Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 84 references

Accurate wetting dynamics via a conservative Allen-Cahn based lattice Boltzmann approach for multiphase flows

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a local geometric ghost-node wetting condition that lets a conservative Allen–Cahn lattice Boltzmann method impose a prescribed contact angle on voxelized solid walls of arbitrary orientation, and validates it on static,

desk verdict A useful, well-explained incremental wetting boundary condition for conservative Allen–Cahn lattice Boltzmann, with honest validation and one genuinely load-bearing assumption that needs more testing before the complex-geometry claims are trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25444 v1 pith:EA2YFI7Q submitted 2026-07-28 physics.flu-dyn

Paolo Bello , Luca Mander , Marco Lauricella , Gianmarco Guglielmo , Michele La Rocca , Andrea Montessori This is my paper
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords conservativeAllen–CahnlatticeBoltzmanncontactanglewettingboundaryconditionghostnodephase-fieldmultiphaseflowdropletspreadingimpact
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a boundary treatment that imposes a target contact angle in a conservative Allen–Cahn lattice Boltzmann solver without assuming any predefined wall direction. At each solid node, a wall normal is reconstructed from nearby fluid links, a donor fluid node is selected, and a ghost phase-field value is extrapolated so that the interface meets the wall at the prescribed angle. A separate interface-localized global correction keeps the phase-field mass exactly conserved. The method is validated on static droplets from 30° to 160°, spreading droplets that follow contact-angle-dependent power laws between t^1/2 and t^1/4, impacting droplets that follow We^1/4 scaling, and gravity-driven passage through a sharp-edged orifice that reproduces capture, release, and breakup regimes. If correct, this gives a local, thread-safe, GPU-compatible way to simulate wetting in complex geometries.

What carries the argument

The ghost-node wetting update is the load-bearing mechanism. At each wall-adjacent solid node, the wall normal n_w is reconstructed from the fluid–solid occupancy as n_w = Σ w_q(-c_q)/|Σ w_q(-c_q)|, where the weights w_q are 1, 1/2, or 1/3 depending on link length. A donor fluid node is chosen by maximizing the alignment score S_q = (-c_q)·n_w/|c_q|. The gradient at the donor node is split into wall-tangent and wall-normal parts, the normal part is set by ∂_n ϕ = -|∇∥ϕ| cot(π - θ), and the ghost value is extrapolated as ϕ_g = ϕ_f + λ_s ∇ϕ_c · r_fs with λ_s = sqrt(4ϕ_f(1-ϕ_f)). A separate mass-correction step adds an interface-localized source term proportional to ϕ(1-ϕ) to enforce global con

What would settle it

Run a static-droplet test on a curved or randomly roughened voxel wall where the true local normal is known analytically (for example, a sphere or cylinder) and compare the measured equilibrium contact angle with the prescribed angle across a range of θ. If the error grows systematically with surface curvature or in stair-step patches, the occupancy-based normal reconstruction is the limiting component; if the error remains small, the method extends beyond planar validation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a prescribed contact angle can be enforced in a conservative Allen–Cahn lattice Boltzmann model by constructing ghost phase-field values from the local voxelized geometry alone. For each solid node adjacent to fluid, the unnormalized wall normal is computed as the weighted sum of inward-pointing lattice links, then normalized. A donor fluid node is chosen by maximum alignment with that normal, and the phase field is extrapolated along the donor-to-solid direction using a wall-normal derivative set by the target angle and a localization factor that concentrates the correction at the diffuse interface. The authors show that this local update recovers prescribed equili

