Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Rigorous justification of the hydrostatic-incompressible approximation for weakly stratified isothermal flow

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that, for weakly stratified isothermal compressible flows in the small-Mach, small-aspect-ratio regime, solutions exist uniformly in the small parameter and converge to the incompressible primitive equations, with no restr

desk verdict A genuinely hard three-scale singular-limit proof, but the advertised convergence is for the eddy-viscosity model, not the anisotropic system the nondimensionalization actually yields. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27477 v1 pith:LWJH3R2B submitted 2026-07-29 math.AP

Quyuan Lin , Xin Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3035Q8676D0576N1076N30
keywords SingularlimitIncompressibleHydrostaticapproximationPrimitiveequationsIsothermalflowAcousticwavesThree-scalewaveseparationWeakstratification
topics Navier-Stokes Regularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to justify the hydrostatic-incompressible approximation—the passage from the isothermal compressible Navier–Stokes equations to the incompressible primitive equations—in the physical regime where the Mach number, Froude number, and vertical-to-horizontal aspect ratio are all of the same small order ε and stratification is weak. The authors claim that, for any fixed small ε, the system admits a unique strong solution on a time interval that does not shrink as ε→0, with no restriction on the size of the initial wave components. They further claim that, as ε→0, the solutions converge (along a subsequence) to the unique solution of the primitive equations (1.2). The reason to care: the primitive equations are the standard model for large-scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics, and this gives a proof that the model is the actual limit of the compressible system in this regime.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the wave-decomposition framework of Definition 3.1: the horizontal acoustic projection P_ha, built on ∇_h Δ_h^{-1} div_h; the vertical acoustic projection P^ε_va, built on the ε-dependent elliptic operator (ε² Δ_h + ∂_zz)^{-1}; and the slow-wave projection P^ε_σ. These projections split the linear system (3.8) into the three separated time scales. The nonlinear analysis then runs on two lemmas: the weighted energy estimate (Lemma 3.3), where the factor e^{-εg} removes the singular gravity coupling, and the acoustic-wave energy estimate (Lemma 3.4), which provides the missing control of ∂_z q/ε, ε∂_t q, and w via equation (3.3).

What would settle it

Simulate (1.1) with data satisfying (3.4) for ε = 10^{-2}, 10^{-3}, 10^{-4}; if the H^2 error between the horizontal velocity and a reference solution of (1.2) does not decay to zero (or the uniform bound (3.6) fails for some ε), the convergence theorem is false. As a complementary check, impose a small vertical acoustic perturbation and verify the dispersion relation (3.12): the vertical acoustic frequency must scale as |k_3|/ε², not ε^{-1}; a different scaling would falsify the three-wave separation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2: for the eddy-viscosity system (1.1), under the symmetry (SYM) and the weak-stratification hypothesis ∂_z g, ∂_zz g, ∂_zzz g = O(ε), initial data with bounded energy functional (3.4) yield unique strong solutions on an ε-independent time interval with the uniform bound (3.6); and as ε→0 the slow part of the solution converges to a strong solution of the incompressible primitive equations (1.2). The mechanism is a three-wave decomposition of the linearized dynamics—a slow/mean wave, a fast horizontal acoustic wave at frequency O(1/ε), and a very fast vertical acoustic wave at frequency O(1/ε²)—whose projection operators are non-orthogonal and d

