Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Deformed Hermitian-Yang-Mills equation on the manifold of full flags

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read First irreducible higher-rank dHYM connection built in small-radius regime

desk verdict First irreducible higher-rank dHYM connections, plus useful counterexamples to stability conjectures read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08622 v1 pith:WYANAQ7J submitted 2026-07-09 math.DG

Benoit Charbonneau , Gonçalo Oliveira , Rosa Sena-Dias This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DG MSC 53C0753C5532Q26
keywords deformedHermitian-Yang-MillsequationflagmanifoldhigherrankconnectionssmallradiusregimeinvariantcentralchargesstabilityconditionsKählergeometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The deformed Hermitian-Yang-Mills (dHYM) equation is a nonlinear PDE on connections over Kähler manifolds, generalizing the Hermitian-Yang-Mills equation by incorporating a phase angle. Prior work had produced irreducible higher-rank dHYM solutions only in the large-radius limit, where the equation approximates the HYM equation. This paper constructs the first example of an irreducible rank-two dHYM connection in the small-radius regime, where the equation approximates the J-equation instead and where no general existence theory previously yielded irreducible solutions. The construction takes place on the manifold F₂ of full flags in ℂ³, a homogeneous space SU(3)/T² with enough symmetry that invariant connections reduce to a finite-dimensional problem. The authors classify invariant U(2)-connections via Wang's theorem and Schur's lemma, compute the dHYM equation explicitly for these connections, and show it reduces to a quadratic equation in a single parameter 2a². In the small-radius limit (Kähler form scaled as tω with t→0), the leading coefficients of this quadratic satisfy A>0 and C<0, guaranteeing a positive real root and hence an irreducible dHYM connection. The same framework yields irreducible solutions in the large-radius regime for infinitely many bundles, whenever a slope inequality between the constituent line bundles is satisfied. For the rank-one equation, the authors show that dHYM solutions exist for every possible phase angle on F₂, and use explicit central-charge computations for subvarieties to produce counterexamples to two conjectured stability conditions outside the supercritical and hypercritical regimes.

What carries the argument

The homogeneous space F₂ = SU(3)/T² admits invariant (1,1)-forms parametrized by three real constants. For rank-two homogeneous U(2)-bundles, Wang's theorem and Schur's lemma classify invariant connections up to gauge, leaving a single free parameter a. The curvature decomposes into components F_0,...,F_3 valued in the basis {ξ₀,ξ₁,ξ₂,ξ₃} of u(2), and the dHYM equation Im(e^{-iθ}(ω⊗id+FA)³)=0 collapses, via vanishing of the ξ₂ and ξ₃ components, to the condition Im(E₀)Im(E₁) = -Re(E₀)Re(E₁), which is a quadratic in 2a². Asymptotic analysis of the coefficients A, B, C as the Kähler scaling t→0 (small radius) or t→∞ (large radius) determines when a positive root exists.

What would settle it

If the quadratic equation (2a²)²A + 2a²B + C = 0 fails to have a positive real root for some Kähler class in the small-radius regime — for instance if the asymptotic sign analysis of the coefficients A, B, C breaks down for a non-symmetric Kähler metric not covered by the Weyl group reduction — then the irreducible dHYM connection would not exist for that class, contradicting the universality claim of Theorem 59.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The dHYM equation for SU(3)-invariant rank-two connections on F₂ reduces to a quadratic equation in a single real parameter. In the small-radius limit, the coefficients of this quadratic have opposite signs, forcing a positive root and thus an irreducible dHYM connection. This is the first construction of an irreducible higher-rank dHYM connection in the small-radius regime.

