Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 39 references

Shape-Transition in Non-Euclidean Ribbons

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Rough prestrains in elastic ribbons produce a shape transition: narrow minimizers match the reference bending, wide minimizers deviate when the reference form is Gauss-incompatible.

desk verdict Solid narrow-ribbon Γ-limit with a real wide-ribbon gap: the abstract overstates what is proven for generic prestrains. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22593 v1 pith:DPBN7RLX submitted 2026-06-10 math.AP math.DG

Noam Shalev This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.DG MSC 49J4574K1074K2074G65
keywords shapetransitionthinelasticribbonsprestrainGamma-convergencenon-Euclideanelasticitysecondfundamentalformdimensionreductionrough
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives one-dimensional variational limits for thin elastic ribbons whose internal prestrain is rough (L∞, piecewise-constant across the thickness), starting from three-dimensional nonlinear elasticity via Γ-convergence. It claims that in the narrow-ribbon regime (thickness squared negligible compared to width), the limiting energy is minimized exactly when the ribbon's second fundamental form along the midline equals the reference second fundamental form set by the prestrain. In the wide-ribbon regime (width shrinks after thickness), the limiting energy contains an extra determinant penalty, so minimizers deviate from the reference form whenever that reference form has nonzero determinant — i.e., is Gauss-incompatible with a Euclidean embedding. This proves rigorously a shape-transition phenomenon observed in experiments, and extends prior smooth-prestrain results to physically relevant rough (e.g., multi-layer) geometries. A positive excess energy shows the natural energy scaling is order t.

What carries the argument

The argument rides on a structure theorem for the scaled limiting strain of finite-energy configurations: the 2×2 leading block of the scaled strain has the form x3·II + a matrix whose (1,1)-component is affine in x2 (equivalently, ∂₂²G₁₁=0). This structure, combined with orthogonal projections onto subspaces of matrix fields adapted to the ribbon geometry, yields the reference second fundamental form IĪ and the excess energy C_excess. The wide-ribbon limit is obtained by first taking a plate limit (Γ-convergence to a Kirchhoff-type bending energy) and then letting the width go to zero, where the Gauss equation det II=0 forces the determinant penalty terms with constants α±_Q.

What would settle it

Compute the wide-ribbon Γ-limit for a prestrain B whose (2,2)-component depends on x₂ (so P₂(II)≠IĪ). If a recovery sequence can be built that matches the lower bound including a new term, the shape-transition picture changes; if no such sequence exists, the structural assumption is essential. Alternatively, in an experiment, take a bilayered ribbon with Gauss-incompatible reference form and vary aspect ratio; measuring the midline second fundamental form in the wide regime would confirm deviation, while in the narrow regime it should match the reference form.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the rough-prestrain ribbon energy, scaled by t², Γ-converges to two different one-dimensional theories depending on the relative vanishing of width and thickness. For narrow ribbons (w²≪t), the Γ-limit is I0(II)=1/24∫ Q2(II–IĪ) dx1 + C_excess, whose unique minimizer is II=IĪ, the reference second fundamental form. For wide ribbons, after iterating the limits, the Γ-limit is J0(II)=1/24∫ [Q2(II–IĪ)+α+_Q(det II)⁺+α⁻_Q(det II)⁻] dx1 + C_excess, so whenever det IĪ≠0 the minimizer satisfies |II_min−IĪ|≥c|κ₁|>0 and differs from the reference form. The difference is driven by the determinant penalty terms, which encode the Gauss constraint that a limiting surface'