Load-bearing premise

The central theorem applies to the modified isotropic eddy-viscosity system (1.1), not to the physically derived anisotropic viscosity (2.11); if that artificial viscosity is the reason the acoustic estimates close, the literal 'compressible Navier–Stokes' justification remains incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The incompressible primitive equations (1.2) are the rigorous asymptotic limit of the isothermal compressible Navier–Stokes system (1.1) in the weakly stratified, small-Mach, small-aspect-ratio regime, for general initial data without restrictions on wave size.
  • For any fixed small ε the system is uniformly well-posed on an ε-independent time interval, with the quantitative bound (3.6); this makes the singular limit amenable to numerical schemes that filter fast waves.
  • The weak-stratification condition ∂_z g = O(ε) is more than technical: Section 6.2 shows that with ∂_z g = N ≠ 0 the vertical acoustic mode grows at rate ≈ |N|/(2ε), so the leading-order limit is not the primitive equations for such data.
  • Viscosity is indispensable: the inviscid version (Section 6.1) contains growing modes with λ = 1/ε, so no convergence can be expected without dissipation.
  • The isentropic (γ > 1) case is not covered: Remark 4.1 shows the acoustic estimate fails to close there, leaving the extension to non-isothermal or isentropic flows open.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: The main theorem does not apply to the anisotropic viscosity system (2.11) derived from the physical scaling; because Remark 3.4 identifies the degenerate horizontal viscosity in the vertical momentum equation as the obstruction, a natural test is whether a modified weighted estimate can restore the acoustic bound and extend the result to the original viscosity.
  • Editorial: The ε-dependent, non-orthogonal wave projections introduced here may serve as a template for other anisotropic singular limits, where the natural slow/fast/very-fast split cannot be made ε-independent.
  • Editorial: The instability calculations in Section 6 suggest a sharp borderline: one could try to prove that if ∂_z g decays more slowly than O(ε), the primitive-equations limit fails for the same class of data, making the paper's gravity condition necessary as well as sufficient.
  • Editorial: A concrete, cheap test of the three-scale separation would be a spectral simulation of the linear system (3.8) measuring the vertical acoustic frequency at O(ε^{-2}) for a fixed mode; agreement with (3.12) would independently confirm the central mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the singular limit, as σ=Ma=Fr=ε→0, of a dimensionless isothermal compressible Navier-Stokes system in a periodic cylinder, with the goal of rigorously deriving the incompressible hydrostatic primitive equations. After reformulating the density through q=g+(1/ε)logρ, the authors identify a three-scale linear wave structure: a slow divergence-free mode, a fast horizontal acoustic mode, and a very fast vertical acoustic mode. The main results, Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2, state uniform-in-ε existence of strong solutions on an ε-independent time interval and convergence, up to subsequence, to a solution of the primitive equations (1.2). The proof combines a weighted energy estimate, a second-order acoustic-wave estimate, and a compactness argument using non-orthogonal ε-dependent projections. The paper also contains formal asymptotics (Section 2) and two linear instability analyses (Section 6) indicating why the inviscid and general-gravity cases are excluded.

