Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 10 minor 61 references

Plateau's Problem via covering spaces

T0 review · 1 major / 10 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Soap-film minimizers spanning a wire exist as projections of perimeter-minimizing fundamental domains in all normal covers of the complement, and a single normal cover realizes the global least area among them.

desk verdict Solid GMT extension of Brakke to infinite normal covers with a real compactness theorem; one unwritten genericity lemma sits on the attainment path but is almost certainly fixable. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23703 v1 pith:XZMWZEYZ submitted 2026-07-26 math.DG math.AP

James Tissot This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.AP MSC 49Q0553A1057M1049Q20
keywords PlateauproblemsoapfilmscoveringspacesfundamentaldomainsH-domains(M0∞)-minimalsetstriplejunctionsnormalsubgroups
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The classical Plateau problem seeks a least-area surface spanning a given closed wire. Soap films observed in nature allow triple junctions and tetrahedral singularities, which ordinary area-minimizing currents often exclude. Brakke showed that, for each finite-index subgroup of the fundamental group of space minus the wire, one can minimize perimeter among fundamental domains in the corresponding covering space and project the boundary back down to obtain a soap-film-type minimizer. This paper extends that construction to every normal subgroup, including those of infinite index, by working with H-domains in the universal cover. A compactness theorem then produces one proper normal fully spanning subgroup whose projected minimizer has the smallest area among all such constructions. The resulting surfaces are shown to be (M,0,∞)-minimal, to span the wire in the homotopical sense dictated by the subgroup, and in special double and triple covers to enjoy extra regularity or comparison properties against smooth or triple-junction competitors.

What carries the argument

H-domains: subsets of the universal cover that are invariant under a normal subgroup H and tessellate in the transverse directions of the quotient group; their perimeter is measured only on a fundamental sheet of the quotient, allowing a single compactness theorem that lets both the domain and the subgroup vary.

What would settle it

Exhibit a normal fully spanning cover in which every perimeter-minimizing fundamental domain projects to a surface whose area is strictly larger than the area of some (M,0,∞)-minimal set that spans modulo another normal fully spanning subgroup, or produce a sequence of H-domains whose perimeters approach the claimed infimum but whose limit fails to be an H-domain for any proper normal H.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For every non-trivial normal covering space of R³ minus a smooth link Γ there exists a perimeter-minimizing fundamental domain whose projected reduced boundary is a positive-area (M,0,∞)-minimal set that homotopically spans Γ modulo the corresponding normal subgroup and minimizes area among all such spanning (M,0,∞)-minimal sets; moreover a compactness result on H-domains yields one proper normal fully spanning subgroup realizing the global infimum of these areas.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument relies on the covering spaces being normal, so that deck transformations act transitively on fibres and fundamental domains can be defined and reassembled without overlap.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every normal cover of the complement of a smooth link yields at least one soap-film-type area minimizer spanning the link modulo that cover.
  • There is a single normal fully spanning cover whose projected minimizer has globally least area among all such projected minimizers.
  • In the unique double cover the projected minimizer is a smooth surface with boundary the knot and is area-minimizing among all smooth spanning surfaces.
  • In the cyclic triple cover the projected minimizer has no interior tetrahedral points and beats every compact oriented surface with only finitely many oriented triple junctions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Whether the global least-area cover can always be chosen of finite degree remains open and would simplify numerical search for the absolute soap-film minimizer.
  • Dropping normality would capture partially wetting films, but requires a different notion of fundamental domain that the present compactness does not supply.
  • The same H-domain compactness may apply verbatim to other geometric variational problems on covering spaces of non-compact manifolds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 10 minor

Summary. The paper develops Brakke's 1995 covering-space formulation of Plateau's problem in two directions. First, for any non-trivial normal subgroup H of G = π₁(R³ \ Γ) — including infinite-index ones — it proves existence of a perimeter-minimizing fundamental domain D in the associated cover (Theorem 1.1), and shows the projected boundary Σ_H(D) = p(∂*D) is a positive-area (M,0,∞)-minimal set that homotopically spans Γ modulo H and minimizes area among all such sets. Second, lifting fundamental domains to H-invariant "H-domains" in the universal cover, it proves a compactness/LSC theorem (Theorem 4.5) for sequences where both the set and the subgroup vary, and deduces that the infimum of Area(Σ_H) over normal fully spanning H is attained (Theorem 1.2, Corollary 1.3), plus a variant à la De Lellis–Ghiraldin–Maggi (Corollary 1.6) and refined statements for the double and cyclic triple covers (Proposition 1.4). The compactness technology adapts the concentration-compactness line of [NPST22; CN24] to an unbounded base, with the group convergence handled via the product topology on 2^{π₁(M)}.