Load-bearing premise

The wide-ribbon result is proven only when the reference bending does not vary with the width coordinate after projection, and its recovery sequence is imported from a prior paper; without that condition the wide-regime limit is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the narrow regime, the bending minimizer is exactly the reference second fundamental form, so rough-prestrain ribbons of this geometry do not show shape transitions.
  • In the wide regime, Gauss-incompatible reference forms (det IĪ≠0) force the midline second fundamental form of minimizers to differ from the reference form by a definite amount, proving a shape transition.
  • Generically, the excess energy C_excess is positive, which establishes that the natural energy scaling is ε∼t for rough prestrains (as for non-Euclidean plates and rods), not the lower scalings possible for smooth prestrains.
  • For prestrains of bilayered or piecewise-constant form, C_excess is positive, so the result applies to many experimental multi-layer geometries.
  • The compactness statements imply approximate minimizers of the 3D energies converge to minimizers of the derived 1D theories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The determinant-penalty mechanism suggests a selection principle: in wide ribbons the Gauss constraint acts as a hard constraint on the limiting shape, while narrow ribbons evade it; this could be tested by comparing measured midline curvatures of ribbons cut from the same prestrain field but with different width-to-thickness ratios.
  • A natural extension would be to relax the structural assumption P₂(II)=IĪ: one expects the lower bound to hold without it, and the missing piece is a recovery sequence; a counterexample with x2-dependent II22 might reveal whether the limiting energy gains an additional term.
  • The excess energy decomposition identifies the part of the prestrain that is not simultaneously 'bendable' and 'stretchable'; in materials design, tuning B to make C_excess vanish could suppress shape transitions and yield configuration-independent bending.
  • The same Γ-convergence framework could be pushed to the intermediate regime w²∼t, which the paper notes is open, to see whether the transition is sharp or smeared over a range of aspect ratios.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives one-dimensional Γ-limits for prestrained ribbons with rough prestrain of the form P_{t,w}^{-1}=I+tB(x_1,x_2/w,x_3/t)+o(t), B∈L^∞, starting from three-dimensional nonlinear elasticity. In the narrow regime w^2≪t, Theorem 5.1 proves compactness and Γ-convergence to I_0(–II)=(1/24)∫Q_2(–II−–II)dx_1+C_excess, with explicit formulas for the reference second fundamental form, excess energy, and reference geodesic curvature; the minimizer is –II=–II. In the wide regime, Theorem 6.4 derives a lower bound and a conditional Γ-limit J_0 with a Gauss-incompatibility penalty α^+_Q(det –II)^++α^-_Q(det –II)^-, asserting a shape transition. The wide-recovery statement, however, is proved only under the structural assumption P_2(II)=–II. The paper also contains a plate-limit adaptation from [PG22] in Appendix B and diagonalization arguments in Appendix A.

