Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 75 references

Two- and three-body bound states in one-dimensional Fermi bipolaron with three-body interaction

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two impurities in a one-dimensional Fermi gas with only three-body contact forces form a dimer bound state that is the ground state across almost the entire parameter space.

desk verdict New variational claim that a pure three-body contact force in a 1D Fermi gas yields a dimer and multiple trimers—plausible but the excited branches need convergence checks before I'd trust them. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20075 v1 pith:F344EZL3 submitted 2026-07-22 cond-mat.quant-gas

O. Hryhorchak , V. Pastukhov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas PACS 67.85.-d
keywords three-bodyinteractionFermibipolaronmedium-inducedboundstateone-dimensionalgasdimertrimervariationalmethodparticle-holeexcitation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies two impurities (bosonic, or spin-singlet fermions) immersed in a one-dimensional ideal Fermi gas where the only interaction is a three-body contact force involving both impurities and one host fermion. The authors derive an effective Hamiltonian that exactly removes the relative motion of the two impurities, turning the three-body interaction into a medium-induced effective attraction between the impurities' center of mass and the Fermi sea. Using variational trial states with at most one particle-hole excitation, they predict a dimer bound state of the two impurities that is the ground state for almost all couplings, plus several trimer bound states. Two of the trimer branches are purely collective: they exist only because of the Fermi sea, not in the vacuum three-body problem. If these predictions hold, one-dimensional Fermi gases with suppressed two-body interactions offer a clean setting for observing medium-induced few-body bound states.

What carries the argument

The key step is a reduction of the original three-body-contact model: by passing to center-of-mass and relative coordinates for the two impurities, the relative motion can be traced out exactly, producing an effective Hamiltonian in which two impurities move as a composite object interacting with the Fermi sea through an induced two-body potential. Variational wave functions with at most one particle-hole excitation then yield closed transcendental equations — Eq. (3.8) for the dimer and Eqs. (3.11)-(3.12) for the trimer — whose simultaneous solution determines the bound-state energies and the phase diagram.

What would settle it

A variational calculation retaining two particle-hole excitations for the trimer, or an exact-diagonalization/quantum Monte Carlo study of two impurities plus one fermion in a finite 1D Fermi sea, would settle whether the excited trimer branches survive and whether the dimer remains the ground state.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a one-dimensional Fermi gas with only a contact three-body interaction between two impurities and host fermions supports a wealth of medium-induced bound states. In particular, the medium-induced effective attraction between impurities always leads to a dimer bound state, and this dimer is energetically favored over the trimer almost everywhere in the coupling-versus-mass-ratio plane; only at extremely low density, near the pure three-body limit, does the trimer win. In addition, the variational equations yield several trimer branches beyond the vacuum-like one, and these excited trimers are collective in origin — they merge into the continuum at low density and hav

Load-bearing premise

The whole predicted trimer spectrum — especially the excited collective branches — rests on the assumption that restricting the variational Hilbert space to at most one particle-hole excitation is accurate, and the paper provides no convergence check against higher excitations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the dimer is indeed the ground state for almost all parameters, the low-energy physics of two impurities in this system is dominated by a medium-induced two-body bound state, not by single-fermion dressing.
  • The predicted dimer-trimer transition at extreme diluteness gives a concrete density-driven crossover that could be probed by varying the Fermi energy relative to the three-body binding energy.
  • The existence of purely collective excited trimer branches implies that the three-body contact interaction, which has no vacuum excited states, can produce an excited few-body spectrum when embedded in a Fermi sea.
  • The phase diagram in the (ln(|ε3|/εF), m/mI) plane gives a target for future numerical checks of the variational predictions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the one-particle-hole truncation is trusted, a natural next step is to compute the impurity spectral function or radio-frequency response to detect the dimer and trimer branches directly.
  • The same effective-Hamiltonian reduction may apply to higher dimensions or to more than two impurities, where the three-body force could stabilize clusters beyond trimers — a testable extension of the present variational scheme.
  • The reliance on a single-particle-hole ansatz suggests a direct falsifier: extending the trimer ansatz to two particle-hole excitations should preserve the two lowest trimer branches; if the excited branches shift significantly, they are truncation artifacts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper considers two impurities in a one-dimensional ideal Fermi gas interacting via a contact three-body interaction. The authors derive an effective Hamiltonian by projecting out the relative motion of the impurities (Eq. (2.6)), then apply a Chevy-type variational ansatz with up to one particle-hole excitation to compute dimer (Eq. (3.8)) and trimer (Eqs. (3.11)-(3.12)) bound-state energies. They report that a medium-induced dimer is the ground state for almost all couplings, and identify two excited trimer branches in addition to the vacuum-like trimer, claiming they are fully collective many-body effects.

