Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 79 references

Uniform Large Deviations of Mckean-Vlasov Stochastic Fractional $(\alpha,p)$-Laplacian Equations Driven by Superlinear Noise on $\mathbb{R}^d$

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes global-in-time well-posedness and uniform large deviation principles for distribution-dependent stochastic fractional (α,p)-Laplacian equations on R^d driven by superlinear multiplicative noise.

desk verdict First uniform LDPs for the nonlinear fractional (α,p)-Laplacian with superlinear distribution-dependent noise on R^d, but two load-bearing estimates are omitted, so I would send it to referees only with a demand to fill them. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21862 v1 pith:3YLKI65G submitted 2026-07-23 math.PR

Renhai Wang , Zhang Chen , Bixiang Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 37L5537B5535B4135B40
keywords largedeviationsuniformdeviationprinciplefractionalp-Laplaciandistribution-dependentSPDEsuperlinearnoiseunboundeddomainratefunctionweakconvergencemethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to prove that a wide class of distribution-dependent stochastic partial differential equations — nonlinear fractional (α,p)-Laplacian equations on the whole space R^d driven by superlinear multiplicative noise — is globally well-posed and obeys uniform large deviation principles as the noise intensity tends to zero. The central claim is that, under monotone-dissipative conditions on the drift and growth restrictions on the superlinear diffusion coefficients, the solution family satisfies both standard notions of uniform LDP (one over bounded sets of initial data, one over compact initial data) with a good rate function: the minimal L² control cost needed to drive a deterministic controlled equation to a given path. This would be the first large-deviation result for nonlinear fractional p-Laplacian SPDEs on unbounded domains, extending earlier results that only covered linear or Lipschitz cases. The reason to care is that uniform large deviations give exponential decay rates for rare events that are uniform in the initial condition, a prerequisite for exit-time and invariant-measure asymptotics.

What carries the argument

The central object is the deterministic controlled equation and the associated solution map M^0_{ψ0} that sends a control u to the path ψ^u. The rate function I_{ψ0} is the infimum of half the squared ℓ²-norm of the control over all controls producing a given path. The load-bearing mechanism is the proof that this map is continuous from the weak topology of L²([0,T],ℓ²) to the strong topology of the path space; this is achieved by uniform tail-ends estimates (showing solutions are uniformly small outside large balls) combined with the monotonicity and hemicontinuity of the fractional (α,p)-Laplacian operator and the Arzelà–Ascoli theorem. This weak-to-strong continuity is what makes the rate

What would settle it

Choose p = 4, q = 4 and superlinear coefficients with p* = q* = 3.5 (above the paper's threshold (p+2)/2 = 3) while satisfying the other conditions, and compute the analogous uniform tail-ends estimate for a large ball Q_n. If the estimate fails or the controlled solution map is not weak-to-strong continuous at that growth rate, the paper's scope claim would be refuted; conversely, writing out the omitted proof of Lemma 2.8 and finding a uniform-in-k constant would support it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, it establishes that problem (1.1) has a unique global solution for any square-integrable initial condition and that the family of solutions satisfies a uniform large deviation principle in the path space C([0,T],H)∩L^p([0,T],V1)∩L^q([0,T],V2), uniformly over bounded sets of initial data, with the good rate function I_{ψ0}(ψ) = inf { 1/2 ∫_0^T ||u||²_{ℓ2} dt : u ∈ L²([0,T],ℓ²) and ψ^u = ψ }. Over compact initial data, the stronger variant of the uniform LDP — the one that controls probabilities of open and closed sets uniformly in the initial state — also holds. The proof combines a domain-expansion and monotone argument for well-posedness and, for the LDP, a weak-co

