Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 236 references

The HII Regions' Molecular Law of Star Formation

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The star formation law steepens to slope 1.85 at HII-region scales.

desk verdict A careful 100 pc resolved measurement of the molecular star formation law, but the steep n≈1.85 slope rests on a diffuse-subtraction assumption that the paper does not independently validate. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.00918 v1 pith:DN6HEDZ4 submitted 2026-08-02 astro-ph.GA

Daniela Calzetti , Drew Lapeer , Robert C. Kennicutt , Bruce Elmegreen , Sean T. Linden , Mark R. Krumholz , Angela Adamo , Daniel A. Dale
show 23 more authors
Karin Sandstrom Giacomo Bortolini Michele Cignoni Matteo Correnti Ana Duarte-Cabral Helena Faustino Vieira John S. Gallagher Kathryn Grasha Mark Heyer Leslie K. Hunt Kelsey E. Johnson Ralf S. Klessen Thomas S.-Y. Lai Desika Narayanan Goran Ostlin Alex Pedrini Elena Sabbi John-David T. Smith Linda J. Smith Monica Tosi Varun Bajaj Martha Boyer Tony D. Weinbeck
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords starformationlawHIIregionsmoleculargasJWSTinfrareddustemissiondiffusebackgroundsubtractionstarburstgalaxieshigh-redshift
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper analyzes 353 HII regions of roughly 100 pc size in three nearby galaxies, NGC 628, NGC 5194, and NGC 5236, using HST Hα, JWST 21 µm, and CO maps. It claims that the molecular star formation law at these scales is steep, $\Sigma_{\rm SFR} \propto \Sigma_{\rm mol}^{1.85 \pm 0.12}$, much steeper than the near-linear relation found for kiloparsec-scale galaxy regions and close to the slopes of Milky Way molecular clouds. The steepening comes from subtracting the galaxy's diffuse background light from each region; without that subtraction the slope falls to $1.35 \pm 0.07$. The paper further claims that local HII regions, high-redshift star-forming clumps, and low- and high-redshift starburst galaxies fall on one continuous sequence of star formation across three orders of magnitude in gas surface density. A sympathetic reader would care because a single steep law from 100 pc HII regions to distant starbursts would make HII regions true scaled-down versions of extreme star-forming systems, and would mean that unresolved galaxy measurements that do not remove diffuse light underestimate the steepness of the real star formation law.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the surface-density quantities $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$, from dust-corrected Hα combined with JWST 21 µm emission, and $\Sigma_{\rm mol}$, from CO total-intensity maps converted with a disk-weight-dependent $\alpha_{\rm CO}$. The mechanism that carries the argument is annular background subtraction: for each 60 pc aperture, the diffuse galaxy emission is estimated as the mode of pixel values in a surrounding 60–100 pc annulus after $\sigma$-clipping, and this diffuse component is removed from both the SFR and molecular gas tracers. Removing that component changes the fitted slope from $n \simeq 1.35$ to $n \simeq 1.85$, and the paper argues the diffuse 21 µm light is heat from old stars, not current star formation, because it tracks stellar mass rather than region luminosity. Supporting machinery includes a fixed 60 pc free-fall radius used to derive efficiencies per free-fall time, and a disk-weight-dependent CO-to-H$_2$ conversion that removes galaxy-to-galaxy offsets without steepening the within-galaxy relations.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to measure SFR in the same 353 regions with a tracer that is insensitive to dust heated by old stars—for example, radio free-free emission or a recombination line ratio with a much deeper extinction correction—and to refit $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ versus $\Sigma_{\rm mol}$; if the slope returned to near $n \simeq 1$ instead of $1.85$, the diffuse-light subtraction would be implicated. A second, complementary test would be to run the paper's exact annular-mode background recipe on simulated galaxy images with a known input star formation law and see whether the recovered slope is biased.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a resolved molecular star formation law for HII regions: for the 353 regions above the censoring limits, $\log \Sigma_{\rm SFR} = (1.85 \pm 0.12)\,\log \Sigma_{\rm mol} - (4.27 \pm 0.26)$, with a scatter of 0.18 dex in the LINMIX fit. This is significantly steeper than the $n \sim 0.9$–$1.3$ slopes typical of kiloparsec-scale galaxy regions and is close to the $n \sim 1.6$–$2$ slopes of Milky Way molecular clouds. The relation remains steep at 500 pc scales, with slope $1.88 \pm 0.20$, and the paper interprets the steepness as the signature of current star-forming regions isolated from the diffuse emission of the underlying galaxy. It also finds that the diffuse 21 µm emission correlates with stellar mass surface density rather than with current star formation, and argues that leaving that diffuse component in the photometry flattens the measured slope to $1.35 \pm 0.07$. The paper extends the relation to lower and higher gas surface densities by adding local starbursts and high-redshift clumps, concluding that all these systems form a single star formation sequence over three orders of magnitude in $\Sigma_{\rm mol}$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the diffuse 21 µm and Hα light inside each 60 pc aperture belongs to the galaxy's old stellar population, not to the region's current star formation, and that this diffuse component can be measured as the mode of pixel values in the surrounding 60–100 pc annulus; the paper's own no-subtraction fit gives a shallower slope of $1.35 \pm 0.07$, so if this decomposition is wrong the headline steepening weakens.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the slope is truly $n \simeq 1.85$, the molecular gas depletion time decreases with activity, $\tau_{\rm dep} \propto \Sigma_{\rm SFR}^{-0.5}$ or steeper, meaning that more intensely star-forming regions consume their gas faster.
  • The efficiency per free-fall time stays low on average, about 1%, but increases by roughly a factor of 3.5 from faint to bright regions, so star formation feedback does not need to be finely tuned to hold efficiencies down.
  • Kiloparsec-scale laws with $n \sim 1$ appear to be partly a mixing artifact: if diffuse galaxy light is not removed, the resolved law flattens toward the old galaxy-wide value, so the true small-scale law may be steep everywhere.
  • Local HII regions, high-redshift star-forming clumps, and starbursts join into one sequence over three orders of magnitude in $\Sigma_{\rm mol}$, giving a common calibration for interpreting unresolved high-redshift measurements.
  • Physical star formation models must reproduce both a steep slope and a large scatter at fixed region size; models adding a power-law tail to the gas density probability distribution are the ones the paper identifies as capable of bracketing the data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the authors do not pursue: applying the same annular diffuse-light subtraction to existing kiloparsec-resolution surveys would probably steepen their measured slopes toward $n \sim 1.5$–$1.8$, changing published molecular depletion times.
  • If the steep law is universal, then unresolved high-redshift galaxy stacks that mix diffuse and compact emission may be fitting a flatter effective slope; resolved ALMA-scale observations of individual clumps at $z \sim 2$–$4$ would provide a direct test.
  • The slope could be tracer-dependent: using a high-density gas tracer such as HCN instead of CO might yield a shallower relation, since the paper's $\Sigma_{\rm mol}$ includes lower-density gas that is not directly forming stars.
  • A testable consequence for simulations: the same 60–100 pc annular background recipe applied to mock galaxy images should recover the input star formation law; if it artificially steepens it, the observational slope is partly a measurement effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a new measurement of the resolved molecular star formation law at ~100 pc scales in three nearby galaxies (NGC 628, NGC 5194, NGC 5236), combining HST Hα, JWST MIRI 21 µm and NIRCam imaging, and CO maps. After subtracting a local diffuse background via an annulus-mode estimator, the authors find a logarithmic slope n = 1.85 ± 0.12 between Σ_SFR and Σ_mol for 353 HII regions, consistent across three regression algorithms, and a similar slope (n = 1.88 ± 0.20) at 500 pc scales. They argue that the diffuse 21 µm emission correlates with stellar mass rather than current star formation, and that the steep slope connects local HII regions to starbursts and high-redshift star-forming clumps in a single sequence.

