Isothermal compression of a Fermi gas to deep quantum degeneracy

Alexandre de Martino; Christian Gro{\ss}; Eduard Heidt; Florian Kiesel; Jonas Auch; Kirill Karpov

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Isothermal compression of a Fermi gas to deep quantum degeneracy

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Isothermal compression in a bosonic bath cools a Fermi gas to T/T_F=0.024, bypassing adiabatic preparation.

desk verdict Clever new cooling protocol with a clean rate-equation story, but the headline degeneracy rests on bosonic thermometry plus an extrapolated tau_th, and the flat-tau_th data dip below the stated Li thermometer floor. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15616 v1 pith:PFRSOIF2 submitted 2026-07-17 cond-mat.quant-gas

Kirill Karpov , Jonas Auch , Eduard Heidt , Florian Kiesel , Alexandre De Martino , Christian Gro{ss} This is my paper

classification cond-mat.quant-gas

keywords isothermalcompressionFermidegeneracyPauliblockingthermalizationBose-Fermimixturetune-outtrapsympatheticcooling

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ultracold Fermi gases are usually prepared by evaporative cooling and then manipulated adiabatically, because any coupling to the environment adds entropy. This paper demonstrates a different route: keep the fermions in contact with a cold bosonic bath and compress them, so the Fermi temperature T_F rises while the absolute temperature stays pinned by the bath, lowering the ratio T/T_F. They report T/T_F=0.024 for a balanced two-component lithium gas, with thermometry based on the erbium bath and a calculated heating offset, making the gas one of the most deeply degenerate fermionic systems realized. The key dynamical result is that the interspecies thermalization time stays about 100 ms from T/T_F=0.06 to 0.18, because Pauli blocking of collisions is exactly compensated by the reduced fermionic heat capacity. A sympathetic reader would care because this removes the reliance on adiabatic state transformations and opens direct entropy removal in lattices, box traps, or spin-imbalanced configurations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a compensation identity: for a degenerate Fermi gas, Pauli blocking reduces the Er-Li collision rate by a factor proportional to T/T_F, while the fermionic heat capacity C_V = π² k_B N_Li T/T_F is carried by the same thermally active shell of width ~T/T_F around the Fermi energy. The 1/e thermalization rate therefore takes the degeneracy-independent form 1/τ_th = n̄ σ_ErLi v_F ξ / 3, where n̄ is the overlap density, σ_ErLi = 4πa² the interspecies scattering cross section, v_F the Fermi velocity, and ξ = 4 m_Li m_Er/(m_Li+m_Er)² ≈ 0.13 the energy-transfer fraction per collision. The experimental enabler is a tune-out wavelength at 841 nm where the erbium polariza

What would settle it

Measure the lithium temperature directly at maximum compression using high-resolution methods that do not rely on the erbium cloud (e.g., momentum-resolved or radio-frequency spectroscopy). If the measured T_Li/T_F exceeds 0.031—the paper's own upper bound—or if the difference T_Li − T_Er does not track γ_heat × τ_th when the tune-out beam power is varied, the reported degeneracy would not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a two-component Fermi gas can be cooled by isothermal compression: a species-selective optical trap at an erbium tune-out wavelength deepens the lithium trapping potential, raising the Fermi temperature T_F, while the fermions remain in thermal contact with a bath of bosonic erbium atoms that pins the absolute temperature. Starting from a double-degenerate mixture, the authors report a reduced temperature T/T_F = 0.024^{+0.007}, with the uncertainty dominated by an estimated steady-state heating offset. They further claim that the interspecies thermalization time—about 100 ms—is independent of T/T_F down to deep degeneracy, because Pauli blocking suppresses

