Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Hubbard physics with ultracold polar molecules: on-site interaction energies for shielded molecules

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Shielded polar molecules on a lattice can have on-site interaction U that flips from attractive to repulsive as the lattice is tightened, opening Hubbard physics with double occupancy.

desk verdict Solid computation showing shielded molecular pairs give a tunable U that crosses zero inside the Hubbard window—new and usable, with the harmonic-trap caveat already flagged. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.28533 v1 pith:44SBXHJK submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atom-ph

Carlin Stewart-Wiese , Joy Dutta , Jeremy M. Hutson This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-ph
keywords ultracoldpolarmoleculesmicrowaveshieldingHubbardmodelon-siteinteractionopticallatticesdipolarinteractionsdoubleoccupancy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ultracold polar molecules usually cannot share a lattice site because they collide and are lost. Microwave shielding puts a large repulsive core around each pair while leaving long-range dipole forces intact. This paper calculates the on-site interaction energy U for two shielded molecules on the same site and finds that U behaves unlike the familiar atomic case. For both unbound pairs and weakly bound molecular dimers, U can be negative in a weak lattice yet cross zero and become positive as the lattice is strengthened. The bound-state branch lets experimentalists tune the ratio U/t through the window needed for pair superfluids, supersolids and other multi-occupancy phases, without imposing a hard-core constraint that forbids double occupancy.

What carries the argument

Exact separation of relative and centre-of-mass motion inside a harmonic well, solved by coupled-channel bound-state calculations on the two-dimensional microwave-shielding potential that combines a hard repulsive core with anisotropic dipole–dipole tails.

What would settle it

Measure the double-occupancy fraction or pair-tunnelling rate for microwave-shielded NaCs (or an equivalent species) while scanning lattice depth across the predicted zero-crossing of U; the sign change in effective interaction should appear as a clear change in the many-body response.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For microwave-shielded molecules the on-site interaction U is often non-monotonic in trap frequency: it is negative at weak confinement and crosses zero to positive values as the lattice is tightened. This zero-crossing occurs for both continuum pairs and two-body bound states; the bound states place the crossing inside the experimentally accessible range of lattice depths, so that U/t can be swept continuously from roughly −10 to +50.

Load-bearing premise

The real optical lattice is replaced by a single isotropic harmonic well, ignoring anharmonicity and leakage of the wave-function into neighbouring sites.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bound two-molecule states become a practical knob for dialling U across the full range needed for multi-occupancy Hubbard models.
  • Hard-core constraints that previously excluded double occupancy can be lifted while still retaining strong long-range dipolar interactions.
  • Pair superfluidity, supersolid order and occupation-dependent tunnelling become experimentally accessible with polar molecules.
  • The same qualitative U(ω) behaviour is expected for other shielding schemes (static electric, dual-microwave, elliptical) once their effective potentials are inserted.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the zero-crossing is controlled by the competition between the repulsive core and the trap, modest changes in microwave Rabi frequency or detuning should move the crossing without rebuilding the lattice.
  • The strong angular correlations induced by the dipole tail mean that lattice geometry (cubic versus anisotropic) will reshape the effective U even more than for magnetic atoms.
  • Once double occupancy is allowed, occupation-dependent tunnelling terms already present in molecular Hubbard models will become quantitatively important and should be re-evaluated with the correlated two-body wave-functions computed here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes on-site interaction energies U for pairs of microwave-shielded ultracold polar molecules on the same optical-lattice site. Using published 2D effective potentials (long-range dipole–dipole plus a large repulsive core) and numerically exact coupled-channel solutions of the relative-motion Schrödinger equation in an isotropic harmonic well, the authors show that U(ω) is strongly non-monotonic. Both unbound pairs and weakly bound two-body states can have U < 0 at weak confinement and cross zero to U > 0 as the trap frequency increases. For the bound branch they argue that U/t can be tuned through the experimentally relevant window ≈ −10 to +50 by lattice depth alone, without imposing a hard-core constraint, thereby opening previously inaccessible regimes of strongly dipolar Hubbard physics with multiple site occupancy.