Significance. If the measurement is robust, this paper provides a resolved molecular star formation law at ~100 pc scales that is significantly steeper than the canonical kpc-scale law and closer to Milky Way cloud values, with implications for star formation efficiencies and for the interpretation of high-redshift observations. The authors have been careful in several respects: three independent fitting algorithms agree, the 500 pc re-analysis reproduces the slope, and alternative α_CO prescriptions are tested in Appendix G, showing that the steep slope is not an artifact of the adopted CO-to-H2 conversion. The main caveat is the sensitivity of the headline slope to the diffuse-emission subtraction, which is the central point I raise below.

major comments (1)
  1. [5.2, 3.1] The headline slope n = 1.85 is conditional on the diffuse-emission subtraction: Section 5.2 reports that without subtracting the diffuse component, the LINMIX fit yields n = 1.35 ± 0.07, so the steepening is entirely attributed to the subtraction. The robustness test in Section 3.1 only increases the outer annulus radius by a factor of two, which changes SFRs by ~0.03 dex; this tests the annulus size but does not test whether the annulus mode correctly measures only the underlying galaxy's diffuse emission, as opposed to extended emission from the same star-forming complex. The physical argument in Section 3.2 and Figure 3, that diffuse L(21) correlates with stellar mass, is plausible but model-dependent; any smooth component tracing the disk could correlate with the stellar mass map, including light from young populations outside the central peak. If the annulus subtraction removes 21 µm or Hα from young stars in the region's periphery, faint regions lose a larger fraction of their flux, which would artificially steepen the fitted slope. The 500 pc re-analysis in Appendix F uses the same subtraction procedure, so it does not independently break this degeneracy. I recommend that the authors either (a) add an independent diffuse-subtraction test, such as using a different background estimator or a stellar-population-based model for the diffuse component, or (b) explicitly frame the steep slope as conditional on the subtraction and provide a quantitative estimate of the systematic uncertainty in n from plausible variations in the subtraction approach.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title] The title on the first page reads 'The HII Regions' Molecular Law of Star F ormation' with an erroneous space in 'F ormation'.
  2. [Acknowledgments] In the acknowledgments, 'The dara were obtained' should read 'The data were obtained'.
  3. [Figure 3] The right panel of Figure 3 would benefit from an axis label including units for the diffuse 21 µm surface density; currently only the stellar mass axis has explicit units in the caption.
  4. [Table 3] The reported scatter differs substantially among the three algorithms (0.18 for LINMIX versus 0.30 and 0.27 for the others); a brief explanation of this difference would help readers interpret the reliability of the scatter estimates.
  5. [3.2] In the sentence 'The solid lines in the left panel of Figure 3 show the possible range of ratios permitted by a range of star formation histories using the models in Calzetti et al. (2025, briefly described in Appendix B)', the phrasing could be clarified to indicate that these lines are model predictions rather than fits to the data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the slope is an observed regression; self-cited SFR calibration and diffuse-subtraction choices are not fitted to force the result.

full rationale

The central claim (Table 3: Log(Sigma_SFR)=1.85 Log(Sigma_mol)-4.27) is an observed regression between two independently measured surface densities: Sigma_SFR from Halpha+21um photometry and Sigma_mol from CO maps. The SFR calibration is adopted from the authors' prior work (Section 4.1: 'We adopt the calibration by Calzetti et al. (2025) for this work: SFR(Halpha+21)=5.45e-42[L(Halpha)+(0.077+/-0.022)L(21)]'), but it is not fitted to the present data and does not force the slope; the paper shows that replacing 0.077 with the Belfiore et al. (2023) value 0.031 changes the slope by only 25% of the diffuse-subtraction effect. The diffuse-subtraction choice is openly tested: Section 5.2 reports a no-subtraction slope of 1.35+/-0.07, and the steep slope is recovered at 500 pc (Appendix F) and with constant alpha_CO within individual galaxies (Appendix G). The only passage explicitly invoking circularity is Section 5.3, where the authors reject using the Wong et al. (2019) radius-linewidth relation to derive tau_ff because R~Sigma_mol^0.9 would nearly cancel the tau_ff dependence; they instead adopt a fixed 60 pc radius. The epsilon_ff and tau_dep analysis additionally uses forward modeling to account for covariance, and the high-z/starburst comparison is a comparison, not a derivation. The completeness estimate in Section 3.1 uses the derived steep trend, but it is a post-hoc consistency check and does not feed back into the fit. The self-citations (Calzetti et al. 2024, 2025) supply the calibration and photometric method, not the fitted slope, so they are not load-bearing. Score 2 reflects this minor reliance on prior self-cited calibration, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurement (slope n=1.85) has no free parameters fitted to its own data in the sense of a parameterized model, but it depends on several adopted constants and processing choices: the Halpha+21micron SFR calibration from the authors' prior work, the Bolatto et al. (2013) alpha_CO prescription, the annular background subtraction, and the censoring limits. These are mostly transparent and tested, but they are inputs that could shift the result.

free parameters (4)
  • SFR calibration coefficient c21 (HII regions) = 0.077 +/- 0.022
    Adopted from Calzetti et al. (2025); not fitted here, but chosen per scale. A value of 0.031 is used for 500 pc regions (from Belfiore et al. 2023).
  • CO-to-H2 conversion normalization and exponent = 2.9, gamma=0.5
    Adopted from Bolatto et al. (2013). The combined-sample slope depends on this choice; with constant alpha_CO=4.35, the global slope flattens to ~1.3 (Appendix G).
  • Fit censoring limits = Log(Sigma_SFR) > -1.8, Log(Sigma_mol) > 0.5
    Hand-selected to exclude low-S/N data; 34 of 387 points excluded. The SFR limit dominates. These choices affect the fit but are tested.
  • Aperture radius for physical quantities = 60 pc (120 pc diameter)
    Fixed to CO resolution; used for Sigma_SFR, Sigma_mol, and tau_ff. The 500 pc test reproduces the slope.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The SFR calibration SFR(Halpha+21micron) = 5.45e-42 [L(Halpha) + (0.077 +/- 0.022) L(21)] (Calzetti et al. 2025) applies to all HII regions at 60 pc radius.
    The coefficient 0.077 is taken from prior work by the same group; it depends on the assumed star formation history and can vary by up to a factor 4 (Section 4.1). A different coefficient would shift the intercept but not the slope.
  • domain assumption The annular background subtraction (mode of pixels in 60-100 pc annulus after sigma-clipping) isolates the HII region emission from the galaxy's diffuse light in Halpha, Paalpha, and 21 micron.
    The headline slope steepens from 1.35 to 1.85 after this subtraction (Section 5.2). The paper argues the diffuse 21 micron correlates with stellar mass, not current SFR, but the decomposition is model-dependent.
  • domain assumption The CO-to-H2 conversion factor of Bolatto et al. (2013), alpha_CO = 2.9 exp(0.4Z) (Sigma_tot/100)^-gamma with gamma=0.5 for Sigma_tot>100 M_sun pc^-2, applies at 120 pc scales.
    Derived for kpc-scale regions and starbursts; the paper assumes it extends to 60 pc radius HII regions (Section 4.2). Appendix G shows the combined-sample slope flattens to 1.3 with a constant alpha_CO, so this choice affects the headline number.
  • domain assumption The CO(2-1) to CO(1-0) ratio is fixed at R21/10 = 0.65 for all regions.
    This ratio has ~50% region-to-region variations; the paper argues spiral-arm regions have fairly uniform values, but a different ratio would shift Sigma_mol by a constant (Section 2).
  • domain assumption The free-fall time is calculated for a spherical region of radius R = 60 pc, equal to the photometric aperture, for all regions.
    Used for epsilon_ff and tau_dep. The paper notes this is an average and that the true cloud radii are 20-100 pc from the Larson relation, introducing systematic uncertainty (Section 5.3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The HII Regions' Molecular Law of Star Formation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DN6HEDZ4

