Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 102 references

Emergent Topology from Nonlocal Electronic Correlations in One Dimension

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nonlocal Coulomb interactions alone can drive topological bond-order and mixed charge-bond ordered phases from a trivial one-dimensional band structure, each hosting localized edge states.

desk verdict Solid finite-T demonstration that nonlocal V generates BOW and mixed CDW+BOW phases that map onto SSH/Rice-Mele with edge states; the quasistatic assumption is supported by the data they show, not merely asserted. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08278 v1 pith:VUXSDPD4 submitted 2026-07-09 cond-mat.str-el

Félix Fossati , Erik Linnér , Evgeny A. Stepanov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords emergenttopologyextendedHubbardmodelbond-orderwavecharge-densitySu-Schrieffer-HeegerRice-Melenonlocalcorrelationsedgestates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Most topological phases are diagnosed from a noninteracting band structure that is already nontrivial. This paper shows that, in one dimension, strong nonlocal electron-electron repulsion can create topology from a band structure that starts out completely trivial. Using a cluster diagrammatic method on the extended Hubbard chain, the authors find that increasing the nearest-neighbor interaction first stabilizes a bond-order-wave phase and then a mixed charge-density-wave phase that also carries substantial bond dimerization. Inside both ordered states dynamical correlations are strongly suppressed, so the interacting self-energy can be replaced by a static effective single-particle Hamiltonian. That Hamiltonian is precisely the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model for the pure bond-ordered phase and the Rice-Mele model for the mixed phase. Both effective models possess localized edge states, establishing that the topology is genuine and interaction-generated. The result supplies a concrete microscopic route by which correlations, rather than band engineering, produce protected boundary modes.

What carries the argument

The topological Hamiltonian Heff(k) = εk + Re Σ(k, ν=0), obtained once Im Σ vanishes at low frequency inside the ordered phases; this static effective Hamiltonian is then diagonalized on open chains to reveal the edge modes and is identified with the SSH or Rice-Mele models according to the presence or absence of staggered on-site potential.

What would settle it

A calculation (or experiment) that finds a finite low-frequency scattering rate Im Σ(k,ω→0) remaining inside the BOW or CDW+BOW phases, which would invalidate the static topological Hamiltonian and the subsequent mapping onto SSH/Rice-Mele edge states.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Tuning the nonlocal Coulomb interaction V in the half-filled one-dimensional extended Hubbard model drives two interaction-induced ordered phases—a pure bond-order wave and a previously unreported mixed charge-density plus bond-order wave—both of which map onto effective topological single-particle models (SSH and Rice-Mele) that host localized edge states, even though the underlying noninteracting band structure is topologically trivial.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the imaginary part of the self-energy drops to zero at low frequency inside the ordered phases, so that a static effective band Hamiltonian fully captures the topology.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Topology can be switched on and off solely by changing the strength of nonlocal Coulomb repulsion, without altering hoppings or adding spin-orbit coupling.
  • The mixed CDW+BOW phase provides a microscopic realization of the Rice-Mele model that is generated by correlations rather than by an external staggered potential.
  • Edge-localized modes should appear in any spectroscopic or transport probe of open 1D chains once the system enters the BOW or CDW+BOW regime.
  • Cluster-diagrammatic methods that treat short-range correlations non-perturbatively become essential for locating the correct phase boundaries once local-moment formation sets in.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same nonlocal-interaction mechanism could generate higher-dimensional interaction-driven topological phases once short-range cluster correlations are treated non-perturbatively.
  • If the edge states survive weak disorder or weak residual dynamical correlations, they would constitute a new class of correlation-protected boundary modes distinct from conventional topological-insulator surface states.
  • Finite-temperature measurements of bond dimerization versus charge disproportionation near the reported critical lines would directly test the predicted coexistence of BOW and CDW order.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the half-filled one-dimensional extended Hubbard model at finite temperature with a cluster extension of D-TRILEX built around a dimer DMFT reference. Nonlocal repulsion V is shown to stabilize a bond-order-wave (BOW) phase and a mixed CDW+BOW phase. Inside these ordered states the imaginary part of the self-energy is reported to vanish at low Matsubara frequency, allowing construction of a quasistatic topological Hamiltonian Heff(k)=εk+Re Σ(k,ν=0). The BOW phase is thereby mapped onto an effective SSH model and the mixed phase onto a Rice–Mele model; exact diagonalization of Heff on an open chain produces localized edge modes. The phase diagram, order-parameter curves, and the approximate outer self-consistency that restores causality are documented in the main text and Supplemental Material.

