Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 235 references

Specification Testing for Dyadic Regression Models

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A corrected Gaussian bootstrap makes dyadic specification tests valid in both dependence regimes.

desk verdict Strong bootstrap theory for dyadic specification tests, but the fixed-grid implementation does not deliver the advertised omnibus consistency. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26366 v1 pith:GMSSJGBH submitted 2026-07-29 econ.EM stat.ME

classification econ.EMstat.ME
keywords dyadicdataspecificationtestingresidual-markedempiricalprocessexchangeablearraysmultiplierbootstrapshared-nodedependenceKolmogorov-SmirnovtestCramér-vonMises
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds omnibus specification tests for linear conditional-mean models on undirected dyadic data, where observations sharing a node are dependent. The authors prove that the dyadic residual-marked process can be reduced uniformly to latent first-order node projections, and that a raw node-multiplier bootstrap works when those projections are nondegenerate. However, that bootstrap double-counts the variation of each dyad when dyads are actually independent. An exact covariance decomposition yields a corrected Gaussian bootstrap that is valid in both regimes. As a result, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramér-von Mises tests based on it are consistent against fixed alternatives and have nontrivial local power, with the corrected KS test showing the steadiest size control in simulations.

What carries the argument

The Aldous-Hoover-Kallenberg representation Z_ij = tau(U_i, U_j, U_ij) with i.i.d. latent node and dyad variables; the exact projection identity decomposing the dyadic empirical process into a node-average term plus a degenerate second-order remainder; the uniform negligibility of that remainder over VC-type classes (via a Rademacher process and a decoupled Rademacher chaos); and the finite-sample covariance decomposition Var(sqrt(n) P_n a) = 2/(n-1) V0 + 4(n-2)/(n-1) V1 that separates same-dyad from shared-node covariation and motivates the corrected covariance estimator.

What would settle it

Simulate independent dyads with n=50, compute the empirical rejection rate of the raw node-multiplier KS test at 5% under the null: the paper predicts it will be close to zero (conservative) because its critical values are sqrt(2) too large, while the corrected test should be near 5%; observing the raw test near 5% would contradict Theorem 5(c).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, under the Aldous-Hoover-Kallenberg representation of jointly exchangeable and dissociated undirected dyadic arrays, the feasible residual-marked empirical process is asymptotically driven by first-order node projections, so a bootstrap that multiplies centered incident-dyad averages by node-level multipliers reproduces the null distribution only when that node component is nondegenerate. When dyads are independent, the node projection vanishes and the raw multiplier bootstrap has twice the correct covariance. The paper shows that subtracting exactly one copy of the same-dyad covariance (via the finite-sample decomposition 2/(n-1)V0 + 4(n-2)/(n-1)V1) yields a Gaussi

