Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 79 references

SKAO-ALMA Synergies in Star Formation Science

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The SKA and ALMA, both in the Southern hemisphere, can work together to map star-forming gas across five orders of magnitude in density and to time stellar flares from centimetre to millimetre wavelengths.

desk verdict A useful, honest SKA-ALMA synergy roadmap; the central simultaneous-time-domain claim is quantitatively unsubstantiated but explicitly caveated. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25721 v1 pith:RETYX4DH submitted 2026-07-28 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Jan Forbrich , Gary A. Fuller , Mark A. Thompson , Eleonora Bianchi , Jaime E. Pineda , Marta De Simone , Tomoya Hirota , Katharine Johnston
show 2 more authors
Steven N. Longmore Giovanni Sabatini
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords starformationSKAALMAradiointerferometrytime-domainastronomymolecularcloudsrecombinationlinesyoungstellarobjects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This chapter argues that the SKA telescopes and ALMA, both located in the Southern hemisphere, will together create an unprecedented observational window for star formation science. It identifies three concrete synergy areas: simultaneous time-domain and variability studies of (proto)stars across the centimetre-to-millimetre spectrum, complementary molecular-line observations that trace gas from diffuse interstellar material to dense protostellar cores (e.g., formaldehyde over up to five orders of magnitude in density), and radio recombination lines that probe ionised gas at many densities. The authors argue that these synergies will begin with SKA Early Science and grow as ALMA's 2030 Wideband Sensitivity Upgrade quadruples its instantaneous bandwidth. The payoff, if realized, is a step change from single-telescope views to true multi-frequency tomography of star-forming regions and young stellar objects.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is frequency-space complementarity between the two arrays: SKA covers the low-frequency regime where free-free, gyrosynchrotron, maser, and low-frequency RRL emission dominate, while ALMA covers the high-frequency regime of dust emission and high-J molecular lines. Three diagnostic tools carry the argument: (1) spectral-index time series built from simultaneous cm-mm light curves, treating the two telescopes as one wideband instrument; (2) the H2CO (and cyanopolyyne) ladder spanning five orders of magnitude in gas density; and (3) radio recombination line series with up to 82 Hn-alpha lines simultaneously in a single SKA-Mid band, complemented by ALMA's high-frequency R

What would settle it

A concrete falsifier would be to compute the annual simultaneous-visibility windows and elevation tracks for a specific target (e.g., Orion) at both sites and show that the total usable time is too short to sample a flare's rise and decay, or to run a sensitivity calculation for a faint iCOM line (e.g., benzyne at ~9 GHz at an abundance of ~10^-10) against SKA-Mid's projected noise and find it undetectable in any reasonable integration time.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The chapter's central claim is that the combination of SKA-Low, SKA-Mid, and ALMA, with their complementary frequency coverage (50 MHz–15 GHz and 35–950 GHz) and both in the Southern sky, enables simultaneous measurements that have previously been impossible outside the Northern-limited VLA-ALMA pair. By observing the same target at centimetre and millimetre wavelengths at comparable angular resolution and in the same epoch, one can measure spectral-index time series that disentangle gyrosynchrotron flaring, free-free jets, and dust emission; use the H2CO ladder and species like HC3N/HC5N to map density and temperature from diffuse to dense gas; and use radio recombination lines to trace ion