Significance. If the gap identified below (assumption (17)) is closed, the paper is a solid and well-positioned contribution to the GMT literature on soap films. Its strengths are concrete: a canonical, parameter-free variational construction — given only Γ, it produces for every normal cover an (M,0,∞)-minimal spanning set with an explicit minimality property, and a least-area representative across all fully spanning normal covers; an honest delineation of the normality restriction (Proposition 1.5 shows partial wetting genuinely requires non-normal covers); and proofs written in standard, checkable GMT detail (reduced-boundary bookkeeping in Proposition 3.6, a clean relative isoperimetric inequality on solid tori in Appendix A, and a careful separation-of-pieces argument in Lemmas 4.6-4.7). The cross-cover attainment result (Theorem 1.2/Corollary 1.3) appears to be new and is not subsumed by [DGM17], which minimizes over all closed sets in a spanning class rather than selecting among cover-induced minimizers. The open questions stated in §1.1 (non-normal covers, finite-degree attainment) are well chosen and the paper is likely to be useful to the community working on covering-space and cluster

major comments (1)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (17)-(18); Corollaries 4.8-4.9] The equality (18), P(F, \cup_{gH} gR) = P(D), rests on assumption (17), P(E, R) = P(E, closure(R)) for the relevant sets E, i.e. on the perimeter measure |mu_E| not charging the sheet boundary \partial R (the lift of the cone \Sigma_0). The text acknowledges (17) is false as stated and asserts (p. 20-21) that one can always modify the vertex of \Sigma_0 so that (17) holds for any countable collection of sets of locally finite perimeter. No proof or reference is given. This is load-bearing, not cosmetic: without (17), the chain in Proposition 3.11 yields P(F, \cup gR) = P(D) - |mu_D|(union of sheet boundaries), and Corollaries 4.8-4.9 then conclude only P(D) <= I + |mu_D|(boundary charge), so the attainment P(D) = I — hence Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 and Corollaries 1.3/1.6 — is not deduced from the lower-semicontinuity output of Theorem 4.5. Two things are needed. (a) A proof of the genericity
minor comments (10)
  1. [§6, Proposition 1.4] Proposition 1.4 is stated as a proposition but the text provides only an 'Idea of proof' and explicitly forgoes the technical details (multiplicity-one convergence to the blowup, the boundary regularity via [All75], the mod-3 homology computation of the avoiding group). Since the result is advertised in the introduction, it should either be proved in full (e.g., in an appendix) or reclassified as a remark/conjecture-level statement.
  2. [§6, Theorem 1.2] Theorem 1.2 applies Corollary 4.9 to the collection of fully spanning normal subgroups; closedness under the convergence of Definition 4.1 is checked, but non-emptiness of this collection is never verified. A one-line observation suffices (e.g., the commutator subgroup contains no meridian since meridians are non-trivial in H_1(M) = Z^m).
  3. [§3.2-3.3] In Corollary 3.8 and in the discussion of (17), the word 'generic' for the vertex x_0 should be quantified precisely (full H^3-measure, residual, etc.), particularly since two different genericity requirements on x_0 must hold simultaneously.
  4. [§4, Propositions 4.3-4.4] The proof of Proposition 4.3(ii) as written appears garbled ('It follows directly that lim A_k >= A. If g not in A... g is never eventually in A_k. But A_k converges so g must eventually not be in A_k'); please rewrite for clarity. Similarly, in Proposition 4.4 the symbol G is reused for two different sets (the liminf set and its augmentation); renaming would help the reader follow the diagonal argument.
  5. [§3.2, Proposition 3.9] The lower bound eta in Proposition 3.9 depends on the cover (through the order N of [\xi] and the constant c(1/2\kappa_N) of Proposition A.1). This is harmless for the applications — Corollary 4.9 needs no uniform-in-H lower bound — but a sentence saying so would prevent misreading, since the cross-cover minimization in Section 6 might naively seem to require uniformity.
  6. [§4, Lemma 4.6, Step 1] In (30)-(31) the isoperimetric inequality |E|^{2/3} <= P(E) is applied to the intersections F^{i,j}_k \cap B_i; please cite the precise statement being used (perimeter of the intersection, with the slicing estimate already accounted for in the displayed computation).
  7. [§3.3, Proposition 3.11] In the displayed chain of Proposition 3.11, the reason 'the first equality holds because R is open and a fundamental domain' should also note that the sheets gR are pairwise disjoint (up to the shared boundaries, which is exactly the (17) issue), to make the logic of the four equalities transparent.
  8. [§5, Proposition 5.1] Footnote 7 (p. 31) recalls that D is modified by an H^3-null set so that \partial^*D = \partial D; please comment on the compatibility of this modification with the openness of D(Σ,H) used in Proposition 3.2 (e.g., that openness is only used where the unmodified representative is available).