@misc{pith2026260800918,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The HII Regions' Molecular Law of Star Formation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DN6HEDZ4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00918}
}
read the original abstract

We combine imaging data from the HST, JWST, and ground-based millimeter facilities to investigate the correlation between star formation rate (SFR) and molecular gas at the ~100 pc scale of HII regions in three nearby galaxies: NGC628, NGC5194 and NGC5236. The JWST 21 micron maps of the three galaxies offer a unique insight into the dust-absorbed SFR at high resolution. We find that the relation between the surface densities of SFR and molecular gas has a slope of ~1.85, in log-log scale, significantly steeper than previous results for nearby galaxies but closer to the trends found for molecular clouds in the Milky Way. The steep relation also holds on larger, ~500 pc, scales, and results from the high-resolution imaging that cleanly isolates the star-forming region emission from the underlying galaxy's diffuse contribution. The diffuse emission at 21 micron is, in fact, found to correlate with the galaxy's stellar mass. Comparisons with physical models of star formation are inconclusive; they overlap with the locus of the 100 pc data, but have difficulties in reproducing the data scatter. Possible exceptions are models that add a power law tail to the gas density probability distribution, due to the large range of free parameters allowed. We find that local HII regions, high redshift star-forming clumps, and low and high redshift starburst galaxies form a single sequence of star formation over three orders of magnitude in gas surface density.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00918 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Left): The stellar continuum–subtracted HST/WFC3/Hα image of NGC 5236, showing the footprint of the JWST/MIRI/21 µm image (cyan rectangle) with the 56 selected regions (red circles). The circles have the same radius as those used for the photometric measurements (2. ′′6). North is up, East is left. (Right): A detail of NGC 5236, shown in the four bands used in this work (clockwise from top-left): CO(2–1), MIRI/21 µ… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Composites of common FoVs in CO (blue), Hα (green), 21 µm (red) for the three galaxies: NGC 628, NGC 5194=M 51a and NGC 5236=M 83, with the selected star forming regions shown as red circles. The NE direction is indicated in each panel. the Hα mosaic is sufficiently small ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Left): The ratio of diffuse–to–HII region emission at 21 µm for the star–forming regions in the three galaxies, shown in different color symbols for the different galaxies (teal=NGC 628; magenta=NGC 5194; dark red=NGC 5236). The stochastic sampling limit (Stochastic limit in the figure) is marked as a vertical dotted black line. The solid black lines mark the trends expected by models, in the case of (lower line) c… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Left): The 21 µm/Hα SFR ratio as a function of the SFR(21+Hα) surface density for the star forming regions in the three galaxies (teal=NGC 628, magenta=NGC 5194, dark red=NGC 5236) with 1σ uncertainties. The stochastic sampling limit in ΣSF R is marked with a dashed v…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Left): The SFR surface density as a function of the molecular gas surface density for the 353 regions in our sample (black circles with 1σ uncertainties) together with the best fit through the data returned by the LINMIX algorithm (blue lines with shaded area showing …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The efficiency per free–fall time, ϵff , for the regions in our sample as a function of: ΣSF R (top–left); Σmol (top–right); the gas velocity dispersion σv (bottom–left); and the gas peak temperature Tpeak (bottom–right). The areas excluded by the limits Log(ΣSF R)≥ −1…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The molecular gas depletion timescale, τdep, for the regions in our sample as a function of: ΣSF R (left) and Σmol (right). The areas excluded by the limits Log(ΣSF R)≥ −1.8 and Log(Σmol)≥0.5 are marked as black lines with grey shaded regions. For the τdep–versus–ΣSF R…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Left): The distribution of dispersion velocities for the HII regions with Σmol ≥10 M⊙ pc−2 in the three galaxies, with the best fit shown together with its scatter (blue line and blue shaded region). The values of the best fit slope and scatter are given in the panel.…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The effects of age variations, between 1 Myr and 6 Myr (vertical dark–red bars), on ΣSF R for our regions, shown as a function of ΣSF R for the same bins as the left–hand–side Figure; the vertical bars are centered on the mean ΣSF R–Σmol relation (blue line). The varia…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (Left): The molecular SF law of the local HII regions in comparison with that of local infrared–bright starbursts (U/LIRGs, magenta squares, Kennicutt & De Los Reyes 2021) and ∼400–500 pc regions in a few local U/LIRGs (dark–red triangles, Wilson et al. 2019). The blu…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (Left): The SFR surface density as a function of the molecular gas surface density for our star forming regions (black circles with 1σ uncertainties), compared with models. ‘Local’, multi–freefall models shown include: the central ridge of the multi–freefall model by …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The SFR surface density as a function of the molecular gas surface density per free–fall time for our star forming regions (black circles with 1σ uncertainties) is compared with additional models from the literature. By construction, the models shown in both panels ha…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The ratio of diffuse–to–HII region Hα emission for the sources in our sample, shown in different color symbols for the different galaxies (teal=NGC 628; magenta=NGC 5194; dark red=NGC 5236). Both the diffuse and HII region Hα have been corrected for dust attenuation, …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: (Left:) V–I color versus 3 µm luminosity–to–mass ratio for population models with the following star formation histories: constant star formation (blue curves), exponentially decreasing star formation with 4.3 Gyr e–folding time (black curves) and instantaneous burst …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The scatter plot (Left) and histogram (Right) of the residuals about the best fit line obtained with the LINMIX algorithm (Kelly 2007) for the ΣSF R–Σmol data in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (Left): Histograms of the recovered slopes (Exp+Scatt) from mock catalogs of Log(ϵff ) as a function of Log(ΣSF R) (blue) and Log(Σmol) (dark–red) with intrinsic slopes indicated by the downward arrows (Exp) for 1,000 realizations of ∼400 data each. The blue and dark–…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: (Left:) The SFR surface density as a function of the molecular gas surface density for the 353 regions in our sample using the αCO formulation of Chiang et al. (2024). The data for the three galaxies are shown as color circles with 1σ uncertainties: teal for NGC 628, …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

236 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2025, A&A, 702, A206, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556140

    Accard, C., B´ ethermin, M., Boquien, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A206, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556140

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556140 2025

  2. [2]

    2012, ApJ, 756, 4, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/4

    Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Allafort, A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 4, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/4

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/756/1/4 2012

  3. [3]

    G., & Bershady, M

    Akritas, M. G., & Bershady, M. A. 1996, ApJ, 470, 706, doi: 10.1086/177901 Andr´ e, P., Men’shchikov, A., Bontemps, S., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014666

    doi:10.1086/177901 1996

  4. [4]

    2013, A&A, 549, A135, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220658

    Lombardi, M. 2013, A&A, 549, A135, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220658

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220658 2013

  5. [5]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed

    Vazquez-Semadeni, E. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 63, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0603357

