Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 155 references

Photonic Ising machines toward and beyond a million spins

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Photonic Ising machines can plausibly be scaled to and beyond one million spins, and this paper lays out three architectures that could get there.

desk verdict Useful survey of photonic Ising machines, but the flagship spatiotemporal roadmap quietly needs a million-core fiber and a weight-loading scheme it never describes. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13446 v1 pith:7KY52NAN submitted 2026-07-15 physics.optics physics.app-ph

classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords photonicIsingmachinecombinatorialoptimizationopticalmatrix-vectormultiplicationspatiallightmodulationthin-filmlithiumniobatemulticorefibercoherentscalablearchitecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that photonic Ising machines—hardware that maps combinatorial optimization problems onto networks of binary spins and lets light seek low-energy solutions—can be scaled to a million spins and beyond, a size the authors say real-world problems in drug discovery, logistics, and materials design require. It surveys demonstrated systems (fibre, free-space, and integrated, up to roughly 360,000 spins) and identifies the bottlenecks: connectivity, reconfigurability, time-to-solution, and precision. Its central contribution is a roadmap of three architectures judged able to cross the million-spin mark: a photonic chiplet processor that partitions the coupling matrix across many chips; a free-space processor using spatial light modulation, with Fourier-domain multiplication to avoid explicit fan-out; and an all-optical coherent spatiotemporal machine that stores the whole matrix as pulses in a multicore fibre loop and performs multiply-accumulate operations with second-order nonlinear optics. If these scale as argued, optical solvers could offer microsecond-scale iterations at room temperature with far lower energy than electronic approaches. The paper is a perspective, so its claims are architectural extrapolations and design targets rather than demonstrated milestones.

What carries the argument

The paper's load-bearing objects are the Ising Hamiltonian E = -ΣJ_ij s_i s_j - Σh_i s_i, whose ground states encode solutions; the optical matrix-vector multiplication (MVM) that implements spin-spin couplings; and three multiplexing dimensions—time, space, and wavelength. The most specific mechanism is the all-optical coherent spatiotemporal architecture: a multicore fibre loop stores one column of the coupling matrix per core as a train of optical pulses (N cores × N pulses = N² elements); a thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) waveguide uses sum-frequency generation in a recirculating one-pulse register to multiply and accumulate pulse pairs, with difference-frequency generation ejecting the

What would settle it

A back-of-envelope power audit settles the flagship architecture: 10^12 pulses × 4 fJ per pulse per ~5 µs round trip yields roughly 800 kW, not 800 W; a prototype at 1,000 spins with the claimed 50 dB SNR and stable DOPA compensation over 1,000 round trips would further test the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core claim is that obstacles to large-scale photonic Ising machines are architectural rather than fundamental. Currently demonstrated platforms—100,000-spin fibre machines, 360,000-spin free-space systems, and integrated chips near 40,000 spins—can be extended by three routes: chiplets that decompose the N×N coupling matrix across parallel photonic chips; free-space systems that encode spins in spatial light modulators and use Fourier-domain multiplication so fan-in/fan-out does not set the scale; and an all-optical coherent spatiotemporal architecture that stores N×N matrix pulses in a multicore fibre loop and performs multiply-accumulate operations with a sum-frequency-generati

Load-bearing premise

The million-spin claim for the flagship all-optical architecture rests on storing the full coupling matrix in a multicore fibre loop with about one million parallel cores, roughly four orders of magnitude beyond today's multicore fibres—and the accompanying 800 W circulating-power budget does not match the paper's own pulse-count and per-pulse energy figures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the chiplet route works, a 5×5 array of chiplets, each handling more than 40,000 spins, would collectively implement a million-spin Ising machine while preserving all-to-all connectivity in the decomposed couplings.
  • A free-space processor built from commercially available multi-million-pixel spatial light modulators (or metasurfaces) could support thousands of spins per module today and a million via Fourier-domain multiplication, at the cost of restricting couplings to convolutional forms.
  • The all-optical spatiotemporal architecture, if realised, would need no optical-electrical-optical conversions, avoiding the DAC/ADC and memory-access latency that dominates time-multiplexed machines, at a 200 GHz clock.
  • At the paper's quoted energy budget, a million-spin machine's optical memory would consume about 40 fJ per MAC at 8-bit precision—orders of magnitude below the energy per operation of electronic solvers—and the whole computation could iterate in the microsecond range.
  • If these architectures reach the million-spin scale, problem classes requiring roughly 10^6 variables—1,000-city travelling-salesman instances and 200-amino-acid lattice protein models—become the native size class for photonic Ising hardware.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's own energy figures for the spatiotemporal memory appear inconsistent: 10^12 pulses at 4 fJ each in a ~5 µs loop round trip implies roughly 800 kW of circulating power, not the stated 800 W; a corrected budget would change the 40 fJ/MAC estimate materially.
  • The spatiotemporal architecture quietly assumes ~10^6 parallel fibre cores or waveguides for one million spins, about four orders of magnitude beyond demonstrated multicore fibre (roughly 100 cores); no current packaging or fabrication path is identified for that leap.
  • The free-space Fourier-domain route, restricted to convolutional couplings, could still cover many practical problems if combined with chiplet-style partitioning—the paper sketches but does not develop this hybrid.
  • A concrete testable extension: build a small spatiotemporal prototype (say 1,000 spins, one core per column) to measure whether the SFG accumulator and in-loop parametric amplifier maintain 50 dB SNR over hundreds of round trips; the architecture's feasibility hinges on exactly that measurement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This perspective reviews the state of the art in photonic Ising machines and argues that several emerging architectures—integrated photonic chiplets, free-space spatial/optoelectronic processors, and an all-optical coherent spatiotemporal processor—could plausibly scale to and beyond a million Ising spins. The paper classifies existing demonstrations by platform (fiber, free-space, integrated), tabulates representative results, identifies scalability/connectivity/precision bottlenecks, and provides order-of-magnitude resource estimates for the proposed spatiotemporal design. Its stated key point is that multiple approaches could plausibly reach million-spin scales, enabling practical heuristic solvers for combinatorial optimization.

