Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Sharp weighted Carleman and Huber isoperimetric inequalities on the unit ball in higher dimensions

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes a new family of sharp weighted Carleman inequalities on the unit ball in every dimension and, in even dimensions, a sharp weighted Huber isoperimetric inequality with an explicit constant and full classification of eq

desk verdict The limiting construction and Huber proof are promising, but the weight function I is defined inconsistently in the main theorem versus the proofs, so the paper is not acceptable as-is. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18782 v1 pith:7PZG3J6T submitted 2026-07-21 math.DG

Zhijie Chen , Changfeng Gui , Shihong Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DG MSC 35A2335B0653C2131B10
keywords weightedCarlemaninequalityHuberisoperimetrichyperbolicharmonicextensionconformallyinvariantboundaryoperatorsQ-curvaturemovingspheremethodBergmanspacesharpconstant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives a weighted exponential (Carleman-type) inequality from a limiting argument applied to sharp polynomial inequalities, and shows the resulting inequality is conformally invariant despite a nontrivial weight. It classifies all extremal functions in L-infinity, which turn out to be the standard conformal bubbles. In even dimensions it promotes this to a sharp weighted Huber isoperimetric inequality under an integral bound on the positive part of the polyharmonic operator (-Delta)^{n/2}F, with an explicit sharp constant and equality attained only by a hyperbolic harmonic bubble plus a Green-function term. This generalizes Huber's classical two-dimensional result and provides a sharp counterpart to earlier Q-curvature isoperimetric inequalities in higher dimensions.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on a limiting procedure: for t tending to 0, parameters (a,b) are chosen so that the exponents p_t and q_t of the sharp polynomial inequality (1.6) both diverge while q_t/p_t converges to the prescribed ratio, and the normalized kernel Q_{a,b}(1) converges to the weight dnu built from the hypergeometric function I. The resulting exponential inequality is then shown to be conformally invariant through the Poisson-kernel action on log bubbles. Extremal classification uses the moving-sphere method on the upper half-space, relying on the Kelvin transformation and a regularity theorem proving that extremals are C^1. For the Huber inequality, Boggio's Green function G_n and the

What would settle it

Construct a function F in H_f with gamma < (2sigma-1)k_n for which ||e^F||_{L^{n/(2sigma-1)}(dnu)} > M_{sigma,beta;I,J_m} ||e^f||_{L^{n-1}(S^{n-1},dmu)}; or exhibit an extremal function in L-infinity(S^{n-1}) not of the form log((1-|a|^2)/|eta-a|^2)+c; or verify that the sharp constant's radial integral diverges for some beta<n. The paper's own Lemma 5.5 supplies a violating function outside H_f, so the natural test is to search inside H_f.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.3: for n=2m, if F lies in the space H_f where the conformally invariant boundary operators B_j^{2m-1}F vanish for j=1,...,m-1, and the total mass gamma of the positive part of (-Delta)^m F is below (2sigma-1)k_n, then the L^{n/(2sigma-1)} norm of e^F with the weight dnu is bounded by the L^{n-1} norm of e^f on the boundary, with the explicit constant M_{sigma,beta;I,J_m}. The inequality is sharp; equality in the enlarged singular class is exactly F_{a,c}=P(f_{a,c})+gamma G_n(.,a). The proof passes through a weighted Carleman inequality (Theorem 1.1) obtained as a two-parameter limit p,q going to infinity, whose extremals are classified by the moving-sphere meth