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assertion — cited from earlier work rather than proved here — that the truncated problems on bounded balls are well-posed with the stated regularity and satisfy the uniform-in-k estimates of Lemma 2.8; if that assertion fails, the global well-posedness theorem and both uniform LDPs built on it collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, the full nonlinear fractional (α,p)-Laplacian case on R^d — not just the linear p=2 case — is covered by large-deviation theory.
  • The rate function I_{ψ0} gives explicit exponential decay rates, uniform over bounded initial data, for all rare events in the path space.
  • The compact-initial-data uniform LDP follows with the same rate function, so the large-deviation bounds are stable under perturbations of the initial state.
  • The paper claims a global well-posedness result for superlinear diffusion and arbitrary-polynomial drift; if correct, this fills a gap for distribution-dependent fractional p-Laplacian equations on unbounded domains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The growth cap p*, q* < (p+2)/2 looks like a real threshold, not just a proof artifact: the estimates absorb the superlinear diffusion through powers of the dissipative drift, and above that threshold the absorption fails. A testable extension is to check whether the weak-to-strong continuity of the controlled map genuinely breaks down at p* = (p+2)/2.
  • The bounded-domain well-posedness and uniform-in-k estimates are the place where the argument is most likely to be challenged; completing those proofs would make the whole chain self-contained and would clarify whether the growth cap can be widened.
  • The same combination of uniform tail-ends estimates and pseudo-monotonicity should transfer to linear fractional Laplacians (p=2) and to other nonlocal operators with comparable kernel growth, yielding uniform LDPs for distribution-dependent fractional equations with superlinear noise on unbounded domains.
  • The uniform LDP is a natural input for studying small-noise exit times from domains and for proving concentration of invariant measures as ε→0; those applications are not pursued in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a class of McKean–Vlasov stochastic partial differential equations on the whole space R^d, driven by a nonlocal nonlinear fractional (α,p)-Laplacian (α∈(0,1), p>2), distribution-dependent drift terms with polynomial growth, and superlinear multiplicative noise. The authors claim (Theorem 1.1) global-in-time well-posedness under conditions A and B, and, under a stronger condition B1 with p*,q*∈(2,(p+2)/2), uniform Freidlin–Wentzell and Dembo–Zeitouni large deviation principles (Theorems 1.2 and 1.3) in the intersection space C([0,T],H)∩L^p([0,T],V_1)∩L^q([0,T],V_2). The method combines domain expansion on balls Q_k, monotone operator theory, uniform tail-ends estimates, and the Salins weak convergence criterion for uniform LDPs. Many auxiliary results are stated with proofs omitted or delegated to previous papers.

Significance. If the result is correct, it would be the first large-deviation theory for stochastic fractional (α,p)-Laplacian equations with superlinear noise on unbounded domains, extending earlier work on the linear fractional Laplacian (p=2). The use of uniform tail-ends estimates to compensate for the lack of compact Sobolev embeddings on R^d is a natural and promising strategy. The paper also honestly states the technical restriction p*,q*∈(2,(p+2)/2) and indicates that the method fails beyond that range. However, the current manuscript is not self-contained: several load-bearing lemmas are stated without proof, so the contribution is conditional on extensive omitted arguments.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.7, Lemma 2.8] Lemma 2.8 provides the uniform-in-k estimates for the truncated problems that are used throughout §2.8 to justify weak compactness, the identification of limits, and the energy inequality for the global solution. Its proof is omitted with only the note 'The details of the proof are omitted here.' This is a load-bearing gap: if the constants in Lemma 2.8 are not independent of k, the limit passage in (2.29) fails and Theorem 1.1 collapses. The authors should provide the complete proof or state a precise theorem from the literature whose hypotheses are verified.