Load-bearing premise

The reduction to a single case via the Weyl group action assumes that the Weyl group element preserving the complex structure also preserves the Kähler class and the dHYM equation simultaneously. For symmetric (Kähler-Einstein) metrics this is automatic, but for a general Kähler class the reduction may not cover all cases, potentially narrowing the claimed generality.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The small-radius construction provides a template for finding irreducible dHYM connections on other homogeneous Kähler manifolds where invariant connections reduce to a finite-dimensional system.
  • The rank-one counterexamples to the Collins-Jacob-Yau and hypercritical conjectures on F₂ show that the supercritical hypothesis is genuinely necessary, not merely technical, for the conjectured numerical stability criterion to characterize existence.
  • The explicit central-charge sign computations for curves C₁, C₂, C₃ demonstrate that the Jacob-Sheu sign condition from the one-point blowup of CPⁿ does not generalize to arbitrary threefolds, constraining the search for a universal non-supercritical stability condition.
  • The large-radius existence criterion (slope inequality µ(L₁)<µ(V)<µ(L₂)) connects dHYM existence to Bridgeland-type Z-stability, suggesting that the small-radius regime may admit an analogous stability interpretation via the J-equation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Weyl group reduction to the case i(ρ₁-ρ₂)=+r₁ with a₂=a₃=0 may not cover all Kähler classes, since a Weyl group element mapping r₃→r₁ need not preserve a non-symmetric Kähler class. The small-radius existence claim is therefore unambiguous for Kähler-Einstein metrics (which are Weyl-symmetric) but may require separate verification for general Kähler classes.
  • The quadratic structure of the reduced dHYM equation suggests that on other flag manifolds G/T, similar reductions via Wang's theorem could yield algebraic (rather than PDE-analytic) existence criteria, potentially extending the construction to higher-rank groups.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies the deformed Hermitian-Yang-Mills (dHYM) equation on the full flag manifold F_2 = SU(3)/T^2, in both rank one and rank two. The authors exploit the homogeneous structure of F_2 to reduce the dHYM PDE to explicit algebraic equations via Wang's theorem on invariant connections and the Maurer-Cartan equations. The main results are: (1) in rank one, explicit dHYM solutions exist for every (1,1)-class and every possible phase angle, yielding counterexamples to the Collins-Jacob-Yau and Collins-Yau stability conjectures outside the supercritical/hypercritical regimes; (2) in rank two, the first irreducible dHYM connections are constructed in both the small radius regime (Theorem 59) and the large radius regime (Theorem 57), the former being the paper's headline contribution. The computations are lengthy but self-contained, reducing ultimately to sign analysis of a quadratic equation in the connection parameter 2a^2.

Significance. The construction of the first irreducible higher-rank dHYM connection in the small radius regime (Theorem 10/Theorem 59) is a genuine first and addresses a clear gap in the literature, where most prior work on higher-rank dHYM has been confined to the large radius regime or reducible connections. The rank-one counterexamples to stability conjectures outside the supercritical regime are also valuable, complementing prior work of Zhang and Chu-Lee. The use of homogeneous geometry to obtain fully explicit solutions is an effective strategy that could be exported to other flag-type manifolds. The computations are falsifiable and checkable: the reduction to a quadratic equation (Proposition 55, Eq. 4.16) and the asymptotic sign analyses (Lemmas 56, 58) are concrete and verifiable.