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that F lies in H_f, meaning the higher-order conformally invariant boundary operators B_j^{2m-1} vanish for j=1,...,m-1; if even one such operator is nonzero, the inequality can fail, as the paper's Lemma 5.5 shows for F=1-|xi|^2 in n=4.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the sharp weighted Carleman inequality (1.8) holds in all dimensions with full L-infinity extremal classification: the extremals are exactly the conformal bubbles.
  • For n=2 it implies and is equivalent to the Bergman-space embedding ||F||_{A^p_alpha} <= ||F||_{H^p}, generalizing Burbea's contractive inequality.
  • In even dimensions it yields a sharp weighted Huber isoperimetric inequality with an explicit constant, and equality cases are exactly P(f_{a,c}) + gamma G_n(.,a).
  • The conformal invariance extends the inequality to any domain conformally equivalent to the unit ball; for n=2 this gives a generalized Huber inequality on simply connected planar domains with a conformal-radius weight.
  • The result supplies sharp counterparts to Q-curvature isoperimetric inequalities in higher dimensions, with explicit constants and extremal functions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The weight dnu for odd n or sigma different from 1 has no known geometric interpretation; it may correspond to some conformal density or fractional Q-curvature object that is yet to be identified.
  • The H_f boundary condition, while necessary for the proof, might be replaceable by a more geometric condition such as vanishing of higher-order mean curvatures for adapted metrics; exploring this could extend the result to broader classes of manifolds.
  • The two-parameter limiting mechanism used here could be applied to other families of sharp polynomial inequalities to generate new exponential inequalities with explicit weights and extremal classifications.
  • The n=2 equivalence with Bergman-space norms hints at possible higher-dimensional analogues for weighted Bergman-type spaces on the ball.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives sharp weighted exponential (Carleman-type) inequalities on the unit ball in all dimensions by taking a two-parameter limit of Gluck's sharp extension inequalities, with the constants obtained in closed form. Theorem 1.1 states that for n≥2 and σ in the stated range, the hyperbolic harmonic extension P(f) satisfies an L^{n/(2σ−1)}(dν) inequality with an explicit weight dν, and all L^∞ extremals are classified as the standard conformal bubbles. In n=2 this is connected to a Bergman-space norm inequality. In even dimensions, Theorem 1.3 proves a sharp weighted Huber-type isoperimetric inequality for functions in the space H_f whose higher-order conformally invariant boundary operators vanish, with an explicit sharp constant M and a singular extremal family F_{a,c}. The proof uses Boggio's Green function, a Jensen/Chebyshev argument, conformal invariance, and a moving-sphere classification, with a regularity appendix for the extremal equation.

Significance. If the inconsistency in the definition of I discussed below is resolved, this is a strong paper: it converts a known sharp polynomial inequality into a genuinely sharp exponential inequality with explicit constants, gives the first full extremal classification in this family, proves a nontrivial conformal invariance for the weighted inequality, and obtains a sharp higher-dimensional Huber inequality with singular extremals. The use of Gluck's theorem as the starting point is legitimate and not circular; the constants are computed, not fitted. The Huber result is honestly restricted to the space H_f, and Lemma 5.5 shows this restriction is necessary, so the scope limitation is explicit rather than hidden. The Bergman-space application for n=2 is also attractive. The main obstruction to acceptance is the inconsistency in the weight function I, which enters the statements of the main theorems.