Load-bearing premise

The entire projection reduction and bootstrap validity rest on Assumption 1: that the undirected dyadic array can be written as a symmetric function tau(U_i, U_j, U_ij) with independent node and dyad latent variables; if links are directed, or if node-level unobservables are correlated with the regressors, the node-projection reduction and the Gaussian bootstrap may fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Practitioners can test the linear conditional-mean specification in dyadic data without knowing whether node-level or dyad-level variation dominates; the corrected KS and CvM tests are asymptotically valid in both regimes.
  • The raw node-multiplier bootstrap, while valid under nondegenerate shared-node dependence, is asymptotically conservative under independent dyads because it doubles the same-dyad variance; its local power drops accordingly.
  • The naive dyad-multiplier bootstrap is invalid under shared-node dependence and should not be used when the dependence regime is unknown.
  • In the Lazega law-firm network, the tests reject additive linear and quadratic models but find no remaining misspecification after adding a shared-office-by-shared-practice interaction, pointing to complementarities among pair characteristics.
  • The tests are implemented on a fixed finite grid with one OLS estimation and no bandwidth choice, making them straightforward to apply.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Although the paper restricts to undirected dyads, a similar covariance-correction argument could plausibly be extended to directed dyadic data by working with ordered pairs and separating the two endpoint roles; the factor-of-two counting would become a factor-of-one per direction.
  • The factor-of-two correction is a general property of any node-level bootstrap that averages each observation through two endpoints; it may transfer to other dyadic inference problems, such as two-way cluster-robust testing, whenever the cluster-level component vanishes.
  • A testable extension is to allow the node-level and dyad-level variance components to mix in a single asymptotic framework rather than treating them as two separate regimes; the corrected bootstrap might be shown to adapt continuously as the node projection shrinks.
  • The authors explicitly exclude more general totally degenerate exchangeable arrays where a Gaussian chaos component becomes leading; constructing valid specification tests for those arrays would require a different bootstrap, possibly based on dyad-level multipliers with estimated variance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops omnibus specification tests for linear conditional-mean models on undirected dyadic data. The dyad array is modeled by an Aldous–Hoover–Kallenberg representation, and the test statistic is a residual-marked empirical process indexed by lower orthants of the regressor distribution. The paper proves a uniform projection theorem that reduces the dyadic process, uniformly over a VC-type class, to its first-order node projections; shows that a raw node-multiplier bootstrap is valid under nondegenerate shared-node dependence but double-counts dyad-specific variation under independent dyads; and proposes a corrected Gaussian bootstrap based on an exact covariance decomposition. The main theorems state uniform weak convergence, asymptotic size of the bootstrap tests, consistency against fixed alternatives for continuum KS and CvM functionals, and local-power results in both variance regimes. The paper also reports simulations and an application to the Lazega law-firm network.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a genuinely useful contribution: it extends residual-based omnibus specification testing to dyadic data while explicitly handling the two variance regimes (node-dominated and independent-dyad). The paper contains substantial technical work: the exact projection identity, the Rademacher/chaos chaining for the uniform remainder, the plug-in stability via a deterministic VC enlargement, and the covariance decomposition (30) are all detailed and internally consistent. The corrected bootstrap is derived from an exact identity rather than curve-fitted, and the factor-of-two inflation of the raw bootstrap under independent dyads is a crisp, falsifiable prediction. The paper also honestly states its scope boundaries (undirected links, AHK structure, exclusion of general totally degenerate arrays). The main shortcoming is that the headline 'omnibus' consistency claim is not established for the implemented fixed-grid procedure, a gap the paper itself acknowledges but does not close.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, §4, Eq. (27)] Theorem 3 proves consistency only for the continuum statistics T_KS = sup_X |√n bR_n(x)| and T_CvM = n∫ bR_n^2 dν. The implemented statistics in (27) replace X by a fixed deterministic grid X_G. For any fixed grid, there exist fixed alternatives with Δ(x_g)=0 at all grid points but sup_X |Δ|>0 (e.g., X=[0,1], Δ(x)=c·sin(5πx), grid {0,0.2,0.4,0.6,0.8,1}). For such alternatives the grid statistic converges to 0 while bootstrap critical values are O_p(1), so the rejection probability does not tend to 1. The paper states in §3.2 that grid consistency would require the grid to capture the departure, but it provides no growing-grid or data-dependent-grid theorem. This is load-bearing because the abstract claims unqualified omnibus consistency for the delivered procedure.
  2. [Abstract, Theorem 3] The CvM consistency statement is overstated. Theorem 3 gives consistency of the continuum CvM functional only under the extra condition ∫ Δ^2 dν>0. For a fixed finite measure ν, there are fixed alternatives with Δ not identically zero but ∫ Δ^2 dν=0, so the CvM test cannot detect every fixed violation. The abstract's unqualified claim that 'the resulting Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramér-von Mises tests are consistent against fixed alternatives' should be qualified by the support condition on ν or by choosing ν with full support.
  3. [§4.4, Theorem 6] The local-power theorem relies on the high-level condition 'Assumptions 1-4 hold uniformly along the local alternatives in (40)' and on the covariance kernel of the centered process converging to that of G_R or G_D. No primitive conditions are given for this uniformity, and the proof in Appendix C simply states that the local perturbation is o(1). This makes the local-power claims conditional on an unverified uniformity assumption. The issue is secondary to the grid gap, but it should be formalized or explicitly deferred.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract has a typographical artifact: 'Cram\'er' should be 'Cramér'.
  2. [§5.1] The local-power simulations use γ_n = h/√n, which corresponds to scenario (i). The independent-dyad local-power predictions of Theorem 6(b) are not simulated; adding a small ω=0 power panel would make the boundary behavior of the corrected test more concrete.
  3. [§4.2, Algorithm 2] The positive-semidefinite projection is described verbally. Please state explicitly that Π_+ replaces negative eigenvalues by zero, and note that the projection is applied to the estimated covariance matrix before the Gaussian draw.
  4. [§6, Table 1] The discussion of the naive dyad bootstrap p-value 0.030 in the last row is clear, but consider labeling it explicitly as an invalid benchmark in the table notes to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the corrected bootstrap is derived from an exact covariance identity, and the grid-based omnibus gap is a scope limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The uniform projection limit (Lemma 3) follows from the exact projection identity (10) plus an i.i.d. empirical-process CLT over latent node projections, with the second-order remainder shown negligible uniformly (Lemma 2) by decoupling and chaining arguments. The raw node-multiplier bootstrap is validated through uniform recovery of node projections (Lemma 9), plug-in stability (Lemma 6), and conditional functional convergence; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The corrected Gaussian bootstrap is not calibrated to make the test have size; its covariance matrix (34) is exactly the finite-sample covariance decomposition (30), and the factor-of-two raw-bootstrap inflation under independence (39) is a derived consequence of that identity, not an input. The local-power drift μΔ in (41) is defined by projecting the local departure onto the orthogonalized instruments and then appears as a deterministic shift in Theorem 6; the bootstrap critical values are not fitted to this drift. The only self-citation (Hounyo and Lin 2026) appears in a related-literature list and as an example of leading variance regimes in Assumption 3; it is not load-bearing for any theorem. The one genuine limitation is not circularity: Theorem 3 proves consistency only for continuum KS/CvM, while the implemented tests use a fixed grid X_G. Section 3.2 explicitly concedes that 'Establishing consistency of the implemented grid tests additionally requires the grid to capture the departure,' and no growing-grid theorem is provided, so the abstract's unqualified 'omnibus' claim is stronger than the delivered fixed-grid result supports. That is a scope/strength gap, not a reduction of the output to the input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical or structural entities are proposed. The latent node variables come from the existing AHK representation, and the 'node projections' are standard Hoeffding projections, not invented objects.

