Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 85 references

A refined blow-up analysis of the Brezis-Nirenberg equation and its application: The one-bubble case for $N\geq4$

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A complete one-bubble classification for the Brezis-Nirenberg equation yields least-energy sign-changing solutions in four dimensions for every positive λ, including every eigenvalue.

desk verdict Solid classification of one-bubble Struwe profiles that finally settles least-energy sign-changing existence at every eigenvalue for the 4D Brezis-Nirenberg problem. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.11132 v1 pith:N3JVJMDW submitted 2026-07-13 math.AP

Rui He , Xiangqing Liu , Juncheng Wei , Yuanze Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35B3335B4035B4435J15
keywords Brezis-NirenbergequationStruwedecompositionrefinedblow-upanalysissign-changingsolutioninversereductionargumentleastenergycriticalSobolevexponentone-bubblecase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The Brezis-Nirenberg equation is a classic critical-exponent elliptic problem whose existence theory for positive solutions is essentially settled, but whose sign-changing solutions still had gaps at eigenvalues when the dimension is four. This paper supplies a refined blow-up analysis that fully classifies every possible one-bubble Struwe decomposition as the parameter λ approaches any positive limit, including eigenvalues. The classification forces minimizing sequences of least-energy sign-changing solutions to remain compact at every eigenvalue, producing a least-energy nodal solution for every λ > 0 when N = 4. The same analysis recovers the known existence picture for N ≥ 5 and supplies precise concentration rates and locations (interior singular points of eigenfunctions or boundary points). The result closes a forty-year gap in the existence theory for N ≥ 4.

What carries the argument

The refined inverse-reduction expansion of the remainder after projection onto bubble kernels and the eigenspace of the limiting eigenvalue (Propositions 4.1 and 5.2), which produces non-degenerate second- and third-order identities that locate the concentration point and determine the precise vanishing rates of μ_ε and the eigenfunction amplitudes.

What would settle it

Exhibit a smooth bounded domain in dimension 4 and an eigenvalue λ_k for which a least-energy nodal sequence still blows up (energy strictly less than S^{2}/4 yet non-compact), or construct a one-bubble solution whose concentration point and rates violate the singular-point/rate conclusions of Theorems 1.3–1.5.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For N ≥ 4 every solution that blows up with a single bubble and uniformly bounded energy must, after a refined orthogonal decomposition that removes both bubble kernels and eigenfunction projections, concentrate at a singular point of a linear combination of eigenfunctions belonging to the limiting eigenvalue, with explicitly computed rates for the bubble scale μ_ε and the eigenfunction coefficients; when N = 4 the classification implies that least-energy nodal minimizers remain compact at every eigenvalue, yielding a least-energy sign-changing solution for all λ > 0.

