Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 63 references

Collisionless whistler heat-flux instability in ultra-high-$\beta$ plasmas

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Pith's one-line read In ultra-high-β plasmas the whistler heat-flux instability saturates with order-unity magnetic fluctuations and moves heat by advection at the wave phase speed, not by resonant scattering.

desk verdict Solid first PIC map of the ultra-high-β WHFI: advective barrier picture is new and usable, theory is heuristic and geometry-dependent. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.11761 v1 pith:7XMZR4JR submitted 2026-07-13 physics.plasm-ph astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE

classification physics.plasm-phastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords whistlerheat-fluxinstabilityultra-high-βplasmaelectronheattransportparticle-in-cellkinetichigh-energy-densityphysicscollisionless
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens to electron heat transport when the whistler heat-flux instability (WHFI) operates in the previously unexplored ultra-high-β regime βe ≳ LT/ρe. Earlier theory, valid only for moderate β, predicts small-amplitude whistlers that suppress heat by resonant pitch-angle scattering and leave a parallel heat flux scaling as βe−1. Extrapolating that theory shows that the same instability must reach δB ~ B0 once βe exceeds LT/ρe, so the small-amplitude picture fails. Using 1D3V and 2D3V particle-in-cell simulations the authors show that the waves do saturate at large amplitude, form a moving magnetic barrier that traps or reflects most heat-carrying electrons, and transport thermal energy mainly by advection at the whistler phase velocity. The resulting parallel heat fluxes are qe∥/qfs ≈ 4.7 βe−1 in 2D and ≈ 0.3 βe−1/2 in 1D, both independent of the temperature-gradient scale once the ultra-high-β threshold is crossed; cross-field transport stays negligible. The same scaling therefore appears in every collisionless high-β regime studied so far, and can be inserted into fluid codes for laser plasmas and the reionised intergalactic medium.

What carries the argument

The advective heat-flux closure: once δB/B0 ~ 1, nonlinear wave-particle interactions dominate, electrons are trapped or reflected by the large-amplitude whistlers, and the heat flux collapses to qe∥/qfs ~ vph/vthe, with the saturation amplitude fixed by δB2/B02 ~ βe0 (qe∥/qfs).

What would settle it

A 2D or 3D collisionless PIC run with βe0 ≳ LT0/ρe0 in which the measured parallel heat flux remains far larger than the independently measured whistler phase velocity, or in which δB/B0 stays ≪ 1 at saturation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In ultra-high-β plasmas (βe0 ≳ LT0/ρe0) the collisionless WHFI saturates with magnetic fluctuations of order the background field (or larger in 1D). The parallel heat flux is then set by advection at the whistler phase velocity rather than by resonant scattering, giving the measured scalings qe∥/qfs ≈ 4.7 βe−1 (2D3V) and ≈ 0.3 βe−1/2 (1D3V) that no longer depend on LT0 at fixed βe0.

Load-bearing premise

The authors assume that once the magnetic fluctuations reach order unity, nonlinear wave terms automatically balance the free-energy drive and set the saturation level; this is an ordering argument checked only after the fact against the simulations, not a closed nonlinear theory.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the collisionless whistler heat-flux instability (WHFI) in the ultra-high-β regime βe ≳ LT/ρe, where extrapolation of moderate-β theory predicts order-unity magnetic fluctuations. From a heuristic ordering of the Vlasov–Maxwell system (Eqs. 2.8–2.18), the authors argue that nonlinear interactions, rather than cyclotron damping, set saturation once δB/B0 ∼ 1, implying δB^{2}/B0^{2} ∼ βe0 (qe∥/qfs). They then contrast a Ryutov-style diffusive closure with an advective closure qe∥/qfs ∼ vph/vthe. 1D3V and 2D3V OSIRIS PIC simulations that systematically vary βe0 and LT0/ρe0, measure dispersion relations, particle trajectories, and cross-field fluxes, show that the advective picture is preferred: heat flux is localised by a transport barrier of large-amplitude whistlers, is independent of LT0 at fixed βe0, and tracks the measured phase velocity, giving qe∥/qfs ≈ 4.7 βe^{-1} (2D) and ≈ 0.3 βe^{-1}/^{2} (1D). Cross-field transport remains negligible even for inclined B0.