free parameters (2)
  • evaluation grid G = chosen by researcher ('sufficiently fine')
    Implemented tests depend on a fixed grid X_G; consistency against fixed alternatives requires the grid to capture the departure, which is not guaranteed by the theory (p.12–13).
  • CvM weights w_g = default equal weights 1/G
    The CvM statistic depends on the chosen measure ν_G; default is uniform but no optimality or data-driven rule is given (p.14).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Assumption 1: AHK representation; dyadic array jointly exchangeable and dissociated
    The whole projection theory builds on i.i.d. latent node and dyad variables. If violated, Lemma 7 and the process limits fail.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2: bounded regressors, Y has 4+δ moments, Q nonsingular
    Powers the VC-type entropy and moment bounds; E|Y|^{4+δ} used in bootstrap covariance estimation (Section 2.3, Appendix B).
  • domain assumption Assumption 3: two variance regimes (nonzero node component at some x, or fully independent dyads)
    Limits validity claim: more general totally degenerate exchangeable arrays with leading Gaussian chaos are explicitly excluded (p.29).
  • domain assumption Assumption 4: quantile continuity and strict increase of limiting distributions; grid covariance nonzero
    Ensures bootstrap quantile consistency and nondegenerate grid statistics (Section 4.3).
  • standard math Standard empirical-process tools: VC-type entropy, Dudley chaining, decoupling, hypercontractivity
    Used in Lemma 2 and Appendix A proofs; assumed background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Specification Testing for Dyadic Regression Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GMSSJGBH

@misc{pith2026260726366,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Specification Testing for Dyadic Regression Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GMSSJGBH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26366}
}
read the original abstract

This paper develops omnibus specification tests for linear conditional-mean models with undirected dyadic data. We establish a uniform projection theorem that reduces the dyadic process to its latent first-order node projections under shared-node dependence. We then show that a raw first-order node-multiplier bootstrap is valid when this node component is nondegenerate but double-counts dyad-specific variation when dyads are independent. An exact covariance decomposition motivates a corrected Gaussian bootstrap that is valid in both regimes. The resulting Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cram\'er-von Mises tests are consistent against fixed alternatives and have nontrivial power against rate-appropriate local alternatives. Simulations show that the corrected Kolmogorov-Smirnov test provides the most stable size control while retaining substantial local power. An application to the Lazega law-firm network rejects additive linear and quadratic specifications but finds no remaining misspecification after including an economically relevant interaction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26366 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Null rejection probabilities. The nominal significance level is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rejection probabilities under the local alternatives [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

235 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Can mutual fund “stars” really pick stocks? New evidence from a bootstrap analysis , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  2. [2]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Luck versus skill in the cross-section of mutual fund returns , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  3. [3]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964 , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1968 , publisher=

  4. [4]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1970 , publisher=

  5. [5]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Luck versus Skill in the Cross Section of Mutual Fund Returns: Reexamining the Evidence , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  6. [6]

    Econometrica , volume=

    The model confidence set , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  7. [7]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Picking funds with confidence , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  8. [8]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Cross-sectional alpha dispersion and performance evaluation , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

Show all 235 references
  1. [9]

    Econometrica , volume=

    A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelationconsistent covariance matrix , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