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the few hours of joint sky visibility between ALMA and the SKA sites can be scheduled at the required cadence with matched beam sizes, and that SKA-Mid can actually detect the faint molecular lines the chapter invokes—neither of which is demonstrated with a sensitivity calculation or a visibility schedule.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Simultaneous SKA-ALMA monitoring will produce the first spectral-index time series of extreme stellar flares across more than two decades of frequency, constraining electron populations in YSO coronae and their connection to accretion.
  • H2CO observed by SKA in absorption and by ALMA in emission will map molecular gas density and temperature continuously from low-density cloud envelopes to compact cores, linking cloud-scale conditions to individual star formation.
  • Multi-frequency radio recombination lines will trace ionised gas from dense HII regions to diffuse halo gas, with SKA-Mid also measuring free-free continuum to correct line-to-continuum ratios and electron temperatures.
  • SKA-Mid's access to optically thin cm wavelengths will reveal complex organic molecules in protostellar disks that are obscured at ALMA wavelengths, and will quantify dust optical depth, correcting gas temperature and column density measurements.
  • A Southern-sky survey of 6.7 GHz methanol and 1.6 GHz OH masers combined with ALMA maser transitions will test evolutionary sequences and episodic accretion in high-mass star formation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The chapter's case for simultaneous observations implicitly depends on scheduling the few joint-visibility hours per day; an alternative the authors leave unstated is quasi-simultaneous sequential monitoring with both arrays, which would still give spectral-index time series on longer timescales, at lower peak sensitivity.
  • The paper's own list of key diagnostics highlights a 15–35 GHz frequency gap between SKA-Mid Band 5 and ALMA Band 1, which would block access to NH3 inversion transitions and methanol K-ladders; this is an unspoken argument for extending SKA-Mid to a Band 6.
  • If the proposed joint observations work for Galactic star formation, the same cm-plus-mm pairing could be applied to extragalactic star formation and to other variable astrophysical sources, since the method is frequency-driven rather than source-specific.
  • A near-term test of the feasibility is to use existing ALMA and MeerKAT data on a known flaring young star in overlapping visibility windows, to check whether the proposed cm-mm spectral-index time series can actually be obtained with current sensitivity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a chapter for the SKA-II volume reviewing potential synergies between SKAO (SKA-Low/SKA-Mid) and ALMA for star formation science. It covers continuum science, spectral-line studies of molecular clouds and young stellar objects, simultaneous time-domain observations, maser variability, and early-science opportunities with the ALMA2030 Wideband Sensitivity Upgrade. The headline claims are that joint SKAO–ALMA observations will enable spectral-index time series of stellar flares, complementary molecular tracers (e.g., H2CO) spanning large density ranges, and radio recombination line studies of ionised gas at multiple densities.

Significance. If the claimed synergies materialize, the chapter provides a useful programmatic overview of a fast-evolving observational landscape. Its strengths include concrete counts of simultaneously observable hydrogen RRLs (82 in SKA-Mid Band 1, 36 in Band 2, 21 in Band 5a), a well-chosen example of the flaring YSO ORBS, and a transparent acknowledgement of feasibility constraints in Section 5.1. The manuscript is not a measurement paper; its value rests on the plausibility of future facility capabilities. The main unmet need is quantitative support for the two most distinctive claims: simultaneous spectral-index flare science and SKA-Mid detection of complex organic molecules at low abundances.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.1, Fig. 5] The flagship claim that SKAO–ALMA will enable simultaneous spectral-index flare science is not quantitatively supported. The text concedes 'limited hours of simultaneous visibility' and 'rare occurrences' of suitable beam matches, but provides no joint-visibility calculation for representative southern targets (e.g., Orion, Ophiuchus, Corona Australis), no analysis of how ALMA's configuration cycle affects usable overlap, and no estimate of how many simultaneous epochs with matched beams would be needed to produce a spectral-index time series. Without this, the claim remains a plausible aspiration rather than an established prospect. Please add order-of-magnitude calculations for at least one representative region, or explicitly soften the claim to a conditional synergy.
  2. [§4.2] The claim that SKA-Mid will detect iCOMs and long carbon chains (including benzyne, indene, glycolamide) in cold prestellar cores is made without a sensitivity estimate. The quoted abundances (10^-12 to 10^-6 relative to H2) and single-dish GBT detections do not establish that SKA-Mid Band 5 can detect these weak lines in reasonable integration times at the stated angular resolution. A simple line-strength or column-density sensitivity check for one or two representative species toward a source like L1544 would transform this section from speculation to a falsifiable expectation. Without it, the chemical-inventory synergy is a key unverified part of the chapter's central thesis.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§5.1] The sentence 'The sites of SKA-Mid and SKA-Low have only very limited simultaneous visibility' is garbled; it should refer to limited simultaneous visibility between ALMA and SKA-Mid/SKA-Low. Please rephrase.
  2. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption mentions ALMA and VLA, but the text discusses ALMA–MeerKAT simultaneous visibility. Clarify what is plotted (MeerKAT vs SKA-Mid?) and ensure the caption matches the text.
  3. [§2] The phrase 'SKA-Mid Band 5b cannot be simultaneously observed in its entirety' is awkward; suggest 'the full Band 5b cannot be covered in a single frequency tuning.'
  4. [§6] The reference 'SKAMemo20-01' is not in the reference list; please add a full bibliographic entry.
  5. [§4.1] Write 'H I' rather than 'Hi' for atomic hydrogen in the phrase 'the atomic hydrogen (Hi)' and in 'CO and Hi.'
  6. [§3] The sentence 'There are at least four mechanisms that produce continuum emission' is followed by a list of four, but 'the first of these' is ambiguous because the first listed item is described only as 'the interaction of energetic ionised particles...'; name it explicitly (gyrosynchrotron/synchrotron).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: this is a review/prospectus chapter with no fitted-parameter predictions; self-citations are pointers, not load-bearing reductions.