Significance. If the reported tunability of U holds under realistic lattice conditions, the work supplies a concrete, experimentally actionable route to multi-occupancy dipolar Hubbard models with molecules—regimes that have been largely excluded by collisional loss or by hard-core constraints. The calculations rest on established effective potentials and on standard, machine-validated coupled-channel machinery (BOUND/MOLSCAT), with scattering lengths computed independently for comparison. The qualitative contrast with the atomic contact formula (Eq. 1) is clear and physically well motivated by the excluded volume of the shielding core. This is a timely and useful contribution for the growing community working on molecular quantum gases in lattices.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods, Eqs. 2–3; Fig. 2] Methods (Eqs. 2–3) and Fig. 2: The quantitative claim that bound-state U/t can be tuned through ≈ −10…+50 (Fig. 2, Ω = 3.5 MHz, zero-crossing near V0/Er ≈ 13, ω ≈ 8 kHz) rests entirely on the single isotropic harmonic well. The manuscript asserts this is “reasonably accurate for V0 ≳ 5 Er” but gives no error estimate on U or on the location of the zero-crossing once lattice anharmonicity and Wannier leakage are restored. For the weakly bound branch (binding energies of a few kHz) the free-space pair size can become comparable to the lattice constant (λ/2 ≈ 532 nm). The authors should estimate the rms pair size at the reported crossing and either (i) show that the relative wave function remains well localized inside one cell or (ii) qualify the mapped U/t window and note the possible appearance of pair-hopping/extended terms. Qualitative non-monotonicity of U(ω) is robust; the load-bearin
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1] Fig. 1: The dotted curves from Eq. 1 are helpful but are shown only for the two smallest |a|. Adding a brief statement in the caption that the contact formula fails even qualitatively for large |a| would prevent misreading.
  2. [Results] Universality paragraph (Results): The statement that E_rel and U are universal when scaled by E3 is useful; it would help the reader if the corresponding scaled values of ω at the zero-crossings were quoted once in the text or a table.
  3. [Introduction; Conclusions] Introduction / Conclusions: A short forward reference to static-field or dual-microwave shielding (already cited) would clarify that the qualitative conclusions are expected to carry over, as asserted in the final paragraph.
  4. [Methods; Results heading] Typographical: “Schr¨ odinger” appears with a stray space; “RESUL TS” in the section heading has an embedded space.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: U is obtained by direct numerical solution of the two-body Schrödinger equation, not forced by fit or self-definition.

full rationale

The paper’s central results are numerical values of the on-site energy U(ω) for microwave-shielded molecular pairs. U is defined as E_rel − (3/2)ℏω and E_rel is obtained by solving the coupled-channel relative-motion Schrödinger equation in an isotropic harmonic trap with previously published 2d effective potentials. Scattering lengths are computed independently (MOLSCAT) and used only for comparison with the atomic contact formula; they are not fitted inputs that force U. Self-citations point to methodological tools (BOUND/MOLSCAT packages, effective-potential constructions, universality scaling) that supply the interaction or the solver, not the target observable. The harmonic-well approximation is stated as an uncontrolled approximation for V0 ≳ 5 Er, not as a uniqueness theorem or a fitted ansatz that defines the zero-crossing. There is therefore no step in which a claimed prediction reduces by construction to its inputs. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard two-body quantum mechanics plus three domain modeling choices: (1) published 2-D microwave-shielding effective potentials, (2) exact separability inside an isotropic harmonic trap, and (3) neglect of lattice anharmonicity above V0≈5Er. No free parameters are fitted to the U data; Ω and Δ are experimental control knobs. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Two equally trapped particles in a harmonic well have exactly separable relative and center-of-mass motion.
    Invoked in Methods to reduce the problem to a single relative-motion Schrödinger equation; standard textbook result.
  • domain assumption The 2-D effective potentials of Deng et al. (2023) faithfully represent microwave-shielded NaCs interactions for the purpose of computing E_rel.
    Entire calculation uses V(R,θ) from ref. [36]; accuracy of U inherits any limitations of that effective-potential construction.
  • domain assumption Replacing the optical lattice by a single isotropic harmonic well is reasonably accurate for V0 ≳ 5 Er.
    Stated explicitly in Methods; underpins the identification of computed E_rel − (3/2)ħω with the Hubbard U.
  • domain assumption Energies and frequencies scale universally with the molecule-dependent unit E3 = ħ²/(2μ_red R3²).
    Used to claim results transfer to other polar molecules; taken from the authors’ prior universality paper [37].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hubbard physics with ultracold polar molecules: on-site interaction energies for shielded molecules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/44SBXHJK

