Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 1 cited by

Comprehensive identifiability analysis and reliable parameter estimation for an SEIR model

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The classical SEIR model is only locally identifiable; a reparameterised UVY system is globally identifiable and recovers the true rates reliably.

desk verdict Clean algebraic fix for SEIR non-identifiability that also removes the wrong attractor and numerical overflow in practice. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09137 v1 pith:NISC7LMW submitted 2026-07-10 stat.ME q-bio.PEq-bio.QM

Eduard Campillo-Funollet , James Van Yperen This is my paper
classification stat.MEq-bio.PEq-bio.QM MSC 92D3034A5562F10
keywords SEIRmodelstructuralidentifiabilityparameterestimationobservationalsystemglobalreparameterisationsensitivityequationsepidemiologicalforecasting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Fitting the standard SEIR model to infectious-case data routinely fails because the incubation and infectious rates can be swapped and still produce identical trajectories. The paper proves this non-uniqueness completely by deriving an observational ODE whose coefficients are the only globally identifiable combinations of the original parameters. From those combinations it constructs a change of variables (the UVY system) that is globally identifiable, numerically well-conditioned, and free of the swap ambiguity. Numerical experiments show that the reformulation converges far more often, avoids solver crashes, and recovers the correct unordered pair of rates; adding the first-order sensitivity equations further raises success rates and speeds recovery. The practical consequence is that forecasts and theoretical conclusions drawn from SEIR fits can be made trustworthy once the model is written in the UVY coordinates.

What carries the argument

The observational system: a single higher-order ODE for the observed infectious trajectory whose coefficients are precisely the globally identifiable combinations of the SEIR rates; these coefficients then dictate the change of variables that produces the globally identifiable UVY model.

What would settle it

Generate continuous synthetic SEIR trajectories with known (α, γ) far from each other, fit both the original SEIR and the UVY systems from many random starts, and check whether UVY recovers the correct unordered pair while SEIR still converges predominantly to the swapped pair.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

From continuous noise-free observations of the infectious compartment alone, the SEIR parameters and initial conditions are only locally identifiable: exactly two discrete solutions exist, related by the interchange of the incubation and infectious rates together with a corresponding rescaling of the susceptible and exposed compartments. The globally identifiable quantities are the elementary symmetric combinations c1 = α + γ, c2 = β_N and c3 = αγ; rewriting the dynamics in the scaled variables u = γ^{-1}S, v = γ^{-1}(E + I), y = I yields a UVY system whose every parameter is globally identifiable and whose solutions recover the original rates up to order.

Load-bearing premise

The entire identifiability analysis assumes continuous, noise-free observations of the infectious compartment and of its time derivatives; real epidemic data are discrete and noisy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any optimisation routine that fits the classical SEIR equations to I(t) data will, for most initial guesses, return the swapped rates rather than the true rates.
  • The effective reproduction number Rt = β_N S / γ remains globally identifiable even when S itself and the separate rates are not.
  • Replacing SEIR by the UVY system removes the local-minimum trap and the associated numerical stiffness, raising reliable convergence from near zero to roughly 80-90 percent.
  • Adding the analytic first-order sensitivity equations to the UVY optimiser further improves both success rate and wall-clock time to a correct fit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same observational-system construction should produce globally identifiable reparameterisations for other common compartmental models (SEIRS, SEIRD, age-structured SEIR) once the observable is fixed.
  • Because Rt is globally identifiable while the separate rates are not, any forecasting pipeline that only needs Rt can safely ignore the swap ambiguity without reparameterisation.
  • The open statistical question left by the paper—how many discrete noisy observations are required before the two local solutions become practically distinguishable—can be answered by a Monte-Carlo study that systematically thins continuous trajectories and adds measurement noise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper performs a structural identifiability analysis of the classical SEIR system observed through the infectious compartment I(t). By successive differentiation and elimination it derives the third-order observational ODE (12) whose coefficients are the elementary symmetric combinations c1=α+γ, c2=β_N and c3=αγ; these are therefore globally identifiable, while α and γ themselves remain only locally identifiable. The two discrete pre-images (15a)–(15b) are characterised explicitly, and a change of variables produces the globally identifiable UVY system (19)–(21). Monte-Carlo experiments with 10^6 random starts, several optimisers and first-order sensitivity equations demonstrate that the reparameterisation removes dual attractors, eliminates numerical overflow and recovers the correct unordered pair {α,γ} with high reliability.