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the erbium bath temperature equals the lithium temperature at the coldest point and that the calculated 36 nK steady-state heating offset captures all extra heat; if thermal contact is incomplete or the scattering model is wrong, the lithium could be hotter than the reported T/T_F=0.024.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At T/T_F=0.024 the entropy per particle is about 0.24 k_B, and the paper argues this is not a fundamental floor: lower bath temperatures or reduced light scattering would deepen the degeneracy further.
The measured ~100 ms thermalization time being independent of degeneracy means sympathetic cooling by a heavy bosonic bath remains efficient at the few-percent level, not just near T/T_F ≈ 0.1.
The observed (T/T_F)^{-1} isotropization time is a direct signature of Pauli blocking in shape relaxation, distinct from energy exchange, and quantifies how the Fermi sea resists deformation.
Because compression only changes the Fermi temperature and leaves the bath temperature nearly fixed, the protocol works in any external potential—the paper explicitly names optical lattices, box traps, and spin-imbalanced systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the degeneracy-independent thermalization time holds below T/T_F = 0.02, isothermal compression would be limited mainly by bath temperature and photon-scattering heating, not by Pauli blocking; this can be tested by extending quench measurements to colder starting points.
The same cancellation argument should apply to other heavy-light Bose-Fermi mixtures, so switching erbium to the narrower 1299 nm transition or other lanthanide-alkali pairs with low tune-out scattering may push T/T_F lower without new physics.
The contrast between degeneracy-independent thermalization and 1/(T/T_F) isotropization suggests a practical rule: energy exchange with the bath does not require frequent shape-relaxing collisions, so optimizing cooling in complex traps should focus on maintaining cloud overlap rather than maximizing collision rate.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

What's new: this paper demonstrates isothermal compression of a fermionic gas in a bosonic bath using a species-selective tune-out trap, reaching T/TF = 0.024(7) as inferred from Er thermometry plus a calculated heating offset. That is a genuinely different cooling paradigm from the usual adiabatic preparation, and if it holds up it matters for lattice and box-trap simulators. The paper also gives a clean parameter-free derivation of why tau_th should be independent of T/TF: Pauli blocking suppresses collisions proportionally to the thermally active fraction, and the heat capacity is carried by the same fraction, so the two cancel. The contrast with the measured (T/TF)^-1 isotropization time is a nice check that the physics is not just a fit. Credit is due for the control measurements, the stability data, and the extracted scattering length.

The soft spots are real and concentrated at the coldest point. The headline T/TF is not actually measured on the fermions. It is T_Er plus Delta_T = gamma_heat * tau_th, with tau_th taken to be ~100 ms all the way down. But the tau_th data in Fig. 3c extend to T/TF ~ 0.06, while the supplement explicitly states that direct polylog fitting of Li images cannot resolve below T/TF ~ 0.08. So the flatness of tau_th—the mechanistic centerpiece—is partly inferred inside a detection-blind region. If tau_th grows toward lower degeneracy, the heating offset is underestimated and the Li temperature is higher than quoted. A factor-of-two change adds ~0.007 T/TF; a factor-of-four pushes it to ~0.045. That is the difference between a record and a good result. The authors do acknowledge the offset and quote an upper bound, but the bound itself uses the disputed tau_th.

The central idea does not collapse: the rate-equation derivation is sound, the thermal-contact test is convincing, and the compression data show the expected isothermal signatures. But the strongest quantitative claim depends on an extrapolation that starts at the stated limit of the only fermion thermometer used. The paper also says data and scripts will be on Zenodo, not that they are deposited.

Who this is for: cold-atom experimentalists and anyone working on fermion cooling or mass-imbalanced mixtures. It deserves a serious referee, but the referee should push for a direct or cross-checked fermion thermometry at the coldest point, and for the tau_th measurement to be re-analyzed with the detection-floor caveat made explicit. I would not cite it as a definitive T/TF record without that check, but I would cite the protocol and the tau_th cancellation argument once the data are out.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a new cooling protocol for a two-component Fermi gas of 6Li immersed in a 166Er bath. A species-selective 841 nm tune-out trap compresses the Li cloud while Er acts as a heat reservoir; the authors report reaching T/TF = 0.024^{+0.007} at the strongest compression. They characterize thermal contact by the relaxation of a quench-induced Li anisotropy and measure the interspecies thermalization time τ_th ≈ 100 ms, which they find independent of T/TF between 0.06 and 0.18, while the isotropization time grows as (T/TF)^{-1}. A rate-equation model with a Pauli-blocking suppression factor and a Sommerfeld heat capacity yields a parameter-free cancellation that explains the flat τ_th. They also report a double-degenerate Er BEC plus degenerate Li gas, a background s-wave scattering length |a_ErLi| = (49 ± 13) a0, and low heating from the tune-out trap. The headline T/TF is obtained from Er-bath thermometry plus a steady-state heating correction ΔT = γ_heat τ_th, not from direct Li thermometry.

