Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Asymmetric high-harmonic generation from subwavelength bianisotropic resonators

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single subwavelength bilayer resonator generates third, fifth and seventh harmonics with strong forward-backward directionality set by multipolar bianisotropy.

desk verdict Clean experimental demo of direction-selective multi-order HHG from one subwavelength bilayer resonator; multipole story is only interpretive and the result stands without it. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08715 v2 pith:OKBXMXFU submitted 2026-07-09 physics.optics

Albert Mathew , Piyush Jangid , Rebecca Aschwanden , Yves Köppeler , Thomas Zentgraf , Sergey Kruk This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords high-harmonicgenerationMieresonancesbianisotropysubwavelengthresonatorsdielectricnanophotonicsasymmetricnonlinearresponsemultipolardecomposition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that one dielectric resonator only a fraction of a wavelength across can serve as a direction-selective source of high-order harmonics. Because the resonator is a bilayer of silicon and silicon nitride, it lacks inversion symmetry along the light path; light arriving from the air side therefore couples to a different mix of electric and magnetic multipoles than light arriving from the substrate side. Those linear multipoles set how strongly the intense mid-infrared pump is concentrated inside the material, so the same resonator produces third, fifth and seventh harmonics far more efficiently in one direction than the other. Measured intensity contrasts reach 55 for the fifth harmonic. The work therefore adds engineered geometric asymmetry to the existing toolkit of Mie-resonant nanophotonics for controlling strong-field light-matter interactions, offering a compact solid-state route toward directional attosecond and extreme-ultraviolet sources.

What carries the argument

Multipolar bianisotropy of a C_infinity_v bilayer resonator: the absence of inversion symmetry allows the T-matrix to couple electric and magnetic multipoles of the same azimuthal order, so forward and backward pumps drive different near-field confinements and therefore different nonlinear conversion efficiencies.

What would settle it

Measure the same set of resonators under identical pump conditions but with the sapphire substrate replaced by an index-matched medium or removed entirely; if the forward-backward harmonic contrasts collapse while the linear extinction remains, the claimed multipolar mechanism is ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A single dielectric subwavelength resonator whose geometrical volume is only 0.12 lambda cubed can act as a direction-selective high-harmonic source. Structural asymmetry along the propagation axis produces multipolar bianisotropy: opposite illumination directions excite different combinations of electric and magnetic dipoles and quadrupoles, which in turn yield pronounced forward-backward intensity contrasts (up to 55) in the generation of the third, fifth and seventh harmonics.

Load-bearing premise

The multipole decomposition calculated for a resonator sitting on a substrate is still a reliable enough guide to which current distributions actually drive the nonlinear response.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript experimentally demonstrates and theoretically interprets direction-selective high-harmonic generation (third, fifth, and seventh) from a single subwavelength bilayer dielectric resonator (a-Si / Si3N4 cylinder on sapphire). Structural asymmetry along the propagation axis produces bianisotropy, so that opposite illumination directions excite different multipolar compositions (primarily EQ/MQ vs MD) of the Mie response. This yields measured forward-to-backward intensity contrasts as large as ~55 for the fifth harmonic, systematically mapped versus resonator diameter and pump wavelength. Linear COMSOL calculations of near-field confinement (mode volume 0.03 λ^{3}), extinction, and approximate multipole decompositions are shown to track the spectral locations of the observed HHG asymmetry. The central claim is that a single bianisotropic Mie resonator can function as a compact, direction-selective high-harmonic source.

Significance. If the reported contrasts and spectral maps hold, the work supplies a concrete new control knob—propagation-direction asymmetry engineered via refractive-index bilayering—for solid-state HHG. Prior nanophotonic HHG studies have emphasized field enhancement, wavefront shaping, or chirality; direction-selective emission from an isolated subwavelength resonator (geometrical volume 0.12 λ^{3}) is a distinct addition to that toolbox and is relevant to compact attosecond or EUV sources. Strengths include systematic experimental diameter–wavelength maps for multiple harmonics, large measured contrasts, and transparent linear simulations that locate the resonances. The multipole analysis, while approximate, is presented only as a qualitative mechanism and is not required for the experimental claim itself.