full rationale

The chapter is a forward-looking review of SKAO-ALMA synergies rather than a derivation chain. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, and no prediction that is constructed from its own inputs. Claims such as the number of H_n-alpha recombination lines observable in SKA-Mid bands are direct consequences of the stated frequency coverage and line rest frequencies, not outputs of a model. The scientific arguments rest on independent published observations (e.g., Forbrich et al. 2008; Vargas-González et al. 2023; De Simone et al. 2020) and published facility specifications. Citations to companion chapters in the same SKA volume (Bianchi, Karska, Rygl, Sabatini 2026) are cross-references to more detailed discussions, not load-bearing justifications of the central claim, and no uniqueness or exclusivity argument is imported from them. The main feasibility caveat in Section 5.1 — limited simultaneous visibility and rare beam-size matches — is explicitly acknowledged by the authors, and while it exposes a quantitative gap in the case for simultaneous time-domain science, a missing feasibility calculation is a correctness/evidential concern, not a circularity. No step in the text reduces to its own input, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The chapter is a review/prospectus; its arguments rest on assumptions about future facility capabilities and operational coordination. No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated. The most fragile assumptions are the availability of SKA-Mid Band 6, ALMA2030 WSU, and the feasibility of coordinated simultaneous observations.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Quoted SKA/ALMA technical specifications (beam sizes, bandwidths, AA* and AA4 configurations) are accurate and will be realised as stated.
    Section 2 and Figure 5 rely on these numbers for all synergy arguments; they are inputs from the observatories, not derived here.
  • domain assumption ALMA and SKA observations can be coordinated in time despite limited simultaneous visibility.
    Section 5.1 acknowledges 'limited hours of simultaneous visibility' but the time-domain science case assumes coordinated monitoring is feasible.
  • domain assumption The proposed SKA-Mid Band 6 (15–50 GHz) will be part of the final SKA design.
    Section 6 argues the NH3 and methanol K-ladder science requires this band, referencing SKA Memo 20-01; if Band 6 is not built, a key part of the spectral-line synergy disappears.
  • domain assumption ALMA2030 Wideband Sensitivity Upgrade will deliver the stated 4x instantaneous bandwidth.
    Section 2 and 6 use the WSU to argue that ALMA can observe many molecular transitions in one setup; the upgrade is planned but not yet delivered.
  • domain assumption SKA-Mid will be sensitive enough to detect weak iCOM lines with abundances down to 10^-12 relative to H2.
    Section 4.2 claims SKA-Mid will detect long carbon chains and rings based only on single-dish detections and low-J line frequencies; no interferometric sensitivity calculation is provided, so this is an unverified premise for the chemistry-synergy case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SKAO-ALMA Synergies in Star Formation Science." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RETYX4DH

@misc{pith2026260725721,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SKAO-ALMA Synergies in Star Formation Science},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RETYX4DH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25721}
}
read the original abstract

