Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Universal topological statistics on triangulated singular spaces

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Random persistence statistics on curved and singular spaces converge to the same universal limit as in Euclidean space.

desk verdict A serious, original extension of persistence-ratio universality to curved and singular triangulable spaces, but Theorem 3.3 as stated is missing an atomlessness condition on the Euclidean limit and an explicit boundedness assumption on the density. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27535 v1 pith:MXNOKHTM submitted 2026-07-30 math.PR math.AT

Uzu Lim , Omer Bobrowski , Primoz Skraba This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath.AT MSC 60D0555N3160G55
keywords persistenthomologyuniversalitytriangulablespacesPoissonpointprocessVietoris–RipsfiltrationČechsingularFreudenthal–Kuhnsubdivision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the statistical behavior of persistent homology on random point clouds is universal across a broad class of spaces. For any compact triangulable space with no cusp singularities—covering smooth manifolds, algebraic varieties, semialgebraic sets, and Whitney stratified spaces—the expected distribution of persistence ratios (death/birth) converges, after rescaling, to a single limit that depends only on the dimension, the filtration, and the homology degree, not on the shape of the space or the sampling density. The known Euclidean universality is transferred to curved and singular spaces by approximating them with recursively subdivided, rectified triangulations while controlling errors near singular strata. If correct, this means the same null distribution used for flat Euclidean data is valid for data sampled near curved or singular objects.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the geometric transfer method. The space M is triangulated, then repeatedly subdivided by the Freudenthal–Kuhn (edgewise) subdivision, which—unlike barycentric subdivision—keeps a positive lower bound on simplex quality. Each subdivision is rectified via its secant map, yielding a piecewise-linear metric on the complex that distorts the intrinsic metric of M by at most a factor of 1 + γ/ℓ (Proposition 3.7). Meanwhile the strata separation angle Θ_φ controls how close points on two different simplices can be: if they are close, both must lie near the skeleton, whose tube volume is only O(r) in the d-dimensional Hausdorff measure (Propositions 3.5 and Lemma 3.6). Tog

What would settle it

Compute or bound the Euclidean limit measure Π*_{k,F,d}: if it has an atom at any α > 1, then Lemma 4.6's error term E(t) fails to vanish at that α, and the transfer argument in Theorem 3.3 does not cover that threshold. Alternatively, simulate Poisson processes with matched intensity on a curved surface (e.g., a 2-sphere) and on a flat rectangle and compare (1/n)Π_{k,F}(nf)([α,∞)) for fixed α: a non-vanishing difference would contradict the claimed universality.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 3.3: for an admissibly triangulable space M—compact, C^2-triangulable, purely d-dimensional, with a positive angle between normal cones of adjacent simplices—and a good density f, the normalized expected persistence-ratio measure satisfies lim_{n→∞} (1/n)Π_{k,F}(nf) = Π*_{k,F,d}, the same universal limit as in Euclidean space, for both Rips and Čech filtrations. A broader theorem (3.4) extends this to any scale-invariant functional satisfying rigidity, homogeneity, continuity, and simplex additivity. The proof divides M into simplices, shows that points lying on two distinct simplices must stay near the singular skeleton, and approximates each curved simplex by a