  2. [§2.6, around (2.23)–(2.27)] The well-posedness of the bounded-domain problem (2.23) is imported: 'by applying the fixed point theorem as in [24] and the arguments of [75,71], one can prove...'. Reference [24] treats the linear case p=2, while [71] and [75] may not cover the exact combination of distribution-dependent drift and superlinear multiplicative noise with the fractional (α,p)-Laplacian. The energy identity (2.27) and the subsequent weak-limit identification (2.28)–(2.38) depend on the existence and regularity properties of ψ_k. The manuscript must identify the specific theorem used and verify all its hypotheses, or give a self-contained proof for (2.23).
  3. [§4.4, Lemmas 4.5 and 4.6] Lemmas 4.5 and 4.6 are essential for Lemma 4.7, which provides the uniform convergence in probability condition (C1) of the Salins criterion (Theorem 3.5). Lemma 4.5 simply states 'proof ... omitted here', and Lemma 4.6 says 'The proof is standard, and we do not repeat the details.' The estimates must be uniform over ψ0∈B_R(H), u∈A_N, and ε∈(0,1), and the O(ε) rate in Lemma 4.6 is nontrivial because of the distribution-dependence and superlinear noise. These gaps must be filled or reduced to a citable result with a verification of its assumptions.
  4. [§2.8, pathwise uniqueness paragraph] The pathwise uniqueness argument jumps from the inequality (2.40) to the conclusion E[e^{-∫G} ∥ψ1(t)-ψ2(t)∥²]=0. The stochastic integral in (2.40) must be shown to be a martingale (not merely a local martingale) using the available integrability; this is not demonstrated. Since uniqueness is part of Theorem 1.1 and is later used for the controlled equations in Theorem 4.1, the argument should be made explicit.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] Numerous typographical errors: 'Mckean' should be 'McKean', 'samilar' → 'similar', 'toplogy' → 'topology', 'involing' → 'involving', 'arive' → 'arrive', 'cnsequence' → 'consequence'. A careful proofreading is needed.
  2. [Eq. (4.24)] In Lemma 4.3, the displayed estimate (4.24) contains E[∥ρ_n ψ_u(t)∥²] although ψ_u is a deterministic solution of (4.5). Remove the expectation.
  3. [Condition B1, line before (4.3)] The condition on σ_4 is written in a confusing way: σ4 ∈ ℓ1(N, L∞(Rd) ∩ ℓ2(N, L4(Rd) ∩ ...)). This should be rewritten as separate summability conditions, e.g., σ4 ∈ ℓ1(N,L∞) ∩ ℓ2(N,L^4) ∩ ... to make the subsequent estimates (4.4) transparent.
  4. [Theorem 1.2, Step 2] The text says 'the function I_{ψ0}:H→[0,∞]' but the rate function is defined on C([0,T],H)∩L^p([0,T],V_1)∩L^q([0,T],V_2). The domain is misstated.
  5. [§1.4] The phrase 'even in the case where s=1 and p=2' appears to be a leftover from a different parameter notation; 's' is not defined. Please correct.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Bounded-domain existence and uniform estimates are load-bearing and outsourced to same-author papers or omitted proofs; the LDP propagation itself has independent content.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2.6, display (2.25)]
    "Since V_{1,k}\cap V_{2,k} is separable and dense in H_k, for every \psi_0 \in L^2(\Omega,\mathcal{F}_0,H) and k\in\mathbb{N}, by applying the fixed point theorem as in [24] and the arguments of [75, 71], one can prove that problem (2.23) has a unique solution \psi_k"