Load-bearing premise

The second- and third-order expansions of the orthogonal conditions remain free of unexpected higher-order cancellations involving the eigenfunction projection and the Robin function on every smooth domain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In every smooth bounded domain in R^{4} the Brezis-Nirenberg equation admits a least-energy sign-changing solution for every λ > 0, including every eigenvalue of -Δ.
  • The least-energy function m_sg(λ) is continuous and strictly decreasing on each interval (λ_i, λ_{i+1}], with explicit limits at the endpoints that complete the variational picture.
  • The same classification rules out one-bubble blow-up for N ≥ 6 under the energy bound S^{N/2}, recovering and sharpening known non-existence statements.
  • Precise asymptotic rates (μ_ε o 0 and eigenfunction amplitudes) become available for any future construction or uniqueness argument near eigenvalues.
  • The method supplies a template for classifying one-bubble sign-changing solutions of other critical equations on domains or manifolds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same refined expansion should extend, with only technical changes, to the multi-bubble Struwe decomposition and thereby control higher-energy nodal solutions.
  • Because the classification is local near each concentration point, analogous statements are expected for the Yamabe-type equation on compact manifolds with boundary when the parameter approaches an eigenvalue of the conformal Laplacian.
  • The non-degeneracy of the secondary matrix (1.19) for simple eigenvalues suggests that generic domains admit only the singular-point concentration scenario of Theorem 1.5.
  • The boundary-concentration rates obtained for N = 4 open a concrete route to construct solutions that bubble at the boundary when the eigenfunction changes sign near ∂Ω.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Brezis–Nirenberg equation −Δu=λu+|u|^{4/(N−2)}u in a smooth bounded domain Ω⊂R^N (N≥4). Using a refined inverse-reduction argument, it gives a complete classification of one-bubble Struwe decompositions of solutions with energy at most S^{N/2} as λ approaches a positive limit (Theorems 1.3–1.5). The classification distinguishes interior/boundary concentration, the sign of ε=λ−λ_k, and dimensions N=4,5 versus N≥6, and identifies the concentration point as a singular point of a linear combination of eigenfunctions (or gives precise rates when the point is regular). As an application, the authors prove that for N=4 the equation admits a least-energy sign-changing solution for every λ>0 (Theorem 1.2), including at every eigenvalue λ_k∈σ(−Δ), thereby completing the existence theory for N≥4 that had remained open at eigenvalues since the mid-1980s.

Significance. The existence statement for N=4 at eigenvalues closes a classical gap left open by Capozzi–Fortunato–Palmieri, Cerami–Fortunato–Struwe, Clapp–Weth, Szulkin–Weth–Willem and subsequent works. The refined one-bubble classification (second- and third-order expansions of the orthogonal conditions after successive projections onto bubble kernels and the eigenspace) is of independent interest for critical problems and for sign-changing blow-up analysis on domains and manifolds. The argument is self-contained once the Wang–Wei inverse-reduction framework and the classical non-degeneracy of Aubin–Talenti bubbles are granted; the new expansions and the energy-test-function constructions used in the compactness argument of Section 6 are derived independently of the final existence claim.

minor comments (5)
  1. Abstract and title page: “fist time” should be “first time”; several other minor spelling slips appear (e.g., “the fist time” in the abstract body).
  2. Page 45 (proof of Theorem 1.2, Step 2): the definition of the test function v_ε writes the sum over low modes with an index range that is slightly inconsistent with the subsequent claim that v_ε lies in Y_k; the explicit formula for the coefficients ϱ_{j,l,ε} already cancels those modes, so the construction is correct, but the written range should be aligned with Y_k=⊕_{j≥k+1} Ξ_j for readability.
  3. Throughout Sections 4–5 the constants D_{N,i} are introduced at the moment of use; a short table or a single list in the preliminaries would help the reader track which integral appears in which expansion.
  4. In Theorem 1.3(b2) and the corresponding rate statements, the normal derivative ∂_ν E_0^* is written without an explicit orientation convention; a one-line clarification that ν is the outward unit normal would remove any ambiguity.
  5. References: a few arXiv preprints cited as “to appear” or with only arXiv numbers could be updated if journal versions are already available; this is purely bibliographic.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: classification and existence follow from independent expansions of orthogonal conditions; inverse-reduction framework is a cited technique (partial self-citation via Wei) but not load-bearing for the target claims.

  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract and §1.2 (method statement); citations [85,86]]
    "By developing a refined blow-up analysis based on the inverse reduction argument developed in [85, 86], we classify, for the fist time, the Struwe decomposition..."