Significance. If the quasistatic mapping and the edge-state signatures survive a more complete treatment of residual dynamics, the work would establish a concrete microscopic route by which nonlocal correlations alone generate topology from a trivial band structure. The identification of a mixed CDW+BOW state that maps onto Rice–Mele, the careful documentation of the local-field surrogate for outer self-consistency, and the explicit comparison of single-site versus dimer phase boundaries are genuine technical contributions. The result is of clear interest to the correlated-topology community and is falsifiable by independent zero-temperature methods (DMRG, QMC) or by a fully dynamical outer loop.

major comments (2)
  1. Main text p. 4 and SM “TOPOLOGICAL HAMILTONIAN” / Fig. S3: the central claim that the ordered phases admit an SSH/Rice–Mele description rests on Im Σ(k,ν o0) o0. The paper demonstrates this only after insertion of a static local field h into the dimer hybridization (SM Eqs. S1–S4). Without h the self-energy is non-causal (Im Σ(i u0)>0, Fig. S2). Because the dimer already treats intra-cluster correlations non-perturbatively while inter-cluster correlations remain diagrammatic, residual frequency dependence may reappear once h is removed or a fully dynamical outer loop is performed. If Im Σ remains finite, Z(k) can develop zeros/poles and the edge modes of Fig. 3 lose topological protection. A quantitative bound on residual Im Σ (or an explicit comparison with a dynamical outer self-consistency) is required before the topological interpretation can be regarded as established.
  2. Main text p. 2 and Fig. 2: the BOW critical line is defined by the maximum of the curvature κ(V) of an order parameter that remains finite even outside the ordered phase because of the intrinsic dimer bias. While the procedure is analogous to locating a transition in an external field, it is not a true thermodynamic singularity. The location of VBOWc (and therefore the pure-BOW window) is therefore method-dependent. An independent diagnostic—e.g., the divergence of the bond-bond susceptibility or a finite-size scaling of the dimerization gap—should be supplied, or the pure-BOW region should be presented more cautiously as a crossover.
minor comments (4)
  1. Fig. 3 caption and main-text description: the open-chain spectrum is shown only for U=1.5; a corresponding panel for a point deep in the mixed CDW+BOW phase at larger U would strengthen the claim that the Rice–Mele edge modes are generic.
  2. SM Fig. S1: the self-consistent field components hx, hz are plotted, but the corresponding lattice densities that enter the matching condition (S4) are not shown; adding them would make the outer-loop convergence transparent.
  3. The temperature is fixed at T=0.1 throughout. A brief remark on how the phase boundaries and the Im Σ o0 condition evolve with T would help place the results relative to the extensive zero-temperature literature.
  4. Notation: the BOW order parameter is defined from the lowest Matsubara self-energy difference; a short sentence clarifying why higher frequencies are discarded would remove a possible ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: effective SSH/RM mapping and edge states are post-processing of independently computed self-energy and order parameters.

full rationale

The derivation chain is sequential and non-tautological. The cluster D-TRILEX calculation (with dimer reference and approximate static-field outer self-consistency) produces numerical self-energies, susceptibilities, and order parameters O_CDW and O_BOW as functions of U and V; these are new outputs, not restatements of prior equations. The topological Hamiltonian is then defined in the standard way as Heff(k)=ε_k+ReΣ(k,ν=0) after the paper verifies ImΣ(k,ν→0)→0 (main text p. 4 and SM Fig. S3). The resulting Bloch form is inspected and recognized as SSH (BOW, w_k=0) or Rice-Mele (CDW+BOW, finite w_k); edge localization is obtained by exact diagonalization of that Heff on an open chain (Fig. 3). None of these steps reduces by construction to its inputs: the self-energy is not fitted to produce edge states, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors to force the topology, and the method citations supply a computational framework rather than the claimed physical result. Self-citation of the D-TRILEX series is present but ordinary and non-load-bearing for the circularity criteria. The paper is therefore self-contained against its own numerical benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the cluster D-TRILEX approximation with an approximate outer self-consistency, the quasistatic self-energy approximation inside ordered phases, and the standard topological-Hamiltonian construction. No free parameters are fitted to external data; temperature T=0.1 and the half-filling condition are fixed by the authors. The only invented methodological entity is the local-field surrogate for outer self-consistency.