  2. [10]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    False (and missed) discoveries in Financial economics , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  3. [11]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Bootstrap analysis of mutual fund performance , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  4. [12]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    A first look at the accuracy of the CRSP mutual fund database and a comparison of the CRSP and Morningstar mutual fund databases , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

  5. [13]

    Econometrica , volume=

    A reality check for data snooping , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

  6. [14]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    On persistence in mutual fund performance , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

  7. [15]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Can hedge funds time market liquidity? , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  8. [16]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Performance and persistence in institutional investment management , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  9. [17]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Fundamental analysis and the cross-section of stock returns: A data-mining approach , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  10. [18]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Do mutual funds time the market? Evidence from portfolio holdings , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  11. [19]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Panel data models with interactive fixed effects , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  12. [20]

    Economics letters , volume=

    Evaluating the size of the bootstrap method for fund performance evaluation , author=. Economics letters , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  13. [21]

    1977 , publisher=

    Exploratory data analysis , author=. 1977 , publisher=

  14. [22]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Asset pricing with liquidity risk , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

  15. [23]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Volatility timing in mutual funds: Evidence from daily returns , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

  16. [24]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  17. [25]

    1992 , publisher=

    Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife , author=. 1992 , publisher=

  18. [26]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

  19. [27]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Bootstrapping integrated covariance matrix estimators in noisy jump--diffusion models with non-synchronous trading , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  20. [28]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    A local Gaussian bootstrap method for realized volatility and realized beta , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  21. [29]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    Bootstrapping pre-averaged realized volatility under market microstructure noise , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  22. [30]

    Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Forthcoming , year=

    Are Some Forecasters Really Better than Others? A Note , author=. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Forthcoming , year=

  23. [31]

    Available at SSRN 3523293 , year=

    Bootstrapping Laplace transforms of volatility , author=. Available at SSRN 3523293 , year=

  24. [32]

    Annals of Statistics , volume=

    Bootstrap procedures under some non-iid models , author=. Annals of Statistics , volume=. 1988 , publisher=

  25. [33]

    Annals of Statistics , volume=

    Jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling methods in regression analysis , author=. Annals of Statistics , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

  26. [34]

    Annals of Statistics , volume=

    Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , author=. Annals of Statistics , volume=. 1979 , publisher=

  27. [35]

    Annals of Statistics , volume=

    Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models , author=. Annals of Statistics , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

  28. [36]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    The wild bootstrap, tamed at last , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  29. [37]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Reassessing false discoveries in mutual fund performance: Skill, luck, or lack of power? , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  30. [38]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    False discoveries in mutual fund performance: Measuring luck in estimated alphas , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  31. [39]

    Journal of Finance, Forthcoming , year=

    Reassessing false discoveries in mutual fund performance: Skill, luck, or lack of power? A reply , author=. Journal of Finance, Forthcoming , year=

  32. [40]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Thousands of alpha tests , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  33. [41]

    Annals of Statistics , volume=

    Phase transition and regularized bootstrap in large-scale -tests with false discovery rate control , author=. Annals of Statistics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  34. [42]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Power enhancement in high-dimensional cross-sectional tests , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  35. [43]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    The size distortion of bootstrap tests , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

  36. [44]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Alpha and performance measurement: The effects of investor disagreement and heterogeneity , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  37. [45]

    Review of Asset Pricing Studies , volume=

    Mutual fund industry selection and persistence , author=. Review of Asset Pricing Studies , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  38. [46]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Mutual fund performance: An empirical decomposition into stock-picking talent, style, transactions costs, and expenses , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

  39. [47]

    Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=

    The value of active mutual fund management: An examination of the stockholdings and trades of fund managers , author=. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

  40. [48]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

  41. [49]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Technical trading revisited: False discoveries, persistence tests, and transaction costs , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  42. [50]

    The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

    Multiple testing , author=. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Forthcoming , year=

  43. [51]

    Test , volume=

    Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling , author=. Test , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  44. [52]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    Formalized data snooping based on generalized error rates , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  45. [53]

    Scandinavian Journal of Statistics , pages=

    A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure , author=. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics , pages=. 1979 , publisher=

  46. [54]

    Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological) , volume=

    Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , author=. Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological) , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

  47. [55]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    … and the cross-section of expected returns , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  48. [56]

    Multiple testing in economics , author=

  49. [57]

    Handbook of Financial Econometrics, Mathematics, Statistics, and Machine Learning , pages=

    How many good and bad funds are there, really? , author=. Handbook of Financial Econometrics, Mathematics, Statistics, and Machine Learning , pages=. 2021 , publisher=

