Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 61 references

Full-band reciprocal parametric amplification in coupled oscillator arrays

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that standing-wave parametric modulation can make an entire band of a coupled-resonator array amplify at once, preserving the band's finite bandwidth and reciprocal wave transport.

desk verdict A genuinely new, well-verified design rule for full-band parametric amplification; the main soft spot is an under-tested gap assumption, but the paper deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16539 v1 pith:I3VMSQXL submitted 2026-07-17 physics.app-ph

Benjamin Kauffman , Jayson Paulose This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-ph
keywords parametricamplificationresonanceFloquet-BlochbandscoupledoscillatorarraysMathieuequationmechanicalmetamaterialswavepacketmanipulationreciprocal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Parametric amplification normally only works in narrow frequency windows: a single oscillator responds when the modulation frequency is near twice its natural frequency, and a band of modes only resonates where the detuning is small. This paper argues that in one-dimensional coupled-resonator arrays with cosine-like isolated bands, the whole band can be brought into resonance at once. A spatially uniform modulation at twice the mid-band frequency makes the amplified band perfectly flat, so every mode oscillates at half the pump frequency and grows in place. A standing-wave modulation with period twice the lattice spacing instead folds the band onto itself, pairing modes at q and q+π/a; choosing Ω=ω(0)+ω(π/a) makes the resonance condition hold across the entire band and preserves the static bandwidth and group velocity. The paper derives a simple threshold condition for both cases, verifies it against exact Floquet-Bloch spectra for hundreds of random parameter sets, and demonstrates distortion-free wave-packet amplification and lossless temporal splitting in simulations.

What carries the argument

The central reduction is projection onto the static Bloch eigenmodes: writing the displacement as u_q(t)=Σ_β x_{βq}(t) e_β(q) converts the modulated equations into a set of coupled Mathieu equations, one per wavevector, with resonance parameters V_{αβ}(q)=e_α†(q)K_1(q)e_β(q). These overlaps measure how effectively the modulation couples pairs of static modes; they renormalize the bare modulation strength δ into an effective δ′(q). For the standing wave, a two-cell supercell and a translation-operator argument force V_{11}=V_{22}=0, leaving only the q ↔ q+π/a coupling, so the two-mode Mathieu system has a closed-form Floquet exponent. The threshold for full-band resonance then comes from the

What would settle it

Solve the exact Floquet-Bloch problem for a chain whose target band has a strong second Fourier harmonic (next-nearest-neighbor coupling comparable to nearest-neighbor), with standing-wave modulation at Ω=ω(0)+ω(π/a). If the smallest δ giving Im μ(q)>0 at every q differs from Eq. (22) by more than O(δ²), or if an adjacent band turns unstable first, the isolated-cosine assumption is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is a design rule: for an isolated band with cosine-like dispersion, full-band parametric amplification is achieved by a standing-wave modulation of stiffness at frequency Ω = ω(0) + ω(π/a), with modulation strength above 1 − 2ω_e/Ω = ± δ'_e ω_e/(2Ω), where ω_e is the band-edge frequency and δ'_e is the modulation strength renormalized by the Bloch overlap of the two coupled modes. The uniform-modulation strategy is the degenerate limit: it couples +ω(q) to −ω(q) and yields a fully amplified but dispersionless band. The standing-wave strategy couples +ω(q) to −ω(q+π/a), which preserves a cosine-like real dispersion and keeps reciprocity intact. Both cases reduce each wavevector'

