Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 65 references

Magnetic Field Control of the N\'eel Vector and Magnon Visibility in Altermagnetic MnTe

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A small magnetic field reorients MnTe's Néel vector and changes which magnons a neutron sees, without shifting their energies or lifetimes.

desk verdict Clean neutron + LSWT result: modest in-plane fields reorient the Néel vector in MnTe while leaving chiral magnon energies and linewidths intact; intensity changes are geometric (transverse projector). read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08829 v1 pith:WWV2KJNW submitted 2026-07-09 cond-mat.str-el

Tobias Weber , Niclas Heinsdorf , Shane Smolenski , Sawyer Beltz , Alexandre Ivanov , Andrea Piovano , Victor Mecoli , Sean Knapp
show 6 more authors
Ruiqi Tang Amir Henderson A. K. M. Ashiquzzaman Shawon Taylor Pierce-James Na Hyun Jo Denis Karaiskaj
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 75.30.Ds29.30.Hs
keywords altermagnetismMnTeNéelvectorchiralmagnonsinelasticneutronscatteringlinearspin-wavetheorytransversedynamicalstructurefactorreconfigurablemagnonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Altermagnetic MnTe hosts chiral magnons whose frequencies are fixed by strong exchange, yet its Néel vector is only weakly pinned by crystal anisotropy. This paper shows, by inelastic neutron scattering and linear spin-wave theory, that modest in-plane fields continuously rotate that vector. The rotation leaves magnon energies and linewidths resolution-limited and unchanged, but alters the transverse projector that governs how strongly neutrons couple to the modes, producing a clear intensity rise that saturates near 1.5 T. The result is a practical separation: the soft orientational degree of freedom can be field-tuned while the exchange-dominated chiral spectrum stays intact. A sympathetic reader cares because that separation supplies a route to reconfigurable magnon coupling—switching which polarized probe talks to which branch—without retuning frequencies or sacrificing coherence.

What carries the argument

The transverse projector of the dynamical structure factor, S⊥_xy(Q,E)=(δ_xy-Q_x Q_y/Q^{2})·S_xy(Q,E), which converts a field-driven rotation of the Néel vector into a change in neutron-visible intensity while the underlying exchange spectrum stays fixed.

What would settle it

Measure the same (h0l) magnon branch at fixed Q under fields that reverse or re-pin domains unequally; if the intensity rise fails to track the calculated transverse weight or the peak energies shift outside resolution, the claimed separation collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

An in-plane magnetic field reorients the Néel vector of altermagnetic α-MnTe by overcoming weak crystalline anisotropy while remaining far below the dominant exchange scale; the reorientation leaves magnon energies and linewidths essentially unchanged but strongly modifies the measured spectral intensity through the transverse-momentum projection.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the magnetic ground state stays collinear and that the six zero-field domains are equally populated when the measured intensity is averaged.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fixed-frequency magnonic logic or routing can switch coupling to chiral branches by rotating the Néel vector alone.
  • Resonant or interference-based circuits need not retune downstream components when the field is changed.
  • Transport devices can exploit strain or interfaces to break residual g-wave cancellation while keeping the magnon splitting and linewidths intact.
  • External polarized probes can be field-tuned without degrading magnon coherence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same soft-hard separation should appear in other light-element g-wave altermagnets once their anisotropy is weaker than exchange.
  • Interface or strain engineering that further lowers the anisotropy barrier could push the intensity-switch threshold well below 1 T.
  • Combining field control of orientation with optical or spin-current detection would test whether the transverse-projector effect generalizes beyond neutrons.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports inelastic neutron scattering and linear spin-wave theory on altermagnetic α-MnTe under in-plane magnetic fields. Using the Heisenberg model of Liu et al. plus a Zeeman term, the authors show that fields of a few tesla reorient the Néel vector by overcoming the weak single-ion anisotropy while remaining far below the dominant exchange scale. The measured magnon energies and resolution-limited line widths on both the spin-split (1.67 0 l) and degenerate (1.5 0 l) branches remain essentially unchanged, whereas the integrated spectral intensity rises by up to ~20 % and saturates near 1.5 T. Resolution-convolved calculations with a single global intensity scale reproduce the data; the intensity change is accounted for by the transverse projector of the dynamical structure factor once the field-dependent orientation of L is included, while a fixed-L calculation produces a field-dependent dispersion that is absent from experiment. The authors conclude that the soft orientational degree of freedom of the Néel vector is cleanly separated from the robust exchange-dominated chiral magnon spectrum, positioning MnTe as a platform for reconfigurable magnon coupling.

