Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 24 references

1+1d Lattice Dirac Fermions from Non-Onsite Vector and Axial Symmetries

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A lattice model with exact vector and axial U(1) symmetries realizes a single 1+1d Dirac fermion when U0/J0=1/(16π²), with the axial symmetry acting non-onsite.

desk verdict The exact Villain Hamiltonian is plausible and the sector solution works, but the claimed disentangler to a local tensor-product Hilbert space does not map the kinetic term as stated—so a central equivalence is unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02722 v1 pith:5GSZBVD4 submitted 2026-08-03 cond-mat.str-el

Tabin Dharanikota , Lukasz Fidkowski This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Diracfermiononthelatticenon-onsitesymmetryfermionicVillainmodeldisentanglerLuttingerliquidexactsolvabilityvectorandaxialU(1)bosonization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs an exactly solvable lattice Hamiltonian that claims to realize a single 1+1d Dirac fermion at low energies with exact vector and axial U(1) symmetries. The mixed anomaly between the two symmetries is accommodated by making the axial symmetry act not-on-site, in line with the obstructions that prevent naive free-fermion lattice regularization. The Hilbert space is a Z2-graded tensor product of local graded spaces containing Majorana fermions and rotor degrees of freedom, and after a locality-preserving 'Villain disentangler' map the Hamiltonian becomes a solvable system of harmonic oscillators with carefully separated winding sectors. At the tuning U0/J0=1/(16π²), states with half-odd axial charge have odd fermion parity, which is exactly the Dirac-fermion structure expected from continuum bosonization. A reader should care because the model provides an exactly solvable lattice setting where chiral fermion operators can be studied, and it extends directly to interacting Luttinger liquids.

What carries the argument

The construction turns on three linked objects. The first is the fermionic Villain condition (2), which ties the dual shift exp(1/2 d/dφ_r) exp(iχ_{r-1,r}-iχ_{r,r+1}) to the Majorana bilinear iγ_r γ'_r. The second is the disentangler C, a locality-preserving algebra isomorphism that maps this non-onsite condition to the onsite constraint iγ_r γ'_r exp(1/2 d/dφ̃_r)=1 in the graded tensor-product Hilbert space, converting the model into a manifestly local fermionic system. The third is the set of dual constraints W_{r,r+1}=iγ'_r γ_{r+1} exp(2πi n_{r,r+1}), fixed to W=1 except for one W=-1, which enforces exp(πi Q_A)=(-1)^F and makes the odd-winding states fermionic. Together these reduce the dynamics to coupled oscillators in each axial-charge sector, with zero modes carrying the winding and charge shifts.

What would settle it

An exact diagonalization of the model on a small odd-N ring could settle the main claim: the spectrum should organize into oscillator towers whose Q_A=0 tower has even fermion parity and whose Q_A=1/2 tower has odd fermion parity, with the ratio of the single-mover energy to the two-particle energy equal to 1/2 at U0/J0=1/(16π²). A direct check of the disentangler would be to verify, in a finite-dimensional truncation, that the image of the fermionic Villain condition (2) under C equals the onsite constraint (3) on all local generators.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Hamiltonian H = (1/2) Σ_r [ -U0 d²/dφ_r² + J0 (φ_{r+1}-φ_r-n_{r,r+1})² ] + V(W_{0,N-1} - Σ_{r=0}^{N-2} W_{r,r+1}), subject to the fermionic Villain condition and the dual constraints W_{r,r+1}=±1, is exactly solvable and, at U0/J0=1/(16π²), flows to a free Dirac fermion. The effective low-energy theory is a single compact boson whose zero-winding sector is even under fermion parity and whose half-odd-winding sectors are odd; the chiral movers built by shifting the zero modes are exactly the single-fermion excitations of the Dirac theory. Away from the free point the same construction gives exactly solved interacting fermionic Luttinger liquids. At the free point the leading irrelevant corrections come from the nonlinear boson dispersion, and the paper computes their coefficient by matching the short-time scattering amplitude in the Villain model to that of the unique dimension-4 single-chirality fermion interaction.