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0603357 2007

  7. [8]

    2024, MNRAS, 534, 1043, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2036

    Ballesteros-Paredes, J., Zamora-Avil´ es, M., Rom´ an-Z´ u˜ niga, C., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 1043, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2036

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2036 2024

  8. [9]

    K., Williams, T

    Belfiore, F., Leroy, A. K., Williams, T. G., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A129, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347175

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347175 2023

Show all 236 references
  1. [10]

    Bending, T. J. R., Dobbs, C. L., & Bate, M. R. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 1672, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1293

    2020 doi

  2. [11]

    2008, AJ, 136, 2846, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2846

    Bigiel, F., Leroy, A., Walter, F., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2846, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2846

    2008 doi

  3. [12]

    K., Walter, F., et al

    Bigiel, F., Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., et al. 2011, ApJL, 730, L13, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/730/2/L13

    2011 doi

  4. [13]

    P., Chandar, R., Dopita, M

    Blair, W. P., Chandar, R., Dopita, M. A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 55, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/55

    2014 doi

  5. [14]

    C., Savage, B

    Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 132, doi: 10.1086/156357

    1978 doi

  6. [15]

    D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A

    Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A. K. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 207, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944

    2013 doi

  7. [16]

    2014, A&A, 571, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424441

    Boquien, M., Buat, V., & Perret, V. 2014, A&A, 571, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424441

    2014 doi

  8. [17]

    2016, A&A, 591, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527759

    Boquien, M., Kennicutt, R., Calzetti, D., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527759

    2016 doi

  9. [18]

    A., et al

    Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R.-P., Urbaneja, M. A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 64, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/64

    2016 doi

  10. [19]

    1996, A&A, 306, 61

    Buat, V., & Xu, C. 1996, A&A, 306, 61

    1996

  11. [20]

    2018, ApJ, 863, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad002

    Burkhart, B. 2018, ApJ, 863, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad002

    2018 doi

  12. [21]

    2019, ApJ, 879, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab25ed

    Burkhart, B., & Mocz, P. 2019, ApJ, 879, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab25ed

    2019 doi

  13. [22]

    2022, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7487203

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2022, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7487203

    2022 doi

  14. [23]

    D., Calzetti, D., Draine, B

    Calapa, M. D., Calzetti, D., Draine, B. T., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 130, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/2/130

    2014 doi

  15. [24]

    2013, Star Formation Rate Indicators, ed

    Calzetti, D. 2013, Star Formation Rate Indicators, ed. J. Falc´ on-Barroso & J. H. Knapen, 419

    2013

  16. [25]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  17. [26]

    2012, ApJ, 752, 98, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/98 The HII-Regions’ Molecular Law of Star Formation39

    Calzetti, D., Liu, G., & Koda, J. 2012, ApJ, 752, 98, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/98 The HII-Regions’ Molecular Law of Star Formation39

    2012 doi

  18. [27]

    C., Bianchi, L., et al

    Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., Bianchi, L., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 871, doi: 10.1086/466518

    2005 doi

  19. [28]

    C., Engelbracht, C

    Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, R. C., Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, 870, doi: 10.1086/520082

    2007 doi

  20. [29]

    J., Shivaei, I., et al

    Calzetti, D., Battisti, A. J., Shivaei, I., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf118

    2021 doi

  21. [30]

    T., et al

    Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., Linden, S. T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad53c0

    2024 doi

  22. [31]

    C., Adamo, A., et al

    Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, R. C., Adamo, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 198, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfbe0

    2025 doi

  23. [32]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900 Cervi˜ no, M., Valls-Gabaud, D., Luridiana, V., &

    1989 doi

  24. [33]

    Mas-Hesse, J. M. 2002, A&A, 381, 51, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011266

    2002 doi

  25. [34]

    Chevance, M., Kruijssen, J. M. D., Krumholz, M. R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 272, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2938

    2022 doi

  26. [35]

    M., Chastenet, J., et al

    Chiang, I.-D., Sandstrom, K. M., Chastenet, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad23ed

    2024 doi

  27. [36]

    E., Schinnerer, E., et al

    Colombo, D., Meidt, S. E., Schinnerer, E., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 4, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/4

    2014 doi

  28. [37]

    2025, A&A, 700, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555408

    Corbelli, E., Elmegreen, B., Ellison, S., & Bianchi, S. 2025, A&A, 700, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555408

    2025 doi

  29. [38]

    P., Turner, J

    Crosthwaite, L. P., Turner, J. L., Buchholz, L., Ho, P. T. P., & Martin, R. N. 2002, AJ, 123, 1892, doi: 10.1086/339479 Da Rio, N., Gouliermis, D. A., & Gennaro, M. 2010, ApJ, 723, 166, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/166

    2002 doi

  30. [39]

    2010, ApJL, 714, L118, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/714/1/L118

    Daddi, E., Elbaz, D., Walter, F., et al. 2010, ApJL, 714, L118, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/714/1/L118

    2010 doi

  31. [40]

    A., Boquien, M., Turner, J

    Dale, D. A., Boquien, M., Turner, J. A., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 260, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/accffe

    2023 doi

  32. [42]

    2025, A&A, 693, A17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451832

    Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451832

    2025 doi

  33. [43]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 6222, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad113

    Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Richard, J., Combes, F., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 6222, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad113

    2023 doi

  34. [44]

    2011, ApJL, 737, L20, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/737/1/L20 —

    Dib, S. 2011, ApJL, 737, L20, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/737/1/L20 —. 2023, ApJ, 959, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09bc

    2011 doi

  35. [45]

    2017, MNRAS, 469, 1521, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx934

    Dib, S., Hony, S., & Blanc, G. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 1521, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx934

    2017 doi

  36. [47]

    2020, A&A, 642, A177, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038849

    Dib, S., Bontemps, S., Schneider, N., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A177, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038849

    2020 doi

  37. [49]

    A., Groves, B

    Dopita, M. A., Groves, B. A., Sutherland, R. S., & Kewley, L. J. 2003, ApJ, 583, 727, doi: 10.1086/345448

    2003 doi

  38. [50]

    A., Blair, W

    Dopita, M. A., Blair, W. P., Long, K. S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 710, 964, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/2/964

    2010 doi

  39. [51]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, ApJ, 732, 100, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/732/2/100

    2011 doi

  40. [52]

    T., & Li, A

    Draine, B. T., & Li, A. 2007, ApJ, 657, 810, doi: 10.1086/511055

    2007 doi

  41. [53]

    T., Li, A., Hensley, B

    Draine, B. T., Li, A., Hensley, B. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abff51

    2021 doi

  42. [54]

    T., Dale, D

    Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., Bendo, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 866, doi: 10.1086/518306

    2007 doi

  43. [55]

    S., et al

    Duarte-Cabral, A., Colombo, D., Urquhart, J. S., et al. 2021, The SEDIGISM survey: molecular clouds in the inner Galaxy, OUP, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2480

    2021 doi

  44. [56]

    2004, PASJ, 56, L45, doi: 10.1093/pasj/56.6.L45

    Egusa, F., Sofue, Y., & Nakanishi, H. 2004, PASJ, 56, L45, doi: 10.1093/pasj/56.6.L45

    2004 doi

  45. [57]

    J., Soler, J

    Elia, D., Evans, II, N. J., Soler, J. D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 216, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adaeb2

    2025 doi

  46. [58]

    Elmegreen, B. G. 1994, ApJL, 425, L73, doi: 10.1086/187313

    1994 doi

  47. [59]

    Elmegreen, B. G. 1997, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, Vol. 6, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, ed. J. Franco, R. Terlevich, & A. Serrano, 165 —. 2002, ApJ, 577, 206, doi: 10.1086/342177 —. 2015, ApJL, 814, L30,...