Significance. SEIR models remain the workhorse of epidemic forecasting, yet practitioners routinely encounter non-unique and stiff fits. The algebraic characterisation of the two local solutions, the explicit globally identifiable reparameterisation, and the reproducible numerical evidence that the reformulation both converges more often and avoids overflow constitute a concrete, immediately usable advance. The derivation is fully rigorous under the classical continuous noise-free setting, the dual solutions are given in closed form, and the computational experiments are large-scale and multi-algorithm; these strengths make the work a solid contribution to the methodological literature on epidemic parameter estimation.

minor comments (4)
  1. The abstract and introduction repeatedly speak of “reciprocal transmission, incubation and infectious rates”; a single clarifying sentence that β_N, α and γ are rates (not periods) would remove a possible source of confusion for readers outside mathematical epidemiology.
  2. In Section 3.2 the authors note that alternative globally identifiable bases (e.g. β_N(α+γ), β_N α γ) exist and leave the question of the “best” choice open. A short remark on why the elementary-symmetric choice (14) was preferred for the subsequent numerical work would strengthen the presentation.
  3. Figure 1 caption and the surrounding text use both “minimiser” and “parameter set”; consistent terminology would improve readability.
  4. The final paragraph of the Discussion correctly flags discrete noisy data as future work; a single sentence quantifying how many observation points were used in the synthetic experiments (already visible from the least-squares sums) would help readers gauge the gap between the continuous idealisation and the numerical tests.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: structural claims follow from explicit algebraic elimination of the SEIR ODEs; reparameterization and numerics are confirmatory, not definitional.

full rationale

The load-bearing derivation is the construction of the observational system (12) by successive differentiation of y=I and elimination of S and E via (8) and (10). Its coefficients are the elementary symmetric polynomials c1=α+γ, c2=β_N, c3=αγ; global identifiability of those coefficients is the standard consequence of the input-output approach (cited externally to Cunniffe et al. and Bellman-Åström), not a fit or a self-definition. The two discrete pre-images (15a)–(15b) are obtained by the same algebra, and the UVY change of variables (19)–(21) is deliberately built so that those coefficients become the system parameters. The Monte-Carlo experiments (Figs. 1–4) merely verify, on synthetic trajectories generated from known ground truth, that the dual attractors predicted by the algebra appear in practice and disappear under the reparameterization. Self-citations [10,11] record prior use of the same method on related models; they are not invoked as uniqueness theorems that force the present result. No parameter is fitted to data and then re-presented as a prediction, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. The continuous noise-free idealization is an explicit scope limitation stated in the Discussion, not a hidden premise that collapses the derivation. The paper is therefore self-contained against its own algebraic and numerical benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper rests on standard ODE theory and the classical definition of structural identifiability; the only modeling assumptions are the usual mass-action SEIR compartments and the choice of observable (I or kI). No free parameters are fitted to real data; the numerical experiments use known synthetic ground truth. The UVY variables are a derived change of coordinates, not a new physical entity.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Structural identifiability is defined via the implication y(t,p)=y(t,ˆp) ⇒ p=ˆp for continuous noise-free observations (Definition 1).
    Standard definition adapted from Liyanage et al.; used throughout Section 3.
  • domain assumption The SEIR vector field is the classical mass-action system (1)–(4) with constant total population N.
    Taken as the starting point of the entire analysis; no derivation from first principles is claimed.
  • domain assumption The observable is y(t)=I(t) (or a constant multiple kI(t)).
    Stated at the opening of Section 3; alternative observables (cumulative incidence) are noted but not fully treated.
  • standard math Coefficients of the observational differential equation are globally identifiable.
    Invoked after equation (12); classical consequence of the input–output approach.
invented entities (1)
  • UVY reparameterization (u=γ^{-1}S, v=γ^{-1}(E+I), y=I) independent evidence
    purpose: To obtain a dynamically equivalent system whose free coefficients c1,c2,c3 are globally identifiable.
    Derived algebraically from the observational system; not postulated as a new biological compartment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Comprehensive identifiability analysis and reliable parameter estimation for an SEIR model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NISC7LMW