    The inverse-reduction framework is taken from Wang–Wei (2019), co-authored by J. Wei. It supplies the initial orthogonal decomposition and remainder equation that the paper then refines. Because the subsequent expansions, location/rate conclusions, and energy contradiction are derived independently from the PDE and classical bubble non-degeneracy, the citation is only a technical starting point and does not force the target existence claim; the circularity is therefore minor.

full rationale

The paper's core results (Theorems 1.3–1.5 classifying one-bubble Struwe decompositions, and Theorem 1.2 on existence of least-energy sign-changing solutions for all λ>0 when N=4) are obtained by successive orthogonal projections onto bubble kernels and eigenspaces, followed by explicit second- and third-order expansions of the resulting conditions (Propositions 4.1 and 5.2) that control all error terms by κ_ε and remainder norms. These expansions are derived directly from the PDE, Green-function asymptotics, and classical non-degeneracy of Aubin–Talenti bubbles (external). The inverse-reduction argument of Wang–Wei is used only as a starting technique and is refined here; the energy-test-function constructions in Section 6 that produce the contradiction for compactness are independent of any prior existence statement at the eigenvalues. No quantity is defined in terms of the claimed output, no parameter is fitted and re-predicted, and no uniqueness theorem is imported to force the conclusion. The single partial self-citation (WW2019) is therefore non-load-bearing technical scaffolding, yielding a score of 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Pure analytic paper. All background results (Sobolev embeddings, Green/Robin asymptotics, non-degeneracy of bubbles, Struwe decomposition, inverse reduction) are standard or previously published. No free parameters are fitted; no new physical or geometric entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Aubin–Talenti bubbles are non-degenerate: the only bounded solutions of the linearized Yamabe equation are the obvious translational and scaling modes.
    Invoked throughout the orthogonal decompositions (Section 1 and Lemma 2.1); classical result of Rey and Bianchi–Egnell.
  • standard math Struwe’s global compactness theorem: bounded Palais–Smale sequences decompose into a solution plus bubbles.
    Used to reduce the problem to the one-bubble case under the energy bound S^{N/2} (display (1.9)).
  • domain assumption The inverse-reduction argument of Wang–Wei yields a remainder whose H^1-norm is larger than the bubble tail away from the concentration point.
    Starting point of the refined analysis (Section 3); taken from the cited works WW2019, WW2019-2.
  • domain assumption The Robin function of a smooth bounded domain admits the standard expansion φ(x)∼(2d(x,∂Ω))^{2−N} near the boundary.
    Used for all boundary-concentration rates (display (2.4) and subsequent estimates).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A refined blow-up analysis of the Brezis-Nirenberg equation and its application: The one-bubble case for $N\geq4$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N3JVJMDW

@misc{pith2026260711132,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A refined blow-up analysis of the Brezis-Nirenberg equation and its application: The one-bubble case for $N\geq4$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N3JVJMDW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11132}
}
abstract

In this paper, we consider the famous Brezis-Nirenberg equation \begin{eqnarray*} \left\{ \aligned &-\Delta u=\lambda u+|u|^{\frac{4}{N-2}}u,\quad&\mbox{in}\,\, \Omega,\\ &u=0,\quad&\mbox{on}\,\, \partial\Omega, \endaligned \right. \end{eqnarray*} where $N\geq3$ is the dimension, $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^N$ is a bounded domain with smooth boundary $\partial\Omega$ and $\lambda>0$ is a parameter. By developing a refined blow-up analysis based on the inverse reduction argument developed in \cite{WW2019,WW2019-2}, we classify, for the fist time, the Struwe decomposition of the Brezis-Nirenberg equation in the one-bubble case as the parameter $\lambda$ varies for $N\geq4$. As applications, we prove that the $4d$ Brezis-Nirenberg equation has a nontrivial solution (least energy solution) for $\lambda\in\sigma(-\Delta)$ in general bounded domains, where $\sigma(-\Delta)$ is the spectrum of $-\Delta$ in $H^1_0(\Omega)$. Our result completes the existence theory of the Brezis-Nirenberg equation for $N\geq4$ in \cite{AP2025,CFP1985,CFS,CSS1986,CW2005,CSZ2012,SWW2009,TYZ2022} since 1984.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    H. Ali, B. Premoselli, Least-energy solutions of the Brezis-Nirenberg problem in the non-coercive case in dimension 3, preprint (2025), arXiv:2509.19145v1

