Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 minor 40 references

Pinned nonempty interior and volumes of simplices

T0 review · 0 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For every fixed pair of points in a big enough fractal set, the volumes of k-simplices they span with further points fill a real interval.

desk verdict Genuinely new simplex-volume thresholds via a clean cylinder estimate plus projection reduction; the paper is solid and the flagged Lemma 5.1 gap is not real. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20416 v1 pith:SRHEOLEW submitted 2026-07-22 math.CA

Eyvindur Ari Palsson , Georgios Psaromiligkos This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CA MSC 28A7528A8042B20
keywords pinnedconfigurationsetsnonemptyinteriorsimplexvolumesHausdorffdimensiongeneralizedRadontransformstriangleareasprojectiontheoremsFalconer-typeproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a doubly strongly pinned nonempty-interior theorem: if a compact set $E$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$ has Hausdorff dimension above $\frac{d+k-1}{2}$, then no matter which two distinct points $x_0$ and $y$ of $E$ you choose in advance, the numbers $\left| (y-x_0) \wedge (x_1-x_0) \wedge \cdots \wedge (x_{k-1}-x_0) \right|$ obtained from further points $x_i \in E$ contain an open interval. The result is new because both pins are prescribed before the configuration is chosen, not selected after the fact. The proof works by reducing every $k$-volume to a triangle area: fixing one vector projects the remaining wedge onto the perpendicular hyperplane, and a cylinder-averaging estimate shows pinned triangle areas already have nonempty interior at dimension $\frac{d+1}{2}$. The same mechanism upgrades pinned scalar configuration sets (generalized distances, dot products, bilinear forms) from positive measure to nonempty interior at dimension $\frac{d+2}{2}$.

What carries the argument

The cylinder-averaging estimate for the triangle-area Radon transform: writing $x_2 = r \theta$, the area $\left| x_1 \wedge x_2 \right|$ equals $r \left| P_{\theta^\perp} x_1 \right|$, so the level sets are cylinders over $(d-2)$-spheres; the resulting Fourier integral operator has smoothing order $\frac{d-1}{2}$ and its parameter derivative gives the Hölder regularity needed for interior. The geometric reduction iterates the identity $\left| (y-x_0) \wedge (x_1-x_0) \wedge \cdots \right| = \left| y-x_0 \right| \cdot \left| P_{(y-x_0)^\perp} (x_1-x_0) \wedge \cdots \right|$, so each prescribed vertex reduces the rank by one and the dimension threshold by one, until only triangle areas remain. Lemma 5.1, a Marstrand–Mattila style radial-direction lemma, supplies the direction $\theta$ whose orthogonal projection keeps enough Hausdorff dimension to continue

What would settle it

A compact set $E \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ with $\dim_H(E) > \frac{d+k-1}{2}$ and two distinct points $x_0, y \in E$ for which $\left\{ \left| (y-x_0) \wedge (x_1-x_0) \wedge \cdots \wedge (x_{k-1}-x_0) \right| : x_i \in E \right\}$ has empty interior would refute Theorem 1.9 directly. More narrowly, a set in an annulus whose radial projection has dimension below $\dim_H(E) - 1$ and such that every direction in the projection leads to a shadow of dimension below $\dim_H(E) - 1$ would break Lemma 5.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.9 is the central claim: for $3 \le k \le d$, if $\dim_H(E) > \frac{d+k-1}{2}$, then for every prescribed $x_0 \in \mathbb{R}^d$ and every $y \in E \setminus \{x_0\}$, the doubly strongly pinned volume set $V_k^{x_0,y}(E)$ has nonempty interior. This is achieved by a geometric reduction (Theorem 1.8) that propagates a triangle-area threshold $X(m)$ through orthogonal projections, giving a $k$-volume threshold $X(d-k+2)+k-2$. In the base case, Theorem 1.6 establishes the strongly pinned triangle-area result at dimension $\frac{d+1}{2}$. The paper also obtains pinned nonempty interior for scalar configuration maps at $\frac{d+2}{2}$ by differentiating the level parameter, which raises the order of the generalized Radon transform by one and yields a continuous pinn

