Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 47 references

Orientation Dynamics of Rigid Fibers in a Microfluidic Burgers-like Vortex

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a stretched vortex, rigid fibers exponentially align with the vortex axis while precessing at the local fluid rotation rate, a decoupled pair of motions captured by Jeffery's equations.

desk verdict Clean analytic result for fiber alignment in a Burgers vortex, with experimental evidence that is suggestive but less precise than the paper's inertial claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.14298 v2 pith:4TLJGK3D submitted 2026-07-15 physics.flu-dyn

Marine Aulnette , Mathis Coutadeur , Clément Bielinski , Blaise Delmotte , Anke Lindner This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords BurgersvortexJefferyequationsfiberorientationmicrofluidicsstretchingprecessionalignmentdynamicsrigidfibers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the orientation dynamics of a rigid fiber in a Burgers vortex—a stretched, stationary vortex that models the vortex tubes of turbulence—reduce to two decoupled motions: uniform precession around the vortex axis driven by fluid vorticity, and exponential alignment with the axis driven by strain. The authors derive from Jeffery's equations that tanβ decays as exp(−3κγt) and that the azimuthal angle advances at the local rotation rate, then confirm these laws against microfluidic experiments and bead-spring simulations. The result holds despite the flow being three-dimensional, at moderate Reynolds number, and not perfectly axisymmetric, and finite-size or inertial corrections remain weak. If correct, this offers a simple, parameter-free framework for predicting fiber orientation in vortical flows, relevant to turbulence, microplastic transport, and industrial fiber processing.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the combination of Jeffery's equation for the tumbling of an axisymmetric particle with the Burgers vortex velocity field, which superposes an axisymmetric extensional strain (u_r = −γr, u_x = 2γx) and a rotational component with Gaussian vorticity concentrated near the axis. Projecting Jeffery's equation onto the polar angle β yields an autonomous ODE that is independent of vorticity and radius, producing the exact exponential relaxation; projecting onto the azimuthal angle gives φ̇ = ω. This separation of strain-driven alignment and vorticity-driven precession is the load-bearing structural insight, and the appendix shows that breaking axisymmetry (elliptic vortex)

What would settle it

Measure the alignment relaxation rate for fibers of several aspect ratios in a microfluidic Burgers-like vortex whose strain rate γ is measured independently by PIV or by tracer trajectories; if tanβ does not decay exponentially with rate 3κγ, or if fibers with different initial β0 do not collapse onto the same exponential curve, the central claim is falsified. A second check: confirm that the fiber precession rate exactly equals the local fluid vorticity once the fiber is in the core; any systematic lag beyond finite-size corrections would contradict the decoupling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Proceeding from the Jeffery equation for a prolate particle and the analytical Burgers vortex velocity field, the authors show that the polar angle β obeys dβ/dt = −(3κγ/2) sin 2β, independent of vorticity and radial position, so tanβ(t) = tanβ0 exp(−3κγt). The azimuthal angle φ instead follows φ̇ = ω, the local fluid rotation rate. Strain alone drives alignment toward the vortex axis on a timescale (3κγ)^{-1}; vorticity alone drives precession around it; the two are fully decoupled. The same exponential decay of tanβ and the same fiber rotation rate (matching the fluid rotation) are observed in microfluidic experiments and in simulations, and the fitted alignment rates agree with independen

