UART for Wearables (U4We): DC Power and Carrierless Signal Transfer over Conductive Textiles

Akihito Noda

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 18 references

UART for Wearables (U4We): DC Power and Carrierless Signal Transfer over Conductive Textiles

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A two-layer conductive textile can carry DC power and carrierless UART data at 1 Mb/s when the bus is critically damped.

desk verdict A clean second-order design framework for carrierless UART over conductive textiles, with a plausible but unproven lumped model for the textile. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.01843 v1 pith:Y6KTSMZS submitted 2026-08-03 eess.SP cs.HC

Akihito Noda This is my paper

classification eess.SPcs.HC

keywords conductivetextilee-textilesUARTcarrierlesscommunicationDCpoweranddatatransfersecond-ordercircuitmodelwearablenetworksbatterylessmodules

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that a two-layer conductive textile, with an insulating fabric between, can act as a shared bus that delivers DC power and carries digital data at the same time, without any carrier modulation. The central claim is a design rule: for a given textile capacitance and resistance, a UART link is feasible exactly when the combined inductance of all attached modules lies between 4Rtex^2 Ctex and T0^2/(4π^2 Ctex), where T0 is the pulse duration. The paper derives this from a second-order transient model of the textile bus and shows that critically damped operation (damping ratio ζ=1) turns each UART edge into a single non-oscillatory spike that a simple comparator can recover. A prototype with one transmitter and 28 receiver modules operated at 1 Mb/s over a 40 cm square textile, supporting the model. A sympathetic reader would care because it offers a path to batteryless, antenna-less distributed wearable modules with minimal circuit overhead.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the second-order transient model of the shared textile bus with lumped parallel Ctex and L∥, and the derived critical-damping condition ζ=1. From it the paper obtains a closed-form edge response v_RX(t)=2ω0 t e^{−ω0 t} and two inequalities, L∥>4Rtex^2 Ctex and L∥<T0^2/(4π^2 Ctex), that define the feasible design region for any given data rate, textile capacitance, and textile resistance. The work this does is to turn a seemingly ad hoc analog-signaling problem into a checkable parameter window.

What would settle it

Measure the input impedance across the two textile layers from 1 kHz to 10 MHz on a 40 cm square sample; the lumped model predicts a pure capacitive reactance in series with a constant Rtex, so a resonant peak, a frequency-dependent Ctex beyond ~20%, or standing-wave ripples at the UART operating frequency would falsify the model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core claim is that the textile bus is adequately described as a parallel RLC circuit: the textile itself contributes a capacitance Ctex, all modules' decoupling inductors appear in parallel as L∥, and a damping resistor RD controls the transient. The step response is governed by the natural frequency ω0=1/√(L∥Ctex) and the damping ratio ζ=(1/(2RD))√(L∥/Ctex). For ζ=1, the received edge becomes v_RX(t)=2ω0 t e^{−ω0 t}, a spike that returns to baseline without oscillation. Combining critical damping with the requirement that the spike decay before the next edge (ω0 T0 > 2π) yields the bounds on L∥: it must exceed 4Rtex^2 Ctex and stay below T0^2/(4π^2 Ctex). When these bounds leave