Significance. If the result holds, it supplies a concrete experimental demonstration that modest laboratory fields can reorient the altermagnetic order parameter of MnTe without detuning the chiral magnon frequencies, spin splitting, or coherence. That separation is directly relevant to proposed magnonic logic or routing schemes that rely on fixed-frequency, phase-matched operation. Strengths include the use of independently determined exchange parameters (only a global intensity scale is free), explicit comparison of projected versus unprojected spectral weight (Fig. 5a), the falsifying fixed-L calculation (Fig. 5b), and resolution-convolved spectra that match both split and unsplit branches. The work therefore advances altermagnetic magnonics from band-structure observation toward field-tunable device concepts.

minor comments (5)
  1. Sec. II and Table I: the classical ground-state search is restricted to collinear configurations and the six zero-field domains are assumed equally populated for the resolution convolution. While the data (intensity saturation matching the projector, absence of the fixed-L dispersion shift) make large deviations unlikely, a short quantitative estimate of residual canting or of the effect of unequal domain populations would strengthen the claim.
  2. Figs. 3 and 4: the black horizontal bars indicating coherent and incoherent resolution widths are useful but small; enlarging them or adding a numerical inset would help readers judge the resolution-limited character of the peaks more quickly.
  3. Sec. III: the mosaic spread of the co-aligned assembly (~2.6° FWHM) is stated once; repeating it when discussing line widths would make clear that the observed broadening is extrinsic.
  4. Eq. (1): the exchange paths J10 and J11 are described as the shortest inversion-breaking bonds, but a brief reminder of their geometric distinction (or a reference to the corresponding figure panel) would aid readers unfamiliar with the prior work.
  5. Discussion: the device-oriented paragraph is clear, yet a single sentence quantifying the expected change in coupling efficiency for a polarized injector would make the reconfigurability claim more concrete.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: independent exchange model plus geometric projector fully accounts for the new field-dependent intensities without fitting the claimed effect.

full rationale

The Heisenberg exchanges, anisotropy and zero-field ground state are taken unchanged from the independent prior neutron study of Liu et al. (Ref. [46]). Linear spin-wave theory is then used only to (i) minimize the classical energy under an in-plane Zeeman term, yielding the continuous reorientation of L listed in Table I, and (ii) evaluate the transverse projector of Eq. (3). The resulting projected spectral weight (solid red curve in Fig. 5a) reproduces the measured intensity rise and its saturation above ~1.5 T; the unprojected S_xy remains flat. A control calculation that freezes L produces a visibly field-dependent dispersion (Fig. 5b) that is absent from the data, confirming that the observed field-independence of energies and linewidths is a genuine consequence of the reorientation rather than an input. The sole free parameter in the entire comparison is a global intensity scale. No self-definitional loop, no fitted quantity re-labeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz imported via overlapping authorship appear in the derivation chain. The central claim is therefore independently constrained by the new field-dependent measurements.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a previously published Heisenberg Hamiltonian (five exchange constants plus single-ion anisotropy), the validity of linear spin-wave theory without self-energy corrections, restriction to collinear classical ground states, equal domain populations at zero field, and the geometric transverse projector of neutron scattering. Only an overall intensity scale is adjusted to the present data; no new microscopic parameters are fitted.

