Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 37 references

Collapsing-tube type II blow-up for the energy-supercritical heat equation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For n≥5, the cubic heat equation admits a new type II blow-up: a shrinking tube that collapses to a point.

desk verdict A serious construction that likely gives the first positive type II blow-up in the Matano–Merle range via a collapsing-tube mechanism; the main theorem is plausible, but the constant that fixes the logarithmic rate is asserted rather than derived in the text. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16733 v1 pith:PPM55GSD submitted 2026-07-18 math.AP

Manuel del Pino , Monica Musso , Juncheng Wei , Yifu Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35B4435K5835K20
keywords typeIIblow-upenergy-supercriticalheatequationcollapsingtubeAubin–TalentibubbleaxisymmetrickernelnonlocalmodulationshrinkingsphereMatano–Merlerange
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs the first positive, single-point type II blow-up for the energy-supercritical heat equation $u_t = \Delta u + u^3$ in dimensions $n \ge 5$. The solution concentrates along an $(n-4)$-dimensional sphere whose radius shrinks at the parabolic scale $\sqrt{T-t}$, while the transverse thickness of the tube is far smaller, of order $(T-t)/|\log(T-t)|^{n/(n-2)}$. This is a two-scale mechanism: a critical four-dimensional Aubin–Talenti bubble sits in the transverse direction while the concentration set itself collapses. The logarithmic rate is forced by a nonlocal modulation equation coupling the bubble to the axisymmetric heat kernel. If the construction is correct, it is the first type II blow-up that quantifies a self-similar collapsing-tube geometry, in a regime where positive radial type II blow-up is impossible.

What carries the argument

The central object is the corrected approximate solution $u_* = U_{\lambda,\xi} + \Psi_0 + \Psi_1$, where $U_{\lambda,\xi}$ is a four-dimensional Aubin–Talenti bubble $U(y)=2\sqrt{2}/(1+|y|^2)$ centered at $(\xi_r(t),0)$, and $\Psi_0$ solves a heat equation whose source is the bubble's slowly decaying error, represented through the axisymmetric Hankel–Fourier heat kernel. The scaling parameter $\lambda(t)$ obeys a nonlocal integro-differential equation, effectively $C\left( \int_0^{t-(T-t)} \frac{\dot{\lambda}(s)}{t-s} ds + \frac{n-2}{2} \int_{t-(T-t)}^{t-\lambda^2(t)} \frac{\dot{\lambda}(s)}{t-s} ds \right) = -c + o(1)$; the coefficient $(n-2)/2$ comes from the large-argument asymptotics of a modified Bessel function in the intermediate time regime. An inner–outer gluing scheme with a refined re-gluing

What would settle it

Carry out explicitly the constant computation in Appendix B.2: if the ratio $C_4/C_2$ is not $(n-2)/2$, or if the sum of the drift term and the first-error projection on mode 0 in Section 7.2 actually vanishes, then the claimed logarithmic law and the theorem as stated break down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that for any $n \ge 5$, in $\mathbb{R}^n$ or in suitable symmetric bounded domains, there exist initial and boundary data for which the positive solution of $u_t = \Delta u + u^3$ blows up exactly at time $T$ and only at the origin, through a thin tube around a shrinking sphere. In cylindrical coordinates $(r,z)$, the leading profile is $(1/\lambda(t))U((r - \xi_r(t), z)/\lambda(t))$, where $U$ is the Aubin–Talenti bubble in $\mathbb{R}^4$, the sphere radius satisfies $\xi_r(t) \sim \sqrt{2(n-4)(T-t)}$, and the transverse scale satisfies $\lambda(t) \sim \kappa_* (T-t)/|\log(T-t)|^{n/(n-2)}$. The symmetry class reduces the problem to a four-dimensional critical equation with drift $(n-4)/r \, u_r$, so the ambient dimension enters through the drift and the outer

