Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Multi-Parameter Exponential Sums with Product Hilbert Kernels

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the multi-parameter exponential sum with product Hilbert kernel is uniformly bounded exactly when a parity condition holds: every monomial exponent has at most one odd coordinate, unless the sum vanishes by symmetry.

desk verdict Genuinely new and likely correct, but the sufficiency proof rests on an unproved anisotropic Konyagin-type lemma (9.1) that must be supplied before the result is checkable. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25955 v2 pith:QRHD6UN7 submitted 2026-07-28 math.CA

Joonil Kim , Hoyoung Song This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CA MSC 42B2011L0742B25
keywords multi-parameterexponentialsumsproductHilbertkerneldiscretetransformcirclemethodlayeredarcsmajorarcrigidityparityconditionℓ^pboundedness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper characterizes, for every finite set Λ of monomials in k variables, when the truncated multi-parameter exponential sum with the product kernel 1/(t1⋯tk) remains uniformly bounded in the coefficients and cutoff parameters. The answer is a parity rule: if no subset of Λ has all coordinate sums odd, the sum is identically zero by symmetry; otherwise uniform boundedness holds precisely when every monomial exponent in Λ has at most one odd coordinate. The paper proves both necessity and sufficiency, and under the same condition shows the associated discrete multiple Hilbert transform is bounded on ℓ^p(Z^{|Λ|}) for every 1

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is a k-parameter circle method with layered arcs: the phase Σ_{m∈Λ} ξ_m t^m is read as a polynomial in the first ℓ variables whose coefficients are polynomials in the remaining variables. For each frozen outer variable, one defines major arcs for the sliced frequency ξ(t2); when these sliced major arcs occur for many values of the variable, a rigidity lemma forces the original frequency to lie in a much wider coarse major arc. This major-arc rigidity converts a heavy concentration of layered major arcs into rational-approximation information at the next layer, allowing the variables to be peeled off successively. The coarse arcs are then merged into the original major

What would settle it

A direct counting check of Lemma 3.4 would settle the proof: take the polynomial t1 t2 on the box [1,2^j]^2 and compare the claimed bound C 2^{2j} 2^{-r/2} with the actual number of pairs satisfying |t1 t2|≤2^{2j-r}; if a logarithmic factor appears, the lemma is false as stated and the E_sub estimates lose their summable decay. At the level of the theorem itself, a numerical search for Λ={(1,1)} in k=2 that kept sup_N,ξ |H^Λ_N(ξ)| bounded would refute the necessity half, since the paper proves divergence for this forbidden monomial.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For fixed Λ⊂Z^k_+, consider H^Λ_N(ξ)=Σ_{t∈R(N)∩Z^k} e^{2πiΣ_{m∈Λ}ξ_m t^m}/(t1⋯tk). Main Theorem 1 states a strict dichotomy: if Λ contains no odd subset, the sum is identically 0 by symmetry; if Λ contains an odd subset, the supremum over N,ξ is finite if and only if every m∈Λ has at most one odd coordinate. The necessity proof exhibits, for any forbidden Λ, frequencies and truncations along which |H^Λ_N(ξ)| grows like log N. Main Theorem 2 upgrades this uniform multiplier bound to ℓ^p(Z^{|Λ|})→ℓ^p(Z^{|Λ|}) boundedness of the limiting discrete multiple Hilbert transform for every 1<p<∞. The proof splits the summation scales into balanced and unbalanced sectors, approximates major arcs by Gau