    Theorem 1.1 (global well-posedness), the foundation for the LDP skeleton M^0 and the rate function (4.80), is obtained by taking a limit of the bounded-domain problems (2.23). But the existence of these approximate solutions is not proved here: it is delegated to the authors' own [24], [75] and [71]. If those works do not already cover distribution-dependent drift and superlinear multiplicative noise for the fractional (α,p)-Laplacian on Q_k, then (2.25), the energy identity (2.27), Lemma 2.8 and the weak limits (2.29a)-(2.29j) lack a basis. This is a load-bearing self-citation, though not an equation-level definitional equivalence.

  2. other [Lemma 2.8, Section 2.7]
    "By the energy equation (2.27) and the relations (2.24a)-(2.24e), we can use (2.15), (2.18) and Lemma 2.2 to derive the uniform estimates. The details of the proof are omitted here."

    This is not a circular equation; it is an explicitly omitted proof. The uniform-in-k estimates of Lemma 2.8 are the sole justification for the weak convergences (2.29a)-(2.29j) in the proof of Theorem 1.1 and hence for the existence of the limiting solution whose controlled analogue defines the rate function. The manuscript itself flags the omission, and the subsequent LDP argument cannot proceed without these estimates.

full rationale

The LDP part of the paper is not circular: the weak-convergence criterion is from Salins [57] (external), and the weak-to-strong continuity of the controlled solution map (Lemma 4.4), the uniform tail-ends estimates (Lemma 4.3), the convergence in probability (Lemma 4.7), and the compactness of level sets are argued in substantial detail from the stated assumptions. I found no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no rate function defined by its own target, and no ansatz smuggled in through citation in the LDP core. The circularity burden concentrates at the front end: the global well-posedness theorem on which the entire LDP construction rests is not self-contained. The existence of the bounded-domain approximations (2.23) is asserted via the authors' own [24,75,71], and Lemma 2.8's uniform estimates are explicitly stated without proof; Lemmas 4.5 and 4.6 are also omitted as 'standard'. These are load-bearing gaps rather than constructional equivalences, so the paper does not reach the 6+ range, but the central derivation is not fully self-contained either.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest mainly on the stated hypotheses on the drift/diffusion/kernel, on the Salins weak-convergence theorem, and on a set of uniform estimates that are either imported from the authors' prior papers or stated without proof. No numerical free parameters are fitted. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Kernel two-sided bound: K^{-1}|x-y|^{-(d+αp)} ≤ K_α^p(x,y) ≤ K|x-y|^{-(d+αp)}; singularity, symmetry, translation invariance, continuity of x→K(x,y).
    Section 2.1. This equivalence with the fractional Sobolev kernel underpins the Gagliardo seminorm estimates in Lemma 2.2 and Lemma 4.2.
  • domain assumption Conditions A and B1: dissipative/monotone drift with polynomial growth and locally Lipschitz superlinear diffusion with stated ℓ^1 integrability of σ_i.
    Sections 2.3 and 4. All theorems are conditional on these hypotheses; they define the equation class rather than being derived.
  • ad hoc to paper Restriction p* ∈ (2,(p+2)/2), q* ∈ (2,(q+2)/2) for the LDP part.
    Section 1.6 and Condition B1. The authors state the method fails when p* ≥ (p+2)/2; this is a technical constraint added to make the weak-to-strong continuity proof work.
  • domain assumption Bounded-domain existence and estimates for the truncated equations (2.23) are valid, imported from [24,75,71].
    Section 2.6 after (2.25). The proof is delegated: 'by applying the fixed point theorem as in [24] and the arguments of [75,71]'.
  • ad hoc to paper Lemma 2.8 uniform estimates hold as stated.
    Section 2.7: 'The details of the proof are omitted here.' Theorem 1.1's domain-expansion limit relies on these estimates.
  • ad hoc to paper Lemmas 4.5 and 4.6 hold (uniform bounds for shifted stochastic equations and convergence ψ^ε → ψ0 at rate ε).
    Section 4.4: proofs are 'similar to' previous ones or 'standard' and omitted; Lemma 4.7 depends on them.
  • standard math Salins' weak-convergence criterion (Theorem 3.5) and the equivalence theorem (Lemma 3.4) are correct and applicable.
    Section 3 imports these external theorems as the framework for the uniform LDPs.
  • standard math Compact Sobolev embeddings W^{α,p}(Q_k) ↪ L^2(Q_k) ↪ dual, Arzelà-Ascoli, BDG inequality, Itô formula.
    Used throughout Section 4 to get precompactness and stochastic estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uniform Large Deviations of Mckean-Vlasov Stochastic Fractional $(\alpha,p)$-Laplacian Equations Driven by Superlinear Noise on $\mathbb{R}^d$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3YLKI65G

@misc{pith2026260721862,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uniform Large Deviations of Mckean-Vlasov Stochastic Fractional $(\alpha,p)$-Laplacian Equations Driven by Superlinear Noise on $\mathbbR^d$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3YLKI65G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21862}
}
abstract

The global-in-time well-posedness and uniform large deviation principles (LDPs) are investigated for a wide class of Mckean-Vlasov stochastic non-local fractional $(\alpha,p)$-Laplacian equations with $\alpha \in (0,1)$ and $p>2$ driven by superlinear multiplicative noise defined on the whole space $\mathbb{R}^d$, where the non-local nonlinear fractional $(\alpha,p)$-Laplace operator is defined by a singular, symmetrical and translation invariant kernel function, the distribution-dependent drift terms have arbitrary polynomial growth and the distribution-dependent diffusion terms have superlinear growth. The global-in-time well-posedness is established under these conditions by using the monotone method and a domain expansion argument. Under additional conditions on the growth of diffusion terms, we establish the Freidlin-Wentzell and Dembo-Zeitouni uniform LDPs by using the generalized weak convergence method developed by Salins (Probab. Surv., 16:99-142, 2019). The idea of uniform tail-ends estimates, the pseudo monotone technique and the Arzel\`{a}-Ascoli theorem are combined to prove the weak-to-strong continuity of solution operators of the controlled equations in order to overcome many difficulties caused by the noncompactness of Sobolev embeddings on $\mathbb{R}^d$ and the nonlinearity of the fractional $(\alpha,p)$-Laplace operator. The superlinearly growing diffusion term is carefully controlled by using the dissipative drift terms and several algebraic inequalities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    Z. Chen, B. Wang, Well-posedness and large deviations of fractional McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded domains, 2024, arXiv:2406.10694

    arXiv 2024

  2. [74]