Significance. If correct, the result is a substantive contribution to the hydrostatic/incompressible limit for weakly stratified compressible flows: it goes beyond well-prepared data, handles large initial waves, and identifies the three-scale projection structure caused by the anisotropic aspect ratio. The paper is unusually explicit about its limitations: Remark 3.4 states that the physical anisotropic viscosity is not treated, and Section 6 gives concrete linear mechanisms for non-convergence in the inviscid and constant-gravity-gradient regimes. These admissions are a strength, but they also delimit the actual scope of the proof. The main theorems are internally coherent for the eddy-viscosity system (1.1), but the advertised claim for 'the compressible Navier-Stokes system' is broader than what is proved.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1 (Remark 3.4), §2.1 (2.11), Theorems 1.1/3.1] The central theorems are proved for the eddy-viscosity system (1.1), not for the physical anisotropic system (2.11) obtained by nondimensionalization. This is not a harmless simplification: in the vertical momentum equation (2.11c) the horizontal viscosity is the degenerate operator div_h(ε²∇h w), whereas the analysis uses the isotropic ε²Δw in (3.2c). The acoustic energy estimate Lemma 3.4 and the elliptic bound (4.9) rely on the isotropic Laplacian in (3.2c), and Remark 3.4 explicitly says the anisotropic case is not treated. The abstract and Theorem 1.1 should therefore be qualified: the result is for the eddy-viscosity model (1.1), or the anisotropic case must be handled.
  2. [Theorem 3.1 (3.4), §6.2] The assumption ∂z g, ∂zz g, ∂zzz g = O(ε) is load-bearing, not a harmless normalization. In the dimensionless physical setting of Section 2.1, ∂z g is O(1) for a standard gravity potential. Section 6.2 shows that for constant ∂z g=N≠0 the linearized vertical acoustic modes satisfy Re λ ∼ |N|/(2ε)>0, so the claimed convergence can fail outside the assumed weak-gravity regime. Thus the phrase 'weakly stratified' in the title and the abstract must be understood as this very specific O(ε) gravity-gradient condition, and the paper should state clearly that the result does not apply to the usual constant-gravity case.
  3. [§4.3, Eqs. (4.31)–(4.32)] The final step from the differential inequality dE_total/dt + ½D_total ≤ H(E_total)(1+D_total^{1/2}) to the uniform bound (4.32) is not justified as written. Since H(E_total) is not uniformly bounded in ε or t, the D_total^{1/2} term cannot simply be absorbed into the left-hand side. A bootstrap or nonlinear Gronwall argument, with a time T depending on E0, is needed to control E_total before absorption. This is likely fixable, but it is a necessary step for the claimed uniform existence interval.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Remark 3.5] The statement that ∂z q(0)=O(ε) 'is not a restriction on the initial data' is misleading. It is a compatibility/uniform-boundedness condition for the vertical acoustic energy; without it the data are singular in the ε→0 limit. The wording should be adjusted.
  2. [§4.2, Proposition 4.4] Several key estimates (e.g., I_1,...,I_8, Eqs. (4.22)–(4.30)) are summarized as 'tedious but straightforward.' For a rigorous journal, at least the nontrivial terms should be displayed with the needed Sobolev embeddings.
  3. [Abstract and text] There are small presentational issues: 'consistent of' should be 'consisting of'; 'H¨older' and 'Cauchy-Schwartz' should be 'Hölder' and 'Cauchy-Schwarz'; and the abstract's phrase 'without any restriction on the size of the initial waves' should be reconciled with the boundedness assumption E0≤M in (3.4).
  4. [Section 5, Lemma 5.2] The proof of L²-orthogonality of Q_va^{ker} and Q_va^{⊥} is compressed. A short display of the integration by parts in z would clarify the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; theorem is proved for the eddy-viscosity system (1.1) rather than the physical anisotropic-viscosity system (2.11), which is a stated scope limitation rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained. The limit system (1.2) is obtained by formal asymptotics in Section 2.3, not assumed; the uniform estimates in Sections 4.2-4.3 are derived directly from the PDEs via the energy identities (3.33), (3.47), and (3.48); and the compactness argument in Proposition 5.3 is based on the equations and the Aubin-Lions lemma. Citations [7,39,40] are used only as benchmarks or for well-posedness of the limit system, and the self-citations [47,48] supply methodology (e.g., the continuity-equation identity (3.3) is re-derived in the text) rather than the target theorem. The one substantive caveat is that the theorem is proved for the eddy-viscosity system (1.1), while the physically nondimensionalized anisotropic-viscosity system (2.11) is explicitly left untreated in Remark 3.4: "For technical reasons, we do not treat the viscosity in system (2.11)." This is a scope mismatch with the abstract's phrasing, but it is not circular because nothing in the proof of Theorem 3.1 or 3.2 presupposes the limit system (1.2). Likewise, the assumption ∂z g=O(epsilon) is a modeling restriction that the paper itself analyzes in Section 6.2, not a concealed input-output equivalence.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted constants. What it does introduce are scaling choices, a weak-stratification restriction on the gravity potential, and a replacement of anisotropic viscosity by eddy viscosity; these are modeling restrictions rather than data-fitted parameters. The projections P_ha, P_va, P_σ and the weight e^{-εg} are mathematical tools, not invented physical entities.