free parameters (2)
  • Temperature T = 0.1
    Fixed at T=0.1 (in units of t=1) for the entire phase diagram; not fitted but chosen by hand and controls the location of the ordered phases.
  • BOW critical-point definition via curvature maximum
    V_BOW_c is identified with the maximum of the order-parameter curvature κ(V) rather than a true susceptibility divergence, because the dimer geometry already breaks the relevant symmetry.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The dual triply irreducible local expansion (D-TRILEX) with a dimer DMFT reference system plus diagrammatic corrections captures the essential nonlocal correlations of the 1D extended Hubbard model.
    Invoked throughout; the method is taken from the authors' prior works and is not re-derived.
  • ad hoc to paper Inside the BOW and CDW phases Im Σ(k,ν o0) o0, so the topological Hamiltonian Heff(k)=εk+Re Σ(k,ν=0) faithfully encodes the topology.
    Stated on p.4 and supported by SM Fig. S3 at selected points; required for the SSH/Rice-Mele mapping.
  • ad hoc to paper The approximate outer self-consistency via a static local field h is sufficient to restore causality and to obtain physical order parameters.
    Introduced in the SM; replaces a full outer self-consistency that would be numerically prohibitive.
  • standard math Standard noninteracting topological classification (edge states of SSH and Rice-Mele models) applies once the effective Hamiltonian is obtained.
    Used without re-proof; standard textbook result.
invented entities (1)
  • Local-field surrogate for outer self-consistency
    purpose: Approximates the expensive outer self-consistency loop by a static Hermitian field h that matches reference and lattice densities, enabling calculations inside spontaneously broken phases.
    Introduced in the SM; no independent experimental handle; its validity is checked only by internal consistency (causality restoration, physical density difference).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergent Topology from Nonlocal Electronic Correlations in One Dimension." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VUXSDPD4

@misc{pith2026260708278,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergent Topology from Nonlocal Electronic Correlations in One Dimension},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VUXSDPD4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08278}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that electronic correlations in low-dimensional systems can induce topological phases starting from a topologically trivial noninteracting band structure. Using an advanced cluster-diagrammatic many-body approach applied to the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model, we show that tuning the nonlocal Coulomb interaction drives the emergence of bond-order-wave (BOW) and charge-density-wave (CDW) phases. Despite being interaction-driven and symmetry-broken, these states admit an effective low-energy single-particle description. In particular, the BOW phase maps onto an effective Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, while the CDW phase, with subleading bond-order correlations, corresponds to a Rice-Mele model. Both phases exhibit a nontrivial topological character, manifested by the presence of localized edge states. Our results establish a mechanism by which nonlocal electronic correlations generate emergent topology in correlated systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08278 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Evolution of the CDW (blue markers) and BOW (red mark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Energy spectrum of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele,Z 2 Topological Order and the Quan- tum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    B. A. Bernevig and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 106802 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Topological Insulators in Three Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 106803 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    J. E. Moore and L. Balents, Topological invariants of time- reversal-invariant band structures, Phys. Rev. B75, 121306 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Roy, Topological phases and the quantum spin hall effect in three dimensions, Phys

    R. Roy, Topological phases and the quantum spin hall effect in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B79, 195322 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    B. A. Bernevig and T. L. Hughes,Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors(Princeton University Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    D. Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 102 references
  1. [9]

    Cayssol and J

    J. Cayssol and J. N. Fuchs, Topological and geometrical aspects of band theory, J. Phys. Mater.4, 034007 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    A. S. Sergeev, Topological insulators and geometry of vector bundles, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 67 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insula- tors, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    M. Z. Hasan and J. E. Moore, Three-Dimensional Topological Insulators, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.2, 55 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    Zhang and S.-C

    H. Zhang and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators from the perspective of first-principles calculations, Phys. Status solidi (RRL)7, 72 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Y . Ren, Z. Qiao, and Q. Niu, Topological phases in two- dimensional materials: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.79, 066501 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum hall effect with- out landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

    2015

  8. [16]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum Spin Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transition in HgTe Quantum Wells, Science314, 1757 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B55, 1142 (1997)

    1997

  10. [18]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological Quan- tum Chemistry, Nature547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Kruthoff, J