    R. Wang, P. Chen, B. Wang, Fractional (α, p)-Laplacian equations driven by superlinear noise onR d: global solvability and invariant measures, 2025, submitted

    2025

  3. [75]

    Martingale Solutions of Fractional Stochastic Reaction-Diffusion Equations Driven by Superlinear Noise

    B. Wang, Martingale Solutions of Fractional Stochastic Reaction-Diffusion Equations Driven by Superlinear Noise, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.12180

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.12180

  4. [71]

    R. Wang, T. Caraballo, N.H. Tuan. Mean attractors and invariant measures of locally monotone and generally coercive SPDEs driven by superlinear noise, J. Differential Equations, 381 (2024) 209-259

    2024

  5. [1]

    S. Abe, S. Thurner, Anomalous diffusion in view of Einsteins 1905 theory of Brownian motion, Physica A, 356 (2005) 403-407

    1905

  6. [2]

    F. E. Browder, Non-linear equations of Evolution, Ann. Math., 80 (1964) 485-523

    1964

  7. [3]

    Brzezniak, B

    Z. Brzezniak, B. Goldys, T. Jegaraj, Large deviations and transitions between equilibria for stochastic Landau- Lifshitz-Gilbert equation, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 226 (2017), 497-558

    2017

  8. [4]

    Biswasa, A

    A. Biswasa, A. Budhirajab, Exit time and invariant measure asymptotics for small noise constrained diffusions, Stochastic processes and their applications, 235 (2011) 899-924

    2011

Show all 79 references
  1. [5]

    Budhiraja, P

    A. Budhiraja, P. Dupuis, A variational representation for positive functionals of infinite dimensional Brownian motion, Probab. Math. Statist., 20 (2000) 39-61

    2000

  2. [6]

    Budhiraja, P

    A. Budhiraja, P. Dupuis, V. Maroulas, Large deviations for infinite dimensional stochastic dynamical systems, Ann. Probab., 36 (2008) 1390-1420

    2008

  3. [7]

    Buckdahn, J

    R. Buckdahn, J. Li, S. Peng, C. Rainer, Mean-field stochastic differential equations and associated PDEs, Ann. Probab., 45(2) (2017) 824-878

    2017

  4. [8]

    S.S. Byun, H. Kim, K. Song, Nonlocal Harnack inequality for fractional elliptic equations with Orlicz growth, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 55 (2023) 2382-2399

    2023

  5. [9]

    Barbu, Nonlinear Differential Equations of Monotone Types in Banach Spaces, Springer, New York, 2010

    V. Barbu, Nonlinear Differential Equations of Monotone Types in Banach Spaces, Springer, New York, 2010

    2010

  6. [10]

    Brasco, E

    L. Brasco, E. Lindgren, A. Schikorra, Higher H¨ older regularity for the fractionalp-Laplacian in the superquadratic case, Adv. Math., 338 (2018) 782-846

    2018

  7. [11]

    Barrios, A

    B. Barrios, A. Figalli, X. Ros-Oton, Global regularity for the free boundary in the obstacle problem for the fractional Laplacian, American journal of mathematics, 140(2) (2018) 415-47

    2018

  8. [12]

    Bjorland, L

    C. Bjorland, L. Caffarelli, A. Figalli, Nonlocal tug-of-war and the infinity fractional Laplacian, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 65 (2012) 337-380

    2012

  9. [13]

    Caffarelli, S

    L.A. Caffarelli, S. Salsa, L. Silvestre, Regularity estimates for the solution and the free boundary of the obstacle problem for the fractional Laplacian, Inventiones mathematicae, 171 (2008) 425-461

    2008

  10. [14]

    Caffarelli, J.M

    L.A. Caffarelli, J.M. Roquejoffre, Y. Sire, Variational problems with free boundaries for the fractional Laplacian, Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 12 (2010) 1151-1179

    2010

  11. [15]

    Castro, T

    A.D. Castro, T. Kuusi, G. Palatucci, Nonlocal harnack inequalities, Journal of Functional Analysis, 267 (2014) 1807-1836

    2014

  12. [16]

    Chenal, A

    F. Chenal, A. Millet, Uniform large deviations for parabolic SPDEs and applications, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 72 (1997) 161-186

    1997

  13. [17]

    Cerrai, M

    S. Cerrai, M. Rockner, Large deviations for stochastic reaction-diffusion systems with multiplicative noise and non-Lipschitz reaction term, Ann. Probab., 32 (2004) 1100-1139