Load-bearing premise

The Jeffery description assumes the fiber experiences the undisturbed velocity gradient evaluated at its center of mass, with the flow locally uniform over the fiber length; if this local uniformity fails—for fibers whose length approaches the vortex core size—the exponential alignment law and precession rate would break down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any flow that locally resembles a Burgers vortex, rigid fibers will exponentially align with the vortex axis on a timescale (3κγ)^{-1}, independent of their initial orientation or how far they entered the core.
  • Because alignment and precession are decoupled, the full orientation state of a fiber is specified by two scalar quantities: the strain rate γ and the vorticity ω it samples along its trajectory.
  • The measured alignment rate provides a direct experimental estimate of the local strain rate in the vortex core, a quantity otherwise hard to obtain in microfluidic flows.
  • Finite fiber length and particle inertia only weakly perturb the orientational dynamics: longer fibers rotate slightly slower and align slightly faster than the local Jeffery prediction, but the robust orientational attractor is preserved.
  • The vortex axis acts as a stable orientational attractor, in contrast to the marginally stable closed Jeffery orbits of simple shear, making the orientation dynamics robust to weak perturbations from inertia, shape, and flow imperfections.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the alignment rate is independent of initial conditions and local vorticity, fibers could serve as microrheological probes of strain rate in vortical regions of turbulence or in industrial mixers, simply by imaging their relaxation toward the local axis.
  • The robust attractor suggests that in turbulent flows, fibers may spend significantly more time aligned with vortex tubes than in strain-dominated regions; a statistical model of fiber orientation could treat vortex tubes as absorbing orientational states rather than evolving through full Jeffery dynamics.
  • A natural testable extension: flexible fibers should retain the same precession rate but exhibit a modified alignment rate that depends on bending stiffness; the paper's discussion of flexibility points to this but does not derive it.
  • The decoupling could simplify subgrid models of fiber-laden turbulence: advect the fiber orientation with the local vorticity and apply a scalar relaxation toward the vorticity axis at rate 3κγ, bypassing the full orientation tensor evolution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the orientation dynamics of rigid neutrally buoyant fibers in a microfluidic cross-slot geometry that produces a stationary Burgers-like vortex. Combining Jeffery's equation for a slender body with the analytical Burgers vortex velocity field, the authors derive an exponential alignment law tan β(t) = tan β₀ e^{−3κγt} (Eq. 3.10) and a uniform azimuthal precession φ̇ = ω (Eq. 3.11), showing that alignment and precession are decoupled. They compare these predictions with bead-spring simulations (with Re_p ≪ 1) and microfluidic experiments spanning Re_p ≈ 0.05–12, claiming that the orientation dynamics are accurately captured by the Jeffery description despite finite size, finite inertia, and deviations from an ideal Burgers vortex. The paper also proposes an elliptic stretched-vortex model in Appendix A to explain residual oscillations in the alignment angle.

Significance. The central analytical prediction is simple, falsifiable, and parameter-free given the Burgers velocity field and the fiber aspect ratio: the alignment time scale is (3κγ)^{−1} and the precession rate equals the local fluid vorticity. This is a valuable benchmark for understanding fiber orientation in stretched vortices, which are building blocks of turbulent flows. The combination of an exact derivation, numerical simulation, and microfluidic experimentation is appropriate, and the independent estimation of γ from base-flow PIV and simulations partially anchors the comparison. However, the strength of the claims about robustness to inertia and finite-size effects currently exceeds what the experimental and numerical evidence supports.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2, §2.3, §4] The treatment of particle Reynolds number is internally inconsistent. §2.2 states Re_p ranges from 0.05 to 12; §2.3 assumes Re_p ≪ 1 in the simulations and acknowledges this 'may appear restrictive'; yet §4 states 'the particle Reynolds number remains small in the present experiments.' Since Eq. (3.10) is derived for a point particle in Stokes flow, its validity at Re_p ≈ 12 is not supported by the simulations, which exclude inertia. The authors should either restrict the main claim to Re_p ≪ 1 or provide a quantitative inertial correction or dedicated high-Re_p simulations.
  2. [§3.3, Fig. 3(c)] The experimental validation of Eq. (3.10) uses the projected angle θ rather than β, with tan θ = tan β cos φ. The exponential envelope of |tan θ| is modulated by the precession φ, so the fitted slope of the envelope is not a direct test of Eq. (3.10). Moreover, the fit yields γ ≈ 100 s^{-1} against independently measured PIV values of 115–150 s^{-1}, and no error bars or confidence intervals are given. This quantitative mismatch weakens the claim of 'excellent agreement.' Please provide the β reconstruction with uncertainties, or fit the full θ(t) model to the data.
  3. [§4, Fig. 4] The simulations themselves show systematic finite-size effects: Fig. 4(b,c) display L/r_γ-dependent alignment rates and rotation periods, and Fig. 4(a) shows trajectory deviations from the Burgers streamline r ~ x^{−1/2}. The paper attributes these to finite-size effects but then concludes that Jeffery equations 'provide an accurate description... over the range of particle Reynolds numbers and fiber lengths investigated.' For the longest fibers L/r_γ ≈ 3.3, the local velocity-gradient assumption is questionable. The conclusion should be tempered, and the quantitative range of validity of Eq. (3.10) should be stated explicitly.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.1] The reconstruction of β from the apparent fiber length is mentioned but not described; please provide a brief description or a reference, as the noise level is later used to justify switching to θ.
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (3.11)] In Eq. (3.4), ω is defined as half the core vorticity, but the text says 'the fluid vorticity tends towards ω'. Clarify the factor 1/2 to avoid confusion.
  3. [Appendix A] The asymmetry parameter ε is introduced in Eq. (A 3) but the sign convention is not explained. Please state how ε relates to the axisymmetric limit and to the cross-slot geometry.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Jeffery–Burgers derivation is self-contained and independently benchmarked.