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the target band being isolated from other bands (so neglected interband couplings stay small at linear order) and close enough to a pure cosine that the residual higher-harmonic detuning can be overcome within the allowed modulation strength δ ≤ 1.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A wave packet containing many wavevectors grows uniformly across its spectrum once the band is fully resonant, so broadband signals can be amplified with minimal distortion, as demonstrated for both stationary packets (uniform modulation) and propagating packets (standing-wave modulation).
  • Uniform modulation gives an amplified band whose real Floquet frequency is exactly Ω/2 everywhere, freezing the packet in place while it grows; standing-wave modulation keeps the static bandwidth, so the packet keeps moving while amplifying.
  • A finite-time 'temporal slab' of uniform modulation splits an incoming packet into transmitted and reflected packets whose combined energy can exceed the input; the paper derives quantitative transmission and reflection formulas that match simulation.
  • The conditions depend only on the static band and the modulation field, so any platform with isolated cosine-like bands—coupled optical resonators, Josephson-junction arrays, mechanical lattices—can use the same design rule.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that if the same folding argument holds in two dimensions, standing-wave modulation on a flat-band lattice should amplify the whole flat band; the paper mentions this as ongoing work but does not demonstrate it.
  • Because the standing-wave scheme preserves q→−q symmetry, it offers a path to broadband reciprocal amplifiers; a head-to-head comparison of gain, noise, and pump power against traveling-wave (luminal) amplifiers would clarify where each is preferable.
  • The flat amplified band from uniform modulation behaves like a degenerate parametric amplifier at every wavevector simultaneously, which suggests whole-band phase-sensitive noise squeezing; the paper notes the noise question but does not compute it.
  • A direct experimental test would implement the standing-wave modulation in a tunable membrane-resonator array, measure wave-packet gain at the band edge as δ crosses the predicted threshold, and see whether growth appears exactly at Eq. (22).
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes and analyzes a mechanism for parametric amplification across an entire band in one-dimensional coupled-oscillator arrays. For a spatially uniform modulation, the dynamics of an isolated band is reduced to a wavevector-dependent Mathieu equation (Eq. 13), leading to the full-band threshold condition Eq. (17); at resonance the real part of the Floquet band becomes flat, so wave packets are amplified in place. For a standing-wave modulation with period 2a, the folded band is reduced to a pair of coupled Mathieu equations (Eq. 19), giving the Floquet frequencies Eq. (20) and threshold condition Eq. (22); here the real part of the amplified band retains a finite, cosine-like dispersion. The analytical predictions are tested against exact Floquet-Bloch calculations for 200 random parameter sets for each modulation scheme and against wave-packet simulations, including flat-band amplification, dispersive-band amplification, and temporal-slab splitting.