major comments (1)
  1. [Theorem 10 (§1.2) vs Theorem 59 (§4.6)] The introduction states 'for any Kähler form ω on F_2' while the proof of Theorem 59 operates with homogeneous (SU(3)-invariant) Kähler forms parametrized by (A_1, A_2, A_3). Since homogeneous Kähler forms do parametrize the full Kähler cone of F_2, the result does cover every Kähler class. However, the phrasing 'for any Kähler form' in the introduction is misleading because the proof produces a dHYM connection only for the homogeneous representative within each class, not for an arbitrary representative. The body of Theorem 59 correctly says 'for any Kähler class [ω]'. The introduction should be brought in line with the body to avoid confusion. This is a phrasing issue, not a mathematical gap, but it affects the precision of the central claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Remark 50 (§4.3)] The reduction to the case i(ρ_1−ρ_2)=+r_1 with a_2=a_3=0 uses the Weyl group action. The argument that the reflection p_2 preserves the integrable complex structure J_i while swapping r_1↔r_3, and that the sign ambiguity r_1 vs −r_1 is absorbed by the a^2-symmetry of the quadratic (Eq. 4.16), is correct but stated very tersely. A sentence or two spelling out why no generality is lost—especially the point that Eq. 4.16 depends only on a^2—would help the reader.
  2. [§4.4] The vanishing identities R_{23}∧ω_2=0, R_{23}∧dβ_p∧ω=0, etc., are stated without proof. While these follow from α_2 appearing twice in the wedge product, a brief parenthetical justification would improve readability.
  3. [Notation (§3 onward)] The cyclic sum notation P_{⟳i,j,k} is introduced in Eq. (2.14) but used heavily throughout §3–4. A reminder at the start of §3 or in a notation index would be helpful.
  4. [Figures (§3.3, §3.4)] The figures (1a–c, 2, 3, 4a–c) are referenced extensively and are essential for understanding the sign analyses. The manuscript should confirm that publication-quality versions are included in the submission.
  5. [§3.4, Corollary 37] The counterexample to [CY18, Conjecture 8.5] is stated clearly, but the relationship to Chu-Lee's prior counterexample [CL23] (mentioned in Remark 38) could be more precisely delineated—e.g., what does the 3-dimensional counterexample add beyond the 2-dimensional one?
  6. [Lemma 19 (§2.3.1)] The constant c in the expression μ_i = c/(A_j^2 A_k^2) is stated to be independent of i but its value or interpretation is not given. Specifying it (even as a topological constant) would clarify the normalization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not exhibit circularity. The main results (Theorems 10/59 and 11/57) reduce the dHYM equation on homogeneous U(2)-bundles over F_2 = SU(3)/T^2 to an explicit algebraic quadratic equation (Proposition 55, Eq. 4.16) in the parameter 2a^2. This reduction uses Wang's theorem (Theorem 40, an external result from 1958) and the Maurer-Cartan equations (Eq. 2.3) to compute curvature components (Lemma 51), which are then substituted into the dHYM equation (Lemma 52) to obtain the quadratic. The existence of solutions is then established by sign analysis of the coefficients A, B, C in the small and large radius limits (Lemmas 56, 58), which is a direct asymptotic computation. No parameter is fitted to data and then presented as a prediction. The rank-one results (Theorem 23) follow because invariant (1,1)-forms have constant eigenvalues, making the dHYM equation trivially satisfied. The counterexamples to the Collins-Jacob-Yau and Collins-Yau conjectures (Theorems 7, 9, Corollaries 31, 37) are computed directly from the central charge formulas (Lemma 26) without assuming the conjectures they refute. Self-citations (e.g., to [Oli22] for Wang's theorem exposition) are expository, not load-bearing for the mathematical argument. The derivation is genuinely independent of its conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new mathematical entities are postulated. The constructions use standard objects: homogeneous bundles over SU(3)/T², invariant connections classified by Wang's theorem, and central charges as defined in prior work. The free parameter a is solved from the dHYM equation, not chosen ad hoc.

free parameters (1)
  • a (connection parameter) = 2a² = (-B + √(B²-4AC))/(2A)
    The invariant connection on the rank-2 bundle is parameterized by a single real number a. The dHYM equation reduces to a quadratic in 2a² whose coefficients A, B, C depend on the bundle topology and Kähler metric. The solution is not fitted but solved from the equation.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Wang's theorem for invariant connections on homogeneous bundles
    Used in §4.2 to classify SU(3)-invariant connections on Pρ → F₂. This is a standard result from [Wan58].
  • domain assumption Collins-Jacob-Yau conjecture (Conjecture 4) and Collins-Yau conjecture (Conjecture 5)
    These conjectures are the targets of the counterexamples. They are not assumed true; rather, the paper shows they fail outside the supercritical/hypercritical regime.
  • domain assumption Existence of lifted angle and non-emptiness of H_Ω (Definition 1)
    The analytic framework for the dHYM equation assumes ZX(Ω)≠0 and H_Ω is non-empty. For the homogeneous solutions on F₂, these are verified directly since the eigenvalues λᵢ are constant.
  • standard math Maurer-Cartan equations for SU(3)
    The structural equations (2.3) are used throughout for all curvature computations. Standard Lie group theory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deformed Hermitian-Yang-Mills equation on the manifold of full flags." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WYANAQ7J