Significance. If substantiated, the prediction of multiple collective trimer branches in a model with only three-body interactions would be a notable addition to the physics of low-dimensional quantum gases, where three-body forces are relevant. The variational framework is standard and the one-particle-hole ansatz has proved effective for Fermi polarons. However, the central new claim—excited trimer states—is not yet supported by convergence checks, and the effective-Hamiltonian derivation is too abbreviated. The paper therefore presents an interesting conjecture whose validation requires additional work.

major comments (4)
  1. [II.B, Eq. (2.6)] The effective Hamiltonian is introduced through the relation Heff - E ∝ Π^{-1}(E-H0) + g3,Λ n(Y), but the derivation that leads to this expression is not given. In particular, the meaning of the proportionality and the status of the energy-dependent operator Π^{-1}(E-H0) are unclear. Since every subsequent calculation uses this effective Hamiltonian, the authors must provide a precise derivation, stating the exact operator form and the conditions under which the reduction of the relative-motion subspace is exact.
  2. [III.B-C, Fig. 2] The existence of the two additional trimer branches is the main new result. These branches are obtained as solutions of the truncated variational equations (3.11)-(3.12) within the one-particle-hole ansatz. Unlike the lowest trimer, this ansatz does not provide an upper bound for these excited branches, and no convergence test with respect to including two-particle-hole excitations or a comparison with an independent method is reported. Given that the one-particle-hole truncation can generate spurious bound states in other polaron problems, the claim of 'several trimer states' is not yet established. The authors should demonstrate that the branches persist at higher truncation orders or provide an alternative justification.
  3. [III.A and III.C, Fig. 1] The text states that the dimer is always preferable over the trimer 'whose energy, calculated in the T-matrix approximation', and then notes that this T-matrix trimer does not properly account for particle-hole excitations. This creates an apparent inconsistency in the comparison. Although the figure also shows a one-particle-hole trimer, the discussion should be rephrased to make it clear that the dimer-trimer transition is assessed using consistent one-particle-hole calculations, with the T-matrix curve presented only as a benchmark.
  4. [III.C] Numerical details are insufficient for reproducibility: the grid for the inverse-momentum variable, the discretization of the integral equations, the convergence tolerances, and the error estimates are not given. For a paper reporting several bound-state branches that are sensitive to the solution of these equations, this information is essential.
minor comments (6)
  1. [III.C] The phrase 'standard numerical Python methods' should be replaced by a specific description of the algorithm (root finding, matrix inversion, etc.) and the numerical parameters used.
  2. [Eq. (3.9)] The notation Πkk′;q(E) has a formatting error: an extra parenthesis appears. Please correct.
  3. [Fig. 1 caption] 'The thing line represents the result' should be 'The thin line represents the result'.
  4. [Introduction, Sec. II.A] The text mentions 'two non-identical impurities' and 'different masses', but the Hamiltonian (2.1) uses a single mass m_I. Please clarify the mass structure; if the impurities are distinguishable but have equal mass, state this explicitly.
  5. [References] Reference [28] (X. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 193401 (2025)) appears to have an incorrect volume; please verify the citation.
  6. [Eq. (3.13)] The T-matrix trimer energy formula is stated without derivation or citation. Deriving it or providing a reference would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dimer/trimer energies are solutions of variational equations, not fitted; the only self-citation (Ref. [74]) is reproduced internally and is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from Hamiltonian (2.1) and the renormalization relation (2.2), which fixes the bare three-body coupling in terms of the vacuum binding energy epsilon_3. This is an input parameter, not a fitted output. The dimer equation (3.8) is derived in this paper from the trial state (3.7) by minimizing <D|H_eff|D> (Appendix A), so although Ref. [74] is a self-citation, the result