Load-bearing premise

The theorem's logarithmic rate depends on a specific constant, $((n-2)/2)$, obtained in the appendix from the ratio $C_4/C_2$ of two Bessel-regime computations; that calculation is summarized rather than fully displayed, and the companion claim in Section 7.2 that a certain mode-0 projection does not vanish is asserted with details omitted, so a different constant would change the logarithmic exponent and invalidate the theorem as stated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Positive type II single-point blow-up exists for the cubic heat equation in all n ≥ 5, including dimensions 5–12 where positive radial type II blow-up is excluded.
  • The singular set is not fixed: the concentration set is a sphere that collapses at the parabolic scale, producing a two-scale singularity with transverse thickness much smaller than the sphere radius.
  • The blow-up law contains a logarithmic factor with dimension-dependent exponent n/(n−2), distinct from the standard critical four-dimensional one-logarithm law.
  • A fixed-radius variant of the construction recovers the usual critical logarithmic rate, connecting the collapsing-tube mechanism to known critical bubble phenomena.
  • The paper's formal modulation table predicts companion rates for transverse bubbles of other dimensions: T−t for k=3, (T−t)^2 for k=5, exponential for k=6, and algebraic for k>6.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The explicit √(T−t) inward motion of the concentration sphere gives a rigorous scalar-parabolic template for two-scale collapsing-ring scenarios seen numerically in fluid models; the underlying mechanisms differ, but the radial law may be a generic geometric feature.
  • The dimension-dependent logarithmic exponent is testable numerically in n=5: one should see λ(t)(T−t)^{-1}|log(T−t)|^{5/3} converge to a constant κ_*, and any different limit would signal an error in the Bessel-constant computation.
  • The same construction likely extends to critical bubbles of other transverse dimensions k, and the paper's formal rates offer a concrete roadmap for existence proofs in those cases.
  • The solution is built inside a high-dimensional symmetry class; a natural open question the paper leaves implicit is whether the collapsing-tube singularity is stable under perturbations that break the symmetry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a new Type II finite-time blow-up mechanism for the energy-supercritical heat equation u_t = Δu + u^3 in dimensions n ≥ 5. The solution is positive, blows up only at the origin, and concentrates near a shrinking (n−4)-dimensional sphere. In cylindrical coordinates, the leading profile is a 4D Aubin–Talenti bubble centered at radius ξ_r(t) ~ √(2(n−4)(T−t)), with transverse scale λ(t) ~ κ_* (T−t)/|log(T−t)|^{n/(n−2)}. The proof uses an inner–outer gluing scheme with a nonlocal correction Ψ0 built from the axisymmetric heat kernel, leading to a nonlocal modulation equation for λ. The paper claims this is the first positive Type II blow-up in the sub-Joseph–Lundgren regime for the cubic heat equation.

