Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 70 references

Computational studies of giant edge islands and unpaired X-points in HSX and W7-X by manipulating coil currents

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read By reducing current in a single coil near the straight section, both HSX and W7-X can be pushed into a regime where edge islands grow far beyond previously reported sizes, sometimes so large that the island O-points leave the field line map

desk verdict Genuinely new computational finding, but the central island-size metric needs a convergence check before the 'new class' claim is taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.14722 v1 pith:YRX45ILO submitted 2026-07-16 physics.plasm-ph

Robert Davies , Dieter Boeyaert , Alexis Wolfmeister , Benedikt Geiger , Georg Harrer , Joachim Geiger This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.55.Hc
keywords giantislandsislanddivertorunpairedX-pointsstellaratorHSXW7-Xcoilcurrentvariationedgemagnetictopology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a single, simple control knob—the current in the coil nearest the symmetry plane of the straight section (main coil 6 in HSX, non-planar coil 5 in W7-X)—can drive the edge magnetic structure into a new regime of 'giant' islands, far larger than any configuration previously reported for these machines. In the most extreme cases, the island O-points leave the field line map entirely and the divertor legs of the remaining X-points do not close around the island, a topology that departs from the ordinary island divertor. The authors quantify island size with two metrics, d_min and d_max, and show that the largest examples exceed those of all released W7-X configurations. Using the EMC3-Lite heat diffusion model, they identify W7-X configurations in which most of the power lands on the divertor plates, suggesting these regimes could be promising for plasma-facing component heat loads. The paper establishes that such regimes are obtainable and can in principle be studied experimentally, though coil-force and stability analyses are left for future work.

What carries the argument

The central object is the magnetic island chain at a low-order rational surface, whose size is quantified by two metrics: d_min, the minimum distance from the island's inner separatrix to its O-point, and d_max, the maximum distance; these bound the radial extent of the divertor legs. The controlling mechanism is the reduction of current in a single coil located at the symmetry plane of the straight section, which pushes the O-point outward and enlarges the island, eventually removing it from the field line map. X- and O-points are located by root-finding on the field line map and classified by the trace of its Jacobian, and the separatrix is traced from the X-point eigenvectors. The EMC3-Li

What would settle it

A concrete falsifier would be a coil-force structural analysis showing that the reduced currents required for giant islands (e.g., I_main6 = 0 or I_NPC5 = 0.1) produce forces exceeding the engineering limits of the coils or supports. Alternatively, an experiment on HSX with I_main6 = 0 that fails to show the predicted increase in d_min and d_max would directly contradict the vacuum-field prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that reducing the current in a single symmetry-plane coil—I_main6 in HSX and I_NPC5 in W7-X—is a sufficient (though not necessary) condition for producing giant island chains, with rotational transform 4/3 or 4/4 for HSX and 5/6, 5/5, or 5/4 for W7-X. As the current is lowered, the island O-points move outward and the islands grow monotonically, as measured by d_min and d_max. In the most extreme cases, the O-points leave the domain of the field line map, leaving 'unpaired' X-points whose divertor legs do not encircle an island. These configurations represent a new class of edge magnetic topologies for existing machines, and they demonstrate that the operational spac