@misc{pith2026260708622,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deformed Hermitian-Yang-Mills equation on the manifold of full flags},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WYANAQ7J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08622}
}
read the original abstract

We construct the first example of a higher rank, irreducible deformed Hermitian-Yang-Mills (dHYM) connection in the small radius regime. We also construct these in the large radius regime on infinitely many different bundles and make some contributions to the rank one equation as well. In particular, we investigate solutions away from the supercritical regime, showing the existence of solutions with any possible angle, and rule out some possible stability conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08622 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of the supercritical regions and the same-sign region in the H2 (F2, R) plane in the (m1, m3) coordinates. Corollary 31 (Non-supercritical classes for which Im ZV (−iFm) ZF2 (−iFm) > 0 for all subvariety V ). Let F2 be equipped with a homogeneous K¨ahler–Einstein metric. Then, for any m = (m1, m3) ∈ Z 2 such that 3m1 + m3 < 0 and m1 + 3m3 < 0, there is Am > 0 such that for all A > Am, the connection βm on… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The (1, 1)-classes for which at least two of the Im ZCi (−iFm) ZF2 (−iFm) have different signs. Corollary 34. Let m1 + m3 = 0, then Im ZC2 (−iFm) ZF2 (−iFm) ! = 0, and there is a solution to the dHYM equation in the class [−iFm]. 3.4. The hypercritical regime. Let us start by characterising the classes [κ] for which Im ZF2 (κ) > 0. Lemma 35. Let (m1, m3) ∈ R 2 and the corresponding class κm = −iFm ∈ H1,1 (F2, R). Th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The classes which satisfy Im ZF2 > 0 for the K¨ahler–Einstein struc￾ture with scaling A = 1 (horizontal hatching) and A = 2 (vertical hatching). Now we characterise those classes for which Im ZV > 0 for all irreducible sub-varieties V . Lemma 36. Let (m1, m3) ∈ R 2 and consider the corresponding class κm ∈ H1,1 (F2, R). Then, considering the K¨ahler–Einstein structure with scaling A > 0, we have Im ZV (κm) > 0 for a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: c gives a graphical representation of the counterexamples to [CY18, Conjecture 8.5]. −4 −2 2 4 −4 −2 2 4 m1 m3 (a) The positive-sign region P, defined by m1 + 2m3 < 0 and 2m1 + m3 < 0, equivalently the region where Im ZV > 0 for all subvarieties V . −4 −2 2 4 −4 −2 2 4…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The deformed Vortex equations and equivariant stability conditions

    math.DG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    On vortex-type SU(2)-equivariant bundles over a product of a curve with P¹, solvability of the deformed Hermitian–Yang–Mills system is equivalent to Z-stability, and Bridgeland stability implies Z-stability.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Twistor geometry of the flag manifold

    [ABBS23] Amedeo Altavilla, Edoardo Ballico, Maria Chiara Brambilla, and Simon Salamon. Twistor geometry of the flag manifold . Math. Z. 303 (2023), no. 1, Paper No. 24,

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Twistor geometry of the Flag manifold

    doi:10.1007/s00209-022-03161-x. arXiv:2112.11100 ↑14. [Bal23] Aashirwad Ballal. The supercritical deformed Hermitian Yang–Mills equation on compact projective manifolds. Illinois J. Math. 67 (2023), no. 1, pp. 73–99. doi:10.1215/00192082-10417484. arXiv:2108.00876 ↑2. [BH58] A. Borel and F. Hirzebruch. Characteristic classes and homogeneous spaces. I . Am...

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1007/s00209-022-03161-x 2023

  3. [3]

    44 REFERENCES [Bry06] Robert L. Bryant. On the geometry of almost complex 6-manifolds . Asian J. Math. 10 (2006), no. 3, pp. 561–605. doi: 10 . 4310 / AJM . 2006 . v10 . n3 . a4. arXiv:math/0508428 ↑7. [BT82] Raoul Bott and Loring W. Tu. Differential forms in algebraic topology. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 82 (1982), pp. xiv+331 ↑11. [Che04] X. X. Chen....