full rationale

The central predictive chain is a direct derivation, not a re-labeling of inputs. Equations (3.1) and (3.2) (Jeffery’s equation and the Burgers velocity field) are combined through the angular parametrization (3.5) to obtain dβ/dt = −3κγ sinβ cosβ, whose integral is tanβ(t) = tanβ₀ e^{−3κγt}; the azimuthal result φ̇ = ω follows from the same projection. No fitted parameter is inserted into this derivation. The strain rate γ used in the comparison is obtained independently from base-flow vorticity profiles (Fig. 1d, μ-PIV and single-phase DNS), while the exponential decay slope is measured from orientation trajectories in §3.3; the agreement tests the functional form and the factor 3κ rather than assuming them. The self-citations (Aulnette et al. 2025 for the cross-slot flow field and experimental setup; Delmotte et al. 2015, Li et al. 2024 for the bead model) provide reproducible simulation infrastructure and are not used as an unverified uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification of the central claim. The paper’s own stated limitations—Re_p up to 12 while simulations assume Re_p ≪ 1, the local-velocity-gradient approximation for long fibers, and a ~15–30% discrepancy between fitted and PIV γ—weaken the strength of the validation but do not constitute circular reasoning: these are concerns about applicability and uncertainty, not about a prediction reducing to a fit by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theory itself adds no free parameters beyond the known Jeffery and Burgers ingredients; the fitting parameters ω₀ and r_γ (hence γ) characterize the base flow and are measured independently. The main assumptions are the local Jeffery description and the validity of the viscous bead-spring model at the experimental Re_p.

free parameters (2)
  • strain rate γ (via Burgers core radius r_γ) = ≈ 100–150 s⁻¹ (experiments/PIV ≈100 s⁻¹, simulations ≈120 s⁻¹, base-flow 115–150 s⁻¹)
    The Burgers vortex profile ω_x = ω₀ exp(−z²/r_γ²) is fitted to the measured/simulated vorticity in Fig. 1(d), giving r_γ = 1.5×10⁻⁴ m; γ = 2ν/r_γ² enters the predicted alignment rate 3κγ. It is also fitted directly from the exponential decay of |tanβ| in Fig. 3.
  • core vorticity magnitude ω₀ = 36 (dimensionless)
    Fitted in Fig. 1(d) to match the Gaussian vorticity profile; used to set the precession rate in the Burgers model.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Jeffery's equation (3.1) governs the orientation of an inertialess neutrally buoyant spheroid in a viscous flow
    Invoked in §3.2 as the starting point; assumes Stokes flow, no Brownian motion, no inertia. The paper later relaxes this for finite Re_p but keeps the framework.
  • domain assumption The base flow is a stationary axisymmetric Burgers vortex with velocity field (3.2)
    Used in §3.2 to derive the decay law; validated by fitting the measured vorticity profile in Fig. 1(d), though the vortex is not perfectly axisymmetric.
  • domain assumption Near-core approximation r ≪ r_γ (Eq. 3.4) so u_φ ≈ (Γγ/4πν) r and ω ≈ Γγ/4πν
    Used to obtain constant-coefficient equations (3.6)–(3.8); in the real flow the vorticity varies along the trajectory, so the comparison is made after the fiber enters the core.
  • domain assumption Bead-spring model with Rotne-Prager-Yamakawa mobility correctly captures the fiber-fluid hydrodynamic interactions and the flow around the fiber is viscous (Re_p ≪ 1)
    Invoked in §2.3 for the numerical method; the paper acknowledges this is violated for the longest fibers in experiments and justifies it a posteriori.
  • domain assumption The apparent projected angle θ can stand in for β in the experimental analysis because tanθ = tanβ cosφ and the envelope of |tanθ| decays like |tanβ|
    Used throughout §3.3 to compare experiments to the β-theory; introduces noise at small angles as acknowledged.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Orientation Dynamics of Rigid Fibers in a Microfluidic Burgers-like Vortex." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4TLJGK3D