Load-bearing premise

The textile is modeled as a single lumped capacitor with series resistance appearing only in a lower-bound constraint; if the two-layer fabric behaves as a distributed transmission line, or if its capacitance and resistance change with bending, contact, or position, the second-order model and the derived inductor bounds do not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the design inequalities hold, a module needs no carrier generation, no RF front end, and no battery: a comparator and an inductor are enough to receive power and data from the shared textile.
Higher bit rates shrink the feasible region: the pulse duration T0 must satisfy T0 > 4π Rtex Ctex for any inductor value to exist, so textile resistance and capacitance set a hard ceiling on data rate.
Scaling to many receivers is straightforward if RX inductors are chosen much larger than the TX inductor; in the 28-module demo, L∥ changed only from 8.2 μH to 6.7 μH and no re-tuning was needed.
The same carrierless edge-coupling principle can in principle be used with any pulse-based digital signaling, not only UART, since the model only cares about pulse edges and pulse duration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the model treats the textile as a single lumped capacitor, the derived inequalities are only as valid as that approximation; a natural test is to probe the two-layer textile's impedance over frequency and under deformation, and to measure how Ctex and Rtex change with bending and module placement.
The broadcast physical layer implies a medium-access problem: with many modules transmitting, address-based framing alone cannot prevent collisions; the paper does not address a MAC scheme, so a practical system needs a protocol layer on top.
The minimum-pulse condition T0>4π Rtex Ctex suggests a trade-off: decreasing textile sheet resistance (e.g., denser metal plating) directly buys higher achievable data rate, which could guide textile material design.
If contact resistance between the pin-and-socket fasteners drifts during wear, Rtex in the lower bound should be interpreted as the total series resistance including contacts; monitoring the baseline wander or adding an adaptive damping trimmer could extend the design to real garments.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First, what's new: the paper gives explicit feasibility inequalities (L between 4 Rtex^2 Ctex and T0^2/(4 pi^2 Ctex)) for AC-coupled UART pulses on a two-layer conductive textile, with critical damping as the design target. That's a practical addition to the prior TDM/FDM schemes, and the derivation from the RLC equivalent is straightforward and correct. The experimental waveforms in Fig. 7 reproduce the three damping regimes, and the 28-module demo shows the broadcast concept works at 1 Mb/s. All of that is real.

The soft spots are the ones you'd expect. The biggest is the lumped capacitor model for the textile. The paper treats a 40 cm square as a single Ctex and ignores the distributed nature, position dependence, and contact resistance. The feasibility map in Fig. 5 is only as good as that assumption, and there's no frequency-domain impedance measurement or position sweep. The intro does say contact structure and deformation are out of scope, which is honest, but the claim that the framework 'determines whether a given combination ... is feasible' outruns the evidence. A second, minor issue: the 2*pi decay margin is a guess, not a derived bound. It's reasonable, but it has the status of a heuristic. Also, for a power/data scheme there's no delivered DC power or BER data; you have to take the 'batteryless' claim on faith that the DC path works at useful current.

None of these are fatal. The circuit theory is sound and the demonstration is enough to show the principle. The paper would be stronger with one impedance measurement of the textile and a quick BER test. As a brief, it's a valid contribution to the e-textile hardware toolbox. I'd send it to review, and ask the authors to add the missing characterization. For someone working on wearable interconnection, it's worth a read.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a carrierless UART power/data bus over double-sided conductive textile. A lumped-element AC model reduces the bus to a parallel RLC circuit (damping resistor RD, textile capacitance Ctex, equivalent inductance L∥) and derives a second-order step response, a critical-damping condition, and design inequalities (Eqs. (7)-(8)) that delineate the feasible L∥ range for given Ctex, Rtex, and UART pulse duration T0. A prototype on a 40 cm-square textile demonstrates one-way 1 Mb/s UART to multiple RX modules, with measured waveforms shown for single-RX under underdamped, critically damped, and overdamped conditions.

Significance. The analytical derivation is clear, textbook-based, and algebraically correct under the stated lumped-model assumptions; the three measured damping regimes in Fig. 7 support the circuit-level picture. If the lumped-capacitor model is validated for the distributed textile, the paper offers a genuinely simple, low-overhead method for simultaneous DC power and data distribution to batteryless wearable modules, and the feasibility map in Fig. 5 would be a useful design tool. The main risk is that the central claim of a general feasibility criterion depends on an unverified equivalence between a 40 cm square distributed textile and a single lumped Ctex; this is the key point that needs strengthening.

major comments (3)