Significance. If the result holds, it supplies a simple, local, LT-independent heat-flux closure for collisionless ultra-high-β plasmas that is directly usable in MHD models of ICF hot-spots, laser-plasma experiments, and the reionised IGM. The work systematically maps the transition out of the quasilinear moderate-β regime, demonstrates that large-amplitude whistlers act as magnetic mirrors/transport barriers rather than pure pitch-angle scatterers, and provides falsifiable scalings (including the 1D/2D difference) that can be tested by future 3D or weakly collisional runs. The combination of a transparent kinetic ordering, multi-dimensional PIC scans, and explicit comparison of two closures is a clear advance over prior moderate-β studies.

major comments (3)
  1. §2.3 and Eqs. (2.8)–(2.18): the central saturation relation δB^{2}/B0^{2} ∼ βe0 (qe∥/qfs) rests on the posited ordering that nonlinear terms dominate cyclotron damping once δB/B0 ∼ 1 and that δfe ∼ f(1)e. This is not derived from a closed nonlinear theory; it is assumed and then checked a posteriori. The manuscript should either (i) supply a more rigorous saturation argument (e.g., from wave-energy balance or a reduced nonlinear model) or (ii) clearly label the relation as a working hypothesis whose only support is the subsequent PIC agreement, and discuss how residual cyclotron damping or wave–wave cascades could alter the prefactor.
  2. §2.3.2, Figs. 3, 5, 15, 17: the claim that heat flux is set by advection at vph uses the measured phase velocity both to predict and to validate qe∥/qfs ∼ vph/vthe. Because the large-amplitude dispersion relation is not theoretically fixed (α in vph ∼ βe0^α is free), the agreement is order-unity but not independent. The 1D/2D discrepancy in α and in whether δB saturates at ∼ B0 further shows that the nonlinear spectrum that sets vph is geometry-dependent and not under theoretical control. A short discussion of what would falsify the advective picture (e.g., a residual LT-dependent channel at still higher βe0, or a mismatch once vph is predicted rather than measured) would strengthen the claim.
  3. §4.4 and the applications paragraph: the recommended MHD closure qe∥ ≈ 4.7 βe^{-1} qfs is taken from 2D3V collisionless runs. The manuscript already notes that 3D mode coupling, field-line wandering, and weak collisions remain unexplored. Given that the 1D/2D difference already changes both the amplitude and the β-scaling, the paper should quantify (or at least bound) how much the prefactor and the LT-independence could shift under those effects before the closure is presented as ready for ICF or IGM modelling.
minor comments (5)
  1. Abstract and §4.1: the quoted prefactors 4.7 and 0.3 are fits; state the fitting range of βe0 and the uncertainty (or at least that they are order-unity) so readers do not treat them as universal constants.
  2. Fig. 2 and related time histories: the sharp drop in ⟨qe∥⟩ when the small-LT region is first defined mixes a physical change with a change of averaging domain. A short note or an alternative fixed-window average would avoid confusion.
  3. Eq. (2.2) and the free-streaming normalisation: qfs is defined with the hot-wall Maxwellian; a one-sentence reminder that local qfs would differ by an O(1) factor would help when comparing to other works that use local thermal quantities.
  4. Table 1: the βe0 = 400 2D3V run uses reduced nppc; a brief statement that noise remains sub-dominant (or a short convergence check) would reassure readers.
  5. Typos / notation: “whistler heat-flux instability” is occasionally abbreviated inconsistently; “Righi-Leduc” appears without a reference on first use; a few sentences in §4.3 are slightly repetitive of the abstract.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Heuristic ordering and advective closure are posited then checked a posteriori against independent PIC measurements of v_ph, q and δB; only mild presentation of measured v_ph as “predictions” of the same runs.