  9. [§1.2, §6] Example 1.2.3 (the infinite spiral) is used as motivation but the boundary curve is not smooth; the caveat is present but could be moved earlier so the reader does not take the example as evidence within the paper's hypotheses. Figure 2 is explicitly schematic ('shows' in quotes); acceptable given the idea-of-proof status of Proposition 1.4, but should be tightened if that proposition is completed.
  10. [Throughout] Rendering: in the arXiv v1 text, equation (17) appears with the closure bar on the second R easy to miss, and several accented 'lifted-point' symbols (\tilde x, \tilde B) are inconsistently typeset; a notation table or consistent choice would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: existence and infimum attainment are variational GMT statements, not reductions of fitted inputs or self-defined targets.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is: define fundamental domains / H-domains (Defs. 3.1, 3.4); prove compactness and LSC for sequences of H-domains with varying normal subgroups (Thm. 4.5, Lemmas 4.6–4.7) via concentration-compactness style reassembly under deck actions; obtain perimeter minimizers in each normal cover and across closed families of normal subgroups (Cors. 4.8–4.9); project and verify spanning, (M,0,∞)-minimality, and comparison via lifting (Props. 5.1, 5.3–5.5, 3.7). None of these steps defines the target area in terms of itself, fits a free parameter to the claimed infimum, or imports a uniqueness theorem from the same author. Background citations (Taylor regularity, Maggi BV, Brakke, NPST22/CN24) supply external tools with stated hypotheses independent of the paper’s infimum. The technical genericity claim (17) used in Prop. 3.11 is an unproven but non-circular gap (correctness risk), not a by-construction reduction of the main theorems. Fully-spanning and homotopic spanning are filters on competitors, not self-definitions of the minimizer. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The work sits on standard covering-space Galois correspondence, De Giorgi sets of finite perimeter, Almgren (M,0,∞)-minimality and Taylor regularity, and concentration-compactness ideas adapted from isoperimetric cluster/lattice literature. No numerical free parameters. Invented structure is definitional (H-domains, fully spanning, projected boundary Σ_H(D)) rather than new physical entities. Load-bearing modeling choice is normality of covers.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Path-connected normal covers of M=R³\Gamma are classified by normal subgroups H of π1(M); deck(p)≅π1(M)/H acts by isometries (Hatcher).
    Used throughout §2.4 and to define fM(H) and fundamental domains.
  • standard math Taylor regularity: (M,0,∞)-minimal sets are smooth surfaces away from triple junctions (120°) and tetrahedral singularities.
    Invoked for competitor regularity in proofs of Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.3 (via Prop. 3.7(ii)) and for Prop. 1.4.
  • standard math Standard GMT: De Giorgi structure, LSC of perimeter, compactness of sets of locally finite perimeter, area formula/BV pushforwards (Maggi/AFP).
    Foundation of §2.6 and all perimeter arguments including Prop. 5.5 deformation.
  • domain assumption Γ is a finite union of smooth (or at least C^{1}/C^{1,α}) closed curves so that M is a tame link complement and Allard boundary tools apply where needed.
    Setup §2.2 and footnote on regularity; needed for finite Wirtinger generation and boundary blow-ups in Prop. 1.4.
  • ad hoc to paper Fundamental domains and H-domains are defined measure-theoretically via deck orbits; normality is required for the robust definition and overlap-free reassembly.
    Definitions 3.1 and 3.4; authors flag non-normal case as open/essential for some examples (§1.1).
  • standard math Relative isoperimetric inequality on solid tori (Appendix A) giving uniform positive lower bound on perimeter of non-trivial fundamental domains (Prop. 3.9).
    Adaptation of Maggi-type relative isoperimetry; used to exclude zero-area triviality.
invented entities (3)
  • H-domain in the universal cover independent evidence
    purpose: Unify fundamental domains of all normal covers as subsets of one fixed space so that both the set and the subgroup H can vary in the compactness theorem.
    Definition 3.4; correspondence Prop. 3.5. Definitional device, not a physical postulate; independent mathematical content is the compactness theorem built on it.
  • Fully spanning normal subgroup (contains no meridians) independent evidence
    purpose: Exclude films that attach to only some components of a multi-component Γ when minimizing area across covers.
    Introduced before Theorem 1.2; closed under the paper’s subgroup convergence. Modeling filter aligned with spanning intent.
  • Projected boundary Σ_H(D)=p(∂*D) independent evidence
    purpose: Identify the soap-film candidate associated to a minimizing fundamental domain.
    Central object of Theorems 1.1–1.2; area related by P(D)=2H²(p(∂*D)) (Prop. 3.6).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Plateau's Problem via covering spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XZMWZEYZ