major comments (2)
  1. Theory section (after Eq. 6 and Figs. 1g,h): the multipole decomposition is performed for a substrate-supported resonator yet is formally valid only in a homogeneous background. The authors correctly label it “approximate” and “qualitative,” but the subsequent claim that forward excitation preferentially drives EQ/MQ while backward drives MD is used to explain the HHG asymmetry. A short quantitative check (e.g., comparison of the multipole-reconstructed far-field with the full COMSOL far-field, or a homogeneous-background reference calculation) would strengthen the mechanistic link without altering the experimental result.
  2. Experiment / Fig. 3: the third- and fifth-harmonic contrast maps are obtained after a 3 imes3 Gaussian-weighted average. The raw (unaveraged) data should be shown in the SI or as an inset so that readers can judge whether the reported peak contrasts (30 for 3rd, 55 for 5th) and the spectral offset between 3rd- and 5th-harmonic maxima survive without smoothing. This is load-bearing for the quantitative claim of “pronounced” asymmetry.
minor comments (4)
  1. Abstract and Introduction: the phrase “optical mode volume is 0.03 λ^{3}” is given without stating the precise integration domain or the wavelength used for normalization; a one-sentence clarification (already present later in Theory) would help.
  2. Fig. 1 caption and panels i–q: axis labels and color-bar units are dense; increasing font size or splitting the multipole maps into two figures would improve readability.
  3. Methods: the average power is fixed at 10 mW, but the corresponding peak intensity at the sample is stated only later; moving the intensity figure of merit earlier would aid comparison with damage-threshold literature.
  4. References: a few recent works on bianisotropic dielectric meta-atoms and on substrate effects in multipole expansions could be added for completeness, but this is optional.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; experimental HHG asymmetries are independent measurements, with multipole analysis used only for post-hoc qualitative interpretation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental demonstration of direction-dependent third-, fifth-, and seventh-harmonic generation from a single bilayer Si/Si3N4 subwavelength resonator (geometrical volume 0.12 λ^{3}, mode volume 0.03 λ^{3}), with measured F/B intensity contrasts up to 55 (Figs. 2–4). Linear COMSOL calculations of near-fields, extinction, and approximate multipole decompositions (Theory section, Eqs. 1–6, Figs. 1c–q and 3a) supply a plausible mechanism via multipolar bianisotropy in the E1 subspace of C∞v, but these are not used to fit free parameters that are later re-presented as predictions, nor do they define the measured contrasts by construction. The multipole decomposition is explicitly flagged as approximate for a substrate-supported scatterer and treated only as a qualitative diagnostic. Self-citations (e.g., to prior metasurface work [27]) are comparative only and not load-bearing. Symmetry arguments invoke standard group theory and external references. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input-as-prediction, uniqueness theorems imported from the authors, or ansatz smuggling appear. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external experimental benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard Maxwell electromagnetism, the known multipole expansion, and the experimental observation of direction-dependent harmonic intensities. No new particles, forces or free parameters are introduced to force the result; the few numerical choices (layer thicknesses, diameters) are design parameters, not fitted constants that later reappear as predictions.

free parameters (2)
  • Si / Si3N4 layer heights = 1.21 µm / 0.9 µm
    Fixed at 1.21 µm and 0.9 µm respectively to place the multipolar resonances in the mid-IR pump band; chosen by design rather than fitted to the harmonic data.
  • resonator diameters = 1.77–2.20 µm
    Scanned from 1.77–2.20 µm to map resonances; the values that maximise contrast are selected post-measurement but are not free parameters inside a predictive model.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Exact multipole expansion of the scattered field remains a qualitatively valid diagnostic even when the scatterer sits on a substrate whose reflectance is small.
    Stated explicitly in the Theory section; used to assign ED/MD/EQ/MQ weights that explain the observed HHG asymmetry.
  • domain assumption Centrosymmetric bulk nonlinearities of a-Si and Si3N4 produce only odd-order harmonics; geometric symmetry breaking is insufficient to generate detectable even harmonics under the present design.
    Invoked to explain the absence of even harmonics in the measured spectra.
  • standard math C∞v point-group selection rules allow electric-field coupling between electric and magnetic multipoles of the same azimuthal order m=1 (E1 irrep).
    Standard group-theory result applied to the bilayer cylinder; cited via Gladyshev et al. and related works.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymmetric high-harmonic generation from subwavelength bianisotropic resonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OKBXMXFU