Load-bearing premise

The entire higher-volume induction depends on the radial-direction lemma (Lemma 5.1): from any compact set lying in an annulus one can find one of its own directions in which the orthogonal projection onto the hyperplane perpendicular to that direction loses less than one full dimension. If that lemma failed, the induction could not start, even if the volume sets actually did have interior.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For 3≤k≤d and any two fixed vertices in E, the k-simplex volume set has nonempty interior whenever dim_H(E)>(d+k−1)/2.
  • Since V_k^{x0,y}(E)⊂V_k^{x0}(E), the same threshold gives nonempty interior for the usual (one-pin) strongly pinned volume sets V_k^{x0}(E) when k<d.
  • Doubly pinned triangle areas have positive Lebesgue measure at (d+1)/2 and nonempty interior at (d+2)/2 for almost every second pin y.
  • Pinned generalized norm distances, variable-coefficient and Riemannian distances, and nondegenerate bilinear-form values have nonempty interior for almost every pin at dimension (d+2)/2.
  • In the full-rank case k=d, the doubly strongly pinned conclusion holds at dim_H(E)>d−1/2, complementing the one-pin Greenleaf–Iosevich–Taylor threshold d−1+1/d.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's projection calculus suggests that each additional prescribed vertex beyond the second would cost a further half dimension (the tetrahedral example already shows the jump from (d+2)/2 to (d+3)/2); a directly pinned triangle theorem that could be iterated without re-selecting directions would turn this into a general trade-off between pins and threshold.
  • If an averaged local smoothing estimate of the type the paper calls for in its final section were available, the interior threshold for scalar configurations could move from (d+2)/2 down to the positive-measure threshold (d+1)/2, which would simultaneously improve all the triangle-area corollaries.
  • The radial-direction lemma may be of independent use for other configuration problems: combined with the same cylinder factorisation, it should yield pinned nonempty-interior statements for tree configurations or restricted diagonal configurations, provided the corresponding smoothing estimates hold off the diagonal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies pinned configuration sets for scalar maps and for volumes of simplices. Its main technical results are: (i) a pinned nonempty-interior theorem (Theorem 1.2) for scalar configuration maps whose localized generalized Radon transforms are nondegenerate FIOs of smoothing order (d-1)/2, valid when the measure has finite s-energy with s>(d+2)/2; (ii) a cylinder-averaging estimate for triangle areas (Lemma 6.1) leading to a strongly pinned triangle-area theorem (Theorem 1.6) with threshold (d+1)/2; (iii) a geometric projection reduction (Theorem 1.8) converting triangle-area thresholds into thresholds for higher simplex volumes; and (iv) a doubly strongly pinned simplex-volume theorem (Theorem 1.9) with threshold (d+k-1)/2 for 3≤k≤d. The paper also gives doubly pinned triangle-area results and corollaries for generalized norms, Riemannian distances, and bilinear forms.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper establishes a strongly pinned nonempty-interior theorem for triangle areas in all dimensions at the threshold (d+1)/2 (improving on the earlier 5/3 in d=2), and a clean reduction principle for higher simplex volumes. The analytic core is sound: the rotational-curvature determinant (6.1) is computed explicitly, the Littlewood-Paley summation in Theorem 1.6 is clean, and the geometric reduction in Theorem 1.8 propagates thresholds with the correct dimensional shifts. The paper is honest about its limitations (Remark 7.2, Section 8). The results should be of interest to researchers in fractal geometry, geometric measure theory, and Fourier analysis. The main structural ideas are standard, but their combination is effective and the pinned nonempty-interior conclusions are new in several regimes.

minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 5, Lemma 5.1] The proof chooses 'a number γ > β' for the σ-Frostman condition. Please state explicitly that γ is selected with β < γ < dim_H(Ω), since that is the condition that makes such a σ exist.
  2. [Section 2.3, Lemma 2.2] The proof assumes the phase is affine in t (Φ(x,y)-t). In the triangle-area application (Lemma 6.1) the level parameter enters through Ψ(x1,x2)-t^2. The derivative-in-t argument still works, but the lemma's statement should mention that it applies to phases of the form Φ(x,y)-φ(t) with φ'≠0 on J*, or the triangle-area use should be justified separately.
  3. [Section 6, Lemma 6.2] The proof is a sketch. Please expand by one paragraph, or cite a standard reference, to show that the canonical relation of the triangle-area operator has input/output covector sizes comparable on the support of χ and that the stationary-phase argument yields the rapid decay in j-i.
  4. [Section 5, proof of Theorem 1.8] In the auxiliary assertion, after Lemma 5.1 supplies θ and ρθ∈F, the text jumps from the induction hypothesis on P_{θ⊥}F to the conclusion for V^0_r(F). The identity |x_1∧...∧x_{r-1}∧ρθ| = ρ|P_{θ⊥}x_1∧...∧P_{θ⊥}x_{r-1}| shows V^0_{r-1}(P_{θ⊥}F) ⊂ ρ^{-1}V^0_r(F); this inclusion should be stated.
  5. [Section 6, proof of Theorem 1.6] After summing in N, the notation 'γ' is used for the Hölder exponent; earlier in Lemma 5.1 γ was used for the Frostman exponent. Not a real issue, but consider renaming one of them.
  6. [Throughout] Several thresholds are written as 'd+1/2' or 'd+k-1/2' without parentheses. This is standard in the area but can be misread; consider using '(d+1)/2' and '(d+k-1)/2' consistently in displayed statements.
  7. [Section 3, Proposition 3.1] The proof of the localization argument (that at least one localized pushforward is nonzero) is deferred to after the proof. It would be cleaner to state it as a lemma or include it within the proposition's proof.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: derivation chain is self-contained; self-citations are contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claims are derived from standard external inputs and original estimates, not from fitted data or self-citation. The scalar pinned results (Theorem 1.2) follow from Proposition 3.1, whose inputs are the finite-energy/Frostman estimates of Lemma 2.1, the parameter-derivative Lemma 2.2 (derived from the fixed-parameter estimate by phase/canonical-relation arguments), the frequency-compatibility Lemma 2.3, and the Greenleaf–Iosevich–Taylor smoothing estimate [20], which is an external result not by the present authors. The triangle-area theorem (Theorem 1.6) is an independent proof via the cylinder-averaging Lemma 6.1, determinant identity (6.1), and the frequency-compatibility Lemma 6.2; no parameter is fitted and no target conclusion is assumed. The geometric reduction (Theorem 1.8) uses Lemma 5.1, whose energy-averaging argument gives finite β-energy for σ-almost every θ; because σ is supported on Ω, the existence of θ∈Ω follows directly, so the reader's concern does not amount to circularity. The identities V^{0,y}_k(E)=|y|V^0_{k-1}(F) and the induction are exact algebraic reductions, not renaming of conclusions. Self-references ([1],[2],[3],[17],[18],[25]) appear only for historical context, motivation, or threshold comparison; none is load-bearing for the main theorems. Thus the derivation is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted and no new geometric/physical entities are introduced. The paper's central claims rest on the prior Fourier-integral smoothing theory of generalized Radon transforms (specifically [20] and the classical FIO calculus), plus standard dimension theory for projections and product sets. The main internal inputs are the cylinder-averaging estimate for triangle areas and the rotational-curvature computation for the wedge-product phase.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption For nondegenerate scalar generalized Radon transforms with phase Φ(x,y)=t on regular patches, the localized operators are Fourier integral operators of order −(d−1)/2 with the L2 smoothing estimate ||T_t f_i|| ≲ 2^{−i(d−1)/2}||f_i||.
    This is the main analytic input, taken from Greenleaf-Iosevich-Taylor [20, Theorem 1.1] and the standard theory of generalized Radon transforms. It is invoked in Corollary 1.1, Theorem 1.2, and all four corollaries in Section 4.
  • standard math For localized triangle-area operator T_t^χ attached to A(x1,x2)=|x1∧x2|, the rotational-curvature determinant (6.1) is nonzero on the chosen patch, making the canonical relation a local canonical graph.
    This is proved in Lemma 6.1 with an explicit computation; the determinant equals (−1)^d 2^{d+2} Ψ^2 (x1·x2)^{d−2}, so on the patch where |x1·x2|≥c0>0 it is nonzero. It is an internal justification rather than an external input.
  • standard math A finite s-energy measure on R^d (s>1) gives zero mass to every line through the origin.
    Used in Theorem 1.6 and Theorem 1.7 to place the level sets away from the degenerate locus x1∧x2=0. The statement is true (a line has Hausdorff dimension 1 < s), but the paper does not give a proof; it is a standard energy/dimension fact.
  • domain assumption If dim_H(F) > α and F is contained in an annulus, then the radial projection Ω has dim_H(Ω) ≥ dim_H(F) − 1.
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.8 to apply Lemma 5.1. This is standard product/Lipschitz dimension theory, but the paper states it without proof; the bi-Lipschitz polar map and product-dimension inequality are the implicit justification.
  • domain assumption The local smoothing/parameter-derivative estimates for T_t^χ hold uniformly over the symbol-class bounded sets and pass to the ε-regularized family.
    This is Lemma 2.2 and is proved via oscillatory-integral phase differentiation. It is internal but relies on the standard fact that t-derivatives raise the order by at most one and preserve the canonical relation; no external unproved theorem beyond FIO calculus.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pinned nonempty interior and volumes of simplices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SRHEOLEW