Load-bearing premise

The proof of the metric-stability step assumes that the already-proven Euclidean universal limit distribution Π*_k has no atom at the threshold α where the comparison is made; the paper states full convergence without proving this continuity, and if Π* jumps there, the transfer from curved to flat simplices fails at that scale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Data sampled from compact smooth manifolds, algebraic varieties, semialgebraic sets, and Whitney stratified spaces can be analyzed with the same universal null distribution for persistence ratios already used in Euclidean topological data analysis.
  • The universality extends to a general class of scale-invariant functionals, so other stabilizing geometric statistics on such spaces will also have space-independent limits.
  • The geometric transfer framework—FK subdivision plus rectification plus singular-strata control—provides explicit metric-distortion bounds, making it a reusable tool for transferring Euclidean stochastic-geometry results to triangulable spaces.
  • Under the (assumed) continuity of the universal limit, small metric perturbations change expected persistence ratios by an amount controlled by the metric distortion and by the mass the universal limit assigns to the intervening interval.
  • The results are stated for Poisson point processes; the paper notes that an analogue for binomial processes is a technical step away.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the universal limit Π* is in fact atom-free, a corollary not spelled out in the paper is that one can build bootstrap or subsampling inference for topological statistics on arbitrary such spaces using a single tabulated null distribution.
  • The transfer idea suggests testable extensions to non-compact or unbounded-curvature settings: whether the admissibility condition (positive strata separation angle) can be relaxed to allow cusp singularities, or whether universality survives at all, is a natural numerical experiment.
  • Since the proof only requires metric stability and simplex additivity, other functionals—such as intrinsic-dimension estimators or stabilization-based geometric statistics—should inherit the same universality; verifying this would generalize the framework.
  • The paper leaves open the regularity of Π*; settling whether the limiting measure is continuous would turn the metric-stability assumption into a theorem and likely sharpen the radius-cutoff conditions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the Euclidean universality theorem for persistence ratios [8] to compact, purely d-dimensional, C^2-triangulable subspaces of R^D with a positive strata-separation angle (admissible triangulable spaces). Theorem 3.3 states that for a good density f on such an M, the expected persistence ratio measure for either the Vietoris–Rips or Čech filtration of a Poisson point process with intensity nf converges, after division by n, to the same universal limit Π*_{k,F,d} that appears in the Euclidean theorem, independently of M and f. Theorem 3.4 states the analogous result for general scale-invariant functionals satisfying conditions (1)–(7), including simplex additivity and metric stability. The proof proceeds by transferring the Euclidean result through a sequence of Freudenthal–Kuhn subdivisions and rectified triangulations, with control on interference across singular strata. The paper also provides detailed geometric estimates, an appendix on FK subdivisions, and a discussion of the necessity of vertex ordering and simplex quality.

Significance. If correct, the result is a substantial extension of a striking universality phenomenon from Euclidean space to manifolds and singular spaces, including semialgebraic and Whitney stratified sets. The geometric transfer framework — FK subdivision, rectification, skeleton interference control — is a useful contribution in its own right and appears to be carefully developed, with explicit constants and a self-contained appendix. The paper is not circular: it relies on the independently established Euclidean universality theorem [8]. However, the proof as written depends on an unstated regularity property of the Euclidean limit measure, and one step in the general-functional proof needs an additional normalization argument; both are local and repairable, but they affect the central claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Lemma 4.6, Eq. (4.11)] The proof of metric stability for the persistence functional assumes that the Euclidean universal limit measure Π*_k is continuous at α. Equation (4.11) defines E(t)=2Π*_k([(1+t)^{-2}α,(1+t)^2α]) and asserts lim_{t↓0}E(t)=0 because Π*_k is continuous at α. The paper neither proves nor cites this atomlessness. If Π*_k({α})>0, then lim E(t)=2Π*_k({α})>0, and no δ>0 can satisfy E(3δ)≤ε/3, which is the condition used in the proof of Theorem 3.4. Since Lemma 4.6 is precisely the verification of condition (7) for the persistence functional, Theorem 3.3 as stated — for every α∈(1,∞) — is not established at atomic thresholds. This is a load-bearing gap. The fix is either to prove the atomlessness of Π*_k (or cite a proof if it is known), or to add it as an explicit hypothesis and restrict Theorem 3.3 to continuity points of Π*_k, adjusting the measure-convergence statement accordingly.
  2. [Proof of Theorem 3.4, Eq. (4.5)] The step labeled "By the universality theorem for the Euclidean space case (Theorem 3.2)" is not a direct application as printed. The density \hat f_σ has total mass |σ|, not 1, so H_n(n\hat f_σ) is an expectation under intensity n|σ| times the probability density g_σ=\hat f_σ/|σ|. To justify (4.5), one must apply Theorem 3.2 to g_σ at control parameter m=n|σ|, obtaining (1/(n|σ|))H_{n|σ|}(n|σ|g_σ)→H*, and then use condition (2) with m=n|σ| and c=1/|σ| to replace H_{n|σ|}(n|σ|g_σ) by H_n(n|σ|g_σ). This gives (1/n)H_n(n\hat f_σ)→|σ|H*, and summing yields (4.5). The authors should spell out this normalization/homogeneity argument; as written, the proof skips a load-bearing step.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2, Theorem 3.3] The good-density condition is defined in the Euclidean setting; for f on a triangulable space M it should be made explicit that the condition is applied to the pullback of f under an admissible triangulation, or defined with respect to the d-dimensional Hausdorff measure on M.
  2. [Lemma 4.3] The proof uses f_max, but the quantity is not defined in the statement of the lemma. It follows from the good-density condition that f is bounded, but this should be stated and f_max should be introduced explicitly.
  3. [Proof of Theorem 3.4, around (4.2)] The bound (1+δ)^2 ≤ 1+3δ uses δ≤1. This assumption is present earlier in the proof, but it would help to restate it immediately before (4.2) to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Appendix C] After Lemma C.2, it would be helpful to state explicitly that the global vertex order chosen in Definition B.8 avoids the incompatibility exhibited in Lemma C.2, since the induced order on a shared face is then the same from both adjacent simplices.
  5. [General] There are a few typographical issues, for example in Lemma 5.2 footnotes 8–10 are informal proof aids; these could be integrated into the proof. The phrase "in [8, 29] it is shown" in the remark after Theorem 3.3 is slightly vague about which claim is established where.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the triangulable-space universality theorem is derived from the independent Euclidean universality theorem [8] via new geometric transfer estimates, not by defining the target limit in terms of itself.