Load-bearing premise

The experimental promise rests on the assumption that the non-standard coil currents—such as I_main6 = 0 in HSX or I_NPC5 = 0.1 in W7-X—are operationally achievable; the authors note that coil forces analysis is not explored and safe operation is a topic of ongoing research.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single coil current becomes a practical control knob for tuning edge magnetic topology in two existing stellarators, without any change to coil geometry.
  • The giant-island configurations produce long, approximately straight divertor legs, which may aid in the design of tight baffling and geometric closure of the divertor.
  • The unpaired X-point topology represents a regime beyond the ordinary island divertor, expanding the menu of edge configurations available for studying divertor physics.
  • The d_min and d_max values of the proposed W7-X configurations exceed all released W7-X configurations, indicating unexplored operational space in currently approved machines.
  • For the selected W7-X configurations, EMC3-Lite simulations show that 77–94% of the exhaust power lands on the divertor plates, suggesting these regimes could be compatible with PFC heat-load requirements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to reproduce the single-coil reduction in other low-shear modular-coil stellarators; if the same growth of d_min and d_max appears, the mechanism is generic rather than device-specific.
  • The island-size metrics d_min and d_max capture only radial extent; a fuller topological characterization—for example, connection-length distributions or turnstile flux—might reveal additional structure in the unpaired X-point regime.
  • The vacuum-field calculations here ignore finite-beta and plasma-response effects; a natural next step is to recompute these configurations with equilibrium codes to see whether the giant islands survive plasma pressure.
  • The authors' speculation that a toroidally extended low-current gap produces giant islands could be turned into a design rule for future coil optimization, where the current distribution is deliberately shaped to leave such a gap.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper reports computational magnetic configurations in HSX and W7-X with 'giant' edge islands, obtained by reducing the current in one coil (main coil 6 in HSX, non-planar coil 5 in W7-X) near the straight-section symmetry plane. The authors characterize the island size with d_min and d_max metrics, show Poincaré plots and connection lengths, and use the EMC3-Lite heat-diffusion model to estimate PFC heat loads for selected HSX and W7-X configurations. The central claim is modest: such configurations exist computationally, that they are spatially larger than previously reported configurations, and that in the most extreme cases the island O-points leave the domain of the field-line map, leaving 'unpaired' X-points. The paper explicitly acknowledges that coil-force analysis and full divertor-performance evaluation are outside its scope.