Significance. Cooling fermions by isothermal compression in a bosonic bath, rather than by adiabatic preparation, is conceptually important and, if validated, would be a practical route to low-entropy fermions in optical lattices, box traps, and spin-imbalanced systems. The paper's main strengths are the low-dissipation tune-out trap for Er-Li, the direct thermal-contact test via anisotropy relaxation, the parameter-free derivation of the τ_th independence, and the first characterization of the background Er-Li scattering length in this mixture. The central risk is that the deepest reported T/TF relies on the same τ_th whose T/TF-independence is inferred from data beginning at the detection limit of the only Li thermometer. This coupling makes the headline and the central mechanism jointly vulnerable and needs to be addressed before the claim can be accepted at face value.

major comments (2)

[Supplement, 'Temperature offset in steady state'; main text Fig. 2 and Fig. 3(c)] The headline T/TF = 0.024^{+0.007} is not a direct fermion measurement. It is T_Er plus ΔT = γ_heat τ_th ≈ 36 nK ≈ 0.007 T_F. The correction uses τ_th ≈ 100 ms, the very quantity whose T/TF-independence is the paper's mechanistic centerpiece. The direct Li polylog thermometer has a stated detection floor of T/TF ≈ 0.08 (Fig. S2), yet Fig. 3(c) reports τ_th down to T/TF ≈ 0.06, inside the blind region. If τ_th grows with degeneracy as τ_iso does, the cold-point offset is underestimated: for T_F ≈ 5 μK, a factor-2 increase in τ_th adds another ≈ 0.007 T_F (T/TF ≈ 0.031) and a factor-4 increase gives ≈ 0.045. The headline degeneracy and the thermalization-independence claim therefore rest on the same extrapolation. Please provide either direct τ_th measurements below T/TF ≈ 0.08 with a thermometer capable of resolving those temperatures, or an independent upper bound on τ_th at T/TF ≈ 0.024
[Supplement, Eqs. (S3)–(S4)] The derivation of τ_th independence assumes the Sommerfeld forms for Pauli blocking (π²T/3T_F) and heat capacity (π²N k_B T/T_F), and assumes linear response. The quench used to measure τ_th is finite (the text says 'a small but measurable amount of energy is inserted'), and the relaxation is fit with a single exponential. If the quench amplitude is not in the linear regime, the measured single-exponential relaxation time is an effective finite-amplitude time, not the linear-response τ_th used in the ΔT = γ_heat τ_th steady-state formula. Please state the quench energy in units of k_B T_F and show that the extracted τ_th is amplitude-independent, or extrapolate to zero quench amplitude.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract and main text] Please state explicitly that the quoted T/TF = 0.024 is the Er bath temperature with an upper-bound heating correction, not a direct Li thermometry value. The current wording in the abstract could be read as a direct fermionic measurement.
[Fig. 3(c)] Specify which thermometer defines the abscissa (Er-based or Li-based) and justify the lower limit 0.06, since the text mentions Er bath temperatures down to 0.17 μK which, with T_F ≈ 4.7 μK, would correspond to T/TF ≈ 0.036.
[Fig. 2 caption] Clarify which symbols in panel (a) are direct Li thermometry and which are Er-based sympathetic thermometry, and indicate the T/TF range where the direct points are no longer reliable (the dashed line at the detection floor).
[Supplement, Eq. (S3)] In the expression for dΔT/dt, explicitly state the regime in which the NLi/NEr term and the T/TF-dependent term are dropped; as written, the approximation is stated only in words.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central thermalization-time derivation is parameter-free; the deepest T/TF point relies on a stated thermometry extrapolation, and the only self-citation is apparatus-level.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the central result—tau_th independent of T/T_F—is not equivalent to its inputs. The Supplement derives 1/tau_th = nbar*sigma_{ErLi}*v_F*xi/3 (Eq. S4) from an explicit rate equation (Eq. S3) in which the Pauli-blocking suppression factor pi^2*T/(3T_F) and the fermionic heat capacity C_{V,Li} = pi^2*k_B*N_Li*T/T_F are both obtained from the Sommerfeld expansion; they cancel exactly without any fitted parameter. The scattering length |a_{ErLi}| is then extracted from the measured tau_th as an output, and the T/T_F-independence is read from the data (Fig. 3c), not imposed by the formula. The deepest quoted degeneracy T/T_F = 0.024^{+0.007} is not a direct Li measurement: the paper uses Er bath temperature plus ΔT = gamma_heat*tau_th (Supplement, 'Temperature offset in steady state'), with tau_th ≈100 ms measured in the same setup. The Supplement explicitly states that direct polylog fits cannot resolve T/T_F below ≈0.08 (Fig. S2), so the coldest tau_th points and the final T/T_F involve a stated detection-limit extrapolation. That is an experimental caveat, not a circular reduction. The sole self-citation, Ref. [24], supplies the tune-out trap wavelength; the present paper independently confirms the low heating (constant Er temperature without Li), so the self-citation is apparatus-level and not load-bearing. No fitted parameter is renamed a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior work by the same authors.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard kinetic theory, Sommerfeld heat-capacity formulas, and thermometry models. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The main non-standard input is the tune-out trap assumption, supported by prior same-group work and control measurements.