@misc{pith2026260723703,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Plateau's Problem via covering spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XZMWZEYZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23703}
}
abstract

In 1995, Brakke proposed a formulation of the Plateau problem for a given boundary $\Gamma$ that allows for triple junctions and tetrahedral singularities. Let $\Gamma$ be a smooth closed curve and let $G=\pi_1(\mathbb{R}^3\setminus \Gamma)$. For each proper finite index subgroup $N$ of $G$, Brakke constructs a $(\mathrm{\mathbf{M}}, 0, \infty)$-minimal surface $\Sigma_N$, which is obtained as the projection of the boundary of a perimeter-minimising fundamental domain in the covering space associated to $N$. We advance the theory in two ways. Firstly, we extend Brakke's construction to include all normal subgroups $N\triangleleft G$, i.e. possibly with infinite index. Secondly, we prove a compactness result which implies that there exists a proper normal subgroup $N_0\triangleleft G$ such that \[ \mathrm{Area}(\Sigma_{N_0})=\inf_{\{N\triangleleft G, N \neq G\}}\ \mathrm{Area}(\Sigma_N). \] A similar result holds when $\Gamma$ has many connected components. Furthermore, we study the spanning and minimising properties of the $\Sigma_N$s and $\Sigma_{N_0}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23703 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Depiction of Example 1.2.1. 1.2.2. Γ consists of two circles. Here Γ = γ1 ∪ γ2 is the union of two unlinked circles. We have that π1(M) is the free group of rank 2 generated by two circles a and b circling γ1 and γ2 respectively. Note that the disk Σ with ∂Σ = γ1 is (M, 0, ∞)-minimal with respect to Γ and spans Γ modulo ⟨b⟩, the subgroup generated by b. Hence, Σ could be (and in fact is) obtained as Σ⟨b⟩ (D). This s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. This is a simplified depiction of the cut and paste argument mentioned in the proof of Proposition 1.4, where we only depict a single slice of B(0, 1) \ T0Γ transverse to T0Γ. Each row is a depiction of the double cover of B(0, 1) \ T0Γ obtained by gluing across the dashed plane. In the top row, we see a fundamental domain (shaded in blue) whose projected boundary consists of three half planes. The bottom row depict… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tsinghua Lectures , volume=

    Introduction to geometric measure theory , author=. Tsinghua Lectures , volume=

  2. [2]

    Algebraic topology , year =

    Hatcher, Allen , address =. Algebraic topology , year =. Algebraic topology , isbn =

  3. [3]

    Journal of Geometric Analysis , volume=

    Soap film solutions to Plateau’s problem , author=. Journal of Geometric Analysis , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  4. [4]

    , title =

    Parks, Harold R. , title =. The Journal of geometric analysis , language =. 1992 , issn =

    1992

  5. [5]

    , issn =

    Taylor, Jean E. , issn =. The Structure of Singularities in Soap-Bubble-Like and Soap-Film-Like Minimal Surfaces , volume =. 1976 , keywords =

    1976

  6. [6]

    The Journal of Geometric Analysis , volume=

    Soap films bounded by non-closed curves , author=. The Journal of Geometric Analysis , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  7. [7]

    Reifenberg, E. R. , issn =. Solution of the Plateau problem for m-dimensional surfaces of varying topological type , volume =. 1960 , language =