    1997 doi

  48. [60]

    G., & Lada, C

    Elmegreen, B. G., & Lada, C. J. 1977, ApJ, 214, 725, doi: 10.1086/155302

    1977 doi

  49. [61]

    G., Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., et al

    Elmegreen, B. G., Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adcee6

    2025 doi

  50. [62]

    J., Heiderman, A., & Vutisalchavakul, N

    Evans, II, N. J., Heiderman, A., & Vutisalchavakul, N. 2014, ApJ, 782, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/114

    2014 doi

  51. [63]

    J., Dunham, M

    Evans, II, N. J., Dunham, M. M., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2009, ApJS, 181, 321, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/321 Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., Quataert, E., & Hopkins, P. F. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 1970, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt866

    2009 doi

  52. [64]

    2015, MNRAS, 450, 4035, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv941

    Federrath, C. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 4035, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv941

    2015 doi

  53. [65]

    Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S. 2012, ApJ, 761, 156, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/156

    2012 doi

  54. [66]

    Feldmann, R., & Gnedin, N. Y. 2011, ApJL, 727, L12, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/727/1/L12 40Calzetti et al

    2011 doi

  55. [67]

    Y., & Kravtsov, A

    Feldmann, R., Gnedin, N. Y., & Kravtsov, A. V. 2011, ApJ, 732, 115, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/732/2/115

    2011 doi

  56. [68]

    Hunter, D. A. 1996, AJ, 111, 2265, doi: 10.1086/117961

    1996 doi

  57. [69]

    L., & Krumholz, M

    Fumagalli, M., da Silva, R. L., & Krumholz, M. R. 2011, ApJL, 741, L26, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/741/2/L26 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    2011 doi

  58. [70]

    Galliano, F., Galametz, M., & Jones, A. P. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 673, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051900

    2018 doi

  59. [71]

    Gao, Y., & Solomon, P. M. 2004, ApJ, 606, 271, doi: 10.1086/382999

    2004 doi

  60. [72]

    J., Gracia-Carpio, J., et al

    Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., Gracia-Carpio, J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 2091, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16969.x

    2010

  61. [73]

    J., Lutz, D., et al

    Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., Lutz, D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 20, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/20

    2015 doi

  62. [74]

    2000, A&AS, 141, 371, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000126 G´ omez, G

    Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., & Chiosi, C. 2000, A&AS, 141, 371, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000126 G´ omez, G. C., & V´ azquez-Semadeni, E. 2014, ApJ, 791, 124, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/124

    2000 doi

  63. [75]

    2012, The DrizzlePac Handbook

    Gonzaga, S., Hack, W., Fruchter, A., & Mack, J. 2012, The DrizzlePac Handbook

    2012

  64. [76]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Decleir, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59

    2023 doi

  65. [77]

    2016, Astronomy and Computing, 16, 41, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2016.04.001

    Greenfield, P., & Miller, T. 2016, Astronomy and Computing, 16, 41, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2016.04.001

    2016 doi

  66. [78]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad54b4 —

    Gregg, B., Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad54b4 —. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.06481. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06481

    2024

  67. [79]

    Read, J. I. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 1093, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3133 Grudi´ c, M. Y., Guszejnov, D., Offner, S. S. R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 216, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac526 Grudi´ c, M. Y., Hopkins, P. F., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 3511, doi: 10.1093/mnra...

    2017 doi

  68. [80]

    A., Pipher, J

    Gutermuth, R. A., Pipher, J. L., Megeath, S. T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 739, 84, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/84

    2011 doi

  69. [81]

    C., Kim, C.-G., et al

    Hassan, S., Ostriker, E. C., Kim, C.-G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad73a4

    2024 doi

  70. [82]

    A., et al

    He, Q.-R., Kim, W.-J., Fuller, G. A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.13616, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.13616

    2026 doi

  71. [83]

    2010, ApJ, 723, 1019, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/723/2/1019

    Heyer, M. 2010, ApJ, 723, 1019, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/723/2/1019

    2010 doi

  72. [84]

    2011, ApJL, 743, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/743/2/L29 —

    Hennebelle, P., & Chabrier, G. 2011, ApJL, 743, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/743/2/L29 —. 2013, ApJ, 770, 150, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/150

    2011 doi

  73. [85]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2397

    Hernandez, S., Larsen, S., Trager, S., Kaper, L., & Groot, P. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2397

    2018 doi

  74. [86]

    S., et al

    Heyer, M., Gutermuth, R., Urquhart, J. S., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527681

    2016 doi

  75. [87]

    Heyer, M., Krawczyk, C., Duval, J., & Jackson, J. M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1092, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1092

    2009 doi

  76. [88]

    2022, ApJ, 930, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac67ea

    Heyer, M., Gregg, B., Calzetti, D., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac67ea

    2022 doi

  77. [89]

    H., Carpenter, J

    Heyer, M. H., Carpenter, J. M., & Snell, R. L. 2001, ApJ, 551, 852, doi: 10.1086/320218

    2001 doi

  78. [90]

    A., Riechers, D., Decarli, R., et al

    Hodge, J. A., Riechers, D., Decarli, R., et al. 2015, ApJL, 798, L18, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/798/1/L18

    2015 doi

  79. [91]

    A., Galliano, F., et al

    Hony, S., Gouliermis, D. A., Galliano, F., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1847, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv107

    2015 doi

  80. [92]

    G., & Walterbos, R

    Hoopes, C. G., & Walterbos, R. A. M. 2003, ApJ, 586, 902, doi: 10.1086/367954

    2003 doi

  81. [93]

    G., Walterbos, R

    Hoopes, C. G., Walterbos, R. A. M., & Greenwalt, B. E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1429, doi: 10.1086/118111

    1996 doi

  82. [94]

    F., Kereˇ s, D., O˜ norbe, J., et al

    Hopkins, P. F., Kereˇ s, D., O˜ norbe, J., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 581, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1738

    2014 doi

  83. [96]

    W., Lu, J

    Hosek, Jr., M. W., Lu, J. R., Anderson, J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 870, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaef90

    2019 doi

  84. [97]

    R., Pokhrel, R., & Gutermuth, R

    Hu, Z., Krumholz, M. R., Pokhrel, R., & Gutermuth, R. A. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 1431, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac174

    2022 doi

  85. [98]

    K., Hirashita, H., & Kamaya, H

    Inoue, A. K., Hirashita, H., & Kamaya, H. 2001, ApJ, 555, 613, doi: 10.1086/321499

    2001 doi

  86. [99]

    Israel, F. P. 2020, A&A, 635, A131, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834198

    2020 doi

  87. [100]

    A., & Mandel, E

    Joye, W. A., & Mandel, E. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 295, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII, ed. H. E

    2003

  88. [101]

    2009, A&A, 508, L35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913605

    Kainulainen, J., Beuther, H., Henning, T., & Plume, R. 2009, A&A, 508, L35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913605

    2009 doi

  89. [102]

    Kelly, B. C. 2007, ApJ, 665, 1489, doi: 10.1086/519947

    2007 doi

  90. [103]

    C., & Evans, N

    Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610

    2012 doi

  91. [104]