free parameters (1)
  • global intensity scale factor = adjusted once per data set
    Single free multiplicative constant converting theoretical dynamical structure factor to measured counts; all other microscopic parameters taken from prior work.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Heisenberg Hamiltonian of Ref. [46] with fixed J1–J11 and A accurately describes the magnon spectrum of α-MnTe
    Adopted without refitting in Sec. II; all subsequent field-dependent calculations inherit these values.
  • domain assumption Linear spin-wave theory without magnon–magnon self-energy corrections is adequate
    Used throughout Secs. II–IV; justified a posteriori by resolution-limited experimental linewidths.
  • domain assumption Classical ground states remain collinear under the applied fields
    Explicit restriction stated in Sec. II before energy minimization that produces Table I.
  • ad hoc to paper Zero-field magnetic domains are equally populated
    Assumed when averaging the three effective domains for resolution convolution (Sec. III).
  • standard math Neutron intensity is given by the transverse projector S⊥xy = (δxy − QxQy/Q2) Sxy
    Standard neutron-scattering identity (Eq. 3) used to explain the field-dependent intensity rise.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic Field Control of the N\'eel Vector and Magnon Visibility in Altermagnetic MnTe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WWV2KJNW

@misc{pith2026260708829,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic Field Control of the N\'eel Vector and Magnon Visibility in Altermagnetic MnTe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WWV2KJNW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08829}
}
abstract

Altermagnetic order gives rise to momentum-dependent spin splitting of electronic and magnonic excitations even in the absence of a net magnetization. Here, we investigate the magnetic field dependence of the spin-wave spectrum of altermagnetic $\alpha$-MnTe using inelastic neutron scattering and linear spin-wave theory. An in-plane magnetic field continuously reorients the N\'eel vector by overcoming the weak crystalline anisotropy, while remaining small compared with the dominant exchange scale. We find that this reorientation leaves the magnon energies and line widths essentially unchanged, but strongly modifies the measured spectral intensity through the transverse-momentum projection. Our results demonstrate a clear separation between the soft orientational degree of freedom of the antiferromagnetic order and the robust exchange-dominated chiral magnon spectrum. This combination establishes $\alpha$-MnTe as a platform for reconfigurable magnon coupling, in which external fields tune how excitations interact with polarized probes without substantially altering their frequency or coherence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08829 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) and (b) Magnetic model for MnTe [46] showing only the magnetically active Mn sites in fractional coordinates (blue and red spheres) as well as the spin orientation (blue and red arrows) for (a) B = 0 T and (b) B = 2.5 T, viewing along the [100] direction. The inset shows the orientation of the Néel vector relative to the magnetic field in more detail. Antiferromagnetic couplings, J1, J3, are shown in red and tur… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The co-aligned sample used for inelastic neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Field dependence of the Q = (1.67, 0, l) magnon dispersion of MnTe. Panel (a) shows the theoretical dispersion from the linear spin-wave model, which we based on [46], at zero field (blue curves) and at B = 2.5 T (red curves). The individual scan positions along the l direction are indicated as gray vertical bars. Panels (b)-(f) show the scan data for 0 T and 2.5 T (points) and instrumental resolution-convolutions o… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Field dependence of the Q = (1.5, 0, l) magnon dispersion of MnTe. Panel (a) shows the theoretical dispersion from the linear spin-wave model, which we based on [46], at zero field (blue curves) and at B = 2.5 T (red curves). The individual scan positions along the l d…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Integrated intensity of the experimentally mea [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Con- ventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Re- search Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Šmejkal, A

    L. Šmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous hall antiferromagnets, Na- ture Reviews Materials7, 482 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Šmejkal, B

    L. Šmejkal, B. A. Hellenes, R. González-Hernández, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and Tunneling Mag- netoresistance in Unconventional Collinear Antiferro- magnets with Nonrelativistic Spin-Momentum Coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    González-Hernández, L

    R. González-Hernández, L. Šmejkal, K. Výborný, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J. Železný, Ef- ficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativis- tic Collinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Na- ture Communications12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-Group Symmetry in Magnetic Materials with Negligible Spin- Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 021016 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Bottom-up de- sign of spin-split and reshaped electronic band structures in antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling: Proce- dure on the basis of augmented multipoles, Physical Re- view B102, 144441 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    S.Hayami, Y.Yanagi,andH.Kusunose,Spontaneousan- tisymmetric spin splitting in noncollinear antiferromag- nets without spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review B101, 220403 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic an- tiferromagnets, Nature Communications10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Predic- tion of low-Z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review Mate- rials5, 014409 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Reichlová, R

    H. Reichlová, R. L. Seeger, R. González-Hernández, I. Kounta, R. Schlitz, D. Kriegner, P. Ritzinger, M. Lam- mel, M. Leiviskä, V. Petříček, P. Doležal, E. Schmoranze- rová, A. Bad’Ura, A. Thomas, V. Baltz, L. Michez, J. Sinova, S. Goennenwein, T. Jungwirth, and L. Šme- jkal, M...