Significance. If the framework holds, it provides a simple, parameter-free design rule for broadband reciprocal parametric amplification in resonator arrays, with potential applications in phononic, photonic, and microwave platforms. The paper's strengths are the analytical expressions (Eqs. 17 and 22) derived from the static eigenmodes and modulation matrix without fitting, the systematic numerical verification over 200 random parameter sets per modulation scheme, and the quantitative agreement of wave-packet simulations with Floquet predictions. The main weakness is that the validity domain of the single-band/two-band projection is not quantified, so the claimed genericity of the mechanism is not fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II B 2, Eq. (12)] The derivation drops all interband couplings V_{αβ} to bands other than the resonant pair, justified only by the phrase 'gapped from other bands'. No quantitative condition is given for how large the gap must be relative to δ|V_{αβ}| and to the detunings of other possible resonances. For a neighboring band β' with detuning Δ = |Ω - (ω_α ± ω_β')|, the off-resonant correction to the Floquet exponents is of order δ²|V_{αβ'}|²/Δ, which can become comparable to the threshold growth rate when Δ is not large compared with δ|V_{αβ'}|; in that regime Eqs. (17) and (22) and even the existence of a clean full-band resonance can change. Please provide a sufficient gap condition (e.g., |ω_α ± ω_β' - Ω| ≫ δ|V_{αβ'}| for all β' outside the resonant pair) and test at least one parameter set in which the neighboring band gap is deliberately small. The random sweeps in Figs. 2(c) and 3(c) do not report th
  2. [Sec. II D, Eq. (22)] The standing-wave threshold assumes that the static dispersion is dominated by its cos(qa) Fourier component and that the limiting wavevector is the folded band edge ±π/(2a). The paper notes that higher harmonics are allowed but does not state how small they must be for Eq. (22) to be valid. For a band with a non-negligible even higher harmonic, the detuning |Ω - ω_1(q) - ω_2(q)| = |2 Σ_n even B_n cos(nqa)| can have its maximum inside the Brillouin zone rather than at the edge, so the threshold would be set by a different wavevector and Eq. (22) would not apply. Please state a sufficient condition on the Fourier coefficients (e.g., |B_n|/|B_1| small compared with δ|V_{12}|/ω_e², or an equivalent bound) or demonstrate a case with substantial higher-harmonic content and show how the threshold is modified.
  3. [Sec. II C, Eq. (17)] The uniform-modulation threshold is derived by requiring resonance at q = π/a, but the other band edge q = 0 has the same |Ω - 2ω| detuning when Ω = 2ω̃. The limiting edge is therefore the one with the smaller effective modulation δ'(q)ω(q), which need not be q = π/a in a generic array. The paper notes that this holds 'for the range of parameters used here' but the general design prescription should state that both edges (or the entire zone) must be checked, or give a condition under which q = π/a is limiting. Otherwise Eq. (17) may give an incorrect threshold when the other edge is more restrictive.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix B / Fig. 3 caption] The caption of Fig. 3(a) says the static parameters are borrowed from the orange system in Fig. 2(a), while Sec. III A and Fig. 4 refer to the 'green band' of Fig. 3(b). Please make the parameter-set naming consistent across figures and text.
  2. [Data availability] The Data Availability statement says the implementation will be made available 'upon reasonable request'. For reproducibility, a permanent code/data repository would be preferable.
  3. [Sec. III A / Eq. (24)] The wave-packet gain calculation uses the Floquet growth rate at the carrier wavevector only. The paper notes the need for uniformity of Im μ over the packet, but a quantitative condition on the packet width σ_q relative to the curvature of Im μ would make the fidelity claim more precise.
  4. [General] The mechanism is demonstrated on a single discrete mechanical model. A brief numerical example on a different platform, such as a coupled-resonator optical waveguide or Josephson-junction array, would strengthen the 'generic' claim, though it is not essential to the central derivation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the band-wide resonance conditions are derived from static eigenmodes and modulation fields, then checked against independent Floquet integration; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. Starting from the static Bloch eigenproblem (Eq. 9), the modulation matrix elements V_αβ are computed from static eigenvectors (Eq. 12), and the standing-wave resonance condition follows from a two-mode reduction to coupled Mathieu equations (Eq. 19), with the Floquet frequency and threshold given by Eqs. (20)-(22). The predicted thresholds are then compared against numerical Floquet-Bloch integration (Appendix C) with no free parameters fit to the target quantities; the collapse in Figs. 2(d) and 3(d) tests the theory rather than re-inserting it. Self-citations (Refs. 14, 15, 22, 24) supply a numerical method, a membrane-resonator model, and standard symmetry facts, but the load-bearing band-wide resonance result does not reduce to those citations. The main weakness—the assumption that the target band is 'gapped from other bands' (Sec. II B 2) with no quantitative gap criterion—limits the demonstrated generality, especially since the random tests use k2 ≫ k1, but this is a validity/correctness limitation, not a circularity of the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters of the discrete model (k1, k2, τ, κ) are static input parameters from the prior membrane model, not fitted to the amplification results; they are sampled over ranges to test the theory. The modulation strength δ and frequency Ω are control parameters, not fitted constants. The main assumptions are standard Floquet/Mathieu theory and the physical modeling assumptions about isolated bands and cosine-like dispersion.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Floquet theory and the standard Mathieu equation stability results apply to the reduced equations.
    Used in Sec. II A-C and Appendix E; results from Refs. 21 and 23 are assumed for the single-oscillator Mathieu equation and its Floquet exponent.
  • domain assumption The target band is isolated from all other bands so that only the resonant pair of static modes participates.
    Sec. II B 2 states 'Our goal is to single out a band that is gapped from other bands'; Eq. 12 truncates to a single pair of coupled Mathieu equations, neglecting interband couplings to other bands.
  • domain assumption The static dispersion of a 1D coupled-resonator array is dominated by a cosine Fourier component, with higher harmonics small enough to be overcome by moderate modulation strength.
    Sec. II D: 'cos(qa) is often the dominant Fourier component ... In these cases, the band is detuned from perfect resonance at some wavevectors ... threshold value that increases with the level of detuning.' If higher harmonics are large, the required δ may exceed the stability bound.
  • domain assumption The modulation preserves instantaneous local stability: K0 ± K1 is positive semidefinite and 0 ≤ δ ≤ 1.
    Sec. II B 2 imposes |(K1)ij| ≤ |(K0)ij| and 0 ≤ δ ≤ 1, which bounds V11 and ensures physical stability of the time-varying system.
  • domain assumption Lossless dynamics are assumed; losses are stated to attenuate amplification but not change resonance conditions.
    Footnote 25 and the dissipation note in Sec. IV; the calculations are for conservative systems, with losses only discussed qualitatively.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Full-band reciprocal parametric amplification in coupled oscillator arrays." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I3VMSQXL