  1. fitted input called prediction [§3.2.1 / Fig. 5 and surrounding text; analogous in §3.3.1 / Fig. 17]
    "Theoretical predictions based on the measured values of vph/vthe at each βe0, together with (2.25) and (2.26), are also shown. … qe∥/qfs agrees with vph/vthe for both oblique and parallel modes to within an order-unity prefactor."

    vph is extracted from the identical simulation data whose qe∥ and δB are being “predicted.” Inserting that measured vph into the assumed closures (2.25–2.26) produces curves that necessarily track the data if the closures hold; the agreement therefore tests the modelling assumption rather than constituting an independent first-principles forecast. Prefactors are subsequently fitted, reinforcing the post-hoc character. The functional form itself is not forced by construction, so the circularity remains mild.

full rationale

The load-bearing relations (2.18) and (2.25–2.26) follow from an explicit ordering assumption (2.8) that nonlinear terms dominate once δB/B0∼1, plus the further modelling choice that heat flux is advective. These are not derived from a closed nonlinear theory, but they are also not tautological: δB, qe∥ and vph are measured independently (fields vs. particle moments vs. Fourier spectrograms) and the relations are tested for consistency. Prefactors (A≈4.7, 0.3, …) are fitted after the fact to the simulation data, which is ordinary reporting rather than a circular derivation. Self-citations supply only the moderately-high-β background and do not force the ultra-high-β scalings. No uniqueness theorem, smuggled ansatz or definitional identity equates the claimed result to its inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the PIC benchmarks; residual circularity is limited to the rhetorical labelling of measured-vph insertions as “predictions.”

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on the Vlasov–Maxwell system, a standard high-β ordering that neglects ion dynamics and displacement current, the posited nonlinear saturation balance δfe∼f(1)e, and two order-unity prefactors fitted to the PIC data. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • 2D heat-flux prefactor A2D = ≈4.7
    Best-fit constant in qe∥/qfs=A2D βe0−1; reported as ≈4.7–4.8 from parallel and angled 2D3V runs.
  • 1D heat-flux prefactor A1D = ≈0.3
    Best-fit constant in qe∥/qfs=A1D βe0−1/2; reported as ≈0.3 from 1D3V runs.
  • magnetic-energy prefactor (order-unity) = O(1) (e.g. 3 or 6.6)
    Multiplicative constant relating δB2/B02 to βe0 vph/vthe; adjusted post-hoc to overlay theory curves on simulation points.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Collisionless Vlasov–Maxwell system with cold ions (Ti≪Te) and negligible displacement current for whistlers.
    Stated at the opening of §2.3; standard for high-β electron-scale waves.
  • ad hoc to paper Ordering (2.8): ωww/Ωe∼vph/vthe∼f(1)e/f(0)e∼δfe/f(0)e∼ρe/LT∼1/βe≪δB/B0∼kρe∼1.
    Introduced to close the nonlinear kinetic equations; not derived from a rigorous multiple-scale expansion.
  • ad hoc to paper Nonlinear interactions (rather than cyclotron damping) set the saturation amplitude once δB/B0≳1, implying δB2/B02∼βe0(qe∥/qfs).
    Posited in §2.3 after the ordering; tested only by comparison with the PIC saturation levels.
  • domain assumption Heat flux is either purely diffusive (χ∼ρe vthe) or purely advective (qe∼ne Te vph).
    Two candidate closures examined in §2.3.1–2.3.2; simulations select the advective branch.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Collisionless whistler heat-flux instability in ultra-high-$\beta$ plasmas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7XMZR4JR

@misc{pith2026260711761,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Collisionless whistler heat-flux instability in ultra-high-$\beta$ plasmas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7XMZR4JR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11761}
}
abstract