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.4310/cag.2004.v12.n4.a4 2006

  4. [4]

    The J-equation and the supercritical deformed Hermitian–Yang–Mills equation

    [Che21] Gao Chen. The J-equation and the supercritical deformed Hermitian–Yang–Mills equation. Invent. Math. 225 (2021), no. 2, pp. 529–602. doi: 10.1007/s00222- 021-01035-3 ↑2–4. [CJY20] Tristan C. Collins, Adam Jacob, and Shing-Tung Yau. (1,

    work page doi:10.1007/s00222- 2021

  5. [5]

    forms with specified Lagrangian phase: a priori estimates and algebraic obstructions . Camb. J. Math. 8 (2020), no. 2, pp. 407–452. doi: 10.4310/cjm.2020.v8.n2.a4 ↑2,

    work page doi:10.4310/cjm.2020.v8.n2.a4 2020

  6. [6]

    [CL23] Jianchun Chu and Man-Chun Lee.Hypercritical deformed Hermitian–Yang–Mills equation revisited. J. Reine Angew. Math. 801 (2023), pp. 161–172. doi:10.1515/ crelle-2023-0034. arXiv:2206.00387 ↑4,

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Stability for Line Bundles and Deformed Hermitian-Yang-Mills Equation on Some Elliptic Surfaces

    arXiv: 2306.05620 ↑2. [CLT24] Jianchun Chu, Man-Chun Lee, and Ryosuke Takahashi. A Nakai–Moishezon type criterion for supercritical deformed Hermitian–Yang–Mills equation . J. Differential Geom. 126 (2024), no. 2, pp. 583–632. doi:10.4310/jdg/1712344220. arXiv:2105.10725 ↑3. [Cor24] Eder M. Correa. DHYM instantons on higher rank holomorphic vector bundles...

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.4310/jdg/1712344220 2024

  8. [8]

    Stability and the deformed Hermitian–Yang– Mills equation

    doi: 10.1007/s00209- 024-03592-8. arXiv:2307.05787 ↑5. [CS17] Tristan C. Collins and G´ abor Sz´ ekelyhidi.Convergence of the J-flow on toric manifolds. J. Differential Geom. 107 (2017), no. 1, pp. 47–81. doi: 10.4310/jdg/ 1505268029. arXiv:1412.4809 ↑3. [CS22] Tristan C. Collins and Yun Shi. “Stability and the deformed Hermitian–Yang– Mills equation”. In...

    work page doi:10.1007/s00209- 2017

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    The deformed Hermitian– Yang–Mills equation in geometry and physics

    Surv. Differ. Geom. Int. Press, Boston, MA, 2022, pp. 1–38 ↑2. [CXY18] Tristan C. Collins, Dan Xie, and Shing-Tung Yau. “The deformed Hermitian– Yang–Mills equation in geometry and physics”. In: Geometry and physics. Vol. I: A Festschrift in honour of Nigel Hitchin . Oxford Un...

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    [DMS24] Ruadha´ ı Dervan, John Benjamin McCarthy, and Lars Martin Sektnan.Z-critical connections and Bridgeland stability conditions

    doi: 10.1007/s40818-021-00100-7 ↑2. [DMS24] Ruadha´ ı Dervan, John Benjamin McCarthy, and Lars Martin Sektnan.Z-critical connections and Bridgeland stability conditions . Camb. J. Math. 12 (2024), no. 2, pp. 253–355. doi: 10.4310/cjm.2024.v12.n2.a1 . arXiv:2012.10426 ↑5, 6,

    2024 doi arXiv

  3. [11]

    Minimal slopes and bubbling for complex Hessian equations

    REFERENCES 45 [DMS26] Ved Datar, Ramesh Mete, and Jian Song. Minimal slopes and bubbling for complex Hessian equations . Adv. Math. 491 (2026), Paper No. 110865,

    2026

  4. [12]

    Moment maps and diffeomorphisms

    doi:10.1016/j.aim.2026.110865. arXiv:2312.03370 ↑5. [DNST25] R´ emi Delloque, Achim Napame, Carlo Scarpa, and Carl Tipler. Polynomial Stability Conditions for Vector Bundles: Positivity, Equivariance and Blow-Ups (2025). arXiv:2506.23842 ↑5. [Don99] S. K. Donaldson. “Moment ma...

