left wondering whether the deployment guidelines are applicable at the actual operating frequency of the hardware or only at the lower frequencies shown.
  3. Section VI.A, Fig. 3: The caption references 'Eq (38)' but no equation (38) appears in the manuscript. The equation being plotted appears to be Eq. (37).
  4. Section III.B, Table I: The bias values q̄_e^UAV (e.g., -0.61 m in z) are substantial relative to the standard uncertainties u(q_UAV) ≈ 0.4 m. The text does not discuss whether this bias is corrected in the downstream analysis or treated as part of the uncertainty. Clarification would help the reader understand the operating condition.
  5. The abstract states that realistic positioning conditions 'significantly deviate from the conventional RIS intuition, which typically favors placement close to either the transmitter or receiver.' However, the deployment analysis in Section VI.B concludes that midpoint placement is generally favorable, with off-center placement becoming favorable only at increased heights. The abstract could be more precise about the conditions under which deviation occurs.
  6. Reference [8] is cited as the source of the measurement data and uncertainty parameters but is listed as a 2025 ICCAS paper. If this reference is not yet available at the time of publication, the key uncertainty parameters should be restated in the manuscript for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The key steps are: (1) GUM-based moment propagation from UAV position uncertainty to distance uncertainties (Eqs. 7-9), which uses standard sensitivity coefficients; (2) propagation to amplitude/phase uncertainties (Eqs. 11-12), again standard GUM; (3) the Gaussian assumption on phase (Eq. 14) yields the characteristic-function result E[e^{jP_m}] = e^{jμ_Pm}e^{-u²(P_m)/2} (Eq. 15), which is a standard mathematical identity, not a fitted or self-defined relation; (4) the expected power decomposition (Eq. 30) and the PCT (Eq. 36) are derived algebraically from Eq. 32, which itself follows from the stochastic model. The PCT formula is parameter-free given the uncertainty inputs and is not defined in terms of the quantity it predicts. The self-citations ([8], [11]) provide measurement data (uncertainty parameters in Table I) and a prior linearized framework, but the central result—the PCT and the exponential coherence loss—is derived independently from the stochastic model and validated against Monte Carlo simulations that propagate through the full nonlinear geometric model. The Monte Carlo validation uses the same uncertainty parameters but does not assume the PCT result, so it constitutes genuine validation rather than circular confirmation. The skeptic's concern about the element-independence assumption (Eq. 26) is a modeling correctness issue, not a circularity issue—the assumption may be physically questionable, but it is not self-definitional.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or forces. The PCT is a derived metric, not an invented entity. The free parameters are either design choices (eta_0) or measured inputs (uncertainty values). The main axioms are distributional and independence assumptions that simplify the propagation framework.

free parameters (2)
  • eta_0 (performance threshold) = 0.5 (-3 dB)
    Chosen as the target fraction of ideal coherent gain; set to 0.5 for the -3 dB case in the numerical evaluation. Not fitted to data but selected as a design parameter.
  • u^2(q) position uncertainty (x, y, z) = 0.004, 0.004, 0.004 m (standard uncertainty); 0.40, 0.40, 0.38 m (expanded)
    Derived from empirical EKF vs. motion capture comparison in [8], Table I. These are measured inputs, not fitted model parameters.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The propagated phase P_m is Gaussian distributed: P_m ~ N(mu_Pm, u^2(P_m))
    Invoked in Eq. 14 to enable the characteristic function evaluation in Eq. 15. The GUM framework propagates moments, but the Gaussian distributional assumption is an additional step not guaranteed by GUM alone.
  • domain assumption Reflecting elements are statistically independent
    Invoked in Section IV.D (between Eqs. 24-26) to reduce the GUM covariance propagation to a simple summation of individual contributions.
  • domain assumption UAV rotates only around its center of gravity
    Invoked in Eq. 5 to express element position as p_UAV + R*r_m. Simplifies the geometric model.
  • domain assumption Position components q in {x, y, z} are mutually independent
    Invoked in Eq. 9 to simplify the covariance propagation. The EKF may produce correlated estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Design and Deployment Guidelines for UAV-Mounted RIS Under Position Uncertainty." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6RMZWIS3

@misc{pith2026260707298,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Design and Deployment Guidelines for UAV-Mounted RIS Under Position Uncertainty},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6RMZWIS3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07298}
}
read the original abstract