@misc{pith2026260714298,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Orientation Dynamics of Rigid Fibers in a Microfluidic Burgers-like Vortex},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4TLJGK3D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14298}
}
read the original abstract

Fiber suspensions are common in biological and environmental flows and are widely used in industrial applications. Fiber transport and orientation dynamics are affected by interactions with the surrounding fluid and strongly depend on the nature of the flow. The complexity of realistic flows, which are often heterogeneous or time-dependent, hinders a full understanding of fiber dynamics. In this study, we combine microfluidic experiments, theory and numerical simulations to investigate the orientation dynamics of rigid neutrally buoyant fibers in a well-controlled model system, a streamwise stationary vortex at moderate Reynolds number. Despite the three-dimensional nature of the flow, the orientation dynamics are remarkably simple: the fiber orientation is accurately described by Jeffery equations coupled with the Burgers-vortex model. We show that fibers undergo uniform precession about the vortex axis driven by fluid vorticity while simultaneously aligning with the latter due to strain in the vortex core. These two motions are decoupled, with the alignment timescale determined by the local strain rate and the fiber aspect ratio. Finite particle size and inertia induce weak deviations from the base flow streamlines while leaving the orientational dynamics largely unaffected. These results establish a simple framework for understanding the behavior of elongated particles in stretched vortex flows, which constitute key building blocks of turbulence

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14298 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Particle flow in the vortical field formed in the cross-slot geometry; Particle inflows from two opposing directions interact with a 3D vortex that is stretched downstream in the opposing outlet directions. In inset, definition of the polar angle 𝛽 between the fiber and the vortex axis, the projection 𝜃 measured in the Stretched Vortex Plane (SVP) in our experiments, and the azimuthal angle 𝜙 in the orthogonal p… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Stacks of experimental and simulated fiber images in the cross-slot geometry. (a,c) Experimental visualization of the Core Vortex Plane (CVP), obtained with a microfluidic glass device at Re = 46 and Stretched Vortex Plane (SVP), imaged using a PDMS device at Re = 56. Overlayed are the experimental trajectories color-coded as a function of the angles 𝜙 and 𝜃 as defined in figure 1. (e,g) Temporal evolutions of 𝜙 and… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Orientation dynamics of elongated fibers (a,b) in a Burgers vortex derived from the Jeffery equations, (c,d) in the simulated 3D vortex, (e,f) in our experimental 3D vortex. Panels (a,c) show the time evolution of | tan(𝛽)| for the Burgers vortex and the simulations respectively. Panel (e) shows the time evolution of | tan(𝜃)| for the experiments. In panel (c), the magenta dashed line shows the slope averaged over a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Normalized experimental and simulated amplitude of trajectories envelope in the cross-slot vortex, 𝐴𝑛/𝐴0 as a function of position 𝑥𝑛 in log-log scale, compared with a decaying envelope of the Burgers vortex streamlines (red solid line). The normalization coefficie…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top: velocity field and vorticity contours (orange dashed lines) for (a) an axisymmetric stretched vortex (𝜖 = 0) and (b) an asymmetric stretched vortex (𝜖 = 0.5). Bottom: representative tracer trajectories. A.1. Stretched elliptic vortex flow The steady stretched elli…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time evolution of tan 𝛽 for three values of the asymmetry parameter, 𝜖 = 0, 0.5, and 0.75. Red lines denote numerical solutions of Jeffery equations, and black lines indicate the theoretical exponential decay predicted for an axisymmetric Burgers vortex. whose solution…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Langmuir 22 (2), 765--774

    Alargova, Rossitza G , Paunov, Vesselin N & Velev, Orlin D 2006 Formation of polymer microrods in shear flow by emulsification- solvent attrition mechanism . Langmuir 22 (2), 765--774

    2006

  2. [2]