Load-bearing premise

The wall normal reconstructed from local fluid–solid occupancy is assumed to faithfully represent the true solid orientation, including at corners and sharp edges, and the first-order donor extrapolation is assumed sufficient to impose the stated angle; the authors note that curved and rough surfaces still require assessment.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Conservative Allen–Cahn lattice Boltzmann simulations can now prescribe wetting on arbitrarily oriented voxelized solids without ad hoc wall-direction corrections.
  • The local, thread-safe update is directly compatible with GPU-based large-scale simulations, enabling wetting-controlled flows in porous media and microfluidic geometries.
  • The interface-localized mass correction prevents long-time phase-field drift caused by non-neutral wetting boundary conditions, which is critical for confined flows with persistent contact lines.
  • The method reproduces dynamic wetting scalings (spreading exponents between 1/2 and 1/4, We^1/4 impact scaling), so it can be used to study contact-line dynamics and droplet impact beyond its static validation.
  • The sharp-edged orifice results show that the treatment captures edge-pinning and the transition from capture to release, opening a route to study droplet transport through constrictions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: Because the wall normal is reconstructed from binary fluid–solid occupancy, the effective angle on stair-stepped voxel surfaces may differ from the intended angle; a curvature-aware or higher-order normal reconstruction is a natural extension the paper leaves untested.
  • Inference: The first-order donor extrapolation with the localization factor λ_s could be upgraded to second order or combined with a local contact-line velocity model, which would allow rate-dependent dynamic contact angles and hysteresis to be represented within the same ghost-node structure.
  • Inference: The global mass correction acts as a Lagrange multiplier that redistributes mass over the diffuse interface; applying it independently of the local wetting update may interact with contact-line pinning when the interface is anchored at a sharp edge, a scenario the current benchmarks only partially explore.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a local geometric wetting boundary condition for a conservative Allen–Cahn-based lattice Boltzmann (CAC-LB) framework. The wall normal is reconstructed locally from fluid–solid occupancy (Eqs. 36–38), a donor fluid node is selected by alignment with this normal, and a ghost phase-field value is computed by a first-order extrapolation with an interface-localization factor (Eqs. 39–47). A separate global correction redistributes any phase-field mass imbalance over the diffuse interface (Eqs. 48–53). The method is validated on four benchmarks: static contact angles on a planar wall, short-time inertial–capillary spreading, droplet impact on a hydrophobic surface, and gravity-driven droplet passage through a sharp-edged orifice. The paper claims that the approach provides an accurate and scalable framework for wetting-controlled flows in complex geometries.