free parameters (2)
  • Equal scaling σ = Ma = Fr = ε
    Eq. (2.9): chosen for presentation; Theorem 3.1 covers this equal-scaling regime only, not general ratios among the parameters.
  • Viscosity scaling Re_hh=1, Re_d=Re_hz=Re_zz=ε^{-2}
    Eq. (2.10) and Remark 2.1: not determined by the physical values in Table 1; chosen so the eddy-viscosity effect remains order one.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Isothermal pressure law p(ρ)=ρ
    Eq. (2.8); excludes isentropic γ>1 flows, which Remark 4.1 states are not handled by the acoustic estimates.
  • domain assumption Reflection symmetry (SYM): ρ, v, g even in z; w odd; domain T^2×2T
    Section 2.3, Eq. (SYM); used to realize the boundary conditions w=∂z v=0 on the periodic cell.
  • ad hoc to paper Weak stratification: ∂z g, ∂zz g, ∂zzz g = O(ε)
    Theorem 3.1 and the introduction; called an 'artificial gravity potential'. Section 6.2 shows that a constant nonzero gravity gradient N produces Re λ ~ |N|/(2ε)>0, so convergence fails without this restriction.
  • ad hoc to paper Eddy viscosity replaces the anisotropic viscosity (Δv, Δw instead of system (2.11))
    Remark 3.4: the original anisotropic viscosity is degenerate in the vertical momentum equation and is explicitly left untreated.
  • domain assumption A priori density bounds 0<ρ/2<ρ<2ρ
    Assumption (3.30); the authors state it is verified for small ε from (3.1) after the energy estimate.
  • domain assumption Initial-data structural scaling: q0∈H^4, v0,w0∈H^3, E0≤M, and ∂z q(0)=O(ε)
    Eqs. (3.4)-(3.5); the authors argue this is not a smallness restriction but it is a structural scaling condition imposed by the wave analysis.
  • standard math Standard Sobolev embedding, Aubin-Lions compactness, Banach-Alaoglu theorem
    Used throughout Sections 4-5 without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rigorous justification of the hydrostatic-incompressible approximation for weakly stratified isothermal flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LWJH3R2B

@misc{pith2026260727477,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rigorous justification of the hydrostatic-incompressible approximation for weakly stratified isothermal flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LWJH3R2B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27477}
}
read the original abstract

We consider the limit of small Mach number and small vertical-to-horizontal aspect ratio for the isothermal compressible Navier-Stokes system. In addition, we consider the scale in which the stratification is weak. Owing to the anisotropic nature of the problem, the dynamics exhibit a three-wave separation phenomenon, consistent of a slow wave, a fast horizontal acoustic wave, and an even faster vertical acoustic wave. These three waves, unfortunately, are not mutually orthogonal, and the corresponding projections are parametrized by the small parameter, which significantly complicates the nonlinear analysis. Without any restriction on the size of the initial waves, we establish the uniform existence and uniqueness of solutions to the compressible Navier-Stokes system for any fixed small parameter, by carefully analyzing the evolutions of both the energy and the acoustic waves. Moreover, we prove that, as the small parameter tends to zero, the solutions converge to that of the incompressible primitive equations governing atmospheric and oceanic flows.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Mathematical justification of the hydrostatic approximation in the primitive equations of geophysical fluid dynamics.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 33(4):847– 859, 2001

    Pascal Az´ erad and Francisco Guill´ en. Mathematical justification of the hydrostatic approximation in the primitive equations of geophysical fluid dynamics.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 33(4):847– 859, 2001

    2001

  2. [2]

    Geostrophic adjustment.Reviews of Geophysics, 10(2):485–528, 1972

    William Blumen. Geostrophic adjustment.Reviews of Geophysics, 10(2):485–528, 1972

    1972

  3. [3]

    Homogeneous hydrostatic flows with convex velocity profiles.Nonlinearity, 12(3):495, 1999

    Yann Brenier. Homogeneous hydrostatic flows with convex velocity profiles.Nonlinearity, 12(3):495, 1999. 26

    1999

  4. [4]

    Remarks on the derivation of the hydrostatic Euler equations.Bulletin des Sciences Mathematiques, 127(7):585–595, 2003

    Yann Brenier. Remarks on the derivation of the hydrostatic Euler equations.Bulletin des Sciences Mathematiques, 127(7):585–595, 2003

    2003

  5. [5]

    The Soundproof Model of an Acoustic–internal Waves System with Low Stratification.Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, 24(4):95, November 2022

    Didier Bresch, Rupert Klein, and Xin Liu. The Soundproof Model of an Acoustic–internal Waves System with Low Stratification.Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, 24(4):95, November 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Finite-time blowup for the inviscid primitive equations of oceanic and atmospheric dynamics.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 337(2):473–482, 2015

    Chongsheng Cao, Slim Ibrahim, Kenji Nakanishi, and Edriss S Titi. Finite-time blowup for the inviscid primitive equations of oceanic and atmospheric dynamics.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 337(2):473–482, 2015