Significance. If the construction is correct, the result is significant: it provides the first rigorous example of Type II blow-up via a collapsing-tube geometry in the energy-supercritical heat equation, combining a critical 4D bubble with a self-similarly shrinking concentration set. The two-scale mechanism and the explicit logarithmic law are novel and clearly explained. The paper follows an established strategy for this group (inner–outer gluing, mode decomposition, renormalization), and several parts—such as the mode-by-mode construction of the inner solution in Section 6 and the detailed estimates for the outer problem in Appendix A—are carefully presented. The central quantitative claim, however, depends on a constant ratio in the nonlocal term that is not fully computed, and the manuscript explicitly omits details at two load-bearing points. The paper should therefore be revised to make the core rate verification fully checkable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B.2, Eq. (4.4)] The logarithmic exponent in Theorem 1.1 is determined by c_n^* = (n−2)/2, which is the ratio C4/C2 computed at the end of Appendix B.2. This computation is not displayed: the paper states 'the computation of the constants above gives C4/C2 = (n−2)/2' after summarizing the two integrals. Moreover, the displayed evaluation of the angular integral in region I assumes 'For A_n ≤ 1', but by definition A_n = c_n√((T−s)/(t−s)) ≥ c_n > 1 for all s in that region. The derivation of C2 as written is therefore not justified; either the formula contains a typo or the regime is misidentified. Since any change in this ratio would change the exponent n/(n−2), the full calculation must be provided and corrected.
  2. [Section 7.2, Eq. (7.10) and subsequent paragraph] The text asserts that the mode-0 projection of the drift term together with the first error 'does not vanish' and that this can be handled by 'slightly modifying the first correction Ψ0', with details omitted. This modification feeds into the nonlocal term in the scaling equation (7.27) and could affect the constants that determine the blow-up rate. The claim is load-bearing and should be substantiated with the actual computation and the explicit modified Ψ0; otherwise the derivation of the reduced equation is incomplete.
  3. [Section 5, Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3] The proofs of Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3 are omitted with the remark 'The proofs of Lemma 5.2 and Lemma 5.3 are similar to these carried out above.' These lemmas are essential for Proposition 5.1, the linear estimate for the outer problem used throughout the fixed-point argument. The weights ϱ2 and ϱ3 are structurally different from ϱ1, and the time-singularity and Hölder estimates are not immediate adaptations of Lemma 5.1. Please include the proofs or a detailed derivation of the estimates.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] The title of the arXiv version shows a spacing artifact ('HEA T EQUA TION'); please proofread the title and abstract for formatting.
  2. [Section 7.3.2] The statement that 'λ(t) is assumed to be defined for negative t' is a technical device for the nonlocal equation; a brief explanation of how the fixed-point arguments handle the extension to negative times would improve readability.
  3. [Section 4.1] The notation λ_∗(t) is introduced with a specific constant involving |log T|^{2/(n−2)}; in the abstract and Theorem 1.1 the rate is stated with an unspecified positive constant κ_*. The relation between the two is clear from Section 7.5, but a sentence at first occurrence would help.
  4. [Equation (4.3)] In the displayed formula for Ψ0, the inner integral over R^3 exp(−|z−˜z|^2/(4(t−s))) d˜z is dimensionally a factor (4π(t−s))^{3/2}; simplifying this before the Bessel analysis in Appendix B.2 would make the subsequent estimates easier to follow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the blow-up rate and collapsing-sphere law are derived from a fixed-point construction and orthogonality conditions, not fitted to a target; imported prior results are independent published theorems.

full rationale

The central claim is an existence construction: the parameter functions λ(t) and ξ_r(t) are not fitted to a prescribed blow-up profile, but are determined by the orthogonality conditions (4.1)–(4.2) and solved via the Schauder fixed-point argument in Section 7.7. The leading-order λ_*(t) displayed in Section 2 is an ansatz that is later derived from the nonlocal reduced equation (4.6); this is a self-consistency derivation rather than a circular reduction of a prediction to an input. Likewise, ξ_{r,*}(t)=sqrt(2(n−4)(T−t)) follows from the explicit modulation equation ˙ξ_r + (n−4)/ξ_r = o(1), independently of the desired conclusion. The coefficient c_n^*=(n−2)/2 controlling the logarithmic exponent is computed in Appendix B.2 from the two Bessel asymptotics in (4.5); the computation is summarized as 'the computation of the constants above gives C4/C2=(n−2)/2' rather than fully displayed, and Section 7.2 also asserts with omitted details that the mode-0 projection of the drift term and the first error 'do not vanish,' requiring a modified Ψ0. These are missing verification steps and correctness risks, but they are not instances in which a claimed prediction reduces by construction to an input or to a fitted parameter. Finally, Proposition 7.1 is imported from [12] (Dávila–del Pino–Wei), a published theorem by overlapping authors; it is used as a black-box solvability statement for the same type of nonlocal integral equation and is independently checkable, so its use does not make the argument circular. No self-definitional, fitted-input-called-prediction, uniqueness-imported, or ansatz-smuggled step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data fitting: κ_* and a_* are free data of the constructed solution, not fitted constants. The main new analytic content is the Bessel-based memory expansion (4.4), whose constants are partly asserted. The paper imports two external results ([12, Prop 7.1], [10, Sec 7]) from the same group; those are prior published theorems, so the borrowing is not circular, but they are un-reproduced assumptions in this text.