@misc{pith2026260720416,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pinned nonempty interior and volumes of simplices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SRHEOLEW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20416}
}
abstract

We study pinned nonempty-interior problems for scalar two-point configurations and for volumes of simplices. For $E\subset\mathbb{R}^d$, $d\geq 2$, compact and a smooth scalar configuration map $\Phi(x,y)$, whose corresponding localized generalized Radon transforms are nondegenerate Fourier integral operators of smoothing order $(d-1)/2$, we first note how a calculation due to Greenleaf, Iosevich and Taylor can be used to obtain positive Lebesgue measure of $\Delta_\Phi^y(E)=\{\Phi(x,y):x\in E\}$ for almost every pin $y$ when $\dim_{\mathcal H}(E)>(d+1)/2$. Our first main result is to prove that the corresponding one-frequency-loss estimate for differentiation in the level parameter yields a continuous pinned density, and hence nonempty interior, for almost every pin when $d\geq3$ and $\dim_{\mathcal H}(E)>(d+2)/2$. Concrete applications include generalized norm distances, regular variable-coefficient and Riemannian distances, and dot products or nondegenerate bilinear forms on regular patches. Our principal geometric application concerns volumes of simplices. We prove a cylinder-averaging estimate for triangle areas in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and obtain positive measure for doubly pinned area sets at a dimensional threshold $(d+1)/2$ and nonempty interior at $(d+2)/2$. A projection theorem then reduces higher simplex-volume problems to triangle areas. In particular, for $3\leq k \leq d$, if $\dim_{\mathcal H}(E)>(d+k-1)/2$, then for every prescribed base point $x_0$ and every prescribed second vertex $y\in E\setminus\{x_0\}$, the set of $k$-dimensional volumes generated by $x_0,y$ and $k-1$ further points of $E$ has nonempty interior. Thus the result is doubly strongly pinned in its first two vertices.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Borges, B

    T. Borges, B. Foster, Y. Ou and E. A. Palsson,Nonempty interior of pinned distance and tree sets, Adv. Math. 493 (2026), 110917

    2026

  2. [2]

    Borges, B

    T. Borges, B. Foster, Y. Ou, E. A. Palsson and F. Romero Acosta,Falconer-type results for any finite graph with multiple pins, arXiv:2603.01954