    , Shen, Amy Q

    Aulnette, Marine , Burshtein, Noa , Banaei, Arash Alizad , Brandt, Luca , Haward, Simon J. , Shen, Amy Q. , Delmotte, Blaise & Lindner, Anke 2025 Transport of spherical microparticles in a three-dimensional vortex flow . Phys. Rev. Fluids 10 , 124201

    2025

  3. [3]

    , Chan, S.T

    Burshtein, N. , Chan, S.T. , Toda-Peters, K. , Shen, A.Q. & Haward, S.J. 2019 3 D -printed glass microfluidics for fluid dynamics and rheology . Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 43 , 1--14

    2019

  4. [4]

    , Zografos, K

    Burshtein, N. , Zografos, K. , Shen, A.Q. , Poole, R.J. & Haward, S.J. 2017 Inertioelastic flow instability at a stagnation point . Physical Review X 7 (4), 041039

    2017

  5. [5]

    , Zografos, K

    Burshtein, N. , Zografos, K. , Shen, A.Q. , Poole, R.J. & Haward, S.J. 2021 Periodic fluctuations of streamwise vortices in inertia-dominated intersecting flows . Physics of Fluids 33 (1)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 954 , A3

    Clark, Laura K , DiBenedetto, Michelle H , Ouellette, Nicholas T & Koseff, Jeffrey R 2023 Dispersion of finite-size, non-spherical particles by waves and currents . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 954 , A3

    2023

  7. [7]

    Journal of Computational Physics 286 , 14--37

    Delmotte, Blaise , Climent, Eric & Plourabou \'e , Franck 2015 A general formulation of bead models applied to flexible fibers and active filaments at low reynolds number . Journal of Computational Physics 286 , 14--37

    2015

  8. [8]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 979 , A42

    Di Giusto, Davide , Bergougnoux, Laurence , Marchioli, Cristian & Guazzelli, \'E lisabeth 2024 Influence of small inertia on J effery orbits . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 979 , A42

    2024

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 58

    DiBenedetto, Michelle H 2025 The fluid mechanics of ocean microplastics . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 58

    2025

  2. [10]

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 51 (1), 539--572

    Du Roure, Olivia , Lindner, Anke , Nazockdast, Ehssan N & Shelley, Michael J 2019 Dynamics of flexible fibers in viscous flows and fluids . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 51 (1), 539--572

    2019

  3. [11]

    Physical Review E 91 (4), 041002

    Einarsson, Jonas , Candelier, F , Lundell, Fredrik , Angilella, JR & Mehlig, B 2015 Effect of weak fluid inertia upon J effery orbits . Physical Review E 91 (4), 041002

    2015

  4. [12]

    Physics of Fluids 28 (1)

    Einarsson, J , Mihiretie, BM , Laas, A , Ankardal, S , Angilella, JR , Hanstorp, D & Mehlig, B 2016 Tumbling of asymmetric microrods in a microchannel flow . Physics of Fluids 28 (1)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Guazzelli, Elisabeth & Morris, Jeffrey F 2011 A physical introduction to suspension dynamics\/ , , vol. 45 . Cambridge University Press

    2011

  6. [14]

    Physical Review E 93 (3), 031101

    Haward, Simon J , Poole, Robert J , Alves, Manuel A , Oliveira, Paulo J , Goldenfeld, Nigel & Shen, Amy Q 2016 Tricritical spiral vortex instability in cross-slot flow . Physical Review E 93 (3), 031101

    2016

  7. [15]

    , Choi, S-E

    Hur, S.C. , Choi, S-E. , Kwon, S. & Carlo, D. Di 2011 Inertial focusing of non-spherical microparticles . Applied Physics Letters 99 (4), 044101

    2011

  8. [16]

    , Candelier, F

    Ibarra, E. , Candelier, F. & Verhille, G. 2026 Trapping of a flexible disk in a vortical flow: Reconstruction process, measurements, and theory . Physical Review Fluids 11 (4), 044302

    2026

  9. [17]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1032 , A7

    Islam, Rubaiyat Bin , Morshed, Adnan , Cortez, Ricardo & Fauci, Lisa 2026 Dancing fibres in a microscale burgers-like vortex . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1032 , A7

    2026

  10. [18]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Jeffery, George Barker 1922 The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing papers of a mathematical and physical character 102 (715), 161--179