    J. Kruthoff, J. de Boer, J. van Wezel, C. L. Kane, and R.- J. Slager, Topological Classification of Crystalline Insulators through Band Structure Combinatorics, Phys. Rev. X7, 041069 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Oxford University Press, 2003)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Oxford University Press, 2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    Le Hur, Dephasing of Mesoscopic Interferences from Elec- tron Fractionalization, Phys

    K. Le Hur, Dephasing of Mesoscopic Interferences from Elec- tron Fractionalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 076801 (2005)

    2005

  14. [22]

    Le Hur, Electron lifetime in Luttinger liquids, Phys

    K. Le Hur, Electron lifetime in Luttinger liquids, Phys. Rev. B 74, 165104 (2006)

    2006

  15. [23]

    Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s Method of Sound Waves applied to Many-Fermion Problems, Prog

    S. Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s Method of Sound Waves applied to Many-Fermion Problems, Prog. Theor. Phys.5, 544 (1950)

    1950

  16. [24]

    Peierls, On a Minimum Property of the Free Energy, Phys

    R. Peierls, On a Minimum Property of the Free Energy, Phys. Rev.54, 918 (1938)

    1938

  17. [25]

    Nakamura, Mechanism of CDW-SDW Transition in One Di- mension, J

    M. Nakamura, Mechanism of CDW-SDW Transition in One Di- mension, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.68, 3123 (1999)

    1999

  18. [26]

    Nakamura, Tricritical behavior in the extended Hubbard chains, Phys

    M. Nakamura, Tricritical behavior in the extended Hubbard chains, Phys. Rev. B61, 16377 (2000)

    2000

  19. [27]

    Sengupta, A

    P. Sengupta, A. W. Sandvik, and D. K. Campbell, Bond- order-wave phase and quantum phase transitions in the one- dimensional extended Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B65, 155113 (2002)

    2002

  20. [28]

    Tsuchiizu and A

    M. Tsuchiizu and A. Furusaki, Phase Diagram of the One- Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model at Half Filling, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 056402 (2002)

    2002

  21. [29]

    Jeckelmann, Ground-State Phase Diagram of a Half-Filled One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model, Phys

    E. Jeckelmann, Ground-State Phase Diagram of a Half-Filled One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 236401 (2002)

    2002

  22. [30]

    A. W. Sandvik, L. Balents, and D. K. Campbell, Ground State Phases of the Half-Filled One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 236401 (2004)

    2004

  23. [31]

    Tsuchiizu and A

    M. Tsuchiizu and A. Furusaki, Ground-state phase diagram of the one-dimensional half-filled extended Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B69, 035103 (2004)

    2004

  24. [32]

    Tam, S.-W

    K.-M. Tam, S.-W. Tsai, and D. K. Campbell, Functional Renor- malization Group Analysis of the Half-Filled One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 036408 (2006)

    2006

  25. [33]

    Ejima and S

    S. Ejima and S. Nishimoto, Phase Diagram of the One- Dimensional Half-Filled Extended Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 216403 (2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    Di Dio, L

    M. Di Dio, L. Barbiero, A. Recati, and M. Dalmonte, Spon- taneous Peierls dimerization and emergent bond order in one- 6 dimensional dipolar gases, Phys. Rev. A90, 063608 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Juli `a-Farr´e, D

    S. Juli `a-Farr´e, D. Gonz´alez-Cuadra, A. Patscheider, M. J. Mark, F. Ferlaino, M. Lewenstein, L. Barbiero, and A. Dauphin, Revealing the topological nature of the bond order wave in a strongly correlated quantum system, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L032005 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Wang, X.-L

    Z. Wang, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological order parame- ters for interacting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 256803 (2010)

    2010

  29. [37]

    Gurarie, Single-particle Green’s functions and interacting topological insulators, Phys

    V . Gurarie, Single-particle Green’s functions and interacting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B83, 085426 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    A. M. Essin and V . Gurarie, Bulk-boundary correspondence of topological insulators from their respective Green’s functions, Phys. Rev. B84, 125132 (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    Seki and S

    K. Seki and S. Yunoki, Topological interpretation of the Lut- tinger theorem, Phys. Rev. B96, 085124 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    J. Zhao, P. Mai, B. Bradlyn, and P. Phillips, Failure of Topolog- ical Invariants in Strongly Correlated Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 106601 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Blason and M