  50. [58]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Detecting repeatable performance , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  51. [59]

    Annals of Statistics , volume=

    Improved central limit theorem and bootstrap approximations in high dimensions , author=. Annals of Statistics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  52. [60]

    Review of Finance , volume=

    Investing in a global world , author=. Review of Finance , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  53. [61]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Decentralized investment management: Evidence from the pension fund industry , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  54. [62]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Anomalies and false rejections , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  55. [63]

    Journal of Money, Credit and Banking , volume=

    Are some forecasters really better than others? , author=. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  56. [64]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Do hedge funds deliver alpha? A Bayesian and bootstrap analysis , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  57. [65]

    Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=

    New evidence on mutual fund performance: A comparison of alternative bootstrap methods , author=. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  58. [66]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Improved inference in the evaluation of mutual fund performance using panel bootstrap methods , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  59. [67]

    The Fama Portfolio: Selected Papers of Eugene F

    Luck versus Skill and Factor Selection , author=. The Fama Portfolio: Selected Papers of Eugene F. Fama , year=

  60. [68]

    Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=

    Using stocks or portfolios in tests of factor models , author=. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  61. [69]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Fund flows and market states , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  62. [70]

    2009 , institution=

    Is investor rationality time varying? Evidence from the mutual fund industry , author=. 2009 , institution=

  63. [71]

    Journal of Finance, Forthcoming , pages=

    Time-Varying Fund Manager Skill , author=. Journal of Finance, Forthcoming , pages=

  64. [72]

    Econometrica , volume=

    A rational theory of mutual funds' attention allocation , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  65. [73]

    Review of Finance , volume=

    Improved forecasting of mutual fund alphas and betas , author=. Review of Finance , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  66. [74]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Estimating the dynamics of mutual fund alphas and betas , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  67. [75]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    The persistence of mutual fund performance , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

  68. [76]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Mutual fund competition, managerial skill, and alpha persistence , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  69. [77]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Evaluating mutual fund performance , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

  70. [78]

    Mutual fund performance: evidence from the

    Blake, David and Timmermann, Allan , journal=. Mutual fund performance: evidence from the. 1998 , publisher=

  71. [79]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Are some mutual fund managers better than others? Cross-sectional patterns in behavior and performance , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

  72. [80]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Another puzzle: The growth in actively managed mutual funds , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

  73. [81]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

  74. [82]

    Journal of business , pages=

    Mutual fund performance: An analysis of quarterly portfolio holdings , author=. Journal of business , pages=. 1989 , publisher=

  75. [83]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    On the timing ability of mutual fund managers , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

  76. [84]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Data-snooping, technical trading rule performance, and the bootstrap , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

  77. [85]

    Journal of Financial Econometrics , volume=

    Improving tests of abnormal returns by bootstrapping the multivariate regression model with event parameters , author=. Journal of Financial Econometrics , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

  78. [86]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Testing the predictive power of dividend yields , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

  79. [87]

    Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=

    Is technical analysis in the foreign exchange market profitable? A genetic programming approach , author=. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

  80. [88]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Simple technical trading rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

  81. [89]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Monotonicity in asset returns: New tests with applications to the term structure, the CAPM, and portfolio sorts , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  82. [90]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Book-to-market, dividend yield, and expected market returns: A time-series analysis , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

  83. [91]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971 to 1991 , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

  84. [92]

    2012 , institution=

    Should benchmark indices have alpha? Revisiting performance evaluation , author=. 2012 , institution=

  85. [93]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    How active is your fund manager? A new measure that predicts performance , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  86. [94]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Hot hands in mutual funds: Short-run persistence of relative performance, 1974--1988 , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

  87. [95]

    Journal of Financial Markets , volume=

    Do mutual fund managers time market liquidity? , author=. Journal of Financial Markets , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  88. [96]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Market timing ability and volatility implied in investment newsletters' asset allocation recommendations , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

  89. [97]

    Journal of Financial Markets , volume=

    Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects , author=. Journal of Financial Markets , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  90. [98]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Anomalies across the globe: Once public, no longer existent? , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  91. [99]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Digesting anomalies: An investment approach , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  92. [100]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Does academic research destroy stock return predictability? , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  93. [101]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    The moving blocks bootstrap for panel linear regression models with individual fixed effects , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  94. [102]

    2006 , publisher=

    Bootstrap methods in econometrics , author=. 2006 , publisher=

  95. [103]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    The stationary bootstrap , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

  96. [104]

    Journal of Political Economy , volume=

    Liquidity risk and expected stock returns , author=. Journal of Political Economy , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