free parameters (2)
  • κ_* = unspecified >0; fixed by a_* = Z*_0(q)+ψ(q,0) via κ_* = -c0 a_*/(c_n^* C)
    Free amplitude of the transverse bubble. The theorem asserts existence for some κ_*>0, not a predicted universal constant; it depends on the chosen initial/boundary data.
  • a_* = <0, chosen by initial data
    Encodes the initial/boundary data through Z*_0(q)+ψ(q,0), entering the modulation equation (4.6). It is a free datum of the construction, not fitted to external measurements.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Non-degeneracy and spectral properties of L0 = Δ + 3U^2: kernel spanned by Z_i (i=1..5), positive eigenvalue μ0 with eigenfunction Z0 decaying like |y|^{-3/2}e^{-√μ0|y|}
    Invoked in Section 6 for the linear inner problem and (2.1)-(2.2); standard consequence of the Yamabe-problem linearization.
  • standard math Bessel-function asymptotics (4.5): I_ν(z)∼(z/2)^ν/Γ(ν+1) for z→0 and ∼e^z/√(2πz) for z→∞
    Used to split the time integral in Appendix B.2 into the regimes I, J, K; classical.
  • standard math Axisymmetric heat kernel representation (B.2) with modified Bessel function I_{(n-5)/2}
    Derived in Appendix B.1 via Hankel-Fourier transform; used to represent Ψ0 in (4.3).
  • domain assumption Proposition 7.1 (inverse operator P for B0) and its estimates, taken from [12]
    Section 7.3.2 states 'The proof of Proposition 7.1 is in [12]'. The fixed point construction for λ depends on this external theorem. It is published, but not reproved here.
  • domain assumption Higher-mode inner estimates and the inner-outer gluing estimates of [10, Section 7]
    Section 6: Proposition 6.3 'can be carried out similar to that of [10, Section 7]', and the higher-mode estimate (6.36) 'follows from [10, Section 7]'.
  • ad hoc to paper Constant ratio C4/C2 = (n−2)/2 in the memory term (4.4)
    Appendix B.2: 'The computation of the constants above gives C4/C2=(n−2)/2.' The computation is not fully displayed; the log-exponent n/(n−2) rests on it.
  • ad hoc to paper Nonvanishing of the sum of the mode-0 drift projection (7.10) and the first error E0; resolvable by modifying Ψ0
    Section 7.2: 'direct computations show that the sum of these two terms does not vanish... Here we omit the details.' Load-bearing for the choice of correction Ψ0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Collapsing-tube type II blow-up for the energy-supercritical heat equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PPM55GSD

@misc{pith2026260716733,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Collapsing-tube type II blow-up for the energy-supercritical heat equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PPM55GSD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16733}
}
abstract