is reproduced rather than imported. The trimer equations (3.11)-(3.12) come from a variational calculation with the ansatz (3.10); the energies are found as simultaneous solutions for given ln(|epsilon_3|/epsilon_F) and mass ratio, not adjusted to match a desired answer. The additional trimer branches in Fig. 2 are roots of the same equations, so they are not equivalent to the input by construction. The one-particle-hole truncation could in principle create spurious excited branches, but that is a convergence/correctness risk, not circularity: no fitted parameter or cited uniqueness theorem forces the result. The paper's self-citation is minor and not load-bearing, hence score 2 rather than 0, but there are no circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation has no data-fitted parameters: ε3 and εF set energy scales and m/mI is scanned. The main burden is carried by the model assumptions (three-body-only contact interaction) and the one-particle-hole variational truncation. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Only a three-body zero-range contact interaction between the two impurities and one host fermion is retained; all two-body interactions are fine-tuned to resonance or suppressed.
    Introduced in Sec. I and II.A; sets the model. If two-body channels cannot be fully suppressed, the predicted spectrum changes.
  • domain assumption The three-body interaction is fully characterized by the vacuum three-body binding energy ε3 through Eq. (2.2); no other three-body parameter survives the Λ→∞ limit.
    Eq. (2.2) is the standard renormalization of a contact three-body force. It assumes the shape of the smoothed δ_Λ is irrelevant in the limit.
  • ad hoc to paper The projection onto the relative-motion degree of freedom of the two impurities is exact, giving the energy-dependent effective Hamiltonian (2.6).
    Sec. II.B, Eqs. (2.4)-(2.6): the derivation is sketched with an unproven '∝' relation and does not rigorously show that the traced-out relative coordinate leaves an exactly local effective potential.
  • ad hoc to paper The Hilbert-space truncation to one particle-hole excitation (Chevy-type ansatz) is sufficient for the ground and low-lying bound states, including the claimed excited trimer branches.
    Sec. III, Eqs. (3.7) and (3.10). No convergence study with two-particle-hole states or comparison to exact/quantum Monte Carlo is provided.
  • standard math Thermodynamic limit with fixed density and translation invariance.
    Used throughout Sec. III to replace sums by integrals; standard in many-body theory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two- and three-body bound states in one-dimensional Fermi bipolaron with three-body interaction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F344EZL3

@misc{pith2026260720075,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two- and three-body bound states in one-dimensional Fermi bipolaron with three-body interaction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F344EZL3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20075}
}
read the original abstract

We discuss the ground-state properties of two bosonic (or spin-1/2 fermionic in a singlet spin state) impurities immersed in a one-dimensional ideal Fermi gas with only the three-body contact interaction accounted for. Despite its simplicity, the considered model is found to demonstrate a variety of medium-induced few-body bound states. Particularly, using variational calculations with trial wave functions that correctly take into account one particle-hole excitation, we predict the emergence of a dimer state and several trimer states over a wide range of the three-body coupling parameter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20075 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Energies of trimer (solid line) and dimer (dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Schirotzek, C.-H

    A. Schirotzek, C.-H. Wu, A. Sommer, and M. W. Zwier- lein,Observation of Fermi Polarons in a Tunable Fermi Liquid of Ultracold Atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 230402 (2009)

    2009

  2. [2]

    Massignan, M

    P. Massignan, M. Zaccanti and G. M. Bruun,Polarons, dressed molecules and itinerant ferromagnetism in ultra- cold Fermi gases.Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 034401 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    G. D. Mahan,Many-Particle Physics, (Springer New York, NY 2000.)

