Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 35 references

A Heterogeneous 200 mm Silicon Nitride Photonics Platform for Visible-to-Near-Infrared Applications via Micro-Transfer Printing

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A 200 mm CMOS-fabricated silicon nitride platform, augmented with an amorphous-silicon interlayer and micro-transfer-printed GaAs gain chips, demonstrates low-loss visible-to-near-infrared photonics and evanescently coupled 970 nm lasers wi

desk verdict A real wafer-scale advance for visible-to-NIR SiN integration, but the transition-loss validation is looser than the text suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02037 v1 pith:BAAEBDQE submitted 2026-08-03 physics.optics

Konstantinos Akritidis , Gaudhaman Jeevanandam , Manuel Reza , Maximilien Billet , Jeonghwan Song , Sandeep Seema Saseendran , Vittal Prakasam , Jan-Philipp Koester
show 6 more authors
Jörg Fricke Günther Roelkens Markus Weyers Roelof Jansen Pol Van Dorpe Bart Kuyken
This is my paper
classification physics.optics PACS 42.82.-m
keywords siliconnitridephotonicsmicro-transferprintingvisibleandnear-infraredheterogeneousintegrationamorphousinterlayerevanescentcouplingGaAslaserswafer-scaleCMOSplatform
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a wafer-scale photonic platform built in a 200 mm CMOS pilot line that combines two silicon nitride layers with a hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) interlayer. The authors show that this stack supports low-loss waveguides across the visible-to-near-infrared range, with propagation losses of 4.08 dB/cm at 488 nm and 0.23 dB/cm at 940 nm, and that a carefully designed three-stage taper couples light into the a-Si:H layer with only 0.35 dB/transition loss. They then integrate prefabricated GaAs amplifiers via micro-transfer printing into recesses on the platform, achieving consistent evanescently coupled lasing at 970 nm with about 1 mW on-chip power across multiple dies. If correct, the platform offers a scalable, foundry-compatible route to multifunctional photonic circuits in the sub-1-micron spectral region, a range important for AR/VR, quantum, medical, and sensing applications.

What carries the argument

The enabling mechanism is the dual-thickness a-Si:H interlayer: a 70 nm-thick section phase-matches the mode from SiN, a 220 nm-thick section phase-matches to the III-V device, and a three-stage adiabatic taper (total length 50 µm) transfers the mode with low loss. Micro-transfer printing places prefabricated GaAs amplifiers into recesses over these waveguides, decoupling the active-device fabrication from the CMOS process and enabling wafer-scale heterogeneous integration.

What would settle it

Fabricate a 1 cm long single-mode a-Si:H waveguide of width 500 nm and measure its cutback loss at 940 nm; if the loss is substantially higher than 17.22 dB/cm, the transition-loss and laser-power budgets in the paper would be overly optimistic. Alternatively, measure the excess loss of a chain of SiN-to-a-Si:H transitions where the a-Si:H segment is replaced by a non-absorbing material of identical geometry to isolate the roughness-scattering contribution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery is that a dual-layer LPCVD silicon nitride waveguide stack, combined with an a-Si:H interlayer etched to two thicknesses (70 nm and 220 nm), can be fabricated at 200 mm wafer scale and used to evanescently couple micro-transfer-printed III-V gain elements. The central mechanism is a compact 50-micron-long adiabatic taper that phase-matches the mode from a 300 nm-thick SiN waveguide to the thick a-Si:H layer, achieving a measured transition loss of 0.35 dB/transition with good agreement to simulation. Using this coupling scheme, GaAs-based amplifiers micro-transfer printed onto recessed a-Si:H waveguides form Fabry-Perot lasers that emit at 970 nm with a threshold around 35