@misc{pith2026260708715,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymmetric high-harmonic generation from subwavelength bianisotropic resonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OKBXMXFU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08715}
}
abstract

High-harmonic generation (HHG) enables attosecond light pulses and table-top sources of coherent extreme-ultraviolet and soft X-ray radiation. Although HHG has long been associated with gases and plasma, nanostructured solids are emerging as new alternative sources enabling both the enhancement and control of HHG. Here, we experimentally demonstrate and theoretically describe that a single dielectric subwavelength resonator can act as a direction-selective high-harmonic source, enabling control over multiple harmonic orders through the excitation and hybridization of Mie modes. The resonator's geometrical volume is $0.12 \lambda^3$, and its optical mode volume is $0.03 \lambda^3$ at its pump wavelength. Structural asymmetry of the resonator along the propagation direction translates into different mode coupling under opposite illumination directions, resulting in pronounced forward-backward asymmetry in the generation of the third, fifth, and seventh harmonics. These results establish bianisotropic subwavelength resonators as a platform for flexible asymmetric generation of high harmonics, expanding the toolbox for controlling strong-field light-matter interactions with Mie-resonant nanophotonics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08715 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Calculations of linear optical response of a Si-Si3N4 resonator. (a,b) Concept of asymmetric generation of odd-harmonics, including the third (3ω), fifth (5ω), and seventh (7ω) harmonics, from the subwavelength resonator under the “forward” and “backward” excitations. (c,d) COMSOL calculations of near-field distribution within the resonator for the “forward” and “backward” excitations. Resonator diameter: 2.1 µm, Si… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental results on asymmetric generation of multiple harmon￾ics. (a,b) Scanning electron micrograph of one of the fabricated resonators of diameter 2.1µm: top view and side view. (c) The third (3ω), fifth (5ω) and seventh (7ω) har￾monics generation observed from the subwavelength resonator with diameter of 2.1 µm shown in (a,b) at an excitation wavelength of 3560 nm. The third harmonic data were col￾lected usin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Response of asymmetric resonators as a function of excitation wave￾length and the resonator diameter. (a) COMSOL calculations of extinction for for￾ward (top left) and backward (top right) directions, as well as forward/backward extinction contrast. In the contrast map, the saturation (from gray to colorful) indicates combined extinction (forward + backward). (b,c) Experimental measurements of third-harmonic (b) and… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Asymmetric high-harmonic generation. Forward (blue) and backward (red) (a) third, (b) fifth, and (c) seventh harmonics generation from the resonator of diameter 2.1 µm. The third harmonic data were collected using the InGaAs-based detector, while the fifth and seventh …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Scattering and absorption cross-section The scattering and absorption cross section of Si-SiN subwavelength resonators simulated using COMSOL as a function of excitation wavelength and the diameter of the cylidrical resonators(a) The colourplot of forward and backward …

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Enhancement of HHG has been investigated across various resonant nanophotonic platforms, beginning with plasmonic nanostructures [10, 16–21]

    often via excitation of localized Mie modes or bound states in the continuum. Enhancement of HHG has been investigated across various resonant nanophotonic platforms, beginning with plasmonic nanostructures [10, 16–21]. While plasmonic structures offered strong field enhancements combined with tight field confinements, they suffered from intrinsic Ohmic l...

  2. [2]

    forward” and “backward

    and 2 nd [28] harmonics. Here, by leveraging the interplay between nonlinear light-matter interactions and bianisotropic response in asymmetric nanoresonators, we experimentally demonstrate direction-dependent generation of multiple harmon- ics. Our platform consists of individual subwavelength resonators composed of two layers: amorphous silicon (Si) and...