    2000

  4. [4]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga,Fesh- bach resonances in ultracold gases.Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1225 (2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    Kohstall, M

    C. Kohstall, M. Zaccanti, M. Jag, et al.Metastability and coherence of repulsive polarons in a strongly interacting Fermi mixture.Nature485, 615 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    Koschorreck, D

    M. Koschorreck, D. Pertot, E. Vogt et al.Attractive and repulsive Fermi polarons in two dimensions.Nature485, 619 (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    Scazza, G

    F. Scazza, G. Valtolina, P. Massignan, A. Recati, A. Am- ico, A. Burchianti, C. Fort, M. Inguscio, M. Zaccanti, 6 and G. Roati,Repulsive Fermi Polarons in a Resonant Mixture of Ultracold 6LiAtoms.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 083602 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    M. Punk, P. T. Dumitrescu, and W. Zwerger,Polaron-to- molecule transition in a strongly imbalanced Fermi gas. Phys. Rev. A80, 053605 (2009)

    2009

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    G. M. Bruun and P. Massignan,Decay of Polarons and Molecules in a Strongly Polarized Fermi Gas.Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 020403 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    M. M. Parish,Polaron-molecule transitions in a two- dimensional Fermi gas.Phys. Rev. A83, 051603(R) (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    Schmidt and T

    R. Schmidt and T. Enss,Excitation spectra and rf response near the polaron-to-molecule transition from the functional renormalization group.Phys. Rev. A83, 063620 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    Cui,Fermi polaron revisited: Polaron-molecule tran- sition and coexistence.Phys

    X. Cui,Fermi polaron revisited: Polaron-molecule tran- sition and coexistence.Phys. Rev. A102, 061301(R) (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    G. Ness, C. Shkedrov, Y. Florshaim, O. K. Diessel, Ori- ana K. J. von Milczewski, R. Schmidt, Y. Sagi,Observa- tion of a Smooth Polaron-Molecule Transition in a De- generate Fermi Gas.Phys. Rev. X10, 041019 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    M. M. Parish and J. Levinsen,Highly polarized Fermi gases in two dimensions.Phys. Rev. A87, 033616 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    R. Liu, X. Cui,Competing few-body correlations in ultra- cold Fermi polarons.AAPPS Bull.34, 29 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    J. B. McGuire,Interacting Fermions in One Dimension. I. Repulsive Potential.J. Math. Phys.6, 432 (1965)

    1965

  9. [17]

    J. B. McGuire,Interacting Fermions in One Dimension. II. Attractive Potential.J. Math. Phys.7, 123 (1966)

    1966

  10. [18]

    G. Orso, L. A. Bariˇ si´ c, E. Gradova, F. Chevy, and K. van Houcke,Quasiparticle residue and charge of the one- dimensional Fermi polaron.Phys. Rev. A113, 013310 (2026)

    2026

  11. [19]

    Schmidt, M

    R. Schmidt, M. Knap, D. A. Ivanov, J.-S. You, M. Cetina, and E. Demler,Universal many-body response of heavy impurities coupled to a Fermi sea: a review of recent progress.Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 024401 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Pilati and S

    S. Pilati and S. Giorgini,Phase Separation in a Polarized Fermi Gas at Zero Temperature.Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 030401 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    Prokof’ev and B

    N. Prokof’ev and B. Svistunov,Fermi-polaron problem: Diagrammatic Monte Carlo method for divergent sign- alternating series.Phys. Rev. B77, 020408(R) (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Van Houcke, F