  97. [105]

    Harvard Business Review , volume=

    Can mutual funds outguess the market , author=. Harvard Business Review , volume=

  98. [106]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    The dependent wild bootstrap , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  99. [107]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    A wild bootstrap for dependent data , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  100. [108]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Estimating the variance of a combined forecast: Bootstrap-based approach , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  101. [109]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Private equity performance: Returns, persistence, and capital flows , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

  102. [110]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Wild bootstrap and asymptotic inference with multiway clustering , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  103. [111]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Robust inference with multiway clustering , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  104. [112]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Bootstrap with cluster-dependence in two or more dimensions , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  105. [113]

    The Review of Economics and Statistics , pages =. 2024 , abstract =

    Chiang, Harold D. and Hansen, Bruce E. and Sasaki, Yuya , title = ". The Review of Economics and Statistics , pages =. 2024 , abstract = ". doi:10.1162/rest_a_01507 , url =

  106. [114]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  107. [115]

    Annals of Statistics , volume=

    Empirical process results for exchangeable arrays , author=. Annals of Statistics , volume=

  108. [116]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Linear panel regressions with two-way unobserved heterogeneity , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  109. [117]

    This shock is different: Estimation and inference in misspecified two-way fixed effects panel regressions , author=

  110. [118]

    Bernoulli , pages=

    Resampling and exchangeable arrays , author=. Bernoulli , pages=. 2000 , publisher=

  111. [119]

    The Annuals of Applied Statistics , pages=

    The pigeonhole bootstrap , author=. The Annuals of Applied Statistics , pages=

  112. [120]

    Quantitative Economics , volume=

    Bootstrap inference under cross-sectional dependence , author=. Quantitative Economics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  113. [121]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Fixed-b asymptotics for panel models with two-way clustering , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  114. [122]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

  115. [123]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Are all ratings created equal? The impact of issuer size on the pricing of mortgage-backed securities , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  116. [124]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    On the direct and indirect real effects of credit supply shocks , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  117. [125]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Does the lack of financial stability impair the transmission of monetary policy? , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  118. [126]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Growth opportunities, technology shocks, and asset prices , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  119. [127]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Product market competition, insider trading, and stock market efficiency , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  120. [128]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    Pledgeability and asset prices: Evidence from the Chinese corporate bond markets , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  121. [129]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Pre-colonial ethnic institutions and contemporary African development , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  122. [130]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Nonhomotheticity and bilateral trade: Evidence and a quantitative explanation , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  123. [131]

    The Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches , author=. The Review of Financial Studies , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  124. [132]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    Growth opportunities and technology shocks , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  125. [133]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    Conflict and intergroup trade: Evidence from the 2014 Russia-Ukraine crisis , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  126. [134]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    Credit spreads and business cycle fluctuations , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  127. [135]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  128. [136]

    Journal of Labor Economics , volume=

    School finance equalization increases intergenerational mobility , author=. Journal of Labor Economics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  129. [137]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    National institutions and subnational development in Africa , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  130. [138]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Does religion affect economic growth and happiness? Evidence from Ramadan , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  131. [139]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  132. [140]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Bargaining, sorting, and the gender wage gap: Quantifying the impact of firms on the relative pay of women , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  133. [141]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    The diffusion of development , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  134. [142]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Cluster-robust inference: A guide to empirical practice , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  135. [143]

    Econometrics and Statistics , volume=

    Fast cluster bootstrap methods for linear regression models , author=. Econometrics and Statistics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  136. [144]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Asymptotic theory and wild bootstrap inference with clustered errors , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  137. [145]

    Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=

    The likelihood ratio test under nonstandard conditions: testing the Markov switching model of GNP , author=. Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

  138. [146]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    The long-term effects of Africa's slave trades , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  139. [147]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  140. [148]

    Recent advances and future directions in causality, prediction, and specification analysis: Essays in honor of Halbert L

    Thirty years of heteroskedasticity-robust inference , author=. Recent advances and future directions in causality, prediction, and specification analysis: Essays in honor of Halbert L. White Jr , pages=. 2012 , publisher=

  141. [149]

    Biometrics , pages=

    Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes , author=. Biometrics , pages=. 1986 , publisher=

  142. [150]

    Oxford bulletin of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators , author=. Oxford bulletin of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 1987 , publisher=

  143. [151]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

  144. [152]

    Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=

    A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity , author=. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=. 1980 , publisher=

  145. [153]

    Annals of Statistics , pages=

    The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations , author=. Annals of Statistics , pages=. 1989 , publisher=

  146. [154]