    2015

  7. [7]

    Global well-posedness of the three-dimensional viscous primitive equations of large scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics.Annals of Mathematics, 166(1):245–267, July

    Chongsheng Cao and Edriss Titi. Global well-posedness of the three-dimensional viscous primitive equations of large scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics.Annals of Mathematics, 166(1):245–267, July

  8. [8]

    Three-Scale Singular Limits of Evolutionary PDEs

    Bin Cheng, Qiangchang Ju, and Steve Schochet. Three-Scale Singular Limits of Evolutionary PDEs. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 229(2):601–625, August 2018

    2018

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Stable singularity formation for the inviscid primitive equations.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, 41(2):317–356, 2023

    Charles Collot, Slim Ibrahim, and Quyuan Lin. Stable singularity formation for the inviscid primitive equations.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, 41(2):317–356, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Embid and Andrew J

    Pedro F. Embid and Andrew J. Majda. Averaging over fast gravity waves for geophysical flows with arbitary potential vorticity.Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 21(3-4):619–658, January 1996

    1996

  3. [11]

    Embid and Andrew J

    Pedro F. Embid and Andrew J. Majda. Low Froude number limiting dynamics for stably stratified flow with small or finite Rossby numbers.Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 87(1-2):1–50, March 1998

    1998

  4. [12]

    Existence of a global weak solution to Compressible Primitive Equations.Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 350(7-8):379–382, April 2012

    Mehmet Ersoy and Timack Ngom. Existence of a global weak solution to Compressible Primitive Equations.Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 350(7-8):379–382, April 2012

    2012

  5. [13]

    Compressible primitive equations: Formal derivation and stability of weak solutions.Nonlinearity, 24(1):79–96, 2011

    Mehmet Ersoy, Timack Ngom, and Mamadou Sy. Compressible primitive equations: Formal derivation and stability of weak solutions.Nonlinearity, 24(1):79–96, 2011

    2011

  6. [14]

    Feireisl, Anton ´ ın Novotn´ y, and H

    E. Feireisl, Anton ´ ın Novotn´ y, and H. Petzeltov´ a. On the Existence of Globally Defined Weak Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations.Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, 3(4):358–392, 2001

    2001

  7. [15]

    Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017

    Eduard Feireisl and Anton ´ ın Novotn´ y.Singular Limits in Thermodynamics of Viscous Fluids. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017. Series Title: Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics Publi- cation Title: Springer

    2017

  8. [16]

    Rigorous justification of the hydrostatic approximation for the primitive equations by scaled Navier–Stokes equations.Nonlinearity, 33(12):6502, 2020

    Ken Furukawa, Yoshikazu Giga, Matthias Hieber, Amru Hussein, Takahito Kashiwabara, and Marc Wrona. Rigorous justification of the hydrostatic approximation for the primitive equations by scaled Navier–Stokes equations.Nonlinearity, 33(12):6502, 2020

    2020

  9. [17]

    Gallagher

    I. Gallagher. Applications of Schochet’s methods to parabolic equations.Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 77(10):989–1054, December 1998

    1998

  10. [18]

    On the Hydrostatic Approximation of Compressible Anisotropic Navier–Stokes Equations–Rigorous Justification.Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, 24(3):86, July 2022

    Hongjun Gao, ˇS´ arka Neˇ casov´ a, and Tong Tang. On the Hydrostatic Approximation of Compressible Anisotropic Navier–Stokes Equations–Rigorous Justification.Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, 24(3):86, July 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Adjustment under gravity in a rotating channel.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 77(3):603– 621, 1976

    Adrian E Gill. Adjustment under gravity in a rotating channel.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 77(3):603– 621, 1976

    1976

  12. [20]

    Elsevier, 2016

    Adrian E Gill.Atmosphere-ocean dynamics. Elsevier, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    On the derivation of homogeneous hydrostatic equations.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 33(5):965–970, 1999

    Emmanuel Grenier. On the derivation of homogeneous hydrostatic equations.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 33(5):965–970, 1999. 27

    1999

  14. [22]

    Ill-posedness of the hydrostatic Euler and singular Vlasov equations.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 221(3):1317–1344, 2016