@misc{pith2026260728533,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hubbard physics with ultracold polar molecules: on-site interaction energies for shielded molecules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/44SBXHJK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28533}
}
abstract

We explore on-site interaction energies $U$ for pairs of shielded ultracold molecules on the same lattice site. We use 2-dimensional effective potentials appropriate for microwave shielding, which have dipole-dipole character at long range but feature a very large repulsive core when the two molecules come close together. This causes very strong correlation between the motions of two molecules on the same site. We find behavior very different from that for ultracold atoms: in particular, there are states for which $U$ is negative for weak lattices but crosses zero to positive values as the lattice strength increases. This behavior is found for both unbound pairs and 2-body bound states. The latter will give access to previously unexplored types of strongly dipolar Hubbard physics with multiple site occupancy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28533 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows the results of coupled-channel calcu￾lations at several values of Ω, chosen to span the range between moderate positive and large negative scattering lengths. For each value of Ω, there are two curves: the lower curve is for a two-molecule state that is bound even at ω = 0, while the upper curve is for a state that is un￾bound at ω = 0; we refer to these below as the bound and unbound states. We first consider… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ultracold molecules

    S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, and K. R. A. Hazzard. “Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ultracold molecules.” Nat. Phys.,20, 730 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Cold molecules: Progress in quantum engineering of chemistry and quan- tum matter

    J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye. “Cold molecules: Progress in quantum engineering of chemistry and quan- tum matter.” Science,357, 1002 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    From few- to many-body physics: Strongly dipolar molecular Bose-Einstein con- densates and quantum fluids

    A. Schindewolf, J. Hertkorn, I. Stevenson, M. Ciardi, P. Gross, D. Wang, T. Karman, G. Qu´ em´ ener, S. Will, T. Pohl, and T. Langen. “From few- to many-body physics: Strongly dipolar molecular Bose-Einstein con- densates and quantum fluids.” arXiv:2512.14511 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Quan- tum magnetism with ultracold molecules

    M. L. Wall, K. R. A. Hazzard, and A. M. Rey. “Quan- tum magnetism with ultracold molecules.” In S. A. Ma- linovskaya and I. Novikova (Editors), “From Atomic to Mesoscale,” (World Scientific, Singapore, 2015), chap- ter 1, 3–37

    2015

  5. [5]

    Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules

    D. DeMille, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Rey, and T. Zelevin- sky. “Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules.” Nature Physics,20, 741 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Ultracold chemistry as a testbed for few-body physics

    T. Karman, M. Tomza, and J. P´ erez-R ´ ıoz. “Ultracold chemistry as a testbed for few-body physics.” Nature Physics,20, 722 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Evaporation of microwave-shielded polar molecules to quantum degen- eracy

    A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, T. Karman, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo. “Evaporation of microwave-shielded polar molecules to quantum degen- eracy.” Nature,607, 677 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Observation of Bose-Einstein 5 condensation of dipolar molecules

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will. “Observation of Bose-Einstein 5 condensation of dipolar molecules.” Nature,631, 289 (2024)

    2024

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Bose-Einstein condensate of ultracold sodium-rubidium molecules with tunable dipolar inter- actions

    Z. Shi, Z. Huang, F. Deng, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, T. Shi, and D. Wang. “Bose-Einstein condensate of ultracold sodium-rubidium molecules with tunable dipolar inter- actions.” arXiv:2508.20518 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    A toolbox for lattice-spin models with polar molecules

    A. Micheli, G. K. Brennen, and P. Zoller. “A toolbox for lattice-spin models with polar molecules.” Nat. Phys.,2, 341 (2006)

    2006

  3. [11]

    Observation of dipolar spin-exchange interactions with lattice-confined polar molecules

    B. Yan, S. A. Moses, B. Gadway, J. P. Covey, K. R. A. Hazzard, A. M. Rey, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye. “Observation of dipolar spin-exchange interactions with lattice-confined polar molecules.” Nature,501, 521 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    Simulating quantum magnets with symmetric top molecules

    M. L. Wall, K. Maeda, and L. D. Carr. “Simulating quantum magnets with symmetric top molecules.” Ann. Phys.,525, 845 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    Creation of a low- entropy quantum gas of polar molecules in an optical lattice