    2012 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Šmejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneousHalleffectincollinearantiferromagnets,Sci- ence Advances6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    M. M. Hirschmann, A. Leonhardt, B. Kilic, D. H. Fabini, and A. P. Schnyder, Symmetry-enforced band crossings in tetragonal materials: Dirac and weyl degeneracies on points, lines, and planes, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 054202 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Leonhardt, M

    A. Leonhardt, M. M. Hirschmann, N. Heinsdorf, X. Wu, D. H. Fabini, and A. P. Schnyder, Symmetry-enforced topological band crossings in orthorhombic crystals: Classification and materials discovery, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 124202 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    M. A. Wilde, M. Dodenhöft, A. Niedermayr, A. Bauer, M. M. Hirschmann, K. Alpin, A. P. Schnyder, and C. Pfleiderer, Symmetry-enforced topological nodal planes at the fermi surface of a chiral magnet, Nature 594, 374 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Alpin, M

    K. Alpin, M. M. Hirschmann, N. Heinsdorf, A. Leon- hardt, W. Y. Yau, X. Wu, and A. P. Schnyder, Funda- mental laws of chiral band crossings: Local constraints, global constraints, and topological phase diagrams, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043165 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Shang, O

    C. Shang, O. Ganter, N. Heinsdorf, and S. M. Winter, IrF4: From tetrahedral compass model to topological 8 semimetal, Phys. Rev. B107, 125111 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Oudah, H.-H

    M. Oudah, H.-H. Kung, S. Sahu, N. Heinsdorf, A. Schulz, K. Philippi, M.-V. De Toro Sanchez, Y. Cai, K. Ko- jima, A. P. Schnyder, H. Takagi, B. Keimer, D. A. Bonn, and A. M. Hallas, Discovery of superconductiv- ity and electron-phonon drag in the non-centrosymmetric Weyl semime...

    2024

  13. [21]

    Heinsdorf, Altermagnetic instabilities from quantum geometry, Phys

    N. Heinsdorf, Altermagnetic instabilities from quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. B111, 174407 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Smolenski, N

    S. Smolenski, N. Mao, D. Zhang, Y. Guo, A. K. M. A. Shawon, M. Xu, E. Downey, T. Musall, M. Yi, W. Xie, C.Jozwiak, A.Bostwick, N.Tamura, E.Rotenberg, L.Li, K. Sun, Y. Zhang, and N. H. Jo, Strain-tunability of the multipolar Berry curvature in altermagnet MnTe (2025), arXiv:250...

    2025

  15. [23]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nature Nanotechnology 11, 231 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Re- views of Modern Physics90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nature Communications12, 7061 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    P. Qin, H. Yan, X. Wang, H. Chen, Z. Meng, J. Dong, M. Zhu, J. Cai, Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Liu, T. Zhang, Z. Zeng, J. Zhang, C. Jiang, and Z. Liu, Room-temperature magnetoresistance in an all- antiferromagnetic tunnel junction, Nature613, 485 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    X. Chen, T. Higo, K. Tanaka, T. Nomoto, H. Tsai, H. Idzuchi, M. Shiga, S. Sakamoto, R. Ando, H. Kosaki, T. Matsuo, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, S. Miwa, and S. Nakatsuji, Octupole-driven magnetoresistance in an antiferromagnetic tunnel junction, Nature613, 490 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Heinsdorf and M

    N. Heinsdorf and M. Franz, Proximitizing altermagnets with conventional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B113, L020501 (2026)

    2026

  21. [29]