    A. Blason and M. Fabrizio, Unified role of Green’s function poles and zeros in correlated topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B108, 125115 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Peralta Gavensky, S

    L. Peralta Gavensky, S. Sachdev, and N. Goldman, Connecting the Many-Body Chern Number to Luttinger’s Theorem through Stˇreda’s Formula, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 236601 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    E. A. Stepanov, M. Chatzieleftheriou, N. Wagner, and G. San- giovanni, Interconnected renormalization of Hubbard bands and Green’s function zeros in Mott insulators induced by strong magnetic fluctuations, Phys. Rev. B110, L161106 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Wagner, D

    N. Wagner, D. Guerci, A. J. Millis, and G. Sangiovanni, Edge zeros and boundary spinons in topological mott insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 126504 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    S. R. Manmana, A. M. Essin, R. M. Noack, and V . Gu- rarie, Topological invariants and interacting one-dimensional fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. B86, 205119 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    Wang and S.-C

    Z. Wang and S.-C. Zhang, Simplified Topological Invariants for Interacting Insulators, Phys. Rev. X2, 031008 (2012)

    2012

  39. [47]

    P. W. Klein, A. G. Grushin, and K. Le Hur, Interacting stochas- tic topology and Mott transition from light response, Phys. Rev. B103, 035114 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    A. A. Markov and A. N. Rubtsov, Local marker for interacting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B104, L081105 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Hohenadler and F

    M. Hohenadler and F. F. Assaad, Correlation Effects in Two- Dimensional Topological Insulators, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25, 143201 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    Rachel, Interacting Topological Insulators: A Review, Rep

    S. Rachel, Interacting Topological Insulators: A Review, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 116501 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Rachel and K

    S. Rachel and K. Le Hur, Topological insulators and mott physics from the hubbard interaction, Phys. Rev. B82, 075106 (2010)

    2010

  44. [52]

    Yoshida, S

    T. Yoshida, S. Fujimoto, and N. Kawakami, Correlation effects on a topological insulator at finite temperatures, Phys. Rev. B 85, 125113 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    Y . Tada, R. Peters, M. Oshikawa, A. Koga, N. Kawakami, and S. Fujimoto, Correlation effects in two-dimensional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B85, 165138 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    J. C. Budich, B. Trauzettel, and G. Sangiovanni, Fluctuation- driven topological Hund insulators, Phys. Rev. B87, 235104 (2013)

    2013

  47. [55]

    Amaricci, J

    A. Amaricci, J. C. Budich, M. Capone, B. Trauzettel, and G. Sangiovanni, First-Order Character and Observable Signa- tures of Topological Quantum Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 185701 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    Paoletti, L

    F. Paoletti, L. Fanfarillo, M. Capone, and A. Amaricci, Topo- logical gap opening without symmetry breaking from dynami- cal quantum correlations, Phys. Rev. B109, 075148 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Y .-T. Lin, D. M. Kennes, M. Pletyukhov, C. S. Weber, H. Schoeller, and V . Meden, Interacting Rice-Mele model: Bulk and boundaries, Phys. Rev. B102, 085122 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Raghu, X.-L

    S. Raghu, X.-L. Qi, C. Honerkamp, and S.-C. Zhang, Topolog- ical Mott Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 156401 (2008)

    2008

  51. [59]

    Huang and S

    Z.-M. Huang and S. Diehl, Interaction-Induced Topological Phase Transition at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 053002 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Herbrych, M

    J. Herbrych, M. ´Sroda, G. Alvarez, M. Mierzejewski, and E. Dagotto, Interaction-induced topological phase transition and Majorana edge states in low-dimensional orbital-selective Mott insulators, Nat. Commun.12, 2955 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in Poly- acetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  54. [62]

    M. J. Rice and E. J. Mele, Elementary Excitations of a Lin- early Conjugated Diatomic Polymer, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 1455 (1982)

    1982

  55. [63]

    E. H. Lieb and F. Y . Wu, Absence of Mott Transition in an Exact Solution of the Short-Range, One-Band Model in One Dimen- sion, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 1445 (1968)

    1968

  56. [64]

    R. A. Bari, Effects of Short-Range Interactions on Electron- Charge Ordering and Lattice Distortions in the Localized State, Phys. Rev. B3, 2662 (1971)

    1971

  57. [65]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferromagnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1307 (1966)