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the propagation loss of a-Si:H measured in wide multimode spirals (17.22 dB/cm at 940 nm) is the same material absorption that applies in the narrow single-mode tapers and under the laser, and that the fabricated taper cross-section matches the simulated one closely enough that the measured 0.35 dB/transition loss validates the design.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The platform supports single-mode propagation from 488 nm to 940 nm with losses below 5 dB/cm, covering a broad visible-to-NIR range on one chip.
  • Evanescent coupling through the a-Si:H interlayer avoids butt-coupling, eliminating the need for cleaved facets and easing alignment tolerances.
  • The same a-Si:H layers can serve additional functions such as visible-light photodetection or polarization filtering, extending the platform's versatility.
  • Micro-transfer printing of GaAs amplifiers works uniformly across a 200 mm wafer, indicating that the process is ready for high-yield manufacturing.
  • The dual-layer SiN stack (60/150/300 nm thicknesses) accommodates different wavelengths and device types, enabling a vision of a fully integrated active-passive photonic library.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the a-Si:H loss measured in wide multimode spirals (17.22 dB/cm) truly represents the material absorption in the narrow single-mode taper and laser sections, then the transition losses and laser power budgets are validated; a direct measurement on a single-mode a-Si:H waveguide would tighten this assumption.
  • The measured a-Si:H thickness variation (205–230 nm across the wafer) likely lies within the tolerance of the phase-matching design, but systematic correlation of laser threshold with local a-Si:H thickness would test the robustness claim directly.
  • The platform's success at 970 nm suggests that the same evanescent-coupling architecture could be extended to other III-V gain materials, such as InP or GaN, to push toward shorter visible wavelengths or to C-band telecom, though the a-Si:H absorption edge limits the short-wavelength range.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a 200 mm CMOS pilot-line silicon nitride platform with two LPCVD SiN layers (60/150/300 nm thicknesses), a PECVD a-Si:H interlayer with two etch depths, and recesses for micro-transfer printing. Cutback measurements give median propagation losses of 4.08 dB/cm at 488 nm (150 nm SiN) and 0.23 dB/cm at 940 nm (300 nm SiN); wide multimode a-Si:H spirals give 17.22 dB/cm at 940 nm. Cascaded-transition measurements yield 0.11 dB/transition to the 70 nm a-Si:H layer and 0.35 dB/transition to the 220 nm layer. GaAs amplifiers are micro-transfer printed onto eight dies across two wafers, forming Sagnac-mirror Fabry-Perot lasers that lase at 970 nm with a median on-chip power of about 1 mW at 80 mA. The authors claim wafer-scale uniformity and use simulations to validate the adiabatic SiN-to-a-Si:H transition design.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a useful step toward a scalable heterogeneous VIS/NIR photonic platform: it combines low-loss SiN, an a-Si:H index-intermediate layer for evanescent coupling, and micro-transfer printing in a 200 mm CMOS flow. The strengths include die-level statistics across wafers, standard cutback and cascaded-transition metrology, and reproducible lasing on eight dies. The main weakness is the quantitative validation of the transition design, where the simulation-to-measurement comparison is not as strong as claimed and is partly dependent on an unquantified roughness contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, Fig. 5(f)] The claimed 'strong agreement' between simulation and measurement is not quantitatively supported. The simulated values in Fig. 5(f) are 0.046 and 0.195 dB/transition, while the measured medians are 0.11 and 0.35 dB/transition (Fig. 5(d,e)). The factor-of-two discrepancy is attributed entirely to 'roughness-induced scattering not accounted for in the simulations,' but no roughness amplitude, correlation length, or independent scattering measurement is given. Because the simulation uses the 1.6-µm-wide spiral loss (17.22 dB/cm) as the a-Si:H material-absorption input, the comparison cannot separate material absorption, sidewall scattering in narrow single-mode tapers (widths down to 150 nm), and mode-conversion loss. I therefore view 'validates the design' as an overclaim. Please add a roughness model with measured parameters, measure propagation loss at the actual taper widths, or soften
  2. [§4.1, Fig. 5(c-f)] The load-bearing use of the wide multimode spiral loss as the material-absorption input for the transition-loss simulation is problematic. The wide spirals are deliberately chosen to minimize sidewall scattering, so they cannot constrain the scattering term in the narrow tapers; the residual between measurement and simulation is therefore not necessarily only roughness. It could include mode conversion and the fact that the spiral loss itself contains residual scattering. The reported 0.35 dB/transition is an empirical upper-bound transition loss for the current fabrication, not a validated adiabatic design value. This distinction matters for the laser cavity loss budget in §4.2, where the 70%-transmission amplifier tapers are used but the per-transition loss is not independently verified in the lasing configuration.
  3. [§4.1/§4.2] The wafer-scale statistics are weakened by undocumented exclusions. Five 488 nm dies with low signal were fit with shorter spirals, two 940 nm edge dies could not be measured, and one edge die was excluded from the mirror statistics in Fig. 6(c,d) as 'abnormally high loss.' These are probably legitimate measurement failures, but the manuscript does not state pre-defined exclusion criteria or report the number of dies per statistic. As the uniformity claim is a central selling point, please provide a die-count flow and show the excluded points in the color maps or supplementary data.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.1] The a-Si:H propagation loss is measured at 940 nm on wide spirals, while the lasers emit at 970 nm. State explicitly whether 17.22 dB/cm is assumed flat to 970 nm, and cite the previous 970 nm cutback data (Ref. [32]) for this assumption.
  2. [§4.1] The phrase 'transition loss, which includes the propagation loss of all materials' is confusing. Define the fitted quantity: is 0.11/0.35 dB/transition the slope of excess loss versus number of transitions, and what transition length is used to separate propagation from junction loss?
  3. [§4.1/Fig. 5(f)] Fig. 5(f) lacks error bars on the simulated points and does not state whether the measured points are medians or means; include IQR or min-max ranges.
  4. [§4.1] The statement 'a 50% reduction in loss compared to previous reports [32]' needs the baseline value and a statement that the comparison uses the same taper design and measurement method; otherwise it is not verifiable.
  5. [General] Typos: 'of of 51 dies' (Section 4.1); 'The devices exhibits' (Section 4.2); 'wides to 3µm' (Section 2); the Fig. 1 caption contains a garbled string ('Hm re ot fe ta og lp en ele bo iu sis v lo Niw S- l sos').