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 1988, ApJ, 334, 144, doi: 10.1086/166825 —. 1989, ApJ, 344, 685, doi: 10.1086/167834 —. 1998a, ApJ, 498, 541, doi: 10.1086/305588 The HII-Regions’ Molecular Law of Star Formation41 —. 1998b, ARA&A, 36, 189, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189

    1988 doi

  92. [105]

    C., & De Los Reyes, M

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., & De Los Reyes, M. A. C. 2021, ApJ, 908, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd3a2

    2021 doi

  93. [106]

    C., Lee, J

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., Lee, J. C., Funes, J. G., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 247, doi: 10.1086/590058

    2008 doi

  94. [107]

    C., Calzetti, D., Walter, F., et al

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., Calzetti, D., Walter, F., et al. 2007, ApJ, 671, 333, doi: 10.1086/522300

    2007 doi

  95. [108]

    D., Murray, N., et al

    Khullar, S., Matzner, C. D., Murray, N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6311

    2024 doi

  96. [109]

    Kim, C.-G., Kim, W.-T., & Ostriker, E. C. 2011, ApJ, 743, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/743/1/25

    2011 doi

  97. [110]

    Kim, J., Chevance, M., Kruijssen, J. M. D., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 3006, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2339

    2022 doi

  98. [111]

    Kim, J.-G., Kim, W.-T., & Ostriker, E. C. 2018, ApJ, 859, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe27

    2018 doi

  99. [112]

    Kim, W.-T., & Ostriker, E. C. 2007, ApJ, 660, 1232, doi: 10.1086/513176

    2007 doi

  100. [113]

    S., & Glover, S

    Klessen, R. S., & Glover, S. C. O. 2016, Saas-Fee Advanced Course, 43, 85, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-47890-5 2

    2016 doi

  101. [114]

    2025, ApJ, 993, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae018c

    Knutas, A., Adamo, A., Pedrini, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae018c

    2025 doi

  102. [115]

    2025, ApJ, 986, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add1dc

    Koda, J., Egusa, F., Hirota, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add1dc

    2025 doi

  103. [116]

    2012, ApJ, 761, 41, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/41

    Koda, J., Scoville, N., Hasegawa, T., et al. 2012, ApJ, 761, 41, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/41

    2012 doi

  104. [117]

    2020, ApJL, 890, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab70b7

    Koda, J., Sawada, T., Sakamoto, K., et al. 2020, ApJL, 890, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab70b7

    2020 doi

  105. [118]

    Kreckel, K., Faesi, C., Kruijssen, J. M. D., et al. 2018, ApJL, 863, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aad77d

    2018 doi

  106. [119]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    2001

  107. [120]

    Kruijssen, J. M. D., & Longmore, S. N. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 3239, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu098

    2014 doi

  108. [121]

    Kruijssen, J. M. D., Schruba, A., Chevance, M., et al. 2019, Nature, 569, 519, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1194-3

    2019 doi

  109. [122]

    R., Burkhart, B., Forbes, J

    Krumholz, M. R., Burkhart, B., Forbes, J. C., & Crocker, R. M. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 2716, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty852

    2018 doi

  110. [123]

    R., Dekel, A., & McKee, C

    Krumholz, M. R., Dekel, A., & McKee, C. F. 2012, ApJ, 745, 69, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/69

    2012 doi

  111. [124]

    R., & Matzner, C

    Krumholz, M. R., & Matzner, C. D. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1352, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1352

    2009 doi

  112. [125]

    R., & McKee, C

    Krumholz, M. R., & McKee, C. F. 2005, ApJ, 630, 250, doi: 10.1086/431734 —. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 624, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa659

    2005 doi

  113. [126]

    R., McKee, C

    Krumholz, M. R., McKee, C. F., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 227, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430

    2019 doi

  114. [127]

    2012, ApJL, 750, L44, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/750/2/L44

    Kudryavtseva, N., Brandner, W., Gennaro, M., et al. 2012, ApJL, 750, L44, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/750/2/L44

    2012 doi

  115. [128]

    J., & James, B

    Kumari, N., Irwin, M. J., & James, B. L. 2020, A&A, 634, A24, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732467

    2020 doi

  116. [129]

    Lada, C. J. 1987, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 115, Star Forming Regions, ed. M. Peimbert & J. Jugaku, 1

    1987

  117. [130]

    J., Lewis, J

    Lada, C. J., Lewis, J. A., Lombardi, M., & Alves, J. 2017, A&A, 606, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731221

    2017 doi

  118. [131]

    J., Lombardi, M., Roman-Zuniga, C., Forbrich, J., & Alves, J

    Lada, C. J., Lombardi, M., Roman-Zuniga, C., Forbrich, J., & Alves, J. F. 2013, ApJ, 778, 133, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/133

    2013 doi

  119. [132]

    Larson, R. B. 1981, MNRAS, 194, 809, doi: 10.1093/mnras/194.4.809

    1981 doi

  120. [133]

    J., Miville-Deschˆ enes, M.-A., & Murray, N

    Lee, E. J., Miville-Deschˆ enes, M.-A., & Murray, N. W. 2016, ApJ, 833, 229, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/229

    2016 doi

  121. [134]

    D., et al

    Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3, doi: 10.1086/313233

    1999 doi

  122. [135]

    K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2782, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782

    2008 doi

  123. [136]

    K., Walter, F., Sandstrom, K., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Sandstrom, K., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 19, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/19

    2013 doi

  124. [137]

    K., Hughes, A., Schruba, A., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Hughes, A., Schruba, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 16, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/16

    2016 doi

  125. [138]

    K., Schinnerer, E., Hughes, A., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Schinnerer, E., Hughes, A., et al. 2021a, ApJS, 257, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac17f3

    doi

  126. [139]

    K., Hughes, A., Liu, D., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Hughes, A., Liu, D., et al. 2021b, ApJS, 255, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abec80

    doi

  127. [140]

    K., Sandstrom, K., Rosolowsky, E., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Sandstrom, K., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acaf85

    2023 doi

  128. [141]

    K., Sun, J., Meidt, S., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Sun, J., Meidt, S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbcab

    2025 doi

  129. [142]

    C., Bolatto, A

    Levy, R. C., Bolatto, A. D., S´ anchez, S. F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2ed4

    2019 doi

  130. [143]

    S., Leurini, S., et al

    Li, G.-X., Urquhart, J. S., Leurini, S., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527468

    2016 doi

  131. [144]

    Li, Y., Mac Low, M.-M., & Klessen, R. S. 2006, ApJ, 639, 879, doi: 10.1086/499350

    2006 doi

  132. [145]

    F., Calzetti, D., et al

    Li, Y., Crocker, A. F., Calzetti, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, 180, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/180

    2013 doi

  133. [146]

    C., et al

    Liu, G., Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/27

    2013 doi

  134. [147]

    2011, ApJ, 735, 63, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/63

    Liu, G., Koda, J., Calzetti, D., Fukuhara, M., & Momose, R. 2011, ApJ, 735, 63, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/63

    2011 doi

  135. [148]

    Liu, L., Gao, Y., & Greve, T. R. 2015, ApJ, 805, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/31

    2015 doi

  136. [149]

    Lombardi, M., Alves, J., & Lada, C. J. 2015, A&A, 576, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525650

    2015 doi

  137. [150]

    J., & Alves, J

    Lombardi, M., Lada, C. J., & Alves, J. 2010, A&A, 512, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912670 42Calzetti et al. Mac Low, M.-M., & Klessen, R. S. 2004, Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 125, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.125

    2010 doi

  138. [151]