Significance. If the results hold, the contribution is practically valuable: a wetting boundary condition that is local, explicit, race-free, and compatible with thread-safe GPU implementations, without requiring a predefined Cartesian wall direction. The dynamic benchmarks are compared against independent experimental scalings (Bird–Mandre–Stone, Clanet et al., Bordoloi–Longmire) and do not use those data to fit model constants, which is a strength. The method also addresses the known mass-conservation issue of non-neutral wetting in second-order phase-field models. However, the validation is partly qualitative, particularly the spreading-exponent claim, and the paper's generality claim about complex geometries extends beyond the demonstrated evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.B, Fig. 4] The abstract and §III.B claim that the model reproduces contact-angle-dependent spreading exponents between approximately 1/2 and 1/4. This is not supported by a quantitative measurement. The text says the curves 'approach' the limiting scalings and are 'consistent with' Bird et al., but no exponent is fitted; the dashed 1/2 and 1/4 lines are only visual references. On a log-log plot, a curve can appear between two power laws without actually following a power law over a defined window. Please fit r(t)/R0 = A (t/τ_i)^α for each θ_eq over a specified early-time interval, report the fitted α with confidence intervals or residuals, and compare systematically with the theoretical trend.
  2. [§II.C, Eq. (53)] The global volume correction modifies the phase field at every time step by adding ΔMφ/W χ(x), with χ(x) nonzero only in the diffuse-interface band, which includes the contact-line region. This correction could therefore alter the very wetting dynamics used to validate the model. The paper states that the correction is 'small' but provides no magnitude, no time series, and no sensitivity study. Please report ΔMφ/Mφ for the dynamic benchmarks, test at least two values of the threshold ϵφ, and demonstrate that the spreading exponents and We^{1/4} scaling are insensitive to the correction (or to its amplitude). Without this, one cannot exclude that the mass-correction mechanism, rather than the wetting boundary condition, is responsible for part of the observed dynamic behavior.
  3. [§III.D and Conclusions] The abstract and conclusions claim that the scheme 'can be applied directly to voxelized solid geometries and sharp edges.' The evidence for this is limited: the static-angle tests are planar, and the orifice benchmark, while using a circular stair-stepped edge, is one symmetric geometry. The wall-normal reconstruction, Eqs. (36)–(38), is a weighted occupancy sum whose accuracy on oblique, rough, or strongly curved voxelized surfaces is not established and is not guaranteed by construction; the donor extrapolation, Eq. (46), propagates any normal error into the ghost value. The conclusions themselves concede that 'a broader assessment on curved and rough surfaces would be required.' Either add a quantitative test on a curved or oblique wall (e.g., a static angle on an inclined or stair-stepped plane, or a droplet on a curved surface) or temper the generality claim in the abstract and con
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (40)] The set D(x_s) of 'admissible donor links' is used before being defined. The text later says wall-adjacent fluid nodes are considered first, but this should be stated formally when D(x_s) is introduced.
  2. [Eq. (47)] The localization factor λ_s is a heuristic; no derivation or reference is provided. Since it scales the entire ghost extrapolation, a brief justification or a sensitivity test with respect to λ_s would strengthen the method.
  3. [§III.A] The static-angle test reports deviations of 'a few degrees' without a table or error quantification. This is acceptable as a consistency check, but numerical values for each θ_th would make the claim more precise and reproducible.
  4. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption contains a grammatical error: 'the left plot report the non dimensional spreading diameter' should be 'the left plot reports the non-dimensional spreading diameter.'
  5. [§III.C, Eq. (62)] The Weber number is typeset as 'W e' in several places (e.g., 'W e= ρℓU^2_0 D0/σ' and in Fig. 6). This is a typographical issue; it should be 'We.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the wetting boundary condition is imposed locally and the dynamic benchmarks are compared to independent experiments; the admitted lack of curved/rough-surface validation is a limitation of evidence, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense that matters for circularity. The new element, the ghost-node wetting update of Eqs. (36)-(47) with the global mass correction of Eq. (53), is not obtained by fitting any benchmark target. The prescribed contact angle enters only as a boundary condition: Eqs. (42)-(46) construct a corrected gradient and ghost value from the locally reconstructed wall normal and donor-fluid extrapolation, so the static test of Sec. III.A is a self-consistency check of the numerical implementation rather than an independent prediction of a fitted quantity. No constant is calibrated to make it pass. The dynamic claims are validated against external data: the spreading exponents are compared with Bird, Mandre and Stone (Ref. 46), the We^{1/4} maximum-deformation scaling with Clanet et al. (Ref. 47), and the orifice capture/release/breakup regimes with Bordoloi and Longmire (Ref. 48). None of these external quantities is used to set model parameters. The mass-correction multiplier lambda_M of Eq. (55) is a Lagrange multiplier enforcing conservation of M_phi, not a fitted term. The self-citations (Refs. 16, 17, 30, 31, 37) supply the underlying conservative Allen-Cahn lattice Boltzmann and thread-safe LB machinery, but they are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem, do not forbid alternative wetting treatments, and the wetting boundary condition itself is tested against independent experiments. The paper explicitly concedes in Sec. IV that 'a broader assessment on curved and rough surfaces would be required' before claiming accuracy over fully general solid geometries; that is an acknowledged limitation of validation scope and a correctness/robustness risk, but it is not circularity because the load-bearing dynamic comparisons do not reduce to their own inputs. No claimed prediction is equivalent by construction to an input parameter or to a prior self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method relies on a small set of hand-chosen reconstruction weights, unspecified tolerances, and the geometric contact-angle relation from prior diffuse-interface literature. The central predictive comparisons are against external experimental scalings, so the ledger burden is moderate rather than heavy.