Significance. If the narrow-ribbon theorem is taken as the main contribution, this is a solid and useful piece of dimension reduction: the formulas for C_excess, –II, and κ_g are explicit in W and B, the proof of Theorem 5.1 is essentially self-contained (compactness via FJM02/FMP12, the MM25 structure lemma, Jensen lower bound, ODE-frame recovery, and diagonalization), and no parameter is fitted. The wide-ribbon result is genuinely conditional: it gives a sharp 1D functional only when P_2(II)=–II, and the abstract's phrase 'generically not the case' is not supported by the theorem as stated. The paper would be publishable if the conditional nature of the wide leg is made prominent and the overreach in the abstract/introduction is corrected.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; §1.2; Theorem 6.4(ii)] The wide-ribbon shape-transition claim is not established for general B. Theorem 6.4(ii) requires P_2(II)=–II, and for B with genuinely x_2-dependent II_{22} the displayed J_0 is not the Γ-limit. For example, take Q_2=|·|^2, α^±_Q as in (6.4), and B=-x_3 diag(1, η x_2). Then (4.4) gives II=diag(1, ηx_2), –II=diag(1,0), and P_2(II)≠–II. A cylinder with II_y=diag(1,0) has J_w=(1/24)∫|diag(1,0)−diag(1,ηx_2)|^2 dx'=η^2/288, while J_0(–II)=0. Thus the lower bound of Theorem 6.4(i) is not attained and no recovery sequence can realize J_0. The abstract's 'generically' therefore asserts more than is proved, and the claim fails for this simple B. The authors should either state the wide result as conditional, prove a counterexample/negative result for the general case, or qualify the abstract accordingly.
  2. [Theorem 6.4(ii), §6] The recovery-sequence proof is not supplied; it is delegated to [MM25, Proof of Theorem 5.6]. That reference assumes B is independent of x_2, so P_2(II)=–II holds automatically. The present assumption P_2(II)=–II is a different, weaker condition, and it is not immediate that the construction extends verbatim. Since the whole wide leg of the shape-transition claim rests on this recovery step, the manuscript should either reproduce the adapted construction and verify all hypotheses, or explicitly mark it as an open problem and remove the corresponding claims from the abstract and introduction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (5.9)–(5.10)] The two occurrences of 'I I' in (5.9) refer to different objects: the associated second fundamental form on the left and the reference form on the right. As printed, the identity is not correct. Please disambiguate the notation (e.g., use A for the associated form and R for the reference form) and write the first term on the right as A−P_2(R), with cross terms justified by orthogonality.
  2. [§6, Theorem 6.4] The paper uses both C^{(0)}_{excess} (the plate-level excess energy in Theorem 6.2) and C_excess (the wide-ribbon excess energy in (6.3)). The passage from one to the other in the proof of Theorem 6.4(i) is not explained; a sentence clarifying that the difference is exactly the P_2-projection term would help.
  3. [Abstract] Even if the authors choose to keep the wide result conditional, the abstract should not say 'for wide ribbons this is generically not the case' without at least a parenthetical qualification pointing to the structural assumption. As it stands, the abstract overstates the theorem.
  4. [Various] Minor typos and presentation issues: 'straight forward' (p. 17), the subscript/superscript formatting around eKn_3 in the proof of Theorem 5.1, and the repeated use of 'I I' for different tensors in Section 5 make the already dense notation harder to follow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the limit functionals are derived from the 3D stored energy with explicit formulas in W and B; the wide-regime limitation is an honest gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a Γ-convergence analysis starting from the 3D elastic energy (3.2) with inputs W and B. The limiting functionals I0 and J0, the reference second fundamental form, the excess energy, and the constants α± are all given by explicit formulas in terms of W and B (Definitions 4.2, equations (4.3)–(4.6), (6.3)), with no fitted parameters. The narrow-ribbon theorem (Theorem 5.1) is proved in full: the lower bound follows from compactness, the scaled limiting strain structure, and Jensen's inequality; the upper bound is a constructive recovery sequence. The identity that the minimizer of I0 is –II = –II is a direct consequence of the form of the quadratic functional, not an input disguised as an output. The wide-ribbon analysis is conditional: the paper explicitly states in Section 6 that the recovery sequence is proved only under P2(II) = –II, and in Section 1.3 that x2-dependence of the (2,2)-component prevents matching the lower bound with a recovery sequence. This is a stated limitation rather than a circular step, and the abstract's 'generically' is broader than the proven theorem — a correctness/overclaim issue, not circularity. Reliance on [MM25], [FHMP16], and [PG22] is external technical support: Lemma 4.6 is re-proved in the text, while Lemma 4.5 and the wide recovery are cited from prior work by other authors with stated assumptions; these are not self-citations of the present author, nor do they smuggle in the target result. No step reduces to an earlier equation by construction, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing claim is justified solely by a self-citation. Hence the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The center of the derivation is the 3D stored energy functional; nothing is fitted to experimental data. Inputs are the energy density W (with standard constitutive assumptions) and the prestrain field B; all outputs (–II, C_excess, κ_g, I₀, J₀) are explicit formulas in W and B. The load-bearing unproved inputs are: standard elasticity hypotheses, the FJM02 rigidity estimate, the MM25 scaled-strain structure theorem (reproduced here as Lemma 4.6), FMP12 compactness lemmas, the PG22 plate Γ-convergence used in Appendix B, and FHMP16 Proposition 9. The wide-regime theorem additionally requires the structural hypothesis P₂(II)=–II, which is the paper's own restriction rather than a standard assumption. No invented entities are added: the reference second fundamental form and excess energy are outputs of the stored energy, not new postulates.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Hyperelastic energy density W satisfies: C² near SO(3), zero exactly on SO(3), C·dist² coercivity, frame indifference (§2.2.1).
    The entire Γ-convergence analysis is built on this constitutive frame; the quadratic expansion Q₃ enters every limit functional.
  • domain assumption Prestrain structure (1.1): P_{t,w}^{-1} = I + tB(x₁,x₂/w,x₃/t) + o(t) uniformly, with B∈L^∞(Ω_{1,1}; R^{3×3}_sym).
    This is the class of rough prestrains targeted; the paper motivates it by multi-layer examples but does not derive it from a finer swelling/plasticity model.
  • standard math Friesecke–James–Müller geometric rigidity estimate [FJM02].
    Invoked as a black box in the compactness lemmas (4.3, 4.7) and the lower-bound machinery.
  • standard math Scaled-limiting-strain structure theorem: ∂₂²G₁₁=0, giving (4.21) (credited to [MM25, Lemma 4.8]).
    Re-proved in this text as Lemma 4.6; it is the backbone of the narrow-ribbon functional I₀.
  • ad hoc to paper Wide-ribbon structural assumption: P₂(II)=–II, i.e., the projected reference second fundamental form is independent of x₂.
    Imposed in §6 solely to make the recovery sequence work; without it the wide-regime Γ-convergence is unproven, constraining the genericity of the shape-transition claim.
  • domain assumption Iterated-limit scheme for wide ribbons (first t→0, then w→0) and double-limit w²≪t for narrow ribbons.
    The shape-transition comparison is made between these two chosen asymptotic paths; footnote 1 states other double limits (w²≳t) remain open.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Shape-Transition in Non-Euclidean Ribbons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DPBN7RLX

@misc{pith2026260722593,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Shape-Transition in Non-Euclidean Ribbons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DPBN7RLX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22593}
}
abstract

