Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 241 references

Electro-Optic Active Metasurfaces for High-Speed Photonic Applications

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Electro-optic metasurfaces are transitioning from physics demonstrations to engineered devices, with resonant structures amplifying tiny refractive-index changes and fabrication now the binding constraint.

desk verdict Useful, wide-ranging review of EO metasurfaces, but the central quantitative comparison (Table 3/Section 4.1) is not trustworthy as written because the metrics are incomparable, and several internal errors need cleanup. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.00606 v1 pith:JH3ITHT5 submitted 2026-08-01 physics.optics

Mingwei Tang , Ruochong Chen , Yue Cao , Chao Meng , Fei Ding , Yadong Deng , Yubing Han , Kai Wei
show 1 more author
Sergey I. Bozhevolnyi
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.79.Hp78.20.Jq42.25.Bs
keywords activemetasurfaceselectro-opticeffectPockelslithiumniobatebariumtitanateorganicEOpolymersquasi-boundstatesinthecontinuumhigh-speedphotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that electro-optic metasurfaces—ultrathin nanostructured surfaces whose optical response is changed by an applied electric field—are reaching the point where they can move from laboratory demonstrations to real photonic devices. Because EO materials change refractive index by only about one part in a thousand to ten thousand, and metasurfaces are only a wavelength or so thick, useful modulation requires resonant structures (Mie modes, plasmonic resonances, Fabry–Pérot cavities, guided-mode resonances, quasi-bound states in the continuum, surface lattice resonances) to stretch the effective interaction length. The review maps how four material platforms—lithium niobate, barium titanate, PZT, and organic EO polymers—trade off EO strength, speed, loss, and manufacturability against these six resonance mechanisms. Its central conclusion is that no single material or resonance mechanism will win; the next generation will come from co-optimizing the EO material, the resonance–electrode design, and the heterogeneous integration process, with fabrication and integration currently the binding constraint.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the resonance-Q / bandwidth trade-off, quantified by 1/f_EO^2 = 1/f_RC^2 + 1/f_tau^2 with f_tau = c/(Q lambda). This identity says that the same high-Q resonance that amplifies the EO effect (via the Purcell factor and the steep spectral slope dT/dlambda) also sets an upper bound on modulation speed. The review uses this trade-off as the axis along which all six resonance mechanisms and four material platforms are compared, and as the reason the field's bottleneck is fabrication: electrode loss and interface roughness currently cap active Q near 8000.

What would settle it

Take the highest-performing device from each row of Table 3, for example the LN qBIC/GMR modulator with Q about 8000 and the OEO plasmonic modulator with 1.25 GHz bandwidth, remeasure both under identical conditions, and check whether the stated modulation efficiency per volt and Q values reproduce. Alternatively, build an EO metasurface that reaches Q above 10^4 using a new material alone, with no resonance–electrode co-design, and measure a pi phase shift below 1 V at above 1 GHz; if that works, the review's central claim that co-optimization is required would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that active EO metasurfaces have moved from a physics demonstration ('per-pixel EO modulation is physically possible') to an engineering problem: building devices that simultaneously meet the speed, voltage, loss, and aperture requirements of real systems. The evidence is organized as a two-dimensional design space: four EO material platforms (LN, BTO, PZT, OEO polymers) crossed with six resonance-engineering mechanisms (Mie resonances, surface plasmon polaritons, Fabry–Pérot cavities, guided-mode resonances, quasi-bound states in the continuum, surface lattice resonances, plus hybrid combinations). Within this space, the review identifies a fundamental trade-off

Load-bearing premise

The review's comparative ranking of materials and mechanisms assumes that the performance figures collected from different published devices were measured accurately and under comparable conditions; the text itself contains at least two inconsistencies—the 0.21 V·cm value is credited to different references in Table 2 and Section 2.2, and BTO's r33 is quoted as both above 900 pm/V and about 105 pm/V in different sections—so if these metrics are wrong or not comparable, the ra

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If active EO metasurfaces can reach Q above 10^4, sub-volt pi phase shifts at individual pixels become plausible, enabling dynamic wavefront control in LiDAR and free-space optical links.
  • Different applications should choose different mechanisms: high-Q qBIC/GMR/SLR designs for narrowband, low-voltage modulation; low-Q plasmonic or hybrid designs for GHz-class amplitude modulation.
  • Heterogeneous integration—bonding, micro-transfer printing, and etchless patterning—is the decisive engineering enabler; wafer-scale integration has been shown for waveguides but not yet for EO metasurfaces.
  • Commercially viable EO metasurfaces are projected within about a decade, driven by co-optimization plus AI-assisted inverse design and wafer-scale DUV or nanoimprint fabrication.
  • The Q-bandwidth ceiling means that devices targeting both high modulation depth and GHz speed must be designed at a moderate Q sweet spot, not at the highest achievable resonance sharpness.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review's own numbers suggest the 0.21 V·cm record is contested (Table 2 and Section 2.2 credit different references), so a standardized benchmarking of EO metasurfaces would sharpen the design map more than any new material demonstration alone.
  • The Q-bandwidth trade-off implies a sweet spot around Q ~ 10^3–10^4 for GHz modulation; mechanisms that decouple Q enhancement from fabrication precision, such as qBIC–Fabry–Pérot Fano coupling, are worth prioritizing.
  • EO metasurfaces may enter commercial products first in LiDAR beam steering and free-space interconnects, where apertures are small and per-pixel speed requirements are modest, before general-purpose spatial light modulators.
  • A testable extension would be to co-optimize electrode shape and resonance geometry computationally, treating the Q–bandwidth relation as an explicit constraint, rather than optimizing optical Q alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of electro-optic (EO) active metasurfaces for high-speed photonic applications. It surveys the main EO material platforms—lithium niobate, barium titanate, PZT, and organic EO polymers—and the physical mechanisms (Pockels and Kerr effects) used for modulation. It organizes the field into resonant enhancement strategies: Mie resonances, surface plasmon polaritons, Fabry–Pérot cavities, guided-mode resonances, quasi-bound states in the continuum, surface lattice resonances, and hybrid combinations. The review compiles reported device metrics in Tables 1–3, compares mechanisms qualitatively in Section 4.1, discusses applications in Section 4.2, and argues in Sections 5 and 6 that the principal bottleneck is fabrication and heterogeneous integration rather than any single physical mechanism. The central claim is that the field is moving from proof-of-concept per-pixel EO modulation toward co-optimized materials, resonance–electrode architectures, and scalable integration.

Significance. If the compiled comparisons were reliable, this review would fill a useful niche: it provides a systematic taxonomy of EO metasurface mechanisms, a broad reference list spanning materials and device demonstrations, and a clear articulation of the trade-offs between Q-factor, speed, modulation depth, and insertion loss. The discussion of fabrication constraints—especially etchless LN, BTO poling, PZT domain effects, and OEO thermal stability—is informed and valuable. The review also explicitly identifies the photon-lifetime/RC bandwidth ceiling (Eqs. 11–12), which is a helpful conceptual anchor. However, the quantitative foundation is currently fragile: the central comparative tables contain inconsistent metrics and internal contradictions, so the ranked conclusions in Section 4.1 and the bottleneck claim in Section 5.5 do not yet follow from the evidence as presented. With corrected tables and clarified definitions, the review could become a reliable reference; in its present form it requires revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Table 3 and Section 4.1] The 'Modulation efficiency' column is the quantitative backbone of the Section 4.1 rankings and of the Section 5.5 statement that 'the highest Q experimentally achieved in an EO-active metasurface remains ~8000.' The entries do not implement a common metric: '0.001 nm/V' is a spectral tuning rate, '0.015 V-1' and '0.25 V-1' are not defined as amplitude or phase response, and the operating point on the resonance slope, DC vs AC drive, and insertion loss are not specified. These rows are therefore not commensurable, and the ranked trade-off conclusions do not follow. Please define one normalized efficiency, add loss/bandwidth/Q columns with clear conditions, or soften the rankings to qualitative.
  2. [Section 2.2, Table 2, Section 3.1] The 0.21 V·cm record is attributed inconsistently. Section 2.2 credits a slow-light Mach–Zehnder modulator [38]; Table 2 attributes it to a 'Plasmonic modulator [126]'; Section 3.1 credits a VπL ≈ 0.21 V·cm to the plasmonic LN modulator of Thomaschewski et al. [141]. These are different device concepts. Because Table 2 is used to benchmark material platforms in Section 2.3, the citation/device mismatch must be corrected before the comparison can be trusted.
  3. [Section 2.2 and Section 5.5] The BTO electro-optic coefficient is presented in inconsistent terms. Section 2.2 states 'r33 > 900 pm/V', Table 1 lists r42 = 150–1300 pm/V, while Section 5.5 gives intrinsic bulk r33 ≈ 105 pm/V and effective values up to ~900 pm/V under optimal poling. The review should distinguish clamped vs unclamped coefficients, intrinsic vs effective values, and r33 vs r42. As written, the material trade-offs in Section 2.3 and the BTO outlook in Section 5.5 rest on an ambiguous number.
  4. [Section 5.5] The claim that 'the highest Q experimentally achieved in an EO-active metasurface remains ~8000' needs clearer provenance. Table 3 lists Q = 8000 for the LNOI qBIC/GMR work [85], but the text also reports passive qBIC Q > 10^5 and an LN PhC microcavity Q = 1.2×10^5 [167]. The 'active' qualifier should be defined (e.g., with electrodes and material interfaces in place), and the comparison should explicitly separate passive Q from actively tunable Q; otherwise the central bottleneck claim is hard to verify.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.1, Fig. 4] The text refers to Fig. 4(c) for Babicheva et al. [136], but the caption for panel (c) describes Kim et al. [138]. The panel/caption assignment should be corrected.
  2. [Section 3.5, Fig. 9] The in-text citations [178] and [179] appear swapped relative to the figure captions: Fig. 9(a) credits [179] and Fig. 9(b) credits [178], while the text assigns [178] to panel (a) and [179] to panel (b). Please reconcile.
  3. [Abstract and Section 1] The abstract and conclusion describe 'six representative mechanisms', but Section 1 lists five categories and Table 3 tabulates six (Mie, qBIC, SLR, GMR, FP, plasmonic). Harmonize the count and the nomenclature.
  4. [Section 5] Section numbering jumps from 5.3 to 5.5; Section 5.4 is missing. Renumber the subsections.
  5. [Throughout] Typographical errors include 'summerized' in the abstract, 'ultra thin' in the abstract, and 'Low-Loss-Litium' in reference 108. A careful proofread is needed.
  6. [Eq. (9)] The Purcell-factor expression as written is dimensionally unconventional. If the intended form involves (λ/n)^3, define n and Veff explicitly and check the prefactor.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: review compiles external results; moderate self-citation concentration is not load-bearing. Table 3's heterogeneous modulation-efficiency entries are a correctness/comparability issue, not a circularity step.