Kinetic instabilities, notably the whistler heat-flux instability (WHFI), are known to suppress thermal transport significantly in the moderate- to high-$\beta$ plasmas relevant to many astrophysical systems. This paper explores WHFI-regulated heat transport in a new regime: ultra-high-$\beta$ plasmas with $\beta_{e} \gtrsim L_{\mathrm{T}}/\rho_e$. Extrapolating previous theories of the WHFI to ultra-high-$\beta$ plasmas, we propose that the magnetic energy in unstable whistler fluctuations becomes comparable to that of the background magnetic field at saturation. We corroborate this hypothesis using 1D3V and 2D3V kinetic simulations using the particle-in-cell code OSIRIS. We find that, in ultra-high-$\beta$ plasmas, the heat flux is localised and no longer regulated primarily by resonant pitch-angle scattering of electrons; instead, thermal energy is transported predominantly by advection at the whistler phase velocity. Heat-flux suppression is observed in 1D3V and 2D3V simulations; however, we show that the saturation of the WHFI and the regulation of heat flux are sensitive to dimensionality in the ultra-high-$\beta$ regime. The amplitude and phase velocity of the heat-flux-regulating whistler waves scale differently with $\beta_e$, yielding parallel heat fluxes, normalised to the free-streaming value, of $q_{e\parallel} / q_\mathrm{fs} \approx 4.7 \beta_{e}^{-1}$ and $q_{e\parallel} / q_\mathrm{fs} \approx 0.3 \beta_{e}^{-1/2}$ in 2D3V and 1D3V simulations, respectively. We perform 2D3V simulations with background magnetic fields inclined to the temperature gradient, showing cross-field heat transport remains negligible. We develop a heuristic theory from kinetic equations that explains these phenomena. Our work extends our understanding of how the WHFI modifies thermal transport to regimes applicable to high-energy-density physics and the reionised intergalactic medium.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11761 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The magnetic fields and Te from a 2D3V WHFI simulation with βe0 = 180 during (a) exponential growth at tΩe0 = 60 and (b) nonlinear growth at tΩe0 = 1069. The temperature increases along the x direction, and the background magnetic field is parallel to the x axis. Panel (a) shows the formation of waves with wavefronts oblique to the background magnetic field in the hotter (right-hand) half of the simulation box and h… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Temporal evolution of the spatially averaged parallel heat flux (upper) and perturbed magnetic energy (lower) for 2D3V simulations with background magnetic fields parallel to the temperature gradient, LT0/ρe0 = 100, and a range of βe0 values. Both quantities are spatially averaged over the small-LT region and the heat flux is normalised to the free-streaming value. A black line is drawn at ⟨δB2 /B2 0 ⟩ = 1 to show w… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. figure 3. These show that the dispersion relation is linear, following [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (19 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Spectrograms in wavenumber-frequency space of By +iBz for panels (a),(b) βe0 = 60 and (c),(d) βe0 = 280 in the saturated state. The plots are taken from magnetic field data over the entire spatial domain, excluding the boundary masking regions, and over the last 350Ω −…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fourier spectra of By + iBz for 2D3V simulations with LT0/ρe0 = 100 and a parallel macroscopic magnetic field with (a) βe0 = 60 and (b) βe0 = 280. Shown are spectra for parallel (kyρe0 = 0) and oblique (kyρe0 = 1) modes, as well as spectra integrated over all ky. The s…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Scalings of (a) the heat flux and (b) the perturbed magnetic energy with βe0 in 2D3V simulations with LT0/ρe0 = 100, where the values on the y axes have been spatially averaged over the small-LT region. In panel (a), the best-fitting line of the form ⟨qe∥/qfs⟩ = Aβ−1 e…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Electron trajectories for particles that were on the hot side of the small-LT region at tΩe0 = 370 in the 2D3V simulation with βe0 = 120 and LT0/ρe0 = 100. Only a subset of electrons that met these criteria had their trajectories plotted to avoid overcrowding the figur…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Temporal evolution of the spatially averaged parallel heat flux (upper) and perturbed magnetic energy (lower) for 2D3V simulations with background magnetic fields parallel to the temperature gradient and βe0 = 120. LT0/ρe0 is varied between 44 and 150 in