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Adimurthi, S. L. Yadava, Elementary proof of the nonexistence of nodal solutions for the semilinear elliptic equations with critical Sobolev exponent,Nonlinear Anal.14(1990), 785–787

    1990

  3. [3]

    Amadori, F

    A. Amadori, F. Gladiali, M. Grossi, A. Pistoia, G. Vaira, A complete scenario on nodal radial solutions to the Brezis-Nirenberg problem in low dimensions,Nonlinearity,34(2021), no.11, 8055-8093

    2021

  4. [4]

    Arioli, F

    G. Arioli, F. Gazzola, H. Grunau, E. Sassone, The second bifurcation branch for radial solutions of the Brezis- Nirenberg problem in dimension four,Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl.,15(2008), 69–90

    2008

  5. [5]

    Aubin, Espaces de Sobolev sur les varietes riemanniennes,Bull

    T. Aubin, Espaces de Sobolev sur les varietes riemanniennes,Bull. Sci. Math.,100, (1976) 149–173. THE STRUWE DECOMPOSITION 47

    1976

  6. [6]

    F. V. Atkinson, H. Brezis, L. A. Peletier, Nodal solutions of elliptic equations with critical Sobolev exponents, J. Differential Equations,85(1990), 151–170

    1990

  7. [7]

    Bahri and J.-M

    A. Bahri and J.-M. Coron. On a nonlinear elliptic equation involving the critical Sobolev exponent: the effect of the topology of the domain.Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,41(3) (1988) 253– 294

    1988

  8. [8]

    Ben Ayed, K

    M. Ben Ayed, K. El Mehdi, F. Pacella, Blow-up and nonexistence of sign-changing solutions to the Brezis- Nirenberg problem in dimension three,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare - Anal. Non Lineaire,23(2006), 567–589

    2006

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    Ben Ayed, K

    M. Ben Ayed, K. El Mehdi, F. Pacella, Blow-up and symmetry of sign-changing solutions to some critical elliptic equations,J. Differential Equations,230(2006), 771–795

    2006

  2. [10]

    Bianchi, H

    G. Bianchi, H. Egnell, A note on the Sobolev inequality.J. Funct. Anal.,100(1991), 18–24

    1991

  3. [11]

    Brezis, Elliptic equations with limiting Sobolev exponents: the impact of topology

    H. Brezis, Elliptic equations with limiting Sobolev exponents: the impact of topology. Frontiers of the mathe- matical sciences: 1985 (New York, 1985),Comm. Pure Appl. Math.39(S suppl) (1986), S17–S39

    1985

  4. [12]

    H. Brezis. Some of my favorite open problems,Rend. Lincei-Sci. Fis.,34(2023), no. 2, 307–335

    2023

  5. [13]

    Bartsch, A

    T. Bartsch, A. Micheletti, A. Pistoia, On the existence and the profile of nodal solutions of elliptic equations involving critical growth,Calc. Var. PDEs,26(2006), 265–282

    2006

  6. [14]

    Brezis, L

    H. Brezis, L. Nirenberg, Positive solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponents, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,36(1983), no. 4, 437–477

    1983

  7. [16]

    Capozzi, D

    A. Capozzi, D. Fortunato, G. Palmieri, An existence result for nonlinear elliptic problems involving critical Sobolev exponent,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Anal. Non Lineaire,2(1985), 463–470

    1985

  8. [17]

    Cerami, D

    G. Cerami, D. Fortunato, M. Struwe, Bifurcation and multiplicity results for nonlinear elliptic problems involv- ing critical Sobolev exponents,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare - Anal. Non Lineaire,1(1984), 341–350

    1984

  9. [18]

    D. Cao, P. Luo, S. Peng, The number of positive solutions to the Brezis-Nirenberg problem,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.374(2021), 1947–1985

    2021

  10. [19]