free parameters (5)
  • Wall-normal link weights w_q = 1 (axis), 1/2 (face-diagonal), 1/3 (body-diagonal)
    Chosen in Eq. (37) to reconstruct the local wall normal from voxelized fluid-solid occupancy; no justification or calibration is provided.
  • Wall-normal magnitude tolerance for skipping solid nodes = not reported
    Pseudo-code step 3/6 uses a 'prescribed tolerance' below which the node is skipped; the value is absent, affecting behavior in corners and thin features.
  • Contact-angle cotangent regularization threshold = not reported
    Eq. (44) is regularized by replacing cot θ with a large finite value when |sin θ_c| is small; the threshold is unspecified.
  • Interface-band threshold ε_φ for mass correction = not reported
    Eq. (51) uses ε_φ to identify the diffuse-interface band for the global mass correction; the numerical value is absent.
  • Interfacial localization factor λ_s = sqrt(4 φ_f (1-φ_f))
    Eq. (47), chosen ad hoc to concentrate the wetting correction at the interface; no derivation or error analysis is given.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The LB-CAC framework of Ref. 16 recovers the variable-density Navier-Stokes and conservative Allen-Cahn equations in the hydrodynamic limit.
    Used to interpret measured phase-field evolution as physical wetting dynamics; not independently re-derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The geometric condition ∂_nw φ = -||∇∥φ_f|| cot(π-θ) enforces the prescribed macroscopic contact angle.
    Eqs. (43)-(45), inherited from geometric contact-angle formulations (Refs. 25, 29); assumed correct for CAC ghost nodes.
  • domain assumption The wall normal reconstructed from voxelized fluid-solid occupancy represents the true solid surface orientation, including near corners and sharp edges.
    Load-bearing for applying the BC to voxelized geometries; only one symmetric sharp-edged orifice is tested, and the authors call for future work on curved/rough surfaces.
  • ad hoc to paper First-order ghost extrapolation with the localization factor λ_s preserves the diffuse-interface profile and yields the intended contact angle.
    No error analysis; the extrapolation is first-order and relies on a single donor node.
  • ad hoc to paper The global volume correction, redistributing mass over the interface band, does not alter the wetting dynamics.
    Added as a Lagrange multiplier to enforce M_φ; its dynamical side effects on contact-line motion are not quantified.
  • standard math Lattice Boltzmann Hermite expansions and MUSCL-TVD minmod reconstruction are stable and second-order as stated.
    The paper relies on these discretizations to evolve velocity and phase field; no formal proof is given in the manuscript.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Accurate wetting dynamics via a conservative Allen-Cahn based lattice Boltzmann approach for multiphase flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EA2YFI7Q

@misc{pith2026260725444,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Accurate wetting dynamics via a conservative Allen-Cahn based lattice Boltzmann approach for multiphase flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EA2YFI7Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25444}
}
read the original abstract

In this work we propose a local geometric wetting boundary condition for a conservative Allen--Cahn-based lattice Boltzmann framework. The prescribed contact angle is imposed through ghost phase-field values constructed from a locally reconstructed wall normal and a donor-fluid extrapolation. The ghost-node wetting update is local, geometrically consistent, and compatible with thread-safe large-scale implementations, while phase-field mass is controlled through a separate global volume correction. Validation includes static contact-angle tests, short-time droplet spreading, impact on a hydrophobic surface, and gravity-driven motion through a sharp-edged orifice. The simulations recover the imposed equilibrium angles, reproduce contact-angle-dependent spreading exponents between approximately 1/2 and 1/4, and follow the classical W e1/4 maximum-deformation scaling. The model also captures the transition between capture, release, and release with breakup. The proposed approach provides an accurate and scalable framework for wetting-controlled flows in complex geometries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25444 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Schematic of the static contact-angle benchmark. A droplet of initial radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Static contact-angle validation. The measured numerical contact angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Schematic of the short-time spreading benchmark. A spherical droplet of initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Short-time spreading dynamics for different equilibrium contact angles. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Representative stages of droplet impact on a hydrophobic surface: the left plot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Maximum deformation of a droplet impacting a hydrophobic surface. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Schematic of the gravity-driven droplet-orifice benchmark. A droplet of diameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Drop motion through a sharp-edged orifice. (a) Regime map in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Axial dynamics of a droplet crossing a sharp-edged orifice. Time evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. D. Birell and P. C. W. Davies , year = 1982, title =