    S. A. Moses, J. P. Covey, M. T. Miecnikowski, B. Yan, B. Gadway, J. Ye, and D. S. Jin. “Creation of a low- entropy quantum gas of polar molecules in an optical lattice.” Science,350, 659 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Realizing un- conventional quantum magnetism with symmetric top molecules

    M. L. Wall, K. Maeda, and L. D. Carr. “Realizing un- conventional quantum magnetism with symmetric top molecules.” New J. Phys.,17, 025001 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Prob- ing site-resolved correlations in a spin system of ultracold molecules

    L. Christakis, J. S. Rosenberg, R. Raj, S. Chi, A. Morn- ingstar, D. A. Huse, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr. “Prob- ing site-resolved correlations in a spin system of ultracold molecules.” Nature Comm.,614, 64 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Multi-state detection and spatial addressing in a microscope for ultracold molecules

    J. M. Mortlock, A. P. Raghuram, B. P. Maddox, P. D. Gregory, and S. L. Cornish. “Multi-state detection and spatial addressing in a microscope for ultracold molecules.” Nature Comm.,17, 518 (2026)

    2026

  9. [17]

    Quan- tum magnetism with multicomponent dipolar molecules in an optical lattice

    R. Barnett, D. Petrov, M. Lukin, and E. Demler. “Quan- tum magnetism with multicomponent dipolar molecules in an optical lattice.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,96, 190401 (2006)

    2006

  10. [18]

    Hyperfine molecular Hub- bard hamiltonian

    M. L. Wall and L. D. Carr. “Hyperfine molecular Hub- bard hamiltonian.” Phys. Rev. A,82, 013611 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    Quantum magnetism with polar alkali-metal dimers

    A. V. Gorshkov, S. R. Manmana, G. Chen, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and A. M. Rey. “Quantum magnetism with polar alkali-metal dimers.” Phys. Rev. A,84, 033619 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    Prediction of a gapless topological Haldane liquid phase in a one-dimensional cold polar molecular lattice

    J. P. Kestner, B. Wang, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma. “Prediction of a gapless topological Haldane liquid phase in a one-dimensional cold polar molecular lattice.” Phys. Rev. B,83, 174409 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    Molecu- lar Hubbard Hamiltonian: Field regimes and molecular species

    M. L. Wall, E. Bekaroglu, and L. D. Carr. “Molecu- lar Hubbard Hamiltonian: Field regimes and molecular species.” Phys. Rev. A,88, 023605 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    Ultracold nonreactive molecules in an optical lattice: Connecting chemistry to many-body physics

    A. Do¸ caj, M. L. Wall, R. Mukherjee, and K. R. A. Haz- zard. “Ultracold nonreactive molecules in an optical lattice: Connecting chemistry to many-body physics.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,116, 135301 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Microscopic derivation of multi-channel Hubbard models for ultracold nonreactive molecules in an optical lattice

    M. L. Wall, N. P. Mehta, R. Mukherjee, S. S. Alam, and K. R. A. Hazzard. “Microscopic derivation of multi-channel Hubbard models for ultracold nonreactive molecules in an optical lattice.” Phys. Rev. A,95, 043635 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Observation of generalized t-Jspin dynamics with tunable dipolar interactions

    A. N. Carroll, H. Hirzler, C. Miller, D. Wellnitz, S. R. Muleady, J. Lin, K. P. Zamarski, R. R. W. Wang, J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye. “Observation of generalized t-Jspin dynamics with tunable dipolar interactions.” Sci- ence,388, 381 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Non-standard Hubbard models in optical lat- tices: a review

    O. Dutta, M. Gajda, P. Hauke, M. Lewenstein, D.- S. L¨ uhmann, B. A. Malomed, T. Sowi´ nski, and J. Za- krzewski. “Non-standard Hubbard models in optical lat- tices: a review.” Rep. Prog. Phys.,78, 066001 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Suppres- sion of inelastic collisions of polar 1Σ state molecules in an electrostatic field

    A. V. Avdeenkov, M. Kajita, and J. L. Bohn. “Suppres- sion of inelastic collisions of polar 1Σ state molecules in an electrostatic field.” Phys. Rev. A,73, 022707 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    Tuning ultracold collisions of excited rotational dipolar molecules

    G. Wang and G. Qu´ em´ ener. “Tuning ultracold collisions of excited rotational dipolar molecules.” New J. Phys., 17, 035015 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Adimensional theory of shielding in ultracold collisions of dipolar rotors