free parameters (1)

Er-Li background s-wave scattering length |a_ErLi| = 49 +/- 13 a0
Extracted from the measured tau_th via Eq. S4: tau_th^-1 = n_bar * sigma * v_F * xi / 3. Used for mixture characterization, not for the central cooling claim.

assumptions (6)

standard math Sommerfeld heat capacity of a degenerate Fermi gas: C_{V,Li} = pi^2 k_B N_Li T_Li / T_F
Used in Eq. S3 to derive the degeneracy independence of tau_th.
domain assumption Pauli blocking reduces the effective Er-Li collision rate by the thermally active fraction pi^2 T_Li / (3 T_F)
Stated in the Supplement 'Interspecies thermalization'; central to the cancellation argument.
domain assumption s-wave collision cross section sigma = 4 pi a^2 and energy transfer fraction xi = 4 m_Li m_Er / (m_Li + m_Er)^2 ~ 0.13
Standard kinetic theory for heavy-light collisions, used in Eq. S4 and in the scattering-length extraction.
domain assumption The Er bath is large and weakly perturbed: N_Li / N_Er << 1, so a temperature-dependent term in Eq. S3 is dropped.
Stated in the Supplement; necessary for treating Er as a constant-temperature reservoir.
domain assumption The 841 nm tune-out beam does not trap or appreciably heat Er, while it traps Li with a calculable off-resonant scattering rate.
From prior work by the same group [24]; validated in this paper by control measurements without Li.
domain assumption The Li spin states |1>,|2> form a non-interacting mixture at 1.3 G.
Reference [31]; used for treating Li as an ideal Fermi gas in density fits and heat-capacity estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Isothermal compression of a Fermi gas to deep quantum degeneracy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PFRSOIF2

@misc{pith2026260715616,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Isothermal compression of a Fermi gas to deep quantum degeneracy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PFRSOIF2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15616}
}

abstract

The standard approach for generating deeply degenerate quantum gases is evaporative or sympathetic cooling in a harmonic trap, after which the gas has reached its minimum entropy. All subsequent state transformations rely on adiabatic changes of a closed system, and coupling to the environment or non-adiabatic processes monotonically increase the entropy. Here, we demonstrate that this experimental paradigm can be bypassed by utilizing species-selective trapping with a low-dissipation optical tune-out trap in a dual-species mixture. We successfully reduce the entropy of a two-component fermionic quantum gas via isothermal compression within a bosonic bath, reaching deep quantum degeneracy of $T/T_F = 0.024^{+0.007}$, with $T_F$ the Fermi temperature. By characterizing the cross-dimensional relaxation and thermalization, we demonstrate that cooling light fermions with heavy bosons remains efficient and fast, even deep in the degenerate regime, where the thermalization time is found to be independent of $T/T_F$. Our results pave the way for direct cooling within optical lattices, box traps, or other complex potentials, thereby eliminating the reliance on adiabatic state transformations to reach strongly interacting many-body regimes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15616 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Isothermal compression at three different initial tem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. (a) Sketch of the isotropization and thermalization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