@misc{pith2026260709137,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Comprehensive identifiability analysis and reliable parameter estimation for an SEIR model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NISC7LMW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09137}
}
read the original abstract

The Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Removed (SEIR) model is a fundamental model in epidemiology. Model parameters such as the reciprocal transmission, incubation, and infectious rates are often difficult to measure directly, and they are estimated by solving an optimisation problem aiming to minimise the difference between the observed data and the model solution. However, the parameters of the standard SEIR system are not globally identifiable, causing optimisation algorithms to frequently converge to incorrect local optima and suffer from numerical stiffness. Here we show a comprehensive structural identifiability analysis of the SEIR framework, and present a globally identifiable and computationally stable reparameterisation of the model derived via an observational system approach. We fully characterise the multiple locally identifiable parameters, and by transforming the system into a globally identifiable structure, we eliminate the non-uniqueness issues in the parameter estimation approaches. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that this reformulation significantly improves convergence frequency, avoids runtime errors caused by numerical overflow, and consistently recovers the correct parameters. Furthermore, incorporating first-order sensitivity equations into the optimiser enhances the robustness and execution speed of the estimation process. Numerically well-conditioned methods for parameter identification, together with a comprehensive understanding of the identifiability of the parameters, ensure that the model yields reliable, rigorous insights for infectious disease forecasting and theoretical epidemiology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09137 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Results of the minimisation problem (5). Blue denotes convergence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Results of minimisation problem (24). Top row left: minimiser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Results of the minimisation problems (5) and (24), except not [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results of the minimisation problems (24), including the fitting of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Parameter identification for predator-prey system with sparse data

    stat.ME 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A parameter-estimation framework for Lotka-Volterra models with sparse data, combining Natural Gradient Ascent, non-dimensionalization, and an adaptive ODE solver, claims fewer iterations and more stability than stand...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Data-based analysis, modelling and fore- casting of the covid-19 outbreak.PloS one, 15(3):e0230405, 2020

    Cleo Anastassopoulou, Lucia Russo, Athanasios Tsakris, and Constantinos Siettos. Data-based analysis, modelling and fore- casting of the covid-19 outbreak.PloS one, 15(3):e0230405, 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    Elsevier, 2018

    Richard C Aster, Brian Borchers, and Clifford H Thurber.Pa- rameter estimation and inverse problems. Elsevier, 2018

    2018

  3. [3]

    Audoly, G

    S. Audoly, G. Bellu, L. D’Angio, M.P. Saccomani, and C. Cobelli. Global identifiability of nonlinear models of biological systems. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 48, 2001. doi: 10. 1109/10.900248. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/10.900248

    doi:10.1109/10.900248 2001

  4. [4]

    Bearup, Neil D

    Daniel J. Bearup, Neil D. Evans, and Michael J. Chappell. The input–output relationship approach to structural identifiability analysis.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 109, 2 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.10.012. URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.10.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.10.012 2013

  5. [5]

    On structural identifiabil- ity.Mathematical biosciences, 7(3-4):329–339, 1970

    Ror Bellman and Karl Johan Åström. On structural identifiabil- ity.Mathematical biosciences, 7(3-4):329–339, 1970

    1970

  6. [6]