@misc{pith2026260716539,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Full-band reciprocal parametric amplification in coupled oscillator arrays},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I3VMSQXL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16539}
}
read the original abstract

Parametric resonance provides a versatile mechanism to manipulate wave signals in time-modulated metamaterials, but typically operates within narrow wavelength or frequency ranges. Here, we show that one-dimensional arrays of coupled resonators can generically exhibit parametric amplification across an entire band under standing-wave parametric modulation. We develop a general physical framework to describe the parametric resonance of isolated bands, derive modulation conditions needed to achieve band-wide amplification for a given band, and demonstrate their validity in a model of active mechanical metamaterials based on tunable membrane resonator arrays. We numerically demonstrate applications of the proposed strategy in distortion-free amplification and temporal splitting of wave packets, with results in quantitative agreement with our theoretical calculations. Our strategies for broadband amplification can be generalized to other active wave media with nearly flat or cosine-like dispersion relations, with potential applications in loss-mitigation, noise squeezing, and programmable wave manipulation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16539 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Abstract model: An array of oscillators with arbitrary couplings between them, periodic in space with unit cells [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Flat amplified bands from uniform modulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Fully amplified band with finite bandwidth us [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Wave packet dynamics in amplified bands. (a) (top) Fully amplified flat band. Static parameters are the same as the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Temporal wave packet splitting. (a) Displacement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Floquet-Bloch dispersion relations To generate dispersion relations for excitations of the periodic lattice, we first Fourier transform in space, writ- ing uj(t)∝ X q eiqaj uq(t),(5) 4 whereais the periodicity of the lattice in space andqis the wavevector. We then arrive at the equation of motion for eachq: d2uq dt2 +K(q, t)uq(t) = 0,(6) where K(q, t) = X...

  2. [2]

    To start, we assume that the modu- lation has the same minimal unit as the static system; we will relax this assumption later on

    Projection onto static bands We now restrict ourselves to modulations of the form K(q, t) =K0(q) +δcos(Ωt)K 1(q); (8) i.e., we start with a static system with dynamical matrix K0 and introduce sinusoidal modulations of couplings at a frequency Ω with modulation strength set by an over- all parameterδ. To start, we assume that the modu- lation has the same...

  3. [3]

    Wang, Y.-Z

    Y.-F. Wang, Y.-Z. Wang, B. Wu, W. Chen, and Y.-S. Wang, Tunable and Active Phononic Crystals and Metamaterials, Applied Mechanics Reviews72, 10.1115/1.4046222 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4046222 2020

  4. [4]

    Uniform modulation For the uniform modulation, the unit cell remains the same as in the static system, so the stiffness matrices are 2×2 matrices given by K(−1) 0 = κ−c 0 0 ,K (0) 0 = α−c −c d , K(1) 0 = κ0 −c0 ,K 1 = k1 0 0k 2 . (B5)

  5. [5]

    Standing-wave modulation with two-unit supercell In the case of a standing-wave modulation, the unit cell is doubled. Eq. (B3) remains the same, but the stiffness matrices are now 4×4 matrices given by K(−1) 0 =   0 0κ−c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   ,K (0) 0 =   α−c κ0 −c d−c0 κ−c α−c 0 0−c d   , K(1) 0 =   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 κ0 0 0 −c0 0 0   ...