[1]

Bloch, J

I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

2008
[2]

Zwerger, ed.,The BCS-BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2012)

W. Zwerger, ed.,The BCS-BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2012)

2012
[3]

Gross and I

C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science357, 995 (2017)

2017
[4]

J¨ ordens, N

R. J¨ ordens, N. Strohmaier, K. G¨ unter, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, A Mott insulator of fermionic atoms in an optical lattice, Nature455, 204 (2008)

2008
[5]

Schneider, L

U. Schneider, L. Hackerm¨ uller, S. Will, r. Best, I. Bloch, T. A. Costi, R. W. Helmes, D. Rasch, and A. Rosch, Metallic and insulating phases of repulsively interacting fermions in a 3D optical lattice, Science322, 1520 (2008)

2008
[6]

Greif, T

D. Greif, T. Uehlinger, G. Jotzu, L. Tarruell, and T. Esslinger, Short-range quantum magnetism of ultra- cold fermions in an optical lattice, Science340, 1307 (2013)

2013
[7]

R. A. Hart, P. M. Duarte, T.-L. Yang, X. Liu, T. Paiva, E. Khatami, R. T. Scalettar, N. Trivedi, D. A. Huse, and R. G. Hulet, Observation of antiferromagnetic cor- relations in the Hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Nature519, 211 (2015)

2015
[8]

T. A. Hilker, G. Salomon, F. Grusdt, A. Omran, M. Boll, E. Demler, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Revealing hidden an- tiferromagnetic correlations in doped Hubbard chains via string correlators, Science357, 484 (2017)

2017

Show all 64 references

[9]

Shao, Y.-X

H.-J. Shao, Y.-X. Wang, D.-Z. Zhu, Y.-S. Zhu, H.-N. Sun, S.-Y. Chen, C. Zhang, Z.-J. Fan, Y. Deng, X.-C. Yao, Y.- 6 A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Antiferromagnetic phase tran- sition in a 3D fermionic Hubbard model, Nature632, 267 (2024)

2024
[10]

M. Xu, L. H. Kendrick, A. Kale, Y. Gang, C. Feng, S. Zhang, A. W. Young, M. Lebrat, and M. Greiner, A neutral-atom Hubbard quantum simulator in the cryo- genic regime, Nature642, 909 (2025)

2025
[11]

Hartke, B

T. Hartke, B. Oreg, C. Feng, C. Turnbaugh, J. Hertkorn, Y.-Y. He, N. Jia, E. Khatami, S. Zhang, and M. Zwier- lein, Competition of fermion pairing, magnetism, and charge order in the spin-doped attractive Hubbard gas (2025), arXiv:2511.10605

2025
[12]

Chalopin, P

T. Chalopin, P. Bojovi´ c, S. Wang, T. Franz, A. Sinha, Z. Wang, D. Bourgund, J. Obermeyer, F. Grusdt, A. Bohrdt, L. Pollet, A. Wietek, A. Georges, T. Hilker, and I. Bloch, Observation of emergent scaling of spin– charge correlations at the onset of the pseudogap, Proc. Natl. ...

2026
[13]

L. H. Kendrick, A. Kale, Y. Gang, A. D. Deters, M. Lebrat, A. W. Young, and M. Greiner, Pseudo- gap in a Fermi-Hubbard quantum simulator (2025), arXiv:2509.18075

2025
[14]

Fulde and R

P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field, Phys. Rev.135, A550 (1964)

1964
[15]

A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonuniform state of superconductors, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.47, 1136 (1964)

1964
[16]

Radzihovsky and D

L. Radzihovsky and D. E. Sheehy, Imbalanced Feshbach- resonant Fermi Gases, Rep. Prog. Phys.73, 076501 (2010)

2010
[17]

Bohrdt, L

A. Bohrdt, L. Homeier, C. Reinmoser, E. Demler, and F. Grusdt, Exploration of doped quantum magnets with ultracold atoms, Ann. Phys. Special Issue on Philip W. Anderson,435, 168651 (2021)

2021
[18]

Hofstetter, J

W. Hofstetter, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, High-temperature superfluidity of fermionic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 220407 (2002)

2002
[19]

Keimer, S

B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature518, 179 (2015)