full rationale

This is a review paper, not an original derivation. Its central claims—that EO metasurfaces are a frontier, that six resonance mechanisms span the design space, and that co-optimization of materials, electrodes, and integration is the binding constraint—are supported by a broad external literature (e.g., refs [38], [83], [85], [101], [104], [144], [172], [173]) and by standard textbook formulas (Eqs. 1–20). The authors' own papers ([39], [73], [74], [96], [111], [141], [147], [148], [221]) appear as examples and historical anchors, but no load-bearing conclusion reduces to a self-citation: the 'highest active Q ~8000' claim cites independent ref [85]; the qBIC scaling Q ∝ 1/β² cites Hsu et al. and Kravets et al.; and the Q–bandwidth trade-off is textbook. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction and no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors. The most serious issue in the manuscript is not circularity: Table 3's 'Modulation efficiency/depth' column is defined only as 'relative modulation per applied Volt,' yet rows mix spectral tuning rate (0.001 nm/V for ref [84]), reciprocal-voltage values at different biases (0.015 V⁻¹ at 10 V vs 0.25 V⁻¹ at ±1 V), and undefined entries; Section 4.1's rankings and Section 5.5's 'Q≈8000' claim therefore inherit a comparability problem. Similarly, Section 2.2's 'r33 > 900 pm/V' for BTO conflicts with Section 5.5's 'intrinsic bulk r33 ≈ 105 pm/V.' These are data-quality and consistency concerns, not circular derivations. Because a review derives nothing, the classic circular-derivation failure modes do not apply; the self-citation concentration is notable but not load-bearing, so the score is 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no fitted constants and no invented entities. Its quantitative content is entirely compiled from cited literature, so the ledger below captures the background theory it invokes (clamped EO tensor, Purcell-factor enhancement, photon-lifetime bandwidth limit, resonance-slope amplification) plus two domain assumptions that are load-bearing for its conclusions: the six-mechanism taxonomy, and the comparability of the compiled performance metrics. The latter is weakened by internal inconsistencies identified in the scorecard.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption High-speed EO modulation is governed by the clamped EO tensor r^S; Section 2.1 states 'the EO tensor r used throughout this work refers to the clamped EO tensor r^S'.
    All material benchmarks and modulation formulas assume clamped (GHz-scale) EO coefficients and the simplified uniaxial expressions of Eqs. 7-8; if devices in Table 3 operate where unclamped response or piezoelectric contributions matter, the comparisons drift.
  • standard math The inverse-sum bandwidth rule 1/f_EO^2 = 1/f_RC^2 + 1/f_tau^2 with f_tau = c/(Q*lambda) (Eqs. 11-12) captures the speed limit of resonant EO modulators.
    This textbook resonator result organizes the central efficiency-versus-speed trade-off used to rank mechanisms in Section 4.1.
  • standard math Resonant enhancement scales with the Purcell factor Fp ~ (lambda/n)^3 * Q/V_eff (Eq. 9) and the spectral-slope relation Delta T ~ (dT/dlambda)(dlambda/dn) Delta n (Eq. 10).
    Used in Section 3 to justify why high-Q resonances amplify EO response; it is an approximation, not a bound.
  • domain assumption The six-mechanism taxonomy (Mie, SPP, FP, GMR, qBIC, SLR) is a faithful partition of the EO-metasurface literature.
    An editorial scheme rather than a proven fact; Section 1 lists five categories while the Abstract and Section 4.1 list six, so the partition itself is not stable within the paper.
  • domain assumption Entries in Tables 2 and 3 are accurate and measured under comparable conditions across groups.
    Load-bearing for the comparative conclusions in Section 4.1; known internal failures include the Table 2 row assigning 0.21 V·cm to ref [126] and the BTO r33 > 900 pm/V statement in Section 2.2 contradicting the r33 about 105 pm/V in Section 5.5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electro-Optic Active Metasurfaces for High-Speed Photonic Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JH3ITHT5

@misc{pith2026260800606,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electro-Optic Active Metasurfaces for High-Speed Photonic Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JH3ITHT5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00606}
}
read the original abstract

Metasurfaces are artificially engineered ultrathin nanostructured surfaces, capable of flexibly manipulating light-matter interactions on compact platforms, and thereby of great significance for a wide range of applications within modern optics and photonics, including communications, computing, sensing, and quantum technologies. However, the inherently static nature of conventional metasurfaces severely limits their functionalities and thus range of possible applications. Benefiting from integration of the metasurface platform for shaping optical wavefronts with ultrafast electro-optic (EO) materials, active EO metasurfaces have emerged as a frontier research direction targeting advanced photonic devices. This paper systematically reviews the latest progress in this field, featuring a comprehensive comparison of performances and application scenarios of mainstream EO materials such as lithium niobate, barium titanate and organic EO polymers. Modulation mechanisms based on the Pockels and Kerr effects along with the corresponding active metasurface implementations are summarized. Furthermore, improvements in modulation efficiency enabled by advantageously exploiting resonant structural designs and associated phenomena, including Fabry-Perot resonances, Mie resonances, surface plasmon polaritons, quasi-bound states in the continuum, surface lattice resonances, and guided-mode resonances, are presented and summerized in detail. Current challenges related to metasurface design, nanofabrication, performance and heterogeneous integration are also discussed. Finally, future research directions are outlined, highlighting interdisciplinary developments, novel material engineering, and AI-assisted design as key pathways to enable practical use of active EO metasurfaces in modern optics and photonics, including quantum information technologies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

241 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [124]

    500 GHz plasmonic 32 Mach–Zehnder modulator enabling sub- THz microwave photo nics

    Burla, M., Hoessbacher, C., Heni, W., Haffner, C., Fedoryshyn, Y ., et al. 500 GHz plasmonic 32 Mach–Zehnder modulator enabling sub- THz microwave photo nics. APL Photonics 4, 056106 33 (2019). 34

    2019

  2. [196]

    Macleod, H. A. Thin-Film Optical Filters. (CRC Press, 2010). 45

    work page 2010

  3. [152]

    K., Ruan, Y ., et al

    Vakili Tabatabaei, M., Ojanen, S.-P., Viheriälä, J., Alam Bhuiyan, I. K., Ruan, Y ., et al. Electro-45 optically tunable barium–strontium–titanate filter for the 2 μm wavelength range. APL Photonics 46 11, 046108 (2026). 47

    2026

  4. [190]

    & Kivshar, Y

    Zhao, J., Koshelev, K. & Kivshar, Y . Robust Bound States in the Continuum in Dielectric 33 Metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 9, 614–621 (2022). 34

    work page 2022

  5. [126]

    50GHz gallium arsenide electro -38 optic modulators for spaceborne telecommunications

    Walker, R., Cameron, N., Zhou, Y ., Main, C., Hoy, G., et al. 50GHz gallium arsenide electro -38 optic modulators for spaceborne telecommunications. in International Conference on Space 39 Optics — ICSO 2018 vol. 11180 2683 (SPIE, 2019); 40

    2018

  6. [38]

    G., Kim, S

    Park, J., Jeong, B. G., Kim, S. I., Lee, D., Kim, J., et al. All-solid-state spatial light modulator 34 with independent phase and amplitude control for three -dimensional LiDAR applications. Nat 35 Nanotechnol 16, 69–76 (2021). 36

    2021

  7. [141]

    A., et al

    Kim, J., Sokhoyan, R., Yi, M., Han, S., Atwater, H. A., et al. Overcoming Barriers to Dynamic 21 Phase-Only Modulation in Transmissive Metasurfaces via Diffraction Control. ACS Nano 20, 22 6622–6631 (2026). 23

    2026

  8. [85]

    & Levy, U

    Chen, Z., Mazurski, N., Engelberg, J. & Levy, U. Tunable Transmissive Metasurface Based on 43 Thin-Film Lithium Niobate. ACS Photonics 12, 1174–1183 (2025). 44

    2025

  9. [167]

    W., Zhen, B., Stone, A

    Hsu, C. W., Zhen, B., Stone, A. D., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljačić, M. Bound states in the 27 continuum. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16048 (2016). 28

    2016

Show all 241 references
  1. [1]

    I., Brongersma, M

    Kuznetsov, A. I., Brongersma, M. L., Yao, J., Chen, M. K., Levy, U., et al. Roadmap for Optical 6 Metasurfaces. ACS Photonics (2024) doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.3c00457. 7

    2024 doi

  2. [2]

    The charge -20 blocking-layer strategy demonstrated by Xu et al

    chromophores is particularly attractive, as the modulator figure of merit 𝑉𝑉𝜋𝜋𝐿𝐿 scales inversely with 19 n3r33; even moderate increases in n would yield substantial device -level improvements. The charge -20 blocking-layer strategy demonstrated by Xu et al. represents a criti...

  3. [3]

    Zheludev, N. I. & Kivshar, Y . S. From metamaterials to metadevices. Nat Mater 11, 917 (2012). 10

    2012

  4. [4]

    L., Pala, R

    Brongersma, M. L., Pala, R. A., Altug, H., Capasso, F., Chen, W. T., et al. The second optical 11 metasurface revolution: moving from science to technology. Nat. Rev. E lectr. Eng. 2, 125–143 12 (2025). 13

    2025

  5. [5]

    high-Q–low-speed

    Challenges and Future Perspectives 4 This review has systematically presented EO metasurfaces encompassing diverse modulation 5 mechanisms, including Mie resonances, qBICs, SLRs, GMR, FP cavities, and plasmonic hybrid 6 structures. Synthesized with the comparative analysis of ...

    1980

  6. [6]

    Conclusion 10 In summary, the next generation of EO metasurfaces will emerge not from any single breakthrough 11 but from the co- optimization of EO materials, resonance –electrode architectures, and heterogeneous 12 integration processes. The field is transitioning from demon...