Load-bearing premise

The construction depends on the fermionic Villain disentangler C being an exact locality-preserving algebra isomorphism that maps the Villain condition to the onsite constraint; the paper adapts this from the bosonic case in [6] and sketches it informally in Section 2, and if the map introduces nonlocality or misidentifies constraint images, the model ceases to be a local fermionic system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At U0/J0=1/(16π²) the model has a single Dirac fermion as its low-energy theory, with exact (U(1)_V × U(1)_A)/Z2 symmetry and the axial symmetry acting non-onsite.
  • Tuning U0/J0 away from the free point gives an exactly solvable realization of the entire interacting Luttinger liquid universality class, not just its free limit.
  • Chiral-fermion operators can be written down: the fully nonlocal F†_L and F†_R shift the zero modes and add charge from the Dirac sea, while operators localized to an interval of length ℓ are approximately chiral with violation ∼ e^{-cℓ/a} at the free point.
  • At the free fixed point the leading irrelevant interaction has scaling dimension 4 and coefficient λ = a³√(J0U0)/(48π), computed by matching field-theoretic and Villain scattering amplitudes.
  • Both periodic and anti-periodic fermion boundary conditions arise naturally; the anti-periodic translation operator satisfies T_AP^N = (-1)^F.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction suggests a general recipe for exact lattice chiral fermions: start from any exactly solvable bosonic model with a dual not-on-site symmetry, and fermionize by flipping the parity of the half-integer winding sectors; applying this to anomaly-free subgroups could yield gauged chiral theories.
  • The explicit prediction λ = a³√(J0U0)/(48π) can be tested by exact diagonalization of small odd-N rings: the short-time slope of ⟨ψ̃+|e^{-iHt}|ψ̃-⟩ should match this value with no fitting parameter.
  • Because the Hamiltonian is solved exactly in every axial-charge sector, the model gives finite-size spectra for interacting Luttinger liquids, which could be used to extract the Luttinger parameter directly from lattice data and benchmark bosonization where conventional approximations fail.
  • The localization result suggests a quantitative trade-off between support length, chirality error, and interaction strength; one could attempt to prove that finite-support operators with chiral quantum numbers have a chirality error bounded below by a decreasing function of the Luttinger parameter, a statement the paper only demonstrates at the free point.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a 1+1d lattice Hamiltonian on a fermionic Villain Hilbert space containing Majorana fermions, real scalar fields, and half-integer edge variables. A fermionic Villain constraint is imposed, together with dual W constraints that enforce exp(pi i Q_A)=(-1)^F. The paper shows that in each axial-charge sector the Hamiltonian reduces to coupled harmonic oscillators, with zero-mode periodicities that make half-integer winding sectors fermion-parity odd. It claims that at U0/J0=1/(16 pi^2) the low-energy theory is a free Dirac fermion with exact, non-onsite U(1)_V and U(1)_A symmetries, that a Jordan-Wigner-like map gives a lattice version of bosonization, and that the leading irrelevant chiral interaction can be computed by comparing a short-time mixing amplitude in the field theory with the corresponding lattice amplitude.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper would provide an important example of an exactly solvable lattice Hamiltonian with exact vector and axial symmetries whose low-energy sector is a single Dirac fermion, thereby giving a new perspective on lattice chiral fermion constructions. The harmonic-oscillator sector analysis is explicit and reproducible, the treatment of translation and constraint operators is careful, and the paper makes a concrete quantitative prediction for the leading irrelevant interaction. These are genuine strengths. However, the Hilbert-space equivalence that underlies the paper's headline claim of a local graded-tensor-product fermionic system is not established in the manuscript, and the comparison that fixes the interaction coefficient is schematic. The underlying exact solvability in the Villain variables appears plausible and is valuable even if the disentangler issue requires substantial revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2, 'Fermionic Villain disentangler'] The explicit definition of the disentangler C is inconsistent with the claimed action on the algebra generators. From the wavefunction action (C Psi)(phi,n)=Psi(phi,n-1/2 floor(2 d phi)), a direct computation gives C (d/dphi_r) C^{-1} = d/d~phi_r + (derivative of -1/2 floor(2 d phi) with respect to phi_r) times d/d~n on the adjacent edges. The generator list in Sec. 2 maps d/dphi_r to d/d~phi_r without this second, singular term. Consequently the image of the kinetic term -U0/2 sum d^2/dphi_r^2 is not the claimed local quadratic operator, and the asserted locality-preserving isomorphism between the Villain Hilbert space and the graded tensor product Hilbert space is unproven. This point is load-bearing because the abstract and introduction state that the Hilbert space is a Z2-graded tensor product of local factors; without a correct C this statement is unsupported.
  2. [Sec. 4, tuning of U0/J0] The value U0/J0=1/(16 pi^2) is obtained by requiring that the ratio of the single-chiral-mover energy to the pair energy reproduce the free-fermion ratio of scaling dimensions of psi_L and psi_L psi_R. This is a calibration of the parameter against the expected answer, not a derivation of the free Dirac point from the lattice data. The sentence 'this is then, at low energies, precisely a Dirac fermion' therefore overstates what has been shown. Since the exact solution gives the full spectrum, a stronger and feasible check would be to compare all low-lying energies and zero-mode quantum numbers with the free Dirac spectrum after fixing the ratio; such a check is not presented.
  3. [Sec. 7, comparison of lattice and field-theory amplitudes] The matching that yields Eq. (41) identifies the lattice oscillator modes B_n in Eq. (37) with the chiral field-theory modes b_n in Eq. (26). The lattice modes are normal modes of the real scalar field and contain both chiralities, whereas b_n is defined for a single chirality. The factor 1/2 in Eq. (38) and the overall normalization connecting the two amplitudes are not derived. Without a precise, justified map between the lattice harmonic oscillators and the chiral bosonic modes of the field theory, the predicted coefficient lambda= a^3/(48 pi) sqrt(J0 U0) is not reliable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2)] The fermionic Villain condition is displayed as an operator without an explicit '=1'; the text should state the condition explicitly to avoid ambiguity.
  2. [Sec. 2, after the formal generator list] The sentence 'except d phi - n' appears to be a typo; it should refer to the second generator, phi_{r+1}-phi_r-n_{r,r+1}, rather than to a derivative.
  3. [Sec. 5] The paper states that F^dagger_L and F^dagger_R map eigenstates to eigenstates and satisfy the displayed translation identities, but it does not explicitly verify that these operators are well defined on the constrained Hilbert space and commute with the dual W constraints. A short verification would improve the exposition.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption says the constraint is imposed, but it does not mention that the dual W constraints are also part of the physical Hilbert space; adding this would make the figure self-contained.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Local-fermion tensor-product claim is imported from a coauthored 'Villain disentangler' preprint, and the free-Dirac value of U0/J0 is calibrated to the target CFT dimension ratio rather than predicted.