full rationale

The proof chain is self-contained relative to the stated input Theorem 3.1/3.2 from [8]. Theorem 3.3 is a new statement for admissibly triangulable spaces, proved by checking conditions (6) and (7) for the persistence functional and then applying the abstract Euclidean universality theorem simplex-by-simplex after FK subdivision and rectification. The Euclidean theorem is an external published result by two of the same authors, but it is not assumed to prove itself: it is a parameter-free theorem about Euclidean Poisson processes, and the new paper's contribution is the geometric transfer (simplex additivity, metric stability, Proposition 3.7). Lemma 4.6's use of Theorem 3.1 to define E(t) and control metric perturbation is a legitimate application, not a reduction of the target statement to its own input. The one flagged weakness is that Lemma 4.6 is explicitly conditional on continuity of the Euclidean universal limit measure Pi*_k at alpha; Theorem 3.3 states convergence for every alpha without stating or proving that continuity. This is a correctness gap (a missing hypothesis), not a circular step: it does not make the theorem's conclusion equal to its assumptions by construction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to force the choice. Hence no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data-fitted parameters or new physical/mathematical entities are introduced. The constants γ,c1,c2,ℓ0,ℓ,δ are explicit proof artifacts. The main implicit inputs are the admissibility condition, the good-density condition, the radius-cutoff window, and two unstated technical hypotheses on the universal measure and on boundedness of f.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption M admits an admissible C^2 triangulation φ:K→M with positive strata separation angle Θ_φ>0 (3.2).
    Defines the theorem's scope; Proposition 3.5 and the skeleton-interference bounds need Θ_φ>0, excluding cusp singularities.
  • domain assumption f is a good density: compact support plus either positive infimum or two-sided power-law behavior near the support boundary.
    Inherited from the Euclidean universality theorem [8]; used when applying Theorem 3.2 to each flat simplex.
  • domain assumption The radius cutoff satisfies nρ_n^d→∞ and nρ_n^d=o(n^{1/(d^2+d+1)}).
    Needed in Lemma 4.3 to force simplex additivity; the paper calls this technical, but the proof depends on it.
  • ad hoc to paper The Euclidean universal limit measure Π*_{k,F,d} has no atoms at the threshold α.
    Lemma 4.6 defines E(t)=2Π*([(1+t)^{-2}α,(1+t)^2α]) and requires E(t)→0; Theorem 3.3 does not state or prove continuity.
  • ad hoc to paper The density f is globally bounded above.
    Lemma 4.3 uses a finite f_max in the Campbell–Mecke bound, but the good-density definition in §3.1 only imposes compact support and boundary power bounds.
  • standard math Standard background: persistence-module decomposition/stability, Federer area formula, tubular neighbourhood theorem, reach/geodesic controls (Lemma 2.1), and FK/edgewise subdivision quality bounds.
    These results are invoked throughout Sections 4–6 and Appendices B–D and are not re-proved except where stated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal topological statistics on triangulated singular spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MXNOKHTM