UAV-mounted reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) are a promising enabler for 6G networks, offering dynamic control of wireless propagation for coverage enhancement, integrated sensing and communication (ISAC), and localization. By exploiting UAV mobility, RIS can maintain favorable line-of-sight links, improving channel quality in dynamic environments. However, UAV positioning uncertainties introduce channel distortions that degrade RIS phase alignment and coherent combining. This work develops a GUM-based uncertainty propagation framework for UAV-mounted RIS channels, mapping UAV position uncertainty through the geometric Tx-RIS-Rx model into the complex cascaded channel. We derive a closed-form stochastic propagation model capturing nonlinear phase uncertainty effects and quantify their impact on channel coherence. The results show that phase uncertainty induces exponential coherence loss, dominating performance degradation. To characterize this transition, we introduce a performance-driven coherence threshold (PCT) that defines the boundary where incoherent combining results in a predetermined performance loss. Results based on analytical scaling laws and Monte Carlo simulations confirm the tightness of the PCT in accurately capturing the coherence transition. This validated threshold is then leveraged to derive optimal UAV-mounted RIS placement, revealing that realistic positioning conditions significantly deviate from the conventional RIS intuition, which typically favors placement close to either the transmitter or receiver.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07298 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Customized Holybro X500 featuring a mounted RIS pro￾totype, controlled by a Raspberry Pi 4B, and Herelink 1.1 controller. However, mounting an RIS on a UAV exposes the system to both external and internal sources of uncertainty, such as wind disturbances and sensor noise, which result in orientation [7] and position errors [8]. These directly affect Tx–RIS–Rx alignment and degrade phase-coherent combining, since RIS… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the EKF-estimated cascaded channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. −3 dB coherence bound (37) (red solid) and actual threshold (purple dashed): scaling-law-based analytical results (32) (left) and UAV-distribution-based Monte Carlo results (right), shown over phase uncertainty u 2 (Pm) and number of RIS elements M. VI. NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS For the analytical and measurement-based evaluation, the RIS prototype dimensions and UAV mounting configuration from the experim… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of UAV-mounted RIS’s feasible deployment area in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [8]

    Angle-Dependent Phase Shifter Model for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: Does the Angle-Reciprocity Hold? , year=

    Chen, Weicong and Bai, Lin and Tang, Wankai and Jin, Shi and Jiang, Wei Xiang and Cui, Tie Jun , journal=. Angle-Dependent Phase Shifter Model for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: Does the Angle-Reciprocity Hold? , year=

    work page

  2. [1]

    Digitally Tunable Frequency Selective Surface for a Physical Layer Security System in the 5 GHz

    Heinrichs, Markus and Kronberger, Rainer , booktitle=. Digitally Tunable Frequency Selective Surface for a Physical Layer Security System in the 5 GHz. 2021 , volume=

    work page 2021

  3. [2]

    Wireless Communications Through Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces , year=

    Basar, Ertugrul and Di Renzo, Marco and De Rosny, Julien and Debbah, Merouane and Alouini, Mohamed-Slim and Zhang, Rui , journal=. Wireless Communications Through Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces , year=

    work page

  4. [3]

    and Basar, Ertugrul and Huang, Chongwen and Liu, Ruiqi and Liu, Yuanwei and Yuen, Chau , journal=

    Jian, Mengnan and Alexandropoulos, George C. and Basar, Ertugrul and Huang, Chongwen and Liu, Ruiqi and Liu, Yuanwei and Yuen, Chau , journal=. Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for wireless communications: Overview of hardware designs, channel models, and estimation techniques , year=

    work page

  5. [4]

    2022 , volume=

    Tewes, Simon and Heinrichs, Markus and Kronberger, Rainer and Sezgin, Aydin , journal=. 2022 , volume=

    work page 2022

  6. [5]

    2023 , issn =

    ICT Express , volume =. 2023 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2023.03.004 , author =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icte.2023.03.004 2023

  7. [6]

    Synergistic Benefits in

    Weinberger, Kevin and Ahmad, Alaa Alameer and Sezgin, Aydin and Zappone, Alessio , journal=. Synergistic Benefits in. 2022 , volume=

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    On the Optimal Number of Reflecting Elements for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces , year=

    Zappone, Alessio and Di Renzo, Marco and Xi, Xiaojun and Debbah, Merouane , journal=. On the Optimal Number of Reflecting Elements for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces , year=

    work page

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Metrologia , volume=

    On the propagation of uncertainty in complex-valued quantities , author=. Metrologia , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  2. [10]

    Treatment of uncertainties in precision measurements , year=

    Weise, Klaus , journal=. Treatment of uncertainties in precision measurements , year=

  3. [11]

    Evaluation of measurement data ---

    BIPM and IEC and IFCC and ILAC and ISO and IUPAC and IUPAP and OIML , journal=. Evaluation of measurement data ---. ,