    Daisy: A new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 88, 10 2007

    Giuseppina Bellu, Maria Pia Saccomani, Stefania Audoly, and Leontina D’Angiò. Daisy: A new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 88, 10 2007. doi: 10. 1016/j.cmpb.2007.07.002. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cmpb.2007.07.002

    doi:10.1016/j 2007

  7. [7]

    Models for influenza

    Fred Brauer, Carlos Castillo-Chavez, and Zhilan Feng. Models for influenza. InMathematical Models in Epidemiology, pages 311–

  8. [8]

    Brouwer, Rafael Meza, and Marisa C

    Andrew F. Brouwer, Rafael Meza, and Marisa C. Eisenberg. A systematic approach to determining the identifiability of multi- stage carcinogenesis models.Risk Analysis, 37, 9 2016. doi: 10.1111/risa.12684. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa. 12684

    work page doi:10.1111/risa.12684 2016

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Origins of the problematic e in seir epidemic models.Infectious Disease Modelling, 9(3):673–679, 2024

    Donald S Burke. Origins of the problematic e in seir epidemic models.Infectious Disease Modelling, 9(3):673–679, 2024. 22

    2024

  2. [10]

    Eduard Campillo-Funollet, James Van Yperen, Phil Allman, Michael Bell, Warren Beresford, Jacqueline Clay, Matthew Dorey, Graham Evans, Kate Gilchrist, Anjum Memon, et al. Predicting and forecasting the impact of local outbreaks of covid-19: use of seir-d quantitative epidemiol...

    2021

  3. [11]

    Reformulating the susceptible–infectious–removed model in terms of the number of detected cases: well-posedness of the observational model.Philo- sophical transactions

    Eduard Campillo-Funollet, Hayley Wragg, James Van Yperen, Duc-Lam Duong, and Anotida Madzvamuse. Reformulating the susceptible–infectious–removed model in terms of the number of detected cases: well-posedness of the observational model.Philo- sophical transactions. Series A, M...

    2022

  4. [12]

    Parameter estimation and un- certainty quantication for an epidemic model.Mathematical bio- sciences and engineering, page 553, 2012

    Alex Capaldi, Samuel Behrend, Benjamin Berman, Jason Smith, Justin Wright, and Alun L Lloyd. Parameter estimation and un- certainty quantication for an epidemic model.Mathematical bio- sciences and engineering, page 553, 2012

    2012

  5. [13]

    Banga, and Eva Balsa-Canto

    Oana-Teodora Chis, Julio R. Banga, and Eva Balsa-Canto. Structural identifiability of systems biology models: A critical comparison of methods.PLoS ONE, 6, 11 2011. doi: 10. 1371/journal.pone.0027755. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0027755

    2011

  6. [14]

    Functional-differential equations: some models and perturbation problems.Differential equations and dynamical systems, pages 167–183, 1967

    Kenneth L Cooke. Functional-differential equations: some models and perturbation problems.Differential equations and dynamical systems, pages 167–183, 1967

    1967

  7. [15]

    Springer, 2024

    Nik Cunniffe, Frédéric Hamelin, Abderrahman Iggidr, Alain Ra- paport, and Gauthier Sallet.Identifiability and Observability in Epidemiological Models. Springer, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Dankwa, Andrew F

    Emmanuelle A. Dankwa, Andrew F. Brouwer, and Christl A. Donnelly. Structural identifiability of compartmental models for infectious disease transmission is influenced by data type.Epi- demics, 41, 12 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100643. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epid...