@misc{pith2026260727535,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal topological statistics on triangulated singular spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MXNOKHTM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27535}
}
abstract

We prove a universality theorem for random persistent homology over a class of triangulable spaces. More precisely, let $M \subset \mathbb{R}^D$ be a compact $C^2$-triangulable space satisfying a geometric quality condition and let $f: M \to \mathbb{R}$ be a probability density. Then the expected persistence ratio measure computed from the \v{C}ech or Vietoris-Rips complex of a Poisson point process with intensity $nf$ has a universal limit independent of $(M, f)$. Since smooth manifolds, algebraic varieties, semialgebraic sets and Whitney stratified spaces are all triangulable spaces, our theorem applies to a large class of non-Euclidean spaces. Beyond persistent homology, our proof covers a general class of scale-invariant functionals. It relies on a geometric transfer method that adapts constructions in Euclidean space to triangulable spaces through successive approximations by Freudenthal-Kuhn triangulations, and control of interference across singular strata.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [8]

    ,Universality in random persistent homology and scale-invariant functionals, Communications of the AMS 6(2026), 378–423

    2026

  2. [1]

    Selman Akbulut and John D McCarthy,Casson’s invariant for oriented homology 3-spheres, volume 36 of, Math- ematical Notes (1990), 217–231

    1990

  3. [2]

    Randolph E Bank, Andrew H Sherman, and Alan Weiser,Some refinement algorithms and data structures for regular local mesh refinement, Scientific Computing, Applications of Mathematics and Computing to the Physical Sciences1(1983), 3–17

    1983

  4. [3]

    Ulrich Bauer and Michael Lesnick,Induced matchings of barcodes and the algebraic stability of persistence, Pro- ceedings of the thirtieth annual symposium on Computational geometry, 2014, pp. 355–364

    2014

  5. [4]

    8018, 943–949

    Katherine Benjamin, Aneesha Bhandari, Jessica D Kepple, Rui Qi, Zhouchun Shang, Yanan Xing, Yanru An, Nannan Zhang, Yong Hou, Tanya L Crockford, et al.,Multiscale topology classifies cells in subcellular spatial transcriptomics, Nature630(2024), no. 8018, 943–949

    2024

  6. [5]

    Pavel Bleher and Alexander Its,Semiclassical asymptotics of orthogonal polynomials, riemann-hilbert problem, and universality in the matrix model, Annals of Mathematics (1999), 185–266

    1999

  7. [6]

    3, 331–364

    Omer Bobrowski and Matthew Kahle,Topology of random geometric complexes: a survey, Journal of applied and Computational Topology1(2018), no. 3, 331–364

    2018

  8. [7]

    1, 12274

    Omer Bobrowski and Primoz Skraba,A universal null-distribution for topological data analysis, Scientific reports 13(2023), no. 1, 12274

    2023

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    1, 156–191

    Jean-Daniel Boissonnat, Ramsay Dyer, Arijit Ghosh, and Mathijs Wintraecken,Local criteria for triangulating general manifolds, Discrete & Computational Geometry69(2023), no. 1, 156–191

    2023

  2. [10]

    Jean-Daniel Boissonnat, Siargey Kachanovich, and Mathijs Wintraecken,Tracing isomanifolds in rd in time polynomial in d using coxeter-freudenthal-kuhn triangulations, SoCG 2021-37th Symposium on Computational Geometry, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Bradley CA Brown, Anthony L Caterini, Brendan Leigh Ross, Jesse C Cresswell, and Gabriel Loaiza-Ganem, Verifying the union of manifolds hypothesis for image data, The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations

  4. [12]

    8, 549–552

    SS Cairns,Triangulation of the manifold of class one, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society41(1935), no. 8, 549–552

    1935

  5. [13]

    Gunnar Carlsson and Mikael Vejdemo-Johansson,Topological data analysis with applications, Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2021

    2021

  6. [14]

    Frédéric Chazal and Bertrand Michel,An introduction to topological data analysis: fundamental and practical aspects for data scientists, Frontiers in artificial intelligence4(2021), 667963

    2021

  7. [15]

    1, 141–176

    Aruni Choudhary, Siargey Kachanovich, and Mathijs Wintraecken,Coxeter triangulations have good quality, Mathematics in Computer Science14(2020), no. 1, 141–176

    2020

  8. [16]