    2026 doi

  5. [13]

    1999, pp

    Sir Michael Atiyah: a great mathematician of the twentieth century. 1999, pp. 1–15. doi:

    1999

  6. [14]

    [DP21] Ved V

    4310/AJM.1999.v3.n1.a1 ↑2. [DP21] Ved V. Datar and Vamsi Pritham Pingali. A numerical criterion for generalised Monge–Amp` ere equations on projective manifolds. Geom. Funct. Anal. 31 (2021), no. 4, pp. 767–814. doi: 10.1007/s00039-021-00577-1. arXiv:2006.01530 ↑3. [Fan26] Yu-...

    1999 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    doi: 10.1016/j.aim.2024. 109867. arXiv:2309.15451 ↑3. [Fow24a] Udhav Fowdar. Examples of deformed Spin(7)-instantons/Donaldson–Thomas connections. Comm. Math. Phys. 405 (2024), no. 8, Paper No. 183,

    2024 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    arXiv:2311.11794 ↑6

    1007/s00220-024-05060-0. arXiv:2311.11794 ↑6. [Fow24b] Udhav Fowdar. Explicit abelian instantons on S1-invariant K ¨ahler Einstein 6-manifolds. J. Geom. Phys. 203 (2024), Paper No. 105269,

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    geomphys.2024.105269

    doi: 10.1016/j. geomphys.2024.105269. arXiv:2207.02940 ↑6. [FYZ24] Jixiang Fu, Shing-Tung Yau, and Dekai Zhang. A new flow solving the LYZ equation in K¨ahler geometry. J. Differential Geom. 128 (2024), no. 1, pp. 153–192. doi:10.4310/jdg/1721075261. arXiv:2105.13576 ↑3. [FYZ2...

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    arXiv:1909.08871 ↑2

    doi: 10.1007/s00526-020-01880-9. arXiv:1909.08871 ↑2. [HJ24] Xiaoli Han and Xishen Jin. Chern number inequalities of deformed Hermitian- Yang-Mills metrics on four dimensional K ¨ahler manifolds. Manuscripta Math. 174 (2024), no. 3-4, pp. 963–972. doi:10.1007/s00229-023-01531-...

    1909 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    A special Lagrangian type equation for holomorphic line bundles

    [JY17] Adam Jacob and Shing-Tung Yau. A special Lagrangian type equation for holomorphic line bundles . Math. Ann. 369 (2017), no. 1-2, pp. 869–898. doi:

    2017

  12. [20]

    Z-critical equations for holomorphic vector bundles on K ¨ahler surfaces

    [KS26] Julien Keller and Carlo Scarpa. Z-critical equations for holomorphic vector bundles on K ¨ahler surfaces. Math. Ann. 395 (2026), no. 1, Paper No. 10,

    2026

  13. [21]

    arXiv:2405.03312 ↑5

    doi:10.1007/s00208-026-03441-5. arXiv:2405.03312 ↑5. [LE26] Luiz Lara and Henrique N. S´ a Earp. Asymptotically Z-stable bundles over projective surfaces (2026). arXiv:2604.20264 ↑5. [Lin23] Chao-Ming Lin. The deformed Hermitian–Yang–Mills equation, the Positivstel- lensatz, a...

    2026 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    Stability conditions and canonical metrics

    1016/j.aim.2023.109312 ↑2. [Lin24] Chao-Ming Lin. Deformed Hermitian–Yang–Mills equation on compact Hermit- ian manifolds. Math. Res. Lett. 31 (2024), no. 1, pp. 207–254. doi: 10.4310/mrl. 240904213410 ↑2. [LS15] Mehdi Lejmi and G´ abor Sz´ ekelyhidi. The J-flow and stability ...