    1966

  58. [66]

    P. C. Hohenberg, Existence of Long-Range Order in One and Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev.158, 383 (1967)

    1967

  59. [67]

    M. B. Walker and T. W. Ruijgrok, Absence of Magnetic Or- dering in One and Two Dimensions in a Many-Band Model for Interacting Electrons in a Metal, Phys. Rev.171, 513 (1968)

    1968

  60. [68]

    G. S. Uhrig, Nonexistence of planar magnetic order in the one- and two-dimensional generalized Hubbard model at finite tem- peratures, Phys. Rev. B45, 4738 (1992)

    1992

  61. [69]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Dy- namical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion sys- tems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 13 (1996)

    1996

  62. [70]

    A. M. Sengupta and A. Georges, Non-Fermi-liquid behavior near a T=0 spin-glass transition, Phys. Rev. B52, 10295 (1995)

    1995

  63. [71]

    Si and J

    Q. Si and J. L. Smith, Kosterlitz-Thouless Transition and Short Range Spatial Correlations in an Extended Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3391 (1996)

    1996

  64. [72]

    J. L. Smith and Q. Si, Spatial correlations in dynamical mean- field theory, Phys. Rev. B61, 5184 (2000)

    2000

  65. [73]

    Chitra and G

    R. Chitra and G. Kotliar, Effect of Long Range Coulomb Inter- actions on the Mott Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3678 (2000)

    2000

  66. [74]

    Chitra and G

    R. Chitra and G. Kotliar, Effective-action approach to strongly correlated fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B63, 115110 (2001)

    2001

  67. [76]

    E. A. Stepanov, V . Harkov, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Consistent partial bosonization of the extended Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B100, 205115 (2019)

    2019

  68. [77]

    Harkov, M

    V . Harkov, M. Vandelli, S. Brener, A. I. Lichtenstein, and E. A. Stepanov, Impact of partially bosonized collective fluctuations on electronic degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. B103, 245123 (2021)

    2021

  69. [78]

    Vandelli, J

    M. Vandelli, J. Kaufmann, M. El-Nabulsi, V . Harkov, A. I. Lichtenstein, and E. A. Stepanov, Multi-band D-TRILEX ap- proach to materials with strong electronic correlations, SciPost 7 Phys.13, 036 (2022)

    2022

  70. [79]

    Brener, E

    S. Brener, E. A. Stepanov, A. N. Rubtsov, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Dual fermion method as a prototype of generic reference-system approach for correlated fermions, Ann. Phys.422, 168310 (2020)

    2020

  71. [81]

    See Supplemental Material for the derivation of the self- consistent inclusion of symmetry-breaking fields within the cluster D-TRILEX scheme and their effects on the BOW and CDW order parameters and on causality; the construction of the effective topological Hamiltonian used ...

  72. [82]

    Ole ´s, R

    A. Ole ´s, R. Micnas, S. Robaszkiewicz, and K. Chao, Ground state of the half-filled extended Hubbard model beyond the Hartree-Fock approximation, Phys. Lett. A102, 323 (1984)

    1984

  73. [83]

    Zhang and J

    Y . Zhang and J. Callaway, Extended Hubbard model in two di- mensions, Phys. Rev. B39, 9397 (1989)

    1989

  74. [84]

    Callaway, D

    J. Callaway, D. P. Chen, D. G. Kanhere, and Q. Li, Small-cluster calculations for the simple and extended Hubbard models, Phys. Rev. B42, 465 (1990)

    1990

  75. [85]

    E. A. Stepanov, S. Brener, V . Harkov, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Spin dynamics of itinerant electrons: Lo- cal magnetic moment formation and Berry phase, Phys. Rev. B 105, 155151 (2022)

    2022

  76. [86]

    Chatzieleftheriou, S

    M. Chatzieleftheriou, S. Biermann, and E. A. Stepanov, Lo- cal and Nonlocal Electronic Correlations at the Metal-Insulator Transition in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236504 (2024)

    2024

  77. [87]

    Wang and B

    Z. Wang and B. Yan, Topological Hamiltonian as an Exact Tool for Topological Invariants, J. Phys. Condens. Matter25, 155601 (2013)

    2013

  78. [88]

    Iraola, N

    M. Iraola, N. Heinsdorf, A. Tiwari, D. Lessnich, T. Mertz, F. Ferrari, M. H. Fischer, S. M. Winter, F. Pollmann, T. Neupert, R. Valent´ı, and M. G. Vergniory, Towards a topological quan- tum chemistry description of correlated systems: The case of the Hubbard diamond chain, Ph...