Significance. If the roadmap is credible, the paper is a useful synthesis for a field moving from small laboratory demonstrations toward application-scale hardware. Its strengths include a broad and current survey (Table 1), a clear taxonomy of multiplexing strategies, and an explicit quantitative sketch of a specific all-optical architecture (Section 3.3). The paper does not report new experiments, so its value rests on the accuracy and completeness of its feasibility analysis. The main risk is overstatement: the qualitative claims for chiplet and free-space routes are qualified by sparse connectivity or convolutional restrictions, while the one route explicitly targeting dense all-to-all million-spin operation (Section 3.3) omits a critical hardware requirement—the number of parallel fiber cores—and the weight-loading mechanism. These gaps are fixable in a revision but are load-bearing for the central key-point claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.3] The architecture stores the Ising matrix in a multicore fiber loop with 'N total fiber cores, with each fiber core storing N pulses' (text near Fig. 4b). For N=10^6 this requires 10^6 parallel fiber cores. State-of-the-art multicore fibers cited in refs. 172 and 173 have about 100 cores. The 'Practical challenges' paragraph discusses the 200 GHz clock, dispersion, synchronization, and TFLN wafer yield, but never mentions the core count. This is a central feasibility gap for the spatiotemporal route; without a path to ~10^6-core fiber, the claim that 'several approaches could plausibly reach' a million all-to-all spins is not supported for dense problems.
  2. [Section 3.3 / Fig. 4] The design says the Ising matrix elements 'are stored in a multicore fiber loop' and describes readout via outcoupling, but no mechanism is given for writing or reconfiguring the 10^12 coupling-matrix elements. A recirculating delay-line memory with no load/update path cannot serve as a reconfigurable general-purpose Ising machine, which the paper itself lists as a key requirement (Box 2b). The authors should either specify a weight-loading scheme (e.g., parallel write-in couplers or per-core modulation) or explicitly restrict the claim to fixed, pre-programmed instances.
  3. [Section 3.1–3.2] The other two routes do not currently establish arbitrary all-to-all million-spin capability. The chiplet example in Section 3.1 is explicitly for 'sparsely connected spins,' and the free-space route in Section 3.2 notes that Fourier-domain implementations are restricted to convolutional coupling matrices. The key-point claim of 'several approaches could plausibly reach this scale' should be qualified to distinguish dense all-to-all problems (only Section 3.3 targets those) from sparse or convolutional problems, which have lower connectivity requirements.
  4. [Section 3.3 energy budget] The energy arithmetic is internally consistent: 10^12 pulses at 4 fJ/pulse in a 5 µs round trip gives 800 W circulating power; the 20 dB SNR overhead implies 80 kW circulating power, and at 10% round-trip loss the dissipated power is 8 kW, yielding 40 fJ/MAC. The text is easy to misread, however, because it jumps from '800 W total circulating power' to 'the total power dissipated is about 8 kW' without explicitly stating the factor-of-100 increase in circulating power. Clarifying this step would strengthen the presentation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract / Key points] The phrase 'Several approaches could plausibly reach this scale and beyond' is repeated in the key points and conclusion; given the qualifications in Sections 3.1–3.3, the authors may want to add a qualifier such as 'for suitable connectivity classes' to avoid overstating the current evidence.
  2. [Table 1] The table mixes 'spins' with 'nodes' and 'N' without a consistent notation; e.g., '2×10^3' and '>10^4' entries. Also, the column header 'Re. Coupling' is unclear—spell out 'Reconfigurable coupling' in the header or use a footnote.
  3. [Section 3.3] The sentence 'However, CMOS electronics, where dense integration is important to mitigate the energy-cost and heating issues associated with electrical interconnects between chips, an all-optical architecture...' is grammatically incomplete. It should be rephrased to compare the on-chip integration penalty in CMOS with the proposed optical chiplet approach.
  4. [Section 2.2] There is a duplicated word: 'spins spins' in the sentence 'free-space photonic Ising machines have been demonstrated at scales exceeding N> 10,000 spins spins with all-to-all connectivity.'
  5. [References] Several reference entries contain typographical artifacts (e.g., 'Y oshihisa Yamamoto', 'V .', and 'T Y po' in ref. 159). These should be cleaned up before publication.
  6. [Figure 1] The spider chart legend uses 'L', 'M', 'H' without a scale; consider adding a short caption defining these as Low/Medium/High or a numeric axis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a perspective that surveys independently demonstrated photonic Ising machines and its roadmap estimates are arithmetic projections, not fitted predictions.

full rationale

The manuscript does not derive a quantitative prediction from a fitted parameter and then report that prediction as an independent result. Its central claim—"Several approaches could plausibly reach this scale and beyond"—is a qualitative roadmap assessment, supported by surveys of existing demonstrations (e.g., refs. 29, 42, 44, 46, 59) that are externally checkable hardware results rather than self-referential proofs. The self-citations (notably ref. 29 by co-author Al-Kayed and ref. 42 by co-author McMahon) appear as state-of-the-art examples in Table 1 and Fig. 1, not as load-bearing derivations of the million-spin feasibility claim. The Section 3.3 power estimate is internally consistent arithmetic: 10^12 pulses at 4 fJ each gives 4 mJ per circulation, and at a ~5 microsecond round trip this is ~800 W, exactly what the text states. The 40 fJ/MAC and 8 kW figures follow from the stated SNR/tap assumptions, so they are not circular fits. The architecture's feasibility limitations—N parallel TFLN cores, wafer yield, dispersion, synchronization, and the absence of a described weight-loading mechanism—are substantive engineering risks, but the paper flags several of them ("engineering challenges of achieving large-scale wafer uniformity and yield remain formidable") and these concerns belong to correctness/feasibility assessment, not to circular derivation. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. The roadmap is constructive and its assumptions are stated rather than assumed through the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a perspective; no data are fitted. The listed 'free parameters' are engineering assumptions used in the Section 3.3 back-of-envelope budget and in the chiplet/free-space feasibility arguments. The axioms are the core physical and engineering premises the roadmap rests on. No new physical entities—particles, forces, or conserved quantities—are introduced; the spatiotemporal processor is a proposed arrangement of existing components.