We highlight the potential for synergies between the SKA telescopes and ALMA, which will begin to be significant already with SKA Early Science. Broadly within star formation science, we focus on 1) (simultaneous) time domain and variability studies (e.g., of (proto-)stars), which is systematically opening a new observing window that will enable us to better constrain the physics of extreme stellar flares and their interplay with mass accretion in young stars, 2) possibilities for complementary coverage of different transitions of molecules as tracers of the ISM (e.g., H2CO to trace density and temperature), and 3) radio recombination lines to trace ionised gas at different densities. Furthermore, we address synergies in terms of the spatial resolution of both observatories and new capabilities not only on the SKAO side but extending to the ALMA2030 wideband sensitivity upgrade.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25721 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The BN/KL region in Orion as an example of two continuum views in identical fields: left: a deep VLA 10 GHz view (Forbrich et al., 2016), and right: an ALMA 100 GHz view (Vargas-González et al., 2023). The point source population is clearly complementary, with only partial overlap. Source BN is marked for orientation, as well as deeply embedded young stellar object ORBS (where an extreme cm-radio flare was observed … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Hydrogen RRLs covered in the frequency bands of SKA telescopes and ALMA (and MeerKAT’s S-Band for completeness). For clarity, only the H𝑛𝛼 and H𝑛𝛽 lines are shown. Typically, the H𝑛𝛽 lines are ∼30% of the brightness of the H𝑛𝛼 lines. There are a similar number of H𝑛𝛾 and He𝑛𝛼 lines in the frequency bands, both of which are ∼10% of the brightness of the H𝑛𝛼 lines. Additionally, there are several molecular species wit… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spectra showcasing complex molecular species detected across two distinct frequency ranges. The low-frequency data toward the prestellar core L1544 (Upper panel) were obtained with the 100 m Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope (Bianchi et al., 2023; Giani et al., 2025b). The (sub-)millimetre emission toward the young protostar L1551 IRS5 (lower panel) was obtained with ALMA as part of the FAUST Large Program (Bianch… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Radio light curves of the embedded YSO ORBS: left: a VLA light curve at 22 GHz (from Forbrich et al., 2008), and right: an ALMA 100 GHz light curve (from Vargas-González et al., 2023). time domain. Until recently, and particularly when considering YSOs, extreme variabi…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simultaneous visibility of astronomical objects from the ALMA and SKAO sites, as a function of Declination. The simultaneous visibility between ALMA and VLA is shown for comparison. Apart from sensitivity considerations, the synthesised beam size will be a major constr…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5a56. E. Bianchi et al.ApJ, 944(2):208, Feb

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5a56

  2. [5]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb5e8. E. Bianchi et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb5e8

  3. [9]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2f8a. R. A. Burns. In T. Hirota, H. Imai, K. Menten, and Y. Pihlström, editors,Cosmic Masers: Proper Motion Toward the Next-Generation Large Projects, volume 380 ofIAU Symposium, pages 443–451, Jan

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab2f8a

  4. [10]

    doi: 10.1017/S1743921323003381. R. A. Burns et al.Nature Astronomy, 7:557–568, May

    doi:10.1017/s1743921323003381

  5. [11]

    doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01899-w. L. Cacciapuoti et al.ApJ, 961(1):90, Jan

    doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01899-w

  6. [12]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0f17. L. Cacciapuoti et al.A&A, 700:A188, Aug

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0f17

  7. [16]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141573. L. Cros et al.A&A, 701:A148, Sept

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141573

  8. [17]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555085. M. De Simone et al.ApJ, 896(1):L3, June

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555085

Show all 79 references
  1. [18]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8d41. M. De Simone et al.ApJ, 935(1):L14, Aug

    doi

  2. [19]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac85af. A. K. Diaz-Rodriguez et al.ApJ, 930(1):91, May

    doi

  3. [20]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3b50. B. T. Draine.ARA&A, 41:241–289, Jan

    doi

  4. [21]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840. B. T. Draine and A. Lazarian.ApJ, 494(1):L19–L22, Feb

    arXiv

  5. [27]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7aa4. A. Frank et al. In H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, and T. Henning, editors,Protostars and Planets VI, pages 451–474, Jan

    doi

  6. [29]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452191. R. Fuentetaja et al.A&A, 663:L3, July

    doi

  7. [30]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243857. Y. Gao and P. M. Solomon.ApJ, 606(1):271–290, May

    doi

  8. [32]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab311a. L. Giani et al.MNRAS, staf1941, Nov. 2025b. ISSN 0035-8711. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1941. A. Ginsburg et al.ApJ, 736(2):149, Aug

    doi

  9. [34]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafb71. A. Ginsburg et al.ApJ, 942(2):66, Jan