    2022 , publisher=

    Econometrics , author=. 2022 , publisher=

  147. [155]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    Block bootstrap HAC robust tests: The sophistication of the naive bootstrap , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  148. [156]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Wild bootstrap tests for IV regression , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  149. [157]

    The Econometrics Journal , volume=

    The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters , author=. The Econometrics Journal , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  150. [158]

    2022 , institution=

    Jackknife standard errors for clustered regression , author=. 2022 , institution=

  151. [159]

    Journal of human resources , volume=

    A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference , author=. Journal of human resources , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  152. [160]

    Exploring the limits of bootstrap , volume=

    Moving blocks jackknife and bootstrap capture weak dependence , author=. Exploring the limits of bootstrap , volume=

  153. [161]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Time-varying risk premium in large cross-sectional equity data sets , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  154. [162]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    Asymptotic behavior of at-test robust to cluster heterogeneity , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  155. [163]

    small” number of “large

    The wild bootstrap with a “small” number of “large” clusters , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  156. [164]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Asymptotic theory for clustered samples , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  157. [165]

    Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=

    Fast and reliable jackknife and bootstrap methods for cluster-robust inference , author=. Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  158. [166]

    1984 , publisher=

    Asymptotic Theory for Econometricians , author=. 1984 , publisher=

  159. [167]

    Bias and confidence in not quite large samples , author=. Ann. Math. Statist. , volume=

  160. [168]

    Biometrika , volume=

    Nonparametric estimates of standard error: the jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods , author=. Biometrika , volume=. 1981 , publisher=

  161. [169]

    The Annals of Statistics , pages=

    The jackknife estimate of variance , author=. The Annals of Statistics , pages=. 1981 , publisher=

  162. [170]

    Journal of econometrics , volume=

    Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties , author=. Journal of econometrics , volume=. 1985 , publisher=

  163. [171]

    Survey Methodology , volume=

    Bias reduction in standard errors for linear regression with multi-stage samples , author=. Survey Methodology , volume=

  164. [172]

    The Stata Journal , volume=

    Leverage, influence, and the jackknife in clustered regression models: Reliable inference using summclust , author=. The Stata Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  165. [173]

    Journal of Econometrics , pages=

    Multiway empirical likelihood , author=. Journal of Econometrics , pages=. 2024 , publisher=

  166. [174]

    the Annals of Probability , volume=

    Dependent central limit theorems and invariance principles , author=. the Annals of Probability , volume=. 1974 , publisher=

  167. [175]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08880 , year=

    Jackknife inference with two-way clustering , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08880 , year=

  168. [176]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Inference for high-dimensional exchangeable arrays , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  169. [177]

    2024 , institution=

    A Jackknife Variance Estimator for Panel Regressions , author=. 2024 , institution=

  170. [178]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    On the jackknife-after-bootstrap method for dependent data and its consistency properties , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  171. [179]

    Review of Economic Studies , volume=

    Using disasters to estimate the impact of uncertainty , author=. Review of Economic Studies , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  172. [180]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13775 , year=

    On Using The Two-Way Cluster-Robust Standard Errors , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13775 , year=

  173. [181]

    2024 , journal=

    Standard errors for difference-in-difference regression , author=. 2024 , journal=

  174. [182]

    2022 , publisher=

    Probability and statistics for economists , author=. 2022 , publisher=

  175. [183]

    1981 , publisher=

    A second course in stochastic processes , author=. 1981 , publisher=

  176. [184]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Wild bootstrap inference with multiway clustering and serially correlated time effects , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

  177. [185]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    The bootstrap of the mean for dependent heterogeneous arrays , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  178. [186]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    The moving blocks bootstrap and robust inference for linear least squares and quantile regressions , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

  179. [187]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Confidence bands for ROC curves with serially dependent data , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  180. [188]

    Economics Letters , volume=

    Asymptotic variance of Brier (skill) score in the presence of serial correlation , author=. Economics Letters , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  181. [189]

    The Stata Journal , volume=

    Fast and wild: Bootstrap inference in Stata using boottest , author=. The Stata Journal , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  182. [190]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20749 , year=

    Analytic inference with two-way clustering , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20749 , year=

  183. [191]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10138 , year=

    Genuinely Robust Inference for Clustered Data , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10138 , year=

  184. [192]

    2026 , publisher=

    Two-Way Clustering with Non-Exchangeable Data , author=. 2026 , publisher=

  185. [193]

    Political analysis , volume=

    Cluster--robust variance estimation for dyadic data , author=. Political analysis , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  186. [194]