  7. [7]

    Gao, Y . & Ma, Y . Fundamentals to emerging concepts and applications of metasurfaces for flat 8 optics: a tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photonics 17, 789–1058 (2025). 9

    2025

  8. [8]

    & Faraon, A

    Arbabi, A. & Faraon, A. Advances in optical metalenses. Nat. Photonics 17, 16–25 (2022). 14

    2022

  9. [9]

    & Tsai, D

    Lin, R., Zhou, J., Chen, C. & Tsai, D. P. Challenges and opportunities of metalenses. Nat. Rev. 15 Electr. Eng. 3, 214–225 (2026). 16

    2026

  10. [10]

    & Rho, J

    Jung, C., Lee, E. & Rho, J. The rise of electrically tunable metasurfaces. Sci. Adv. 10, eado8964 17 (2024). 18

    2024

  11. [11]

    Abdelraouf, O. A. M., Wang, Z., Liu, H., Dong, Z., Wang, Q., et al. Recent Advances in Tunable 19 Metasurfaces: Materials, Design, and Applications. ACS Nano 16, 13339–13369 (2022). 20

    2022

  12. [12]

    & Bozhevolnyi, S

    Ding, F., Meng, C. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Electrically tunable optical metasurfaces. Photonics 21 Insights 3, R07 (2024). 22

    2024

  13. [13]

    Dorrah, A. H. & Capasso, F. Tunable structured light with flat optics. Science 376, eabi6860 23 (2022). 24

    2022

  14. [14]

    M., Lagoudakis, K

    Shaltout, A. M., Lagoudakis, K. G., Van De Groep, J., Kim, S. J., Vučković, J., et al. 25 Spatiotemporal light control with frequency-gradient metasurfaces. Science 365, 374–377 (2019). 26

    2019

  15. [15]

    J., Rivero-Baleine, C

    Gu, T., Kim, H. J., Rivero-Baleine, C. & Hu, J. Reconfigurable metasurfaces towards commercial 27 success. Nat. Photonics 17, 48–58 (2023). 28

    2023

  16. [16]

    M., Horie, Y ., Faraji-Dana, M., et al

    Arbabi, E., Arbabi, A., Kamali, S. M., Horie, Y ., Faraji-Dana, M., et al. MEMS-tunable dielectric 29 metasurface lens. Nat. Commun. 9, 812 (2018). 30

    2018

  17. [17]

    Zhu, Z., Tang, M., Thrane, P. C. V ., Wei, K., Bozhevolnyi, S. I., et al. Microelectromechanical 31 Systems–Tunable Reflective Metalenses for Switchable Focusing between Two Arbitrary Phase 32 States. ACS Nano 20, 12890–12900 (2026). 33

    2026

  18. [18]

    Meng, C., Thrane, P. C. V ., Wang, C., Ding, F. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. MEMS-tunable topological 34 bilayer metasurfaces for reconfigurable dual-state phase control. Optica 11, 1556–1566 (2024). 35

    2024

  19. [19]

    Meng, C., Thrane, P. C. V ., Ding, F., Gjess ing, J., Thomaschewski, M., et al. Dynamic 36 piezoelectric MEMS-based optical metasurfaces. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg5639 (2021). 37

    2021

  20. [20]

    L., Cihan, A

    Holsteen, A. L., Cihan, A. F. & Brongersma, M. L. Temporal color mixing and dynamic beam 38 shaping with silicon metasurfaces. Science 365, 257–260 (2019). 39

    2019

  21. [21]

    M., Arbabi, E., Arbabi, A., Horie, Y

    Kamali, S. M., Arbabi, E., Arbabi, A., Horie, Y . & Faraon, A. Highly tunable elastic dielectric 40 metasurface lenses. Laser Photonics Rev. 10, 1002–1008 (2016). 41

    2016

  22. [22]

    Active terahertz beam steering based on 42 mechanical deformation of liquid crystal elastomer metasurface

    Zhuang, X., Zhang, W., Wang, K., Gu, Y ., An, Y ., et al. Active terahertz beam steering based on 42 mechanical deformation of liquid crystal elastomer metasurface. Light Sci. Appl. 12, 14 (2023). 43

    2023

  23. [23]

    & Rho, J

    Jeon, N., Noh, J., Jung, C. & Rho, J. Electrically tunable metasurfaces: from direct to indirect 44 mechanisms. New J. Phys. 24, 075001 (2022). 45 52

    2022

  24. [24]

    V ., Yang, Z., Shvedov, V

    Izdebskaya, Y . V ., Yang, Z., Shvedov, V . G., Neshev, D. N. & Shadrivov, I. V . Multifunctional 1 Metasurface Tuning by Liquid Crystals in Three Dimensions. Nano Lett. 23, 9825–9831 (2023). 2

    2023

  25. [25]

    U., Michaeli, L

    Hail, C. U., Michaeli, L. & Atwater, H. A. Ultrafast, reconfigurable all-optical beam steering and 3 spatial light modulation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 1–8 (2026) doi:10.1038/s41565-026-02199-w. 4

    2026 doi

  26. [26]

    Horie, Y ., Arbabi, A., Arbabi, E., Kamali, S. M. & Faraon, A. High- Speed, Phase -Dominant 5 Spatial Light Modulation with Silicon-Based Active Resonant Antennas. ACS Photonics 5, 1711–6 1717 (2018). 7

    2018

  27. [27]

    Electrochemically controlled metasurfaces 8 with high-contrast switching at visible frequencies

    Kaissner, R., Li, J., Lu, W., Li, X., Neubrech, F., et al. Electrochemically controlled metasurfaces 8 with high-contrast switching at visible frequencies. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd9450 (2021). 9

    2021

  28. [28]

    W., Kim, Y

    Moon, C. W., Kim, Y . & Hyun, J. K. Active electrochemical high- contrast gratings as on/off 10 switchable and color tunable pixels. Nat. Commun. 13, 3391 (2022). 11

    2022

  29. [29]

    Liu, X., Duan, X., Li, B., Zheng, Z. & Li, Q. Liqui d Crystal on Metasurfaces Toward Dynamic 12 Photonic Control. Adv. Funct. Mater. e29188 (2026) doi:10.1002/adfm.202529188. 13

    2026 doi

  30. [30]

    Integrated Multifunctional Computational 14 Imaging Platform Using Cascaded Ele ctrically Tunable Liquid Crystal Elements

    Wu, X., Jiang, X., Xie, Y ., Zhou, Z., Zhang, X., et al. Integrated Multifunctional Computational 14 Imaging Platform Using Cascaded Ele ctrically Tunable Liquid Crystal Elements. Laser 15 Photonics Rev. 20, e02040 (2026). 16

    2026

  31. [31]

    Phase-17 only transmissive spatial light modulator based on tunable dielectric meta surface

    Li, S.-Q., Xu, X., Maruthiyodan Veetil, R., Valuckas, V ., Paniagua-Domínguez, R., et al. Phase-17 only transmissive spatial light modulator based on tunable dielectric meta surface. Science 364, 18 1087–1090 (2019). 19

    2019

  32. [32]

    Liquid crystal-integrated metasurfaces for 20 an active photonic platform

    Kang, D., Heo, H., Yang, Y ., Seong, J., Kim, H., et al. Liquid crystal-integrated metasurfaces for 20 an active photonic platform. Opto-Electron. Adv. 7, 230216–230216 (2024). 21

    2024

  33. [33]

    Y ., et al

    Zhang, Y ., Fowler, C., Liang, J., Azhar, B., Shalaginov, M. Y ., et al. Electrically reconfigurable 22 non-volatile metasurface using low -loss optical phase -change material. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 23 661–666 (2021). 24

    2021

  34. [34]

    Electrical tuning of phase-25 change antennas and metasurfaces

    Wang, Y ., Landreman, P., Schoen, D., Okabe, K., Marshall, A., et al. Electrical tuning of phase-25 change antennas and metasurfaces. Nat Nanotechnol 16, 667–672 (2021). 26

    2021

  35. [35]

    L., Elder, D

    Benea-Chelmus, I.-C., Meretska, M. L., Elder, D. L., Tamagnone, M., Dalton, L. R., et al. Electro-27 optic spatial light modulator from an engineered organic layer. Nat. Commun. 12, 5928 (2021). 28

    2021

  36. [36]

    A Purcell -enabled monolayer 29 semiconductor free-space optical modulator

    Li, Q., Song, J.- H., Xu, F., van de Groep, J., Hong, J., et al. A Purcell -enabled monolayer 29 semiconductor free-space optical modulator. Nat. Photonics 17, 897–903 (2023). 30

    2023

  37. [37]

    W., Tadbier, W., Kindness, S

    Xia, R., Almond, N. W., Tadbier, W., Kindness, S. J., Degl’Innocenti, R., et al. Achieving 100% 31 amplitude modulation depth in the terahertz range with graphene -based tuneable capacitance 32 metamaterials. Light Sci. Appl. 14, 256 (2025). 33

    2025

  38. [39]

    Y ., Sokhoyan, R., Huang, I., et al

    Sisler, J., Thureja, P., Grajower, M. Y ., Sokhoyan, R., Huang, I., et al. Electrically tunable space–37 time metasurfaces at optical frequencies. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 1491–1498 (2024). 38

    2024

  39. [40]

    U., Sisler, J., Foley, M., et al

    Thureja, P., Sokhoyan, R., Hail, C. U., Sisler, J., Foley, M., et al. Toward a universal metasurface 39 for optical imaging, communication, and computation. Nanophotonics 11, 3745–3768 (2022). 40

    2022

  40. [41]

    Highly Efficient Slow-Light Mach–Zehnder 41 Modulator Achieving 0.21 V cm Efficiency with Bandwidth Surpassing 110 GHz

    Shen, J., Zhang, Y ., Zhang, L., Li, J., Feng, C., et al. Highly Efficient Slow-Light Mach–Zehnder 41 Modulator Achieving 0.21 V cm Efficiency with Bandwidth Surpassing 110 GHz. Laser 42 Photonics Rev. 19, 2401092 (2025). 43

    2025

  41. [42]

    & Bozhevolnyi, S

    Damgaard-Carstensen, C. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Nonlocal electro- optic metasurfaces for free -44 space light modulation. Nanophotonics 12, 2953–2962 (2023). 45

    2023

  42. [43]

    & Bozhevolnyi, S

    Ding, F., Pors, A. & Bozhevolnyi, S. Gradient metasurfaces : A review of fundamentals and 46 applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. Phys. Soc. G. B. 81, (2017). 47

    2017

  43. [44]

    Bierlein, J. D. & Vanherzeele, H. Potassium titanyl phosphate: properties and new applications. 48 JOSA B 6, 622–633 (1989). 49

    1989

  44. [45]

    Highly efficient lead zirconate titanate ring 50 53 modulator

    Liu, G., Yu, H., Ban, D., Li, B., W ei, G., et al. Highly efficient lead zirconate titanate ring 50 53 modulator. APL Photonics 9, 066111 (2024). 1

    2024

  45. [46]

    A., Yin, Y ., Sato, H., et al

    Mao, J., Uemura, F., Yazdani, S. A., Yin, Y ., Sato, H., et al. Ultra-fast perovskite electro -optic 2 modulator and multi-band transmission up to 300 Gbit s−1. Commun. Mater. 5, 1–8 (2024). 3

    2024

  46. [47]

    Walker, R. G. & Zhou, Y . The Design of 50 GHz Gallium Arsenide Electro- Optic Modulator 4 Arrays for Satellite Communications Systems. Front. Phys. 9, 636002 (2021). 5

    2021

  47. [48]

    J., Jang, J., Badloe, T., Khadir, S., et al

    Kim, I., Martins, R. J., Jang, J., Badloe, T., Khadir, S., et al. Nanophotonics for light detection 6 and ranging technology. Nat Nanotechnol 16, 508–524 (2021). 7

    2021

  48. [49]

    Towards an ultrafast 3D imaging scanning LiDAR 8 system: a review

    Li, Z., Han, Y ., Wu, L., Zang, Z., Dai, M., et al. Towards an ultrafast 3D imaging scanning LiDAR 8 system: a review. Photonics Res. 12, 1709–1729 (2024). 9