[Section III, Fig. 3, Eqs. (1)-(4) and Fig. 5] The model replaces the two-layer textile with a single ideal capacitor Ctex and does not include the textile's distributed series resistance in the transfer function. No impedance measurement, frequency sweep, or position-dependence test is reported for the 40 cm-square specimen. If the terminal impedance of the textile is not a single pole over the operating band, the second-order response (2), the critical-damping condition (6), and the inequalities (7)-(8) do not follow for arbitrary module positions. Please provide measured textile impedance over the relevant frequency range and a position/deformation sensitivity study, or explicitly restrict the feasibility claim to the demonstrated configuration.
[Section IV, Eq. (8)] The lower bound L∥ > 4 Rtex^2 Ctex is derived from critical damping (6) together with RD > Rtex, but Rtex does not appear in the equivalent circuit or transfer function (1). If the textile resistance is in series with Ctex, the branch impedance is Rtex + 1/(sCtex), which changes the denominator and the effective damping condition; RD > Rtex alone would not guarantee ζ=1. The authors should either include Rtex explicitly in the circuit model and re-derive the lower bound, or provide measurements showing that the series resistance is negligible at the signal frequencies used.
[Section V, Figs. 7 and 8] The waveform validation is performed for a representative single-RX configuration (Fig. 7), while the 28-module demonstration is presented only as a photograph with a qualitative statement of stable operation. No bit-error-rate measurements, eye diagrams, or per-module waveform data are reported, and there is no test of how the received waveform varies with RX position on the 40 cm textile. Since the design framework claims to support modules at arbitrary positions, quantitative multi-node and position-dependence data are needed to support the generality claim.

minor comments (5)

[Section III, Eq. (5) and Fig. 4] The step input is normalized to V0=1/s, so vRX(t) is a dimensionless normalized voltage. Please state this explicitly in the text and on the vertical axis of Fig. 4 to avoid unit ambiguity.
[Table I] The last row is typeset confusingly; separate the M=1 and M=28 cases into distinct rows or use a clear formula for L∥ as a function of M.
[Fig. 7 caption] The caption contains corrupted character sequences ("/uni00000013/...") that should be cleaned up for publication.
[Section V] The 1 kHz LPF cutoff and the 50 mV hysteresis width are chosen empirically. These are additional design parameters not covered by the analytical criteria; please acknowledge them as implementation-specific and discuss their sensitivity briefly.
[Abstract and Section VI] The claim that 1 Mb/s is 'close to the typical upper operating range of MCU UART interfaces' is vague; some MCU UARTs support higher rates. Consider softening or citing a representative range.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the design equations are derived from an explicit circuit model and validated with damping resistances set to the theoretical values.

full rationale

The central derivation (Eqs. (1)-(8)) is self-contained: starting from the AC equivalent circuit in Fig. 3, the paper derives a standard second-order RLC transfer function and obtains the critical-damping relation (6), the decay-time upper bound (7), and the resistance lower bound (8) by algebra. No parameter is fitted to the experimental outcome; the prototype chooses L∥=8.2 μH and sets RD to the values corresponding to the theoretical ζ from Eq. (4) (8 Ω → ζ≈5, 40 Ω → ζ≈1, 200 Ω → ζ≈0.2). The measured waveforms are compared across the three damping regimes, so the validation is not a self-fulfilling fit. The 28-RX test uses the same design point with L∥ changing from 8.2 to 6.7 μH and intentionally does not readjust the critical condition, which is a robustness check rather than a fitted prediction. Self-citations ([15]-[17]) are historical/contextual and carry no load-bearing premise; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior work. The main vulnerability is the unverified lumped-capacitance approximation for the textile, but that is an assumption/correctness risk, not circularity, because the derivation is not equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a lumped-element circuit model where the textile is a capacitor Ctex and the modules' inductors are ideal parallel inductors; these are domain assumptions, not measured or simulated beyond the single representative sample. The free parameters are the hand-chosen decay margin and the empirically set comparator hysteresis and threshold filter, none of which are derived from first principles.

free parameters (3)