    1950

  3. [3]

    Ferray, A

    M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. Li, L. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, Multiple- harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics21, L31 (1988)

    1988

  4. [4]

    Burnett, H

    N. Burnett, H. Baldis, M. Richardson, and G. Enright, Harmonic generation in CO 2 laser target interaction, Applied Physics Letters31, 172 (1977)

    1977

  5. [5]

    Ghimire, A

    S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nature Physics7, 138 (2011)

    2011

  6. [6]

    Goulielmakis and T

    E. Goulielmakis and T. Brabec, High harmonic generation in condensed matter, Na- ture Photonics16, 411 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Ghimire and D

    S. Ghimire and D. A. Reis, High-harmonic generation from solids, Nature Physics15, 10 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Schubert, M

    O. Schubert, M. Hohenleutner, F. Langer, B. Urbanek, C. Lange, U. Huttner, D. Golde, T. Meier, M. Kira, S. W. Koch,et al., Sub-cycle control of terahertz high- harmonic generation by dynamical bloch oscillations, Nature Photonics8, 119 (2014)

    2014

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    T. T. Luu, M. Garg, S. Y. Kruchinin, A. Moulet, M. T. Hassan, and E. Goulielmakis, Extreme ultraviolet high-harmonic spectroscopy of solids, Nature521, 498 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    M. R. Shcherbakov, H. Zhang, M. Tripepi, G. Sartorello, N. Talisa, A. AlShafey, Z. Fan, J. Twardowski, L. A. Krivitsky, A. I. Kuznetsov,et al., Generation of even and odd high harmonics in resonant metasurfaces using single and multiple ultra- intense laser pulses, Nature Comm...

    2021

  3. [11]

    Zalogina, L

    A. Zalogina, L. Carletti, A. Rudenko, J. V. Moloney, A. Tripathi, H.-C. Lee, I. Shadrivov, H.-G. Park, Y. Kivshar, and S. S. Kruk, High-harmonic generation from a subwavelength dielectric resonator, Science Advances9, eadg2655 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Vampa, B

    G. Vampa, B. Ghamsari, S. Siadat Mousavi, T. Hammond, A. Olivieri, E. Lisicka- Skrek, A. Y. Naumov, D. Villeneuve, A. Staudte, P. Berini,et al., Plasmon-enhanced high-harmonic generation from silicon, Nature Physics13, 659 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Zograf, K

    G. Zograf, K. Koshelev, A. Zalogina, V. Korolev, R. Hollinger, D.-Y. Choi, M. Zuerch, C. Spielmann, B. Luther-Davies, D. Kartashov,et al., High-harmonic generation from resonant dielectric metasurfaces empowered by bound states in the continuum, ACS Photonics9, 567 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    An and K.-H

    J.-K. An and K.-H. Kim, Efficient non-perturbative high-harmonic generation from nonlinear metasurfaces with low pump intensity, Optics & Laser Technology135, 106702 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    S. D. Roscam Abbing, R. Kolkowski, Z.-Y. Zhang, F. Campi, L. L¨ otgering, A. F. Koen- derink, and P. M. Kraus, Extreme-ultraviolet shaping and imaging by high-harmonic generation from nanostructured silica, Physical Review Letters128, 223902 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Jangid, F

    P. Jangid, F. U. Richter, M. L. Tseng, I. Sinev, S. Kruk, H. Altug, and Y. Kivshar, Spectral tuning of high-harmonic generation with resonance-gradient metasurfaces, Advanced Materials36, 2307494 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Zubyuk, L

    V. Zubyuk, L. Carletti, M. Shcherbakov, and S. Kruk, Resonant dielectric metasur- faces in strong optical fields, APL Materials9(2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    S. Kim, J. Jin, Y.-J. Kim, I.-Y. Park, Y. Kim, and S.-W. Kim, High-harmonic gener- ation by resonant plasmon field enhancement, Nature453, 757 (2008)

    2008

  11. [19]

    Sivis, M

    M. Sivis, M. Duwe, B. Abel, and C. Ropers, Extreme-ultraviolet light generation in plasmonic nanostructures, Science340, 164 (2013). 16