    L., & Kennicutt, Jr., R

    Martin, C. L., & Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 2001, ApJ, 555, 301, doi: 10.1086/321452 Mart´ ınez-Garc´ ıa, E. E., Bruzual, G., Magris C., G., & Gonz´ alez-L´ opezlira, R. A. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1862, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2801

    2001 doi

  139. [152]

    2018, A&A, 619, A166, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833406

    Mattern, M., Kauffmann, J., Csengeri, T., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A166, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833406

    2018 doi

  140. [153]

    E., Schinnerer, E., van de Ven, G., et al

    Meidt, S. E., Schinnerer, E., van de Ven, G., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 144, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/144

    2014 doi

  141. [154]

    E., Glover, S

    Meidt, S. E., Glover, S. C. O., Klessen, R. S., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453564

    2025 doi

  142. [155]

    2022, MNRAS, 516, 2420, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2189

    Messa, M., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Richard, J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 2420, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2189

    2022 doi

  143. [156]

    2010, A&A, 518, L100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014659

    Molinari, S., Swinyard, B., Bally, J., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014659

    2010 doi

  144. [157]

    C., et al

    Momose, R., Koda, J., Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., et al. 2013, ApJL, 772, L13, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/772/1/L13

    2013 doi

  145. [158]

    2017, ApJ, 837, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6115

    Morokuma-Matsui, K., & Muraoka, K. 2017, ApJ, 837, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6115

    2017 doi

  146. [159]

    C., Dame, T

    Myers, P. C., Dame, T. M., Thaddeus, P., et al. 1986, ApJ, 301, 398, doi: 10.1086/163909

    1986 doi

  147. [160]

    2012, MNRAS, 421, 3127, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20536.x

    Hernquist, L. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 3127, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20536.x

    2012

  148. [161]

    Nguyen-Luong, Q., Nguyen, H. V. V., Motte, F., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 23, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/833/1/23

    2016 doi

  149. [162]

    Rahman, M., & Evans, II, N. J. 2017, ApJ, 841, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa704a

    2017 doi

  150. [163]

    S., Meurer, G

    Oey, M. S., Meurer, G. R., Yelda, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 661, 801, doi: 10.1086/517867

    2007 doi

  151. [164]

    2010, ApJL, 722, L127, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/722/2/L127

    Onodera, S., Kuno, N., Tosaki, T., et al. 2010, ApJL, 722, L127, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/722/2/L127

    2010 doi

  152. [165]

    E., Hayward, C

    Orr, M. E., Hayward, C. C., Hopkins, P. F., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 3653, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1241

    2018 doi

  153. [166]

    E., & Ferland, G

    Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  154. [167]

    C., & Kim, C.-G

    Ostriker, E. C., & Kim, C.-G. 2022, ApJ, 936, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7de2

    2022 doi

  155. [168]

    C., McKee, C

    Ostriker, E. C., McKee, C. F., & Leroy, A. K. 2010, ApJ, 721, 975, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/975

    2010 doi

  156. [169]

    2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed

    Padoan, P., Federrath, C., Chabrier, G., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 77–100, doi: 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816531240-ch004

    2014 doi

  157. [170]

    2011, ApJ, 730, 40, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/40

    Padoan, P., & Nordlund, ˚A. 2011, ApJ, 730, 40, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/40

    2011 doi

  158. [171]

    2023, ApJ, 955, 145, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace164

    Park, G., Lee, M.-Y., Bialy, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 955, 145, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace164

    2023 doi

  159. [172]

    K., Barnes, A

    Pathak, D., Leroy, A. K., Barnes, A. T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.22789, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.22789

    2025 doi

  160. [173]

    Patra, N. N. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 81, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3493

    2019 doi

  161. [174]

    2025, ApJ, 992, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0182

    Pedrini, A., Adamo, A., Bik, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0182

    2025 doi

  162. [175]

    W., Oey, M

    Pellegrini, E. W., Oey, M. S., Winkler, P. F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 40, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/1/40

    2012 doi

  163. [176]

    A., Betti, S

    Pokhrel, R., Gutermuth, R. A., Betti, S. K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 896, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab92a2

    2020 doi

  164. [177]

    A., Krumholz, M

    Pokhrel, R., Gutermuth, R. A., Krumholz, M. R., et al. 2021, ApJL, 912, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abf564

    2021 doi

  165. [178]

    S., et al

    Polak, B., Mac Low, M.-M., Klessen, R. S., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348840

    2024 doi

  166. [179]

    Flannery, B. P. 1992, Numerical recipes in FORTRAN. The art of scientific computing

    1992

  167. [180]

    D., Speck, A

    Preston, M. D., Speck, A. K., Dillon, S., & Sargent, B. 2025, ApJ, 979, 242, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada0bb

    2025 doi

  168. [181]

    E., Schinnerer, E., et al

    Querejeta, M., Meidt, S. E., Schinnerer, E., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 5, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/5

    2015 doi

  169. [182]

    E., Cao, Y., et al

    Querejeta, M., Meidt, S. E., Cao, Y., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A183, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556175

    2025 doi

  170. [183]

    D., Wong, T., et al

    Rahman, N., Bolatto, A. D., Wong, T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 72, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/72

    2011 doi

  171. [184]

    Ranaivoharimina, N., Randriamampandry, T., Wang, J., Men´ endez-Delmestre, K., & Gon¸ calves, T. S. 2024, ApJ, 977, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad85d5

    2024 doi

  172. [185]

    R., Zavagno, A., et al

    Rawat, V., Samal, M. R., Zavagno, A., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 2377, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf807

    2025 doi

  173. [186]

    D., Luna, A., & Carrasco, L

    Retes-Romero, R., Mayya, Y. D., Luna, A., & Carrasco, L. 2017, ApJ, 839, 113, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6afc

    2017 doi

  174. [187]

    Reynolds, R. J. 1984, ApJ, 282, 191, doi: 10.1086/162190 —. 1990, ApJL, 349, L17, doi: 10.1086/185640

    1984 doi

  175. [188]

    M., et al

    Roman-Duval, J., Heyer, M., Brunt, C. M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 818, 144, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/144

    2016 doi

  176. [189]

    2006, PASP, 118, 590, doi: 10.1086/502982

    Rosolowsky, E., & Leroy, A. 2006, PASP, 118, 590, doi: 10.1086/502982

    2006 doi

  177. [190]

    K., et al

    Rosolowsky, E., Hughes, A., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 1218, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab085

    2021 doi

  178. [191]

    2011, MNRAS, 415, 61, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18823.x

    Saintonge, A., Kauffmann, G., Wang, J., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 61, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18823.x

    2011

  179. [192]

    M., Federrath, C., & Kewley, L

    Salim, D. M., Federrath, C., & Kewley, L. J. 2015, ApJL, 806, L36, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/806/2/L36

    2015 doi

  180. [193]

    M., Leroy, A

    Sandstrom, K. M., Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 5, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/5 The HII-Regions’ Molecular Law of Star Formation43

    2013 doi

  181. [194]

    E., Pety, J., et al

    Schinnerer, E., Meidt, S. E., Pety, J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 42, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/42

    2013 doi

  182. [195]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  183. [196]

    1959, ApJ, 129, 243, doi: 10.1086/146614 —

    Schmidt, M. 1959, ApJ, 129, 243, doi: 10.1086/146614 —. 1963, ApJ, 137, 758, doi: 10.1086/147553

    1959 doi

  184. [197]