Decay-margin threshold 2*pi = 2*pi (dimensionless)
The condition omega0*T0 > 2*pi is introduced in Section III as 'decays substantially by around omega0*t=2*pi' and is used to derive the upper bound (7). The constant is chosen by hand; at this point the critically damped response has ~2.4% residual, and any other margin would change the feasible region.
Hysteresis width DeltaVhys = ~50 mV
Chosen empirically in Section V to suppress false switching; not derived from noise or signal statistics.
Threshold LPF cutoff frequency = 1 kHz
Chosen in Section V as two to three orders below the UART signal rate to track baseline wander; the exact value is a design choice not derived from the model.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The two-layer conductive textile behaves as a single lumped capacitance Ctex with negligible series resistance in the signal path.
Section III, Fig. 3: the textile is represented only by Ctex in the equivalent circuit, while Rtex appears only as a lower bound on RD. Distributed and frequency-dependent effects are ignored.
domain assumption All TX/RX inductors appear in parallel and their parasitic resistance/capacitance is negligible; the receiver input is an open circuit and the smoothing capacitor is a short at signal frequencies.
Section III, Fig. 3(a): components are approximated as open or short at the signal frequency.
domain assumption A UART pulse edge can be treated as a unit step for the transient analysis, and edge responses do not overlap if omega0*T0 > 2*pi.
Section III and IV: the step response is used to derive the spike shape, and the residual at omega0*t=2*pi (~2.4%) is asserted to be negligible for comparator recovery.
standard math Standard Laplace and second-order linear circuit theory apply to the textile bus.
Equations (1)-(5) invoke standard circuit analysis; this is unproved background.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of UART for Wearables (U4We): DC Power and Carrierless Signal Transfer over Conductive Textiles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y6KTSMZS

@misc{pith2026260801843,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: UART for Wearables (U4We): DC Power and Carrierless Signal Transfer over Conductive Textiles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y6KTSMZS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01843}
}

read the original abstract

This brief presents a conductive-textile interconnection scheme for batteryless distributed wearable modules. Two conductive textile layers separated by an insulating fabric layer are used as a transmission line that simultaneously conveys DC power and pulse-based data signals without point-to-point wiring. To minimize the circuit overhead of each module, universal asynchronous receiver/transmitter (UART) pulses are directly coupled onto the textile through AC-coupling capacitors without carrier modulation. The textile waveform is modeled as the transient response of a second-order circuit, and design conditions for comparator-based waveform recovery and high-bitrate transmission are analytically derived. The resulting design framework determines whether a given combination of data rate, textile capacitance and resistance is feasible, and also provides the corresponding design range of the decoupling inductors. These results establish a basic methodology for textile-based simultaneous power and data transfer.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01843 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** AC equivalent circuit of the signal path from the TX to the RXs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Step response waveforms. In wearable garments such as jackets and pants, Ctex is typically on the order of nanofarads. Likewise, for conductive textiles made of metal-plated fibers, Rtex is typically on the order of 1 Ω. These values provide a practical range for discussing the feasible design region. The first design requirement is critical damping, ζ = 1, which follows from the waveform-recovery discussion in Sec… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Schematic diagram of the experimental prototype (relevant portion). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Measured waveforms for the representative single-RX configura [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Prototype implementation with 28 RX modules on the same conductive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references

[1]

A tailored, electronic textile conformable suit for large-scale spatiotemporal physiological sensing in vivo,

I. Wicaksono, C. I. Tucker, T. Sun, C. A. Guerrero, C. Liu, W. M. Woo, E. J. Pence, and C. Dagdeviren, “A tailored, electronic textile conformable suit for large-scale spatiotemporal physiological sensing in vivo,”npj Flexible Electronics, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 5, 2020

2020
[2]

Battery-free smart sock for abnormal relative plantar pressure monitoring,

X. Lin and B.-C. Seet, “Battery-free smart sock for abnormal relative plantar pressure monitoring,”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 464–473, 2017

2017
[3]

Synesthesia Wear: Full-body haptic clothing interface based on two-dimensional signal transmission,