    1960

  8. [8]

    1995 , author =

    Soap films and covering spaces , volume =. 1995 , author =

    1995

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Annals of Mathematics , volume=

    Normal and integral currents , author=. Annals of Mathematics , volume=. 1960 , publisher=

    1960

  2. [10]

    , title =

    Allard, William K. , title =. Annals of mathematics , keywords =. 1972 , issn =

    1972

  3. [11]

    Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , language =

    Federer, Herbert , title =. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , language =. 1970 , address =

    1970

  4. [12]

    Annals of mathematics , keywords =

    Simons, James , title =. Annals of mathematics , keywords =. 1968 , issn =

    1968

  5. [13]

    Annals of mathematics , keywords =

    Hardt, Robert and Simon, Leon , title =. Annals of mathematics , keywords =. 1979 , issn =

    1979

  6. [14]

    Statique exp

    Plateau, Joseph Antoine Ferdinand , volume=. Statique exp. 1873 , publisher=

  7. [15]

    Almgren, F. J. , title =. Bulletin (new series) of the American Mathematical Society , language =. 1975 , issn =

    1975

  8. [16]

    Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

    Solution of the problem of Plateau , author=. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , volume=. 1931 , publisher=

    1931

  9. [17]

    Annals of Mathematics , volume=

    On Plateau's problem , author=. Annals of Mathematics , volume=. 1930 , publisher=

    1930

  10. [18]

    , author=

    Conformal mappings and the Plateau-Douglas problem in Riemannian manifolds. , author=. Journal fur die reine und angewandte Mathematik , year=

  11. [19]

    , title =

    Fleming, Wendell H. , title =. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , keywords =. 1966 , copyright =

    1966

  12. [20]

    Lickorish, W. B. Raymond. , series =. An introduction to knot theory , year =. An introduction to knot theory , isbn =

  13. [21]

    Advances in calculus of variations , language =

    Amato, Stefano and Bellettini, Giovanni and Paolini, Maurizio , title =. Advances in calculus of variations , language =. 2017 , address =

    2017

  14. [22]

    and Fusco, Nicola

    Ambrosio, Luigi. and Fusco, Nicola. and Pallara, Diego. , series =. Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems / , year =. Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems / , isbn =

  15. [23]

    Sets of Finite Perimeter and Geometric Variational Problems : An Introduction to Geometric Measure Theory , year =

    Maggi, Francesco , address =. Sets of Finite Perimeter and Geometric Variational Problems : An Introduction to Geometric Measure Theory , year =. Sets of Finite Perimeter and Geometric Variational Problems : An Introduction to Geometric Measure Theory , isbn =

  16. [24]

    , address =

    Bredon, Glen E. , address =. Topology and geometry , year =. Topology and geometry , isbn =

  17. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.3518 , year=

    The Kirby torus trick for surfaces , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.3518 , year=

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    and Xu, Dianna

    Gallier, Jean. and Xu, Dianna. , address =. A Guide to the Classification Theorem for Compact Surfaces , year =. A Guide to the Classification Theorem for Compact Surfaces , edition =

  19. [27]

    , address =

    Federer, Herbert. , address =. Geometric measure theory , year =. Geometric measure theory , isbn =

  20. [28]

    The Journal of Geometric Analysis , volume=

    Isoperimetric clusters in homogeneous spaces via concentration compactness , author=. The Journal of Geometric Analysis , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  21. [29]

    , issn =

    Allard, William K. , issn =. On the First Variation of a Varifold: Boundary Behavior , volume =. Annals of mathematics , keywords =

  22. [30]

    Allard-type boundary regularity for C^

    Bourni, Theodora , issn =. Allard-type boundary regularity for C^. Advances in calculus of variations , language =

  23. [31]

    and Tamanini, I

    Congedo, G. and Tamanini, I. , address =. On the existence of solutions to a problem in multidimensional segmentation , volume =. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré. Analyse non linéaire , keywords =

  24. [32]

    and Minicozzi, William P

    Colding, Tobias H. and Minicozzi, William P. , address =. A course in minimal surfaces , year =. A course in minimal surfaces , isbn =

  25. [33]

    Estimates for Stable Minimal Surfaces in Three Dimensional Manifolds , booktitle =

    Richard Schoen , editor =. Estimates for Stable Minimal Surfaces in Three Dimensional Manifolds , booktitle =. doi:doi:10.1515/9781400881437-006 , isbn =

    doi

  26. [34]