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    R. Dong, C. Goodbrake, H. Harrington, and Pogudin G. Dif- ferential elimination for dynamical models via projections with 23 applications to structural identifiability.SIAM Journal on Ap- plied Algebra and Geometry, 7(1):194–235, 2023. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1137/22M1469067

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Tracking epidemicswithgoogleflutrendsdataandastate-spaceseirmodel

    Vanja Dukic, Hedibert F Lopes, and Nicholas G Polson. Tracking epidemicswithgoogleflutrendsdataandastate-spaceseirmodel. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107(500):1410– 1426, 2012

    2012

  11. [19]

    Covid-19 and sars-cov-2

    Ernesto Estrada. Covid-19 and sars-cov-2. modeling the present, looking at the future.Physics reports, 869:1–51, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    The structural identifiability of the susceptible infected recovered model with seasonal forcing.Math- ematical biosciences, 194(2):175–197, 2005

    Neil D Evans, Lisa J White, Michael J Chapman, Keith R God- frey, and Michael J Chappell. The structural identifiability of the susceptible infected recovered model with seasonal forcing.Math- ematical biosciences, 194(2):175–197, 2005

    2005

  13. [21]

    Enabling new flexibility in the SUNDIALS suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers.ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 2022

    David J Gardner, Daniel R Reynolds, Carol S Woodward, and Cody J Balos. Enabling new flexibility in the SUNDIALS suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers.ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 2022. doi: 10.1145/3539801

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    Parameter identification in epidemic models.Math- ematical biosciences, 229(2):185–189, 2011

    KP Hadeler. Parameter identification in epidemic models.Math- ematical biosciences, 229(2):185–189, 2011

    2011

  15. [23]

    Harris, K

    Charles R. Harris, K. Jarrod Millman, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Ralf Gommers, Pauli Virtanen, David Cournapeau, Eric Wieser, Julian Taylor, Sebastian Berg, Nathaniel J. Smith, Robert Kern, Matti Picus, Stephan Hoyer, Marten H. van Kerkwijk, Matthew Brett, Allan Haldane, Jaime Fe...

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Sian: software for structural identifiability analysis of ode models

    Hoon Hong, Alexey Ovchinnikov, Gleb Pogudin, and Chee Yap. Sian: software for structural identifiability analysis of ode models. Bioinformatics, 35, 1 2019. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1069. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1069. 24

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    Global identifiability of differential models.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 73, 6 2020

    Hoon Hong, Alexey Ovchinnikov, Gleb Pogudin, and Chee Yap. Global identifiability of differential models.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 73, 6 2020. doi: 10.1002/cpa. 21921. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21921

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    On epi- demic modeling in real time: An application to the 2009 novel a (h1n1) influenza outbreak in canada.BMC Research Notes, 3, 11

    Ying-Hen Hsieh, David N Fisman, and Jianhong Wu. On epi- demic modeling in real time: An application to the 2009 novel a (h1n1) influenza outbreak in canada.BMC Research Notes, 3, 11

    2009

  19. [27]

    URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1756-0500-3-283

    doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-283. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1756-0500-3-283

    doi

  20. [28]

    Global infectious disease early warning models: An updated re- view and lessons from the covid-19 pandemic.Infectious Disease Modelling, 10(2):410–422, 2025

    Wei-Hua Hu, Hui-Min Sun, Yong-Yue Wei, and Yuan-Tao Hao. Global infectious disease early warning models: An updated re- view and lessons from the covid-19 pandemic.Infectious Disease Modelling, 10(2):410–422, 2025

    2025

  21. [29]

    J. D. Hunter. Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment.Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3):90–95, 2007. doi: 10.1109/MCSE. 2007.55

    2007 doi

  22. [30]

    Eisenberg

    Yu-Han Kao and Marisa C. Eisenberg. Practical unidentifia- bility of a simple vector-borne disease model: Implications for parameter estimation and intervention assessment.Epidemics, 25, 12 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2018.05.010. URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2018.05.010

    2018 doi

  23. [31]

    An ef- ficient method for structural identifiability analysis of large dy- namic systems.IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45, 7 2012

    Johan Karlsson, Milena Anguelova, and Mats Jirstrand. An ef- ficient method for structural identifiability analysis of large dy- namic systems.IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45, 7 2012. doi: 10.3182/20120711-3-be-2027.00381. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.3182/20120711-3-be-2027.00381

    2012 doi

  24. [32]

    Genssi 2.0: multi- experiment structural identifiability analysis of sbml models

    Thomas S Ligon, Fabian Fröhlich, Oana T Chiş, Julio R Banga, Eva Balsa-Canto, and Jan Hasenauer. Genssi 2.0: multi- experiment structural identifiability analysis of sbml models. Bioinformatics, 34, 11 2017. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx735. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioi...