T. Furukawa, N. Hanamitsu, Y . Kamiyama, H. Nii, C. Krekoukiotis, K. Minamizawa, A. Noda, J. Yamada, K. Kitamura, D. Niwa, Y . Hi- rano, and T. Mizuguchi, “Synesthesia Wear: Full-body haptic clothing interface based on two-dimensional signal transmission,” inSIGGRAPH Asia 2019 Emerging Technologies, ser. SA ’19, 2019, p. 48–50

2019
[4]

Water stable and matrix addressable oled fiber textiles for wearable displays with large emission area,

H. Song, Y . J. Song, J. Hong, K. S. Kang, S. Yu, H.-E. Cho, J.-H. Kim, and S.-M. Lee, “Water stable and matrix addressable oled fiber textiles for wearable displays with large emission area,”npj Flexible Electronics, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 66, 2022

2022
[5]

Wireless battery-free body sensor networks using near- field-enabled clothing,

R. Lin, S. Achavananthadith, M. M. Kurt, J. T. C. Liu, J. A. Rogers, and J. S. Ho, “Wireless battery-free body sensor networks using near- field-enabled clothing,”Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 444, 2020

2020
[6]

NFC/RFID-enabled wearables and implants for biomedical applications,

H. Zou, Z. Zhou, M. Huang, W. Li, B. Yang, X. Zhao, T. Li, L. Xu, T. Wang, and L. Wang, “NFC/RFID-enabled wearables and implants for biomedical applications,”Microsystems & Nanoengineering, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 191, 2025

2025
[7]

A Review on Human Body Communication: Signal Propagation Model, Communica- tion Performance, and Experimental Issues,

J. F. Zhao, X. M. Chen, B. D. Liang, and Q. X. Chen, “A Review on Human Body Communication: Signal Propagation Model, Communica- tion Performance, and Experimental Issues,”Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2017, no. 1, p. 5842310, 2017

2017
[8]

Wearable Electronics and Smart Textiles: A Critical Review,

M. Stoppa and A. Chiolerio, “Wearable Electronics and Smart Textiles: A Critical Review,”Sensors, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 11 957–11 992, 2014

2014

Show all 18 references

[9]

Integration of conductive materials with textile structures, an overview,

G. B. Tseghai, B. Malengier, K. A. Fante, A. B. Nigusse, and L. Van Langenhove, “Integration of conductive materials with textile structures, an overview,”Sensors, vol. 20, no. 23, 2020

2020
[10]

The development of screen printed conductive networks on textiles for biopotential monitoring applications,

G. Paul, R. Torah, S. Beeby, and J. Tudor, “The development of screen printed conductive networks on textiles for biopotential monitoring applications,”Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 206, pp. 35–41, 2014

2014
[11]

Inkjet printing of conductive nanomaterials on textiles for wearable electronics: Advancements, challenges, and future prospects,

B. K. Dejene, “Inkjet printing of conductive nanomaterials on textiles for wearable electronics: Advancements, challenges, and future prospects,” Materials Today Advances, vol. 28, p. 100629, 2025

2025
[12]

Embroidered Electrode with Silver/Titanium Coating for Long-Term ECG Monitoring,

M. Weder, D. Hegemann, M. Amberg, M. Hess, L. F. Boesel, R. Ab ¨acherli, V . R. Meyer, and R. M. Rossi, “Embroidered Electrode with Silver/Titanium Coating for Long-Term ECG Monitoring,”Sensors, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1750–1759, 2015

2015
[13]

Digitally-embroidered liquid metal electronic textiles for wearable wireless systems,

R. Lin, H.-J. Kim, S. Achavananthadith, Z. Xiong, J. K. W. Lee, Y . L. Kong, and J. S. Ho, “Digitally-embroidered liquid metal electronic textiles for wearable wireless systems,”Nature Communications, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 2190, 2022

2022
[14]

Flexible network infrastructure for wearable computing using conductive fabric and its evaluation,

J. Akita, T. Shinmura, and M. Toda, “Flexible network infrastructure for wearable computing using conductive fabric and its evaluation,” in 26th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW’06), 2006, pp. 65–65