free parameters (6)
  • Multicore fiber attenuation = 0.2 dB/km
    Assumed in Section 3.3 to compute a 5% roundtrip loss and the associated power budget; not demonstrated for an N-core fiber.
  • SNR target for 8-bit precision = 50 dB
    Assumed in Section 3.3; maps to 25,000 photons/pulse and 4 fJ/pulse.
  • Roundtrip SNR overhead for 1000 roundtrips = 20 dB
    Assumed in Section 3.3 to size the DOPA power needed to sustain the optical memory.
  • Optical clock rate = 200 GHz
    Assumed in Section 3.3 for the million-node spatiotemporal machine; cited from ref 179 as beyond 100 GHz but not demonstrated in this system.
  • TFLN DOPA gain = 55 dB/cm/W^{1/2}
    Taken from refs 176-177 and used to size the fanout compensation power.
  • SFG conversion factor in accumulator = ~0.001
    Assumed in Section 3.3 based on a 400 µm TFLN waveguide and ~0.2 mW weight pulses; no end-to-end precision budget is provided.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DOPO and coupled-laser dynamics converge to low-energy Ising configurations
    Invoked in Box 1 and Section 3.2; required for all-optical and laser-array routes, but convergence to ground states is not guaranteed for large frustrated instances.
  • ad hoc to paper An N-core multicore fiber with N about 10^6 is physically realizable
    Section 3.3 needs one spatial channel per spin; demonstrated multicore fibers have about 10^2 cores.
  • domain assumption SFG/DFG accumulator performs accurate MACs at 200 GHz without error accumulation
    Section 3.3; the SFG process has small conversion (~0.001) and no end-to-end noise or precision budget is provided.
  • domain assumption Chiplet decomposition preserves the original Ising ground-state structure
    Section 3.1, refs 19, 48, 118; inter-chiplet communication overhead and subproblem mapping can alter dynamics.
  • domain assumption Coupling matrices can be programmed to ~8-bit precision in large photonic MVMs
    Box 2 and Table 1 list ~8-bit coupling for photonic platforms, but precision degrades with scale, and the paper does not provide an error budget for million-node systems.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Photonic Ising machines toward and beyond a million spins." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7KY52NAN

@misc{pith2026260713446,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Photonic Ising machines toward and beyond a million spins},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7KY52NAN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13446}
}
read the original abstract

Combinatorial optimization problems are central to many challenges in logistics, finance, engineering, and the life sciences, yet they remain among the most computationally demanding. Many of these problems can be mapped onto the Ising model, in which binary spins interact through a network of couplings, and solutions correspond to low-energy, ideally ground-state, spin configurations. Photonic Ising machines have the potential to be fast and energy-efficient heuristic solvers of optimization problems by leveraging the low latency, high bandwidth, and inherent parallelism of optics. However, current photonic implementations remain limited in scalability, connectivity, reconfigurability, and time-to-solution, preventing their use in many practical applications. In this perspective, we examine the current landscape of photonic Ising machines, discuss the challenges and limitations of existing platforms, and identify the scientific and technological advances needed to realize large-scale systems. These developments could establish photonic Ising machines as useful hardware platforms for practical optimization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.13446 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Recent progress and the roadmaps toward million-node Ising machines: Photonic Ising machines have been implemented using various approaches. The figure represents the fiber-based, free-space, and integrated photonic architectures. a) Shows the implementation of two different fiber-based CIMs using time-division￾multiplexed OPOs with measurement and feedback signals42 and optoelectronic parametric oscillators43 . b) … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Photonic chiplet Ising architecture: A conceptual on-chip processor utilizing commercially available photonic technologies. The programmable processor integrates on-chip photonic components, co-integration, packaging, and I/O strategies. a) Optical non-volatile analog memory made of phase-change materials. b) Flip-chip bonded ASIC on photonic integrated circuit for wirebond-free electronic control. The ASIC configur… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spatially multiplexed photonic Ising architecture: a) An all-optical Ising machine architecture implemented using optical spin encoding, optical MVM, and optical feedback. b) Optical spin encoding realized through either degenerate OPOs or laser encoding, where the gain-based system naturally converges to minimum￾energy spin configurations. c) Large-scale all-optical free-space MVM achieved using spatial multiplexin… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: All-optical coherent spatiotemporal architecture: a) Schematic of the All-optical coherent spatiotem￾poral architecture implemented using time- and spatial-multiplexed configurations. b) Fiber-based optical memory used for storing large spin and coupling matrices. c) S…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

155 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Papadimitriou, C. H. & Steiglitz, K.Combinatorial optimization: Algorithms and complexity(Dover Publica- tions, 1998). 2.Hochba, D. S. Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems.ACM SIGACT News28, 40–52 (1997). 3.Cook, W. J., Applegate, D. L., Bixby, R. E. & Chvatal, V .The traveling salesman problem: A computational study(Princeton University Press, 2011)

  2. [4]

    Mantegna, R. N. & Stanley, H. E.Introduction to econophysics: Correlations and complexity in finance (Cambridge university press, 1999)

  3. [5]

    & Komatsuzaki, T

    Mizuno, Y . & Komatsuzaki, T. Finding optimal pathways in chemical reaction networks using Ising machines. Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013115 (2024). 6.Liu, Q.et al.DNA computing on surfaces.Nature403, 175–179 (2000)

  4. [7]

    B., Decornez, H., Furr, J

    Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H., Furr, J. R. & Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications.Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.3, 935–949 (2004)

  5. [8]

    & Reinelt, G

    Barahona, F., Grötschel, M., Jünger, M. & Reinelt, G. An application of combinatorial optimization to statistical physics and circuit layout design.Oper. Res.36, 493–513 (1988)

  6. [9]

    Smith, K. A. Neural networks for combinatorial optimization: A review of more than a decade of research. Informs J. on Comput.11, 15–34 (1999). 10.Chakraa, H., Guérin, F., Leclercq, E. & Lefebvre, D. Optimization techniques for multi-robot task allocation problems: Review on the state-of-the-art.Robotics Auton. Syst.104492 (2023)

  7. [11]

    Ising, E.Beitrag zur theorie des ferro-und paramagnetismus. Ph.D. thesis, Grefe & Tiedemann Hamburg (1924). 12.Strachan, J. P. Fast Ising solvers based on oscillator networks.Nat. electronics4, 458–459 (2021)

  8. [13]

    Mohseni, N., McMahon, P. L. & Byrnes, T. Ising machines as hardware solvers of combinatorial optimization problems.Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 363–379 (2022). 14.Johnson, M. W.et al.Quantum annealing with manufactured spins.Nature473, 194–198 (2011)

Show all 155 references
  1. [15]

    & Pedram, M

    Razmkhah, S., Kamal, M., Yoshikawa, N. & Pedram, M. Josephson parametric oscillator based Ising machine. Phys. Rev. B109, 014511 (2024). 16.Kim, K.et al.Quantum simulation of frustrated Ising spins with trapped ions.Nature465, 590–593 (2010)

  2. [17]

    & Yamaguchi, H

    Mahboob, I., Okamoto, H. & Yamaguchi, H. An electromechanical Ising hamiltonian.Sci. Adv.2, e1600236 (2016)

  3. [18]

    Yamaoka, M.et al.A 20k-spin Ising chip to solve combinatorial optimization problems with CMOS annealing. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits51, 303–309 (2015)

  4. [19]

    & Goto, H

    Tatsumura, K., Yamasaki, M. & Goto, H. Scaling out Ising machines using a multi-chip architecture for simulated bifurcation.Nat. Electron.4, 208–217 (2021)

  5. [20]

    Electron.3, 409–418 (2020)