We construct a new type II finite-time blow-up mechanism for the energy-supercritical heat equation \[ u_t=\Delta u+u^3, \qquad n\geq 5. \] The solution is positive and blows up only at the origin, but in a highly anisotropic fashion. As $t\nearrow T$, the solution concentrates in a thin tubular region around an $(n-4)$-dimensional sphere whose radius shrinks to zero at the self-similar scale \[ \xi_r(t)\sim \sqrt{2(n-4)(T-t)}. \] At the same time, concentration takes place transversely to the sphere at the much smaller scale \[ \lambda(t)\sim \kappa_* \frac{T-t}{|\log(T-t)|^{\frac n{n-2}}}, \] for some $\kappa_*>0$. More precisely, in cylindrical coordinates $r=|x'|$, $z\in\mathbb R^3$, the leading profile is \[ u(x,t) \sim \frac{1}{\lambda(t)} U\left( \frac{r-\xi_r(t)}{\lambda(t)}, \frac{z}{\lambda(t)} \right), \] where $U$ is the Aubin--Talenti bubble in $\mathbb R^4$. The construction reveals a two-scale singularity mechanism in which a critical transverse bubble concentrates around a geometric set that itself collapses. The concentration tube evolves at the parabolic scale $\sqrt{T-t}$, whereas its transverse thickness is governed by the much smaller type II scale $\lambda(t)$. The logarithmic blow-up law is determined by a nonlocal modulation equation arising from the interaction between the four-dimensional critical bubble and the axisymmetric heat kernel. To our knowledge, this seems to be the first Type II blowup that quantifies the effect of a self-similar collapsing tube. The exponent $p=3$ is energy-supercritical in dimensions $n\geq5$, but lies below the Joseph--Lundgren exponent for $5\leq n\leq 12$, in a regime where positive radial type II blow-up is ruled out. The present result provides the first example of a positive type II, single-point blow-up through a collapsing thin-tube geometry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16733 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A schematic depiction of the evolution of the “thin tube” in Theorem 1.1 for n = 5. In this case, the concentration set is a shrinking circle. For 0 < t1 < t2 < T, the concentration set evolves from the picture on the left to the picture on the right, and finally collapses to a point as t ↗ T. The construction is related to earlier examples of type II blow-up along positive-dimensional sets. In the energy-supercriti… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    S. Aryan. Soliton resolution for the energy-critical nonlinear heat equation in the radial case. To appear inAnalysis & PDE

  2. [2]

    Existence of finite time blow-up in Keller- Segel system.Ann

    Federico Buseghin, Juan D´ avila, Manuel del Pino, and Monica Musso. Existence of finite time blow-up in Keller- Segel system.Ann. PDE, 12(1):Paper No. 17, 144, 2026

    2026

  3. [3]

    Finite-time blow-up for the three dimensional axially symmetric Keller-Segel system.J

    Federico Buseghin, Juan D´ avila, Manuel del Pino, and Monica Musso. Finite-time blow-up for the three dimensional axially symmetric Keller-Segel system.J. Funct. Anal., 290(12):Paper No. 111443, 57, 2026

    2026

  4. [4]

    Remark on Luo-Hou’s ansatz for a self-similar solution to the 3D Euler equations

    Dongho Chae and Tai-Peng Tsai. Remark on Luo-Hou’s ansatz for a self-similar solution to the 3D Euler equations. Nonlinearity, 27(8):1933–1941, 2014

    1933

  5. [5]

    Nonradial type II blow up for the energy-supercritical semilinear heat equation.Anal

    Charles Collot. Nonradial type II blow up for the energy-supercritical semilinear heat equation.Anal. PDE, 10(1):127–252, 2017

    2017

  6. [6]

    Refined description and stability for singular solutions of the 2D Keller-Segel system.Comm

    Charles Collot, Tej-Eddine Ghoul, Nader Masmoudi, and Van Tien Nguyen. Refined description and stability for singular solutions of the 2D Keller-Segel system.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 75(7):1419–1516, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Collapsing-ring blowup solutions for the Keller-Segel system in three dimensions and higher.J

    Charles Collot, Tej-Eddine Ghoul, Nader Masmoudi, and Van Tien Nguyen. Collapsing-ring blowup solutions for the Keller-Segel system in three dimensions and higher.J. Funct. Anal.285 (2023), no. 7, Paper No. 110065, 41 pp

    2023

  8. [8]

    Dynamics near the ground state for the energy critical nonlinear heat equation in large dimensions.Comm