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    Z. Liu, P. Magal, O. Seydi, and G. Webb. A covid-19 epidemic model with latency period.Infectious Disease Modelling, 5, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.03.003. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.idm.2020.03.003. 25

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    Liyanage, Omar Saucedo, Necibe Tuncer, and Ger- ardo Chowell

    Yuganthi R. Liyanage, Omar Saucedo, Necibe Tuncer, and Ger- ardo Chowell. A tutorial on structural identifiability of epi- demic models using structuralidentifiability.jl.arXiv, 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2505.10517. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2505.10517

    2025 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    The parameter identification problem for sir epidemic models: identifying unreported cases

    Pierre Magal and Glenn Webb. The parameter identification problem for sir epidemic models: identifying unreported cases. Journal of mathematical biology, 77(6):1629–1648, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    On finding and using identifiable parameter combina- tions in nonlinear dynamic systems biology models and com- bos: A novel web implementation.PLoS ONE, 9, 10 2014

    Nicolette Meshkat, Christine Er-zhen Kuo, and Joseph DiSte- fano. On finding and using identifiable parameter combina- tions in nonlinear dynamic systems biology models and com- bos: A novel web implementation.PLoS ONE, 9, 10 2014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110261. URLhttp://...

    2014 doi

  29. [37]

    In- fluenza—insights from mathematical modelling.Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 106(47):777, 2009

    Rafael Mikolajczyk, Ralf Krumkamp, Reinhard Bornemann, Amena Ahmad, Markus Schwehm, and Hans-Peter Duerr. In- fluenza—insights from mathematical modelling.Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 106(47):777, 2009

    2009

  30. [38]

    Identifiability analysis of an epidemiological model in a structured population.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 374, 2 2011

    Antoine Perasso, Béatrice Laroche, Yacine Chitour, and Suzanne Touzeau. Identifiability analysis of an epidemiological model in a structured population.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 374, 2 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.08.072. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.101...

    2011 doi

  31. [39]

    System identifiability based on the power series expansion of the solution.Mathematical biosciences, 41(1- 2):21–33, 1978

    Hannu Pohjanpalo. System identifiability based on the power series expansion of the solution.Mathematical biosciences, 41(1- 2):21–33, 1978

    1978

  32. [40]

    Extracting the time-dependent transmission rate from infection data via solution of an inverse ode problem.Journal of biological dynamics, 6(2): 509–523, 2012

    Mark Pollicott, Hao Wang, and Howard Weiss. Extracting the time-dependent transmission rate from infection data via solution of an inverse ode problem.Journal of biological dynamics, 6(2): 509–523, 2012

    2012

  33. [41]

    The effect of con- trol strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the covid-19 epidemic in wuhan, china: a modelling study.The Lancet Public Health, 5(5):e261–e270, 2020

    Kiesha Prem, Yang Liu, Timothy W Russell, Adam J Kucharski, Rosalind M Eggo, Nicholas Davies, Stefan Flasche, Samuel Clif- ford, Carl AB Pearson, James D Munday, et al. The effect of con- trol strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the covid-19 epidemic in wuhan, ch...

    2020

  34. [42]

    Comparison of approaches for pa- rameter identifiability analysis of biological systems.Bioinfor- matics, 30, 1 2014

    Andreas Raue, Johan Karlsson, Maria Pia Saccomani, Mats Jirstrand, and Jens Timmer. Comparison of approaches for pa- rameter identifiability analysis of biological systems.Bioinfor- matics, 30, 1 2014. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu006. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinform...