    3, 230–239

    Ivan Corwin,Kardar-parisi-zhang universality, Notices of the AMS63(2016), no. 3, 230–239

    2016

  9. [17]

    05, 1550066

    William Crawley-Boevey,Decomposition of pointwise finite-dimensional persistence modules, Journal of Algebra and its Applications14(2015), no. 05, 1550066. 32

    2015

  10. [18]

    Xavier Crean, Jeffrey Giansiracusa, and Biagio Lucini,Simplicity of confinement in su(3) yang-mills theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10088 (2026)

    2026

  11. [19]

    Justin Curry and Alberto Speranzon,Stratifying reinforcement learning with signal temporal logic, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.04923 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  12. [20]

    B DELAUNAY,Sur la sphere vide, Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR Classe des Sciences Math- ematiques et Naturelles7(1934), 793–800

    1934

  13. [21]

    3, 249–283

    Vincent Divol and Wolfgang Polonik,On the choice of weight functions for linear representations of persistence diagrams, Journal of Applied and Computational Topology3(2019), no. 3, 249–283

    2019

  14. [22]

    1, 91–138

    Ramsay Dyer, Gert Vegter, and Mathijs Wintraecken,Riemannian simplices and triangulations, Geometriae Dedicata179(2015), no. 1, 91–138

    2015

  15. [23]

    Herbert Edelsbrunner and Daniel R Grayson,Edgewise subdivision of a simplex, Proceedings of the fifteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry, 1999, pp. 24–30

    1999

  16. [24]

    1, 75–119

    László Erdős, Benjamin Schlein, and Horng-Tzer Yau,Universality of random matrices and local relaxation flow, Inventiones mathematicae185(2011), no. 1, 75–119

    2011

  17. [25]

    Herbert Federer,Geometric measure theory, Springer, 2014

    2014

  18. [26]

    3, 580–582

    Hans Freudenthal,Simplizialzerlegungen von beschränkter flachheit, Annals of Mathematics43(1942), no. 3, 580–582

    1942

  19. [27]

    7895, 123–128

    RichardJGardner, ErikHermansen, MariusPachitariu, YoramBurak, NilsABaas, BenjaminADunn, May-Britt Moser, and Edvard I Moser,Toroidal topology of population activity in grid cells, Nature602(2022), no. 7895, 123–128

    2022

  20. [28]

    R Mark Goresky,Triangulation of stratified objects, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (1978), 193–200

    1978

  21. [29]

    5, 2740–2780

    Yasuaki Hiraoka, Tomoyuki Shirai, and Khanh Duy Trinh,Limit theorems for persistence diagrams, The Annals of Applied Probability28(2018), no. 5, 2740–2780

    2018

  22. [30]

    29, Amer- ican Mathematical Society, 1975, pp

    Heisuke Hironaka,Triangulations of algebraic sets, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 29, Amer- ican Mathematical Society, 1975, pp. 165–185

    1975

  23. [31]

    Matthew Kahle,Topology of random simplicial complexes: a survey, arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.7165 (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    RC Kirby and LC Siebenmann,On the triangulation of manifolds and the hauptvermutung, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.75(1969), no. 5, 742–749

    1969

  25. [33]

    2, 492–523

    Johannes Krebs and Wolfgang Polonik,On the asymptotic normality of persistent betti numbers, Advances in Applied Probability57(2025), no. 2, 492–523

    2025

  26. [34]

    thesis, University of Oxford, 2023

    Sung Hyun Lim,Geometric and topological inference from random samples, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    4, 1882–1903

    Uzu Lim, Harald Oberhauser, and Vidit Nanda,Hades: Fast singularity detection with local measure comparison, SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science7(2025), no. 4, 1882–1903

    2025

  28. [36]

    1, 147–176

    Ciprian Manolescu,Pin (2)-equivariant seiberg-witten floer homology and the triangulation conjecture, Journal of the American Mathematical Society29(2016), no. 1, 147–176

    2016

  29. [37]

    James R Munkres,Elementary differential topology, (1961). 33

    1961

  30. [38]

    1, 419–441

    ParthaNiyogi, StephenSmale, andShmuelWeinberger,Finding the homology of submanifolds with high confidence from random samples, Discrete & Computational Geometry39(2008), no. 1, 419–441