  6. [6]

    Louisell,Coupled mode and parametric electronics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1960)

    W. Louisell,Coupled mode and parametric electronics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1960)

    1960

  7. [7]

    Zangeneh-Nejad and R

    F. Zangeneh-Nejad and R. Fleury, Active times for acous- tic metamaterials, Reviews in Physics4, 100031 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Trainiti, Y

    G. Trainiti, Y. Xia, J. Marconi, G. Cazzulani, A. Er- turk, and M. Ruzzene, Time-Periodic Stiffness Modula- tion in Elastic Metamaterials for Selective Wave Filter- ing: Theory and Experiment, Physical Review Letters 122, 124301 (2019)

    2019

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    S. Yin, E. Galiffi, and A. Al` u, Floquet metamaterials, eLight2, 8 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    D. L. Sounas and A. Al` u, Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation, Nature Photonics11, 774 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Nassar, B

    H. Nassar, B. Yousefzadeh, R. Fleury, M. Ruzzene, A. Al` u, C. Daraio, A. N. Norris, G. Huang, and M. R. Haberman, Nonreciprocity in acoustic and elastic mate- rials, Nature Reviews Materials , 1 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    T. T. Koutserimpas, A. Al` u, and R. Fleury, Para- metric amplification and bidirectional invisibility in $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric time-Floquet systems, Physical Review A97, 013839 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Galiffi, P

    E. Galiffi, P. A. Huidobro, and J. B. Pendry, Broadband Nonreciprocal Amplification in Luminal Metamaterials, Physical Review Letters123, 206101 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Aumentado, Superconducting Parametric Amplifiers: The State of the Art in Josephson Parametric Amplifiers, IEEE Microwave Magazine21, 45 (2020)

    J. Aumentado, Superconducting Parametric Amplifiers: The State of the Art in Josephson Parametric Amplifiers, IEEE Microwave Magazine21, 45 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    B. L. Kim, C. Chong, S. Hajarolasvadi, Y. Wang, and C. Daraio, Dynamics of time-modulated, nonlinear phononic lattices, Physical Review E107, 034211 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    E. S. Cassedy and A. A. Oliner, Dispersion relations in time-space periodic media: Part I—Stable interactions, Proceedings of the IEEE51, 1342 (1963)

    1963

  9. [17]

    E. S. Cassedy, Dispersion relations in time-space periodic media part II—Unstable interactions, Proceedings of the IEEE55, 1154 (1967)

    1967

  10. [18]

    Yakubovich, V

    V. Yakubovich, V. Starzhinskii, and G. Schmidt,On Linear Differential Equations with Periodic Coefficients, Vol. 1 (Wiley, London, 1976)

    1976

  11. [19]

    Kruss and J

    N. Kruss and J. Paulose, Nondispersive One-Way Signal Amplification in Sonic Metamaterials, Physical Review Applied17, 024020 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Karki and J

    P. Karki and J. Paulose, Stopping and reversing sound via dynamic dispersion tuning in a phononic metamate- rial, Phys. Rev. Applied15, 034083 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Yariv, Y

    A. Yariv, Y. Xu, R. K. Lee, and A. Scherer, Coupled- resonator optical waveguide: a proposal and analysis, 16 Optics letters24, 711 (1999)

    1999

  14. [22]

    Hutter, E

    C. Hutter, E. A. Thol´ en, K. Stannigel, J. Lidmar, and D. B. Haviland, Josephson junction transmission lines as tunable artificial crystals, Physical Review B83, 014511 (2011)

    2011

  15. [23]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz,Mechanics, 3rd ed., Vol. 1 (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1976)