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    Forward-mode automatic differentiation in julia.arXiv, 07 2016

    Jarrett Revels, Miles Lubin, and Theodore Papamarkou. Forward-mode automatic differentiation in julia.arXiv, 07 2016. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1607.07892. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 1607.07892v1

    2016 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Dynamics of infectious diseases.Reports on Progress in Physics, 77(2):026602, 2014

    Kat Rock, Sam Brand, Jo Moir, and Matt J Keeling. Dynamics of infectious diseases.Reports on Progress in Physics, 77(2):026602, 2014

    2014

  37. [45]

    Roda, Marie B

    Weston C. Roda, Marie B. Varughese, Donglin Han, and Michael Y. Li. Why is it difficult to accurately predict the covid-19 epidemic?Infectious Disease Modelling, 5, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.03.001. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.idm.2020.03.001

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    Compara- tive analysis of practical identifiability methods for an seir model

    Omar Saucedo, Amanda Laubmeier, Tingting Tang, Benjamin Levy, Lale Asik, Tim Pollington, and Olivia Prosper. Compara- tive analysis of practical identifiability methods for an seir model. AIMS Mathematics, 9:24722–24761, 2024. doi: 10.3934/math. 20241204

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    A probabilistic algorithm to test local alge- braic observability in polynomial time

    Alexandre Sedoglavic. A probabilistic algorithm to test local alge- braic observability in polynomial time. InProceedings of the 2001 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation, pages 309–317, 2001

    2001

  40. [48]

    Modeling complex systems: a case study of compartmental models in epidemiology.Complexity, 2022(1):3007864, 2022

    Alexander F Siegenfeld, Pratyush K Kollepara, and Yaneer Bar- Yam. Modeling complex systems: a case study of compartmental models in epidemiology.Complexity, 2022(1):3007864, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Global research activity on mathematical modeling of transmission and control of 23 selected infectious dis- ease outbreak.Globalization and health, 18(1):4, 2022

    Waleed M Sweileh. Global research activity on mathematical modeling of transmission and control of 23 selected infectious dis- ease outbreak.Globalization and health, 18(1):4, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    A review of multi- 27 compartment infectious disease models.International Statistical Review, 88(2):462–513, 2020

    Lu Tang, Yiwang Zhou, Lili Wang, Soumik Purkayastha, Leyao Zhang, Jie He, Fei Wang, and Peter X-K Song. A review of multi- 27 compartment infectious disease models.International Statistical Review, 88(2):462–513, 2020

    2020

  43. [51]

    Necibe Tuncer and Trang T. Le. Structural and practical identi- fiability analysis of outbreak models.Mathematical Biosciences, 299, 5 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2018.02.004. URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2018.02.004

    2018 doi

  44. [52]

    Villaverde

    Alejandro F. Villaverde. Observability and structural identifia- bility of nonlinear biological systems.Complexity, 2019, 1 2019. doi: 10.1155/2019/8497093. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ 2019/8497093

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    Villaverde, Antonio Barreiro, and Antonis Pa- pachristodoulou

    Alejandro F. Villaverde, Antonio Barreiro, and Antonis Pa- pachristodoulou. Structural identifiability of dynamic systems biology models.PLOS Computational Biology, 12, 10 2016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005153. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005153

    2016 doi

  46. [54]

    Oliphant, Matt Haber- land, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, Stéfan J

    Pauli Virtanen, Ralf Gommers, Travis E. Oliphant, Matt Haber- land, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Matthew Brett, Joshua Wilson, K. Jarrod Millman, Niko- lay Mayorov, Andrew R. J. Nelso...

  47. [55]

    doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    doi

  48. [56]

    Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python

    Wes McKinney. Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python. In Stéfan van der Walt and Jarrod Millman, editors, Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, pages 56 – 61, 2010. doi: 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a

    2010 doi

  49. [57]

    Joseph T Wu, Kathy Leung, and Gabriel M Leung. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-ncov outbreak originating in wuhan, china: a modelling study.The Lancet, 395(10225):689–697, 2020. 28

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.