  1. self citation load bearing [§2, 'Fermionic Villain disentangler' paragraph (between Eqs. (2) and (3))]
    "These two presentations of the Hilbert space are related by a locality-preserving algebra automorphism, which we call the ‘Villain disentangler’ [6], because it maps the fermionic Villain condition above to the onsite constraint iγ_rγ'_r exp(1/2 d/d~φ_r)=1. ... In fact, this is just the Villain disentangler of [6], with φ,n rescaled by a factor of 2. As shown there, this maps ... and hence maps the Villain condition (eq. 2) to the constraint in the tensor product Hilbert space (eq. 3)."

    The paper's advertised Hilbert space — a Z2-graded tensor product of local graded Hilbert spaces — is the load-bearing premise that lets the authors call the constrained model a local fermionic system. That premise is not proved here; it is delegated to ref. [6], which shares an author with the present paper ('As shown there'). The informal definition C|φ,n⟩=|φ,n−1/2⌊2dφ⌉⟩ given in the same section is not itself a proof: conjugating d/dφ_r through this C produces extra δ-function terms from differentiating the floor function, and the image of the Villain constraint under the listed generator map still contains exp(i~χ) factors, so the claimed equivalence to eq. (3) is not exhibited. The central locality claim therefore reduces to an unverified self-citation.