    2004

  14. [18]

    Cerrai, A

    S. Cerrai, A. Debussche, Large deviations for the two-dimensional stochastic Navier-Stokes equation with van- ishing noise correlation, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare Probab. Stat., 55 (2019) 211-236

    2019

  15. [19]

    Chow, Large deviation problem for some parabolic It¨ o equations, Commun

    P.L. Chow, Large deviation problem for some parabolic It¨ o equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 45(1) (1992) 97-120. 41

    1992

  16. [20]

    Chueshov, A

    I. Chueshov, A. Millet, Stochastic 2D hydrodynamical type systems: Well posedness and large deviations, Appl. Math. Optim., 61 (2010), 379-420

    2010

  17. [21]

    P. Chen, B. Wang, R. Wang, X. Zhang, Multivalued random dynamics of Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equations driven by nonlinear colored noise on unbounded domains, Mathematische Annalen, 386 (2023) 343-373

    2023

  18. [22]

    P. Chen, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, Asymptotic behavior of non-autonomous fractional stochasticp-Laplacian equations with delay onR n, J. Dynam. Differ. Equ., 35 (2023) 3459-3485

    2023

  19. [23]

    Z. Chen, B. Wang, Invariant measures of fractional stochastic delay reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded domains, Nonlinearity, 34 (2021) 3969-4016

    2021

  20. [25]

    Caraballo, K

    T. Caraballo, K. Liu, On exponential stability criteria of stochastic partial differential equations, Stochastic processes and their applications, 83 (1999) 289-301

    1999

  21. [26]

    Da Prato, J

    G. Da Prato, J. Zabczyk, Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimensions, Cambridge University Press,1992

    1992

  22. [27]

    Di Nezza, G

    E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci, E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces, Bull. Sci. Math., 136 (2012) 521-573

    2012

  23. [28]

    Dembo, O

    A. Dembo, O. Zeitouni, Large Deviations Techniques and Applications 38, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010

    2010

  24. [29]

    Dupuis, R

    P. Dupuis, R. S. Ellis, A Weak Convergence Approach to the Theory of Large Deviations. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1997

    1997

  25. [30]

    M. I. Freidlin, A. D. Wentzell, Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems, Springer Verlag, New York, 2012

    2012

  26. [31]

    Freidlin, Random perturbations of reaction-diffusion equations: the quasi-deterministic approximations, Trans

    M.I. Freidlin, Random perturbations of reaction-diffusion equations: the quasi-deterministic approximations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 305 (1988), 665-697

    1988

  27. [32]

    Grigorenko, E

    I. Grigorenko, E. Grigorenko, Chaotic dynamics of the fractional Lorenz system, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91 (2003) 1-4

    2003

  28. [33]

    A. Gu, D. Li, B. Wang, H. Yang, Regularity of random attractors for fractional stochastic reaction-diffusion equations onR n, J. Differential Equations, 264 (2018) 7094-7137

    2018

  29. [34]

    Gautier, Uniform large deviations for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with multiplicative noise, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 115 (2005) 1904-1927

    E. Gautier, Uniform large deviations for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with multiplicative noise, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 115 (2005) 1904-1927

    2005

  30. [35]

    Hong, S.S

    W. Hong, S.S. Hu, W. Liu, McKean-Vlasov SDEs and SPDEs with locally monotone coefficients, Ann. Appl. Probab., 34(2) (2024) 2136-2189

    2024

  31. [36]

    Kac, Probability and Related Topics in the Physical Sciences, Interscience Publishers, New York (1958)

    M. Kac, Probability and Related Topics in the Physical Sciences, Interscience Publishers, New York (1958)

    1958

  32. [37]

    Kinra, M.T

    K. Kinra, M.T. Mohan, R. Wang, Asymptotically autonomous robustness of non-autonomous random at- tractors for stochastic convective Brinkman-Forchheimer equations onR 3, Int. Math. Res. Not., (2023), https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/ rnad279

    2023 doi

  33. [38]

    Krylov, B.L

    N.V. Krylov, B.L. Rozovskii, Stochastic evolution equations, Journal of Soviet Mathematics, 16 (1981) 1233-1277

    1981

  34. [39]

    Lindgren, P

    E. Lindgren, P. Lindqvist, Fractional eigenvalues, Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 49 (2014) 795-826

    2014

  35. [40]