Load-bearing premise

The sufficiency proof leans on an unproved lattice sublevel-set counting estimate (Lemma 3.4): for a polynomial of degree d on a dyadic box, the number of lattice points where |Ση_m t^m|≤ε is claimed to be at most C 2^{Σj} (ε/A)^{1/d}; should this bound require logarithmic losses or a weaker exponent, the E_sub decay estimates and with them the sufficiency half of Main Theorem 1 collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For k=2 the discrete and continuous boundedness conditions coincide, but for k≥3 they diverge; the classical discrete-to-continuous comparison m_disc = m_cont + O(1) fails for polynomial phases.
  • Uniform boundedness of the multiplier gives, by Plancherel, ℓ^2 boundedness of the truncated transforms; Main Theorem 2 extends this to every 1<p<∞.
  • The necessity construction yields quantitative divergence: for any forbidden Λ there are coefficient choices and truncations with |H^Λ_N(ξ)| ≳ log N, so no constant depending only on Λ can control the sums.
  • The condition is checkable directly from Λ and is uniform in both the real coefficients and the independent truncation parameters N1,...,Nk.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The layered-arc and major-arc rigidity scheme should transfer to multi-frequency Weyl sums that obstruct multi-parameter ergodic theorems; the model phase t1(ξ1+ξ2 t2^2) is the natural first test case.
  • A plausible next step is the general polynomial-mapping version of the problem, where Newton polyhedra and coefficient dependence will replace the pure monomial parity rule.
  • The ℓ^p result suggests that multi-parameter pointwise ergodic averages for commuting transformations with polynomial steps should converge for all 1<p<∞ whenever a similar parity condition holds on the dominant monomials.
  • The log N divergence for forbidden monomials gives a quantitative obstruction: any generalization admitting even one monomial with two odd coordinates must introduce an additional cancellation mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies uniform boundedness of multi-parameter exponential sums with a product Hilbert kernel and polynomial phase, and the ℓ^p boundedness of the associated discrete multiple Hilbert transform. Main Theorem 1 gives a complete dichotomy: the sums are uniformly bounded iff Λ contains no odd subset (in which case they vanish) or every m∈Λ has at most one odd component. Main Theorem 2 asserts ℓ^p boundedness for every 1<p<∞ under the same sufficient condition. The proof develops a multi-parameter circle method built on layered arcs and a 'major-arc rigidity' principle, together with Weyl, Gauss, and sublevel-set estimates. The necessity direction is proved by a residue-class decomposition and Poisson summation. The sufficiency proof is organized as an induction over k and occupies Sections 4–6; the ℓ^p result is obtained in Section 8 via the Ionescu–Wainger multiplier theory.