major comments (2)
  1. [§1.1, Theorem 1.1; §2, (2.9)–(2.10); §3.1, Lemma 3.1; Remark 1.2] The definition of I is internally inconsistent: Theorem 1.1 and (2.9) define I(x)=Σ (1−n/2)_k (n/2)_k x^k/(2k), but the series calculation immediately before (2.10) gives (1/2) (1−n/2)_k / (n/2)_k x^k/k, since (n/2)_k is the hypergeometric denominator. The displayed (2.10) incorrectly removes this denominator. For n=4, the printed I equals −r², whereas the correct quotient equals −r²/4, exactly as Remark 1.2 asserts. With the printed I, Lemma 3.1 would imply ∫_{S³} log(1−2a·η+r²)=2r²+O(r⁴), contradicting the elementary expansion r²/2+O(r⁴). Since I enters dν in Theorem 1.1, the conformal-invariance identity (3.5), cσ in Lemma 3.3, and M in Theorem 1.3, the inequality as printed is not the one actually proved. The quotient form appears to be used elsewhere in the paper, e.g. in Remark 2.1's Stirling estimate. This must be corrected consistently throughout the statements and proofs.
  2. [§4.2, Theorem 1.2 and Introduction] The abstract and introduction state that, for n=2, the Carleman inequality is 'equivalent' to the Bergman-space norm inequality, but the proof of Theorem 1.2 only derives the Bergman inequality from Theorem 1.1. The converse is elementary (write F=e^{P(f)+iP^⊥(f)} for f=log|F| on the boundary), but it is not stated. Since the equivalence is a advertised claim, please add the reverse implication or explicitly say that only one direction is proved.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2, Remark 2.1] Remark 2.1's convergence/stirling argument for I(1) already uses the quotient definition of I. After correcting the definition, this remark should be updated so that it agrees with the notation in Theorems 1.1 and 2.1.
  2. [§2, proof of Theorem 2.1] The phrase 'Theorem B 1' appears; it should be 'Theorem B'.
  3. [§4.2, proof of Theorem 1.2] The passage from the weighted integral inequality to the A^{pα}_α norm would be clearer if the normalization factor π/(α−1) were displayed consistently in the displayed formula; currently the reader has to infer it from the preceding definition.
  4. [§5.1, Lemma 5.3] The recursive definition of the polynomials p_j is quite dense. A brief indication that the recursion is obtained by differentiating (5.8) at r=1, or a pointer to the display (5.13), would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main inequalities are obtained by an explicit limiting computation from Gluck's external sharp inequality, with the only self-citation being a checkable explicit formula.

full rationale

The derivation chain is essentially non-circular. Theorem 1.1 is obtained by taking a two-parameter limit of Gluck's sharp polynomial inequality (1.6), an external result, and the limiting weight dν and constants are computed in closed form rather than fitted to the target inequality. The only author-overlapping citation used in this derivation is Lemma 2.1, credited to [25,43], which is an explicit hypergeometric evaluation of Q_{a,b}(1); it is parameter-free, independently checkable, and does not assert the Carleman/Huber inequality itself, so under the stated rules it is genuine supporting evidence rather than a circularity. The Huber inequality (Theorem 1.3) is then derived from the Green representation on the space H_f, Jensen's inequality, a rearrangement inequality, and the previously established weighted Carleman bound; the restriction to H_f is an explicitly stated, essential hypothesis, and Lemma 5.5 confirms it cannot be removed. Equality statements are obtained via the standard moving-sphere classification of Y.Y. Li, not from the inequality being proved. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction and no theorem is justified solely by a self-citation. I note, however, a separate correctness concern: the printed definition of I in Theorem 1.1/(2.10) appears algebraically inconsistent with Lemma 3.1 and Remark 1.2 for the Pochhammer ratio; that is a mathematical error or typo, not a circularity, and it is not counted in the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

No fitted parameters appear in the paper: the sharp constants are explicit integrals or closed-form expressions. The main load-bearing inputs are Gluck's theorem, Boggio's formula, and Case's boundary operators, all from the literature. The invented weight I and the space H_f are precisely defined and come with independent checks (adapted-metric limit for n=4, counterexample for H_f).