    K. Van Houcke, F. Werner, and R. RossiHigh-precision numerical solution of the Fermi polaron problem and large-order behavior of its diagrammatic series.Phys. Rev. B101, 045134 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Chevy,Universal phase diagram of a strongly inter- acting Fermi gas with unbalanced spin populations.Phys

    F. Chevy,Universal phase diagram of a strongly inter- acting Fermi gas with unbalanced spin populations.Phys. Rev. A74, 063628 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    Combescot, A

    R. Combescot, A. Recati, C. Lobo, and F. Chevy,Normal State of Highly Polarized Fermi Gases: Simple Many- Body Approaches.Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 180402 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    Combescot and S

    R. Combescot and S. Giraud,Normal State of Highly Po- larized Fermi Gases: Full Many-Body Treatment.Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 050404 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    P. W. Anderson,Infrared Catastrophe in Fermi Gases with Local Scattering Potentials.Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 1049 (1967)

    1967

  19. [27]

    Kain and H

    B. Kain and H. Y. Ling,Hartree-Fock treatment of Fermi polarons using the Lee-Low-Pine transformation.Phys. Rev. A96, 033627 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    X. Chen, E. Dizer, E. R. Rodr ´ ıguez, and R. Schmidt, Mass-Gap Description of Heavy Impurities in Fermi Gases.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 193401 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    T. D. Lee, F. E. Low, and D. Pines,The Motion of Slow Electrons in a Polar Crystal.Phys. Rev.90, 297 (1953)

    1953

  22. [30]

    Pimenov, and M

    D. Pimenov, and M. Goldstein,Spectra of heavy polarons and molecules coupled to a Fermi sea.Phys. Rev. B98, 220302(R) (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    S. I. Mistakidis, G. C. Katsimiga, G. M. Koutentakis, and P. Schmelcher,Repulsive Fermi polarons and their in- duced interactions in binary mixtures of ultracold atoms. New J. Phys.21, 043032 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    T. Enss, B. Tran, M. Rautenberg, M. Gerken, E. Lippi, M. Drescher, B. Zhu, M. Weidem¨ uller, and M. Salmhofer, Scattering of two heavy Fermi polarons: Resonances and quasibound states.Phys. Rev. A102, 063321 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Tajima, J

    H. Tajima, J. Takahashi, S. I. Mistakidis, E. Nakano, and K. Iida,Polaron Problems in Ultracold Atoms: Role of a Fermi Sea across Different Spatial Dimensions and Quantum Fluctuations of a Bose Medium.Atoms9, 18 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Akamatsu, S

    Y. Akamatsu, S. Endo, K. Fujii, and M. HongoComplex- valued in-medium potential between heavy impurities in ultracold atoms.Phys. Rev. A110, 033304 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Baroni, Bo Huang, I

    C. Baroni, Bo Huang, I. Fritsche, E. Dobler, G. Anich, E. Kirilov, R. Grimm, M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, P. Massignan, and G. M. Bruun,Mediated interactions be- tween Fermi polarons and the role of impurity quantum statistics.Nat. Phys.20, 68 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Paredes, G

    R. Paredes, G. Bruun, and A. Camacho-Guardian,Inter- actions mediated by atoms, photons, electrons, and exci- tons.Phys. Rev. A110, 030101 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    H. Ando, G. Cai, C. Chin, T. Enss,Mediated interactions in mixtures of ultracold atoms.arXiv:2511.09745

  30. [38]

    Levinsen, F

    J. Levinsen, F. M. Marchetti, O. Bleu, M. M. Parish,Role of impurity statistics and medium constraints in polaron- polaron interactions.arXiv:2512.01413

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Nishida,Induced p-wave superfluidity in two dimen- sions: Brane world in cold atoms and nonrelativistic de- fect CFTs.Annals of Physics324, 897 (2009)

    Y. Nishida,Induced p-wave superfluidity in two dimen- sions: Brane world in cold atoms and nonrelativistic de- fect CFTs.Annals of Physics324, 897 (2009)