    1976

  16. [24]

    N. W. McLachlan,Theory and application of Mathieu functions(Oxford University Press, 1947)

    1947

  17. [25]

    A. H. Nayfeh and D. T. Mook,Nonlinear oscillations (John Wiley & Sons, 2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Kovacic, R

    I. Kovacic, R. Rand, and S. Mohamed Sah, Mathieu’s Equation and Its Generalizations: Overview of Stability Charts and Their Features, Applied Mechanics Reviews 70, 10.1115/1.4039144 (2018)

    2018 doi

  19. [27]

    Karki and J

    P. Karki and J. Paulose, Non-singular and singular flat bands in tunable phononic metamaterials, Physical Re- view Research5, 023036 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, The Floquet Engineer’s Handbook (2020), arXiv:2003.08252 [cond-mat]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Melkani and J

    A. Melkani and J. Paulose, Space-time symmetry and nonreciprocal parametric resonance in mechanical sys- tems, Physical Review E110, 015003 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Losses can be incorporated by adding terms that are first-order in time; these generically have the effect of attenuating the strength of the amplification but do not significantly change the resonance conditions [14, 55]

  23. [31]

    G´ omez-Le´ on and G

    a. G´ omez-Le´ on and G. Platero, Floquet-Bloch theory and topology in periodically driven lattices, Physical Review Letters110, 1 (2013), arXiv:1303.4369

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Holthaus, Floquet engineering with quasienergy bands of periodically driven optical lattices, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 013001 (2015)

    M. Holthaus, Floquet engineering with quasienergy bands of periodically driven optical lattices, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 013001 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Moussa, G

    H. Moussa, G. Xu, S. Yin, E. Galiffi, Y. Ra’di, and A. Al` u, Observation of temporal reflection and broad- band frequency translation at photonic time interfaces, Nature Physics19, 863 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Salerno, T

    G. Salerno, T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, and I. Carusotto, Flo- quet topological system based on frequency-modulated classical coupled harmonic oscillators, Physical Review B93, 085105 (2016), arXiv:1510.04697

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    J. Vila, R. K. Pal, M. Ruzzene, and G. Trainiti, A Bloch- based procedure for dispersion analysis of lattices with periodic time-varying properties, Journal of Sound and Vibration406, 363 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Lellouch, M

    S. Lellouch, M. Bukov, E. Demler, and N. Goldman, Parametric Instability Rates in Periodically Driven Band Systems, Physical Review X7, 021015 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    Y. Xiao, D. N. Maywar, and G. P. Agrawal, Reflection and transmission of electromagnetic waves at a temporal boundary, Optics Letters39, 574 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    J. P. Mathew, R. N. Patel, A. Borah, R. Vijay, and M. M. Deshmukh, Dynamical strong coupling and parametric amplification of mechanical modes of graphene drums, Nature Nanotechnology11, 747 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    B. L. Kim, C. Chong, and C. Daraio, Temporal Refrac- tion in an Acoustic Phononic Lattice, Physical Review Letters133, 077201 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    J. T. Mendon¸ ca, Time refraction and spacetime optics, Symmetry16, 1548 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    S. Wang, N. Shao, H. Chen, J. Chen, H. Qian, Q. Wu, H. Duan, A. Al´ u, and G. Huang, Experimental real- ization of temporal refraction and reflection in elastic beams, Nature Communications16, 9520 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Y. Ye, C. Liu, A. Marzani, E. Riva, X. Wang, and A. Palermo, Nonreciprocal scattering of elastic waves at time interfaces induced by spatiotemporal modulation, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing240, 113346 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Y. Wang, B. Yousefzadeh, H. Chen, H. Nassar, G. Huang, and C. Daraio, Observation of Nonreciprocal Wave Prop- agation in a Dynamic Phononic Lattice, Physical Review Letters121, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.194301 (2018)

    2018 doi

  36. [44]

    Blaikie, D

    A. Blaikie, D. Miller, and B. J. Alem´ an, A fast and sensitive room-temperature graphene nanomechanical bolometer, Nature Communications10, 1 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Miller, A