Significance. If the quantitative claims are robust, the paper establishes a new, larger class of edge topologies in two existing modular-coil stellarators, which is relevant for island-divertor physics and for assessing the flexibility of existing machines. The main strengths are the transparent methodology (explicit coil-current tables, use of an established X/O-point root-finding scheme, vacuum-field analysis), the absence of circular fitting, and the clearly stated limitations. However, the central quantitative novelty — that the new islands exceed all released W7-X configurations in d_min/d_max — rests on a finite-time separatrix trace whose convergence is not demonstrated. Also, the existence of 'unpaired X-points' is asserted but not documented by explicit root-finding results. These points need to be addressed before the paper can be accepted as a rigorous quantitative study.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.1, §4.3, Fig. 10] The d_min/d_max calculation traces X-point manifolds 'for a finite number of field periods, selected so that the inner separatrix is well-sampled but before the chaotic lobes become warped' (§2.1). No convergence study or sensitivity to the trace length is reported. Since d_min is the minimum over the sampled manifold, a longer trace could lower d_min, and d_max could increase; the effect may differ between the proposed giant-island configurations and the released ones. The claim that YFK has d_max ≈ 50 cm versus <30 cm for all released configurations (approximately double, §4.3) is load-bearing for the 'spatially larger' and 'far beyond existing configuration space' conclusions. Please provide a trace-length convergence study, report the chosen stopping points, and give error bars or a sensitivity range for the values in Fig. 10.
  2. [Abstract, §2, §3, §4] The abstract and title emphasize 'unpaired X-points', and the text states that in the most extreme cases 'the island O-points leave the domain of the field line map' and the divertor legs of the remaining X-points 'do not close around the island'. However, the paper does not show explicit X/O-point existence data (e.g., a table or plot of the root-finding results as the coil current is scanned, or the number of X/O-points found in the extreme configurations). The Poincaré plots are suggestive, but they do not quantitatively demonstrate the disappearance of the O-point while an X-point persists. Please add a direct characterization of the X/O-point set for the extreme cases, or revise the wording to match the evidence actually presented.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Figure 6 caption] Typo: 'confugration' should be 'configuration'.
  2. [Figure 7 caption] Typo: 'escpaing' should be 'escaping'.
  3. [Section 3] The sentence 'The and connection length and Poincaré data is shown...' has a missing word or extra 'and'.
  4. [Section 1 and passim] Typo: 'axillary' should be 'auxiliary' (e.g., 'the axillary coil currents').
  5. [Table 2] Inconsistency: §2 states that I_PC_A = I_PC_B = 0.25 selects ι=5/6 and -0.23 selects ι=5/4, but Table 2 labels DMM with [0.25,0.25] as 'low iota' with edge ι=5/5, and FTM with [-0.23,-0.23] as 'high iota' with edge ι=5/5. Please correct the edge-iota values or the coil-current assignments.
  6. [Figure 8, §4.2] The text says the analysis is for four configurations SVM, NUL, WNJ, YFK, but Figure 8 caption labels panels g-i as TDK, while the text refers to those panels as WNJ. Also, TDK appears in Table 2 but is not mentioned as one of the four selected configurations. Please clarify which configuration is shown and reconcile the numbering.
  7. [§4.2, Figs. 7,9] The EMC3-Lite heat-load results are for a single set of transport parameters for each device (e.g., HSX: Te=Ti=50 eV, ne=1e18 m^-3, χ=1 m^2/s; W7-X: T=100 eV, ne=1e19 m^-3, χ=3 m^2/s). No sensitivity scan is shown. Since the abstract describes configurations as 'promising for PFC heat loads', please at least add a caveat about how sensitive the heat-load fractions and peak values are to these assumptions, or perform a small parameter variation.
  8. [§5] Typo: 'these studies provide a examples' should be 'provide examples'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: island sizes and heat loads are computed outputs, not fitted inputs; self-citations are methodological, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation is a forward computation from specified coil currents to vacuum-field magnetic topology and EMC3-Lite heat loads. The island-size metrics d_min and d_max are defined in §2.1 from X/O-point root finding and finite-time separatrix tracing; the reduced-coil configurations are not fitted to these metrics, and the released-configuration comparison in Fig. 10 uses the same metric on independent coil sets. The only self-citations (Davies et al. 2026 for the X/O root-finding scheme, Smiet et al. 2025 for turnstile-area diagnostics) are numerical methods, not unverified premises on which the central claim rests. The paper's explicit caveats — 'Coil forces analysis ... would also be required but are not explored here' (Abstract, §4.2/§5) and 'It is not known whether giant islands are intrinsically favourable for divertor performance' (Abstract) — are limitations, not circular steps. The finite-separatrix trace-length choice in §2.1 ('tracing these field lines for a finite number of field periods, selected so that the inner separatrix is well-sampled but before the chaotic lobes become warped') is a possible convergence limitation for the quantitative d_min/d_max ordering, but it is a correctness/robustness concern, not an input-output identity; the topological existence of large islands is shown independently by Poincaré plots, connection lengths, and heat-load maps. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on manually chosen coil currents and the assumption that vacuum fields suffice. The heat-load predictions additionally depend on assumed EMC3-Lite transport parameters and a simplified 1D/2D diffusion model. No hidden fitted constants are used to define the island-size metrics, and no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Coil-current scan levels for I_main6 and I_NPC5 = HSX: I_main6 = 1, 0.7, 0.4, 0.1, 0; W7-X: I_NPC5 = 1, 0.7, 0.4, 0.1
    Chosen manually as the empirical control knob for island size; not derived from theory or fitted to external data.
  • Auxiliary/planar coil currents for edge iota selection and shift = e.g. I_aux = ±0.1 or -0.2 for HSX; I_PC_A/B = -0.23..0.29 for W7-X; I_NPC1-4 varied in selected configs
    Manually selected to set the target resonant surface and inward/outward plasma shift; these values directly determine which islands appear.
  • EMC3-Lite plasma transport inputs = HSX: T_e=T_i=50 eV, n_e=1e18 m^-3, chi=1 m^2/s, P_SOL=20 kW; W7-X: T=100 eV, n_e=1e19 m^-3, chi=3 m^2/s, P_SOL=5 MW
    Assumed input parameters for heat-load simulations; not measured or fitted, but they control the reported strike patterns and the 82%/84%/94%/77% divertor fractions.
  • d_min/d_max separatrix tracing horizon = finite number of field periods, 'selected so that the inner separatrix is well-sampled'
    A numerical choice that affects the island-size metric; the paper does not quantify sensitivity to this horizon.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Vacuum magnetic field approximation: the field is computed from coil currents alone, with plasma currents, diamagnetic effects, and error-field corrections neglected.
    Used throughout all Poincaré maps, island-size scans, and EMC3-Lite input; plasma response can shift or destroy these vacuum islands.
  • domain assumption Stellarator symmetry and periodicity: W7-X error fields that break periodicity are ignored, and coils are modeled as ideal periodic stellarator-symmetric sets.
    Invoked in Section 1: 'In practice, small error fields in W7-X break the periodicity/symmetry ... but in this modelling work this effect is ignored.'
  • domain assumption EMC3-Lite anisotropic heat diffusion with uniform Spitzer conductivity and prescribed diffusivities is an adequate proxy for edge heat deposition.
    Heat-load conclusions in Sections 3 and 4 rest on this model; it does not include neutral dynamics, drift effects, or radiation details.
  • standard math Standard Hamiltonian field-line map theory: X/O-points are characterized by the trace of the Jacobian of the field-line map, and separatrix manifolds are traced from X-point eigenvectors.
    Background mathematical framework for all island-size calculations; invoked in Section 2.1.
  • standard math Biot-Savart superposition of coil filament fields represents the actual magnetostatic configuration.
    Standard physics assumed by the field-line solvers; not independently verified against measured fields in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Computational studies of giant edge islands and unpaired X-points in HSX and W7-X by manipulating coil currents." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YRX45ILO