    2021

  79. [89]

    Lessnich, S

    D. Lessnich, S. M. Winter, M. Iraola, M. G. Vergniory, and R. Valent´ı, Elementary band representations for the single- particle Green’s function of interacting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B104, 085116 (2021)

    2021

  80. [90]

    −h” contribution comes from the shift of the hybridization function in the inverse of the bare 2 reference Green’s function, while “¯λch ν,ω=0 h

    M. O. Soldini, N. Astrakhantsev, M. Iraola, A. Tiwari, M. H. Fischer, R. Valent´ı, M. G. Vergniory, G. Wagner, and T. Neu- pert, Interacting topological quantum chemistry of mott atomic limits, Phys. Rev. B107, 245145 (2023). Supplementary Material Emergent Topology from Nonlo...

    2023

  81. [91]

    Fossati and E

    F. Fossati and E. A. Stepanov, Dual-space cluster-diagrammatic approach to nonlocal electronic correlations, Phys. Rev. B113, 075149 (2026)

    2026

  82. [92]

    A. N. Rubtsov, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Dual fermion approach to nonlocal correlations in the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B77, 033101 (2008)

    2008

  83. [93]

    E. A. Stepanov, E. G. C. P. van Loon, A. A. Katanin, A. I. Lichtenstein, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. N. Rubtsov, Self-consistent dual boson approach to single-particle and collective excitations in correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B93, 045107 (2016)

    2016

  84. [94]

    A. B. Migdal,Theory of finite Fermi systems, and applications to atomic nuclei(Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1967)

    1967

  85. [95]

    Vandelli, J

    M. Vandelli, J. Kaufmann, M. El-Nabulsi, V . Harkov, A. I. Lichtenstein, and E. A. Stepanov, Multi-band D-TRILEX approach to materials with strong electronic correlations, SciPost Phys.13, 036 (2022)

    2022

  86. [96]

    E. A. Stepanov,Diagrammatics in the Dual Space, or There and Back Again, Habilitation thesis, ´Ecole Polytechnique (2025)

    2025

  87. [97]

    Backes, J.-H

    S. Backes, J.-H. Sim, and S. Biermann, Nonlocal correlation effects in fermionic many-body systems: Overcoming the noncausality problem, Phys. Rev. B105, 245115 (2022)

    2022

  88. [98]

    Vu ˇciˇcevi´c, N

    J. Vu ˇciˇcevi´c, N. Wentzell, M. Ferrero, and O. Parcollet, Practical consequences of the Luttinger-Ward functional multivaluedness for cluster DMFT methods, Phys. Rev. B97, 125141 (2018)

    2018

  89. [99]

    Lee and K

    J. Lee and K. Haule, Diatomic molecule as a testbed for combining DMFT with electronic structure methods such asGWand DFT, Phys. Rev. B95, 155104 (2017)

    2017

  90. [100]

    Petocchi, V

    F. Petocchi, V . Christiansson, and P. Werner, Fully ab initio electronic structure of Ca2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B104, 195146 (2021)

    2021

  91. [101]

    Nilsson, L

    F. Nilsson, L. Boehnke, P. Werner, and F. Aryasetiawan, Multitier self-consistentGW+EDMFT, Phys. Rev. Mater.1, 043803 (2017)

    2017

  92. [102]

    J. Chen, F. Petocchi, and P. Werner, Causal versus localGW+EDMFT scheme and application to the triangular-lattice extended Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B105, 085102 (2022)

    2022

  93. [103]

    Valli, T

    A. Valli, T. Sch¨afer, P. Thunstr¨om, G. Rohringer, S. Andergassen, G. Sangiovanni, K. Held, and A. Toschi, Dynamical vertex approxima- tion in its parquet implementation: Application to Hubbard nanorings, Phys. Rev. B91, 115115 (2015)

    2015

  94. [104]

    Titvinidze, J

    I. Titvinidze, J. Stobbe, M. Leusch, and G. Rohringer, Suppression of the charge fluctuations by nonlocal correlations close to the Mott transition: Insights from the ladder dynamical vertex approximation, Phys. Rev. B112, 155125 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.