    D. Cao, S. Peng, S. Yan, Singularly Perturbed Methods for Nonlinear Elliptic Problems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021

    2021

  11. [20]

    Castro, M

    A. Castro, M. Clapp, The effect of the domain topology on the number of minimal nodal solutions of an elliptic equation at critical growth in a symmetric domain,Nonlinearity,16(2003), 579–590

    2003

  12. [21]

    Caffarelli, B

    L. Caffarelli, B. Gidas, J. Spruck, Asymptotic symmetry and local behavior of semilinear elliptic equations with critical Sobolev growth,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,42(1989) no.3, 271–297

    1989

  13. [22]

    Cerami, S

    G. Cerami, S. Solimini, M. Struwe, Some existence results for superlinear elliptic boundary value problems involving critical exponents,J. Funct. Anal.,69(1986), 289–306

    1986

  14. [23]

    H. Chen, S. Kim, J. Wei, Sharp quantitative stability estimates for the Brezis-Nirenberg problem,J. Funct. Anal.,291(2026), Paper No. 111515

    2026

  15. [24]

    Chen, C.-S

    Z. Chen, C.-S. Lin, W. Zou, Sign-changing solutions and phase separation for an elliptic system with critical exponent,Comm. PDE39(2014), 1827–1859

    2014

  16. [25]

    Z. Chen, N. Shioji, W. Zou, Ground state and multiple solutions for a critical exponent problem,NoDEA Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl.,19(2012), 253–277

    2012

  17. [26]

    Clapp, T

    M. Clapp, T. Weth, Multiple solutions for the Brezis-Nirenberg problem,Adv. Differential Equations,10 (2005), 463–480

    2005

  18. [27]

    del Pino, J

    M. del Pino, J. Dolbeault, M. Musso, The Brezis-Nirenberg problem near criticality in dimension 3,J. Math. Pures Appl.,12(2004), 1405–1456

    2004

  19. [28]

    del Pino, M

    M. del Pino, M. Musso, F. Pacard, A. Pistoia, Large energy entire solutions for the Yamabe equation,J. Differ. Equ.,251(2011), 2568–2597

    2011

  20. [29]

    S. Deng, M. Musso, J. Wei, New type of sign-changing blow-up solutions for scalar curvature type equations, Int. Math. Res. Not.,13(2019), 4159–4197

    2019

  21. [30]

    Devillanova, S

    G. Devillanova, S. Solimini, Concentration estimates and multiple solutions to elliptic problems at critical growth,Adv. Differential Equations,7(2002), 1257–1280

    2002

  22. [31]

    Devillanova, S

    G. Devillanova, S. Solimini, A multiplicity result for elliptic equations at critical growth in low dimension, Commun. Contemp. Math.,5(2003), 171–177

    2003

  23. [32]

    Ding, On a conformally invariant elliptic equation onR n,Commun

    W. Ding, On a conformally invariant elliptic equation onR n,Commun. Math. Phys.,107(1986), 331–335

    1986

  24. [33]

    Druet, Elliptic equations with critical Sobolev exponents in dimension 3,Ann

    O. Druet, Elliptic equations with critical Sobolev exponents in dimension 3,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare - Anal. Non Lineaire19(2002), 125–142

    2002

  25. [34]

    Druet, P

    O. Druet, P. Laurain, Stability of the Pohozaev obstruction in dimension 3,J. Eur. Math. Soc.,12(2010), 1117–1149

    2010

  26. [35]

    Esposito, On some conjectures proposed by Haim Brezis,Nonlinear Anal.54(2004), 751–759

    P. Esposito, On some conjectures proposed by Haim Brezis,Nonlinear Anal.54(2004), 751–759

    2004

  27. [36]

    Esposito, N

    P. Esposito, N. Ghoussoub, A. Pistoia, G. Vaira, Sign-changing solutions for critical equations with Hardy potential,Anal. PDE,14(2021), no. 2, 533–566