@misc{pith2026260714722,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Computational studies of giant edge islands and unpaired X-points in HSX and W7-X by manipulating coil currents},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YRX45ILO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14722}
}
abstract

We present magnetic configurations in the Helically Symmetric eXperiment (HSX) and Wendelstein 7-X (W7-X), in which the edge magnetic structure is dominated by island chains which are spatially larger than the previously reported configurations. These ``giant" island chains (with rotational transform $\iota=4/3$ or $4/4$ for HSX and $\iota=5/6$, $5/5$ or $5/4$ for W7-X) are obtained by reducing the coil current in main coil 6 for HSX and non-planar coil 5 for W7-X (i.e. the coil nearest the up-down symmetric cross-section $\phi=36^\circ$ for W7-X and $\phi=45^\circ$ for HSX); this appears a sufficient (but not necessary) condition for giant islands. The giant islands create relatively straight X-point legs which transport plasma to the plasma-facing components (PFCs). In the most extreme cases, the island O-points leave the domain of the field line map and the divertor legs of the remaining ``unpaired" X-points do not close around the island. We use the anisotropic heat diffusion code EMC3-Lite to find ``giant island" W7-X configurations which are promising for PFC heat loads. Coil forces analysis (in addition to other effects such as neoclassical transport and magnetohydrodynamic stability) would also be required but are not explored here. It is not known whether giant islands are intrinsically favourable for divertor performance but we demonstrate that such regimes, which are far from the ordinary island divertor, are obtainable and can in principle be studied experimentally. This also reveals the flexibility of existing machines for edge studies beyond their original design space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14722 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a-c) Poincare plots and ι = 5/5 X/O-points at different toroidal locations for W7-X standard (“EIM”) configuration. d-f) Poincare plots and ι = 8/7 X/O-points at different toroidal locations for HSX standard (“QHS”) configuration. Plasma-facing components are shown in red (the vessel wall for HSX, and the wall, divertor plates, baffles and heat shields for W7-X). magnetic island chain. This is the case in many tokam… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a) Top-down view of HSX plasma and coil system b) Top-down W7-X view. Coils shown for one field period. c) and d) Side-on views of a field period for HSX and W7-X. Unique coil geometries for each are colour-coded and labelled “main 1-6” and “aux. 1-6” for HSX and “NPC 1-5”, ”PCA,B” and ”CC” for W7-X (non-planar coils, planar coils and control coils respectively). Island size variation has been studied in W7-X (Barbu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Island size variation for HSX and W7-X across five families of magnetic configuration. Rows 1: HSX, with Imain 1-5 = 1 and Imain 6 = (1, 0.7, 0.4, 0.1) (a) - d)) (normalised currents), with edge ι = 4/4 selected by setting Iaux. 1-6 = 0.1. Row 2: the same but with edge ι = 4/3 via Iaux. 1-6 = −0.1. Rows 3-5: W7-X, with INPC 1-4 = 1 and INPC 5 = (1, 0.7, 0.4, 0.1), for edge ι = 5/4 (row 3, IPC A = IPC B = −0.23), 5/5… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of minimum and maximum distance (dmin, dmax) calculation for the W7-X standard configuration. The island O-point (blue) is shown at the locations of its closest and furthest approach from the inner island separatrix (black) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_f…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Island size as coil current scanned in HSX and W7-X. a) dmin and d) dmax for HSX for ι = 4/4 and 4/3 as Imain 6 is scanned. b) dmin and e) dmax for W7-X (ι = 5/4, 5/5, 5/6) as INPC 5 is scanned. c) dmin and f) dmax for W7-X (ι = 5/5) as ICC is scanned. For HSX ι = 4/3 …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Wall-to-wall connection length LC for QHS and selected HSX configurations at ϕ = 0◦ and ϕ = 45◦ , with Poincar´e data shown in black. Top row: QHS confugration. Middle: selected HSX configurations, ϕ = 0◦ . Lower: selected HSX configurations, ϕ = 45◦ . 3. Novel HSX con…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Simulated heat loads Q on the HSX vessel wall for reference (QHS, large island) and selected configurations for assumed non-radiated escpaing power PSOL = 20kW, as a function of toroidal angle (over one half field period i.e. ϕ = ◦ to ϕ = 45◦ ) and poloidal angle θ, de…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: PFC-to-PFC connection length LC for candidate W7-X configurations at different toroidal locations. The locations on PFCs where the simulated heat loads exceed a minimum cutoff value of 1MW/m2 for non-radiated power PSOL = 5MW are shown in red. a-c) NUL configuration; d…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Heat loads on divertor plates for selected W7-X configurations as a function of toroidal angle ϕ (restricted to the region of interest) and geometric poloidal angle θ for assumed non-radiated power PSOL = 5MW. Red outline indicates where the heat load exceeds 1MW/m2 . …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Island size for W7-X released and proposed configurations. All configurations are vacuum fields and have zero control coil current unless otherwise specified. letter, with an alphabetically earlier letter indicating lower mirror ratio), on-axis ι (the second letter, w…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Poincar´e for the 4 selected configurations at ϕ = 36◦ . e-h) Zoom-in of manifolds near the X-points to show turnstile lobe structures on the inner separatrix. section 2.1, assuming ICC = 0. We include the calculation for internal island chains and island divertor isl…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Magnetic structure in HSX, as each main coil is set to zero in turn. Iaux. 1-6 = 0.1 to ensure edge ι = 4/4. The lowest row corresponds to configuration HSX-3 in section 3. Shohji, M., Marquardt, M. & Haak, V. 2026 Ultra-high neutral pressures in the helical divertor …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Magnetic structure in W7-X, as each non-planar coil is set to zero in turn. IPC A = IPC B = ICC = 0 in all cases [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Illustration of inward/outward shift in W7-X via planar coils A and B. Left: illustration of how tilted planar coils with differing currents can create a net vertical field. Right: illustration of how a vertical field can create an inward/outward shift in R [PITH_FUL…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume=