    Charles Collot, Frank Merle, and Pierre Rapha¨ el. Dynamics near the ground state for the energy critical nonlinear heat equation in large dimensions.Comm. Math. Phys., 352(1):215–285, 2017

    2017

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Strongly anisotropic type II blow up at an isolated point.J

    Charles Collot, Frank Merle, and Pierre Rapha¨ el. Strongly anisotropic type II blow up at an isolated point.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 33(2):527–607, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Green’s function and infinite-time bubbling in the critical nonlinear heat equation.J

    Carmen Cort´ azar, Manuel del Pino, and Monica Musso. Green’s function and infinite-time bubbling in the critical nonlinear heat equation.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 22(1):283–344, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Existence and stability of infinite time blow-up in the Keller-Segel system.Arch

    Juan D´ avila, Manuel del Pino, Jean Dolbeault, Monica Musso, and Juncheng Wei. Existence and stability of infinite time blow-up in the Keller-Segel system.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 248(4):Paper No. 61, 154, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Singularity formation for the two-dimensional harmonic map flow intoS 2.Invent

    Juan D´ avila, Manuel del Pino, and Juncheng Wei. Singularity formation for the two-dimensional harmonic map flow intoS 2.Invent. Math., 219(2):345–466, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Type II Blow-up in the 5-dimensional Energy Critical Heat Equation.Acta Math

    Manuel del Pino, Monica Musso, and Juncheng Wei. Type II Blow-up in the 5-dimensional Energy Critical Heat Equation.Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.), 35(6):1027–1042, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    Geometry driven type II higher dimensional blow-up for the critical heat equation.J

    Manuel del Pino, Monica Musso, and Juncheng Wei. Geometry driven type II higher dimensional blow-up for the critical heat equation.J. Funct. Anal., 280(1):108788, 49, 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    Type II finite time blow-up for the energy critical heat equation inR 4.Discrete Contin

    Manuel del Pino, Monica Musso, Juncheng Wei, and Yifu Zhou. Type II finite time blow-up for the energy critical heat equation inR 4.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 40(6):3327–3355, 2020. COLLAPSING-TUBE BLOW-UP 53

    2020

  8. [16]

    Herrero, and Juan J

    Stathis Filippas, Miguel A. Herrero, and Juan J. L. Vel´ azquez. Fast blow-up mechanisms for sign-changing solutions of a semilinear parabolic equation with critical nonlinearity.R. Soc. Lond. Proc. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 456(2004):2957–2982, 2000

    2004

  9. [17]

    On the blowing up of solutions of the Cauchy problem foru t = ∆u+u 1+α.J

    Hiroshi Fujita. On the blowing up of solutions of the Cauchy problem foru t = ∆u+u 1+α.J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. I, 13:109–124 (1966), 1966

    1966

  10. [18]

    Yoshikazu Giga and Robert V. Kohn. Characterizing blowup using similarity variables.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 36(1):1–40, 1987

    1987

  11. [19]

    Blow up rate for semilinear heat equations with subcritical nonlinearity.Indiana Univ

    Yoshikazu Giga, Shin’ya Matsui, and Satoshi Sasayama. Blow up rate for semilinear heat equations with subcritical nonlinearity.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 53(2):483–514, 2004

    2004

  12. [20]

    On blow-up rate for sign-changing solutions in a convex domain.Math

    Yoshikazu Giga, Shin’ya Matsui, and Satoshi Sasayama. On blow-up rate for sign-changing solutions in a convex domain.Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 27(15):1771–1782, 2004

    2004

  13. [21]

    A type II blowup for the six dimensional energy critical heat equation.Ann

    Junichi Harada. A type II blowup for the six dimensional energy critical heat equation.Ann. PDE, 6(2):Paper No. 13, 63, 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Herrero and Juan J

    Miguel A. Herrero and Juan J. L. Vel´ azquez. Explosion de solutions d’´ equations paraboliques semilin´ eaires super- critiques.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math., 319(2):141–145, 1994