    doi

  10. [35]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9f4a. M. Güdel.ARA&A, 40:217–261, Jan

    doi

  11. [37]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039798. T. Hirota et al.PASJ, 74(5):1234–1262, Oct

    doi

  12. [38]

    doi: 10.1093/pasj/psac067. A. Hoque et al.ApJ, 987(2):197, July

    doi

  13. [39]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add928. C. L. H. Hull et al.ApJ, 823(2):L27, June

    doi

  14. [40]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L27. T. R. Hunter et al.ApJ, 837(2):L29, Mar

    doi

  15. [41]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa5d0e. K. Immer et al.A&A, 595:A94, Nov

    doi

  16. [42]

    15 SKAO–ALMA Synergies J

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628777. 15 SKAO–ALMA Synergies J. Forbrich et al. I. Jiménez-Serra et al.ApJ, 764(1):L4, Feb

    doi

  17. [44]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8adc. A. Karska et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  18. [45]

    doi: 10.1086/383186. P. Kaufmann et al.ApJ, 697(1):420–427, May

    doi

  19. [48]

    doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-0123-7. C.-F. Lee et al.Science Advances, 3(4):e1602935, Apr

    doi

  20. [49]

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602935. M.-Y. Lee et al.ApJ, 809(1):56, Aug

    doi

  21. [51]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1577. A. López-Sepulcre et al.A&A, 692:A120, Dec

    doi

  22. [52]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450169. J. G. Mangum and A. Wootten.ApJS, 89:123, Nov

    doi

  23. [54]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab960b. M. J. Maureira et al.A&A, 689:L5, Sept

    doi

  24. [55]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451166. B. A. McGuire et al.ApJ, 900(1):L10, Sept

    doi

  25. [56]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba632. D. M. A. Meyer, E. I. Vorobyov, R. Kuiper, and W. Kley.MNRAS, 464(1):L90–L94, Jan

    doi

  26. [57]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw187. A. Morbidelli et al.A&A, 691:A147, Nov

    doi

  27. [58]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451388. L. Moscadelli, R. Cesaroni, M. T. Beltrán, and V. M. Rivilla.A&A, 650:A142, June

    doi

  28. [59]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140829. M. Padovani, D. Galli, and A. E. Glassgold.A&A, 501(2):619–631, July

    doi

  29. [60]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace164. T. Peters, S. N. Longmore, and C. P. Dullemond.MNRAS, 425(3):2352–2368, Sept

    doi

  30. [62]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526803. A. J. Remijan et al.ApJ, 976(1):105, Nov

    doi

  31. [63]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad856e. V. M. Rivilla et al.ApJ, 953(2):L20, Aug

    doi

  32. [64]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace977. K. L. J. Rygl et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  33. [65]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140469. G. Sabatini, S. Bovino, and E. Redaelli.ApJ, 947(1):L18, Apr

    doi

  34. [66]

    Sabatini et al.A&A, 692:A265, Dec

    G. Sabatini et al.A&A, 692:A265, Dec. 2024a. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451659. G. Sabatini et al.A&A, 684:L12, Apr. 2024b. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449616. G. Sabatini et al.A&A, 698:L16, June

    doi

  35. [67]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554750. G. Sabatini et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  36. [68]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1451. K. Taniguchi, M. Saito, T. K. Sridharan, and T. Minamidani.ApJ, 872(2):154, Feb

    doi

  37. [69]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab001e. K. Taniguchi et al.ApJ, 965(2):162, Apr

    doi

  38. [70]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2fa1. S. Thorwirth et al.ApJ, 586(1):338–343, Mar

    doi

  39. [71]

    doi: 10.1086/367629. Y. Tsukamoto, M. N. Machida, and S.-i. Inutsuka.ApJ, 920(2):L35, Oct

    doi

  40. [72]

    H.Uchimura,T.Kudoh,andY.Tsukamoto.ApJ,984(2):143,May2025

    doi: 10.3847/ 2041-8213/ac2b2f. H.Uchimura,T.Kudoh,andY.Tsukamoto.ApJ,984(2):143,May2025. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ adc806. J. S. Urquhart. In T. Hirota, H. Imai, K. Menten, and Y. Pihlström, editors,Cosmic Masers: Proper Motion Toward the Next-Generation Large Projects, volume ...