    2021

  28. [37]

    Figalli, F

    A. Figalli, F. Glaudo, On the Sharp Stability of Critical Points of the Sobolev Inequality.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.,237(2020), 201–258. 48 R. HE, X. LIU, J. WEI, AND Y. WU

    2020

  29. [38]

    Fortunato, E

    D. Fortunato, E. Jannelli, Infinitely many solutions for some nonlinear elliptic problems in symmetrical domains, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh,105A(1987), 205–213

    1987

  30. [39]

    Frank, T

    R. Frank, T. Konig, H. Kovarik, Energy asymptotics in the Brezis-Nirenberg problem. The higher-dimensional case,Math. Eng.2(2020), 119–140

    2020

  31. [40]

    Frank, T

    R. Frank, T. Konig, H. Kovarik, Energy asymptotics in the three-dimensional Brez´ ıs-Nirenberg problem,Calc. Var.60(2021), article 58

    2021

  32. [41]

    Frank, T

    R. Frank, T. Konig, H. Kovarik, Blow-up of solutions of critical elliptic equations in three dimensions,Anal. PDE,17(2024), 1633–1692

    2024

  33. [42]

    Gazzola, H.-Ch

    F. Gazzola, H.-Ch. Grunau, On the role of space dimensionn= 2 + 2 √ 2 in the semilinear Brezis-Nirenberg eigenvalue problem,Analysis20(2000), 395–399

    2000

  34. [43]

    Han, Asymptotic approach to singular solutions for nonlinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponent,Ann

    Z.-C. Han, Asymptotic approach to singular solutions for nonlinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponent,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare - Anal. Non Lineaire8(1991), 159–174

    1991

  35. [44]

    Iacopetti, Asymptotic analysis for radial sign-changing solutions of the Brezis-Nirenberg problem.Ann

    A. Iacopetti, Asymptotic analysis for radial sign-changing solutions of the Brezis-Nirenberg problem.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.194(2015), 1649–1682

    2015

  36. [45]

    Iacopetti, F

    A. Iacopetti, F. Pacella, Asymptotic analysis for radial sign-changing solutions of the Brezis-Nirenberg problem in low dimensions,Progress in Nonlinear Diff. Eq. and their Appl.,86(2015), 325–343

    2015

  37. [46]

    Iacopetti, F

    A. Iacopetti, F. Pacella, A nonexistence result for sign-changing solutions of the Brezis-Nirenberg problem in low dimensions,J. Differential Equations,.258(2015), 4180–4208

    2015

  38. [47]

    Iacopetti, G

    A. Iacopetti, G. Vaira, Sign-changing tower of bubbles for the Brezis-Nirenberg problem,Commun. Contemp. Math.,18(2016), article No. 1550036

    2016

  39. [48]

    Iacopetti, G

    A. Iacopetti, G. Vaira, Sign-chaning blowing-up solutions for the Brezis-Nirenberg problem in dimension four and five,Ann. Sc. Norm. Pisa Cl. Sci.,18(2018), 1–38

    2018

  40. [49]

    Konig, P

    T. Konig, P. Laurain, Multibubble blow-up analysis for the Brezis-Nirenberg problem in three dimensions, Amer. J. Math., 2026, to appear

    2026

  41. [50]

    Konig, P

    T. Konig, P. Laurain, Fine multibubble analysis in the higher-dimensional Brezis-Nirenberg problem,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare - Anal. Non Lineaire,41(2024), 1239–1287

    2024

  42. [51]

    F. Li, G. Vaira, J. Wei, Y. Wu, Construction of bubbling solutions of the Brezis-Nirenberg problem in general bounded domains (I): the dimensions 4 and 5,J. London Math. Soc.,112(2025), Paper No. e70246

    2025

  43. [52]

    F. Li, G. Vaira, J. Wei, Y. Wu, On Brezis-Nirenberg problems: open questions and new results in dimension six,Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst.,54(2026), 151–176