  4. [12]

    2021 , volume=

    Mursia, Placido and Devoti, Francesco and Sciancalepore, Vincenzo and Costa-Pérez, Xavier , journal=. 2021 , volume=

    2021

  5. [13]

    and Huang, Chao and Ni, Wei , journal=

    Savkin, Andrey V. and Huang, Chao and Ni, Wei , journal=. Joint Multi-. 2023 , volume=

    2023

  6. [14]

    2005 , publisher=

    Fundamentals of wireless communication , author=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  7. [15]

    IEEE Wireless Commun

    Intelligent reflecting surface versus decode-and-forward: How large surfaces are needed to beat relaying? , author=. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  8. [16]

    Strinati, Emilio Calvanese and Alexandropoulos, George C. and Wymeersch, Henk and Denis, Benoît and Sciancalepore, Vincenzo and D'Errico, Raffaele and Clemente, Antonio and Phan-Huy, Dinh-Thuy and De Carvalho, Elisabeth and Popovski, Petar , journal=. Reconfigurable, Intellige...

    2021

  9. [17]

    The Emergence of Multi-Functional and Hybrid Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Integrated Sensing and Communications - A Survey ,

    Tishchenko, Anton and Khalily, Mohsen and Shojaeifard, Arman and Burton, Fraser and Björnson, Emil and Di Renzo, Marco and Tafazolli, Rahim ,. The Emergence of Multi-Functional and Hybrid Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Integrated Sensing and Communications - A Survey ,

  10. [18]

    2022 , volume=

    Pogaku, Arjun Chakravarthi and Do, Dinh-Thuan and Lee, Byung Moo and Nguyen, Nhan Duc , journal=. 2022 , volume=

    2022

  11. [19]

    and Larsson, Erik G

    Wang, Cheng-Xiang and You, Xiaohu and Gao, Xiqi and Zhu, Xiuming and Li, Zixin and Zhang, Chuan and Wang, Haiming and Huang, Yongming and Chen, Yunfei and Haas, Harald and Thompson, John S. and Larsson, Erik G. and Renzo, Marco Di and Tong, Wen and Zhu, Peiying and Shen, Xuemi...

    2023

  12. [20]

    2025 , eprint=

    When Every Symbol Counts: Resilient Wireless Systems Under Finite Blocklength Constraints , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  13. [21]

    2024 , volume=

    Weinberger, Kevin and Tewes, Simon and Sezgin, Aydin , booktitle=ISWCS, title=. 2024 , volume=

    2024

  14. [22]

    and Rodríguez-Piñeiro, J

    Xue, K. and Rodríguez-Piñeiro, J. and Yu, Y. and Hong, J. and Yin, X. and Shunqin, X. , booktitle=. Modelling, simulation and implementation of a quadrotor UAV , year=

  15. [23]

    Uncertainty Propagation and Minimization for Channel Estimation in UAV-Mounted RIS Systems , year=

    Weinberger, Kevin and Müller, David and Mönnigmann, Martin and Sezgin, Aydin , booktitle=. Uncertainty Propagation and Minimization for Channel Estimation in UAV-Mounted RIS Systems , year=

  16. [24]

    and Hafez, I

    Safwat, N. and Hafez, I. and Newagy, F. , booktitle=. Air-To-Air Channel Model For. 2021 , volume=

    2021

  17. [25]

    Uncertainty Propagation and Minimization for Channel Estimation in

    Weinberger, Kevin and Müller, David and Mönnigmann, Martin and Sezgin, Aydin , booktitle=. Uncertainty Propagation and Minimization for Channel Estimation in. 2025 , volume=

    2025

  18. [26]

    The Impact of

    Müller, David and Weinberger, Kevin and Sezgin, Aydin and Mönnigmann, Martin , booktitle=. The Impact of. 2025 , volume=

    2025

  19. [27]

    Open Source Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface for the Frequency Range of 5

    Heinrichs, Markus and Sezgin, Aydin and Kronberger, Rainer , booktitle=. Open Source Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface for the Frequency Range of 5. 2023 , volume=

    2023

  20. [28]

    2023 , volume=

    Weinberger, Kevin and Tewes, Simon and Heinrichs, Markus and Kronberger, Rainer and Sezgin, Aydin , booktitle=. 2023 , volume=

    2023

  21. [29]

    Metrologia ,

    B D Hall ,. Metrologia ,. 2004 ,. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/41/3/010 ,

    2004 doi

  22. [30]