    Two-Dimensional Measure-Preserving Mappings , author=. Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume=. 1968 , publisher=

    1968

  2. [2]

    Plasma Science and Technology , volume=

    Invariant manifold growth formula in cylindrical coordinates and its application for magnetically confined fusion , author=. Plasma Science and Technology , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  3. [3]

    Global realisation of magnetic fields as

    Duignan, Nathan and Perrella, David and Pfefferl. Global realisation of magnetic fields as. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.05692 , year=

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    The Physics of fluids , volume=

    Stochasticity reduction , author=. The Physics of fluids , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  5. [5]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Simulation of non-resonant stellarator divertor , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  6. [6]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Magnetic turnstiles in nonresonant stellarator divertor , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  7. [7]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=

    Direct stellarator coil design using global optimization: application to a comprehensive exploration of quasi-axisymmetric devices , author=. Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  8. [8]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04826 , year=

    A comprehensive exploration of quasisymmetric stellarators and their coil sets , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04826 , year=

    arXiv

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    HSX as an example of a resilient non-resonant divertor , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  2. [10]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    Exploration of non-resonant divertor features on the Compact Toroidal Hybrid , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  3. [11]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=

    Stellarator design , author=. Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  4. [12]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Simulation of stellarator divertors , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  5. [13]

    Plasma physics and controlled fusion , volume=

    Comparison between stellarator and tokamak divertor transport , author=. Plasma physics and controlled fusion , volume=

  6. [14]