    Daniel Han-Kwan and Toan T Nguyen. Ill-posedness of the hydrostatic Euler and singular Vlasov equations.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 221(3):1317–1344, 2016

    2016

  15. [23]

    Energetics of gravitational adjustment for mesoscale chimneys.Journal of Physical Oceanography, 23(2):346–371, 1993

    AJ Hermann and WB Owens. Energetics of gravitational adjustment for mesoscale chimneys.Journal of Physical Oceanography, 23(2):346–371, 1993

    1993

  16. [24]

    The Lagrangian approach to the compressible primitive equations, February 2025

    Matthias Hieber, Yoshiki Iida, Arnab Roy, and Tarek Z¨ ochling. The Lagrangian approach to the compressible primitive equations, February 2025. arXiv:2502.03630 [math]

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Global strong well-posedness of the three dimensional primitive equations inL p-spaces.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 221(3):1077–1115, 2016

    Matthias Hieber and Takahito Kashiwabara. Global strong well-posedness of the three dimensional primitive equations inL p-spaces.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 221(3):1077–1115, 2016

    2016

  18. [26]

    D. Hoff. Global Solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations for Multidimensional Compressible Flow with Discontinuous Initial Data.Journal of Differential Equations, 120(1):215–254, July 1995

    1995

  19. [27]

    David Hoff. Local Solutions of a Compressible Flow Problem with Navier Boundary Conditions in General Three-Dimensional Domains.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 44(2):633–650, January 2012

    2012

  20. [28]

    An introduction to dynamic meteorology.American Journal of Physics, 41(5):752–754, 1973

    James R Holton. An introduction to dynamic meteorology.American Journal of Physics, 41(5):752–754, 1973

    1973

  21. [29]

    On the profile of singularity formation for the incompressible hydrostatic boussinesq system.Nonlinearity, 39(4):045015, 2026

    Slim Ibrahim, Quyuan Lin, Lingjun Qian, and Edriss S Titi. On the profile of singularity formation for the incompressible hydrostatic boussinesq system.Nonlinearity, 39(4):045015, 2026

    2026

  22. [30]

    Finite-time blowup and ill-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the inviscid primitive equations with rotation.Journal of Differential Equations, 286:557–577, 2021

    Slim Ibrahim, Quyuan Lin, and Edriss S Titi. Finite-time blowup and ill-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the inviscid primitive equations with rotation.Journal of Differential Equations, 286:557–577, 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    On the Cauchy Problems for the System of Fundamental Equations Describing the Movement of Compressible Viscous Fluid.Kodai Math

    Nobutoshi Itaya. On the Cauchy Problems for the System of Fundamental Equations Describing the Movement of Compressible Viscous Fluid.Kodai Math. Sem. Rep., 23:60–120, 1971

    1971

  24. [32]

    Sergiu Klainerman and Andrew Majda. Singular limits of quasilinear hyperbolic systems with large parameters and the incompressible limit of compressible fluids.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 34(4):481–524, July 1981

    1981

  25. [33]

    Compressible and incompressible fluids.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 35(5):629–651, September 1982

    Sergiu Klainerman and Andrew Majda. Compressible and incompressible fluids.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 35(5):629–651, September 1982

    1982

  26. [34]

    Knio, and Piotr K

    Rupert Klein, Ulrich Achatz, Didier Bresch, Omar M. Knio, and Piotr K. Smolarkiewicz. Regime of Validity of Soundproof Atmospheric Flow Models.Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 67(10):3226– 3237, October 2010

    2010

  27. [35]

    Rupert Klein and Andrew J. Majda. Systematic multiscale models for deep convection on mesoscales. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 20(5-6):525–551, 2006

    2006

  28. [36]

    Existence of a solution ‘in the large’ for the 3D large-scale ocean dynamics equations.Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 343(4):283–286, 2006

    Georgij M Kobelkov. Existence of a solution ‘in the large’ for the 3D large-scale ocean dynamics equations.Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 343(4):283–286, 2006

    2006

  29. [37]

    On the regularity of the primitive equations of the ocean.Non- linearity, 20(12):2739, 2007