    doi

  41. [73]

    doi: 10.1017/S1743921323002326. J. Vargas-González et al.MNRAS, 522(1):56–69, June

    doi

  42. [74]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad926. Y. X. Wang et al.A&A, 663:A177, July

    doi

  43. [75]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142450. M. Wright et al.ApJ, 945(1):14, Mar

    doi

  44. [76]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acac2c. C. Xue et al.ApJS, 281(1):9, Nov

    doi

  45. [77]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae04e5. Y. Zhang et al.ApJ, 886(1):L4, Nov

    doi

  46. [78]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5309. I. I. Zinchenko et al.MNRAS, 543(1):L9–L13, Oct

    doi

  47. [79]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf086. 17

    doi

  48. [1985]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001125. S. A. Dzib, J. Forbrich, M. J. Reid, and K. M. Menten.ApJ, 906(1):24, Jan

  49. [1993]

    doi: 10.1086/191841. M. J. Maureira et al.ApJ, 897(1):59, July

    doi

  50. [1998]

    doi: 10.1086/311167. G. A. Dulk.ARA&A, 23:169–224, Jan

    doi

  51. [1999]

    37.1.363

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro. 37.1.363. F. Fontani et al.A&A, 605:A57, Sep

    doi

  52. [2002]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806. E. Herbst and E. F. van Dishoeck.ARA&A, 47:427–480, Sept

  53. [2003]

    doi: 10.1086/379101. S. L. Breen et al.ApJ, 876(2):L25, May

    doi

  54. [2004]

    doi: 10.1086/382999. S. Giacalone et al.ApJ, 882(1):33, Sept

    doi

  55. [2008]

    doi: 10.1086/522570. M. Kuffmeier, B. Zhao, and P. Caselli.A&A, 639:A86, July

    doi

  56. [2009]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/420. E. Keto, Q. Zhang, and S. Kurtz.ApJ, 672(1):423–432, Jan

    doi

  57. [2011]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/149. A. Ginsburg et al.ApJ, 872(1):54, Feb

    doi

  58. [2012]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21676.x. J. E. Pineda et al.A&A, 686:A162, June

    2012

  59. [2013]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/764/1/L4. K. G. Johnston et al.ApJ, 896(1):35, June

    doi

  60. [2014]

    doi: 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch020. J. Frediani et al.A&A, 695:A78, Mar

    doi

  61. [2015]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/56. T. Liu et al.MNRAS, 496(3):2790–2820, Aug

    doi

  62. [2016]

    doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/2/93. J. Forbrich et al.ApJ, 844(2):109, Aug

    doi

  63. [2017]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730527. J. Forbrich, K. M. Menten, and M. J. Reid.A&A, 477(1):267–272, Jan

    doi

  64. [2018]

    C.Codellaetal.FrontiersinAstronomyandSpaceSciences,8:227,Dec.2021

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732238. C.Codellaetal.FrontiersinAstronomyandSpaceSciences,8:227,Dec.2021. doi: 10.3389/fspas. 2021.782006. L. Colzi et al.A&A, 653:A129, Sept

    2021

  65. [2019]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab191c. C. L. Brogan et al.ApJ, 881(2):L39, Aug

    doi

  66. [2020]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa130. E. Bianchi et al.ApJ, 928(1):L3, Mar

    doi

  67. [2021]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141660. R. Cesaroni et al.A&A, 612:A103, May

    doi

  68. [2022]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1391. E. Bianchi et al.MNRAS, 498(1):L87–L92, Nov

    doi

  69. [2023]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acef1d. M. R. Bate.MNRAS, 514(2):2145–2161, Aug

    doi

  70. [2024]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347856. G. C. Bower et al.ApJ, 598(2):1140–1150, Dec

    doi

  71. [2025]

    C.Ceccarellietal

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554645. C.Ceccarellietal. InProtostarsandPlanetsVII,volume534ofASPConferenceSeries,page379, July 2023a. 14 SKAO–ALMA Synergies J. Forbrich et al. C. Ceccarelli et al. In S. Inutsuka et al., editors,Protostars and Planets VII, volume 534 of Astronomica...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.