Ribbons are thin elastic bodies whose thickness $t$ is much smaller than their width $w$, which is in turn much smaller than their length. Starting from a three-dimensional model, we derive a one-dimensional limit theory for ribbons with rough prestrain, by means of $\Gamma$-convergence. Our model shows that for narrow ribbons, the energy minimizer coincides with the reference (effective) second fundamental form along the midline, while for wide ribbons this is generically not the case. This proves the existence of shape-transitions in such ribbons, as observed in many experiments, generalizing recent results by Maor & Mora to rough prestrains, which more accurately model many of the relevant physical systems. Our analysis combines techniques from the study of Euclidean ribbons due to Freddi et al., the work of Schmidt on dimension reduction of prestrained plates, and a new structure theorem on the scaled limiting strain due to Maor & Mora.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22593 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A prototypical example of an experimentally observed shape-transition (figure adapted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Elasticity and Fluctuations of Frustrated Nanoribbons , volume=

    Grossman, Doron and Sharon, Eran and Diamant, Haim , year=. Elasticity and Fluctuations of Frustrated Nanoribbons , volume=. Physical Review Letters , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.258105 , number=

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.258105

  2. [2]

    , journal =

    Kirchhoff, G. , journal =. Über das Gleichgewicht und die Bewegung einer elastischen Scheibe. , url =

  3. [3]

    Shape and fluctuations of frustrated self-assembled nano ribbons , volume =

    Zhang, Mingming and Grossman, Doron and Danino, Dganit and Sharon, Eran , year =. Shape and fluctuations of frustrated self-assembled nano ribbons , volume =. Nature Communications , doi =

  4. [4]

    1927 , publisher=

    A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity , author=. 1927 , publisher=

    1927

  5. [5]

    Kupferman, Raz and Solomon, Jake P. , year=. A. Journal of Functional Analysis , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2013.09.003 , number=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2013.09.003 2013

  6. [6]

    Limits of Distributed Dislocations in Geometric and Constitutive Paradigms , ISBN =

    Epstein, Marcelo and Kupferman, Raz and Maor, Cy , year =. Limits of Distributed Dislocations in Geometric and Constitutive Paradigms , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42683-5_8 , booktitle =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42683-5_8

  7. [7]

    On material-uniform elastic bodies with disclinations and their homogenization , ISSN =

    Maor, Cy , year =. On material-uniform elastic bodies with disclinations and their homogenization , ISSN =. doi:10.1177/10812865251322412 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1177/10812865251322412

  8. [8]

    Hierarchy of geometrical frustration in elastic ribbons: Shape-transitions and energy scaling obtained from a general asymptotic theory , volume=

    Levin, Ido and Siéfert, Emmanuel and Sharon, Eran and Maor, Cy , year=. Hierarchy of geometrical frustration in elastic ribbons: Shape-transitions and energy scaling obtained from a general asymptotic theory , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104579 , journal=

    arXiv 2021

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    and Haataja, Mikko , year =

    Chen, Zi and Majidi, Carmel and Srolovitz, D.J. and Haataja, Mikko , year =

  2. [10]

    Plates with Incompatible Prestrain , volume =

    Bhattacharya, Kaushik and Lewicka, Marta and Sch\". Plates with Incompatible Prestrain , volume =. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , publisher =. 2016 , month = jan, pages =. doi:10.1007/s00205-015-0958-7 , number =

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    On the Bending and Twisting of Rods with Misfit , volume =

    Kohn, Robert and O’Brien, Ethan , year =. On the Bending and Twisting of Rods with Misfit , volume =. Journal of Elasticity , doi =

  4. [12]

    2021 , month =

    Si\'efert, Emmanuel and Levin, Ido and Sharon, Eran , journal =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011062 , url =

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    and Müller, Stefan , title =

    Friesecke, Gero and James, Richard D. and Müller, Stefan , title =. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , volume =. 2002 , number =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.10048 , url =

    2002 doi

  6. [14]

    A Hierarchy of Plate Models Derived from Nonlinear Elasticity by Gamma-Convergence , volume =

    Friesecke, Gero and James, Richard and Müller, Stefan , year =. A Hierarchy of Plate Models Derived from Nonlinear Elasticity by Gamma-Convergence , volume =. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , doi =

  7. [15]

    2025 , eprint=

    Rigorous analysis of shape transitions in frustrated elastic ribbons , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  8. [16]

    10.1051/cocv/2018046

    Heterogeneous elastic plates with in-plane modulation of the target curvature and applications to thin gel sheets , DOI= "10.1051/cocv/2018046", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2018046", journal =

  9. [17]

    Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , volume =

    Lewicka, Marta and Lučić, Danka , title =. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21871 , url =. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cpa.21871 , year =

    doi

  10. [18]

    On the Role of Curvature in the Elastic Energy of Non-

    Maor, Cy and Shachar, Asaf , year =. On the Role of Curvature in the Elastic Energy of Non-. Journal of Elasticity , doi =

  11. [19]

    Science , volume =

    Shahaf Armon and Efi Efrati and Raz Kupferman and Eran Sharon , title =. Science , volume =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  12. [20]

    Journal of Nonlinear Science , volume=

    The membrane shell model in nonlinear elasticity: a variational asymptotic derivation , author=. Journal of Nonlinear Science , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  13. [21]

    Derivation of the nonlinear bending-torsion theory for inextensible rods by -convergence , volume =

    Mora, Maria Giovanna and Müller, Stefan , year =. Derivation of the nonlinear bending-torsion theory for inextensible rods by -convergence , volume =. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations , doi =

  14. [22]

    ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations , pages =

    Lewicka, Marta and Pakzad, Mohammad Reza , title =. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations , pages =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  15. [23]

    Plate theory for stressed heterogeneous multilayers of finite bending energy , journal =

    Bernd Schmidt , keywords =. Plate theory for stressed heterogeneous multilayers of finite bending energy , journal =. 2007 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2007.04.011 , url =

    2007 doi

  16. [24]

    Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences , volume =

    Freddi, Lorenzo and Mora, Maria Giovanna and Paroni, Roberto , title =. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  17. [25]

    SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , volume =

    Freddi, Lorenzo and Hornung, Peter and Mora, Maria Giovanna and Paroni, Roberto , title =. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  18. [26]

    Theorie der elastisch biegsamen undehnbaren B

    Sadowsky, M , journal=. Theorie der elastisch biegsamen undehnbaren B

  19. [27]

    A Corrected Sadowsky Functional for Inextensible Elastic Ribbons , volume =

    Freddi, Lorenzo and Hornung, Peter and Mora, Maria and Paroni, Roberto , year =. A Corrected Sadowsky Functional for Inextensible Elastic Ribbons , volume =. Journal of Elasticity , doi =

  20. [28]

    2023 , publisher=

    Maor, Cy , title =. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  21. [29]

    2023 , publisher=

    Lewicka, Marta , title =. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  22. [30]

    , title =

    Antman, Stuart S. , title =. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  23. [31]

    , title =

    Ciarlet, P.G. , title =. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  24. [32]

    Nonlinear Thin-Walled Beams With a Rectangular Cross-Section —

    Freddi, Lorenzo and Mora, Maria Giovanna and Paroni, Roberto. Nonlinear Thin-Walled Beams With a Rectangular Cross-Section —. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences , volume =. 2013 , doi =. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202512500595 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    Mora, M. G. and Müller, S. , title=. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics , year=. doi:10.1017/S0308210506001120 , number=

    doi

  26. [34]

    Braides and I

    A. Braides and I. Fonseca and G. Francfort , journal =

  27. [35]

    Annales de l'I.H.P

    Lewicka, Marta and Raoult, Annie and Ricciotti, Diego , title =. Annales de l'I.H.P. Analyse non lin\'eaire , pages =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  28. [36]

    A Homogenized Bending Theory for Prestrained Plates , volume=

    Böhnlein, Klaus and Neukamm, Stefan and Padilla-Garza, David and Sander, Oliver , year=. A Homogenized Bending Theory for Prestrained Plates , volume=. Journal of Nonlinear Science , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s00332-022-09869-8 , number=

    doi

  29. [37]

    Derivation of a homogenized nonlinear plate theory from 3d elasticity , volume =

    Hornung, Peter and Neukamm, Stefan and Velčić, Igor , year =. Derivation of a homogenized nonlinear plate theory from 3d elasticity , volume =. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations , publisher =. doi:10.1007/s00526-013-0691-8 , number =

    doi

  30. [38]

    On global and local minimizers of prestrained thin elastic rods , volume =

    Cicalese, Marco and Ruf, Matthias and Solombrino, Francesco , year =. On global and local minimizers of prestrained thin elastic rods , volume =. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations , publisher =. doi:10.1007/s00526-017-1197-6 , number =

    doi

  31. [39]

    Dimension reduction through gamma convergence for general prestrained thin elastic sheets , volume =

    Padilla-Garza, David , year =. Dimension reduction through gamma convergence for general prestrained thin elastic sheets , volume =. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations , publisher =. doi:10.1007/s00526-022-02262-z , number =

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.