    2024

  49. [50]

    P., Xue, J., Lim, L

    Li, N., Ho, C. P., Xue, J., Lim, L. W., Chen, G., et al. A Progress Review on Solid-State LiDAR 10 and Nanophotonics-Based LiDAR Sensors. Laser Photonics Rev. 16, 2100511 (2022). 11

    2022

  50. [51]

    Q., Dai, J

    Yang, H. Q., Dai, J. Y ., Li, H. D., Wu, L., Shen, Z. H., et al. Adaptively programmable 12 metasurface for intelligent wireless communications in complex environments. Nat. Commun. 16, 13 6070 (2025). 14

    2025

  51. [52]

    He, J., Dong, T. & Xu, Y . Review of Photonic Integrated Optical Phased Arrays for Space Optical 15 Communication. IEEE Access 8, 188284–188298 (2020). 16

    2020

  52. [53]

    Hybrid Meta-Optics Enable Large Spatial-17 Spectral-Bandwidth Thermal Imaging for Augmented Reality Application

    Tang, M., Xing, Y ., Liu, C., Zhang, G., Zhu, Z., et al. Hybrid Meta-Optics Enable Large Spatial-17 Spectral-Bandwidth Thermal Imaging for Augmented Reality Application. Laser Photonics Rev. 18 e71431 (2026) doi:10.1002/lpor.71431. 19

    2026 doi

  53. [54]

    Metasurface-enabled augmented 20 reality display: a review

    Zeyang, L., Danyan, W., Hao, G., Moxin, L., Huixian, Z., et al. Metasurface-enabled augmented 20 reality display: a review. Adv. Photonics 5, 034001 (2023). 21

    2023

  54. [55]

    & Wu, S.- T

    Xiong, J., Hsiang, E.- L., He, Z., Zhan, T. & Wu, S.- T. Augmented reality and virtual re ality 22 displays: emerging technologies and future perspectives. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 216 (2021). 23

    2021

  55. [56]

    S., Huang, Y

    Li, Z., Pestourie, R., Park, J. S., Huang, Y . W., Johnson, S. G., et al. Inverse design enables large-24 scale high-performance meta-optics reshaping virtual reality. Nat Commun 13, 2409 (2022). 25

    2022

  56. [57]

    Full-colour 3D holographic 26 augmented-reality displays with metasurface waveguides

    Gopakumar, M., Lee, G.- Y ., Choi, S., Chao, B., Peng, Y ., et al. Full-colour 3D holographic 26 augmented-reality displays with metasurface waveguides. Nature (2024) doi:10.1038/s41586-27 024-07386-0. 28

    2024 doi

  57. [58]

    M., Faraji-Dana, M

    Kwon, H., Arbabi, E., Kamali, S. M., Faraji-Dana, M. & Faraon, A. Single-shot quantitative phase 29 gradient microscopy using a system of multifunctional metasurfaces. Nat. Photonics 14, 109–114 30 (2019). 31

    2019

  58. [59]

    High-Refractive-Index Chip with 32 Periodically Fine -Tuning Gratings for Tunable Virtual -Wavevector Spatial Frequency Shift 33 Universal Super-Resolution Imaging

    Tang, M., Han, Y ., Ye, D., Zhang, Q., Pang, C., et al. High-Refractive-Index Chip with 32 Periodically Fine -Tuning Gratings for Tunable Virtual -Wavevector Spatial Frequency Shift 33 Universal Super-Resolution Imaging. Adv. Sci. 9, 2103835 (2022). 34

    2022

  59. [60]

    Dielectric Metasurface for S ynchronously 35 Spiral Phase Contrast and Bright-Field Imaging

    Zhang, Y ., Lin, P., Huo, P., Liu, M., Ren, Y ., et al. Dielectric Metasurface for S ynchronously 35 Spiral Phase Contrast and Bright-Field Imaging. Nano Lett. 23, 2991–2997 (2023). 36

    2023

  60. [61]

    On-Chip Super-Resolution Imaging with 37 Fluorescent Polymer Films

    Pang, C., Li, J., Tang, M., Wang, J., Mela, I., et al. On-Chip Super-Resolution Imaging with 37 Fluorescent Polymer Films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1900126 (2019). 38

    2019

  61. [62]

    Quantitative phase contrast imaging with a 39 nonlocal angle-selective metasurface

    Ji, A., Song, J.-H., Li, Q., Xu, F., Tsai, C.- T., et al. Quantitative phase contrast imaging with a 39 nonlocal angle-selective metasurface. Nat. Commun. 13, 7848 (2022). 40

    2022

  62. [63]

    T., Veli, M., Luo, Y ., et al

    Lin, X., Rivenson, Y ., Yardimci, N. T., Veli, M., Luo, Y ., et al. All-optical machine learning using 41 diffractive deep neural networks. Science 361, 1004–1008 (2018). 42

    2018

  63. [64]

    All-analog photoelectronic chip for 43 high-speed vision tasks

    Chen, Y ., Nazhamaiti, M., Xu, H., Meng, Y ., Zhou, T., et al. All-analog photoelectronic chip for 43 high-speed vision tasks. Nature 623, 48–57 (2023). 44

    2023

  64. [65]

    Optical metasurfaces for general vision processing 45 on the edge

    Peng, J., Luo, M., Han, Y ., Wu, S., Li, H., et al. Optical metasurfaces for general vision processing 45 on the edge. Nature 1–10 (2026) doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10635-z. 46

    2026 doi

  65. [66]

    G., Onodera, T., Stein, M

    Wright, L. G., Onodera, T., Stein, M. M., Wang, T., Schachter, D. T., et al. Deep physical neural 47 networks trained with backpropagation. Nature 601, 549–555 (2022). 48

    2022

  66. [67]

    Fully forward mode training for optical neural 49 networks

    Xue, Z., Zhou, T., Xu, Z., Yu, S., Dai, Q., et al. Fully forward mode training for optical neural 49 networks. Nature 632, 280–286 (2024). 50 54

    2024

  67. [68]

    Solving integral equations in 1 free space with inverse-designed ultrathin optical metagratings

    Cordaro, A., Edwards, B., Nikkhah, V ., Alù, A., Engheta, N., et al. Solving integral equations in 1 free space with inverse-designed ultrathin optical metagratings. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 365–372 2 (2023). 3

    2023

  68. [69]

    M., Wright, L

    Wang, T., Sohoni, M. M., Wright, L. G., Stein, M. M., Ma, S.- Y ., et al. Image sensing with 4 multilayer nonlinear optical neural networks. Nat. Photonics 17, 408–415 (2023). 5

    2023

  69. [70]

    Large-scale neuromor phic optoelectronic 6 computing with a reconfigurable diffractive processing unit

    Zhou, T., Lin, X., Wu, J., Chen, Y ., Xie, H., et al. Large-scale neuromor phic optoelectronic 6 computing with a reconfigurable diffractive processing unit. Nat. Photonics 15, 367–373 (2021). 7

    2021

  70. [71]

    I., Zhang, X., Huo, Y ., et al

    Zheng, H., Liu, Q., Kravchenko, I. I., Zhang, X., Huo, Y ., et al. Multichannel meta-imagers for 8 accelerating machine vision. Nat. Nanotechnol. (2024) doi:10.1038/s41565-023-01557-2. 9

    2024 doi

  71. [72]

    & others

    Gao, T. & others. Programmable metasurfaces for quantum photonics. Adv. Photonics 7, 012001 10 (2025). 11

    2025

  72. [73]

    de, Gandolfi, M., Vi ncenti, M

    Ceglia, D. de, Gandolfi, M., Vi ncenti, M. A., Tognazzi, A., Franceschini, P., et al. Transient 12 guided-mode resonance metasurfaces with phase- transition materials. Opt. Lett. 48, 2961–2964 13 (2023). 14

    2023

  73. [74]

    & Rho, J

    Kim, J., Jeong, M., Jung, C., Seong, J. & Rho, J. Electro -Active Metasurfaces Controlling 15 Exceptional Topological Phase Through Low -V oltage Operation on Conductive Polymer. Adv. 16 Funct. Mater. 35, 2501916 (2025). 17

    2025

  74. [75]

    & Jang, M

    Han, S., Kong, J., Choi, J., Chegal, W. & Jang, M. S. Single -gate electro-optic beam switching 18 metasurfaces. Light Sci. Appl. 14, 1–11 (2025). 19

    2025

  75. [76]

    & Bozhevolnyi, S

    Thomaschewski, M. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Pockels modulation in integrated nanophotonics. Appl. 20 Phys. Rev. 9, 021311 (2022). 21

    2022

  76. [77]

    Damgaard-Carstensen, C., Yezekyan, T., Brongersma, M. L. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Highly 22 Efficient, Tunable, Electro-Optic, Reflective Metasurfaces Based on Quasi -Bound States in the 23 Continuum. ACS Nano 19, 11999–12006 (2025). 24

    2025

  77. [78]

    Electro-Optic Lithium Niobate Metasurface 25 Enabling Dynamic Polarization Control

    Liu, W., Liu, J., Wu, W., Qu, L., Zhang, Y ., et al. Electro-Optic Lithium Niobate Metasurface 25 Enabling Dynamic Polarization Control. ACS Ph otonics (2026) 26 doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.5c02030. 27

    2026 doi

  78. [79]

    Barium titanate and lithium 28 niobate permittivity and Pockels coefficients from megahertz to sub- terahertz frequencies

    Chelladurai, D., Kohli, M., Winiger, J., Moor, D., Messner, A., et al. Barium titanate and lithium 28 niobate permittivity and Pockels coefficients from megahertz to sub- terahertz frequencies. Nat. 29 Mater. 24, 868–875 (2025). 30

    2025

  79. [80]

    High-linearity wide-bandwidth integrated thin-31 film lithium niobate modulator based on a dual -optical-mode co -modulated configuration

    Tan, H., Zhang, J., Wang, J., Fu, S., Yu, S., et al. High-linearity wide-bandwidth integrated thin-31 film lithium niobate modulator based on a dual -optical-mode co -modulated configuration. 32 Photonics Res. 13, 817–826 (2025). 33

    2025

  80. [81]

    Analysis of 34 photorefractive optical damage in lithium niobate: application to planar waveguides

    Villarroel, J., Carnicero, J., Luedtke, F., Carrascosa, M., García -Cabañes, A., et al. Analysis of 34 photorefractive optical damage in lithium niobate: application to planar waveguides. Opt Express 35 18, 20852–20861 (2010). 36

    2010

  81. [82]

    Coherent Synthesis of Silicon Optical Phased 37 Arrays toward Enhanced Power and Aperture

    Yan, X., Li, F., Wang, H., Feng, X., Xie, W., et al. Coherent Synthesis of Silicon Optical Phased 37 Arrays toward Enhanced Power and Aperture. ACS Photonics 13, 373–384 (2026). 38