    2008

  31. [39]

    Eng-Jon Ong, Omer Bobrowski, Gesine Reinert, and Primoz Skraba,A universal nearest-neighbor estimator for intrinsic dimensionality, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.10493 (2026)

    2026

  32. [40]

    3, 2275–2310

    Takashi Owada and Omer Bobrowski,Convergence of persistence diagrams for topological crackle, Bernoulli26 (2020), no. 3, 2275–2310

    2020

  33. [41]

    elegans embryogenesis at single-cell resolution, Science365(2019), no

    Jonathan S Packer, Qin Zhu, Chau Huynh, Priya Sivaramakrishnan, Elicia Preston, Hannah Dueck, Derek Ste- fanik, Kai Tan, Cole Trapnell, Junhyong Kim, et al.,A lineage-resolved molecular atlas of c. elegans embryogenesis at single-cell resolution, Science365(2019), no. 6459, eaax1971

    2019

  34. [42]

    1, 277–303

    Mathew D Penrose and Joseph E Yukich,Weak laws of large numbers in geometric probability, The Annals of Applied Probability13(2003), no. 1, 277–303

    2003

  35. [43]

    ,Limit theory for point processes in manifolds, The Annals of Applied Probability (2013), 2161–2211

    2013

  36. [44]

    Michael Robinson, Sourya Dey, and Tony Chiang,Token embeddings violate the manifold hypothesis, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems38(2026), 147340–147376

    2026

  37. [45]

    3, 034501

    Nicholas Sale, Biagio Lucini, and Jeffrey Giansiracusa,Probing center vortices and deconfinement in su(2) lattice gauge theory with persistent homology, Physical Review D107(2023), no. 3, 034501

    2023

  38. [46]

    3, 775–839

    Egor Shelukhin,On the hofer-zehnder conjecture, Annals of Mathematics195(2022), no. 3, 775–839

    2022

  39. [47]

    1, 321–373

    ,Viterbo conjecture for zoll symmetric spaces, Inventiones mathematicae230(2022), no. 1, 321–373

    2022

  40. [48]

    Tomoyuki Shirai and Kiyotaka Suzaki,A limit theorem for persistence diagrams of random filtered complexes built over marked point processes, Modern Stochastics: Theory and Applications10(2022), no. 1, 1–18

    2022

  41. [49]

    3, 243–245

    Robin Sibson,Locally equiangular triangulations, The computer journal21(1978), no. 3, 243–245

    1978

  42. [50]

    04, 931–967

    Primoz Skraba and D Yogeshwaran,Central limit theorem for euclidean minimal spanning acycles, Journal of Topology and Analysis17(2025), no. 04, 931–967

    2025

  43. [51]

    33, 19664–19669

    Bernadette J Stolz, Jared Tanner, Heather A Harrington, and Vidit Nanda,Geometric anomaly detection in data, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences117(2020), no. 33, 19664–19669

    2020

  44. [52]

    2, 549–572

    Terence Tao and Van Vu,Random matrices: Universality of local eigenvalue statistics up to the edge, Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics298(2010), no. 2, 549–572

    2010

  45. [53]

    41, e2102166118

    Oliver Vipond, Joshua A Bull, Philip S Macklin, Ulrike Tillmann, Christopher W Pugh, Helen M Byrne, and Heather A Harrington,Multiparameter persistent homology landscapes identify immune cell spatial patterns in tumors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118(2021),...

    2021

  46. [54]

    35175–35197

    Julius Von Rohrscheidt and Bastian Rieck,Topological singularity detection at multiple scales, International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2023, pp. 35175–35197

    2023

  47. [55]

    2018, 501–532

    Larry Wasserman,Topological data analysis, Annual review of statistics and its application5(2018), no. 2018, 501–532

    2018

  48. [56]

    4, 809–824

    John Henry C Whitehead,On c1-complexes, Annals of Mathematics41(1940), no. 4, 809–824

    1940

  49. [57]

    34 AppendixA.Notations We summarize the notations and conventions used in this article

    Yuxing Jared Yao and Iris HR Yoon,Topological decoding of grid cell activity via path lifting to covering spaces, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.16216 (2025). 34 AppendixA.Notations We summarize the notations and conventions used in this article. Symbol Description X,Y Set of point...

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.