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the platform's central loss and lasing results are direct measurements, and the simulation-to-measurement comparison uses an independently measured material-loss input without fitting the target.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental: propagation losses are extracted by cutback from spiral waveguides (Fig. 5a–c), transition losses are extracted from cascaded chains with increasing transition counts (Fig. 5d–e), and lasing is demonstrated on eight dies with calibrated on-chip power (Fig. 6e–f). The only apparent loop is the comparison in Fig. 5(f), where the simulation incorporates the a-Si:H loss measured from wide spirals as an input. However, the measured transition loss is not computed from that input; it is an independent slope obtained from structures with varying numbers of transitions. The simulation therefore serves as a prediction using a measured material parameter, and the small discrepancy is attributed to roughness scattering not included in the model. That is a modeling limitation, not circularity. Self-citations to prior work [32, 34] provide design context and baseline values, but the wafer-scale evanescent-coupling and lasing results are re-demonstrated here by direct measurement, so those citations are not load-bearing in a circular way. No uniqueness theorem, renamed ansatz, or fitted constant functions as the derivation of the reported results.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The platform's reported performance rests on measured quantities and standard simulation tools; no ad hoc fitting parameters are introduced. The main unstated inputs are the assumptions about loss extraction and the transferability of the a-Si:H material loss to narrow waveguides, listed above.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Cutback loss extraction assumes propagation loss is linear in waveguide length and grating coupler losses cancel out.
    Invoked in Section 4.1 for all propagation loss values; nonlinear length dependence or coupler variability would bias the extracted dB/cm.
  • domain assumption The SiN loss at 940 nm is spectrally flat over the 940±10 nm window used to median-average the loss.
    Stated in Section 4.1: 'Assuming negligible spectral variation over such short range, and hence a spectrally flat behavior'; an unverified assumption that feeds into the 0.23 dB/cm figure.
  • domain assumption a-Si:H material loss extracted from 1.6 µm wide multimode spirals (17.22 dB/cm at 940 nm) applies to the narrow single-mode taper and laser waveguides.
    The loss measurement isolates absorption by minimizing sidewall scattering (Section 4.1), and the transition-loss simulations of Fig. 5(f) feed this value directly into predictions for much narrower waveguides with higher scattering.
  • domain assumption Lumerical FDE and EME simulations accurately model the adiabatic taper designs, with unmodeled roughness scattering being the only discrepancy.
    The measured-versus-simulated comparison in Fig. 5(f) and the taper design in Section 2 rely on this, attributing residual error to roughness without quantifying it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Heterogeneous 200 mm Silicon Nitride Photonics Platform for Visible-to-Near-Infrared Applications via Micro-Transfer Printing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BAAEBDQE