    2026

  82. [83]

    Recent Progress in Lithium Niobate: Optical 39 Damage, Defect Simulation, and On-Chip Devices

    Kong, Y ., Bo, F., Wang, W., Zheng, D., Liu, H., et al. Recent Progress in Lithium Niobate: Optical 39 Damage, Defect Simulation, and On-Chip Devices. Adv. Mater. 32, 1806452 (2020). 40

    2020

  83. [84]

    Integrated electro-optics on thin- film lithium 41 niobate

    Hu, Y ., Zhu, D., Lu, S., Zhu, X., Song, Y ., et al. Integrated electro-optics on thin- film lithium 41 niobate. Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 237–254 (2025). 42

    2025

  84. [86]

    Tunable Metasurface Using 45 Thin-Film Lithium Niobate in the Telecom Regime

    Weiss, A., Frydendahl, C., Bar-David, J., Zektzer, R., Edrei, E., et al. Tunable Metasurface Using 45 Thin-Film Lithium Niobate in the Telecom Regime. ACS Photonics 9, 605–612 (2022). 46

    2022

  85. [87]

    J., Panuski, C

    Trajtenberg-Mills, S., Elkabbash, M., Brabec, C. J., Panuski, C. L. & Englund, D. R. LNoS: 47 lithium niobate-on-silicon spatial light modulator. Optica 13, 707–716 (2026). 48

    2026

  86. [88]

    A., et al

    Di Francescantonio, A., Sabatti, A., Weigand, H., Bailly- Rioufreyt, E., Vincenti, M. A., et al. 49 Efficient GHz electro -optical modulation with a nonlocal lithium niobate metasurface in the 50 55 linear and nonlinear regime. Nat. Commun. 16, 7000 (2025). 1

    2025

  87. [89]

    Self-buffered epitaxy of barium titanate on 2 oxide insulators enables high- performance electro -optic modulators

    Deng, C., He, Y ., Yang, W., Yu, H., Hong, Z., et al. Self-buffered epitaxy of barium titanate on 2 oxide insulators enables high- performance electro -optic modulators. L ight Sci. Appl. 15, 21 3 (2026). 4

    2026

  88. [90]

    Periodic Domain Inversion in Single Crystal 5 Barium Titanate-on-Insulator Thin Film

    Aashna, P., Lin, H.-L., Cao, Y ., Yin, Y ., Gao, Y ., et al. Periodic Domain Inversion in Single Crystal 5 Barium Titanate-on-Insulator Thin Film. Adv. Sci. 11, 2406248 (2024). 6

    2024

  89. [91]

    C., Saerens, G., Benedek, P., Winiger, J., et al

    Talts, Ü., Weigand, H. C., Saerens, G., Benedek, P., Winiger, J., et al. Sol–Gel Barium Titanate 7 Nanohole Array as a Nonlinear Metasurface and a Photonic Crystal. Small 19, 2304355 (2023). 8

    2023

  90. [92]

    L., Cheung, E

    Cao, Y ., Tan, S. L., Cheung, E. J. H., Siew, S. Y ., Li, C., et al. A Barium Titanate -on-Oxide 9 Insulator Optoelectronics Platform. Adv. Mater. 33, 2101128 (2021). 10

    2021

  91. [93]

    Ultralow-Power Tuning and Nonvolatile 11 Operation on a Hybrid Silicon Nitride/Barium Titanate Integrated Photonics Platform

    Wang, X., Tu, J., Sun, M., Zhou, W., Cheng, Z., et al. Ultralow-Power Tuning and Nonvolatile 11 Operation on a Hybrid Silicon Nitride/Barium Titanate Integrated Photonics Platform. ACS Nano 12 19, 42188–42197 (2025). 13

    2025

  92. [94]

    High‐Q Monolithic Ring 14 Resonators in Low‐Loss Barium Titanate on Silicon

    Raju, A., Hungund, D., Krueger, D., Dong, Z., Sakotic, Z., et al. High‐Q Monolithic Ring 14 Resonators in Low‐Loss Barium Titanate on Silicon. Laser Photonics Rev. 19, 2402086 (2025). 15

    2025

  93. [95]

    E., Messner, A., Castera, P., et al

    Abel, S., Eltes, F., Ortmann, J. E., Messner, A., Castera, P., et al. Large Pockels effect in micro- 16 and nanostructured barium titanate integrated on silicon. Nat. Mater. 18, 42–47 (2019). 17

    2019

  94. [96]

    Dielectric, elastic, 18 piezoelectric, electro-optic, and elasto-optic tensors of BaTiO3 crystals

    Zgonik, M., Bernasconi, P., Duelli, M., Schlesser, R., Günter, P., et al. Dielectric, elastic, 18 piezoelectric, electro-optic, and elasto-optic tensors of BaTiO3 crystals. Phys. Rev. B 50, 5941–19 5949 (1994). 20

    1994

  95. [97]

    & Zhang, Y

    Wen, Y ., Chen, H., Wu, Z., Li, W. & Zhang, Y . Fabrication and photonic applications of Si -21 integrated LiNbO3 and BaTiO3 ferroelectric thin films. APL Mater. 12, 020601 (2024). 22

    2024

  96. [98]

    P., Verbist, J., Neyts, K., Kuyken, B., et al

    Alexander, K., George, J. P., Verbist, J., Neyts, K., Kuyken, B., et al. Nanophotonic Pockels 23 modulators on a silicon nitride platform. Nat. Commun. 9, 3444 (2018). 24

    2018

  97. [99]

    Yezekyan, T., Thomaschewski, M., Thrane, P. C. V . & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Plasmonic electro‐optic 25 modulators on lead zirconate titanate platform. Nanophotonics 13, 3591–3598 (2024). 26

    2024

  98. [100]

    High electro-optic coefficient lead zirconate 27 titanate films toward low -power and compact modulators

    Ban, D., Liu, G., Yu, H., Sun, X., Deng, N., et al. High electro-optic coefficient lead zirconate 27 titanate films toward low -power and compact modulators. Opt. Mater. Express 11, 1733–1741 28 (2021). 29

    2021

  99. [101]

    Thin-Film Lead Zirconate Titanate Nanobeam 30 Electro-Optic Modulator

    Yu, H., Xie, Y ., Li, C., Wang, J., Yang, C., et al. Thin-Film Lead Zirconate Titanate Nanobeam 30 Electro-Optic Modulator. ACS Photonics 12, 1015–1021 (2025). 31

    2025

  100. [102]

    R., Sullivan, P

    Dalton, L. R., Sullivan, P. A. & Bale, D. H. Electric Field Poled Organic Electro-optic Materials: 32 State of the Art and Future Prospects. Chem. Rev. 110, 25–55 (2010). 33

    2010

  101. [103]

    L., Johnson, L

    Xu, H., Elder, D. L., Johnson, L. E., de Coene, Y ., Hammond, S. R., et al. Electro-Optic Activity 34 in Excess of 1000 pm V−1 Achieved via Theory -Guided Organic Chromophore Design. Adv. 35 Mater. 33, 2104174 (2021). 36

    2021

  102. [104]

    & Tanemura, T

    Soma, G., Ariu, K., Karakida, S., Tsubai, Y . & Tanemura, T. Subvolt high- speed free- space 37 modulator with electro-optic metasurface. Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 1625–1632 (2025). 38

    2025

  103. [105]

    Dalton, L. R. Organic electro- optic materials: theory and experiment, devices, and applications 39 [Invited]. Opt. Mater. Express 15, 2037–2055 (2025). 40

  104. [106]

    & Faraon, A

    Zheng, T., Gu, Y ., Kwon, H., Roberts, G. & Faraon, A. Dynamic light manipulation via silicon-41 organic slot metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 15, 1557 (2024). 42

    2024

  105. [107]

    L., Elder, D

    Benea-Chelmus, I.-C., Mason, S., Meretska, M. L., Elder, D. L., Kazakov, D., et al. Gigahertz 43 free-space electro-optic modulators based on Mie resonances. Nat. Commun. 13, 3170 (2022). 44

    2022

  106. [108]

    & Benea-Chelmus, I.-C

    Basiri, Z., Tomasino, A., Jülg, G., Lanfranchi, A. & Benea-Chelmus, I.-C. Metasurface-controlled 45 high-speed tunable external cavity lasers. (2025) doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.16499. 46

    2025 doi

  107. [109]

    & Lončar, M

    Wang, C., Zhang, M., Stern, B., Lipson, M. & Lončar, M. Nanophotonic lithium niobate electro-47 optic modulators. Opt. Express 26, 1547–1555 (2018). 48

    2018

  108. [110]

    J., Li, X

    Krasnokutska, I., Tambasco, J.- L. J., Li, X. & Peruzzo, A. Ultra -low loss photonic ci rcuits in 49 lithium niobate on insulator. Opt. Express 26, 897–904 (2018). 50 56

    2018

  109. [111]

    Long Low-Loss-Litium Niobate on Insulator 1 Waveguides with Sub-Nanometer Surface Roughness

    Wu, R., Wang, M., Xu, J., Qi, J., Chu, W., et al. Long Low-Loss-Litium Niobate on Insulator 1 Waveguides with Sub-Nanometer Surface Roughness. Nanomaterials 8, 910 (2018). 2

    2018

  110. [112]

    Cai, L., Han, S. L. H. & Hu, H. Waveguides in single-crystal lithium niobate thin film by proton 3 exchange. Opt. Express 23, 1240–1248 (2015). 4

    2015

  111. [113]

    Integrated lithium niobate 5 electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages

    Wang, C., Zhang, M., Chen, X., Bertrand, M., Shams-Ansari, A., et al. Integrated lithium niobate 5 electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages. Nature 562, 101–104 (2018). 6

    2018

  112. [114]

    A., Wolff, C

    Thomaschewski, M., Zenin, V . A., Wolff, C. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Plasmonic monolithic lithium 7 niobate directional coupler switches. Nat. Commun. 11, 748 (2020). 8

    2020

  113. [115]

    K., Liu, Z., Ho, S.- T., et al

    Girouard, P., Chen, P., Jeong, Y . K., Liu, Z., Ho, S.- T., et al. χ(2) Modulator With 40- GHz 9 Modulation Utilizing BaTiO3 Photonic Crystal Waveguides. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 53, 1–10 10 (2017). 11

    2017

  114. [116]

    E., Caimi, D., Siegwart, H., Gentile, A

    Eltes, F., Villarreal-Garcia, G. E., Caimi, D., Siegwart, H., Gentile, A. A., et al. An integrated 12 optical modulator operating at cryogenic temperatures. Nat. Mater. 19, 1164–1168 (2020). 13

    2020

  115. [117]

    Plasmonic Ferroelectric 14 Modulator Monolithically Integrated on SiN for 216 GBd Data Transmission

    Kohli, M., Chelladurai, D., Messner, A., Horst, Y ., Moor, D., et al. Plasmonic Ferroelectric 14 Modulator Monolithically Integrated on SiN for 216 GBd Data Transmission. J. Light. Technol. 15 41, 3825–3831 (2023). 16