    2026

  44. [53]

    Micheletti, A

    A. Micheletti, A. Pistoia, On the effect of the domain geometry on the existence of sign changing solutions to elliptic problems with critical and supercritical growth,Nonlinearity,17(2004), 851–866

    2004

  45. [54]

    Micheletti, A

    A. Micheletti, A. Pistoia, J. Vetois, Blow-up solutions for asymptotically critical elliptic equations on Riemann- ian manifolds,Indiana Univ. Math. J.,58(2009), 1719–1746

    2009

  46. [55]

    Medina, M

    M. Medina, M. Musso, Doubling nodal solutions to the Yamabe equation inR n with maximal rank,J. Math. Pures Appl.,152(2021), 145–188

    2021

  47. [56]

    Medina, M

    M. Medina, M. Musso, J. Wei, Desingularization of Clifford torus and nonradial solutions to the Yamabe problem with maximal rank,J. Funct. Anal.,276(2019), 2470–2523

    2019

  48. [57]

    Musso, A

    M. Musso, A. Pistoia, Multispike solutions for a nonlinear elliptic problem involving the critical Sobolev expo- nent,Indiana Univ. Math. J.51(2002), no. 3, 541–579

    2002

  49. [58]

    Musso, A

    M. Musso, A. Pistoia, Tower of bubbles for almost critical problems in general domains, J. Math. Pures Appl., 93(2010), 1–40

    2010

  50. [59]

    Musso, S

    M. Musso, S. Rocci, G. Vaira, Nodal cluster solutions for the Brezis-Nirenberg problem in dimensionsN≥7, Calc. Var.,63(2024), article 119

    2024

  51. [60]

    Musso, D

    M. Musso, D. Salazar, Multispike solutions for the Brezis-Nirenberg problem in dimension three, J. Differential Equations, 264 (2018), 6663–6709

    2018

  52. [61]

    Musso, J

    M. Musso, J. Wei. Nondegeneracy of nodal solutions to the critical Yamabe problem,Commun. Math. Phys., 340(2015), 1049–1107

    2015

  53. [62]

    Pistoia, M

    A. Pistoia, M. Rago, G. Vaira, Multi-bubble solutions for the Brezis-Nirenberg problem in four dimensions, preprint (2025),Calc. Var.,65(2026), article 2

    2025

  54. [63]

    Pistoia, G

    A. Pistoia, G. Vaira, Nodal solutions of the Brezis-Nirenberg problem in dimension 6,Anal. Theory Appl.,38 (2022), no. 1, 1–25

    2022

  55. [64]

    Pistoia, J

    A. Pistoia, J. Vetois, Sign-changing bubble towers for asymptotically critical elliptic equations on Riemannian manifolds,J. Differ. Equ.,254(2013), 4245–4278

    2013

  56. [65]

    Premoselli, A priori estimates for finite-energy sign-changing blowing-up solutions of critical elliptic equa- tions,Int

    B. Premoselli, A priori estimates for finite-energy sign-changing blowing-up solutions of critical elliptic equa- tions,Int. Math. Res. Not.,2024(2024), 5212–5273

    2024

  57. [66]

    Premoselli, F

    B. Premoselli, F. Robert, One-bubble nodal blow-up for asymptotically critical stationary Schrodinger-type equations,J. Funct. Anal.,288(2025), article 110808

    2025

  58. [67]

    Premoselli, P

    B. Premoselli, P. Thizy, Bubbling above the threshold of the scalar curvature in dimensions four and five,Calc. Var.,57(2018), article 147. THE STRUWE DECOMPOSITION 49

    2018

  59. [68]

    Premoselli, J

    B. Premoselli, J. Vetois, Stability and instability results for sign-changing solutions to second-order critical elliptic equations,J. Math. Pures Appl.,167(2022), 257–293

    2022

  60. [69]