    M. L. Gonz´ alez-Mart ´ ınez, J. L. Bohn, and G. Qu´ em´ ener. “Adimensional theory of shielding in ultracold collisions of dipolar rotors.” Phys. Rev. A,96, 032718 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Shielding collisions of ultracold CaF molecules with static electric fields

    B. Mukherjee, M. D. Frye, C. R. Le Sueur, M. R. Tarbutt, and J. M. Hutson. “Shielding collisions of ultracold CaF molecules with static electric fields.” Phys. Rev. Res.,5, 033097 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Controlling collisional loss and scattering lengths of ultracold dipolar molecules with static electric fields

    B. Mukherjee and J. M. Hutson. “Controlling collisional loss and scattering lengths of ultracold dipolar molecules with static electric fields.” Phys. Rev. Res.,6, 013145 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules

    T. Karman and J. M. Hutson. “Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,121, 163401 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Controlling the scat- tering length of ultracold dipolar molecules

    L. Lassabli` ere and G. Qu´ em´ ener. “Controlling the scat- tering length of ultracold dipolar molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,121, 163402 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules with imperfectly circular polar- ization

    T. Karman and J. M. Hutson. “Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules with imperfectly circular polar- ization.” Phys. Rev. A,100, 052704 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Microwave shielding with far-from-circular polarization

    T. Karman. “Microwave shielding with far-from-circular polarization.” Phys. Rev. A,101, 042702 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Resonant and first-order dipolar interactions between ultracold 1Σ molecules in static and microwave electric fields

    T. Karman, Z. Z. Yan, and M. Zwierlein. “Resonant and first-order dipolar interactions between ultracold 1Σ molecules in static and microwave electric fields.” Phys. Rev. A,105, 013321 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Effective potential and superfluidity of microwave-shielded polar molecules

    F. Deng, X.-Y. Chen, X.-Y. Luo, W. Zhang, S. Yi, and T. Shi. “Effective potential and superfluidity of microwave-shielded polar molecules.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 130, 183001 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Universality in the microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules

    J. Dutta, B. Mukherjee, and J. M. Hutson. “Universality in the microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules.” Phys. Rev. Res,7, 023164 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Double microwave shielding

    T. Karman, N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Steven- son, and S. Will. “Double microwave shielding.” PRX Quantum,6, 020358 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Scattering of ultracold molecules in the highly resonant regime

    M. Mayle, G. Qu´ em´ ener, B. P. Ruzic, and J. L. Bohn. “Scattering of ultracold molecules in the highly resonant regime.” Phys. Rev. A,87, 012709 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    Two- and many-body physics of ultracold molecules dressed by dual microwave fields

    F. Deng, X. Hu, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, and T. Shi. “Two- and many-body physics of ultracold molecules dressed by dual microwave fields.” Nat. Commun.,16, 11219 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Effective anisotropic interaction potentials for pairs of ultracold molecules shielded by a static electric field

    B. Mukherjee, L. Santos, and J. M. Hutson. “Effective anisotropic interaction potentials for pairs of ultracold molecules shielded by a static electric field.” New J. Phys.,27, 093204 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices

    D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller. “Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,81, 3108 (1998)

    1998

  35. [43]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin.Solid State Physics (Brooks Cole, 1976)

    1976

  36. [44]

    Quantum-mechanical many- body problem with hard-sphere interaction

    K. Huang and C. N. Yang. “Quantum-mechanical many- body problem with hard-sphere interaction.” Phys. Rev., 105, 767 (1957)

    1957

  37. [45]

    Trapped atomic condensates with anisotropic interactions

    S. Yi and L. You. “Trapped atomic condensates with anisotropic interactions.” Phys. Rev. A,61, 041604(R) 6 (2000)

    2000

  38. [46]

    Trapped atomic condensates with dipole interactions

    S. Yi and L. You. “Trapped atomic condensates with dipole interactions.” Phys. Rev. A,63, 053607 (2001)

    2001

  39. [47]

    Quantum phases of dipolar bosons in optical lattices

    K. G´ oral, L. Santos, and M. Lewenstein. “Quantum phases of dipolar bosons in optical lattices.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,88, 170406 (2002)

    2002

  40. [48]