    Journal of the European Mathematical Society , volume=

    A direct approach to Plateau's problem , author=. Journal of the European Mathematical Society , volume=

  27. [35]

    Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , volume=

    Plateau's problem as a singular limit of capillarity problems , author=. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  28. [36]

    Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , volume=

    Smoothness of collapsed regions in a capillarity model for soap films , author=. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  29. [37]

    Discrete and continuous dynamical systems

    Soap films with gravity and almost-minimal surfaces , volume =. Discrete and continuous dynamical systems. Series A , language =. 2019 , author =

    2019

  30. [38]

    Advances in Calculus of Variations , volume=

    Existence and soap film regularity of solutions to Plateau’s problem , author=. Advances in Calculus of Variations , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  31. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.03797 , year=

    Plateau's Problem: What's Next , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.03797 , year=

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    , author=

    The Plateau-Douglas problem for nonorientable minimal surfaces. , author=. manuscripta mathematica , volume=

  33. [41]

    International Congress of Mathematicians , pages=

    The regularity theory for the area functional (in geometric measure theory) , author=. International Congress of Mathematicians , pages=

  34. [42]

    Advances in analysis: the legacy of Elias M

    Should we solve Plateau’s problem again , author=. Advances in analysis: the legacy of Elias M. Stein , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  35. [43]

    Periodic partitions with minimal perimeter , volume =

    Cesaroni, Annalisa and Novaga, Matteo , copyright =. Periodic partitions with minimal perimeter , volume =. Nonlinear analysis , language =

  36. [44]

    Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

    An example in the problem of least area , author=. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , volume=. 1956 , publisher=

    1956

  37. [45]

    Journal of Differential Geometry , volume=

    On the existence and regularity of fundamental domains with least boundary area , author=. Journal of Differential Geometry , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  38. [46]

    Guaraco, Marco A. M. and Lynch, Stephen , address =. Plateau’s problem via the Allen–Cahn functional , volume =. Calculus of variations and partial differential equations , keywords =

  39. [47]

    Geometric flows , language =

    Covers, soap films and BV functions , volume =. Geometric flows , language =. 2018 , author =

    2018

  40. [48]

    Interfaces and free boundaries , language =

    Triple covers and a non-simply connected surface spanning an elongated tetrahedron and beating the cone , volume =. Interfaces and free boundaries , language =. 2018 , author =

    2018

  41. [49]

    Pacific journal of mathematics , language =

    Paired calibrations applied to soap films, immiscible fluids, and surfaces or networks minimizing other norms , volume =. Pacific journal of mathematics , language =. 1994 , author =

    1994

  42. [50]

    Calibrations for minimal networks in a covering space setting , volume =. ESAIM. Control, optimisation and calculus of variations , keywords =. 2020 , author =

    2020

  43. [51]

    A crystalline approximation theorem for hypersurfaces , year =

    Sullivan, John Matthew , copyright =. A crystalline approximation theorem for hypersurfaces , year =

  44. [52]

    Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo , volume=

    On the oriented Plateau problem , author=. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo , volume=. 1962 , publisher=

    1962

  45. [53]

    Annals of Mathematics , volume=

    Minimal surfaces of higher topological structure , author=. Annals of Mathematics , volume=. 1939 , publisher=

    1939

  46. [54]

    Acta Math , year=

    The existence of minimal surfaces of given topological structure under prescribed boundary conditions , author=. Acta Math , year=

  47. [55]

    1976 , publisher=

    Existence and regularity almost everywhere of solutions to elliptic variational problems with constraints , author=. 1976 , publisher=

    1976

  48. [56]

    Introduction to minimal surfaces lecture notes for MATH 286 , author=

  49. [57]

    Brakke, Kenneth , title =

  50. [58]

    INdAM Workshop: Anisotropic Isoperimetric Problems & Related Topics , pages=

    Minimal periodic foams with equal cells , author=. INdAM Workshop: Anisotropic Isoperimetric Problems & Related Topics , pages=. 2022 , organization=

    2022

  51. [59]

    Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations , volume=

    Lattice tilings with minimal perimeter and unequal volumes , author=. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  52. [60]

    Mathematika , volume=

    Minimal periodic foams with fixed inradius , author=. Mathematika , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  53. [61]

    1996 , publisher=

    Survey on knot theory , author=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.