  2. fitted input called prediction [§4, 'Odd non-zero axial charge' paragraph (ratio calculation) and §5 opening]
    "comparing the energy of a single chiral mover to a pair of counter-propagating fermions allows us to fix this ratio. Indeed, for free fermions and large N we expect this ratio to reproduce the ratio of scaling dimensions of the corresponding fields ψ_L and ψ_Lψ_R. The former has dimension 1/2 and the latter has dimension 1 at the free Dirac fixed point. ... This value of U0/J0 will be crucial in ensuring that the operators F†_{L/R} we write down in the next section are chiral"

    The free-Dirac value U0/J0=1/(16π²) is obtained by imposing that the model's energy ratio equals the free-fermion CFT dimension ratio (1/2)/(1) = 1/2. The subsequent claims that this is the free Dirac fixed point and that F†_{L/R} are chiral ('crucial in ensuring') are consequences of that imposed condition, not independent outputs. The tuning is transparent, but the 'prediction' of a Dirac fermion is built into the parameter choice: the target dimension ratio is an input, and the chiral property is a restatement of the calibration.

full rationale

The exact solvability analysis in §4 works directly in the Villain variables and is largely self-contained: the sector decomposition, the free-boson spectrum, the fermion-parity assignments of odd winding sectors, and the leading irrelevant-interaction coefficient λ in §7 are genuine lattice computations rather than restatements of inputs. Those parts are not circular. However, the abstract's central claim that the Hilbert space is a Z2-graded tensor product of local graded Hilbert spaces depends on the 'Villain disentangler' C, which is imported verbatim from ref. [6], a coauthored preprint, with no independent proof in this paper; the informal definition supplied does not by itself demonstrate the claimed generator mapping, making this a load-bearing self-citation. In addition, the free-Dirac fixed point is not predicted: U0/J0 is fixed by requiring the single-mover/pair energy ratio to equal the known free-fermion scaling-dimension ratio 1/2, and the chirality of F† is then explicitly attributed to that chosen value. Thus the advertised Dirac-fermion realization is partially an input calibration, while the exact spectrum and λ calculation retain independent content. On balance this is partial circularity, not a fully forced derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on three categories of input: the bosonic Villain construction and its disentangler from the cited literature, the continuum bosonization dictionary used to identify the free Dirac point and to calibrate the irrelevant interaction, and structural assumptions about the W constraints and gauge fixing. None of these are fully re-derived inside the paper. The rotors are auxiliary, not physical entities. No external falsifiable prediction is made.

free parameters (2)
  • U0/J0 at the free Dirac fixed point = 1/(16π²)
    In §4 the ratio is fixed by requiring the ratio of energies of a single chiral mover and a counter-propagating pair to match the free-Dirac scaling dimensions 1/2 and 1 from continuum bosonization. Tuning this ratio is what selects the free Dirac point; away from it the model is a generic Luttinger liquid.
  • V (constraint energy scale)
    Introduced in Eq. 13 as a large energy scale to energetically enforce the W constraints; its value does not affect the low-energy solution but is a model parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The bosonic modified Villain model of refs. [4,6] is exactly solvable and admits a locality-preserving disentangler.
    The fermionic construction inherits exact solvability and the disentangler C from these references; C is only informally defined here.
  • domain assumption The Villain disentangler C maps the fermionic Villain condition (Eq. 2) to the local constraint (Eq. 3) and preserves the local operator algebra.
    This is the load-bearing Hilbert space equivalence; ref. [6] establishes it for the bosonic case, and the fermionic case is stated without a complete proof.
  • standard math Continuum bosonization dictionary: chiral fermion fields have scaling dimension 1/2 and the operator ψ_L ψ_R has dimension 1 at the free Dirac point.
    Used in §4 to fix U0/J0 and in §7 to identify the dimension-4 irrelevant interaction.
  • domain assumption The dual W constraints commute with the Villain constraints and with the harmonic terms, and can be energetically enforced.
    Sections 3 and 4 assert these properties; they are needed for exact solvability and are not fully derived in the paper.
invented entities (1)
  • Infinite-dimensional rotor degrees of freedom (φ̃_r, ñ_r,r+1)
    purpose: Enlarge the Hilbert space so that U(1)_A acts non-onsite while retaining exact symmetries and exact solvability.
    These are auxiliary bosonic and rotor variables, not claimed to be physical; no falsifiable prediction is attached to them.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 1+1d Lattice Dirac Fermions from Non-Onsite Vector and Axial Symmetries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5GSZBVD4

