Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces

As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 37 of 37 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.20425.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2607.20425 v1

Coverage vector

measured 37 of 37 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.599412Z

measured 37 of 37 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

37 of 37 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved37
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation c369697a-8e97-4611-a2e5-c2b444636472 · outbound

This paper cites Rhetoric.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Rhetoric

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.508517Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 61cb113e-b34a-457c-9549-c7624dfd74be · outbound

This paper cites The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.511598Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e06cae6e-d27f-4765-b382-e87cf38e8761 · outbound

This paper cites Writing with Power: Techniques for Mastering the Writing Process.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Writing with Power: Techniques for Mastering the Writing Process

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.515955Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation decf034e-3789-4260-9f11-728ba1142a30 · outbound

This paper cites The Art of Fiction: Notes on Craft for Young Writers.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces The Art of Fiction: Notes on Craft for Young Writers

Reference 4

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.518360Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 1bbd1088-96c4-4e18-945d-cbfeea1a3e5d · outbound

This paper cites The technique of clear writing.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces The technique of clear writing

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.520847Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9fb101ef-f88b-4b47-8f3f-86d321dcfd2c · outbound

This paper cites A computational analysis of style, affect, and imagery in contemporary poetry.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces A computational analysis of style, affect, and imagery in contemporary poetry

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.523242Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 1d25c4bf-26b3-4592-901a-780762ac35b0 · outbound

This paper cites Automated essay scoring: A survey of the state of the art.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Automated essay scoring: A survey of the state of the art

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.525953Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 1c459e83-2141-43c1-bd3b-5f081499ca3b · outbound

This paper cites Peter Kincaid, Robert P.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Peter Kincaid, Robert P

Reference 8

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.528013Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7a12c10c-682d-459f-b4b7-e93a7a49e383 · outbound

This paper cites RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.536035Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 8817d11e-c11c-4551-89db-de542ecae803 · outbound

This paper cites G- E val: NLG evaluation using GPT-4 with better human alignment.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces G- E val: NLG evaluation using GPT-4 with better human alignment

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.538604Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation da0e4f4f-b16c-4be7-9bec-e4dc83bdd0bb · outbound

This paper cites A survey of modern authorship attribution methods.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces A survey of modern authorship attribution methods

Reference 13

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.540798Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5c6e6eb8-661e-4364-9540-9fc307e8eb1d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Unresolved cited work

Reference 14

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.542893Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7b692412-37ec-4675-bc89-1e19bed8bd88 · outbound

This paper cites A review of deep-neural automated essay scoring models.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces A review of deep-neural automated essay scoring models

Reference 15

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.544897Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3ab980fd-12d8-4aaa-a026-e20a9a180c5d · outbound

This paper cites Wilson and Jonathan W.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Wilson and Jonathan W

Reference 17

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.549359Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 63fcf9a9-4f51-4781-b01e-224645df3e92 · outbound

This paper cites Judging LLM -as-a-judge with MT-Bench and chatbot arena.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Judging LLM -as-a-judge with MT-Bench and chatbot arena

Reference 18

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.551488Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d62585c6-34df-4826-96ac-49a6b01453ca · outbound

This paper cites -350 , note=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces -350 , note=

Reference 19

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.553585Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 8239589a-202a-4130-8ccf-2652f2628bb6 · outbound

This paper cites 1947 , publisher=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces 1947 , publisher=

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.555952Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9f1c6965-ca28-45b5-b1d1-48cc88ed00c3 · outbound

This paper cites 2014 , publisher=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces 2014 , publisher=

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.557983Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d86adfe0-35ed-4af4-969b-4fb3e5ebecdf · outbound

This paper cites 1991 , publisher=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces 1991 , publisher=

Reference 22

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.560109Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 13cfe7aa-f514-4268-ad42-f6fcc22bccf3 · outbound

This paper cites 1981 , publisher=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces 1981 , publisher=

Reference 23

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.562108Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 701a8507-5233-40c4-8ef7-862aea67a44e · outbound

This paper cites Research Branch Report , volume=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Research Branch Report , volume=

Reference 24

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.564238Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation fab43e65-a1ef-473c-a49e-40f63036c127 · outbound

This paper cites McGraw-Hill , year=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces McGraw-Hill , year=

Reference 25

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.566282Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b4e50d65-148d-44ad-8bed-75cd2efde0ad · outbound

This paper cites Journal of Applied Psychology , volume=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Journal of Applied Psychology , volume=

Reference 26

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.568801Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 0edfc99a-5e04-49a3-9ca7-3404418f3fdc · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Unresolved cited work

Reference 27

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.571179Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6270fff8-29cb-4fff-baac-2c5894ce19e9 · outbound

This paper cites RLAIF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces RLAIF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.573344Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation de172999-4355-4620-83fb-a5f009870abf · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Unresolved cited work

Reference 29

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.575567Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 32ab64a9-ccc8-484b-a5fe-bc79565cde51 · outbound

This paper cites Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , volume=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , volume=

Reference 30

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.577897Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c59694e7-13df-4d9d-a19b-217b4dc602ce · outbound

This paper cites DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report

Reference 31

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.580041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation daa1f579-d7eb-4d45-863f-f6da53575701 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) , pages=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) , pages=

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.582511Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b1c9bbca-8f3b-498d-9608-17964012af17 · outbound

This paper cites Behaviormetrika , volume=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Behaviormetrika , volume=

Reference 33

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.584651Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 2610e3ff-7044-4bcc-9cdc-dffb85963110 · outbound

This paper cites Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , volume=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , volume=

Reference 34

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.586943Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f3149282-7c40-41ea-a0fc-b864ea2b2712 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature , pages=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature , pages=

Reference 35

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.589412Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e674fe3e-ddab-4a68-bb76-2ecfa25e8096 · outbound

This paper cites Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Reference 36

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.591574Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 4ca312a5-2704-4819-a31a-e6bfbfa125e7 · outbound

This paper cites Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 37

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.593610Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 12972055-358b-4597-b986-6c8739118079 · outbound

This paper cites Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators

Reference 38

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.595679Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 48c6a736-6094-48ba-be94-2cf8e6e86dbc · outbound

This paper cites Benchmarking Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models as Evaluators.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces Benchmarking Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models as Evaluators

Reference 39

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.597565Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f9734478-1514-413e-994c-4ecf1687a209 · outbound

This paper cites On the Limitations of Using.

What is Good? Extracting and Testing Implicit Theories of Literary Quality from LLM Reasoning Traces On the Limitations of Using

Reference 40

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T16:42:05.599412Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.