    2009

  32. [40]

    Giraud and R

    S. Giraud and R. CombescotInteraction between polarons and analogous effects in polarized Fermi gases.Phys. Rev. A85, 013605 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    F. F. Bellotti, T. Frederico, M. T. Yamashita, D. V. Fe- dorov, A. S. Jensen and N. T. Zinner,Three-body bound states of two bosonic impurities immersed in a Fermi sea in 2D.New J. Phys.18, 043023 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Huber, H.-W

    D. Huber, H.-W. Hammer, and A. G. Volosniev,In- medium bound states of two bosonic impurities in a one- dimensional Fermi gas.Phys. Rev. Research1, 033177 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Mukherjee, S

    K. Mukherjee, S. I. Mistakidis, S. Majumder, P. Schmelcher,Induced interactions and quench dynamics of bosonic impurities immersed in a Fermi sea.Phys. Rev. A102, 053317 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Statistical Physics: Theory and Computer Sim- ulations

    of clusters. The induced interaction stabilizes the for- mation of composite fermions in three-component Fermi systems [45, 46] and in Bose-Fermi mixtures [47–49] at a strong enough boson-fermion attraction. For low densi- ties of impurity atoms of both statistics, the univers...

    2026 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Guo and H

    Y. Guo and H. Tajima,Medium-induced bosonic clus- ters in a Bose-Fermi mixture: Toward simulating cluster formations in neutron-rich matter.Phys. Rev. A109, 013319 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Nishida,Polaronic Atom-Trimer Continuity in Three- Component Fermi Gases.Phys

    Y. Nishida,Polaronic Atom-Trimer Continuity in Three- Component Fermi Gases.Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 115302 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    Kirk and M

    T. Kirk and M. M. Parish,Three-body correlations in a two-dimensional SU(3) Fermi gas.Phys. Rev. A96, 7 053614 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    Hryhorchak and V

    O. Hryhorchak and V. Pastukhov,Second root of di- lute Bose-Fermi mixtures.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.56, 205003 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Pastukhov,Strongly interacting Bose-Fermi mixtures in4−ϵdimensions.Annals of Physics468, 169745 (2024)

    V. Pastukhov,Strongly interacting Bose-Fermi mixtures in4−ϵdimensions.Annals of Physics468, 169745 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Pisani, P

    L. Pisani, P. Bovini, F. Pavan, P. Pieri,Boson-fermion pairing and condensation in two-dimensional Bose-Fermi mixtures.SciPost Phys.18, 076 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    Scazza, M

    F. Scazza, M. Zaccanti, P. Massignan, M. M. Parish, and J. Levinsen,Repulsive Fermi and Bose Polarons in Quantum Gases.Atoms10, 55 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Mulkerin, Jia Wang, and Xia-Ji Liu, Attractive Fermi polarons at nonzero temperatures with a finite impurity concentration.Phys

    Hui Hu, Brendan C. Mulkerin, Jia Wang, and Xia-Ji Liu, Attractive Fermi polarons at nonzero temperatures with a finite impurity concentration.Phys. Rev. A98, 013626 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Tajima and S

    H. Tajima and S. Uchino,Many Fermi polarons at nonzero temperature.New J. Phys.20, 073048 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    Guijarro, A

    G. Guijarro, A. Pricoupenko, G. E. Astrakharchik, J. Boronat, and D. S. Petrov,One-dimensional three- boson problem with two- and three-body interactions. Phys. Rev. A97, 061605(R) (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Nishida,Universal bound states of one-dimensional bosons with two- and three-body attractions.Phys

    Y. Nishida,Universal bound states of one-dimensional bosons with two- and three-body attractions.Phys. Rev. A97, 061603(R) (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Valiente,Three-body repulsive forces among identi- cal bosons in one dimension.Phys