Significance. If correct, the main theorem is a substantial and natural completion of the one-parameter theorem of Arkhipov–Oskolkov and clarifies the contrast with the continuous multiple Hilbert transform. The paper gives an explicit and checkable characterization, and the proposed major-arc rigidity mechanism is a genuinely new idea that could have further use. The necessity proof is detailed and appears to be self-contained. However, the sufficiency half currently rests on two large unproved auxiliary estimates—Lemma 3.4 and Lemma 9.1—both of which are used at decisive points to obtain geometric decay. In particular, the averaged Gauss-sum estimate Proposition 3.2 is only proved modulo Lemma 9.1, and the sublevel-set decay used for the E_sub terms is asserted without proof. Until these estimates are supplied with complete proofs or precise references, the central claim is not fully verifiable. The paper is therefore significant but conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [§9.2, Lemma 9.1; used in §5.5 and §6.3] Lemma 9.1 is the only support for the averaged Gauss-sum estimate Proposition 3.2. The text says the proof is by 'standard induction' and is omitted, and no reference is given. The one-variable Konyagin theorem [28] does not formally imply the anisotropic k-parameter bound (9.6). This estimate is used through (3.18) in Lemmas 5.5 and 6.4 to bound E_gauss by q^{-δΛ}2^{-δΛ j_{ℓ+1}}. If (9.6) carries logarithmic factors or a decay constant c that degrades with the aspect ratio j_1/j_k, the divisor sum d(q) in (3.14) cannot be controlled and the E_gauss bounds collapse. A complete proof, or a precise citation to a result containing (9.6), is indispensable.
  2. [§3.4, Lemma 3.4; used in §5.4 and §6.3] The discrete sublevel-set estimate is introduced 'without proof'. The text only mentions the continuous analogue from Carbery–Wright [13], but the passage from continuous measure to a sharp lattice-point count in dyadic boxes requires additional argument and is not automatic at the stated exponent 2^{-(1/d)r}. This estimate is used in Lemmas 5.6 and 6.5 to obtain the 2^{-cj2} / 2^{-cj_{ℓ+1}} decay of E_sub. Any logarithmic loss or weaker exponent would break the summability in the induction proving Theorem 4.1. Please provide a complete proof of Lemma 3.4 or a reference containing exactly this statement.
  3. [§3.2, Proposition 3.1] The proof of Proposition 3.1 is compressed in Case 2. The text asserts that outside Ψ^{Ω,major}_{j,(1/2,1)} one has lcm(q_m : m∈Ω) ≥ 2^{j_k/20}, and that together with the bound on the linear denominators this recovers condition (3.9). The implied step is presumably lcm(|m|≥2) ≥ lcm(all)/lcm(|m|=1) ≥ 2^{j_k/20 - k j_k/(60k)} = 2^{j_k/30}, but this is not written out. Since Proposition 3.1 feeds into Lemma 4.1 and the balanced Weyl bound, the constants and the lcm argument should be spelled out so the exponent is verifiable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.2] Typo: 'it suffies' should be 'it suffices'. Throughout, the distinction between HΛ_j and the continuous HΛ_j is easy to miss; consider using different fonts.
  2. [§5.4] In the proof following (5.35), 'indendent of t2' should be 'independent of t2'. Also, the summation index condition R_{m,j_2}(η)>0 under the sum is awkward; clarify the range of η.
  3. [§8.3] The notation h=[λ^ϵ] and N=[h^{D/s}] conflicts with the earlier convention [n]={1,...,n}. The authors note this conflict only in parentheses; it would be cleaner to use ⌊λ^ϵ⌋ and avoid a second meaning.
  4. [§1.2, Remark 1.1] The sentence 'Therefore, the uniform boundedness of HΛ_N(ξ) implies that of HΛ_N(ξ)' appears to contain a typo; the two displayed symbols are identical. The intended comparison with the continuous transform should be restated.
  5. [§9.2] The remark that Lemma 9.1 'is therefore omitted' is not acceptable in a research paper if the result is not standard; this is already the content of Major Comment 1, but the wording should also be changed in a revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorem is derived from independently stated estimates; self-citations supply method and context, not load-bearing conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation attempts to prove (3.4), the uniform l^1-summability of the dyadic multipliers H^Λ_j(ξ), under the structural assumption (1.8). This is broken into a major-arc estimate (Proposition 4.1), balanced Weyl-sum estimates (Lemma 4.1), and unbalanced estimates via Theorem 4.1, proved by induction over parameters using layered arcs and the major-arc rigidity principle. None of these steps fits a parameter to the target boundedness or renames the target condition as a derived result. The only parameter selected, δ_Λ, is chosen after the independent estimates (3.15)–(3.18) and is used uniformly in ξ and N; it is not tuned to data. The self-citations to [26], [27], and [21] are contextual or methodological: the continuous multiplier lemma used in the major-arc estimate is proved in Section 9.1, the necessity proof in Section 7 is a self-contained parity/Poisson-summation argument, and the ℓ^p argument invokes the external Ionescu–Wainger theorem. The statement that Theorem 1.2 follows from [26] is not load-bearing, since its sufficient part is re-proved. The unproved auxiliary statements, Lemma 3.4 and especially the anisotropic Konyagin-type Lemma 9.1 used in Proposition 3.2, are proof gaps rather than circularity: they are counting/sublevel estimates used to obtain geometric decay, not restatements or consequences of the theorem being proved. No equation in the manuscript reduces Main Theorem 1 or 2 to an identity involving its own conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is pure mathematics; the free parameters are proof constants, not data fits. The central theorem depends on two unproved counting lemmas (Lemma 3.4 and Lemma 9.1) and on external Weyl and Ionescu–Wainger theorems. No new physical or mathematical entities are postulated; layered arcs, coarse major-arc connectors, and major-arc rigidity are analytic devices proved inside the paper.