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Gluck's sharp inequality (1.6) for the operator Q_{a,b} in the full parameter range (Theorem B).
    The entire limiting argument in Section 2 starts from this published theorem; if it had a hidden gap, Theorems 1.1 and 1.3 would not follow.
  • standard math Hypergeometric identities (2.3)-(2.4) and the derivative evaluation (2.10).
    Used to compute Q_{a,b}(1) and to define the weight I; standard formulas from Gradshteyn-Ryzhik.
  • standard math Boggio's formula for the Green function of (-Delta)^m on the unit ball (5.5).
    The Huber inequality relies on the Green representation formula F = P(f) + G_n * (-Delta)^m F.
  • domain assumption Case's conformally invariant boundary operators and their explicit form B_j^{2m-1} = partial_nu^j - T_j(u|_{S^{n-1}}) on the ball (5.11).
    Defines the space H_f that makes the higher-dimensional Huber inequality well-posed; the assumption is essential (Lemma 5.5).
  • domain assumption The integrability condition gamma < (2sigma-1)k_n, equivalently beta < n.
    Guarantees the sharp constant M_{sigma,beta;I,J_m} is finite; the endpoint is excluded in Remark 1.3.
  • standard math Y.Y. Li's classification lemma for conformal transformations on R^{n-1} (Lemma 4.6).
    Used at the final step of the moving-sphere classification to identify all extremal functions.
invented entities (2)
  • Weight function I(|xi|^2) and measure dnu independent evidence
    purpose: To make the Carleman inequality conformally invariant and to interpolate between hyperbolic and Bergman geometries; for even n and sigma=1 it reproduces the adapted metric of Ache-Chang.
    I is defined by an explicit convergent series (derivative of a hypergeometric function); in n=4 and sigma=1 it equals -|xi|^2/4, matching known geometry; for even n the series terminates.
  • Space H_f and boundary operators B_j^{2m-1} independent evidence
    purpose: To formulate a well-posed higher-dimensional Huber inequality; the theorem fails outside this class.
    The operators are derived from Case's boundary operators and admit explicit formulas (5.11); the necessity of H_f is demonstrated by the counterexample in Lemma 5.5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sharp weighted Carleman and Huber isoperimetric inequalities on the unit ball in higher dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7PZG3J6T

@misc{pith2026260718782,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sharp weighted Carleman and Huber isoperimetric inequalities on the unit ball in higher dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7PZG3J6T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18782}
}
abstract

In this paper, using a limiting approach, we establish a new type of weighted Carleman inequality in all dimensions $n\geq 2$ and classify all extremal functions. In particular, when $n=2$, we prove that our inequality is equivalent to a sharp norm inequality in the Bergman space. In even dimensions, we further establish a sharp weighted Huber isoperimetric inequality on the unit ball, which generalizes Huber's original result \cite[Ann. Math., 1954]{Huber} and may be regarded as a sharp counterpart of Y. Wang's isoperimetric inequality in the unit ball \cite[Adv. Math., 2015]{Wang}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A. G. Ache and S.-Y . A. Chang. Sobolev trace inequalities of order four.Duke Math. J.166(14)(2017), 2719-2748

    2017

  2. [2]

    Abramowitz, I

    M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Reprint of the 1972 edition. Dover Publications, New York, 1992

    1972

  3. [3]

    Erd ´elyi, W

    A. Erd ´elyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, and F. G. Tricomi, Higher Transcendental Functions, V ols. I, II, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953

    1953

  4. [4]

    Bartolucci, C

    D. Bartolucci, C. Gui, A. Jevnikar, and A. Moradifam, A singular sphere covering inequality: uniqueness and symmetry of solutions to singular Liouville-type equations.Math. Ann.374(2019), no. 3-4, 1883–1922

    2019

  5. [5]

    Bartolucci and C

    D. Bartolucci and C. Lin, Existence and uniqueness for mean field equations on multiply connected domains at the critical parameter.Math. Ann.359(2014), no. 1-2, 1–44

    2014

  6. [6]

    Bartolucci and C

    D. Bartolucci and C. Lin, Uniqueness results for mean field equations with singular data.Comm. Partial Differential Equations34(2009), no. 7-9, 676–702

    2009

  7. [7]

    Beckner, Sharp Sobolev inequalities on the sphere and the Moser-Trudinger inequality.Ann

    W. Beckner, Sharp Sobolev inequalities on the sphere and the Moser-Trudinger inequality.Ann. of Math.(2), 138(1993), 213-242

    1993

  8. [8]

    Boggio, Sulle funzioni di Green d’ordinem.Rend

    T. Boggio, Sulle funzioni di Green d’ordinem.Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo,20, 97-135, 1905

    1905

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Burbea, Inequalities for reproducing kernel spaces.Illinois J

    J. Burbea, Inequalities for reproducing kernel spaces.Illinois J. Math.27(1983), no. 1, 130–137

    1983

  2. [10]