2015
[20]

L. J. LeBlanc and J. H. Thywissen, Species-specific opti- cal lattices, Phys. Rev. A75, 053612 (2007)

2007
[21]

Catani, G

J. Catani, G. Barontini, G. Lamporesi, F. Rabatti, G. Thalhammer, F. Minardi, S. Stringari, and M. Ingus- cio, Entropy Exchange in a Mixture of Ultracold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 140401 (2009)

2009
[22]

V. D. Vaidya, J. Tiamsuphat, S. L. Rolston, and J. V. Porto, Degenerate Bose-Fermi Mixtures of Rubidium and Ytterbium, Phys. Rev. A92, 043604 (2015)

2015
[23]

Lippi, M

E. Lippi, M. Gerken, S. H¨ afner, M. Repp, R. Pires, M. Rautenberg, T. Krom, E. D. Kuhnle, B. Tran, J. Ul- manis, B. Zhu, L. Chomaz, and M. Weidem¨ uller, An Ex- perimental Platform for Studying the Heteronuclear Efi- mov Effect with an Ultracold Mixture of 6Li and 133Cs Atoms...

2024
[24]

De Martino, F

A. De Martino, F. Kiesel, J. Auch, K. Karpov, and C. Gross, Dissipationless tune-out trapping for a lanthanide–alkali-metal quantum gas mixture, Phys. Rev. A112, L051304 (2025)

2025
[25]

Hadzibabic, S

Z. Hadzibabic, S. Gupta, C. Stan, C. Schunck, M. Zwier- lein, K. Dieckmann, and W. Ketterle, Fiftyfold improve- ment in the number of quantum degenerate fermionic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 160401 (2003)

2003
[26]

Delehaye, S

M. Delehaye, S. Laurent, I. Ferrier-Barbut, S. Jin, F. Chevy, and C. Salomon, Critical velocity and dissipa- tion of an ultracold Bose-Fermi counterflow, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 265303 (2015)

2015
[27]

Baroni, G

C. Baroni, G. Lamporesi, and M. Zaccanti, Quantum mixtures of ultracold gases of neutral atoms, Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 736 (2024)

2024
[28]

Sch¨ afer, N

F. Sch¨ afer, N. Mizukami, and Y. Takahashi, Feshbach res- onances of large-mass-imbalance Er-Li mixtures, Phys. Rev. A105, 012816 (2022)

2022
[29]

See Supplemental Material for detailed information
[30]

Krstaji´ c, P

M. Krstaji´ c, P. e. Juh´ asz, J. c. r. v. Kuˇ cera, L. R. Hofer, G. Lamb, A. L. Marchant, and R. P. Smith, Character- ization of three-body loss in 166Er and optimized pro- duction of large Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A108, 063301 (2023)

2023
[31]

Z¨ urn, T

G. Z¨ urn, T. Lompe, A. N. Wenz, S. Jochim, P. S. Julienne, and J. M. Hutson, Precise characterization of 6Li Feshbach resonances using trap-sideband-resolved RF spectroscopy of weakly bound molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 135301 (2013)

2013
[32]

J. H. Becher, S. Baier, K. Aikawa, M. Lepers, J.-F. Wyart, O. Dulieu, and F. Ferlaino, Anisotropic polariz- ability of erbium atoms, Phys. Rev. A97, 012509 (2018)

2018
[33]

Kiruga, C

A. Kiruga, C. Cheung, D. Filin, P. Barakhshan, A. Bhos- ale, V. Badhan, B. Arora, R. Eigenmann, and M. S. Safronova, Portal for high-precision atomic data and computation (2025), arXiv:2506.08170

2025 arXiv
[34]

H. Y. Ban, M. Jacka, J. L. Hanssen, J. Reader, and J. J. McClelland, Laser cooling transitions in atomic erbium, Opt. Express13, 3185 (2005)

2005
[35]

Ketterle and M

W. Ketterle and M. W. Zwierlein, Making, probing and understanding ultracold Fermi gases, Riv. Nuovo Ci- mento31, 247 (2008)

2008
[36]

Ketterle, D

W. Ketterle, D. S. Durfee, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Making, probing and understanding Bose-Einstein con- densates (1999), arXiv:cond-mat/9904034