    2023

  116. [118]

    B., Murakami, K

    Suzuki, H., Othman, M. B., Murakami, K. & Hayashi, S. K. Low -Temperature Processing of 17 Ferroelectric Pb(Zr0.53T i0.47)O3 Thin Film from Molecular -Designed Alkoxide Precursor 18 Solution. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 4896 (1996). 19

    1996

  117. [119]

    B., et al

    Heni, W., Fedoryshyn, Y ., Baeuerle, B., Josten, A., Hoessbacher, C. B., et al. Plasmonic IQ 20 modulators with attojoule per bit electrical energy consumption. Nat. Commun. 10, 1694 (2019). 21

    2019

  118. [120]

    L., et al

    Koeber, S., Palmer, R., Lauermann, M., Heni, W., Elder, D. L., et al. Femtojoule electro-optic 22 modulation using a silicon–organic hybrid device. Light Sci. Appl. 4, e255–e255 (2015). 23

    2015

  119. [121]

    L., Wolf, S., Zwickel, H., et al

    Kieninger, C., Kutuvantavida, Y ., Elder, D. L., Wolf, S., Zwickel, H., et al. Ultra-high electro-24 optic activity demonstrated in a silicon-organic hybrid modulator. Optica 5, 739–748 (2018). 25

    2018

  120. [122]

    C., et a l

    Melikyan, A., Alloatti, L., Muslija, A., Hillerkuss, D., Schindler, P. C., et a l. High-speed 26 Plasmonic Modulators. in Advanced Photonics for Communications IT2A.6 (Optica Publishing 27 Group, 2014); doi:10.1364/IPRSN.2014.IT2A.6. 28

    2014 doi

  121. [123]

    All-plasmonic Mach–29 Zehnder modulator enabling optical high-speed communication at the microscale

    Haffner, C., Heni, W., Fedoryshyn, Y ., Niegemann, J., Melikyan, A., et al. All-plasmonic Mach–29 Zehnder modulator enabling optical high-speed communication at the microscale. Nat. Photonics 30 9, 525–528 (2015). 31

    2015

  122. [125]

    ‐A., Wuethrich, C

    Berseth, C. ‐A., Wuethrich, C. & Reinhart, F. K. The electro‐optic coefficients of GaAs: 35 Measurements at 1.32 and 1.52 μm and study of their dispersion between 0.9 and 10 μm. J. Appl. 36 Phys. 71, 2821–2825 (1992). 37

    1992

  123. [127]

    Low-loss plasmon-41 assisted electro-optic modulator

    Haffner, C., Chelladurai, D., Fedoryshyn, Y ., Josten, A., Baeuerle, B., et al. Low-loss plasmon-41 assisted electro-optic modulator. Nature 556, 483–486 (2018). 42

    2018

  124. [128]

    (CRC Press, 43 2016)

    Introduction to Organic Electronic and Optoelectronic Materials and Devices . (CRC Press, 43 2016). doi:10.1201/9781315374185. 44

    2016 doi

  125. [129]

    & Lončar, M

    Zhang, M., Wang, C., Cheng, R., Shams-Ansari, A. & Lončar, M. Monolithic ultra-high-Q lithium 45 niobate microring resonator. Optica 4, 1536–1537 (2017). 46

    2017

  126. [130]

    N., Alam, A

    Ummethala, S., Kemal, J. N., Alam, A. S., Lauermann, M., Kuzmin, A., et al. Hybrid electro-47 optic modulator combining silicon photonic slot waveguides with high- k radio- frequency 48 slotlines. Optica 8, 511–519 (2021). 49

    2021

  127. [131]

    Recent advances in silicon -50 57 based passive and active optical interconnects

    Subbaraman, H., Xu, X., Hosseini, A., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y ., et al. Recent advances in silicon -50 57 based passive and active optical interconnects. Opt. Express 23, 2487–2511 (2015). 1

    2015

  128. [132]

    Purcell, E. M. Resonance Absorption by Nuclear Magnetic Moments in a Solid. Phys. Rev. 69, 2 37–38 (1946). 3

    1946

  129. [133]

    Yu, J., Yao, W., Qiu, M. & Li, Q. Free -space high-Q nanophotonics. Light Sc i. Appl. 14, 174 4 (2025). 5

    2025

  130. [134]

    & Hecht, B

    Novotny, L. & Hecht, B. Principles of Nano- Optics. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 6 2006). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511813535. 7

    2006 doi

  131. [135]

    M., Hong, J., Miura, H., Kashino, T., et al

    Qiu, F., Spring, A. M., Hong, J., Miura, H., Kashino, T., et al. Electro-optic Polymer Ring 8 Resonator Modulator on a Flat Silicon-on-Insulator. Laser Photonics Rev. 11, 1700061 (2017). 9

    2017

  132. [136]

    Babicheva, V . E. & Evlyukhin, A. B. Mie-resonant metaphotonics. Adv. Opt. Photonics 16, 539–10 658 (2024). 11

    2024

  133. [137]

    V ., Escalé, M

    Weigand, H., V ogler-Neuling, V . V ., Escalé, M. R., Pohl, D., Richter, F. U., et al. Enhanced 12 Electro-Optic Modulation in Resonant Metasurfaces of Lithium Niobate. ACS Photonics 8, 3004–13 3009 (2021). 14

    2021

  134. [138]

    & Shadrivov, I

    Wang, L. & Shadrivov, I. Electro-optic metasurfaces. Opt. Express 30, 35361–35368 (2022). 15

    2022

  135. [139]

    Babicheva, V . E. & Rumi, M. Chalcophosphate metasurfaces with multipolar resonances and 16 electro-optic tuning. RSC Adv. 14, 33906–33918 (2024). 17

    2024

  136. [140]

    C., Falcone, V ., Talts, Ü.- L., Trassin, M., et al

    Prountzou, E., Weigand, H. C., Falcone, V ., Talts, Ü.- L., Trassin, M., et al. Electro-optic 18 Modulation in Polycrystalline Barium Titanate Metasurfaces Enhanced by Poling. ACS Photonics 19 13, 2928–2936 (2026). 20

    2026

  137. [142]

    Zhang, J., Zhang, L. & Xu, W. Surface plasmon polaritons: physics and applications. J. Phys. 24 Appl. Phys. 45, 113001 (2012). 25

    2012

  138. [143]

    M., Silkin, V

    Pitarke, J. M., Silkin, V . M., Chulkov, E. V . & Echenique, P. M. Theory of surface plasmons and 26 surface-plasmon polaritons. Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 1 (2006). 27

    2006

  139. [144]

    A., Fiedler, S., Wolff, C

    Thomaschewski, M., Zenin, V . A., Fiedler, S., Wolff, C. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Plasmonic Lithium 28 Niobate Mach–Zehnder Modulators. Nano Lett. 22, 6471–6475 (2022). 29

    2022

  140. [145]

    & Bozhevolnyi, S

    Thomaschewski, M., Wolff, C. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. High-Speed Plasmonic Electro-Optic Beam 30 Deflectors. Nano Lett. 21, 4051–4056 (2021). 31

    2021

  141. [146]

    I., Heni, W., Blatter, T., et al

    Eppenberger, M., Messner, A., Bitachon, B. I., Heni, W., Blatter, T., et al. Resonant plasmonic 32 micro-racetrack modulators with high bandwidth and high temperature tolerance. Nat. Photonics 33 17, 360–367 (2023). 34

    2023

  142. [147]

    The plasmonic BTO-on-SiN 35 platform – beyond 200 GBd modulation for optical communications

    Kohli, M., Chelladurai, D., Kulmer, L., Blatter, T., Horst, Y ., et al. The plasmonic BTO-on-SiN 35 platform – beyond 200 GBd modulation for optical communications. Light Sci. Appl. 14, 399 36 (2025). 37

    2025

  143. [148]

    & Fendler, J

    Hutter, E. & Fendler, J. H. Exploitation of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance. Adv. Mater. 38 16, 1685–1706 (2004). 39

    2004

  144. [149]

    Macleod, H. A. Thin-film optical filters. (Thin-Film Optical Filters, 1979). 40

    1979

  145. [150]

    & Bozhevolnyi, S

    Damgaard-Carstensen, C., Thomaschewski, M., Ding, F. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Electrical Tuning 41 of Fresnel Lens in Reflection. ACS Photonics 8, 1576–1581 (2021). 42

    2021

  146. [151]

    & Bozhevolnyi, S

    Damgaard-Carstensen, C., Thomaschewski, M. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Electro- optic metasurface-43 based free-space modulators. Nanoscale 14, 11407–11414 (2022). 44

    2022

  147. [153]

    & Zhang, J

    Liu, L., Liu, K., Liu, N., Zhu, Z. & Zhang, J. Fano-Resonant Metasurface with 92% Reflectivity 48 Based on Lithium Niobate on Insulator. Nanomaterials 12, 3849 (2022). 49

    2022

  148. [154]

    L., Christen, I., Minkov, M., Brabec, C

    Panuski, C. L., Christen, I., Minkov, M., Brabec, C. J., Trajtenberg-Mills, S., et al. A full degree-50 58 of-freedom spatiotemporal light modulator. Nat. Photonics 16, 834–842 (2022). 1

    2022

  149. [155]

    & Wang, S

    Magnusson, R. & Wang, S. S. New principle for optical filters. Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1022–1024 2 (1992). 3

    1992

  150. [156]

    Ultrahigh-Q guided mode resonances in an All-4 dielectric metasurface

    Huang, L., Jin, R., Zhou, C., Li, G., Xu, L., et al. Ultrahigh-Q guided mode resonances in an All-4 dielectric metasurface. Nat. Commun. 14, 3433 (2023). 5

    2023

  151. [157]

    Infinite-Q guided modes radiate in the 6 continuum

    Sun, K., Wei, H., Chen, W., Chen, Y ., Cai, Y ., et al. Infinite-Q guided modes radiate in the 6 continuum. Phys. Rev. B 107, 115415 (2023). 7

    2023

  152. [158]

    Guided Mode Resonant Gratings for 8 Broadband Reflection

    Xie, Y ., Chen, C., Wang, J., Zhang, S., Zhang, R., et al. Guided Mode Resonant Gratings for 8 Broadband Reflection. Laser Photonics Rev. 20, e01956 (2026). 9

    2026

  153. [159]

    & Oliner, A

    Hessel, A. & Oliner, A. A. A New Theory of Wood’s Anomalies on Optical Gratings. Appl. Opt. 10 4, 1275–1297 (1965). 11

    1965

  154. [160]

    & Dionne, J

    Barton, D., Lawrence, M. & Dionne, J. Wavefront shaping and modulation with resonant electro-12 optic phase gradient metasurfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 071104 (2021). 13

    2021

  155. [161]