@misc{pith2026260802722,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 1+1d Lattice Dirac Fermions from Non-Onsite Vector and Axial Symmetries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5GSZBVD4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02722}
}
abstract

We construct an exactly solvable Hamiltonian lattice model realizing a 1+1d Dirac fermion, with exact microscopic vector and axial vector $U(1)$ symmetries. The mixed anomaly between these is accommodated by the not-on-site action of the symmetries. Our Hilbert space is a $Z_2$-graded tensor product of local $Z_2$-graded Hilbert spaces which include infinite dimensional rotor degrees of freedom. The Hamiltonian becomes manifestly exactly solvable after a locality-preserving unitary mapping to an equivalent fermionic Villain Hilbert space. Our construction also allows an exactly solvable realization of interacting fermionic Luttinger liquids. At the free Dirac fixed point, our Hamiltonian contains irrelevant interactions, which we compute to leading order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02722 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Degrees of freedom of the fermionic Villain model. The bosonic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories from Symmetry Disentanglers, June 2026

    Ryan Thorngren, John Preskill, and Lukasz Fidkowski. Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories from Symmetry Disentanglers, June 2026. arXiv:2601.04304 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  2. [1]

    Bosonization for Beginners — Refermionization for Experts.Annalen der Physik, 510(4):225–305, Novem- ber 1998

    Jan von Delft and Herbert Schoeller. Bosonization for Beginners — Refermionization for Experts.Annalen der Physik, 510(4):225–305, Novem- ber 1998. arXiv:cond-mat/9805275

    arXiv 1998

  3. [2]

    World Scientific, 1994

    Michael Stone, editor.Bosonization. World Scientific, 1994

    work page 1994

  4. [3]

    S´ en´ echal

    D. S´ en´ echal. An Introduction to Bosonization. In David S´ en´ echal, Andr´ e- Marie Tremblay, and Claude Bourbonnais, editors,Theoretical Methods for Strongly Correlated Electrons, pages 139–186. Springer, New York, NY, 2004. 19

    work page 2004

  5. [4]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems.SciPost Physics, 15(2):051, August 2023

    Meng Cheng and Nathan Seiberg. Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems.SciPost Physics, 15(2):051, August 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [5]

    Exactly Solvable 1+1d Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories, July 2026

    Sahand Seifnashri. Exactly Solvable 1+1d Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories, July 2026. arXiv:2601.14359 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Non-invertible bosonic chiral symmetry on the lattice, October 2025

    Lukasz Fidkowski, Cenke Xu, and Carolyn Zhang. Non-invertible bosonic chiral symmetry on the lattice, October 2025. arXiv:2510.17969 [cond- mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Lattice chiral symmetry from bosons in 3+1d, April 2026

    Zhiyao Lu, Sahand Seifnashri, and Shu-Heng Shao. Lattice chiral symmetry from bosons in 3+1d, April 2026. arXiv:2604.06307 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

Show all 24 references
  1. [9]

    J. Villain. Theory of one- and two-dimensional magnets with an easy mag- netization plane. II. The planar, classical, two-dimensional magnet.Journal de Physique, 36(6):581–590, June 1975

    1975

  2. [10]