1999 arXiv
[37]

R. S. Lous, I. Fritsche, M. Jag, B. Huang, and R. Grimm, Thermometry of a deeply degenerate Fermi gas with a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A95, 053627 (2017)

2017
[38]

Presilla and R

C. Presilla and R. Onofrio, Cooling dynamics of ultracold two-species Fermi-Bose mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 030404 (2003)

2003
[39]

Onofrio, Cooling and thermometry of atomic Fermi gases, Phys

R. Onofrio, Cooling and thermometry of atomic Fermi gases, Phys. Usp.59, 1129 (2016)

2016
[40]

Mudrich, S

M. Mudrich, S. Kraft, K. Singer, R. Grimm, A. Mosk, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Sympathetic Cooling with Two Atomic Species in an Optical Trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 253001 (2002)

2002
[41]

Silber, S

C. Silber, S. G¨ unther, C. Marzok, B. Deh, P. W. Courteille, and C. Zimmermann, Quantum-degenerate mixture of fermionic lithium and bosonic rubidium gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 170408 (2005)

2005
[42]

Marzok, B

C. Marzok, B. Deh, P. W. Courteille, and C. Zimmer- mann, Ultracold thermalization of 7Li and 87Rb, Phys. Rev. A76, 052704 (2007)

2007
[43]

B. J. DeSalvo, K. Patel, J. Johansen, and C. Chin, Observation of a degenerate Fermi gas trapped by a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 233401 (2017)

2017
[44]

Ciamei, S

A. Ciamei, S. Finelli, A. Cosco, M. Inguscio, A. Trenkwalder, and M. Zaccanti, Double-degenerate Fermi mixtures of 6Li and 53Cr atoms, Phys. Rev. A106, 7 053318 (2022)

2022
[45]

Ravensbergen, V

C. Ravensbergen, V. Corre, E. Soave, M. Kreyer, E. Kir- ilov, and R. Grimm, Production of a degenerate Fermi- Fermi mixture of dysprosium and potassium atoms, Phys. Rev. A98, 063624 (2018)

2018
[46]

Ye, L.-Y

Z.-X. Ye, L.-Y. Xie, Z. Guo, X.-B. Ma, G.-R. Wang, L. You, and M. K. Tey, Double-degenerate Bose-Fermi mixture of strontium and lithium, Phys. Rev. A102, 033307 (2020)

2020
[47]

A. H. Hansen, A. Y. Khramov, W. H. Dowd, A. O. Jami- son, B. Plotkin-Swing, R. J. Roy, and S. Gupta, Produc- tion of quantum-degenerate mixtures of ytterbium and lithium with controllable interspecies overlap, Phys. Rev. A87, 013615 (2013)

2013
[48]

H. Hara, Y. Takasu, Y. Yamaoka, J. M. Doyle, and Y. Takahashi, Quantum degenerate mixtures of alkali and alkaline-earth-like atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 205304 (2011)

2011
[49]

Pires, J

R. Pires, J. Ulmanis, S. H¨ afner, M. Repp, A. Arias, E. D. Kuhnle, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Observation of Efimov res- onances in a mixture with extreme mass imbalance, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 250404 (2014)

2014
[50]

Delannoy, S

G. Delannoy, S. G. Murdoch, V. Boyer, V. Josse, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, Understanding the produc- tion of dual Bose-Einstein condensation with sympa- thetic cooling, Phys. Rev. A63, 051602(R) (2001)

2001
[51]

Kalia, J

J. Kalia, J. Rivera, R. R. Emran, W. J. S. Hernandez, K. Kwon, and R. J. Fletcher, Creation of a degenerate Bose-Bose mixture of erbium and lithium atoms, Phys. Rev. A113, 013321 (2026)

2026
[52]

A. Mosk, S. Kraft, M. Mudrich, K. Singer, W. Wohlleben, R. Grimm, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Mixture of ultracold lithium and cesium atoms in an optical dipole trap, Appl. Phys. B73, 791 (2001)

2001
[53]

O. J. Luiten, M. W. Reynolds, and J. T. M. Walraven, Kinetic theory of the evaporative cooling of a trapped gas, Phys. Rev. A53, 381 (1996)

1996
[54]