    D. Li, B. Wang, X. Wang, Limiting behavior of invariant measures of stochastic delay lattice systems, J. Dyn. Diff. Eqns., 34 (2022) 1453-1487. 42

    2022

  36. [41]

    W. Liu, M. R¨ ockner, SPDE in Hilbert space with locally monotone coeffcients, Journal of Functional Analysis, 259 (2010) 2902-2922

    2010

  37. [42]

    W. Liu, Y. Song, J. Zhai, T. Zhang, Large and moderate deviation principles for McKean-Vlasov SDEs with jumps, Potential Anal., 59(3) (2023) 1141-1190

    2023

  38. [43]

    Lasry, P.L

    J.M. Lasry, P.L. Lions, Mean field games. Jpn. J. Math., 2(1) (2007) 229-260

    2007

  39. [44]

    Muratori, The fractional Laplacian in power-weightedL p spaces: Integration-by-parts formulas and self- adjointness, Journal of Functional Analysis, 271 (2016) 3662-3694

    M. Muratori, The fractional Laplacian in power-weightedL p spaces: Integration-by-parts formulas and self- adjointness, Journal of Functional Analysis, 271 (2016) 3662-3694

    2016

  40. [45]

    Martinelli, E

    F. Martinelli, E. Olivieri, E. Scoppola, Small random perturbations of finite-and infinite-dimensional dynamical systems: unpredictability of exit times, J. Statist. Phys., 55 (1989) 477-504

    1989

  41. [46]

    McKean, A class of Markov processes associated with nonlinear parabolic equations, Proc

    H.P. McKean, A class of Markov processes associated with nonlinear parabolic equations, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 56 (1966) 1907-1911

    1966

  42. [47]

    Mohan, Stochastic convective Brinkman-Forchheimer equations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09376, 2020

    M.T. Mohan, Stochastic convective Brinkman-Forchheimer equations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09376, 2020

    2007 arXiv

  43. [48]

    Minty, Monotone (non-linear) operators in Hilbert space, Duke

    G.J. Minty, Monotone (non-linear) operators in Hilbert space, Duke. Math. J., 29 (1962) 341-346

    1962

  44. [49]

    Maz´ on, J.D

    J.M. Maz´ on, J.D. Rossi, J. Toledo, Fractionalp-Laplacian evolution equations, J. Math. Pures Appl., 105 (2016) 810-844

    2016

  45. [50]

    Moen, New weighted estimates for bilinear fractional integral operators, Trans

    K. Moen, New weighted estimates for bilinear fractional integral operators, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 366 (2013) 627-646

    2013

  46. [51]

    Pardoux, ´Equations aux D´ eriv´ ees Partielles Stochastiques Non Lin´ eaires Monotones

    E. Pardoux, ´Equations aux D´ eriv´ ees Partielles Stochastiques Non Lin´ eaires Monotones. Th` ese, Universit´ e Paris XI, 1975

    1975

  47. [52]

    Peszat, Large deviation principle for stochastic evolution equations, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 98 (1994) 113-136

    S. Peszat, Large deviation principle for stochastic evolution equations, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 98 (1994) 113-136

    1994

  48. [53]

    J. Ren, X. Zhang, Freidlin-Wentzell’s large deviations for stochastic equations, Journal of Functional Analysis, 254 (2008) 3148-3172

    2008

  49. [54]

    R¨ ockner, T

    M. R¨ ockner, T. Zhang, X. Zhang, Large deviations for stochastic tamed 3D Navier-Stokes equations, Appl. Math. Optim., 61 (2010) 267-285

    2010

  50. [55]

    Sato, L´ evy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Distributions, Cambridge Stud

    K. Sato, L´ evy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Distributions, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math., 68, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999

    1999

  51. [56]

    Salins, A

    M. Salins, A. Budhiraja, P. Dupuis, Uniform large deviation principles for Banach space valued stochastic evo- lution equations, Tran. Amer. Math. Soc., 372 (2019) 8363-8421

    2019

  52. [57]

    Salins, Equivalences and counterexamples between several definitions of the uniform large deviations principle, Probab

    M. Salins, Equivalences and counterexamples between several definitions of the uniform large deviations principle, Probab. Surv., 16 (2019) 99-142

    2019

  53. [58]

    Sowers, Large deviations for a reaction-diffusion equation with non-gaussian perturbations, Ann

    R. Sowers, Large deviations for a reaction-diffusion equation with non-gaussian perturbations, Ann. Probab., 20 (1992) 504-537