    Monkman, J

    K. Monkman, J. Weng, N. Heinsdorf, A. Nocera, Y. Bar- las, and M. Franz, Persistent spin currents in supercon- ducting altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X16, 011057 (2026)

    2026

  22. [30]

    Brinkman and R

    W. Brinkman and R. J. Elliott, Theory of spin-space groups, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Se- ries A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences294, 343 (1966)

    1966

  23. [31]

    D. B. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin groups, Physica 76, 538 (1974)

    1974

  24. [32]

    D. B. Litvin, Spin point groups, Acta Crystallographica Section A: Crystal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crystallography33, 279 (1977)

    1977

  25. [33]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and Represen- tation Theory of Spin Space Groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, J. Li, Y. Liu, and Q. Liu, Spin space group theory and unconventional magnons in collinear magnets, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12366 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin Space Groups: Full Classification and Applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of Spin-Space Groups: Toward a Complete Description of Symmetries of Magnetic Orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Yang, Z.-X

    J. Yang, Z.-X. Liu, and C. Fang, Symmetry invariants and classes of quasiparticles in magnetically ordered sys- tems having weak spin-orbit coupling, Nature Communi- cations15, 10203 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev.120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  31. [39]

    Krempask` y, L

    J. Krempask` y, L. Šmejkal, S. D’souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlířová, F. Alarab, P. Constanti- nou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. Pudelko, R. González- Hernández, B. A. Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlová, Z. Šobáň, G. R. Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sinova, D. Kreigner, J. M...

    2024

  32. [40]

    Y.-P. Zhu, X. Chen, X.-R. Liu, Y. Liu, P. Liu, H. Zha, G. Qu, C. Hong, J. Li, Z. Jiang, X.-M. Ma, Y.-J. Hao, M.-Y. Zhu, W. Liu, M. Zeng, S. Jayaram, M. Lenger, J. Ding, S. Mo, K. Tanaka, M. Arita, Z. Liu, M. Ye, D. Shen, J. Wrachtrup, Y. Huang, R.-H. He, S. Qiao, Q. Liu, and C...

    2024

  33. [41]

    Q. Sun, J. Guo, D. Wang, D. L. Abernathy, W. Tian, and C. Li, Observation of chiral magnon band splitting in altermagnetic hematite, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 186703 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Faure, D

    Q. Faure, D. Bounoua, V. Balédent, A. Gukasov, V. O. Garlea, A. Ribeiro, J. G. Rau, S. Petit, and P. McClarty, Altermagnetism revealed by polarized neutrons in MnF2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07087 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    N. Dale, O. A. Ashour, M. Vila, R. B. Regmi, J. Fox, C. W. Johnson, E. S. Barnard, A. Fedorov, A. Stibor, N. J. Ghimire, and S. M. Griffin, Relativistic and non- relativistic spin splitting above and below the fermi level in ag-wave altermagnet (2026), arXiv:2411.18761 [cond- ...

    2026

  36. [44]

    A. K. Singh, N. Heinsdorf, A. A. Mancilla, J. Bannies, A. Maity, A. I. Kolesnikov, M. Matsuda, M. B. Stone, M. Franz, J. Gaudet, and A. M. Hallas, Coherent high- velocity chiral magnons in the metallic altermagnet crsb (2026), arXiv:2511.16086 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2026 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Sears, V

    J. Sears, V. O. Garlea, D. Lederman, J. M. Tranquada, and I. A. Zaliznyak, Altermagnetic and Dipolar Splitting ofMagnonsinFeF 2,Phys.Rev.Lett.136,226701(2026)

    2026

  38. [46]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chiral Split Magnon in Altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156702 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    K. Y. Povarov, J. Wosnitza, S. Rößler, M. Schmidt, A. A. Tsirlin, and S. A. Zvyagin, Low-energy magnons in the altermagnetα-MnTe (2025), arXiv:2510.24376 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2025

  40. [48]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B109, 115102 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Z. Liu, H. Kikuchi, Z. Wei, S. Asai, M. Enderle, U. B. Hansen, V. O. Garlea, M. D. Le, G. J. Nilsen, I. A. Za- liznyak, and T. Masuda, Observation of Switchable Chi- ral Magnons in an Altermagnet, Physical Review Letters 136, 10.1103/m8lc-f8gk (2026)