    Burbea, Sharp inequalities for holomorphic functions.Illinois J

    J. Burbea, Sharp inequalities for holomorphic functions.Illinois J. Math.31(1987), no. 2, 248–264

    1987

  3. [11]

    Burbea, Inequalities for holomorphic functions of several complex variables.Trans

    J. Burbea, Inequalities for holomorphic functions of several complex variables.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.276 (1983), no. 1, 247–266

    1983

  4. [12]

    Bayart, O

    F. Bayart, O. F. Brevig, A. Haimi, J. Ortega-Cerd `a, K.-M. Perfekt, Contractive inequalities for Bergman spaces and multiplicative Hankel forms.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.371(2019), no. 1, 681–707

    2019

  5. [13]

    Carleman, Zur Theorie der Minimalfl ¨achen.Math

    T. Carleman, Zur Theorie der Minimalfl ¨achen.Math. Z.9(1921) no. 1–2 154–60

    1921

  6. [14]

    Case, Boundary operators associated with the Paneitz operator.Indiana Univ

    J. Case, Boundary operators associated with the Paneitz operator.Indiana Univ. Math. J.67(2018), no. 1, 293–327

    2018

  7. [15]

    J. Case. Sharp weighted Sobolev trace inequalities and fractional powers of the Laplacian.J. Funct. Anal. 279(4)(2020), 108567

    2020

  8. [16]

    Case and W

    J. Case and W. Luo. Boundary operators associated with the sixth-order GJMS operator.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN,14(2021), 10600-10653

    2021

  9. [17]

    Chen, A new family of sharp conformally invariant integral inequalities.Int

    S. Chen, A new family of sharp conformally invariant integral inequalities.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN(2014), no. 5, 1205–1220

    2014

  10. [18]

    P. L. Duren, Theory ofH p spaces.Pure Appl. Math., V ol. 38 Academic Press, New York-London, 1970, xii+258 pp

    1970

  11. [19]

    Dolbeault, M

    J. Dolbeault, M. J. Esteban, A. Figalli, R. L. Frank, and M. Loss, Sharp stability for Sobolev and log-Sobolev inequalities, with optimal dimensional dependence,Camb. J. Math.13(2025), no. 2, 359–430

    2025

  12. [20]

    J. Dou, M. Zhu, Sharp Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality on the upper half space.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN(2015), no. 3, 651–687. 41

    2015

  13. [21]

    J. Dou, Q. Guo, M. Zhu, Subcritical approach to sharp Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev type inequalities on the upper half space.Adv. Math.312(2017), 1–45

    2017

  14. [22]

    Fiala, Le probl `eme des isop´erim`etres sur les surfaces ouvertes `a courbure positive.Comment

    F. Fiala, Le probl `eme des isop´erim`etres sur les surfaces ouvertes `a courbure positive.Comment. Math. Helv. 13(1940) 293-346

    1940

  15. [23]

    Gazzola, H

    F. Gazzola, H. Grunau and G. Sweers,Polyharmonic boundary value problems. Positivity preserving and non- linear higher order elliptic equations in bounded domains, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1991. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 2010. xviii+423 pp

    1991

  16. [24]

    Ghoussoub and C

    N. Ghoussoub and C. Lin, On the best constant in the Moser–Onofri–Aubin inequality.Commun. Math. Phys. 298(2010), (3), 869–878

    2010

  17. [25]

    R. Gong, Q. Yang, S. Zhang, A simple proof of reverse Sobolev inequalities on the sphere and Sobolev trace inequalities on the unit ball.J. Funct. Anal.290(2026), no. 9, 111380, 55pp

    2026

  18. [26]

    Gui and A

    C. Gui and A. Moradifam, The sphere covering inequality and its applications.Invent. Math.214(2018), no. 3, 1169–1204

    2018

  19. [27]