    1982

  2. [2]

    R. P. Feynman. Phys.\ Rev. 1954

    1954

  3. [3]

    Einstein and Yu Podolsky and N

    A. Einstein and Yu Podolsky and N. Rosen. Phys.\ Rev. 1935

    1935

  4. [4]

    G. P. Berman, Jr. and F. M. Izrailev, Jr. Stability of nonlinear modes. Physica D. 1983

    1983

  5. [5]

    E. B. Davies and L. Parns. Trapped modes in acoustic waveguides. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 1988

    1988

  6. [6]

    Edward Witten. 2001. hep-th/0106109

    arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    E. Beutler. Williams Hematology. 1994

    1994

  8. [8]

    Donald E. Knuth. Fundamental Algorithms. 1973b 1973

    1973

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    J. S. Smith and G. W. Johnson. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B. 2005

    2005

  2. [10]

    W. J. Smith and T. J. Johnson and B. G. Miller. Surface chemistry and preferential crystal orientation on a silicon surface. 2010

    2010

  3. [11]

    V. K. Smith and K. Johnson and M. O. Klein. Surface chemistry and preferential crystal orientation on a silicon surface. 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    Lower Bounds for Wishful Research Results

    Ulrich \" U nderwood and Ned \ N et and Paul \= P ot. Lower Bounds for Wishful Research Results

  5. [13]

    M. P. Johnson and K. L. Miller and K. Smith. 2007

    2007

  6. [14]

    AIP Conf. Proc. 2007

    2007

  7. [15]

    Fifteenth Annual

    Proc. Fifteenth Annual

  8. [16]

    Y. Burstyn. Proceedings of the 5th International Molecular Beam Epitaxy Conference, Santa Fe, NM. 2004

    2004

  9. [17]

    Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference, Portland, OR, 12-16 May 2005. 2001

    2003

  10. [18]

    A. G. Agarwal. Proceedings of the Fifth Low Temperature Conference, Madison, WI, 1999. Semiconductors. 2001

    1999

  11. [19]

    R. Smith. Hummingbirds are our friends. 2001

    2001

  12. [20]

    J. Smith. Proc. SPIE. 2007

    2007

  13. [21]

    An O(n n / \! n) Sorting Algorithm

    Tom T \' e rrific. An O(n n / \! n) Sorting Algorithm

  14. [22]

    Mastering Thesis Writing

    \' E douard Masterly. Mastering Thesis Writing

  15. [23]

    S. R. Kawa and S.-J. Lin. J. Geophys. Res. 2003

    2003

  16. [24]

    Phidias Phony-Baloney

    F. Phidias Phony-Baloney. Fighting Fire with Fire: Festooning F rench Phrases

  17. [25]

    Donald E. Knuth. Seminumerical Algorithms. 1973c 1981

    1981

  18. [26]

    Jill C. Knvth. The Programming of Computer Art

  19. [28]

    Ballagh and C.M

    R. Ballagh and C.M. Savage. Bose-Einstein condensation: from atomic physics to quantum fluids. Proceedings of the 13th Physics Summer School. 2000. cond-mat/0008070

    2000 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Opechowski and R

    W. Opechowski and R. Guccione. Introduction to the Theory of Normal Metals. Magnetism. 1965

    1965

  21. [30]