@misc{pith2026260802037,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Heterogeneous 200 mm Silicon Nitride Photonics Platform for Visible-to-Near-Infrared Applications via Micro-Transfer Printing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BAAEBDQE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02037}
}
abstract

The commercialization of next-generation technologies, including optical interconnects, quantum computing, AR/VR, and medical diagnostics, requires a low-loss photonic platform offering compact, multifunctional systems in the visible and near-infrared range. Although silicon nitride (SiN) is an excellent material due to its ultra-low loss and broad transparency window, integrating active components such as light sources, modulators and photodetectors from diverse material platforms in a scalable, reliable way remains challenging. Micro-transfer printing is an emerging wafer-scale heterogeneous integration technology that can be implemented as a back-end post-processing step without disrupting the primary in-line fabrication process. In this work, we present a dual LPCVD SiN layer platform fabricated in a 200 mm CMOS pilot line, that incorporates micro-transfer printing modules, allowing the integration of active components on well defined recesses. A hydrogenated amorphous silicon layer is also available to increase the versatility of the platform allowing for evanescently-coupled III-V lasers as well as other passive functionality in the near-infrared region. We report full wafer-scale measurements showing low optical SiN losses of 4 dB/cm and 0.23 dB/cm at a wavelength of 488 nm and 940 nm respectively. In addition, a transition loss of only 0.35 dB is obtained from the SiN to the a-Si:H layer, in good agreement with simulated values. Finally, to showcase more advanced functionality, GaAs-based gain sections are micro-transfer printed on several dies, achieving consistent die-to-die lasing at 970 nm with on-chip optical powers of approximately 1 mW. These results showcase the potential of the integrated photonics platform towards unlocking a wide range of new applications in the sub-1-$\mu$m spectral region.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02037 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Envisioned SiN platform offering a diverse active-passive library. The central schematic shows the conceptual integration layout, surrounded by optical microscope images of micro-transfer printed devices from ongoing developments. These include GaAs-based NIR and red lasers based on evanescent￾coupling and butt-coupling, respectively, silicon photodetectors, thin-film LN high-speed modulators, and cyan- or blue-emit… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dual-layer SiN platform design and material characterization. (a) Ellipsometry measurements of the refractive index and extinction coefficient for the deposited SiN and a-Si:H recipes. (b-c) Simulated modal birefringence versus waveguide cross-sectional dimensions at wavelengths of 488 nm and 940 nm. The solid green curve defines the single-mode per polarization cutoff boundary (below which only the fundamental TE0 … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Process flow for the fabrication of the platform. (a) 200 mm Si wafers. (b) Deposition of 2.9 µm bottom oxide cladding via thermal oxidation and HDP-CVD. (c-e) Deposition of the first 150 nm LPCVD SiN layer, etching and planarization. (f) Deposition of the second 150 nm LPCVD SiN layer. (g-i) Partial etching of the top SiN layer to obtain 60 nm thickness, followed by full etching and planarization. (j-m) Deposition … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Processing variation of the deposited bottom oxide cladding and the dual-layer SiN across several wafers. (b) Colour-map showing the thickness distribution across the wafer for the nominal 220 nm thick a-Si:H layer. (c) Cross-sectional SEM of the dual-layer SiN (fa…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Wafer-scale propagation loss measurement of 150 nm thick SiN at a wavelength of 488 nm. (b-e) Wafer-scale performance characterization at a wavelength of 940 nm. (b) Propagation loss mea￾surement of 300 nm thick SiN. (c) Propagation loss measurement of 220 nm thick…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Process flow for the heterogeneous integration of amplifiers. (i) The passive waveg￾uide platform following fabrication and dicing. (ii) Spin-coating of an adhesive BCB bonding layer. (iii) GaAs-based amplifiers micro-transfer printed onto the a-Si:H waveguides. (i…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Di Liang and John E. Bowers. Recent Progress in Heterogeneous III-V-on-Silicon Photonic Integration.Light: Advanced Manufacturing, 2(1):59, 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    Bowers, Michael Hochberg, Richard Soref, and Bhavin J