    M. Valiente,Three-body repulsive forces among identi- cal bosons in one dimension.Phys. Rev. A100, 013614 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    J. R. McKenney and J. E. Drut,Fermi-Fermi crossover in the ground state of one-dimensional few-body systems with anomalous three-body interactions.Phys. Rev. A99, 013615 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Sekino and Y

    Y. Sekino and Y. Nishida,Field-theoretical aspects of one-dimensional Bose and Fermi gases with contact in- teractions.Phys. Rev. A103, 043307 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Hryhorchak, V

    O. Hryhorchak, V. Pastukhov,Efimov-like physics in fraction-dimensional Bose systems with three-body inter- action.Eur. Phys. J. A58, 215 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Polkanov and V

    V. Polkanov and V. Pastukhov,Universalp-wave tetramers in low-dimensional fermionic systems with three-body interaction.Phys. Rev. A109, 043322 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Polkanov, O

    V. Polkanov, O. Hryhorchak, and V. Pastukhov,Four- body physics in low-dimensional bosons with three-body interaction.Annals of Physics491, 170536 (2026)

    2026

  54. [62]

    Sekino and Y

    Y. Sekino and Y. Nishida,Quantum droplet of one- dimensional bosons with a three-body attraction.Phys. Rev. A97, 011602(R) (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    Pastukhov,Ground-state properties of dilute one- dimensional Bose gas with three-body repulsion.Phys

    V. Pastukhov,Ground-state properties of dilute one- dimensional Bose gas with three-body repulsion.Phys. Lett. A383, 894 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    Maki and C

    J. Maki and C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez,Virial expansion for a three-component Fermi gas in one dimension: The quan- tum anomaly correspondence.Phys. Rev. A100, 063604 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    A. J. Czejdo, J. E. Drut, Y. Hou, J. R. McKenney, and K. J. Morrell,Virial coefficients of trapped and untrapped three-component fermions with three-body forces in ar- bitrary spatial dimensions.Phys. Rev. A101, 063630 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    J. R. McKenney, A. Jose, and J. E. Drut,Thermodynam- ics and static response of anomalous one-dimensional fermions via a quantum Monte Carlo approach in the worldline representation.Phys. Rev. A102, 023313 (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    Akagami, H

    S. Akagami, H. Tajima, and K. Iida,Condensation of Cooper triples.Phys. Rev. A104, L041302 (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    Morera, B

    I. Morera, B. Julia-Diaz, M. Valiente,Universality of quantum liquids and droplets in one dimension.Phys. Rev. Research4, L042024 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    Tajima, S

    H. Tajima, S. Tsutsui, T. M. Doi, and K. Iida,Cooper triples in attractive three-component fermions: Implica- tion for hadron-quark crossover.Phys. Rev. Research4, L012021 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    Tajima, K

    H. Tajima, K. Iida, T. Kojo, H. Liang,Tripling Fluc- tuations and Peaked Sound Speed in Fermionic Matter. Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 042701 (2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    Polkanov and V

    V. Polkanov and V. Pastukhov,Finite-temperature prop- erties of low-dimensional bosons with three-body interac- tion.arXiv:2604.04114

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    J. E. Drut, J. R. McKenney, W. S. Daza, C. L. Lin, and C. R. Ord´ o˜ nez,Quantum Anomaly and Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Fermions with Three-Body Interac- tions.Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 243002 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Valiente and V

    M. Valiente and V. Pastukhov,Anomalous frequency shifts in a one-dimensional trapped Bose gas.Phys. Rev. A99, 053607 (2019)

    2019

  66. [74]

    Tajima, K

    H. Tajima, K. Iida, and H. Liang,Nonrelativistic trace anomaly and equation of state in dense fermionic matter. Phys. Rev. C109, 055203 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    Hryhorchak, G

    O. Hryhorchak, G. Panochko, and V. Pastukhov,Bipo- laron in one-dimensional fermions with three-body inter- action.Annals of Physics484, 170296 (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.