    Fusion science and technology , volume=

    Physical aspects and design of the Wendelstein 7-X divertor , author=. Fusion science and technology , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  7. [15]

    Fusion science and technology , volume=

    Overview and future plan of helical divertor study in the Large Helical Device , author=. Fusion science and technology , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  8. [16]

    Journal of nuclear materials , volume=

    Helical divertor in the large helical device , author=. Journal of nuclear materials , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  9. [17]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    A tutorial on some basic aspects of divertor physics , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  10. [18]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , volume=

    Theory of plasma confinement in non-axisymmetric magnetic fields , author=. Reports on Progress in Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  11. [19]

    Garcia, K. A. and Bader, A. and Boeyaert, D. and Boozer, A. H. and Frerichs, H. and Gerard, M. J. and Punjabi, A. and Schmitz, O. , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  12. [20]

    51st EPS Conference on Plasma Physics , year=

    Modeling transport in stellarator island divertors in the presence of magnetic chaos , author=. 51st EPS Conference on Plasma Physics , year=

  13. [21]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=

    Experimental signatures of homoclinic tangles in poloidally diverted tokamaks , author=. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=

  14. [22]

    67th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics , year=

    Analysis of non-resonant divertors experiments with EMC3-EIRENE in W7-X and HSX , author=. 67th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics , year=

  15. [23]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    Simulations of edge configurations in quasi-helically symmetric geometry using EMC3--EIRENE , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  16. [24]

    Journal of Nuclear Materials , volume=

    MAST-upgrade divertor facility and assessing performance of long-legged divertors , author=. Journal of Nuclear Materials , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  17. [25]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    Performance assessment of a tightly baffled, long-legged divertor configuration in TCV with SOLPS-ITER , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  18. [26]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    Impact of the plasma geometry on divertor power exhaust: experimental evidence from TCV and simulations with SolEdge2D and TOKAM3X , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  19. [27]

    Journal of nuclear materials , volume=

    Observation of the heteroclinic tangles in the heat flux pattern of the ergodic divertor at TEXTOR , author=. Journal of nuclear materials , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  20. [28]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    Review of magnetic islands from the divertor perspective and a simplified heat transport model for the island divertor , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  21. [29]

    Reviews of Plasma Physics: Volume 5 , pages=

    Plasma confinement in closed magnetic systems , author=. Reviews of Plasma Physics: Volume 5 , pages=

  22. [30]

    2014 , publisher=

    ideal MHD , author=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  23. [31]

    Nuclear Fusion , author =

    The topology of non-resonant stellarator divertors , volume =. Nuclear Fusion , author =. 2025 , note =

    2025

  24. [32]

    Astrophysics and space science , volume=

    Energy Exhaust from Tokamaks: Problems and Solutions , author=. Astrophysics and space science , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  25. [33]

    Fusion Engineering and Design , volume=

    Stellaris: A high-field quasi-isodynamic stellarator for a prototypical fusion power plant , author=. Fusion Engineering and Design , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  26. [34]

    Physical Review , volume=

    The electrical conductivity of an ionized gas , author=. Physical Review , volume=. 1950 , publisher=

    1950

  27. [35]

    Fusion Engineering and Design , volume=

    Thermo-mechanical analysis of Wendelstein 7-X plasma facing components , author=. Fusion Engineering and Design , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  28. [36]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    CIEMAT-QI4X: a reactor-relevant quasi-isodynamic stellarator configuration compatible with an island divertor , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  29. [38]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.18265 , year=

    STAR\_Lite: A stellarator designed to experimentally validate non-resonant divertors , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.18265 , year=

  30. [39]

    IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity , volume=

    The Wendelstein 7-X trim coil system , author=. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  31. [40]

    IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity , volume=

    The trim coils for the Wendelstein 7-X magnet system , author=. IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  32. [41]

    Physical Review , volume=

    Transport phenomena in a completely ionized gas , author=. Physical Review , volume=. 1953 , publisher=

    1953

  33. [42]

    Qualitative Description of the Arc Plasma in a Magnetic Field , year=

    The characteristics of electrical discharges in magnetic fields , author=. Qualitative Description of the Arc Plasma in a Magnetic Field , year=

  34. [43]