    Sudip Shekhar, Wim Bogaerts, Lukas Chrostowski, John E. Bowers, Michael Hochberg, Richard Soref, and Bhavin J. Shastri. Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photon- ics.Nature Communications, 15(1):751, 2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    Integrated photonics enabling ultra-wideband fibre–wireless communication.Nature, 651(8105):348–355, 2026

    Yunhao Zhang, Haowen Shu, Yijun Guo, Peiqi Zhou, Luyu Wang, Jianyang Cai, Liyuan Yao, Linshan Yang, Linze Li, Tianyu Long, Zhouze Zhang, Changhao Han, Kaihang Lu, Yu Sun, Zhaopeng Xu, Jun Qin, Yeyu Tong, Zhixue He, Xi Xiao, Lei Wang, Baile Chen, Shaohua Yu, and Xingjun Wang. Integrated photonics enabling ultra-wideband fibre–wireless communication.Nature,...

    2026

  4. [4]

    Silicon photonics for high-capacity data communications.Photonics Research, 10(9):A106, 2022

    Yaocheng Shi, Yong Zhang, Yating Wan, Yu Yu, Yuguang Zhang, Xiao Hu, Xi Xiao, Hongnan Xu, Long Zhang, and Bingcheng Pan. Silicon photonics for high-capacity data communications.Photonics Research, 10(9):A106, 2022

    2022

  5. [5]

    Poulton, Ami Yaacobi, David B

    Christopher V. Poulton, Ami Yaacobi, David B. Cole, Matthew J. Byrd, Manan Raval, Diedrik Vermeulen, and Michael R. Watts. Coherent solid-state LIDAR with silicon pho- tonic optical phased arrays.Optics Letters, 42(20):4091, 2017

    2017

  6. [6]

    Silicon Photonics Sensors for Biophotonic Applications—A Review.IEEE Sensors Journal, 22(19):18228–18239, 2022

    Chandresh Dhote, Anamika Singh, and Santosh Kumar. Silicon Photonics Sensors for Biophotonic Applications—A Review.IEEE Sensors Journal, 22(19):18228–18239, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Hickman, Min Chul Shin, Peter Topalian, Lei Wang, Dusan Coso, Youmin Wang, Qingjun Wang, Brian Le, Lizzy Lee, Daniel Lopez, Yuhang Wu, Sean Braxton, Alexander Koshelev, Maxwell F

    Zhujun Shi, Risheng Cheng, Guohua Wei, Steven A. Hickman, Min Chul Shin, Peter Topalian, Lei Wang, Dusan Coso, Youmin Wang, Qingjun Wang, Brian Le, Lizzy Lee, Daniel Lopez, Yuhang Wu, Sean Braxton, Alexander Koshelev, Maxwell F. Parsons, Rahul Agarwal, Barry Silverstein, Yun Wang, and Giuseppe Calafiore. Flat-panel laser displays through large-scale photo...

    2025

  8. [8]

    Corsetti, Ashton Hattori, Ethan R

    Sabrina M. Corsetti, Ashton Hattori, Ethan R. Clements, Felix W. Knollmann, Milica Notaros, ReuelSwint, TalSneh, PatrickT.Callahan, GavinN.West, DaveKharas, Thomas 13 Mahony, Colin D. Bruzewicz, Cheryl Sorace-Agaskar, Robert McConnell, Isaac L. Chuang, John Chiaverini, and Jelena Notaros. Integrated-photonics-based systems for polarization- gradient cooli...