free parameters (4)
  • δΛ (decay exponent) = sufficiently small positive constant chosen after (3.15)-(3.18)
    Depends only on Λ; hand-picked to make Weyl, Gauss, and averaged Gauss-sum decays all have a common exponent. Not fitted to any data, but the entire proof's decay rates are calibrated against it.
  • K = N^{10k}, N = |Λ|! ∑_{m∈Λ}(|m|+k)
    Hand-chosen large constant controlling 'imbalanced' sectors and widths of coarse major arcs; appears in Claim 5.1, (6.9), and denominators 2^{N^4 j2}.
  • ρ = (400K)^{-k} δΛ
    Introduced in (6.5) to make ρ j_k ≥ 10 ρ^2 j_{ℓ+1} and to control error terms in the Λ\Λ′ minor-arc estimates; hand-chosen.
  • Arc radii exponents 1/10, 1/20, 1/100, 1/5 = 1/10, 1/20, 1/100, 1/5
    Many cutoff radii are hand-set; specific values are not forced by the problem. They influence constants but not the qualitative iff.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Lemma 3.4: discrete sublevel set estimate on Z^k
    Stated without proof; justified only by the continuous Carbery–Wright analogue, but the lattice counting version needs an additional argument. Used in §5.4 and §6.3 for E_sub decay.
  • ad hoc to paper Lemma 9.1: multi-parameter Konyagin-type anisotropic solution counting
    Proof explicitly omitted 'via standard induction'; used in Proposition 3.2 to prove the averaged Gauss sum estimates.
  • standard math Lemma 3.2 / Proposition 3.1: multi-parameter Weyl sums of Arkhipov–Chubarikov–Karatsuba
    External theorem needed for balanced and one-variable minor arc bounds.
  • standard math Theorem 8.2: Ionescu–Wainger discrete multiplier theorem
    External theorem used in the ℓ^p boundedness proof.
  • standard math Poisson summation and Dirichlet approximation
    Used throughout the major-arc decompositions and the necessity proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-Parameter Exponential Sums with Product Hilbert Kernels." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QRHD6UN7

@misc{pith2026260725955,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-Parameter Exponential Sums with Product Hilbert Kernels},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QRHD6UN7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25955}
}
abstract

We establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the uniform boundedness of the multi-parameter exponential sums with product Hilbert kernels $$\sum_{1\le|t_1|\le N_1,\cdots,1\le|t_k|\le N_k} \frac{e^{2\pi i P(t_1,\dots,t_k)}}{t_1\cdots t_k},$$ where $P:\mathbb{Z}^k\to\mathbb{R}$ is a polynomial of the form $P(t)=\sum_{\mathfrak{m}\in \Lambda} c_{\mathfrak{m}}\, t^{\mathfrak{m}},$ with real coefficients. The resulting bound is uniform in both the coefficients $c_{\mathfrak m}$ and the truncation parameters $N_1,\ldots,N_k$. To this end, we develop a higher-dimensional version of the multi-parameter circle method. Under the sufficient condition, we further prove $\ell^p$-boundedness of the associated discrete multiple Hilbert transform.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [27]

    J. Kim, H. Song,Discrete Double Hilbert Transforms Along Polynomial Surfaces.arxiv:2209.08072

    arXiv

  2. [21]

    Hejna–Łyżwa, J

    A. Hejna–Łyżwa, J. Kim, B. Langowski, M. Mirek, H. Song, and J. Wright,Discrete analogues in harmonic analysis: Multi-parameter Radon averages, arXiv:2607.18160

    arXiv

  3. [28]

    S. V. Konyagin,On the number of solutions of a congruence of then-th degree,Math. Notes 26 (1979), no. 4, 744–748; translated from Mat. Zametki 26 (1979), no. 4, 503–511

    1979

  4. [13]

    Carbery, J

    A. Carbery, J. Wright,Distributional andLq norm inequalities for polynomials over convex bodies in Rn, Math. Res. Lett.8(2001), no. 3, 233–248

    2001

  5. [1]

    Arkhipov, V.N

    G.I. Arkhipov, V.N. Chubarikov, A.A. Karatsuba.Distribution of fractional parts of polynomials of several variables, Mat. Zametki 25 (1979), no. 1, pp. 3–14

    1979

  6. [2]

    G. I. Arkhipov, V. N. Chubarikov, A. A. Karatsuba.Trigonometric Sums In Number Theory And Analysis(De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics). Walter De Gruyter Inc. (2004)

    2004

  7. [3]

    G. I. Arkhipov, K. I. Oskolkov,On a special trigonometric series and its applications, Mat. Sb. [Russian Acad. Sci. Sb. Math.],134(176) (1987), no. 2(10), 147–157

    1987

  8. [4]

    Bellow, Measure Theory Oberwolfach 1981

    A. Bellow, Measure Theory Oberwolfach 1981. Proceedings of the Conference held at Oberwolfach, June 21– 27, 1981. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 945, editors D. Kölzow and D. Maharam-Stone. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (1982). Section: Two problems submitted by A. Bellow, 429–431

    1981

Show all 45 references
  1. [5]