    Cai, F.et al.Power-efficient combinatorial optimization using intrinsic noise in memristor Hopfield neural networks.Nat. Electron.3, 409–418 (2020)

  6. [21]

    Jiang, M., Shan, K., He, C. & Li, C. Efficient combinatorial optimization by quantum-inspired parallel annealing in analogue memristor crossbar.Nat. Commun.14, 5927 (2023)

  7. [22]

    Hizzani, M.et al.Memristor-based hardware and algorithms for higher-order Hopfield optimization solver outperforming quadratic Ising machines.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01171(2023)

  8. [23]

    Kalinin, K. P. & Berloff, N. G. Simulating Ising andn-state planar potts models and external fields with nonequilibrium condensates.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 235302 (2018). 21/29

  9. [24]

    P., Amo, A., Bloch, J

    Kalinin, K. P., Amo, A., Bloch, J. & Berloff, N. G. Polaritonic XY-Ising machine.Nanophotonics9, 4127–4138 (2020)

  10. [25]

    I.et al.Ultrafast Ising machines using spin torque nano-oscillators.Appl

    Albertsson, D. I.et al.Ultrafast Ising machines using spin torque nano-oscillators.Appl. Phys. Lett.118 (2021)

  11. [26]

    Houshang, A.et al.Phase-binarized spin hall nano-oscillator arrays: Towards spin hall Ising machines.Phys. Rev. Appl.17, 014003 (2022)

  12. [27]

    Y ., Behin-Aein, B

    Sutton, B., Camsari, K. Y ., Behin-Aein, B. & Datta, S. Intrinsic optimization using stochastic nanomagnets. Sci. Reports7, 44370 (2017). 28.Gao, Y .et al.Photonic Ising machines for combinatorial optimization problems.Appl. Phys. Rev.11(2024)

  13. [29]

    Al-Kayed, N.et al.Programmable 200 GOPS Hopfield-inspired photonic Ising machine.Nature648, 576–584 (2025)

  14. [30]

    Yao, J., Zhu, R. & Yu, J. Enhanced, fully connected 360 000-spin spatial photonic Ising machine.Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 044087 (2025)

  15. [31]

    & Togawa, N

    Bao, S., Tawada, M., Tanaka, S. & Togawa, N. An Ising-machine-based solver of vehicle routing problem with balanced pick-up.IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electron.70, 445–459 (2023)

  16. [32]

    Lee, H., Kim, J. P. & Kim, S. Fundamental challenges, physical implementations, and integration strategies for Ising machines in large-scale optimization tasks.Adv. Electron. Mater.e00682 (2026)

  17. [33]

    Commun.15, 3457 (2024)

    Si, J.et al.Energy-efficient superparamagnetic Ising machine and its application to traveling salesman problems.Nat. Commun.15, 3457 (2024)

  18. [34]

    & Peterson, C

    Irbäck, A., Knuthson, L., Mohanty, S. & Peterson, C. Folding lattice proteins with quantum annealing.Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043013 (2022)

  19. [35]

    P.et al.Analog optical computer for AI inference and combinatorial optimization.Nature1–8 (2025)

    Kalinin, K. P.et al.Analog optical computer for AI inference and combinatorial optimization.Nature1–8 (2025). 36.NVIDIA. NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU Architecture. Whitepaper, NVIDIA (2023)

  20. [37]

    & Yamaoka, M

    Yamamoto, K., Takemoto, T., Yoshimura, C., Mashimo, M. & Yamaoka, M. A 1.3-Mbit annealing system com- posed of fully-synchronized 9-board x 9-chip x 16-kbit annealing processor chips for large-scale combinatorial optimization problems. In2021 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Co...

  21. [38]

    Zhang, T.et al.A review of Ising machines implemented in conventional and emerging technologies.IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnol.23, 1 (2024)

  22. [39]

    Zhou, H.et al.Photonic matrix multiplication lights up photonic accelerator and beyond.Light. Sci. & Appl. 11, 30 (2022)

  23. [40]

    Aramon, M.et al.Physics-inspired optimization for quadratic unconstrained problems using a digital annealer. Front. Phys.7, 48 (2019). 41.Lucas, A. Ising formulations of many NP problems.Front. physics2, 5 (2014)

  24. [42]

    L.et al.A fully programmable 100-spin coherent Ising machine with all-to-all connections

    McMahon, P. L.et al.A fully programmable 100-spin coherent Ising machine with all-to-all connections. Science354, 614–617 (2016)

  25. [43]

    Cen, Q.et al.Large-scale coherent Ising machine based on optoelectronic parametric oscillator.Light. Sci. & Appl.11, 333 (2022)

  26. [44]

    & Conti, C

    Pierangeli, D., Marcucci, G. & Conti, C. Large-scale photonic Ising machine by spatial light modulation.Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 213902 (2019)

  27. [45]

    Pal, V ., Mahler, S., Tradonsky, C., Friesem, A. A. & Davidson, N. Rapid fair sampling of the XY spin hamiltonian with a laser simulator.Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033008 (2020). 22/29

  28. [46]

    Hua, S.et al.An integrated large-scale photonic accelerator with ultralow latency.Nature640, 361–367 (2025)

  29. [47]

    In2021 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), vol

    Takemoto, T.et al.4.6 A 144kb annealing system composed of 9× 16kb annealing processor chips with scalable chip-to-chip connections for large-scale combinatorial optimization problems. In2021 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), vol. 64, 64–66 (IEEE, 2021)

  30. [48]

    & Huang, M

    Sharma, A., Afoakwa, R., Ignjatovic, Z. & Huang, M. Increasing Ising machine capacity with multi-chip architectures. InProceedings of the 49th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 508–521 (2022)

  31. [49]

    & Conti, C

    Calvanese Strinati, M., Pierangeli, D. & Conti, C. All-optical scalable spatial coherent Ising machine.Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 054022 (2021)

  32. [50]

    Commun.13, 123 (2022)

    Wang, T.et al.An optical neural network using less than 1 photon per multiplication.Nat. Commun.13, 123 (2022)

  33. [51]

    & Honjo, T

    Takesue, H., Inagaki, T., Inaba, K., Ikuta, T. & Honjo, T. Large-scale coherent Ising machine.J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 061014 (2019)

  34. [52]

    Yue, W.et al.A scalable universal Ising machine based on interaction-centric storage and compute-in-memory. Nat. Electron.7, 904–913 (2024)

  35. [53]

    Electron.1–10 (2025)

    Cılasun, H.et al.A coupled-oscillator-based Ising chip for combinatorial optimization.Nat. Electron.1–10 (2025)

  36. [54]

    Commun.15, 3334 (2024)