order to incre…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Values of a) vph/vthe and b) the peak wavenumber for simulations with βe0 = 120 and varying LT0/ρe0 for both parallel (kyρe0 = 0) and oblique (kyρe0 = 1) modes. The peak wavenumber was found for each time step in the last 350Ω −1 e0 of each simulation and the mean of t…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Magnetic field and Te at a) tΩe0 = 54, during exponential wave growth, and b) tΩe0 = 570, during nonlinear growth. Images are taken from a 2D3V simulation with an oblique background magnetic field and βe0 = 400. Purple lines show the magnetic field lines in the plane o…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Scalings of (a) the heat flux and (b) the perturbed magnetic energy with βe0 in 2D3V simulations with LT0/ρe0 = 100 and angled magnetic fields, where the values on the y axes have been spatially averaged over the small-LT region and temporally averaged over the satura…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Temporal evolution of the spatially averaged (solid lines) and RMS (dashed lines) (a) qe∧ and (b) qe⊥, normalised to qfs. Averages are taken over the small-LT region. Panels (c) and (d) show how the cross-field transport, temporally averaged over the saturated interva…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The magnetic fields and Te for a 1D3V simulation with βe0 = 280 and LT0/ρe0 = 100 when the WHFI is undergoing nonlinear growth at tΩe0 = 1617. The temperature increases along the x direction, and the background magnetic field is parallel to the x axis. 10−2 10−1 hqek/…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Temporal evolution of the spatially averaged parallel heat flux (upper) and perturbed magnetic energy (lower) for 1D3V simulations with background magnetic fields parallel to the temperature gradient and at a range of βe0 values. The heat flux is normalised to the fre…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Electron trajectories for particles that were on the hot side of the small-LT region at tΩe0 = 1200 in the 1D3V simulation with βe0 = 120 and LT0/ρe0 = 100. Only a subset of electrons satisfying these criteria are plotted to avoid overcrowding the figure (coloured lin…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (a) Dispersion relation for a 1D3V simulation with βe0 = 280 and LT0/ρe0 = 100, computed using waves during the last 2000Ω −1 e0 of simulation time during the saturated interval and excluding data in the masking region. Two best-fitting curves have been plotted: a lin…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (a) Fourier spectra of By + iBz for 1D3V simulations with βe0 ∈ {60, 280, 1000} and LT0/ρe0 = 100, averaged over the last 2000Ω −1 e0 of simulation time during the saturated interval and excluding data in the masking region. The spectra have been normalised such that …
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Scalings of (a) the heat flux and (b) the perturbed magnetic energy with βe0 in 1D3V simulations for LT0/ρe0 = 100, where the values on the y axes have been spatially averaged over the small-LT region and temporally averaged over the saturated interval. A black dashed…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Temporal evolution of the spatially averaged parallel heat flux (upper) and perturbed magnetic energy (lower) for 1D3V simulations with background magnetic fields parallel to the temperature gradient and βe0 = 180. LT0/ρe0 is varied between 44 and 340 in order to vary…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Values of vph/vthe for simulations with βe0 = 180 and varying LT0/ρe0. The mean phase velocity and 1σ error bars were calculated in the same way as in figure 17. within the uncertainty, regardless of LT0/ρe0, as expected for a quantity that depends only on βe0 [PITH_…
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Fourier spectra of By + iBz at different times for (a) 1D3V βe0 = 60, (b) 2D3V βe0 = 60, (c) 1D3V βe0 = 280, and (d) 2D3V βe0 = 280 simulations. For the 1D3V plots, the Fourier spectra have been averaged over 100Ω −1 e0 around the time shown. For the 2D3V plots, the a…
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Probability-density maps for the relative changes in magnetic moment and velocity for particles that undergo reflection events, as defined in the text, in both (a) 1D3V and (b) 2D3V simulations. Both simulations have βe0 = 120. In 1D3V, the magnetic moment is approxim…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Transport. Phys. Rev. , author =. 1953 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.89.977 , language =