2006
[15]

Fast half- duplex communication on e-textile based wearable networks,

Y . Zhu, A. Noda, M. Fujiwara, Y . Makino, and H. Shinoda, “Fast half- duplex communication on e-textile based wearable networks,”IEICE Communications Express, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 426–432, 2020

2020
[16]

Inter-IC for Wearables (I2We): Power and Data Transfer Over Double-Sided Conductive Textile,

A. Noda and H. Shinoda, “Inter-IC for Wearables (I2We): Power and Data Transfer Over Double-Sided Conductive Textile,”IEEE Transac- tions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 80–90, 2019

2019
[17]

Demonstration of asynchronous serial communication to bat- teryless modules on conductive textile,

A. Noda, “Demonstration of asynchronous serial communication to bat- teryless modules on conductive textile,” in2025 IEEE 22nd Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), 2025, pp. 1–2

2025
[18]

Conductive fabric (metal fiber),

MAC Corporation, “Conductive fabric (metal fiber),” https://denjiha.macco.co.jp/fabric/

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

A tailored, electronic textile conformable suit for large-scale spatiotemporal physiological sensing in vivo,

I. Wicaksono, C. I. Tucker, T. Sun, C. A. Guerrero, C. Liu, W. M. Woo, E. J. Pence, and C. Dagdeviren, “A tailored, electronic textile conformable suit for large-scale spatiotemporal physiological sensing in vivo,”npj Flexible Electronics, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 5, 2020

2020

[2] [2]

Battery-free smart sock for abnormal relative plantar pressure monitoring,

X. Lin and B.-C. Seet, “Battery-free smart sock for abnormal relative plantar pressure monitoring,”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 464–473, 2017

2017

[3] [3]

Synesthesia Wear: Full-body haptic clothing interface based on two-dimensional signal transmission,

T. Furukawa, N. Hanamitsu, Y . Kamiyama, H. Nii, C. Krekoukiotis, K. Minamizawa, A. Noda, J. Yamada, K. Kitamura, D. Niwa, Y . Hi- rano, and T. Mizuguchi, “Synesthesia Wear: Full-body haptic clothing interface based on two-dimensional signal transmission,” inSIGGRAPH Asia 2019 Emerging Technologies, ser. SA ’19, 2019, p. 48–50

2019

[4] [4]

Water stable and matrix addressable oled fiber textiles for wearable displays with large emission area,

H. Song, Y . J. Song, J. Hong, K. S. Kang, S. Yu, H.-E. Cho, J.-H. Kim, and S.-M. Lee, “Water stable and matrix addressable oled fiber textiles for wearable displays with large emission area,”npj Flexible Electronics, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 66, 2022

2022

[5] [5]

Wireless battery-free body sensor networks using near- field-enabled clothing,

R. Lin, S. Achavananthadith, M. M. Kurt, J. T. C. Liu, J. A. Rogers, and J. S. Ho, “Wireless battery-free body sensor networks using near- field-enabled clothing,”Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 444, 2020

2020

[6] [6]

NFC/RFID-enabled wearables and implants for biomedical applications,

H. Zou, Z. Zhou, M. Huang, W. Li, B. Yang, X. Zhao, T. Li, L. Xu, T. Wang, and L. Wang, “NFC/RFID-enabled wearables and implants for biomedical applications,”Microsystems & Nanoengineering, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 191, 2025

2025

[7] [7]

A Review on Human Body Communication: Signal Propagation Model, Communica- tion Performance, and Experimental Issues,

J. F. Zhao, X. M. Chen, B. D. Liang, and Q. X. Chen, “A Review on Human Body Communication: Signal Propagation Model, Communica- tion Performance, and Experimental Issues,”Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2017, no. 1, p. 5842310, 2017

2017

[8] [8]

Wearable Electronics and Smart Textiles: A Critical Review,

M. Stoppa and A. Chiolerio, “Wearable Electronics and Smart Textiles: A Critical Review,”Sensors, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 11 957–11 992, 2014

2014