    Unpublished manuscript, University of California-Davis , volume=

    Robust inference for dyadic data , author=. Unpublished manuscript, University of California-Davis , volume=

  187. [195]

    Journal of Multivariate Analysis , volume=

    Representations for partially exchangeable arrays of random variables , author=. Journal of Multivariate Analysis , volume=. 1981 , publisher=

  188. [196]

    t, Institute for Advanced Study , year=

    Relations on Probability Spaces and Arrays of , author=. t, Institute for Advanced Study , year=

  189. [197]

    Journal of Multivariate Analysis , volume=

    On the representation theorem for exchangeable arrays , author=. Journal of Multivariate Analysis , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

  190. [198]

    Available at SSRN 5046919 , year=

    Jackknife Variance Estimators for Two-Way Clustering with Serially Correlated Time Effects , author=. Available at SSRN 5046919 , year=

  191. [199]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Sparse network asymptotics for logistic regression under possible misspecification , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  192. [200]

    Journal of development Economics , volume=

    The formation of risk sharing networks , author=. Journal of development Economics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  193. [201]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Inference with dyadic data: Asymptotic behavior of the dyadic-robust t-statistic , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  194. [202]

    1962 , publisher=

    Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy , author=. 1962 , publisher=

  195. [203]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation , author=. American Economic Review , volume=

  196. [204]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle , author=. American Economic Review , volume=

  197. [205]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    The Log of Gravity , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

  198. [206]

    Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes , author=. Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

  199. [207]

    Journal of International Economics , volume=

    Structural Gravity and Fixed Effects , author=. Journal of International Economics , volume=

  200. [208]

    CEPII Working Paper , number=

    The CEPII Gravity Database , author=. CEPII Working Paper , number=

  201. [209]

    Journal of international Economics , volume=

    Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? , author=. Journal of international Economics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  202. [210]

    Journal of international economics , volume=

    New measures of trade creation and trade diversion , author=. Journal of international economics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  203. [211]

    Journal of international Economics , volume=

    Interdependent preferential trade agreement memberships: An empirical analysis , author=. Journal of international Economics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  204. [212]

    Zeitschrift f

    Limiting behavior of U-statistics for stationary, absolutely regular processes , author=. Zeitschrift f

  205. [213]

    2012 , publisher=

    Decoupling: from dependence to independence , author=. 2012 , publisher=

  206. [214]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    A consistent test of functional form via nonparametric estimation techniques , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

  207. [215]

    Weak convergence and empirical processes: with applications to statistics , pages=

    Weak convergence , author=. Weak convergence and empirical processes: with applications to statistics , pages=. 1996 , publisher=

  208. [216]

    The Annals of Statistics , pages=

    Nonparametric model checks for regression , author=. The Annals of Statistics , pages=. 1997 , publisher=

  209. [217]

    2005 , publisher=

    Probabilistic symmetries and invariance principles , author=. 2005 , publisher=

  210. [218]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    A CONSISTENT DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR REGRESSION MODELS USINGPROJECTIONS , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  211. [219]

    Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=

    A consistent conditional moment test of functional form , author=. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=. 1990 , publisher=

  212. [220]

    Annual review of sociology , volume=

    Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks , author=. Annual review of sociology , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

  213. [221]

    2008 , publisher=

    Social and economic networks , author=. 2008 , publisher=

  214. [222]

    Econometrica , volume=

    An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  215. [223]

    2001 , publisher=

    The collegial phenomenon: The social mechanisms of cooperation among peers in a corporate law partnership , author=. 2001 , publisher=

  216. [224]

    2021 , institution=

    Minimax risk and uniform convergence rates for nonparametric dyadic regression , author=. 2021 , institution=

  217. [225]

    Handbook of econometrics , volume=

    Network data , author=. Handbook of econometrics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  218. [226]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Kernel density estimation for undirected dyadic data , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  219. [227]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Consistent model specification tests , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 1982 , publisher=

  220. [228]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Specification test for spatial autoregressive models , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  221. [229]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Model checking in partially linear spatial autoregressive models , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  222. [230]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    Consistent specification testing under spatial dependence , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  223. [231]

    Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society , pages=

    Consistent model specification tests: omitted variables and semiparametric functional forms , author=. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society , pages=. 1996 , publisher=

  224. [232]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Consistent bootstrap tests of parametric regression functions , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

  225. [233]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Consequences and detection of misspecified nonlinear regression models , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 1981 , publisher=

  226. [234]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Profile quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of partially linear spatial autoregressive models , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  227. [235]

    Econometric Theory , volume=

    Heteroskedasticity robust specification testing in spatial autoregression , author=. Econometric Theory , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.