    D. Miller, A. Blaikie, and B. J. Alem´ an, Nonvolatile Rewritable Frequency Tuning of a Nanoelectromechani- cal Resonator Using Photoinduced Doping, Nano Letters 20, 2378 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Carter, U

    B. Carter, U. F. Hernandez, D. J. Miller, A. Blaikie, V. R. Horowitz, and B. J. Alem´ an, Coupled Nanomechanical Graphene Resonators: A Promising Platform for Scalable NEMS Networks, Micromachines14, 2103 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Cha and C

    J. Cha and C. Daraio, Electrical tuning of elastic wave propagation in nanomechanical lattices at MHz frequen- cies, Nature Nanotechnology13, 1016 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    Lifshitz and M

    R. Lifshitz and M. C. Cross, Response of parametrically driven nonlinear coupled oscillators with application to micromechanical and nanomechanical resonator arrays, Physical Review B67, 134302 (2003)

    2003

  41. [49]

    O’Brien, C

    K. O’Brien, C. Macklin, I. Siddiqi, and X. Zhang, Reso- nant Phase Matching of Josephson Junction Traveling Wave Parametric Amplifiers, Physical Review Letters 113, 157001 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    M. Shi, V. Ribeiro, and A. M. Perego, Parametric am- plification in coupled nonlinear waveguides: The role of coupling dispersion, Frontiers in PhotonicsV olume 4 - 2023, 10.3389/fphot.2023.1051294 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Cerullo and S

    G. Cerullo and S. De Silvestri, Ultrafast optical para- metric amplifiers, Review of scientific instruments74, 1 (2003)

    2003

  44. [52]

    Esposito, A

    M. Esposito, A. Ranadive, L. Planat, and N. Roch, Per- spective on traveling wave microwave parametric ampli- fiers, Applied Physics Letters119, 120501 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and Z. H. Musslimani, Beam Dynamics in pt Symmetric Opti- cal Lattices, Physical Review Letters100, 103904 (2008)

    2008

  46. [54]

    Lifshitz and M

    R. Lifshitz and M. C. Cross, Nonlinear Dynamics of Nanomechanical and Micromechanical Resonators, inRe- views of Nonlinear Dynamics and Complexity, edited by H. G. Schuster (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2008) pp. 1–52

    2008

  47. [55]

    Rugar and P

    D. Rugar and P. Gr¨ utter, Mechanical parametric ampli- fication and thermomechanical noise squeezing, Physical Review Letters67, 699 (1991)

    1991

  48. [56]

    Delory, C

    A. Delory, C. Prada, M. Lanoy, A. Eddi, M. Fink, and F. Lemoult, Elastic Wave Packets Crossing a Space-Time Interface, Physical Review Letters133, 267201 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    M. M. Samak and O. R. Bilal, Direct Observation of All- Flat Bands Phononic Metamaterials, Physical Review Letters133, 266101 (2024)

    2024

  50. [59]

    N., Haberman M

    Nassar H., Chen H., Norris A. N., Haberman M. R., and Huang G. L., Non-reciprocal wave propagation in mod- 17 ulated elastic metamaterials, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences473, 20170188 (2017)

    2017

  51. [60]

    Melkani, Degeneracies and symmetry breaking in pseudo-Hermitian matrices, Physical Review Research5, 023035 (2023)

    A. Melkani, Degeneracies and symmetry breaking in pseudo-Hermitian matrices, Physical Review Research5, 023035 (2023)

    2023

  52. [61]

    M. E. Tuckerman,Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Molecular Simulation(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010)

    2010

  53. [4000]

    (b) Same as (a) but with Ωt 2 = 585

    time points. (b) Same as (a) but with Ωt 2 = 585. (c) Transmission and reflection coefficients as a function of the duration of the modulation pulse Ω(t 2 −t 1). Symbols are simulation results and solid lines are the prediction from Eq. (25). narrow-band techniques that target...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.