    2026

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Newman, Vincent Maurice, Tara Drake, Jordan R

    Zachary L. Newman, Vincent Maurice, Tara Drake, Jordan R. Stone, Travis C. Briles, Daryl T. Spencer, Connor Fredrick, Qing Li, Daron Westly, B. R. Ilic, Boqiang Shen, Myoung-Gyun Suh, Ki Youl Yang, Cort Johnson, David M. S. Johnson, Leo Hollberg, Kerry J. Vahala, Kartik Sriniv...

    2019

  2. [10]

    Hormel, and Yali Jia

    Siyu Song, Tristan T. Hormel, and Yali Jia. Visible-light optical coherence tomography and its applications.Neurophotonics, 12(02), 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Morin, Lin Chang, Warren Jin, Chenlei Li, Joel Guo, Hyundai Park, Minh A

    Theodore J. Morin, Lin Chang, Warren Jin, Chenlei Li, Joel Guo, Hyundai Park, Minh A. Tran, Tin Komljenovic, and John E. Bowers. CMOS-foundry-based blue and violet pho- tonics.Optica, 8(5):755, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Pan, John E

    Yating Wan, William He, James Jaussi, Ling Liao, David Z. Pan, John E. Bowers, and Haisheng Rong. Integrating silicon photonics with complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor technologies.Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering, 3(1):15– 31, 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    Mikkelsen, John N

    Xin Mu, Frank Weiss, Hongyao Chua, Robert Lawrowski, Jared C. Mikkelsen, John N. Straguzzi, Hannes Wahn, Piyush Kumar, Guo-Qiang Lo, Joyce K. S. Poon, Mariel Jama, andWesleyD.Sacher. HybridIntegrationofInGaNLasersinaFoundry-FabricatedVisible- Light Photonics Platform.Nanophoto...

    2026

  6. [14]

    Tran, Chong Zhang, Theodore J

    Minh A. Tran, Chong Zhang, Theodore J. Morin, Lin Chang, Sabyasachi Barik, Zhiquan Yuan, Woonghee Lee, Glenn Kim, Aditya Malik, Zeyu Zhang, Joel Guo, Heming Wang, Boqiang Shen, Lue Wu, Kerry Vahala, John E. Bowers, Hyundai Park, and Tin Komljen- ovic. Extending the spectrum of...

    2022

  7. [15]

    Mikkelsen, Ankita Sharma, Hong Chen, Jason C

    Yiding Lin, Zheng Yong, Xianshu Luo, Saeed Sharif Azadeh, Jared C. Mikkelsen, Ankita Sharma, Hong Chen, Jason C. C. Mak, Patrick Guo-Qiang Lo, Wesley D. Sacher, and Joyce K. S. Poon. Monolithically integrated, broadband, high-efficiency silicon nitride-on- silicon waveguide ph...

    2022

  8. [16]

    Silicon nitride CMOS-compatible platform for integrated photonics applications at visible wavelengths.Optics Express, 21(12):14036, 2013

    Sebastian Romero-García, Florian Merget, Frank Zhong, Hod Finkelstein, and Jeremy Witzens. Silicon nitride CMOS-compatible platform for integrated photonics applications at visible wavelengths.Optics Express, 21(12):14036, 2013

    2013

  9. [17]

    SiN integrated photonic components in the visible to near-infrared spectral region.Optics Express, 32(6):9081, 2024

    Matteo Sanna, Alessio Baldazzi, Gioele Piccoli, Stefano Azzini, Mher Ghulinyan, and Lorenzo Pavesi. SiN integrated photonic components in the visible to near-infrared spectral region.Optics Express, 32(6):9081, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Micro-Transfer Printing on Sili- con Photonics: Tutorial, Recent Progress and Outlook.Journal of Lightwave Technology, pages 1–16, 2026

    Ye Chen, Konstantinos Akritidis, Kai-Wen Chen, Lisa De Jaeger, Jasper De Witte, Ar- turo Fernandez Gamez, Miquel Fausti Cherta Garrido, Max Kiewiet, He Li, Chupao Lin, Krzystof Matuszek, Patrick Nenezic, Margot Niels, Valeria Bonito Oliva, Stijn Poelman, Tom Reep, Lam Thi Ngoc...