    I. S. Gradshteyn, L. M. Ryzhik, Table of integrals, series, and products. Translated from the Russian.Eighth edition. Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2015. xlvi+1133 pp

    2015

  20. [28]

    Gluck, Subcritical approach to conformally invariant extension operators on the upper half space.J

    M. Gluck, Subcritical approach to conformally invariant extension operators on the upper half space.J. Funct. Anal.278(2020), no. 1, 108082, 46 pp

    2020

  21. [29]

    F. Hang, X. Wang, X. Yan, Sharp integral inequalities for harmonic functions.Comm. Pure Appl. Math.61 (2008), no. 1, 54–95

    2008

  22. [30]

    F. Hang, X. Wang, X. Yan, An integral equation in conformal geometry.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar ´e C Anal. Non Lin´eaire26(2009), no. 1, 1–21

    2009

  23. [31]

    Huber, On subharmonic functions and differential geometry in the large.Comment

    A. Huber, On subharmonic functions and differential geometry in the large.Comment. Math. Helv.32(1957), 13–72

    1957

  24. [32]

    Huber, On the isoperimetric inequality on surfaces of variable Gaussian curvature.Ann

    A. Huber, On the isoperimetric inequality on surfaces of variable Gaussian curvature.Ann. Math. (2)60 237-247 (1954)

    1954

  25. [33]

    Papamichael and N

    N. Papamichael and N. Stylianopoulos, Numerical Conformal Mapping: Domain Decomposition and the Mapping of Quadrilaterals, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2010, xii+229 pp

    2010

  26. [34]

    Y . Y . Li, Remark on some conformally invariant integral equations: the method of moving spheres.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)6(2004), no. 2, 153-180

    2004

  27. [35]

    Li and J

    M. Li and J. Wei, Higher order Bol’s inequality and its applications. arXiv:2308.11388

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Rudin, Real and complex analysis

    W. Rudin, Real and complex analysis. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1987, xiv+416 pp. ISBN: 0-07- 054234-1

    1987

  29. [37]

    Schoen and S.-T.Yau, Lectures on differential geometry

    R. Schoen and S.-T.Yau, Lectures on differential geometry. Conf. Proc. Lecture Notes Geom. Topology, I International Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994, v+235 pp

    1994

  30. [38]

    Sire and Y

    Y . Sire and Y . Wang, Fractional Poincar´e inequality with finite total Q-curvature.Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ.56No. 2, Paper No. 35, 18 p. (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Bruno Pini

    Y . Sire and Y . Wang, Fractional Poincar´e inequalities in various settings. (English) “Bruno Pini” Mathemati- cal Analysis Seminar 2017. Papers from the seminar, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 2017. Bologna: Universit`a di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum. 43-54 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Tian, On a family of integral operators on the ball, arXiv:2110.11913

    W. Tian, On a family of integral operators on the ball, arXiv:2110.11913

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Wang, The isoperimetric inequality and Q-curvature.Adv

    Y . Wang, The isoperimetric inequality and Q-curvature.Adv. Math.281(2015), 823–844

    2015

  34. [42]

    Yang, Sharp Sobolev trace inequalities for higher order derivatives, arXiv:1901.03945

    Q. Yang, Sharp Sobolev trace inequalities for higher order derivatives, arXiv:1901.03945

    1901 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Yang and S

    Q. Yang and S. Zhang, Sharp quantitative integral inequalities for general conformally invariant extensions. arXiv:2603.06967

  36. [44]

    Zhang, The sharp type Chern-Gauss-Bonnet integral and asymptotic behavior.Adv

    S. Zhang, The sharp type Chern-Gauss-Bonnet integral and asymptotic behavior.Adv. Math.450(2024), Paper No. 109761, 36 pp

    2024

  37. [45]

    Zhu, Spaces of holomorphic functions in the unit ball

    K. Zhu, Spaces of holomorphic functions in the unit ball. Grad. Texts in Math., 226 Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005, x+271 pp. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Yau Mathematical Sciences Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Email:zjchen2016@tsinghua.edu.cn Department...

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.