  2. [2]

    Elecron. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 1981 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.243 , language =

  3. [3]

    Indications of. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 1975 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.721 , language =

  4. [4]

    Collisionless conduction in a high-beta plasma: a collision operator for whistler turbulence , volume =. J. Plasma Phys. , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S002237782400151X , language =

  5. [5]

    and Schekochihin, A

    Komarov, S. and Schekochihin, A. A. and Churazov, E. and Spitkovsky, A. , year=. Self-inhibiting thermal conduction in a high- , whistler-unstable plasma , volume=. doi:10.1017/S0022377818000399 , journal=

  6. [6]

    Suppression of Electron Thermal Conduction by Whistler Turbulence in a Sustained Thermal Gradient , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.035101 , url =

  7. [7]

    Astrophys

    Whistler-regulated. Astrophys. J. , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ff1 , urldate =

  8. [8]

    Gary, S. P. and Li, H. , title =. 2000 , month =. doi:10.1086/308294 , url =

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Strong suppression of heat conduction in a laboratory replica of galaxy-cluster turbulent plasmas , volume =. Sci. Adv. , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj6799 , language =

  2. [10]

    Astrophys. J. Lett. , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/830/1/L9 , urldate =

  3. [11]

    Astrophys

    Inhibition of. Astrophys. J. , author =. 1992 , keywords =. doi:10.1086/171072 , urldate =

  4. [12]

    Collisional whistler instability and electron temperature staircase in inhomogeneous plasma , volume =. J. Plasma Phys. , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0022377825000078 , language =

  5. [13]

    Self-inhibiting heat flux , volume =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , author =. 1998 , pages =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01770.x , language =

  6. [14]

    Zakamska, N. L. and Narayan, R. , title =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1086/344641 , url =

  7. [15]

    Magnetized. Phys. Plasmas , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1063/5.0081915 , language =

  8. [16]

    Plasma Phys

    Study of flux limiter using. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/52/8/085008 , urldate =

  9. [17]

    A nonlocal electron conduction model for multidimensional radiation hydrodynamics codes , volume =. Phys. Plasmas , author =. 2000 , keywords =. doi:10.1063/1.1289512 , language =

  10. [18]

    Magnetized. Nucl. Fusion , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/adb7f0 , urldate =

  11. [19]

    Fusion Yield Enhancement in Magnetized Laser-Driven Implosions , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.035006 , url =

  12. [20]

    Kinetic stability of. J. Plasma Phys. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0022377824000308 , language =

  13. [21]

    Astrophys

    Similarity. Astrophys. J. , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1086/307293 , language =

  14. [22]

    Galaxies , author =

    From. Galaxies , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.3390/galaxies7020047 , language =

  15. [23]

    Nonlocal. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 1983 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1664 , language =

  16. [24]

    Transport. Rev. Plasma Phys. , author =. 1965 , pages =

  17. [25]

    An improved masking method for absorbing boundaries in electromagnetic particle simulations , volume =. Comput. Phys. Commun. , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(01)00182-5 , language =

  18. [26]

    Modeling transport in weakly collisional plasmas using thermodynamic forcing , volume =. Phys. Rev. E , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1103/xtn8-r48v , language =

  19. [27]

    Pressure-anisotropy-driven microturbulence and magnetic-field evolution in shearing, collisionless plasma , volume =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw793 , language =

  20. [28]

    Thermodynamics and collisionality in firehose-susceptible high- plasmas , volume =. J. Plasma Phys. , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0022377825100731 , language =

  21. [29]

    Plasma Phys

    Kinetic physics in. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aab79f , urldate =

  22. [30]

    Magnetized. Phys. Plasmas , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0274275 , language =

  23. [31]

    Self-. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.155001 , language =

  24. [32]

    Biermann battery magnetic fields in. Phys. Plasmas , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0059366 , language =

  25. [33]

    Modeling hot-spot self-generated magnetic fields using the deceleration-phase. Phys. Plasmas , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0278219 , language =

  26. [34]