    Riemann, K-U , journal=. The

  35. [44]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    Error field measurement, correction and heat flux balancing on Wendelstein 7-X , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  36. [45]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    Measurements and correction of the 1/1 error field in Wendelstein 7-X , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  37. [46]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    Measurements of plasma parameters in the divertor island of Wendelstein 7-X through line-ratio spectroscopy on helium , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  38. [47]

    2026 , school=

    Investigation of the Impact of Magnetic Island Geometric Parameters on Divertor Performance in Stellarators , author=. 2026 , school=

    2026

  39. [48]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    First experimental confirmation of island SOL geometry effects in a high radiation regime on W7-X , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  40. [49]

    Nuclear Materials and Energy , volume=

    Towards improved neutral exhaust in the HSX stellarator , author=. Nuclear Materials and Energy , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  41. [50]

    2004 , publisher=

    Measurements and modeling of the plasma response to electrode biasing in the HSX stellarator , author=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  42. [51]

    Nuclear Materials and Energy , volume=

    Investigating the role of divertor geometry on density build-up in the island divertor , author=. Nuclear Materials and Energy , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  43. [52]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    Establishment of a low recycling state with full density control by active pumping of the closed helical divertor at LHD , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  44. [53]

    Journal of Fusion Energy , volume=

    Ultra-High Neutral Pressures in the Helical Divertor of the Large Helical Device , author=. Journal of Fusion Energy , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  45. [54]

    Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , volume=

    Stellarator symmetry , author=. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  46. [55]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    Conditions and benefits of X-point radiation for the island divertor , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  47. [56]

    Fusion science and technology , volume=

    Overview of recent results from HSX , author=. Fusion science and technology , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  48. [57]

    Contributions to Plasma Physics , volume=

    Recent improvements in the EMC3-eirene code , author=. Contributions to Plasma Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  49. [58]

    Physics of Fluids , volume=

    The divertor, a device for reducing the impurity level in a stellarator , author=. Physics of Fluids , volume=

  50. [59]

    Plasma physics and controlled fusion , volume=

    The divertor program in stellarators , author=. Plasma physics and controlled fusion , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  51. [60]

    Journal of Fusion Energy , volume=

    Stellarator research opportunities: a report of the National Stellarator Coordinating Committee , author=. Journal of Fusion Energy , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  52. [61]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=

    Power and particle exhaust for the Infinity Two fusion pilot plant , author=. Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  53. [62]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15792 , year=

    Turnstile area as a measure for chaotic transport in magnetic confinement fusion devices , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15792 , year=

    arXiv

  54. [63]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.08027 , author =

    Overview of the. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.08027 , author =

  55. [64]

    51st EPS Conference on Plasma Physics , year=

    Stellarator divertor optimisation for a Stable Quasi-Isodynamic Design (SQuID): magnetic topology, divertor plates and baffle design , author=. 51st EPS Conference on Plasma Physics , year=

  56. [65]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , author=

    A quasi-isodynamic stellarator configuration towards a fusion power plant , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , author=. 2025 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0022377825100974 , number=

    2025 doi

  57. [66]

    Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , volume=

    Transport in Hamiltonian systems , author=. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , volume=. 1984 , publisher=

    1984

  58. [67]

    Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , volume=

    Extended chaos and disappearance of KAM trajectories , author=. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , volume=. 1984 , publisher=

    1984

  59. [68]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , author=

    Characterisation of X- and O-points in Wendelstein 7-X with respect to coil currents , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , author=. 2026 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0022377826101287 , number=

    2026 doi

  60. [69]

    and others , journal =

    Warmer, F. and others , journal =. European conceptual design of a. 2022 , publisher =

    2022

  61. [70]

    Effects of toroidal plasma current on divertor power depositions on

    Gao, Yu and Geiger, Joachim and Jakubowski, Marcin W and Drewelow, Peter and Endler, Michael and Rahbarnia, Kian and Bozhenkov, Sergey and Otte, Matthias and Suzuki, Yasuhiro and Feng, Yuhe and others , journal=. Effects of toroidal plasma current on divertor power depositions...

    2019

  62. [71]

    Power Exhaust Investigations in the

    Kharwandikar, Amit , year=. Power Exhaust Investigations in the

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.