    2026 doi

  42. [50]

    Toth and B

    S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single-Q incommensurate magnetic structures, Journal of Physics: 9 Condensed Matter27, 166002 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    Minikayev, E

    R. Minikayev, E. Dynowska, B. Witkowska, A. M. T. Bell, and W. Szuszkiewicz, Unit-cell dimensions ofα- MnTe in the 295 K - 1200 K temperature range, X-Ray Spectrometry44, 394 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Kriegner, H

    D. Kriegner, H. Reichlova, J. Grenzer, W. Schmidt, E. Ressouche, J. Godinho, T. Wagner, S. Y. Martin, A. B. Shick, V. V. Volobuev, G. Springholz, V. Holý, J. Wunderlich, T. Jungwirth, and K. Výborný, Magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetic hexagonal MnTe, Phys. Rev. B96, 2144...

    2017

  45. [53]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nature Physics11, 453 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    Shirane, S

    G. Shirane, S. M. Shapiro, and J. M. Tranquada,Neu- tron scattering with a triple-axis spectrometer: basic tech- niques(Cambridge University Press, 2002)

    2002

  47. [55]

    P. C. Canfield, T. Kong, U. S. Kaluarachchi, and N. H. Jo, Use of frit-disc crucibles for routine and exploratory solution growth of single crystalline samples, Philosoph- ical Magazine96, 84 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    T. J. Slade and P. C. Canfield, Use of refractory-volatile element deep eutectic regions to grow single crystalline intermetallic compounds, Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie648, e202200145 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    York, OrientExpress: A new system for Laue neu- tron diffraction, Physica B: Condensed Matter385-386, 1052 (2006)

    B.Ouladdiaf, J.Archer, G.McIntyre, A.Hewat, D.Brau, and S. York, OrientExpress: A new system for Laue neu- tron diffraction, Physica B: Condensed Matter385-386, 1052 (2006)

    2006

  50. [58]

    Piovano and A

    A. Piovano and A. Ivanov, The TAS-IN8 upgrade: To- wards the limit of a three-axis spectrometer performance, EPJ Web Conf.286, 03011 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Popovici, On the resolution of slow-neutron spectrom- eters

    M. Popovici, On the resolution of slow-neutron spectrom- eters. IV. The triple-axis spectrometer resolution func- tion, spatial effects included, Acta Crystallographica Sec- tion A31, 507 (1975)

    1975

  52. [60]

    Takin: Anopen-sourcesoftware for experiment planning, visualisation, and data anal- ysis, (PII: S2352711016300152)

    T.Weber,Update2.5to“Takin: Anopen-sourcesoftware for experiment planning, visualisation, and data anal- ysis, (PII: S2352711016300152)”, SoftwareX23, 101471 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Weber, Magpie (magnon calculation software) (2026), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16180814

    T. Weber, Magpie (magnon calculation software) (2026), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16180814

    2026 doi

  54. [62]

    Weber, N

    T. Weber, N. Heinsdorf, M. Stekiel, P. Steffens, A. P. Schnyder, and C. Pfleiderer, Nonreciprocal zone bound- ary magnon propagation inCu 2OSeO3, Phys. Rev. B 113, L020414 (2026)

    2026

  55. [63]

    Lei, R.-C

    Y. Lei, R.-C. Xiao, W. Lin, and T. Yu, Vector magnonics: Electrical injection and control of spin flow in altermag- nets (2026), arXiv:2605.01225 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2026 arXiv

  56. [64]

    K. D. Belashchenko, Giant Strain-Induced Spin Splitting Effect in MnTe, ag-Wave Altermagnetic Semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 086701 (2025)

    2025

  57. [65]

    Weber, Data analysis for ILL experiments #4-01-1868 and #4-01-1911 (2026), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20623007

    T. Weber, Data analysis for ILL experiments #4-01-1868 and #4-01-1911 (2026), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20623007

    1911 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.