    2013

  12. [20]

    Sivis, M

    M. Sivis, M. Taucer, J. Aguirre, N. Yoshikawa, A. Erfanian, I. De Leon, C. Ropers, and R. W. Boyd, Tailored high-harmonic generation by plasmonic nanostructures, Nature541, 466 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Park, Y.-M

    I.-Y. Park, Y.-M. Kim, J. Choi, D.-H. Lee, J. Kim, M. F. Kling, M. I. Stockman, and S.-W. Kim, Plasmonic nanoantennas for intense field enhancement, Nature Photonics 5, 677 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    H¨ uttner, I

    A. H¨ uttner, I. Bertelli, A. R¨ ottger, N. Pfullmann, K. I. Willig, C. Lienau, and M. Sivis, Plasmonic metasurfaces for strong-field and high-harmonic generation, ACS Photonics 8, 2708 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Y. S. Youet al., High-harmonic generation from plasmonic metasurfaces with con- trolled near-field localization, Physical Review Letters130, 1 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Tonkaev, F

    P. Tonkaev, F. Lai, S. Kruk, Q. Song, M. Scalora, K. Koshelev, and Y. Kivshar, Even-order optical harmonics generated from centrosymmetric-material metasurfaces, Physical Review Research6, 033073 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Mathew, R

    A. Mathew, R. Aschwanden, A. Tripathi, P. Jangid, B. Sain, T. Zentgraf, and S. Kruk, Nonreciprocal metasurfaces with epsilon-near-zero materials, Nano Letters25, 3259 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Tripathi, C

    A. Tripathi, C. F. Ugwu, V. S. Asadchy, I. Faniayeu, I. Kravchenko, S. Fan, Y. Kivshar, J. Valentine, and S. S. Kruk, Nanoscale optical nonreciprocity with nonlinear meta- surfaces, Nature Communications15, 5077 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    J. King, C. Wan, T. J. Park, S. Deshpande, Z. Zhang, S. Ramanathan, and M. A. Kats, Electrically tunable VO2–metal metasurface for mid-infrared switching, limiting and nonlinear isolation, Nature Photonics18, 74 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Cotrufo, A

    M. Cotrufo, A. Cordaro, D. L. Sounas, A. Polman, and A. Al` u, Passive bias-free non-reciprocal metasurfaces based on thermally nonlinear quasi-bound states in the continuum, Nature Photonics18, 81 (2024). 17

    2024

  21. [29]

    S. S. Kruk, L. Wang, B. Sain, Z. Dong, J. Yang, T. Zentgraf, and Y. Kivshar, Asym- metric parametric generation of images with nonlinear dielectric metasurfaces, Nature Photonics16, 561 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Boroviks, A

    S. Boroviks, A. Kiselev, K. Achouri, and O. J. Martin, Demonstration of a plasmonic nonlinear pseudodiode, Nano Letters23, 3362 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    V. S. Asadchy, A. D´ ıaz-Rubio, and S. A. Tretyakov, Bianisotropic metasurfaces: physics and applications, Nanophotonics7, 1069 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Alaee, M

    R. Alaee, M. Albooyeh, A. Rahimzadegan, M. S. Mirmoosa, Y. S. Kivshar, and C. Rockstuhl, All-dielectric reciprocal bianisotropic nanoparticles, Physical Review B92, 245130 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Alaeian, R

    H. Alaeian, R. Ritter, M. Basic, R. L¨ ow, and T. Pfau, Cavity QED based on room temperature atoms interacting with a photonic crystal cavity: a feasibility study, Applied Physics B126, 25 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Srinivasan, M

    K. Srinivasan, M. Borselli, O. Painter, A. Stintz, and S. Krishna, Cavity Q, mode volume, and lasing threshold in small diameter AlGaAs microdisks with embedded quantum dots, Optics Express14, 1094 (2006)

    2006

  27. [35]

    Alaee, C

    R. Alaee, C. Rockstuhl, and I. Fernandez-Corbaton, An electromagnetic multipole expansion beyond the long-wavelength approximation, Optics Communications407, 17 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Gladyshev, K