    Metrologia , abstract =

    B D Hall , title =. Metrologia , abstract =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/53/1/S25 , url =

    2015 doi

  23. [31]

    Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: Channel Characterization and Modeling , year=

    Huang, Jie and Wang, Cheng-Xiang and Sun, Yingzhuo and Feng, Rui and Huang, Jialing and Guo, Bolun and Zhong, Zhimeng and Cui, Tie Jun , journal=. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: Channel Characterization and Modeling , year=

  24. [32]

    Channel Estimation for

    Wei, Xiuhong and Shen, Decai and Dai, Linglong , journal=. Channel Estimation for. 2021 , volume=

    2021

  25. [33]

    Indoor Localization With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface , year=

    Ma, Teng and Xiao, Yue and Lei, Xia and Xiong, Wenhui and Ding, Yuan , journal=. Indoor Localization With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface , year=

  26. [34]

    2022 , volume=

    Dardari, Davide and Decarli, Nicoló and Guerra, Anna and Guidi, Francesco , journal=. 2022 , volume=

    2022

  27. [35]

    Smart Radio Environments Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: How It Works, State of Research, and The Road Ahead , year=

    Di Renzo, Marco and Zappone, Alessio and Debbah, Merouane and Alouini, Mohamed-Slim and Yuen, Chau and de Rosny, Julien and Tretyakov, Sergei , journal=. Smart Radio Environments Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: How It Works, State of Research, and The Road Ah...

  28. [36]

    Wireless Communications With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface: Path Loss Modeling and Experimental Measurement , year=

    Tang, Wankai and Chen, Ming Zheng and Chen, Xiangyu and Dai, Jun Yan and Han, Yu and Di Renzo, Marco and Zeng, Yong and Jin, Shi and Cheng, Qiang and Cui, Tie Jun , journal=. Wireless Communications With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface: Path Loss Modeling and Experimental M...

  29. [37]

    Lee and You, Xiaohu and Hanzo, Lajos , journal=

    Pan, Cunhua and Ren, Hong and Wang, Kezhi and Kolb, Jonas Florentin and Elkashlan, Maged and Chen, Ming and Di Renzo, Marco and Hao, Yang and Wang, Jiangzhou and Swindlehurst, A. Lee and You, Xiaohu and Hanzo, Lajos , journal=. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for. 2021 , volume=

    2021

  30. [38]

    Assessing

    Müller, David and Weinberger, Kevin and Dyrska, Raphael and Sezgin, Aydin and Mönnigmann, Martin , booktitle=. Assessing. 2024 , volume=

    2024

  31. [39]

    and Phan-Huy, D.-T

    Fara, R. and Phan-Huy, D.-T. and Ratajczak, P. and Ourir, A. and Di Renzo, M. and De Rosny, J. , booktitle=. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Assisted Ambient Backscatter Communications – Experimental Assessment , year=

  32. [40]

    Indoor Coverage Enhancement for

    Kayraklık, Sefa and Yildirim, Ibrahim and Gevez, Yarkın and Basar, Ertugrul and Görçin, Ali , keywords =. Indoor Coverage Enhancement for. 2022 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2211.07188 , url =

    2022 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    , volume=

    Weinberger, Kevin and Reifert, Robert-Jeron and Sezgin, Aydin and Basar, Ertugrul , booktitle=. , volume=

  34. [42]

    Sacrificing

    Weinberger, Kevin and Sezgin, Aydin , booktitle=. Sacrificing. 2022 , volume=

    2022

  35. [43]

    On Synergistic Benefits of Rate Splitting in

    Weinberger, Kevin and Ahmad, Alaa Alameer and Sezgin, Aydin , booktitle=. On Synergistic Benefits of Rate Splitting in. 2021 , volume=

    2021

  36. [44]

    An Improved Path-Loss Model for Reconfigurable-Intelligent-Surface-Aided Wireless Communications and Experimental Validation , year=

    Jeong, Jungi and Oh, Jun Hwa and Lee, Seung Yoon and Park, Yuntae and Wi, Sang-Hyuk , journal=. An Improved Path-Loss Model for Reconfigurable-Intelligent-Surface-Aided Wireless Communications and Experimental Validation , year=

  37. [45]

    Full-Duplex meets Reconfigurable Surfaces:

    Tewes, Simon and Heinrichs, Markus and Staat, Paul and Kronberger, Rainer and Sezgin, Aydin , booktitle=. Full-Duplex meets Reconfigurable Surfaces:. 2022 , volume=

    2022

  38. [46]

    Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces Assisted Communications With Limited Phase Shifts: How Many Phase Shifts Are Enough? , year=