C.-L. Hung, X. Zhang, N. Gemelke, and C. Chin, Accelerating evaporative cooling of atoms into Bose- Einstein condensation in optical traps, Phys. Rev. A78, 011604(R) (2008)

2008
[55]

Timmermans and R

E. Timmermans and R. Cˆ ot´ e, Superfluidity in Sympa- thetic Cooling with Atomic Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 3419 (1998)

1998
[56]

Ho and Q

T.-L. Ho and Q. Zhou, Squeezing out the entropy of fermions in optical lattices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 6916 (2009)

2009
[57]

Bernier, C

J.-S. Bernier, C. Kollath, A. Georges, L. De Leo, F. Ger- bier, C. Salomon, and M. K¨ ohl, Cooling fermionic atoms in optical lattices by shaping the confinement, Phys. Rev. A79, 061601 (2009)

2009
[58]

Griessner, A

A. Griessner, A. J. Daley, S. R. Clark, D. Jaksch, and P. Zoller, Dark-state cooling of atoms by superfluid im- mersion, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 220403 (2006)

2006
[59]

Frisch, K

A. Frisch, K. Aikawa, M. Mark, A. Rietzler, J. Schindler, E. Zupaniˇ c, R. Grimm, and F. Ferlaino, Narrow-line magneto-optical trap for erbium, Phys. Rev. A85, 051401 (2012)

2012
[60]

Lunden, L

W. Lunden, L. Du, M. Cantara, P. Barral, A. O. Jamison, and W. Ketterle, Enhancing the capture velocity of a Dy magneto-optical trap with two-stage slowing, Phys. Rev. A101, 063403 (2020)

2020
[61]

Scherf, O

W. Scherf, O. Khait, H. J¨ ager, and L. Windholz, Re- measurement of the transition frequencies, fine struc- ture splitting and isotope shift of the resonance lines of lithium, sodium and potassium, Z. Phys. D36, 31 (1996)

1996
[62]

Grimm, M

R. Grimm, M. Weidem¨ uller, and Y. B. Ovchin- nikov, Optical dipole traps for neutral atoms (1999), arXiv:physics/9902072

1999 arXiv
[63]

Le Kien, P

F. Le Kien, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Dy- namical polarizability of atoms in arbitrary light fields: General theory and application to cesium, Eur. Phys. J. D67, 92 (2013)

2013
[64]

angled-slowing beams

M. Lepers, J.-F. Wyart, and O. Dulieu, Anisotropic op- tical trapping of ultracold erbium atoms, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022505 (2014). 8 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL Detailed description of the mixture preparation The initial stages of the experiment, that is, the load- ing of the MOTs, ...

2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Bloch, J

I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

2008

[2] [2]

Zwerger, ed.,The BCS-BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2012)

W. Zwerger, ed.,The BCS-BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2012)

2012

[3] [3]

Gross and I

C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science357, 995 (2017)

2017

[4] [4]

J¨ ordens, N

R. J¨ ordens, N. Strohmaier, K. G¨ unter, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, A Mott insulator of fermionic atoms in an optical lattice, Nature455, 204 (2008)

2008

[5] [5]

Schneider, L

U. Schneider, L. Hackerm¨ uller, S. Will, r. Best, I. Bloch, T. A. Costi, R. W. Helmes, D. Rasch, and A. Rosch, Metallic and insulating phases of repulsively interacting fermions in a 3D optical lattice, Science322, 1520 (2008)

2008

[6] [6]

Greif, T

D. Greif, T. Uehlinger, G. Jotzu, L. Tarruell, and T. Esslinger, Short-range quantum magnetism of ultra- cold fermions in an optical lattice, Science340, 1307 (2013)

2013

[7] [7]

R. A. Hart, P. M. Duarte, T.-L. Yang, X. Liu, T. Paiva, E. Khatami, R. T. Scalettar, N. Trivedi, D. A. Huse, and R. G. Hulet, Observation of antiferromagnetic cor- relations in the Hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Nature519, 211 (2015)

2015

[8] [8]

T. A. Hilker, G. Salomon, F. Grusdt, A. Omran, M. Boll, E. Demler, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Revealing hidden an- tiferromagnetic correlations in doped Hubbard chains via string correlators, Science357, 484 (2017)

2017