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    Borges, B

    T. Borges, B. Foster, Y. Ou, E. A. Palsson and F. Romero Acosta,On volume vectors determined by hypergraphs in thin subsets of Euclidean space, arXiv:2607.00153

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Borges, A

    T. Borges, A. Iosevich and Y. Ou,A singular variant of the Falconer distance problem, arXiv:2306.05247

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Borges, Y

    T. Borges, Y. Ou and M. Pasquariello,From weighted paraboloid restriction to k-stars and distance graphs, arXiv:2607.10574

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Bright, C

    P. Bright, C. Marshall and S. Senger,Pinned dot product set estimates, Res. Math. Sci. 13 (2026), Paper No. 9

    2026

  7. [7]

    Bourgain,Hausdorff dimension and distance sets, Israel J

    J. Bourgain,Hausdorff dimension and distance sets, Israel J. Math. 87 (1994), 193–201

    1994

  8. [8]

    Di Nezza, G

    E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci and E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces,Bull. Sci. Math.136(2012), no. 5, 521–573

    2012

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    X. Du, L. Guth, Y. Ou, H. Wang, B. Wilson and R. Zhang,Weighted restriction estimates and application to Falconer distance set problem, Amer. J. Math. 143 (2021), 175–211. PINNED NONEMPTY INTERIOR AND VOLUMES OF SIMPLICES 25

    2021

  2. [10]

    X. Du, A. Iosevich, Y. Ou, H. Wang and R. Zhang,An improved result for Falconer’s distance set problem in even dimensions, Math. Ann. 380 (2021), 1215–1231

    2021

  3. [11]

    X. Du, Y. Ou, K. Ren and R. Zhang,New improvement to Falconer distance set problem in higher dimensions, arXiv:2309.04103

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Du and R

    X. Du and R. Zhang,Sharp L2 estimates of the Schr¨ odinger maximal function in higher dimensions,Ann. of Math. (2)189(2019), no. 3, 837–861

    2019

  5. [13]

    M. B. Erdo˘ gan,A bilinear Fourier extension theorem and applications to the distance set problem, Int. Math. Res. Not., no. 23, (2005), 1411–1425

    2005

  6. [14]

    M. B. Erdo˘ gan, D. Hart and A. Iosevich,Multiparameter projection theorems with applications to sums- products and finite point configurations in the Euclidean setting, inRecent advances in harmonic analysis and applications, Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 25, Springer, New York,...

    2013

  7. [15]

    Eswarathasan, A

    S. Eswarathasan, A. Iosevich and K. Taylor,Fourier integral operators, fractal sets, and the regular value theorem,Adv. Math.228(2011), no. 4, 2385–2402

    2011

  8. [16]

    K. J. Falconer,On the Hausdorff dimensions of distance sets, Mathematika 32 (1985), 206–212

    1985

  9. [17]

    Gaitan Montejo and E

    J. Gaitan Montejo and E. A. Palsson,On volumes of simplices in intermediate dimensions, arXiv:2605.22450

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Gaitan, A

    J. Gaitan, A. Greenleaf, E. A. Palsson and G. Psaromiligkos,On restricted Falconer distance sets, Canad. J. Math. 77 (2025), no. 2, 665–682

    2025

  11. [19]

    Galo and A

    B. Galo and A. McDonald,Volumes spanned by k-point configurations in Rd, J. Geom. Anal. 32 (2022), no. 1, Paper No. 23

    2022

  12. [20]

    Greenleaf, A

    A. Greenleaf, A. Iosevich and K. Taylor,Configuration sets with nonempty interior, J. Geom. Anal. 31 (2021), 6662–6680

    2021

  13. [21]

    Greenleaf, A

    A. Greenleaf, A. Iosevich and K. Taylor,On k-point configuration sets with nonempty interior, Mathematika 68 (2022), 163–190

    2022

  14. [22]

    Greenleaf, A

    A. Greenleaf, A. Iosevich and K. Taylor,Nonempty interior of configuration sets via microlocal partition optimization, Math. Z. 306 (2024), Paper No. 66

    2024

  15. [23]