    Schneider, F. R. N., Sana, H., Evans, C. J., et al. 2018a, Science, 359, 69, doi: 10.1126/science.aan0106

    doi

  185. [198]

    Schneider, F. R. N., Ram´ ırez-Agudelo, O. H., Tramper, F., et al. 2018b, A&A, 618, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833433

    doi

  186. [199]

    2012, A&A, 540, L11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118566

    Schneider, N., Csengeri, T., Hennemann, M., et al. 2012, A&A, 540, L11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118566

    2012 doi

  187. [200]

    2016, A&A, 587, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527144

    Schneider, N., Bontemps, S., Motte, F., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527144

    2016 doi

  188. [201]

    2022, A&A, 666, A165, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039610

    Schneider, N., Ossenkopf-Okada, V., Clarke, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A165, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039610

    2022 doi

  189. [202]

    2025, A&A, 699, A354, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555308

    Schneider, N., Ossenkopf-Okada, V., R¨ ollig, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A354, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555308

    2025 doi

  190. [203]

    C., Li, R., et al

    Shangguan, J., Ho, L. C., Li, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 870, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf21a

    2019 doi

  191. [204]

    M., & Dye, S

    Sharda, P., Federrath, C., da Cunha, E., Swinbank, A. M., & Dye, S. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 4380, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty886

    2018 doi

  192. [205]

    E., Baker, A

    Sharon, C. E., Baker, A. J., Harris, A. I., & Thomson, A. P. 2013, ApJ, 765, 6, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/6

    2013 doi

  193. [206]

    E., Tagore, A

    Sharon, C. E., Tagore, A. S., Baker, A. J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 879, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab22b9

    2019 doi

  194. [207]

    C., & Klessen, R

    Shetty, R., Clark, P. C., & Klessen, R. S. 2014a, MNRAS, 442, 2208, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu919

    doi

  195. [208]

    C., & Bigiel, F

    Shetty, R., Kelly, B. C., & Bigiel, F. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 288, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts617

    2013 doi

  196. [209]

    C., Rahman, N., et al

    Shetty, R., Kelly, B. C., Rahman, N., et al. 2014b, MNRAS, 437, L61, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt156

    doi

  197. [210]

    2016, MNRAS, 460, 67, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw930

    Shetty, R., Roman-Duval, J., Hony, S., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 67, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw930

    2016 doi

  198. [211]

    1997, ApJ, 481, 703, doi: 10.1086/304073

    Silk, J. 1997, ApJ, 481, 703, doi: 10.1086/304073

    1997 doi

  199. [212]

    C., Tress, R

    Sormani, M. C., Tress, R. G., Glover, S. C. O., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 5024, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1999

    2020 doi

  200. [213]

    Silverman, J. D. 2014, ApJS, 214, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15

    2014 doi

  201. [214]

    2019, ApJS, 240, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaf1c8

    Su, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, S., et al. 2019, ApJS, 240, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaf1c8

    2019 doi

  202. [215]

    Sun, B., Calzetti, D., & Battisti, A. J. 2025, ApJ, 994, 145, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0f1a

    2025 doi

  203. [216]

    K., Ostriker, E

    Sun, J., Leroy, A. K., Ostriker, E. C., et al. 2023, ApJL, 945, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acbd9c

    2023 doi

  204. [217]

    J., Genzel, R., & Sternberg, A

    Tacconi, L. J., Genzel, R., & Sternberg, A. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 157, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141034

    2020 doi

  205. [218]

    J., Genzel, R., Saintonge, A., et al

    Tacconi, L. J., Genzel, R., Saintonge, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa4b4

    2018 doi

  206. [219]

    A., Braun, R., & Walterbos, R

    Thilker, D. A., Braun, R., & Walterbos, R. A. M. 2000, AJ, 120, 3070, doi: 10.1086/316852

    2000 doi

  207. [220]

    A., Saha, A., et al

    Thim, F., Tammann, G. A., Saha, A., et al. 2003, ApJ, 590, 256, doi: 10.1086/374888

    2003 doi

  208. [221]

    1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tody, D. 1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford, 733, doi: 10.1117/12.968154

    1986 doi

  209. [222]

    1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Tody, D. 1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 52, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, ed. R. J. Hanisch, R. J. V. Brissenden, & J. Barnes, 173

    1993

  210. [223]

    2002, ApJ, 574, 740, doi: 10.1086/341002

    Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., et al. 2002, ApJ, 574, 740, doi: 10.1086/341002

    2002 doi

  211. [224]

    K., et al

    Utomo, D., Sun, J., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2018, ApJL, 861, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aacf8f V´ azquez-Semadeni, E., G´ omez, G. C., Jappsen, A.-K.,

    2018 doi

  212. [225]

    Ballesteros-Paredes, J., & Klessen, R. S. 2009, ApJ, 707, 1023, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1023 V´ azquez-Semadeni, E., Gonz´ alez-Samaniego, A., & Col´ ın, P. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1313, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3229

    2009 doi

  213. [226]

    S., & Walterbos, R

    Voges, E. S., & Walterbos, R. A. M. 2006, ApJL, 644, L29, doi: 10.1086/505575

    2006 doi

  214. [227]

    J., Matsuura, M., et al

    Volk, K., Hrivnak, B. J., Matsuura, M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 127, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/127

    2011 doi

  215. [228]

    E., Mihos, J

    Watkins, A. E., Mihos, J. C., Harding, P., & Garner, R. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 4560, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1153

    2024 doi

  216. [229]

    2006, MNRAS, 365, 1333, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09824.x

    Weidner, C., & Kroupa, P. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 1333, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09824.x

    2006

  217. [230]

    R., Johnson, L

    Weisz, D. R., Johnson, L. C., Foreman-Mackey, D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 198, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/198

    2015 doi

  218. [231]

    J., Smith, R

    Whitworth, D. J., Smith, R. J., Tress, R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 4146, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3622

    2022 doi

  219. [232]

    2015, ApJ, 809, 87, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/87

    Willis, S., Guzman, A., Marengo, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 87, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/87

    2015 doi

  220. [233]

    D., Elmegreen, B

    Wilson, C. D., Elmegreen, B. G., Bemis, A., & Brunetti, N. 2019, ApJ, 882, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab31f3

    2019 doi

  221. [234]

    2002, ApJ, 569, 157, doi: 10.1086/339287

    Wong, T., & Blitz, L. 2002, ApJ, 569, 157, doi: 10.1086/339287

    2002 doi

  222. [235]

    2019, ApJ, 885, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab46ba

    Wong, T., Hughes, A., Tokuda, K., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab46ba

    2019 doi

  223. [236]

    Wyse, R. F. G., & Silk, J. 1989, ApJ, 339, 700, doi: 10.1086/167329

    1989 doi

  224. [237]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 3217, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3308

    Zhang, K., Yan, R., Bundy, K., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 3217, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3308

    2017 doi

  225. [238]

    W., & Dib, S

    Zhou, J. W., & Dib, S. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 4014, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1911 44Calzetti et al

    2025 doi

  226. [239]

    2017, MNRAS, 471, 3494, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1580

    Zhu, H., Tian, W., Li, A., & Zhang, M. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 3494, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1580

    2017 doi

  227. [240]

    2009, MNRAS, 400, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15528.x

    Zibetti, S., Charlot, S., & Rix, H.-W. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15528.x

    2009

  228. [241]

    Zuckerman, B., & Evans, II, N. J. 1974, ApJL, 192, L149, doi: 10.1086/181613

    1974 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.