    High-Q magnetic toroidal dipole 14 resonance in all-dielectric metasurfaces

    Zhang, Y ., Wang, L., He, H., Duan, H., Huang, J., et al. High-Q magnetic toroidal dipole 14 resonance in all-dielectric metasurfaces. APL Photonics 9, 076106 (2024). 15

    2024

  156. [162]

    B., Abdollahramezani, S., et al

    Dagli, S., Shim, J., Carr Delgado, H., Balch, H. B., Abdollahramezani, S., et al. GHz-Speed 16 Wavefront Shaping Metasurface Modulators Enabled by Resonant Electro-Optic Nanoantennas. 17 Adv. Mater. n/a, e06790. 18

  157. [163]

    P., et al

    Long, S., Zhang, W., Xue, Z., Xu, G., Shum, P. P., et al. Active Terahertz Nonlocal Metasurfaces 19 With Liquid Crystal Elastomers. Laser Photonics Rev. 19, 2402167 (2025). 20

    2025

  158. [164]

    Pushing Q-factor limit of guided resonances 21 by harnessing topologically protected terahertz bound states in the continuum

    Sun, G., Wang, Y ., Xie, R., Chen, X., Li, Y ., et al. Pushing Q-factor limit of guided resonances 21 by harnessing topologically protected terahertz bound states in the continuum. Appl. Phys. Rev. 22 12, 011422 (2025). 23

    2025

  159. [165]

    & Monticone, F

    Shastri, K. & Monticone, F. Nonlocal flat optics. Nat. Photonics 17, 36–47 (2022). 24

    2022

  160. [166]

    G., Kabashin, A

    Kravets, V . G., Kabashin, A. V., Barnes, W. L. & Grigorenko, A. N. Plasmonic Surface Lattice 25 Resonances: A Review of Properties and Applications. Chem. Rev. 118, 5912–5951 (2018). 26

    2018

  161. [168]

    Tunable lithium niobate metasurfaces 29 for phase-only modulation based on quasi-bound states in the continuum

    Kanyang, R., Fang, C., Wang, Y ., Li, X., Zeng, X., et al. Tunable lithium niobate metasurfaces 29 for phase-only modulation based on quasi-bound states in the continuum. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 67, 30 219401 (2024). 31

    2024

  162. [169]

    & Wang, X

    Shen, X., Tian, H., Li, J., Wu, Y . & Wang, X. Ultra-high Q-factor quasi-BIC BaTiO3 metasurface 32 for electro-optic modulation. Opt. Express 32, 20268 (2024). 33

    2024

  163. [170]

    High-Q miniaturized bound state in the 34 continuum microcavities on thin-film lithium niobate towards efficient spatial light modulation

    Hu, Y ., He, H., Zhang, Z., Liu, Z., Chen, Y ., et al. High-Q miniaturized bound state in the 34 continuum microcavities on thin-film lithium niobate towards efficient spatial light modulation. 35 Opt. Express 33, 9317–9327 (2025). 36

    2025

  164. [171]

    U., Biswas, S

    Li, M., Hail, C. U., Biswas, S. & Atwater, H. A. Excitonic Beam Steering in an Active van der 37 Waals Metasurface. Nano Lett. 23, 2771–2777 (2023). 38

    2023

  165. [172]

    W., et al

    Han, S., Kim, S., Kim, S., Low, T., Brar, V . W., et al. Complete Complex Amplitude Modulation 39 with Electronically Tunable Graphene Plasmonic Metamolecules. ACS Nano 14, 1166–1175 40 (2020). 41

    2020

  166. [173]

    I., Gelly , R

    Andersen, T. I., Gelly , R. J., Scuri, G., Dwyer, B. L., Wild, D. S., et al. Beam steering at the 42 nanosecond time scale with an atomically thin reflector. Nat. Commun. 13, 3431 (2022). 43

    2022

  167. [174]

    G., et al

    van de Groep, J., Song, J.-H., Celano, U., Li, Q., Kik, P. G., et al. Exciton resonance tuning of an 44 atomically thin lens. Nat. Photonics 14, 426–430 (2020). 45

    2020

  168. [175]

    S., Reshef, O., Mamchur, Y ., Alam, M

    Bin-Alam, M. S., Reshef, O., Mamchur, Y ., Alam, M. Z., Carlow, G., et al. Ultra-high-Q 46 resonances in plasmonic metasurfaces. Nat Commun 12, 974 (2021). 47

    2021

  169. [176]

    C., Talts, Ü.-L., Vieli, A.-L., V ogler-Neuling, V

    Weigand, H. C., Talts, Ü.-L., Vieli, A.-L., V ogler-Neuling, V . V ., Nardi, A., et al. Nanoimprinting 48 Solution-Derived Barium Titanate for Electro -Optic Metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 24, 5536–5542 49 (2024). 50 59

    2024

  170. [177]

    Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and Phase Shifts

    Fano, U. Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and Phase Shifts. Phys. Rev. 124, 1 1866–1878 (1961). 2

    1961

  171. [178]

    Miroshnichenko, A. E. Fano resonances in nanoscale structures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2257–2298 3 (2010). 4

    2010

  172. [179]

    Sharma, M., Michaeli, L., Haim, D. B. & Ellenbogen, T. Liquid Crystal Switchable Surface 5 Lattice Resonances in Plasmonic Metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 9, 2702–2712 (2022). 6

    2022

  173. [180]

    van Heijst, E. A. P., ter Huurne, S. E. T., Sol, J. A. H. P., Castellanos, G. W., Ramezani, M., et al. 7 Electric tuning and switching of the resonant response of nanoparticle arrays with liquid crystals. 8 J. Appl. Phys. 131, 083101 (2022). 9

    2022

  174. [181]

    Plasmonic metafibers electro-optic modulators

    Zhang, L., Sun, X., Yu, H., Deng, N., Qiu, F., et al. Plasmonic metafibers electro-optic modulators. 10 Light Sci. Appl. 12, 198 (2023). 11

    2023

  175. [182]

    High-speed metasurface 12 modulator using perfectly absorptive bimodal plasmonic resonance

    Zhang, J., Kosugi, Y ., Ogasawara, M., Ariu, K., Otomo, A., et al. High-speed metasurface 12 modulator using perfectly absorptive bimodal plasmonic resonance. APL Photonics 8, 121304 13 (2023). 14

    2023

  176. [183]

    The electro-optic spatial light modulator of 15 lithium niobate metasurface based on plasmonic quasi-bound states in the continuum

    Ju, Y ., Zhou, H., Huang, Y ., Zhao, Y ., Deng, X., et al. The electro-optic spatial light modulator of 15 lithium niobate metasurface based on plasmonic quasi-bound states in the continuum. Nanoscale 16 15, 13965–13970 (2023). 17

    2023

  177. [184]

    & Peng, S

    Li, M., Zhong, Z., Bai, P. & Peng, S. Phase-Controlled Fano Resonances in Hybrid Metasurfaces. 18 ACS Nano 20, 8406–8414 (2026). 19

    2026

  178. [185]

    V ., Maier, S

    Rahmani, M., Leo, G., Brener, I., Zayats, A. V ., Maier, S. A., et al. Nonlinear frequency 20 conversion in optical nanoantennas and metasurfaces: materials evolution and fabrication. Opto-21 Electron. Adv. 1, 180021 (2018). 22

    2018

  179. [186]

    M., Shalaev, V

    Shaltout, A. M., Shalaev, V . M. & Brongersma, M. L. Spatiotemporal light control with active 23 metasurfaces. Science 364, eaat3100 (2019). 24

    2019

  180. [187]

    R., Barreda, Á., Moreno, F., Litman, A., Geffrin, J.-M., et al

    Abujetas, D. R., Barreda, Á., Moreno, F., Litman, A., Geffrin, J.-M., et al. High-Q Transparency 25 Band in All-Dielectric Metasurfaces Induced by a Quasi Bound State in the Continuum. Laser 26 Photonics Rev. 15, 2000263 (2021). 27

    2021

  181. [188]

    & Kivshar, Y

    Koshelev, K., Lepeshov, S., Liu, M., Bogdanov, A. & Kivshar, Y . Asymmetric metasurfaces with 28 high-Q resonances governed by bound states in the continuum. ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv180900330 29 (2018). 30

    2018

  182. [189]

    Yoon, G., Lee, D., Nam, K. T. & Rho, J. Electrically tunable dielectric metasurfaces via 31 symmetry-broken resonances. Nat. Photonics 15, 497–502 (2021). 32

    2021

  183. [191]

    & Barnes, W

    Auguié, B. & Barnes, W. L. Collective resonances in gold nanoparticle arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 101, 143902 (2008). 36

    2008

  184. [192]

    Humphrey, A. D. & Barnes, W. L. Plasmonic surface lattice resonances on arrays of different 37 lattice symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 90, 075404 (2014). 38

    2014

  185. [193]

    & Wang, S

    Magnusson, R. & Wang, S. New principle for optical filters. Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1022–1024 39 (1992). 40

    1992

  186. [194]

    & others

    Wang, Y . & others. Electrically tunable guided-mode resonance metasurface. Opt. Express 26, 41 15017–15027 (2018). 42

    2018

  187. [195]

    & others

    Zhang, L. & others. Large-aperture guided-mode resonance metasurfaces for wavefront shaping. 43 Photonics Res. 9, 1805–1814 (2021). 44

    2021

  188. [197]

    & others

    Zhu, X. & others. Fabry–Perot cavity enhanced electro -optic modulation. Opt. Express 27, 46 12345–12353 (2019). 47

    2019

  189. [198]

    & others

    Chen, Y . & others. Cavity-enhanced active metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 8, 3086–3093 (2021). 48

    2021

  190. [199]

    & others

    Haffner, C. & others. All -plasmonic Mach –Zehnder modulator enabling optical high- speed 49 communication. Nature 556, 483–486 (2018). 50 60

    2018

  191. [200]

    & others

    Burla, M. & others. Plasmonic modulators for high- speed optical interconnects. Nat. Commun. 1 10, 5345 (2019). 2

    2019

  192. [201]

    & others

    Kinsey, N. & others. Active plasmonic devices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 742–760 (2019). 3

    2019

  193. [202]

    V ., Richter, F

    Karvounis, A., V ogler-Neuling, V . V ., Richter, F. U., Dénervaud, E., Timofeeva, M., et al. Electro-4 Optic Metasurfaces Based on Barium Titanate Nanoparticle Films. Adv. Opt. Mater. 8, 2000623 5 (2020). 6

    2020

  194. [203]

    B., Abdollahramezani, S., et al

    Dagli, S., Shim, J., Carr Delgado, H., Balch, H. B., Abdollahramezani, S., et al. GHz-Speed 7 Wavefront Shaping Metasurface Modulators Enabled by Resonant Electro-Optic Nanoantennas. 8 Adv. Mater. 37, e06790 (2025). 9

    2025

  195. [204]