    Abelian gauge theories on the lattice:θ-Terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles.Nuclear Physics B, 943:114616, June 2019

    Tin Sulejmanpasic and Christof Gattringer. Abelian gauge theories on the lattice:θ-Terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles.Nuclear Physics B, 943:114616, June 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    A Modified Villain Formulation of Fractons and Other Exotic Theo- ries.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 62(10):102301, October 2021

    Pranay Gorantla, Ho Tat Lam, Nathan Seiberg, and Shu-Heng Shao. A Modified Villain Formulation of Fractons and Other Exotic Theo- ries.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 62(10):102301, October 2021. arXiv:2103.01257 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bosoniza- tion versus the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem, July 2026

    Saif Ullah Baig, Shi Chen, Aleksey Cherman, and Maria Neuzil. Bosoniza- tion versus the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem, July 2026. arXiv:2607.09935 [hep-th]

    2026 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Lattice quantum Villain Hamiltoni- ans: compact scalars, U(1) gauge theories, fracton models and quantum Ising model dualities.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023(5):17, May 2023

    Lucca Fazza and Tin Sulejmanpasic. Lattice quantum Villain Hamiltoni- ans: compact scalars, U(1) gauge theories, fracton models and quantum Ising model dualities.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023(5):17, May 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya. A no-go theorem for regularizing chiral fermions.Physics Letters B, 105(2):219–223, October 1981

    1981

  7. [15]

    Pace, and Shu-Heng Shao

    Arkya Chatterjee, Salvatore D. Pace, and Shu-Heng Shao. Quantized ax- ial charge of staggered fermions and the chiral anomaly.Physical Review Letters, 134(2), January 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    D. B. Kaplan. A Method for Simulating Chiral Fermions on the Lattice. Physics Letters B, 288(3-4):342–347, August 1992. arXiv:hep-lat/9206013. 20

    1992 arXiv

  9. [17]

    David B. Kaplan. Chiral Symmetry and Lattice Fermions, January 2012. arXiv:0912.2560 [hep-lat]

    2012 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Chiral gauge theories on the lattice.Nu- clear Physics B, 268(1):179–208, April 1986

    Estia Eichten and John Preskill. Chiral gauge theories on the lattice.Nu- clear Physics B, 268(1):179–208, April 1986

    1986

  11. [19]

    Solution to the 1 + 1 dimensional gauged chiral Fermion problem.Physical Review D, 99(11):111501, June 2019

    Juven Wang and Xiao-Gang Wen. Solution to the 1 + 1 dimensional gauged chiral Fermion problem.Physical Review D, 99(11):111501, June 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Juven Wang and Xiao-Gang Wen. Non-Perturbative Regularization of 1+1D Anomaly-Free Chiral Fermions and Bosons: On the equivalence of anomaly matching conditions and boundary gapping rules.Physical Review B, 107(1):014311, January 2023. arXiv:1307.7480 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Symmetric Mass Generation.Symmetry, 14(7):1475, July 2022

    Juven Wang and Yi-Zhuang You. Symmetric Mass Generation.Symmetry, 14(7):1475, July 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Exact lattice chiral symmetry in 2D gauge theory.Physical Review D, 110(1):014510, July 2024

    Evan Berkowitz, Aleksey Cherman, and Theodore Jacobson. Exact lattice chiral symmetry in 2D gauge theory.Physical Review D, 110(1):014510, July 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    A Lattice Chiral Boson Theory in$1+1$d, May 2023

    Michael DeMarco, Ethan Lake, and Xiao-Gang Wen. A Lattice Chiral Boson Theory in$1+1$d, May 2023. arXiv:2305.03024 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Symmetric Mass Generation in the 1 + 1 Dimensional Chiral Fermion 3-4-5-0 Model

    Meng Zeng, Zheng Zhu, Juven Wang, and Yi-Zhuang You. Symmetric Mass Generation in the 1 + 1 Dimensional Chiral Fermion 3-4-5-0 Model. Physical Review Letters, 128(18):185301, May 2022. 21

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.