    J. M. Smith. Molecular Dynamics. 1980

    1980

  22. [31]

    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat. Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one-dimensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 1971

    1971

  23. [32]

    Daniel D. Lincoll. Semigroups of Recurrences. High Speed Computer and Algorithm Organization

  24. [33]

    Oaho and Jeffrey D

    Alfred V. Oaho and Jeffrey D. Ullman and Mihalis Yannakakis. On Notions of Information Transfer in VLSI Circuits. Proc. Fifteenth Annual ACM

  25. [34]

    The Definitive Computer Manual

    Larry Manmaker. The Definitive Computer Manual

  26. [35]

    Bird and Shreyas Mandre and Howard A

    James C. Bird and Shreyas Mandre and Howard A. Stone , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , year =. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.234501 , publisher =

    doi

  27. [36]

    Physical Review Fluids , volume=

    Breakdown of Kolmogorov scaling and modified energy transfer in bubble-laden turbulence , author=. Physical Review Fluids , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  28. [37]

    and Longmire, Ellen K

    Bordoloi, Ankur D. and Longmire, Ellen K. , year=. Drop motion through a confining orifice , volume=. doi:10.1017/jfm.2014.572 , journal=

    2014 doi

  29. [38]

    2004 , publisher=

    Capillarity and wetting phenomena: drops, bubbles, pearls, waves , author=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  30. [39]

    Reviews of modern physics , volume=

    Wetting and spreading , author=. Reviews of modern physics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  31. [40]

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics , volume=

    On the spreading of liquids on solid surfaces: static and dynamic contact lines , author=. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics , volume=. 1979 , publisher=

    1979

  32. [41]

    2017 , publisher=

    Multiphase flow in permeable media: A pore-scale perspective , author=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  33. [42]

    Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering , volume=

    Pore-scale modeling: Effects of wettability on waterflood oil recovery , author=. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  34. [43]

    Journal of petroleum technology , volume=

    Wettability and its effect on oil recovery , author=. Journal of petroleum technology , volume=. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  35. [44]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Wettability control on multiphase flow in patterned microfluidics , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  36. [45]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Wetting controls of droplet formation in step emulsification , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  37. [46]

    Lab on a Chip , volume=

    Development and future of droplet microfluidics , author=. Lab on a Chip , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  38. [47]

    Annual review of fluid mechanics , volume=

    Fundamental fluid dynamics challenges in inkjet printing , author=. Annual review of fluid mechanics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  39. [48]

    Water Resources Research , volume=

    Effect of surfactant-assisted wettability alteration on immiscible displacement: A microfluidic study , author=. Water Resources Research , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  40. [49]

    Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering , volume=

    Reactive flows in porous media: Challenges in theoretical and numerical methods , author=. Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  41. [50]

    Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements , volume=

    Review of the conservative Allen--Cahn equations , author=. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  42. [51]

    Physical Review E , volume=

    Phase-field-based lattice Boltzmann modeling of large-density-ratio two-phase flows , author=. Physical Review E , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  43. [52]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Sharp interface tracking using the phase-field equation , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  44. [53]

    Physics of Fluids , volume=

    Thread-safe multiphase lattice Boltzmann model for droplet and bubble dynamics at high density and viscosity contrasts , author=. Physics of Fluids , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  45. [54]

    Procedia Computer Science , volume=

    accLB: A High-Performance Lattice Boltzmann Code for Multiphase Turbulence on Multi-Gpu Architectures , author=. Procedia Computer Science , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  46. [55]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics , volume=

    Maximal deformation of an impacting drop , author=. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  47. [56]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Short-time dynamics of partial wetting , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  48. [57]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    A conservative phase field method for solving incompressible two-phase flows , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  49. [58]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Isotropic discrete Laplacian operators from lattice hydrodynamics , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  50. [59]