    1992

  54. [59]

    Silvestre, Regularity of the obstacle problem for a fractional power of the laplace operator, Commun

    L. Silvestre, Regularity of the obstacle problem for a fractional power of the laplace operator, Commun. Pure Appl. Math, 60 (2007) 67-112

    2007

  55. [60]

    Servadei, E

    R. Servadei, E. Valdinoci, The Brezis-Nirenberg result for the fractional Laplacian, Tran. Amer. Math. Soc., 367(1) (2015) 67-102. 43

    2015

  56. [61]

    Villani, Topics in optimal transportation, vol

    C. Villani, Topics in optimal transportation, vol. 58 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003

    2003

  57. [62]

    Wang, Attractors for reaction-diffusion equations in unbounded domains, Phys

    B. Wang, Attractors for reaction-diffusion equations in unbounded domains, Phys. D 128 (1999) 41-52

    1999

  58. [63]

    Wang, Asymptotic behavior of stochastic wave equations with critical exponents onR 3, Tran

    B. Wang, Asymptotic behavior of stochastic wave equations with critical exponents onR 3, Tran. Amer. Math. Soc. 363 (2011) 3639-3663

    2011

  59. [64]

    Wang, Well-Posedness and long term behavior of supercritical wave equations driven by nonlinear colored Noise onR n, Journal of Functional Analysis, 283 (2022) 109498

    B. Wang, Well-Posedness and long term behavior of supercritical wave equations driven by nonlinear colored Noise onR n, Journal of Functional Analysis, 283 (2022) 109498

    2022

  60. [65]

    Wang, Dynamics of fractional stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded domains driven by non- linear noise, J

    B. Wang, Dynamics of fractional stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded domains driven by non- linear noise, J. Differential Equations, 268 (2019) 1-59

    2019

  61. [66]

    Wang, Large deviations of fractional stochastic equations with non-Lipschitz drift and multiplicative noise on unbounded domains, J

    B. Wang, Large deviations of fractional stochastic equations with non-Lipschitz drift and multiplicative noise on unbounded domains, J. Differential Equations, 376 (2023) 1-38

    2023

  62. [67]

    Wang, Uniform large deviation principles of fractional reaction-diffusion equations driven by superlinear ulmtiplicative noise onR n, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08722

    B. Wang, Uniform large deviation principles of fractional reaction-diffusion equations driven by superlinear ulmtiplicative noise onR n, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08722

    2024 arXiv

  63. [68]

    X. Wang, K. Lu, B. Wang, Wong-Zakai approximations and attractors for stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded domains, J. Differential Equations, 264 (2018) 378-424

    2018

  64. [69]

    R. Wang, L. Shi, B. Wang, Asymptotic behavior of fractional nonclassical diffusion equations driven by nonlinear colored noise onR N , Nonlinearity, 32 (2019) 4524-4556

    2019

  65. [70]

    R. Wang, B. Guo, B. Wang, Well-posedness and dynamics of fractional FitzHugh-Nagumo systems onR N driven by nonlinear noise, Sci China Math., 64 (2021) 2395-2436

    2021

  66. [72]

    R. Wang, B. Wang, Random dynamics of non-autonomous fractional stochasticp-Laplacian equations onR N , Banach J. Math. Anal., 15 (2021) 1-42

    2021

  67. [73]

    R. Wang, B. Wang, Asymptotic behavior of non-autonomous fractionalp-Laplacian equations driven by additive noise on unbounded domains, Bull. Math. Sci., 11 (2020) 205002

    2020

  68. [76]

    R. Wang, B. Guo, W. Liu, D.T. Nguyen, Fractal dimension of random invariant sets and regular random attractors for stochastic hydrodynamical equations, Mathematische Annalen, 389(1) (2024) 671-718

    2024

  69. [77]

    J. Xu, T. Caraballo, Long time behavior of stochastic nonlocal partial differential equations and wong-zakai approximations, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 54 (2022) 2792-2844

    2022

  70. [78]

    J. Xu, T. Caraballo, J. Valero. Dynamics and large deviations for fractional Stochastic partial differential equa- tions with L´ evy noise, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 56 (2024) 1016-1067

    2024

  71. [79]

    Zeidler, Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Applications II/B: Nonlinear Monotone operators, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1990

    E. Zeidler, Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Applications II/B: Nonlinear Monotone operators, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1990. 44

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.