    Maher, O.et al.A CMOS-Compatible oscillation-based VO 2 Ising machine solver.Nat. Commun.15, 3334 (2024)

  37. [55]

    & Han, J

    Zhang, T., Tao, Q., Liu, B. & Han, J. A review of simulation algorithms of classical Ising machines for combinatorial optimization. In2022 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 1877– 1881 (IEEE, 2022)

  38. [56]

    Photonics10, 415–419 (2016)

    Inagaki, T.et al.Large-scale Ising spin network based on degenerate optical parametric oscillators.Nat. Photonics10, 415–419 (2016)

  39. [57]

    & Inagaki, T

    Takesue, H. & Inagaki, T. 10 GHz clock time-multiplexed degenerate optical parametric oscillators for a photonic Ising spin network.Opt. Lett.41, 4273–4276 (2016)

  40. [58]

    V ., Verschaffelt, G

    Böhm, F., Vaerenbergh, T. V ., Verschaffelt, G. & Van der Sande, G. Order-of-magnitude differences in computational performance of analog Ising machines induced by the choice of nonlinearity.Commun. Phys.4, 149 (2021). 59.Honjo, T.et al.100,000-spin coherent Ising machine.Sci....

  41. [61]

    & Van der Sande, G

    Böhm, F., Verschaffelt, G. & Van der Sande, G. A poor man’s coherent Ising machine based on opto-electronic feedback systems for solving optimization problems.Nat. Commun.10, 3538 (2019). 62.Jin, Y .et al.Combinatorial optimization with kerr solitons.Sci. Adv.12, eaeb7930 (2026)

  42. [63]

    Quinn, L.et al.Coherent Ising machine based on polarization symmetry breaking in a driven Kerr resonator. Nat. Commun.(2026)

  43. [64]

    Hu, Z.et al.Programmable optoelectronic Ising machine for optimization of real-world problems.Light. Sci. & Appl.15, 6 (2026)

  44. [65]

    & Conti, C

    Pierangeli, D., Marcucci, G. & Conti, C. Adiabatic evolution on a spatial-photonic Ising machine.Optica7, 1535–1543 (2020)

  45. [66]

    Commun.10, 3516 (2019)

    Babaeian, M.et al.A single shot coherent Ising machine based on a network of injection-locked multicore fiber lasers.Nat. Commun.10, 3516 (2019). 23/29

  46. [67]

    Phys.7, 168 (2024)

    Ouyang, J.et al.On-demand photonic Ising machine with simplified Hamiltonian calculation by phase encoding and intensity detection.Commun. Phys.7, 168 (2024)

  47. [68]

    Ye, X., Zhang, W., Wang, S., Yang, X. & He, Z. Photonic spatial-Euler Ising machine for solving 20000-node max-cut problem.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04651(2023)

  48. [69]

    & Huang, Y .-P

    Kumar, S., Zhang, H. & Huang, Y .-P. Large-scale Ising emulation with four body interaction and all-to-all connections.Commun. Phys.3, 108 (2020)

  49. [70]

    & Ruan, Z

    Luo, L., Mi, Z., Huang, J. & Ruan, Z. Wavelength-division multiplexing optical Ising simulator enabling fully programmable spin couplings and external magnetic fields.Sci. Adv.9, eadg6238 (2023)

  50. [71]

    & Gigan, S

    Pierangeli, D., Rafayelyan, M., Conti, C. & Gigan, S. Scalable spin-glass optical simulator.Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 034087 (2021)

  51. [72]

    Ouyang, J.et al.Programmable and reconfigurable photonic simulator for classical XY models.Phys. Rev. Appl.22, L021001 (2024)

  52. [73]

    & Ruan, Z

    Fang, Y ., Huang, J. & Ruan, Z. Experimental observation of phase transitions in spatial photonic Ising machine. Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 043902 (2021)

  53. [74]

    Nixon, M., Ronen, E., Friesem, A. A. & Davidson, N. Observing geometric frustration with thousands of coupled lasers.Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 184102 (2013)

  54. [75]

    76.Wu, B.et al.A monolithically integrated optical Ising machine.Nat

    Gershenzon, I.et al.Exact mapping between a laser network loss rate and the classical XY hamiltonian by laser loss control.Nanophotonics9, 4117–4126 (2020). 76.Wu, B.et al.A monolithically integrated optical Ising machine.Nat. Commun.16, 4296 (2025). 77.Liu, X.et al.Chip-scale...

  55. [78]

    R.et al.Ising accelerator with a reconfigurable interferometric photonic processor.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.13284(2025)

    Rausell-Campo, J. R.et al.Ising accelerator with a reconfigurable interferometric photonic processor.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.13284(2025)

  56. [79]

    Prabhu, M.et al.Accelerating recurrent Ising machines in photonic integrated circuits.Optica7, 551–558 (2020)

  57. [80]

    Li, Z.et al.Scalable on-chip optoelectronic Ising machine utilizing thin-film Lithium Niobate photonics.ACS Photonics11, 1703–1714 (2024)

  58. [81]

    Tezak, N.et al.Integrated coherent Ising machines based on self-phase modulation in microring resonators. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.26, 1–15 (2019)

  59. [82]

    Zhu, H.et al.A dynamically programmable quantum photonic microprocessor for graph computation.Laser & Photonics Rev.18, 2300304 (2024)

  60. [83]

    & Zhang, X

    Wu, B., Zhou, H., Dong, J. & Zhang, X. Programmable integrated photonic coherent matrix: Principle, configuring, and applications.Appl. Phys. Rev.11(2024)

  61. [84]

    P., Dede, E

    Wang, J., Rodrigues, S. P., Dede, E. M. & Fan, S. Microring-based programmable coherent optical neural networks.Opt. Express31, 18871–18887 (2023)

  62. [85]

    Inagaki, T.et al.A coherent Ising machine for 2000-node optimization problems.Science354, 603–606 (2016)

  63. [86]

    & Frignac, Y

    Mwamsojo, N., Lehmann, F., Merghem, K., Benkelfat, B.-E. & Frignac, Y . Optoelectronic coherent Ising machine for combinatorial optimization problems.Opt. Lett.48, 2150–2153 (2023)

  64. [87]

    Marandi, A., Wang, Z., Takata, K., Byer, R. L. & Yamamoto, Y . Network of time-multiplexed optical parametric oscillators as a coherent Ising machine.Nat. Photonics8, 937–942 (2014)

  65. [88]

    Reports6, 34089 (2016)

    Takata, K.et al.A 16-bit coherent Ising machine for one-dimensional ring and cubic graph problems.Sci. Reports6, 34089 (2016). 24/29

  66. [89]