    Premoselli, J

    B. Premoselli, J. Vetois, Sign-changing blow-up for the Yamabe equation at the lowest energy level,Adv. Math., 410(2022), article 108769

    2022

  61. [70]

    Rey, Proof of two conjectures of H

    O. Rey, Proof of two conjectures of H. Brezis and L. A. Peletier,manuscripta math.,65(1990), 19–37

    1990

  62. [71]

    Rey, The role of the Green’s function in a nonlinear elliptic equation involving the critical Sobolev exponent, J

    O. Rey, The role of the Green’s function in a nonlinear elliptic equation involving the critical Sobolev exponent, J. Funct. Anal.,89(1990), no. 1, 1–52

    1990

  63. [72]

    Robert, J

    F. Robert, J. Vetois, Sign-changing blow-up for scalar curvature type equations,Comm. PDE,38(2013), 1437–1465

    2013

  64. [73]

    Robert, J

    F. Robert, J. Vetois, Sign-changing solutions to elliptic second order equations: glueing a peak to a degenerate critical manifold,Calc. Var.,54(2015), 693–716

    2015

  65. [74]

    Robert, J

    F. Robert, J. Vetois, Blowing-up solutions for 2nd-order critical elliptic equations: the impact of the scalar curvature,Int. Math. Res. Not.,2023(2023), 901–931

    2023

  66. [75]

    Schechter, W

    M. Schechter, W. Zou, On the Brezis-Nirenberg problem,Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.,197(2010), 337–356

    2010

  67. [76]

    Solimini, Morse index estimates in minimax Theorems,Manuscr

    S. Solimini, Morse index estimates in minimax Theorems,Manuscr. Math.63(1989), 421–453

    1989

  68. [77]

    Struwe, A global compactness result for elliptic boundary value problems involving limiting nonlinearities

    M. Struwe, A global compactness result for elliptic boundary value problems involving limiting nonlinearities. Math. Z.,187(1984), 511–517

    1984

  69. [78]

    L. Sun, J. Wei and W. Yang, On Brezis’ first open problem: a complete solution, preprint (2025), arXiv:2503.06904v1

    2025 arXiv

  70. [79]

    L. Sun, J. Wei, W. Yang, On the 3D Brezis-Nirenberg problem with small parameter,Commun. Contemp. Math., 2026, to appear

    2026

  71. [80]

    Szulkin, T

    A. Szulkin, T. Weth, M. Willem, Ground state solutions for a semilinear problem with critical exponent,Differ. Integral Equ.,22(2009), 913–926

    2009

  72. [81]

    Talenti, Best constant in Sobolev inequality,Ann

    G. Talenti, Best constant in Sobolev inequality,Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.,110(1976) 353–372

    1976

  73. [82]

    Tavares, S

    H. Tavares, S. You, W. Zou, Least energy positive solutions of critical Schrodinger systems with mixed compe- tition and cooperation terms: the higher dimensional case,J. Funct. Anal.,283(2022), article No. 109497

    2022

  74. [83]

    Uhlenbeck, Generic properties of eigenfunctions,Am

    K. Uhlenbeck, Generic properties of eigenfunctions,Am. J. Math.,98(1976), 1059–1078

    1976

  75. [84]

    Vaira, A new kind of blowing-up solutions for the Brezis-Nirenberg problem,Calc

    G. Vaira, A new kind of blowing-up solutions for the Brezis-Nirenberg problem,Calc. Var.,52(2015), 389–422

    2015

  76. [85]

    K. Wang, J. Wei, Finite Morse index implies finite ends,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,72(2019),1044–1119

    2019

  77. [86]

    K. Wang, J. Wei, Second order estimates on transition layers,Adv. Math.,358(2019), article No. 106856. School of Mathematics, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, P.R. China, Yunnan Key Lab- oratory of Modern Analytical Mathematics and Applications, Kunming, 650500, P.R....

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.