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    [Met26] Ramesh Mete

    arXiv: 2302.04966 ↑2. [Met26] Ramesh Mete. Singularity formation in co-dimension one of the dHYM cotangent flow on blow up of CP3 at a point (2026). arXiv:2409.14404 ↑5. [MMMS00] Marcos Mari˜ no, Ruben Minasian, Gregory Moore, and Andrew Strominger. Nonlinear instantons from s...

    2026 arXiv

  16. [24]

    arXiv: hep- th/ 9911206 ↑2

    doi: 10.1088/1126- 6708/2000/01/005 . arXiv: hep- th/ 9911206 ↑2. [Mur26a] Rei Murakami. J-equations and deformed Hermitian–Yang–Mills equations on holomorphic submersions . Math. Z. 312 (2026), no. 3, Paper No. 91,

    2026 doi

  17. [25]

    [Mur26b] Rei Murakami

    doi:10.1007/s00209-026-03981-1 ↑2. [Mur26b] Rei Murakami. Weak limits of the J-flow and the deformed Hermitian–Yang– Mills flow on K ¨ahler surfaces: boundary cases . Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 69 (2026), no. 2, Paper No. 7,

    2026 doi

  18. [26]

    doi: 10.1007/s10455-026-10032-9 ↑3,

    doi

  19. [27]

    Some useful facts on invariant connections

    [Oli22] Gon¸ calo Oliveira. “Some useful facts on invariant connections”. In: Current trends in analysis, its applications and computation . Trends Math. Res. Perspect. Birkh¨auser/Springer, Cham, 2022, pp. 483–493. doi: 10 . 1007 / 978 - 3 - 030 - 87502-2\_49 ↑27. [Pin19] Vam...

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    [SW08] Jian Song and Ben Weinkove

    doi: 10.1007/ s12220-024-01636-3 ↑2. [SW08] Jian Song and Ben Weinkove. On the convergence and singularities of the J-flow with applications to the Mabuchi energy . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 61 (2008), no. 2, pp. 210–229. doi: 10.1002/cpa.20182. arXiv:math/0410418 ↑2,

    2008 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    [Sz´ e18] G´ abor Sz´ ekelyhidi.Fully non-linear elliptic equations on compact Hermitian manifolds. J. Differential Geom. 109 (2018), no. 2, pp. 337–378. doi: 10.4310/ jdg/1527040875 ↑3. [Tak20] R. Takahashi. Tan-concavity property for Lagrangian phase operators and appli- cat...

    2018

  22. [30]

    [Tak24] Ryosuke Takahashi

    doi: 10.1142/S0129167X20501165 ↑3. [Tak24] Ryosuke Takahashi. J-equation on holomorphic vector bundles . J. Funct. Anal. 286 (2024), no. 4, Paper No. 110265,

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    [Wan58] Hsien-chung Wang

    doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2023.110265 ↑5. [Wan58] Hsien-chung Wang. On invariant connections over a principal fibre bundle . Nagoya Math. J. 13 (1958), pp. 1–19 ↑14, 26,

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    Convergence of the J-flow on K ¨ahler surfaces

    [Wei04] Ben Weinkove. Convergence of the J-flow on K ¨ahler surfaces. Comm. Anal. Geom. 12 (2004), no. 4, pp. 949–965. doi: 10 . 4310 / cag . 2004 . v12 . n4 . a8. arXiv:math/0306012 ↑2,

    2004 arXiv

  25. [33]

    On the J-flow in higher dimensions and the lower boundedness of the Mabuchi energy

    [Wei06] Ben Weinkove. On the J-flow in higher dimensions and the lower boundedness of the Mabuchi energy . J. Differential Geom. 73 (2006), no. 2, pp. 351–358. arXiv:math/0309404 ↑2,

    2006 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Special Lagrangian and deformed Hermitian Yang–Mills on tropical manifold

    [Yam18] Hikaru Yamamoto. Special Lagrangian and deformed Hermitian Yang–Mills on tropical manifold. Math. Z. 290 (2018), no. 3-4, pp. 1023–1040. doi: 10.1007/ s00209-018-2050-0 ↑2. [Zha23] Junsheng Zhang. A note on the supercritical deformed Hermitian–Yang–Mills equation (2023...

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.