    Greenleaf, A

    A. Greenleaf, A. Iosevich and K. Taylor,Realizing trees of configurations in thin sets, Pacific J. Math. 335.2 (2025), pp. 355-–372

    2025

  16. [24]

    Greenleaf, A

    A. Greenleaf, A. Iosevich and M. Mourgoglou,On volumes determined by subsets of Euclidean space, Forum Math. 27 (2015), no. 1, 635–646

    2015

  17. [25]

    Grafakos, A

    L. Grafakos, A. Greenleaf, A. Iosevich and E. A. Palsson,Multilinear generalized Radon transforms and point configurations, Forum Math. 27 (2015), 2323–2360

    2015

  18. [26]

    L. Guth, A. Iosevich, Y. Ou and H. Wang,On Falconer’s distance set problem in the plane, Invent. Math. 219 (2020), 779–830

    2020

  19. [27]

    Hyt¨ onen, J

    T. Hyt¨ onen, J. van Neerven, M. Veraar and L. Weis,Analysis in Banach Spaces. Volume I: Martingales and Littlewood–Paley Theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Vol. 63, Springer, Cham, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    Iosevich, M

    A. Iosevich, M. Mourgoglou and K. Taylor,On the Mattila–Sj¨ olin theorem for distance sets, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 37 (2012), 557–562

    2012

  21. [29]

    Iosevich, K

    A. Iosevich, K. Taylor and I. Uriarte-Tuero,Pinned geometric configurations in Euclidean space and Riemannian manifolds, Mathematics 9 (2021), no. 15, 1802

    2021

  22. [30]

    Kaufman,On Hausdorff dimension of projections, Mathematika 15 (1968), 153–155

    R. Kaufman,On Hausdorff dimension of projections, Mathematika 15 (1968), 153–155

    1968

  23. [31]

    Liu,AnL 2-identity and pinned distance problem, Geom

    B. Liu,AnL 2-identity and pinned distance problem, Geom. Funct. Anal. 29 (2019), no. 1, 283–294

    2019

  24. [32]

    J. M. Marstrand,Some fundamental geometrical properties of plane sets of fractional dimensions, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 4 (1954), 257–302

    1954

  25. [33]

    Mattila,Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathe- matics 44, Cambridge University Press, 1995

    P. Mattila,Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathe- matics 44, Cambridge University Press, 1995

    1995

  26. [34]

    Mattila,Hausdorff dimension, orthogonal projections and intersections with planes, Ann

    P. Mattila,Hausdorff dimension, orthogonal projections and intersections with planes, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I Math. 1 (1975), 227–244

    1975

  27. [35]

    Mattila and P

    P. Mattila and P. Sj¨ olin,Regularity of distance measures and sets, Math. Nachr. 204 (1999), 157–162

    1999

  28. [36]

    McDonald,Areas spanned by point configurations in the plane, Proc

    A. McDonald,Areas spanned by point configurations in the plane, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (2021), no. 5, 2035–2049

    2021

  29. [37]

    Orponen,On the dimension and smoothness of radial projections, Anal

    T. Orponen,On the dimension and smoothness of radial projections, Anal. PDE 12 (2019), 1273–1294

    2019

  30. [38]

    Peres and W

    Y. Peres and W. Schlag,Smoothness of projections, Bernoulli convolutions, and the dimension of exceptions, Duke Math. J. 102 (2000), 193–251

    2000

  31. [39]

    Shmerkin and A

    P. Shmerkin and A. Yavicoli,On the volumes of simplices determined by a subset of Rd, Ann. Fenn. Math. 50 (2025), 97–108

    2025

  32. [40]

    Wolff,Decay of circular means of Fourier transforms of measures, Int

    T. Wolff,Decay of circular means of Fourier transforms of measures, Int. Math. Res. Not. 1999, no. 10, 547–567. Email address:palsson@vt.edu 26 E. A. PALSSON AND G. PSAROMILIGKOS Department of Mathematics, Virginia Tech, Virginia, V A 24061, USA Email address:gpsaromiligkos@ut...

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.