    2026

  11. [19]

    Present and future of micro-transfer printing for heterogeneous photonic integrated circuits

    Gunther Roelkens, Jing Zhang, Laurens Bogaert, Emadreza Soltanian, Maximilien Billet, Ali Uzun, Biwei Pan, Yang Liu, Evangelia Delli, Dongbo Wang, Valeria Bonito Oliva, Lam Thi Ngoc Tran, Xin Guo, He Li, Senbiao Qin, Konstantinos Akritidis, Ye Chen, Yu Xue, Margot Niels, Denni...

    2024

  12. [20]

    1.1-cm-long thin-film lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulator with low driving voltage integrated by micro-transfer printing.Optics Express, 33(18):38258, 2025

    Toshiya Murai, Rai Kou, Guangwei Cong, Masahiko Imai, Kazumasa Takabayashi, and Koji Yamada. 1.1-cm-long thin-film lithium niobate Mach-Zehnder modulator with low driving voltage integrated by micro-transfer printing.Optics Express, 33(18):38258, 2025

    2025

  13. [21]

    Bommer, Christopher Panuski, Benoit Guilhabert, Zhongyi Xia, Jack A

    Sean P. Bommer, Christopher Panuski, Benoit Guilhabert, Zhongyi Xia, Jack A. Smith, Martin D. Dawson, Dirk Englund, and Michael J. Strain. Transfer printing micro-assembly of silicon photonic crystal cavity arrays: beating the fabrication tolerance limit.Nature Communications,...

    2025

  14. [22]

    Micro-transfer-printed III-V-on-silicon C-band distributed feedback lasers.Optics Express, 28(22):32793, 2020

    Bahawal Haq, Javad Rahimi Vaskasi, Jing Zhang, Agnieszka Gocalinska, Emanuele Peluc- chi, Brian Corbett, and Gunther Roelkens. Micro-transfer-printed III-V-on-silicon C-band distributed feedback lasers.Optics Express, 28(22):32793, 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    A high-speed heterogeneous lithium tantalate silicon photonics platform.Nature Photonics, 20(2):225–231, 2026

    Margot Niels, Tom Vanackere, Ewoud Vissers, Tingting Zhai, Patrick Nenezic, Jakob De- clercq, Cédric Bruynsteen, Shengpu Niu, Arno Moerman, Olivier Caytan, Nishant Singh, Sam Lemey, Xin Yin, Sofie Janssen, Peter Verheyen, Neha Singh, Dieter Bode, Martin Davi, Filippo Ferraro, ...

    2026

  16. [24]

    Micro-Transfer Printed Continuous-Wave and Mode-Locked Laser Integra- tion at 800 nm on a Silicon Nitride Platform.Laser & Photonics Reviews, 20(7):e00956, 2026

    Max Kiewiet, Stijn Cuyvers, Maximilien Billet, Konstantinos Akritidis, Valeria Bonito Oliva, Gaudhaman Jeevanandam, Sandeep Saseendran, Manuel Reza, Pol Van Dorpe, Roelof Jansen, Joost Brouckaert, Günther Roelkens, Kasper Van Gasse, and Bart Kuyken. Micro-Transfer Printed Cont...

    2026

  17. [25]

    ElectrochemicalEtchingforSeamlessMicro-TransferPrintingofInGaN LEDs.ACS Applied Electronic Materials, 7(11):4814–4821, 2025

    Mikołaj Chlipała, Konstantinos Akritidis, Iryna Levchenko, Krzysztof Gibasiewicz, Tara Brstilo, Maximilien Billet, Pol Van Dorpe, Natalia Fiuczek, Marta Sawicka, Bart Kuyken, andHenrykTurski. ElectrochemicalEtchingforSeamlessMicro-TransferPrintingofInGaN LEDs.ACS Applied Elect...