    1922

  11. [19]

    , Trowbridge, John H

    Jumars, Peter A. , Trowbridge, John H. , Boss, Emmanuel & Karp-Boss, Lee 2009 Turbulence-plankton interactions: A new cartoon . Marine Ecology 30 , 133--150

    2009

  12. [20]

    Europhysics Letters 126 (4), 44003

    Junot, Gaspard , Figueroa-Morales, Nuris , Darnige, Thierry , Lindner, Anke , Soto, Rodrigo , Auradou, Harold & Cl \'e ment, Eric 2019 Swimming bacteria in poiseuille flow: The quest for active B retherton- J effery trajectories . Europhysics Letters 126 (4), 44003

    2019

  13. [21]

    Journal of fluid mechanics 819 , 540--561

    Lashgari, Iman , Ardekani, Mehdi Niazi , Banerjee, Indradumna , Russom, Aman & Brandt, Luca 2017 Inertial migration of spherical and oblate particles in straight ducts . Journal of fluid mechanics 819 , 540--561

    2017

  14. [22]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123 (6), e2520537123

    Li, Zhibo , Bielinski, Cl \'e ment , Lindner, Anke , Delmotte, Blaise & Du Roure, Olivia 2026 A microfluidic band-pass filter for flexible fiber separation . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123 (6), e2520537123

    2026

  15. [23]

    Physical Review Fluids 9 (4), 044302

    Li, Zhibo , Bielinski, Cl \'e ment , Lindner, Anke , Du Roure, Olivia & Delmotte, Blaise 2024 Dynamics of rigid fibers interacting with triangular obstacles in microchannel flows . Physical Review Fluids 9 (4), 044302

    2024

  16. [24]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (38), 9438--9443

    Liu, Yanan , Chakrabarti, Brato , Saintillan, David , Lindner, Anke & Du Roure, Olivia 2018 Morphological transitions of elastic filaments in shear flow . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (38), 9438--9443

    2018

  17. [25]

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 43 (1), 195--217

    Lundell, Fredrik , S \"o derberg, L Daniel & Alfredsson, P Henrik 2011 Fluid mechanics of papermaking . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 43 (1), 195--217

    2011

  18. [26]

    Physical Review Fluids 3 (10), 104102

    Marchetti, Benjamin , Raspa, Veronica , Lindner, Anke , Du Roure, Olivia , Bergougnoux, Laurence , Guazzelli, \'E lisabeth & Duprat, Camille 2018 Deformation of a flexible fiber settling in a quiescent viscous fluid . Physical Review Fluids 3 (10), 104102

    2018

  19. [27]

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 58

    Marchioli, Cristian , Rosti, Marco Edoardo & Verhille, Gautier 2025 Flexible fibers in turbulence . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 58

    2025

  20. [28]

    , Hermans, M

    Meineke, G. , Hermans, M. , Klos, J. , Lenenbach, A. & Noll, R. 2016 A microfluidic opto-caloric switch for sorting of particles by using 3d-hydrodynamic focusing based on sle fabrication capabilities . Lab on a Chip 16 (5), 820--828

    2016

  21. [29]

    & Voth, Greg A

    Ni, Rui , Kramel, Stefan , Ouellette, Nicholas T. & Voth, Greg A. 2015 Measurements of the coupling between the tumbling of rods and the velocity gradient tensor in turbulence . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 766 , 202--225

    2015

  22. [30]

    & Voth, Greg A

    Ni, Rui , Ouellette, Nicholas T. & Voth, Greg A. 2014 Alignment of vorticity and rods with lagrangian fluid stretching in turbulence . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 743

    2014

  23. [31]

    Physical Review Fluids 6 (4), 044610

    Oehmke, Theresa B , Bordoloi, Ankur D , Variano, Evan & Verhille, Gautier 2021 Spinning and tumbling of long fibers in isotropic turbulence . Physical Review Fluids 6 (4), 044610

    2021

  24. [32]

    Physical review letters 109 (13), 134501

    Parsa, Shima , Calzavarini, Enrico , Toschi, Federico & Voth, Greg A 2012 Rotation rate of rods in turbulent fluid flow . Physical review letters 109 (13), 134501

    2012

  25. [33]