    Igor Kukavica and Mohammed Ziane. On the regularity of the primitive equations of the ocean.Non- linearity, 20(12):2739, 2007

    2007

  30. [38]

    Time-dependent fully nonlinear geostrophic adjustment.Journal of Physical Oceanography, 27(8):1614–1634, 1997

    Allen C Kuo and Lorenzo M Polvani. Time-dependent fully nonlinear geostrophic adjustment.Journal of Physical Oceanography, 27(8):1614–1634, 1997

    1997

  31. [39]

    Jinkai Li and Edriss S Titi. The primitive equations as the small aspect ratio limit of the Navier–Stokes equations: Rigorous justification of the hydrostatic approximation.Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 124:30–58, 2019

    2019

  32. [40]

    The primitive equations approximation of the anisotropic horizontally viscous 3D Navier–Stokes equations.Journal of Differential Equations, 306:492–524, 2022

    Jinkai Li, Edriss S Titi, and Guozhi Yuan. The primitive equations approximation of the anisotropic horizontally viscous 3D Navier–Stokes equations.Journal of Differential Equations, 306:492–524, 2022. 28

    2022

  33. [41]

    Oxford University Press, January 1996

    Pierre-Louis Lions.Mathematical topics in fluid mechanics. Oxford University Press, January 1996. MAG ID: 1573547614

    1996

  34. [42]

    Volume 2

    Pierre-Louis Lions.Mathematical topics in fluid mechanics. Volume 2. Compressible models. Oxford University Press, 1998. Series Title: Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and Its Applications , Vol 2, No 10 Publication Title: Oxford University Press

    1998

  35. [43]

    Incompressible limit for a viscous compressible fluid.Journal des Mathematiques Pures et Appliquees, 77(6):585–627, 1998

    Pierre-Louis Lions and Nader Masmoudi. Incompressible limit for a viscous compressible fluid.Journal des Mathematiques Pures et Appliquees, 77(6):585–627, 1998

    1998

  36. [44]

    Xin Liu and Edriss S. Titi. Global Existence of Weak Solutions to the Compressible Primitive Equa- tions of Atmospheric Dynamics with Degenerate Viscosities.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 51(3):1913–1964, January 2019

    1913

  37. [45]

    Xin Liu and Edriss S. Titi. Zero Mach Number Limit of the Compressible Primitive Equations: Well- Prepared Initial Data.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 238(2):705–747, November 2020. arXiv: 1905.09367

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Xin Liu and Edriss S. Titi. Local Well-Posedness of Strong Solutions to the Three-Dimensional Com- pressible Primitive Equations.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 241(2):729–764, August 2021

    2021

  39. [47]

    Xin Liu and Edriss S. Titi. Zero Mach number limit of the compressible primitive equations: Ill-prepared initial data.Journal of Differential Equations, 356:1–58, May 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Xin Liu and Edriss S. Titi. Rigorous justification of the hydrostatic approximation limit of viscous compressible flows.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 464:134195, August 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    American Mathe- matical society, 2003

    Andrew Majda.Introduction to PDEs and Waves for the Atmosphere and Ocean. American Mathe- matical society, 2003. Series Title: Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics 9

    2003

  42. [50]

    Majda and Pedro Embid

    Andrew J. Majda and Pedro Embid. Averaging over Fast Gravity Waves for Geophysical Flows with Unbalanced Initial Data.Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 11(3-4):155–169, June 1998

    1998

  43. [51]

    Incompressible, inviscid limit of the compressible Navier–Stokes system.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Analysis, 18(2):199–224, March 2001

    Nader Masmoudi. Incompressible, inviscid limit of the compressible Navier–Stokes system.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Analysis, 18(2):199–224, March 2001

    2001

  44. [52]

    On theH s theory of hydrostatic Euler equations.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 204(1):231–271, 2012

    Nader Masmoudi and Tak Kwong Wong. On theH s theory of hydrostatic Euler equations.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 204(1):231–271, 2012

    2012

  45. [53]

    How deep is the ocean?, April 17 2026

    National Ocean Service. How deep is the ocean?, April 17 2026. Accessed: 2026-04-18

    2026

  46. [54]

    Energy equality for the compressible Primitive Equations with vacuum, December 2024