    & Dionne, J

    Klopfer, E., Dagli, S., Barton, D., Lawrence, M. & Dionne, J. A. High- Quality-Factor Silicon-10 on-Lithium Niobate Metasurfaces for Electro-optically Reconfigurable Wavefront Shaping. Nano 11 Lett. 22, 1703–1709 (2022). 12

    2022

  196. [205]

    & others

    Wu, P.-C. & others. Dynamic beam ste ering with all-dielectric electro-optic metasurfaces. Nat. 13 Commun. 10, 3654 (2019). 14

    2019

  197. [206]

    & others

    Santonocito, S. & others. Large -area reconfigurable electro -optic metasurfaces for wavefront 15 shaping and holography. Nat. Photonics 17, 856–863 (2023). 16

    2023

  198. [207]

    Lithium niobate thin film electro-optic modulator

    Liu, J., Qu, L., Wu, W., Jin, C., Chen, Z., et al. Lithium niobate thin film electro-optic modulator. 17 Nanophotonics 13, 1503–1508 (2024). 18

    2024

  199. [208]

    High-speed optical coherence manipulation based 19 on lithium niobate films modulator

    Zhu, X., Ni, F., Liu, H., Yu, J., Wang, F., et al. High-speed optical coherence manipulation based 19 on lithium niobate films modulator. PhotoniX 6, 17 (2025). 20

    2025

  200. [209]

    & others

    Ding, F. & others. Quasi -bound-state-in-the-continuum enhanced electro -optic metasurface 21 modulation. ACS Photonics 11, 1123–1131 (2024). 22

    2024

  201. [210]

    Electrically Reconfigurable Quasi-BIC Metadevices 23 Enabled by Integrated Barium Titanate

    Xia, J., Liu, J., Liu, Y ., Liu, Z., Wei, X., et al. Electrically Reconfigurable Quasi-BIC Metadevices 23 Enabled by Integrated Barium Titanate. Nanophotonics 15, e70104 (2026). 24

    2026

  202. [211]

    Pixel-scale narrow-linewidth spectral 25 encoding chip for high-performance snapshot spectral imaging

    Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Chao, H., Zhang, Y ., Zhang, L., et al. Pixel-scale narrow-linewidth spectral 25 encoding chip for high-performance snapshot spectral imaging. Optica 13, 867–875 (2026). 26

    2026

  203. [212]

    & Fang, L

    Yao, Z., Liu, S., Wang, Y ., Yuan, X. & Fang, L. Integrated lithium niobate photonics for sub-27 ångström snapshot spectroscopy. Nature 646, 567–575 (2025). 28

    2025

  204. [213]

    & others

    Zheng, X. & others. Electro- optically tunable quasi -BIC metasurface filters. ACS Photonics 9, 29 2451–2459 (2022). 30

    2022

  205. [214]

    Spatially entangled photon 31 pairs from lithium niobate nonlocal metasurfaces

    Zhang, J., Ma, J., Parry, M., Cai, M., Camacho -Morales, R., et al. Spatially entangled photon 31 pairs from lithium niobate nonlocal metasurfaces. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq4240 (2022). 32

    2022

  206. [215]

    & others

    Liu, W. & others. Metasurfaces for quantum photonics. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 57 (2021). 33

    2021

  207. [216]

    Programmable 34 metasurfaces for future photonic artificial intelligence

    Abou-Hamdan, L., Marinov, E., Wiecha, P., del Hougne, P., Wang, T., et al. Programmable 34 metasurfaces for future photonic artificial intelligence. Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 331–347 (2025). 35

    2025

  208. [217]

    & Chen, H

    Qian, C., Kaminer, I. & Chen, H. A guidance to intelligent metamaterials and metamaterials 36 intelligence. Nat. Commun. 16, 1154 (2025). 37

    2025

  209. [218]

    Advances in information processing and 38 biological imaging using flat optics

    Wang, X., Hao, H., He, X., Xie , P., Liu, J., et al. Advances in information processing and 38 biological imaging using flat optics. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. (2024) doi:10.1038/s44287- 024-39 00057-2. 40

    2024 doi

  210. [219]

    & Bhaskaran, H

    Farmakidis, N., Dong, B. & Bhaskaran, H. Integrated photonic neuromorphic computing: 41 opportunities and challenges. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 1, 358–373 (2024). 42

    2024

  211. [220]

    Yang, Y ., Jeon, Y ., Dong, Z., Yang, J. K. W., Haddadi Moghaddam, M., et al. Nanofabrication for 43 Nanophotonics. ACS Nano 19, 12491–12605 (2025). 44

    2025

  212. [221]

    Homogenous and ultra-shallow lithium niobate 45 etching by focused ion beam

    Qu, M., Shen, Y ., Wu, L., Fu, X., Cheng, X., et al. Homogenous and ultra-shallow lithium niobate 45 etching by focused ion beam. Precis. Eng. 62, 10–15 (2020). 46

    2020

  213. [222]

    & Monticone, F

    Overvig, A. & Monticone, F. Nonlocal metasurfaces: universal modal maps governed by a 47 nonlocal generalized Snell’s law. Nanophotonics 14, 3851–3860 (2025). 48

    2025

  214. [223]

    Overvig, A., Mann, S. A. & Alù, A. Spatio- temporal coupled mode theory for nonlocal 49 metasurfaces. Light Sci. Appl. 13, 28 (2024). 50 61

    2024

  215. [224]

    High quality factor resonant metasurface with etchless lithium niobate. Opt. Laser Technol. 161, 1 109163 (2023). 2

    2023

  216. [225]

    Barium titanate poling dynamics 3 in high-speed communications

    Qiu, B., St-Arnault, C., Bernal, S., Zhang, K., Nikic, A., et al. Barium titanate poling dynamics 3 in high-speed communications. Optica 13, 848–857 (2026). 4

    2026

  217. [226]

    W., Thomaschewski, M., Jahelka, P

    Thureja, P., Nyholm, A. W., Thomaschewski, M., Jahelka, P. R., Belle ville, J., et al. Spalled 5 Barium Titanate Single Crystal Thin Films for Functional Device Applications. Nano Lett. 25, 6 11089–11096 (2025). 7

    2025

  218. [227]

    I., Yim, J

    Kim, G. I., Yim, J. & Bahl, G. Low loss monolithic barium titanate on insulator integrated 8 photonics with intrinsic quality factor >1 million. (2025) doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.17150. 9

    2025 doi arXiv

  219. [228]

    & Grange, R

    Karvounis, A. & Grange, R. Electro-mechanical to optical conversion by plasmonic-ferroelectric 10 nanostructures. Nanophotonics 11, 3993–4000 (2022). 11

    2022

  220. [229]

    & Otomo, A

    Tominari, Y ., Yamada, T., Kaji, T., Yamada, C. & Otomo, A. Photostability of organic electro -12 optic polymer under practical high intensity continuous -wave 1550 nm laser irradiation. Jpn. J. 13 Appl. Phys. 60, 101002 (2021). 14

    2021

  221. [230]

    L., Johnson, L

    Xu, H., Elder, D. L., Johnson, L. E., de Coene, Y ., Heni, W., et al. Ultrahigh Performance Cross-15 Linkable Organic Electro-Optic Material for Hybrid Modulators. Chem. Mater. 37, 4301−4313 16 (2025). 17

    2025

  222. [231]

    Wafer-Scale Integration of 18 Lithium Niobate on a Silicon Photonics 200-mm Platform

    Niels, M., Vissers, E., Vanackere, T., Moerman, A., Zheng, X., et al. Wafer-Scale Integration of 18 Lithium Niobate on a Silicon Photonics 200-mm Platform. in 2025 IEEE Photonics Conference 19 (IPC) 1–2 (2025); doi:10.1109/IPC65510.2025.11282050. 20

    2025

  223. [232]

    17-GHz lossless InP -21 membrane active metasurface

    Fukui, T., Sumita, K., Miyano, H., Soma, G., Yanwachirakul, W., et al. 17-GHz lossless InP -21 membrane active metasurface. Sci. Adv. 11, eaea3538 (2025). 22

    2025

  224. [233]

    V olume manufacturing of thin-film lithium 23 niobate modulators with bandwidth > 110 GHz based on 4-inch wafer with a quartz handle

    Liu, Y ., Zhou, Z., Zhou, P., Wang, C., Wang, Q., et al. V olume manufacturing of thin-film lithium 23 niobate modulators with bandwidth > 110 GHz based on 4-inch wafer with a quartz handle. 24 Light Adv. Manuf. 6, 575–581 (2025). 25

    2025

  225. [234]

    Wafer-scale nanofabrication of sub-26 5 nm gaps in plasmonic metasurfaces

    Gour, J., Beer, S., Paul, P., Alberucci, A., Steinert, M., et al. Wafer-scale nanofabrication of sub-26 5 nm gaps in plasmonic metasurfaces. Nanophotonics 13, 4191–4202 (2024). 27

    2024

  226. [235]

    K., Rosas, S., et al

    Beisenova, A., Adi, W., Wu, W., Biswas, S. K., Rosas, S., et al. Wafer-Scale All-Dielectric quasi-28 BIC Metasurfaces: Bridging High- throughput Deep- UV Lithography with Nanophotonic 29 Applications. (2025) doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.15135. 30

    2025 doi

  227. [236]

    & Rho, J

    Kim, J. & Rho, J. Scalable Manufacturing Methods of Large-Area Metasurfaces for Real-World 31 Applications. Acc. Mater. Res. (2026) doi:10.1021/accountsmr.6c00051. 32

    2026 doi

  228. [237]

    300-unit-per-second roll -to-roll 33 manufacturing of visible metalenses

    Hoang, T., Park, Y ., Kim, J., Truong, H., Parajuli, S., et al. 300-unit-per-second roll -to-roll 33 manufacturing of visible metalenses. Nature 652, 1188–1194 (2026). 34

    2026

  229. [238]

    & Iwanaga, M

    Watanabe, K., Nagao, T. & Iwanaga, M. Low -Contrast BIC Metasurfaces with Quality Factors 35 Exceeding 100,000. Nano Lett. 25, 2777–2784 (2025). 36

    2025

  230. [239]

    Artificial intelligence -generated photonics: 37 mapping optical properties to subwavelength structures directly via a diffusion model

    Rao, S., Cui, K., Yang, J., Li, Y ., Wang, S., et al. Artificial intelligence -generated photonics: 37 mapping optical properties to subwavelength structures directly via a diffusion model. Light Adv. 38 Manuf. 7, 1–13 (2026). 39

    2026

  231. [240]

    & Cao, W

    Wei, H., He, X. & Cao, W. Spin-multiplexed metasurface inverse-design based on a bi-directional 40 deep neural network for terahertz wavefront control. Optica 12, 505 (2025). 41

    2025

  232. [241]

    A., et al

    Kühne, J., Wang, J., Weber, T., Kühner, L., Maier, S. A., et al. Fabrication robustness in BIC 42 metasurfaces. Nanophotonics 10, 4305–4312 (2021). 43 44

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.