    Physical review E , volume=

    Discrete lattice effects on the forcing term in the lattice Boltzmann method , author=. Physical review E , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  51. [60]

    2018 , publisher=

    The lattice Boltzmann equation: for complex states of flowing matter , author=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  52. [61]

    2017 , publisher=

    The lattice Boltzmann method , author=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  53. [62]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=

    Shear stress in lattice Boltzmann simulations , author=. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  54. [63]

    Journal of computational physics , volume=

    Calculation of two-phase Navier--Stokes flows using phase-field modeling , author=. Journal of computational physics , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  55. [64]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=

    Phase-field-based lattice Boltzmann model for incompressible binary fluid systems with density and viscosity contrasts , author=. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  56. [65]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.06900 , year=

    Increasing stability and accuracy of the lattice Boltzmann scheme: recursivity and regularization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.06900 , year=

    arXiv

  57. [66]

    Physics of Fluids , volume=

    Phase field lattice Boltzmann model for air-water two phase flows , author=. Physics of Fluids , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  58. [67]

    Physical Review E , volume=

    Lattice Boltzmann approach for complex nonequilibrium flows , author=. Physical Review E , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  59. [68]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=

    Analysis and reduction of the spurious current in a class of multiphase lattice Boltzmann models , author=. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  60. [69]

    Physical Review E , volume=

    Improved locality of the phase-field lattice-Boltzmann model for immiscible fluids at high density ratios , author=. Physical Review E , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  61. [70]

    Annual review of fluid mechanics , volume=

    Diffuse-interface methods in fluid mechanics , author=. Annual review of fluid mechanics , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  62. [71]

    Physical Review E , volume=

    Conservative phase-field lattice Boltzmann model for interface tracking equation , author=. Physical Review E , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  63. [72]

    Physics of Fluids , volume=

    High-order thread-safe lattice Boltzmann model for high performance computing turbulent flow simulations , author=. Physics of Fluids , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  64. [73]

    2013 , publisher=

    Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics: a practical introduction , author=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  65. [74]

    Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , author=. Journal of computational Physics , volume=. 1979 , publisher=

    1979

  66. [75]

    1939 , publisher=

    Orthogonal polynomials , author=. 1939 , publisher=

    1939

  67. [76]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Implementing contact angle boundary conditions for second-order phase-field models of wall-bounded multiphase flows , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  68. [77]

    Computers & fluids , volume=

    Accurate contact angle boundary conditions for the Cahn--Hilliard equations , author=. Computers & fluids , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  69. [78]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=

    Wetting condition in diffuse interface simulations of contact line motion , author=. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  70. [79]

    Physics of Fluids , volume=

    Simplified method for wetting on curved boundaries in conservative phase-field lattice-Boltzmann simulation of two-phase flows with large density ratios , author=. Physics of Fluids , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  71. [80]

    Physical Review E , volume=

    Simplified wetting boundary scheme in phase-field lattice Boltzmann model for wetting phenomena on curved boundaries , author=. Physical Review E , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  72. [81]

    International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids , volume=

    Wetting boundary conditions in numerical simulation of binary fluids by using phase-field method: some comparative studies and new development , author=. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  73. [82]

    Mathematics and Computers in Simulation , volume=

    Comparison study of the conservative Allen--Cahn and the Cahn--Hilliard equations , author=. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  74. [83]

    Physical Review E , volume=

    Comparative study of the lattice Boltzmann models for Allen-Cahn and Cahn-Hilliard equations , author=. Physical Review E , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  75. [84]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16843 , year=

    A mass-conserving contact line treatment for second-order conservative phase field methods based on the generalized Navier boundary condition , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16843 , year=

    arXiv

  76. [85]

    Journal of Computational Science , volume=

    Thread-safe lattice Boltzmann for high-performance computing on GPUs , author=. Journal of Computational Science , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.