    & Conti, C

    Pierangeli, D., Marcucci, G., Brunner, D. & Conti, C. Noise-enhanced spatial-photonic Ising machine. Nanophotonics9, 4109–4116 (2020)

  67. [90]

    & Ruan, Z

    Huang, J., Fang, Y . & Ruan, Z. Antiferromagnetic spatial photonic Ising machine through optoelectronic correlation computing.Commun. Phys.4, 242 (2021)

  68. [91]

    Sun, W., Zhang, W., Liu, Y ., Liu, Q. & He, Z. Quadrature photonic spatial Ising machine.Opt. Lett.47, 1498 (2022)

  69. [92]

    & Danner, A

    Gao, Y ., Qi, L., Lin, H.-L., Fu, W. & Danner, A. All-optical interferometer-based Ising machine.Optica12, 831–840 (2025)

  70. [93]

    Commun.11, 4119 (2020)

    Okawachi, Y .et al.Demonstration of chip-based coupled degenerate optical parametric oscillators for realizing a nanophotonic spin-glass.Nat. Commun.11, 4119 (2020)

  71. [94]

    95.Su, Y .et al.Scalability of large-scale photonic integrated circuits.ACS Photonics(2023)

    Ouyang, J.et al.16-channel photonic solver for optimization problems on a silicon chip.Chip4, 100117 (2025). 95.Su, Y .et al.Scalability of large-scale photonic integrated circuits.ACS Photonics(2023)

  72. [96]

    Albertsson, D. I. & Rusu, A. Highly reconfigurable oscillator-based Ising machine through quasiperiodic modulation of coupling strength.Sci. Reports13, 4005 (2023)

  73. [97]

    A.et al.Massively parallel probabilistic computing with sparse Ising machines.Nat

    Aadit, N. A.et al.Massively parallel probabilistic computing with sparse Ising machines.Nat. Electron.5, 460–468 (2022)

  74. [98]

    & Grimm, D

    Pirnay, J. & Grimm, D. G. Self-improvement for neural combinatorial optimization: Sample without replace- ment, but improvement.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15180(2024)

  75. [99]

    & Roudi, Y

    Bachschmid-Romano, L., Battistin, C., Opper, M. & Roudi, Y . Variational perturbation and extended plefka approaches to dynamics on random networks: The case of the kinetic Ising model.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 434003 (2016). 100.Lim, Y ., Lee, S. & Jo, J. Data augmentation...

  76. [101]

    & Fong, X

    Cen, Y ., Das, D. & Fong, X. A tree search algorithm towards solving Ising formulated combinatorial optimization problems.Sci. Reports12, 14755 (2022)

  77. [102]

    Fan, Z., Lin, J., Dai, J., Zhang, T. & Xu, K. Photonic Hopfield neural network for the Ising problem.Opt. Express31, 21340–21350 (2023)

  78. [103]

    Leleu, T.et al.Scaling advantage of chaotic amplitude control for high-performance combinatorial optimization. Commun. Phys.4, 266 (2021)

  79. [104]

    Commun.9, 5020 (2018)

    Böhm, F.et al.Understanding dynamics of coherent Ising machines through simulation of large-scale 2D Ising models.Nat. Commun.9, 5020 (2018)

  80. [105]

    Kalinin, K. P. & Berloff, N. G. Computational complexity continuum within Ising formulation of NP problems. Commun. Phys.5, 20 (2022)

  81. [106]

    & Wilson, M

    Cossu, G., Del Debbio, L., Giani, T., Khamseh, A. & Wilson, M. Machine learning determination of dynamical parameters: The Ising model case.Phys. Rev. B100, 064304 (2019)

  82. [107]

    M., Sörensen, K., San Segundo, P., Kleinebrahm, M

    Weinand, J. M., Sörensen, K., San Segundo, P., Kleinebrahm, M. & McKenna, R. Research trends in combinatorial optimization.Int. Transactions Oper. Res.29, 667–705 (2022)

  83. [108]

    Ng, E.et al.Efficient sampling of ground and low-energy Ising spin configurations with a coherent Ising machine.Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013009 (2022)

  84. [109]

    & Verschaffelt, G

    Sevenants, T., Van der Sande, G. & Verschaffelt, G. Requirements on bit resolution in optical Ising machine implementations with analog spin variables.Commun. Phys.8, 11 (2025). 25/29

  85. [110]

    S., Babu, C

    Dara, S., Dhamercherla, S., Jadav, S. S., Babu, C. M. & Ahsan, M. J. Machine learning in drug discovery: A review.Artif. Intell. Rev.55, 1947–1999 (2022)

  86. [111]

    & Soeda, T

    Ofuchi, M., Jippo, H., Sato, H. & Soeda, T. Digital annealer applications in the chemical and pharmaceutical fields. High-speed solving of combinatorial optimization problems.Oyo Buturi (Online)90, 499–503 (2021)

  87. [112]

    P., Rees, S., Kalindjian, S

    Hughes, J. P., Rees, S., Kalindjian, S. B. & Philpott, K. L. Principles of early drug discovery.Br. J. Pharmacol. 162, 1239–1249 (2011)

  88. [113]

    114.Torquato, S

    Xiong, Z.et al.Q-drug: A framework to bring drug design into quantum space using deep learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.13171(2023). 114.Torquato, S. Toward an Ising model of cancer and beyond.Phys. biology8, 015017 (2011)

  89. [115]

    P-bits and application of P-bit-based Ising models to protein folding and molecular docking problems

    Liang, G. P-bits and application of P-bit-based Ising models to protein folding and molecular docking problems. InElectrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts 248, 36, 1751–1751 (The Electrochemical Society, Inc., 2025)

  90. [116]

    & Tatsumura, K

    Kashimata, T., Yamasaki, M., Hidaka, R. & Tatsumura, K. Efficient and scalable architecture for multiple-chip implementation of simulated bifurcation machines.IEEE Access12, 36606–36621 (2024)

  91. [117]

    & Danner, A

    Lan, Y ., Chen, G., Gao, Y ., Fu, W. & Danner, A. J. An integrated all-optical Ising machine with unlimited spin array size and coupling.Adv. Photonics Res.5, 2400004 (2024)

  92. [118]

    Xu, Z.et al.Large-scale photonic chiplet Taichi empowers 160-TOPS/W artificial general intelligence.Science 384, 202–209 (2024)

  93. [119]

    & Yan, S

    Pan, Y ., Lai, H., Liu, C. & Yan, S. A divide-and-conquer method for scalable low-rank latent matrix pursuit. InProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 524–531 (2013)

  94. [120]

    Divide and conquer

    Izadkhah, H. Divide and conquer. InProblems on Algorithms: A Comprehensive Exercise Book for Students in Software Engineering, 351–400 (Springer, 2022)