    Birkhoff,Proof of the ergodic theorem,Proc

    G. Birkhoff,Proof of the ergodic theorem,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 17 no. 12, (1931), 656–660

    1931

  2. [6]

    Bourgain,On the maximal ergodic theorem for certain subsets of the integers, Israel J

    J. Bourgain,On the maximal ergodic theorem for certain subsets of the integers, Israel J. Math.61 (1988), 39–72

    1988

  3. [7]

    Bourgain,On the pointwise ergodic theorem onLp for arithmetic sets, Israel J

    J. Bourgain,On the pointwise ergodic theorem onLp for arithmetic sets, Israel J. Math.61(1988), 73–84

    1988

  4. [8]

    Bourgain,Pointwise ergodic theorems for arithmetic sets, with an appendix by the author, H

    J. Bourgain,Pointwise ergodic theorems for arithmetic sets, with an appendix by the author, H. Furstenberg, Y. Katznelson, and D.S. Ornstein, Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math.69(1989), 5–45

    1989

  5. [9]

    Bourgain,Double recurrence and almost sure convergence.J

    J. Bourgain,Double recurrence and almost sure convergence.J. Reine Angew. Math. 404 (1990), pp. 140–161

    1990

  6. [10]

    Bourgain, M

    J. Bourgain, M. Mirek, E. M. Stein, J. Wright,On a multi-parameter variant of the Bellow-Furstenberg Problem. Forum Math Pi, 11 (2023) 1-64

    2023

  7. [11]

    Carbery, S

    A. Carbery, S. Wainger, J. Wright,Double Hilbert transforms along polynomial surfaces inR3. Duke Math. J.101(3): 499-513

  8. [12]

    Carbery, S

    A. Carbery, S. Wainger, J. Wright,Triple Hilbert transforms along polynomial surfaces inR4, Rev. Mat. Iberoam.25(2009), no. 2, 471–519,

    2009

  9. [14]

    Y. Cho, S. Hong, J. Kim, C. W. Yang,Triple Hilbert transforms along polynomial surfaces, Integral Equations Operator Theory65(2009), no 4, 485–528,

    2009

  10. [15]

    Dunford,An individual ergodic theorem for non-commutative transformations, Acta Sci

    N. Dunford,An individual ergodic theorem for non-commutative transformations, Acta Sci. Math. Szeged14(1951), 1–4

    1951

  11. [16]

    M. Z. Garaev,On a multiple trigonometric series, Acta Arithm,102(2002), no. 2, 183–187

    2002

  12. [17]

    Fulton,Introduction to toric varieties, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol.131, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993

    W. Fulton,Introduction to toric varieties, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol.131, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993

    1993

  13. [18]

    Furstenberg,Ergodic behavior of diagonal measures and a theorem of Szemeredi on arithmetic progressions.J

    H. Furstenberg,Ergodic behavior of diagonal measures and a theorem of Szemeredi on arithmetic progressions.J. Anal. Math. 31 (1977), pp. 204–256

    1977

  14. [19]

    Furstenberg, Problems Session, Conference on Ergodic Theory and Applications University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, June 1982

    H. Furstenberg, Problems Session, Conference on Ergodic Theory and Applications University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, June 1982

    1982

  15. [20]

    G. H. Hardy, S. Ramanujan,Asymptotic formulae in combinatorial analysis, Proc. London Math. Soc. 17(1918): 75–115

    1918

  16. [22]

    Ionescu, A

    A. Ionescu, A. Magyar, E.M. Stein, S. Wainger,Discrete Radon transforms and applications to ergodic theory, Acta Math.198(2007), 231–298

    2007

  17. [23]

    Ionescu, A

    A. Ionescu, A. Magyar, S. Wainger,Averages along polynomial sequences in discrete nilpotent Lie groups: Singular Radon transforms. In Advances in analysis: the legacy of Elias M. Stein,146–188, Princeton Math. Ser. 50, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2014. 106 JOONIL KIM...