    Self-generated magnetic fields in the hot spot of direct-drive cryogenic implosions at. Phys. Plasmas , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0211922 , language =

  27. [35]

    Origin of primordial magnetic fields , volume =. Phys. Rev. D , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.043529 , language =

  28. [36]

    Physics Letters B , author =

    Magnetic fields from cosmological phase transitions , volume =. Physics Letters B , author =. 1991 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90051-Q , language =

  29. [37]

    Inflation-produced, large-scale magnetic fields , volume =. Phys. Rev. D , author =. 1988 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.2743 , language =

  30. [38]

    Astrophys

    Cosmological ``. Astrophys. J. , author =. 1992 , keywords =. doi:10.1086/186384 , urldate =

  31. [39]

    Origin of galactic and extragalactic magnetic fields , volume =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , author =. 2002 , pages =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.775 , language =

  32. [40]

    Progress on cosmological magnetic fields , volume =. Rep. Prog. Phys. , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac03a9 , urldate =

  33. [41]

    Cosmological magnetic fields: their generation, evolution and observation , volume =. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 , language =

  34. [42]

    The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields , volume =. Rep. Prog. Phys. , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076901 , urldate =

  35. [43]

    and Pogosian, L

    Jedamzik, K. and Pogosian, L. , editor =. Primordial. The. 2024 , doi =

  36. [44]

    Constraints on thermal conductivity in the merging cluster. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3101 , language =

  37. [45]

    Astrophys. J. , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1086/374656 , urldate =

  38. [46]

    Fonseca, R. A. and Silva, L. O. and Tsung, F. S. and Decyk, V. K. and Lu, W. and Ren, C. and Mori, W. B. and Deng, S. and Lee, S. and Katsouleas, T. and Adam, J. C. , editor =. Computational. 2002 , pages =. doi:10.1007/3-540-47789-6_36 , urldate =

  39. [47]

    Magnetogenesis around the first galaxies: the impact of different field seeding processes on galaxy formation , volume =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab086 , language =

  40. [48]

    Galactic. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052807 , language =

  41. [49]

    The generation of magnetic fields by the. Phys. Plasmas , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.4946017 , language =

  42. [50]

    Astrophys

    Evolution of. Astrophys. J. , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5960 , urldate =

  43. [51]

    Simulations of extragalactic magnetic fields and of their observables , volume =. Class. Quantum Gravity , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa8e60 , urldate =

  44. [52]

    High Power Laser Sci

    Design of experiments characterising heat conduction in magnetised, weakly collisional plasma , copyright =. High Power Laser Sci. Eng. , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1017/hpl.2026.10152 , language =

  45. [53]

    In the beginning: the first sources of light and the reionization of the universe , volume =. Phys. Rep. , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00019-9 , language =

  46. [54]

    and Juno, J

    Hanebring, L. and Juno, J. and Hakim, A. and TenBarge, J. M. and Pusztai, I. , year =. From. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2601.10472 , urldate =

  47. [55]

    Efficient. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.091103 , language =

  48. [56]

    Astrophys

    Magnetogenesis in a. Astrophys. J. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b0f , urldate =

  49. [57]

    Spontaneous magnetization of collisionless plasma , volume =. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2119831119 , language =

  50. [58]

    Astrophys

    Fluctuation. Astrophys. J. Lett. , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad638 , urldate =

  51. [59]

    Fluctuation dynamo in a weakly collisional plasma , volume =. J. Plasma Phys. , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0022377820000860 , language =

  52. [60]

    Astrophys

    Thermal Instability. Astrophys. J. , year = 1965, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1086/148317 , adsurl =

  53. [61]

    Choudhury, P. P. and Sharma, P. and Quataert, E. , pages =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1857 , issn =

  54. [62]

    Choudhury, P. P. and Bott, A. F. A. , title =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.26227 , archivePrefix =. 2606.26227 , primaryClass =

  55. [63]

    Smoothing and. Anal. Chem. , author =. 1964 , pages =. doi:10.1021/ac60214a047 , language =

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.