  95. [121]

    Yang, G., Karimi, S., Ocampo, C. A. R., Coskun, A. K. & Joshi, A. Sophie: A scalable recurrent Ising machine using optically addressed phase change memory. In2024 57th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO), 1548–1561 (IEEE, 2024)

  96. [122]

    J.et al.Photonics for artificial intelligence and neuromorphic computing.Nat

    Shastri, B. J.et al.Photonics for artificial intelligence and neuromorphic computing.Nat. Photonics15, 102–114 (2021)

  97. [123]

    In2023 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 1–4 (IEEE, 2023)

    Shi, J.et al.An 800g integrated silicon-photonic transmitter based on 16-channel mach-zehnder modulator and co-designed 5.35 pj/bit cmos drivers. In2023 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 1–4 (IEEE, 2023)

  98. [124]

    & Bowers, J

    Xiang, C. & Bowers, J. E. Building 3D integrated circuits with electronics and photonics.Nat. Electron.7, 422–424 (2024)

  99. [125]

    J., Huang, D

    Zheng, X., Marchand, P. J., Huang, D. & Esener, S. C. Free-space parallel multichip interconnection system. Appl. Opt.39, 3516–3524 (2000)

  100. [126]

    Spatial photonic Ising machine with time/space division multiplexing

    Ogura, Y . Spatial photonic Ising machine with time/space division multiplexing. InPhotonic Neural Networks with Spatiotemporal Dynamics: Paradigms of Computing and Implementation, 153–174 (Springer Nature Singapore Singapore, 2023)

  101. [127]

    & Michel, J

    Zhou, Z., Yin, B. & Michel, J. On-chip light sources for silicon photonics.Light. Sci. & Appl.4, e358 (2015). 128.Zhou, Z.et al.Prospects and applications of on-chip lasers.eLight3, 1–25 (2023)

  102. [129]

    Chen, C.-H.et al.A comb laser-driven DWDM silicon photonic transmitter based on microring modulators. Opt. Express23, 21541–21548 (2015)

  103. [130]

    Kovaios, S.et al.On-chip 1 tops hyperdimensional photonic tensor core using a wdm silicon photonic coherent crossbar.J. Light. Technol.(2025). 26/29

  104. [131]

    J., Holzwarth, R

    Kippenberg, T. J., Holzwarth, R. & Diddams, S. A. Microresonator-based optical frequency combs.Science 332, 555–559 (2011)

  105. [132]

    L., Lipson, M

    Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Kippenberg, T. J. Photonic-chip-based frequency combs.Nat. Photonics13, 158–169 (2019)

  106. [133]

    & Bowers, J

    Chang, L., Liu, S. & Bowers, J. E. Integrated optical frequency comb technologies.Nat. Photonics16, 95–108 (2022)

  107. [134]

    & Zhu, L

    Porter, C., Zeng, S., Zhao, X. & Zhu, L. Hybrid integrated chip-scale laser systems.APL Photonics8(2023)

  108. [135]

    R.et al.Hybrid integration of silicon photonics circuits and InP lasers by photonic wire bonding

    Billah, M. R.et al.Hybrid integration of silicon photonics circuits and InP lasers by photonic wire bonding. Optica5, 876–883 (2018)

  109. [136]

    & Klamkin, J

    Song, B., Stagarescu, C., Ristic, S., Behfar, A. & Klamkin, J. 3D integrated hybrid silicon laser.Opt. Express 24, 10435–10444 (2016)

  110. [137]

    Express26, 7920–7933 (2018)

    Guan, H.et al.Widely-tunable, narrow-linewidth III-V/silicon hybrid external-cavity laser for coherent communication.Opt. Express26, 7920–7933 (2018)

  111. [138]

    Lett.43, 4867–4870 (2018)

    Wang, M.et al.Eight-channel laser array with 100 GHz channel spacing based on surface-slotted structures fabricated by standard lithography.Opt. Lett.43, 4867–4870 (2018)

  112. [139]

    Express26, 8821–8830 (2018)

    Zhang, J.et al.Transfer-printing-based integration of a III-V-on-silicon distributed feedback laser.Opt. Express26, 8821–8830 (2018)

  113. [140]

    Y .et al.Reliability of InAs/GaAs quantum dot lasers epitaxially grown on silicon.IEEE J

    Liu, A. Y .et al.Reliability of InAs/GaAs quantum dot lasers epitaxially grown on silicon.IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.21, 690–697 (2015)

  114. [141]

    Feldmann, J.et al.Parallel convolutional processing using an integrated photonic tensor core.Nature589, 52–58 (2021)

  115. [142]

    Cheng, J.et al.A small microring array that performs large complex-valued matrix-vector multiplication. Front. Optoelectronics15, 15 (2022)

  116. [143]

    A.et al.Photonic multiply-accumulate operations for neural networks.IEEE J

    Nahmias, M. A.et al.Photonic multiply-accumulate operations for neural networks.IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.26, 1–18 (2019)

  117. [144]

    H.et al.A 2.4 pj/b 100Gb/s 3D-integrated PAM-4 optical transmitter with segmented SiP MOSCAP modulators and a 2-channel 28nm CMOS driver

    Talkhooncheh, A. H.et al.A 2.4 pj/b 100Gb/s 3D-integrated PAM-4 optical transmitter with segmented SiP MOSCAP modulators and a 2-channel 28nm CMOS driver. In2022 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), vol. 65, 284–286 (IEEE, 2022)

  118. [145]

    J.et al.110 GHz CMOS compatible thin film LiNbO3 modulator on silicon.Opt

    Mercante, A. J.et al.110 GHz CMOS compatible thin film LiNbO3 modulator on silicon.Opt. Express24, 15590–15595 (2016). 146.Dong, B.et al.Partial coherence enhances parallelized photonic computing.Nature632, 55–62 (2024)

  119. [147]

    N.et al.Neuromorphic photonic networks using silicon photonic weight banks.Sci

    Tait, A. N.et al.Neuromorphic photonic networks using silicon photonic weight banks.Sci. Reports7, 7430 (2017). 148.Tait, A. N.et al.Silicon photonic modulator neuron.Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 064043 (2019)

  120. [149]

    A.et al.Reprogrammable electro-optic nonlinear activation functions for optical neural networks.IEEE J

    Williamson, I. A.et al.Reprogrammable electro-optic nonlinear activation functions for optical neural networks.IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.26, 1–12 (2019)

  121. [150]

    Express27, 9620–9630 (2019)

    Mourgias-Alexandris, G.et al.An all-optical neuron with sigmoid activation function.Opt. Express27, 9620–9630 (2019)

  122. [151]