    2025

  18. [26]

    Tomm, Mathias Ziegler, Thomas Elsaesser, Nicolas Michel, and Michel Krakowski

    Martin Hempel, Jens W. Tomm, Mathias Ziegler, Thomas Elsaesser, Nicolas Michel, and Michel Krakowski. Catastrophic optical damage at front and rear facets of diode lasers. Applied Physics Letters, 97(23):231101, 2010

    2010

  19. [27]

    New mechanisms of cavity facet degradation for GaN-based laser diodes.Journal of Applied Physics, 129(22):223106, 2021

    Xiao-Wei Wang, Zong-Shun Liu, De-Gang Zhao, Ping Chen, Feng Liang, and Jing Yang. New mechanisms of cavity facet degradation for GaN-based laser diodes.Journal of Applied Physics, 129(22):223106, 2021. 15

    2021

  20. [28]

    J.W. Tomm, M. Ziegler, M. Hempel, and T. Elsaesser. Mechanisms and fast kinetics of the catastrophic optical damage (COD) in GaAs-based diode lasers.Laser & Photonics Reviews, 5(3):422–441, 2011

    2011

  21. [29]

    F. R. Nash, R. L. Hartman, N. M. Denkin, and R. W. Dixon. GaAs laser reliability and protective facet coatings.Journal of Applied Physics, 50(5):3122–3132, 1979

    1979

  22. [30]

    Ressel, G

    P. Ressel, G. Erbert, U. Zeimer, K. Hausler, G. Beister, B. Sumpf, A. Klehr, and G. Tran- kle. Novel passivation process for the mirror facets of Al-free active-region high-power semiconductor diode lasers.IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 17(5):962–964, 2005

    2005

  23. [31]

    Stanton, Grant M

    Nima Nader, Eric J. Stanton, Grant M. Brodnik, Nusrat Jahan, Skyler C. Weight, Lin- dell M. Williams, Ali Eshaghian Dorche, Kevin L. Silverman, Sae Woo Nam, Scott B. Papp, and Richard P. Mirin. Heterogeneous tantala photonic integrated circuits for sub-micron wavelength applic...

    2025

  24. [32]

    Akritidis, M

    K. Akritidis, M. Billet, M. Kiewiet, J.-P. Koester, J. Fricke, P. Della Casa, H. Wenzel, J. Brouckaert, R. Jansen, G. Roelkens, M. Weyers, P. Van Dorpe, and B. Kuyken. Hetero- geneously integrated evanescently coupled lasers emitting in the submicrometre wavelength range.APL P...

    2026

  25. [33]

    Amorphous-silicon visible-light detector integrated on silicon nitride waveguides.Optics Letters, 47(10):2598, 2022

    ChristianDeVita, FabioToso, NataleGiovanniPruiti, CharalambosKlitis, GiorgioFerrari, Marc Sorel, Andrea Melloni, and Francesco Morichetti. Amorphous-silicon visible-light detector integrated on silicon nitride waveguides.Optics Letters, 47(10):2598, 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Design and Fabrication of Transfer-Printable Evanescently Coupled GaAs-Based Amplifier Coupons

    Jan-Philipp Koester, Jörg Fricke, Hans Wenzel, Pietro Della Casa, Konstantinos Akritidis, Maximilien Billet, Max Kiewiet, Joost Brouckaert, Pol Van Dorpe, Bart Kuyken, Andrea Knigge, and Markus Weyers. Design and Fabrication of Transfer-Printable Evanescently Coupled GaAs-Base...

    2025

  27. [35]

    Micro-transfer print- ing of lithium niobate on 200 mm silicon photonics: A high-speed heterogeneous wafer-scale platform, 2026

    Xiujun Zheng, Suzanne Bisschop, Arno Moerman, Margot Niels, Ewoud Vissers, Athina Papadopoulou, Philip Ekkels, Patrick Nenezic, Simone Atzeni, Elif Ozceri, Tiernan Mc- Caughery, Ali Uzun, Ye Chen, Laurens Bogaert, Nishant Singh, Sandeep Seema Saseen- dran, Sofie Janssen, Natar...

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.