    ˇS´ arka Neˇ casov´ a, Maria Angeles Rodriguez-Bellido, and Tong Tang. Energy equality for the compressible Primitive Equations with vacuum, December 2024. arXiv:2303.11129 [math]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Lagrangian approach to geostrophic adjustment of frontal anomalies in a stratified fluid.Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 99(2):101–135, 2005

    R Plougonven and V Zeitlin. Lagrangian approach to geostrophic adjustment of frontal anomalies in a stratified fluid.Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 99(2):101–135, 2005

    2005

  48. [56]

    Rajagopal, M

    K.r. Rajagopal, M. Ruzicka, and A.r. Srinivasa. On the oberbeck-boussinesq approximation.Mathe- matical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 06(08):1157–1167, December 1996

    1996

  49. [57]

    Ill-posedness of the hydrostatic Euler and Navier–Stokes equations.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 194(3):877–886, 2009

    Michael Renardy. Ill-posedness of the hydrostatic Euler and Navier–Stokes equations.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 194(3):877–886, 2009

    2009

  50. [58]

    On the mutual adjustment of pressure and velocity distributions in certain simple current systems, II.Journal of Marine Research, 1(3):239–263, 1938

    Carl-Gustav Rossby. On the mutual adjustment of pressure and velocity distributions in certain simple current systems, II.Journal of Marine Research, 1(3):239–263, 1938

    1938

  51. [59]

    The compressible Euler equations in a bounded domain: Existence of solutions and the incompressible limit.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 104(1):49–75, March 1986

    Steve Schochet. The compressible Euler equations in a bounded domain: Existence of solutions and the incompressible limit.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 104(1):49–75, March 1986. 29

    1986

  52. [60]

    Fast Singular Limits of Hyperbolic PDEs.Journal of Differential Equations, 114(2):476– 512, December 1994

    Steve Schochet. Fast Singular Limits of Hyperbolic PDEs.Journal of Differential Equations, 114(2):476– 512, December 1994

    1994

  53. [61]

    Steve Schochet and Xin Xu. Toward uniform existence and convergence theorems for three-scale systems of hyperbolic PDEs with general initial data.Communications in Partial Differential Equations, pages 1–43, October 2022

    2022

  54. [62]

    Singular limits in bounded domains for quasilinear symmetric hyperbolic systems having a vorticity equation.Journal of Differential Equations, 68(3):400–428, July 1987

    Steven Schochet. Singular limits in bounded domains for quasilinear symmetric hyperbolic systems having a vorticity equation.Journal of Differential Equations, 68(3):400–428, July 1987

    1987

  55. [63]

    Moderately Fast Three-Scale Singular Limits.SIAM Journal on Mathe- matical Analysis, 52(4):3444–3462, January 2020

    Steven Schochet and Xin Xu. Moderately Fast Three-Scale Singular Limits.SIAM Journal on Mathe- matical Analysis, 52(4):3444–3462, January 2020

    2020

  56. [64]

    Derivation of the inviscid compressible Primitive Equations.Applied Mathematics Letters, 139:108534, May 2023

    Tong Tang and ˇS´ arka Neˇ casov´ a. Derivation of the inviscid compressible Primitive Equations.Applied Mathematics Letters, 139:108534, May 2023

    2023

  57. [65]

    The incompressible limit and the initial layer of the compressible Euler equation.Journal of Mathematics of Kyoto University, 26(2):323–331, 1986

    Seiji Ukai. The incompressible limit and the initial layer of the compressible Euler equation.Journal of Mathematics of Kyoto University, 26(2):323–331, 1986

    1986

  58. [66]

    Committee on Extension to the Standard Atmosphere

    U.S. Committee on Extension to the Standard Atmosphere. U.s. standard atmosphere, 1976. Technical report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1976

    1976

  59. [67]

    Great lakes, April 18 2026

    Wikipedia contributors. Great lakes, April 18 2026. Accessed: 2026-04-18

    2026

  60. [68]

    Blowup of solutions of the hydrostatic Euler equations.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 143(3):1119–1125, 2015

    Tak Kwong Wong. Blowup of solutions of the hydrostatic Euler equations.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 143(3):1119–1125, 2015. 30

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.