    S. Gladyshev, K. Frizyuk, and A. Bogdanov, Symmetry analysis and multipole clas- sification of eigenmodes in electromagnetic resonators for engineering their optical properties, Physical Review B102, 075103 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Pascale, G

    M. Pascale, G. Miano, R. Tricarico, and C. Forestiere, Full-wave electromagnetic modes and hybridization in nanoparticle dimers, Scientific reports9, 14524 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Bernal Arango, T

    F. Bernal Arango, T. Coenen, and A. F. Koenderink, Underpinning hybridization intuition for complex nanoantennas by magnetoelectric quadrupolar polarizability re- 18 trieval, ACS Photonics1, 444 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    Mun and J

    J. Mun and J. Rho, Importance of higher-order multipole transitions on chiral nearfield interactions, Nanophotonics8, 941 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Proust, N

    J. Proust, N. Bonod, J. Grand, and B. Gallas, Optical monitoring of the magneto- electric coupling in individual plasmonic scatterers, ACS Photonics3, 1581 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Poleva, K

    M. Poleva, K. Frizyuk, K. Baryshnikova, A. Evlyukhin, M. Petrov, and A. Bogdanov, Multipolar theory of bianisotropic response of meta-atoms, Physical Review B107, L041304 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Cannata, J.-P

    F. Cannata, J.-P. Dedonder, and A. Ventura, Scattering in pt-symmetric quantum mechanics, Annals of Physics322, 397 (2007)

    2007

  35. [43]

    Prada-Rodrigo, Y

    J. Prada-Rodrigo, Y. Di Maio, N. Faure, E. Kachan, J. Colombier, and X. Sedao, Influence of the wavelength on femtosecond laser ablation thresholds and incubation coefficients of silicon and germanium, Journal of Laser Micro/Nanoengineering19 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Zhang, K

    W. Zhang, K. Wang, J. Bai, and Z. Ren, Interaction between femtosecond laser and silicon nitride crystal film, in4th International Symposium on Advanced Optical Manu- facturing and Testing Technologies: Design, Manufacturing, and Testing of Micro-and Nano-Optical Devices and S...

    2009

  37. [45]

    A. J. Qviller, E. S. Marstein, C. C. You, H. Haug, J. R. Webster, B. Hj¨ orvarsson, C. Frommen, and B. C. Hauback, Hydrogen concentration in photovoltaic a-Si: H annealed at different temperatures measured by neutron reflectometry, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics8, 1098 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    P. Dani, M. Tuchen, B. Meli, J. Franz, and J. Knoch, Release of hydrogen gas from PECVD silicon nitride thin films in cavities of MEMS sensors, Micro and Nano Engi- neering25, 100291 (2024). 19

    2024

  39. [47]

    Poruba, J

    A. Poruba, J. Springer, L. Mullerova, A. Beitlerova, M. Vanˇ eˇ cek, N. Wyrsch, and A. Shah, Temperature dependence of the optical absorption coefficient of microcrys- talline silicon, Journal of Non-crystalline Solids338, 222 (2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    Sarantseva, M

    T. Sarantseva, M. Frolov, N. Manakov, A. Silaev, A. Romanov, N. Vvedenskii, and A. F. Starace, Attosecond-pulse metrology based on high-order harmonic generation, Physical Review A101, 013402 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    A. S. Johnson, D. R. Austin, D. A. Wood, C. Brahms, A. Gregory, K. B. Holzner, S. Jarosch, E. W. Larsen, S. Parker, C. S. Str¨ uber,et al., High-flux soft X-ray harmonic generation from ionization-shaped few-cycle laser pulses, Science Advances4, eaar3761 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    forward” and “backward

    Y. Fu, K. Nishimura, R. Shao, A. Suda, K. Midorikawa, P. Lan, and E. J. Takahashi, High efficiency ultrafast water-window harmonic generation for single-shot soft X-ray spectroscopy, Communications Physics3, 92 (2020). 0 2 4 6 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 Wavelength (μm) 0 0.4 0.8 ...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.