    Zhang, Hongliang and Di, Boya and Song, Lingyang and Han, Zhu , journal=. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces Assisted Communications With Limited Phase Shifts: How Many Phase Shifts Are Enough? , year=

  39. [47]

    2005 , publisher=

    Wireless communications , author=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  40. [48]

    Scientific reports , volume=

    Shaping complex microwave fields in reverberating media with binary tunable metasurfaces , author=. Scientific reports , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  41. [49]

    Open Source Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface for the Frequency Range of 5 GHz WiFi ,. 2023 ,

    2023

  42. [50]

    Accelerating Federated Learning via Momentum Gradient Descent , year=

    Liu, Wei and Chen, Li and Chen, Yunfei and Zhang, Wenyi , journal=. Accelerating Federated Learning via Momentum Gradient Descent , year=

  43. [51]

    A comprehensive dataset of

    Tewes, Simon and Heinrichs, Markus and Weinberger, Kevin and Kronberger, Rainer and Sezgin, Aydin , booktitle=. A comprehensive dataset of. 2023 , volume=

    2023

  44. [52]

    Validating Properties of

    Weinberger, Kevin and Tewes, Simon and Sezgin, Aydin , booktitle=. Validating Properties of. 2024 , volume=

    2024

  45. [53]

    Flying Intelligent Surfaces: Joint Adjustment of Position and Configuration for

    Weinberger, Kevin and Tewes, Simon and Müller, Jens and Dyrska, Raphael and Mönnigmann, Martin and Sezgin, Aydin , booktitle=. Flying Intelligent Surfaces: Joint Adjustment of Position and Configuration for. 2023 , volume=

    2023

  46. [54]

    C.-X. Wang, X. You, X. Gao, X. Zhu, Z. Li, C. Zhang, H. Wang, Y. Huang, Y. Chen, H. Haas, J. S. Thompson, E. G. Larsson, M. D. Renzo, W. Tong, P. Zhu, X. Shen, H. V. Poor, and L. Hanzo, ``On the road to 6G : Visions, requirements, key technologies, and testbeds,'' IEEE Commun....

    2023

  47. [55]

    E. C. Strinati, G. C. Alexandropoulos, H. Wymeersch, B. Denis, V. Sciancalepore, R. D'Errico, A. Clemente, D.-T. Phan-Huy, E. De Carvalho, and P. Popovski, ``Reconfigurable, intelligent, and sustainable wireless environments for 6G smart connectivity,'' IEEE Commun. Mag., vol....

    2021

  48. [56]

    Weinberger and A

    K. Weinberger and A. Sezgin, ``When every symbol counts: Resilient wireless systems under finite blocklength constraints,'' 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21664

    2025 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Weinberger, S

    K. Weinberger, S. Tewes, and A. Sezgin, ``Show me the way: Real-time tracking of wireless mobile users with UWB -enabled RIS ,'' 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    A. C. Pogaku, D.-T. Do, B. M. Lee, and N. D. Nguyen, `` UAV -assisted RIS for future wireless communications: A survey on optimization and performance analysis,'' IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 16\,320--16\,336, 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    Weinberger, S

    K. Weinberger, S. Tewes, J. Müller, R. Dyrska, M. Mönnigmann, and A. Sezgin, ``Flying intelligent surfaces: Joint adjustment of position and configuration for UAV -mounted RIS ,'' in IEEE VTC, 2023

    2023

  52. [60]

    Müller, K

    D. Müller, K. Weinberger, R. Dyrska, A. Sezgin, and M. Mönnigmann, ``Assessing EKF -based orientation uncertainties and its impact on the channels of UAV -mounted RIS ,'' in VTC-Fall, 2024

    2024

  53. [61]

    Müller, K

    D. Müller, K. Weinberger, A. Sezgin, and M. Mönnigmann, ``The impact of EKF -based position uncertainties on the performance of UAV -mounted RIS ,'' in ICCAS, 2025, pp. 1339--1344

    2025

  54. [62]

    Heinrichs, A

    M. Heinrichs, A. Sezgin, and R. Kronberger, ``Open source reconfigurable intelligent surface for the frequency range of 5 GHz WiFi ,'' in IEEE ISAP, 2023

    2023

  55. [63]

    BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML, ``Evaluation of measurement data --- G uide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.''

  56. [64]

    Weinberger, D

    K. Weinberger, D. Müller, M. Mönnigmann, and A. Sezgin, ``Uncertainty propagation and minimization for channel estimation in UAV -mounted RIS systems,'' in IEEE ICC 2025, 2025, pp. 638--643

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.