    & Chen, X

    Che, D. & Chen, X. Modulation format and digital signal processing for im-dd optics at post-200g era.J. Light. Technol.42, 588–605 (2024)

  123. [152]

    & Kawahara, T

    Yamamoto, K. & Kawahara, T. Scalable fully coupled annealing processing system and multi-chip FPGA implementation.Microprocess. Microsystems95, 104674 (2022). 27/29

  124. [153]

    W., Dias, A

    Goodman, J. W., Dias, A. & Woody, L. Fully parallel, high-speed incoherent optical method for performing discrete fourier transforms.Opt. Lett.2, 1–3 (1978)

  125. [154]

    & Ichioka, Y

    Tanida, J. & Ichioka, Y . Optical logic array processor using shadowgrams.J. Opt. Soc. Am.73, 800–809 (1983)

  126. [155]

    Spall, J., Guo, X., Barrett, T. D. & Lvovsky, A. Fully reconfigurable coherent optical vector-matrix multiplica- tion.Opt. Lett.45, 5752–5755 (2020). 156.Davis, P. J.Circulant Matrices(Chelsea Publishing, New York, 1994), 2nd edn

  127. [157]

    eLight6, 10 (2026)

    Luo, M.et al.Highly scalable machine vision enabled with meta-optics-based ultra-wide neural network. eLight6, 10 (2026)

  128. [158]

    Park, J.-S.et al.All-glass 100 mm diameter visible metalens for imaging the cosmos.ACS Nano18, 3187–3198 (2024)

  129. [159]

    InPractical Holography XVII and Holographic Materials IX, vol

    Stanley, M.et al.100-megapixel computer-generated holographic images from Active Tiling: a dynamic and scalable electro-optic modulator system. InPractical Holography XVII and Holographic Materials IX, vol. 5005, 247–258 (SPIE, 2003)

  130. [160]

    Zhang, X.et al.Non-volatile trimming of photonic micro-rings using integrated and electrically programmable phase-change elements.Opt. Mater. Express16, 721–732 (2026)

  131. [161]

    Xu, L.et al.Building scalable silicon microring resonator-based neuromorphic photonic circuits using post-fabrication processing with photochromic material.Adv. Opt. Mater.13, 2402706 (2025)

  132. [162]

    & Yamamoto, Y

    Utsunomiya, S., Takata, K. & Yamamoto, Y . Mapping of Ising models onto injection-locked laser systems. Opt. express19, 18091–18108 (2011)

  133. [163]

    & Yamamoto, Y

    Takata, K. & Yamamoto, Y . Data search by a coherent Ising machine based on an injection-locked laser network with gradual pumping or coupling.Phys. Rev. A89, 032319 (2014). 164.Solli, D. R. & Jalali, B. Analog optical computing.Nat. Photonics9, 704–706 (2015)

  134. [165]

    Comput.2, 0006 (2023)

    Zhu, S.et al.Intelligent computing: The latest advances, challenges, and future.Intell. Comput.2, 0006 (2023). 166.Chen, Y .et al.All-analog photoelectronic chip for high-speed vision tasks.Nature623, 48–57 (2023)

  135. [167]

    GAEA-2.1 Phase Only LCOS-SLM

    Holoeye. GAEA-2.1 Phase Only LCOS-SLM. https://holoeye.com/products/spatial-light-modulators/ gaea-2-phase-only/ (2023)

  136. [168]

    Liu, Z.et al.Micro-light-emitting diodes with quantum dots in display technology.Light. Sci. & Appl.9, 83 (2020)

  137. [169]

    & Lahijani, B

    Carstensen, A. & Lahijani, B. V . Photonic-computing error correction through optical en-/decoder calibrations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.18299(2026). 170.Zhu, D.et al.Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate.Adv. Opt. Photonics13, 242–352 (2021)

  138. [171]

    Boes, A.et al.Lithium niobate photonics: Unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum.Science379, eabj4396 (2023)

  139. [172]

    100-core fibers.24th OptoElectronics Commun

    Mukasa, K. 100-core fibers.24th OptoElectronics Commun. Conf. (OECC) Int. Conf. on Photonics Switch. Comput. (PSC)IEEE 1–3 (2019). 173.Chen, W.et al.Applications and development of multi-core optical fibers.Photonics11, 270 (2024). 174.Reifenstein, S.et al.Coherent sat solvers...

  140. [175]

    H.et al.All-optical ultrafast ReLU function for energy-efficient nanophotonic deep learning.Nanopho- tonics12, 847–855 (2023)

    Li, G. H.et al.All-optical ultrafast ReLU function for energy-efficient nanophotonic deep learning.Nanopho- tonics12, 847–855 (2023). 28/29

  141. [176]

    & Fejer, M

    Jankowski, M., Mishra, J. & Fejer, M. Dispersion-engineered χ (2) nanophotonics: A flexible tool for nonclassical light.J. Physics: Photonics3, 042005 (2021). 177.Jankowski, M.et al.Quasi-static optical parametric amplification.Optica9, 273–279 (2022)

  142. [178]

    Jankowski, M.et al.Ultrafast second-order nonlinear photonics—from classical physics to non-gaussian quantum dynamics: a tutorial.Adv. Opt. Photonics16, 347–538 (2024)

  143. [179]

    H.et al.All-optical computing with beyond 100-GHz clock rates.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05756 (2025)

    Li, G. H.et al.All-optical computing with beyond 100-GHz clock rates.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05756 (2025). 180.Calvanese Strinati, M. & Conti, C. Multidimensional hyperspin machine.Nat. Commun.13, 7248 (2022)

  144. [181]

    & Pierangeli, D

    Chiavazzo, S., Calvanese Strinati, M., Conti, C. & Pierangeli, D. Ising machine by dimensional collapse of nonlinear polarization oscillators.Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 063801 (2025). 182.Bybee, C.et al.Efficient optimization with higher-order Ising machines.Nat. Commun.14, 6033 (2023)

  145. [183]

    Commun.(2026)

    Ahsan, F.et al.Higher-order neuromorphic Ising machines—autoencoders and Fowler-Nordheim annealers are all you need for scalability.Nat. Commun.(2026)

  146. [184]

    & Van Vaerenbergh, T

    De Prins, R., Van der Sande, G., Bienstman, P. & Van Vaerenbergh, T. How to incorporate higher-order interactions in analog ising machines.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.23621(2025)

  147. [185]

    N., Nahmias, M

    Tait, A. N., Nahmias, M. A., Shastri, B. J. & Prucnal, P. R. Broadcast and weight: An integrated network for scalable photonic spike processing.J. Light. Technol.32, 3427–3439 (2014). 29/29

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.