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 24 (1), 313--358

    Pedley, TJ & Kessler, John O 1992 Hydrodynamic phenomena in suspensions of swimming microorganisms . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 24 (1), 313--358

    1992

  26. [34]

    New journal of physics 13 (9), 093030

    Pumir, Alain & Wilkinson, Michael 2011 Orientation statistics of small particles in turbulence . New journal of physics 13 (9), 093030

    2011

  27. [35]

    Studies in applied mathematics 70 (2), 163--181

    Robinson, AC & Saffman, PG 1984 Stability and structure of stretched vortices . Studies in applied mathematics 70 (2), 163--181

    1984

  28. [36]

    Nature communications 12 (1), 106

    Ross, Peter S , Chastain, Stephen , Vassilenko, Ekaterina , Etemadifar, Anahita , Zimmermann, Sarah , Quesnel, Sarah-Ann , Eert, Jane , Solomon, Eric , Patankar, Shreyas , Posacka, Anna M & others 2021 Pervasive distribution of polyester fibres in the arctic ocean is driven by...

    2021

  29. [37]

    Journal of Computational Physics 424 , 109846

    Schoeller, Simon F , Townsend, Adam K , Westwood, Timothy A & Keaveny, Eric E 2021 Methods for suspensions of passive and active filaments . Journal of Computational Physics 424 , 109846

    2021

  30. [38]

    New Journal of Physics 24 (1), 013013

    S owicka, Agnieszka M , Xue, Nan , Sznajder, Pawe , Nunes, Janine K , Stone, Howard A & Ekiel-Je \.z ewska, Maria L 2022 Buckling of elastic fibers in a shear flow . New Journal of Physics 24 (1), 013013

    2022

  31. [39]

    Soft Matter 18 (47), 8931--8944

    Tanasijevi \'c , Ivan & Lauga, Eric 2022 Microswimmers in vortices: dynamics and trapping . Soft Matter 18 (47), 8931--8944

    2022

  32. [40]

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Testa, Giovanni , Suaria, Giuseppe , Paluselli, Andrea , La Ragione, Salom \'e , Gambale, Michela , Berta, Maristella , Rivera, Lorena A , Mahadevan, Amala , Middleton, Leo , Falcieri, Francesco M & others 2026 Microfibers accumulation within a mediterranean submesoscale cyclo...

    2026

  33. [41]

    Advanced Materials p

    Thouvenot, Elliot , Charnay, Laura , Burshtein, Noa , Guigner, Jean-Michel , Dec, L \'e onie , Loew, Damarys , Silva, Amanda KA , Lindner, Anke & Wilhelm, Claire 2024 High-yield bioproduction of extracellular vesicles from stem cell spheroids via millifluidic vortex transport ...

    2024

  34. [42]

    Micromachines 12 (3), 277

    Tohme, Tohme , Magaud, Pascale & Baldas, Lucien 2021 Transport of non-spherical particles in square microchannel flows: A review . Micromachines 12 (3), 277

    2021

  35. [43]

    Voth, Greg A & Soldati, Alfredo 2017 Anisotropic particles in turbulence . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech 49 (1), 249--276

    2017

  36. [44]

    , Zuk, Pawel J

    Wajnryb, Eligiusz , Mizerski, Krzysztof A. , Zuk, Pawel J. & Szymczak, Piotr 2013 Generalization of the R otne– P rager– Y amakawa mobility and shear disturbance tensors . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 731 , R3

    2013

  37. [45]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 (38), e2405459121

    Wang, Ziqi , de Wit, Xander M & Toschi, Federico 2024 Localization--delocalization transition for light particles in turbulence . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 (38), e2405459121

    2024

  38. [46]

    Integrative and comparative biology 55 (4), 706--718

    Webster, DR , Young, DL & Yen, J 2015 Copepods' response to B urgers' vortex: deconstructing interactions of copepods with turbulence . Integrative and comparative biology 55 (4), 706--718

    2015

  39. [47]

    Soft Matter 15 (29), 5810--5814

    Z \"o ttl, Andreas , Klop, Kira E , Balin, Andrew K , Gao, Yongxiang , Yeomans, Julia M & Aarts, Dirk GAL 2019 Dynamics of individual B rownian rods in a microchannel flow . Soft Matter 15 (29), 5810--5814

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.