    1994

  15. [23]

    A blow up result for semilinear heat equations in the supercritical case

    Miguel A Herrero and Juan JL Vel´ azquez. A blow up result for semilinear heat equations in the supercritical case. preprint, 1992

    1992

  16. [24]

    Hou and De Huang

    Thomas Y. Hou and De Huang. Potential singularity formation of incompressible axisymmetric Euler equations with degenerate viscosity coefficients.Physica D, 435:133257, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Thomas Y. Hou. Nearly self-similar blowup of generalized axisymmetric Navier–Stokes and Boussinesq equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10916, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    On classification of global dynamics for energy-critical equivariant harmonic map heat flows and radial nonlinear heat equation.Comm

    Kihyun Kim and Frank Merle. On classification of global dynamics for energy-critical equivariant harmonic map heat flows and radial nonlinear heat equation.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 78(9):1783–1842, 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    On nonexistence of type II blowup for a supercritical nonlinear heat equation

    Hiroshi Matano and Frank Merle. On nonexistence of type II blowup for a supercritical nonlinear heat equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 57(11):1494–1541, 2004

    2004

  20. [28]

    Classification of type I and type II behaviors for a supercritical nonlinear heat equation.J

    Hiroshi Matano and Frank Merle. Classification of type I and type II behaviors for a supercritical nonlinear heat equation.J. Funct. Anal., 256(4):992–1064, 2009

    2009

  21. [29]

    Stability of the blow-up profile for equations of the typeu t = ∆u+|u| p−1u.Duke Math

    Frank Merle and Hatem Zaag. Stability of the blow-up profile for equations of the typeu t = ∆u+|u| p−1u.Duke Math. J., 86(1):143–195, 1997

    1997

  22. [30]

    Boundedness of global solutions for a supercritical semilinear heat equation and its application

    Noriko Mizoguchi. Boundedness of global solutions for a supercritical semilinear heat equation and its application. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 54(4):1047–1059, 2005

    2005

  23. [31]

    Nonexistence of type II blowup solution for a semilinear heat equation.J

    Noriko Mizoguchi. Nonexistence of type II blowup solution for a semilinear heat equation.J. Differential Equations, 250(1):26–32, 2011

    2011

  24. [32]

    Bubbling blow-up in critical elliptic and parabolic problems.Notices Amer

    Monica Musso. Bubbling blow-up in critical elliptic and parabolic problems.Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 69(10):1700– 1706, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Optimal Liouville theorems for superlinear parabolic problems.Duke Math

    Pavol Quittner. Optimal Liouville theorems for superlinear parabolic problems.Duke Math. J., 170(6):1113–1136, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Birkh¨ auser Advanced Texts: Basler Lehrb¨ ucher

    Pavol Quittner and Philippe Souplet.Superlinear parabolic problems. Birkh¨ auser Advanced Texts: Basler Lehrb¨ ucher. [Birkh¨ auser Advanced Texts: Basel Textbooks]. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, 2019. Blow-up, global existence and steady states, Second edition of [ MR2346798]

    2019

  27. [35]

    Type II blow-up for the four dimensional energy critical semi linear heat equation.J

    R´ emi Schweyer. Type II blow-up for the four dimensional energy critical semi linear heat equation.J. Funct. Anal., 263(12):3922–3983, 2012

    2012

  28. [36]

    Finite time blowup for Lagrangian modifications of the three-dimensional Euler equation.Ann

    Terence Tao. Finite time blowup for Lagrangian modifications of the three-dimensional Euler equation.Ann. PDE, 2(2):Art. 9, 79, 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    Refined blowup analysis and nonexistence of type II blowups for an energy critical nonlinear heat equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.07186, 2021

    Kelei Wang and Juncheng Wei. Refined blowup analysis and nonexistence of type II blowups for an energy critical nonlinear heat equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.07186, 2021. Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom Email address:md...

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.