    2014

  18. [24]

    A. D. Ionescu, A. Magyar, M. Mirek, T. Z. Szarek.Polynomial averages and pointwise ergodic theorems on nilpotent groups. Inventiones Mathematicae 231, (2023), pp. 1023-1140

    2023

  19. [25]

    Ionescu, S

    A. Ionescu, S. Wainger,Lp boundedness of discrete singular Radon transformsJ. Amer. Math. Soc.19 (2006), no. 2, 357–383

    2006

  20. [26]

    Kim,Multiple Hilbert transforms associated with polynomials, Memoir of AMS,237(2015), no 3, 1-120

    J. Kim,Multiple Hilbert transforms associated with polynomials, Memoir of AMS,237(2015), no 3, 1-120

    2015

  21. [29]

    Krause, M

    B. Krause, M. Mirek, T. Tao, Pointwise ergodic theorems for non-conventional bilinear polynomial averages. Ann. of Math. 195 (2022), no. 3, pp. 997–1109

    2022

  22. [30]

    D, Kosz, M, Mirek, S, Peluse, R, Wan, J, Wright,The multilinear circle method and a question of Bergelson.arxiv:2411.09478

  23. [31]

    Magyar, E.M

    A. Magyar, E.M. Stein, S. Wainger,Discrete analogues in harmonic analysis: spherical averages, Ann. Math.155(2002), 189–208

    2002

  24. [32]

    Magyar, E.M

    A. Magyar, E.M. Stein, S. Wainger,Maximal operators associated to discrete subgroups of nilpotent Lie groups.J. Anal. Mat. 101 (2007), no. 1, pp. 257–312

    2007

  25. [33]

    Mirek, E.M

    M. Mirek, E.M. Stein, P. Zorin-Kranich,Jump inequalities for translation-invariant operators of Radon type onZd, Advances in Mathematics365(2020), 107065

    2020

  26. [34]

    Mirek, B

    M. Mirek, B. Trojan,Discrete maximal functions in higher dimensions and applications to ergodic theory, Amer. J. Math.138(2016), no. 6, 1495–1532

    2016

  27. [35]

    Mirek, T.Z

    M. Mirek, T.Z. Szarek, J. Wright,Oscillation inequalities in ergodic theory and analysis; one parameter and multi-parameter perspectives, Rev. Mat. Iberoam.38(2022), no. 7, 2249–2284

    2022

  28. [36]

    Nagel, S

    A. Nagel, S. Wainger,L2 boundedness of Hilbert transforms along surfaces and convolution operators homogeneous with respect to a multiple parameter group, Amer. J. Math.99(1977), no 4, 761–785

    1977

  29. [37]

    Patel,Double Hilbert transforms along polynomial surfaces in R3, Glasg

    S. Patel,Double Hilbert transforms along polynomial surfaces in R3, Glasg. Math. J.50(2008), 395–428

    2008

  30. [38]

    Ricci, E

    F. Ricci, E. M. Stein,Multiparameter singular integrals and maximal functions, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)42(1992), 637–670

    1992

  31. [39]

    E. M. Stein, Stephen Wainger,Problems in harmonic analysis related to curvature, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.84(1978), no. 6,1239–1295

    1978

  32. [40]

    E. M. Stein, S. Wainger,Discrete analogues of singular Radon transforms, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.,23 (1990), 537–544

    1990

  33. [41]

    E. M. Stein, S. Wainger,Discrete Analogues in Harmonic Analysis, I:ℓ2 Estimates for Singular Radon Transforms, Amer. J. Math121(1999)

    1999

  34. [42]

    Szemerédi, On sets of integers containing no k elements in arithmetic progression

    E. Szemerédi, On sets of integers containing no k elements in arithmetic progression. Acta Arith. 27 (1975)

    1975

  35. [43]

    I. M. Vinogradov,The Method of Trigonometric Sums in Number Theory, 2nd ed., Nauka, Moscow 1980; English transl.: Selected works, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1985)

    1980

  36. [44]

    Tao,The Ionescu–Wainger multiplier theorem and the adeles, Mathematika,63(2021), no.3, 557–737

    T. Tao,The Ionescu–Wainger multiplier theorem and the adeles, Mathematika,63(2021), no.3, 557–737

    2021

  37. [45]

    Zygmund,An individual ergodic theorem for non-commutative transformations, Acta Sci

    A. Zygmund,An individual ergodic theorem for non-commutative transformations, Acta Sci. Math. Szeged14(1951), 103–110. Joonil Kim, Department of Mathematics, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-729, Republic of Korea Email address:jikim7030@yonsei.ac.kr MULTI-PARAMETER EXPONENTIAL SU...

    1951

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.