    Dipolar molecules in optical lattices

    T. Sowi´ nski, O. Dutta, P. Hauke, L. Tagliacozzo, and M. Lewenstein. “Dipolar molecules in optical lattices.” Phys. Rev. Lett.,108, 115301 (2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    Dipolar interaction in ultra-cold atomic gases

    C. Menotti, M. Lewenstein, T. Lahaye, and T. Pfau. “Dipolar interaction in ultra-cold atomic gases.” AIP Conf. Proc.,970, 332 (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    Dipolar physics: a re- view of experiments with magnetic quantum gases

    L. Chomaz, I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe- Tolra, B. L. Lev, and T. Pfau. “Dipolar physics: a re- view of experiments with magnetic quantum gases.” Rep. Prog. Phys.,86, 026401 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Heteronuclear molecules in an optical lat- tice: Theory and experiment

    F. Deuretzbacher, K. Plassmeier, D. Pfannkuche, F. Werner, C. Ospelkaus, S. Ospelkaus, K. Sengstock, and K. Bongs. “Heteronuclear molecules in an optical lat- tice: Theory and experiment.” Phys. Rev. A,77, 032726 (2008)

    2008

  44. [52]

    Quasi- universal dipolar scattering in cold and ultracold gases

    J. L. Bohn, M. Cavagnero, and C. Ticknor. “Quasi- universal dipolar scattering in cold and ultracold gases.” New J. Phys.,11, 055039 (2009)

    2009

  45. [53]

    Near-threshold bound states of the dipole-dipole interaction

    T. Karman, M. D. Frye, J. D. Reddel, and J. M. Hut- son. “Near-threshold bound states of the dipole-dipole interaction.” Phys. Rev. A,98, 062502 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    boundandfield: programs for calculating bound states of interacting pairs of atoms and molecules

    J. M. Hutson and C. R. Le Sueur. “boundandfield: programs for calculating bound states of interacting pairs of atoms and molecules.” Comp. Phys. Comm.,241, 1 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    molscat,boundand field, version 2025.0

    J. M. Hutson and C. R. Le Sueur. “molscat,boundand field, version 2025.0.”https://github.com/molscat/ molscat(2025)

    2025

  48. [56]

    Feshbach resonances in ultracold atomic and molecular collisions: threshold behaviour and sup- pression of poles in scattering lengths

    J. M. Hutson. “Feshbach resonances in ultracold atomic and molecular collisions: threshold behaviour and sup- pression of poles in scattering lengths.” New J. Phys.,9, 152 (2007)

    2007

  49. [57]

    molscat: a pro- gram for non-reactive quantum scattering calculations on atomic and molecular collisions

    J. M. Hutson and C. R. Le Sueur. “molscat: a pro- gram for non-reactive quantum scattering calculations on atomic and molecular collisions.” Comp. Phys. Comm., 241, 9 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Wannier states and Bose- Hubbard parameters for 2D optical lattices

    P. B. Blakie and C. W. Clark. “Wannier states and Bose- Hubbard parameters for 2D optical lattices.” J. Phys. B, 372, 1391 (2004)

    2004

  51. [59]

    Superfluid and insulating phases in an interacting-boson model: Mean-field theory and the RPA

    K. Sheshadri, H. R. Krishnamurthy, R. Pandit, and T. V. Ramakrishnan. “Superfluid and insulating phases in an interacting-boson model: Mean-field theory and the RPA.” Europhys. Lett.,22, 257 (1993)

    1993

  52. [60]

    Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch. “Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms.” Nature, 415, 39 (2002)

    2002

  53. [61]

    Phases of the one- dimensional Bose-Hubbard model

    T. D. K¨ uhner and H. Monien. “Phases of the one- dimensional Bose-Hubbard model.” Phys. Rev. B,58, R14741 (1998)

    1998

  54. [62]

    Bose-Hubbard model with attractive interactions

    M. W. Jack and M. Yamashita. “Bose-Hubbard model with attractive interactions.” Phys. Rev. A,71, 023610 (2005)

    2005

  55. [63]

    Feshbach resonances, weakly bound molecular states and coupled-channel potentials for cesium at high magnetic field

    M. Berninger, A. Zenesini, B. Huang, W. Harm, H.-C. N¨ agerl, F. Ferlaino, R. Grimm, P. S. Julienne, and J. M. Hutson. “Feshbach resonances, weakly bound molecular states and coupled-channel potentials for cesium at high magnetic field.” Phys. Rev. A,87, 032517 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.