Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 227 references

Tracing luminous infrared galaxy populations through cluster evolution in a cosmological mock redshift survey

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A 100-square-degree mock survey of dusty star-forming galaxies reproduces observed millimeter counts and predicts that proto-clusters of rich clusters contract from roughly 22 comoving Mpc at $z\sim5.5$ to about 5.3 comoving Mpc at…

desk verdict A genuinely useful public mock catalogue and TolTEC forecasts, but the headline z>4 star-forming fraction trend rests on a quenching model calibrated only to z<=4 and needs to be flagged as extrapolation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02898 v1 pith:6IQRM53G submitted 2026-08-03 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords dustystar-forminggalaxiesproto-clustersgalaxyclusterassemblysubmillimetrenumbercountssemi-empiricalgalaxy-halomodelmockredshiftsurveyTolTECpredictionsULIRGs
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents GARDENS-Wide, a 100 square degree mock redshift survey of dusty star-forming galaxies built by assigning galaxies to dark-matter halos through abundance matching and calibrating their infrared emission. The paper claims that this mock reproduces the observed number counts at 500 $\mu$m, 1.1, 1.4 and 2.0 mm well enough to trust its spatial predictions. Using the mock's merger histories, it claims that proto-clusters of rich clusters contract from roughly 22 comoving Mpc at $z\sim5.5$ to about 5.3 comoving Mpc at $z\sim0$, while star-forming galaxies rise from about 35 percent of members at low redshift to 60\u201365 percent at $z\sim2$ before declining. The payoff would be a concrete, testable map of what wide-area submillimetre surveys should see in and around forming clusters.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a semi-empirical galaxy-halo connection: subhalo abundance matching links halo circular-velocity history to stellar mass, growth histories set star formation rates, an obscured fraction converts part of that into infrared luminosity, and dust temperatures and a grey-body SED with emissivity index $\beta=2.2\pm0.34$ turn luminosities into millimetre fluxes. On top of this, the new analysis relies on merger-tree walking (via the halo finder's UPID\u2013ID hierarchy and consistent tree associations) to collect every progenitor halo of a present-day cluster into a proto-cluster at each epoch, and defines proto-cluster size as the maximum 3D comoving distance from the central halo to its most distant member halo. A point-mass gravitational lensing model with minimum amplification $\mu=1.2$ modifies the bright-end number counts. Together these pieces convert a dark-matter simulation into a population of luminous infrared galaxies whose environments and histories can be counted.

What would settle it

Compare the mock's TolTEC predictions to the real survey: if the median number of 1.1 mm detectable members in $z\sim3.2$ rich-cluster proto-clusters is not near 8, or if the median angular separation of those members is far from the predicted 5\u20136.6 arcmin at $z\sim2\text{--}3.5$, the spatial and luminosity mapping fails. A direct spectroscopic check at $z\sim2$ should find star-forming fractions near 60\u201365 percent, not the 35 percent of low-redshift clusters.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a set of evolutionary trends extracted from the wide-area mock: within the assembly histories of systems that become rich clusters, the median proto-cluster radius, measured as the maximum three-dimensional comoving distance between the central halo and the most distant member, decreases from $\gtrsim20$ comoving Mpc at $z\gtrsim5$ to approximately 5.3 comoving Mpc at $z\sim0$ (the physical radius instead grows to a maximum of about 6.6 Mpc at $z\sim2$ and then contracts). Simultaneously, the median star-forming fraction among members peaks at 60\u201365 percent at $z\sim2$, LIRGs contribute 20\u201340 percent with a similar peak, ULIRGs stay below roughly 10 percent, and HyLIRGs are rarer than 0.5 percent. At $z>1.5$ ULIRGs in rich proto-clusters are centrally concentrated, typically lying within 10\u201365 percent of the proto-cluster radius, and the paper translates these trends into survey predictions: over 60 square degrees the TolTEC Large-Scale Structure survey should detect about 104,000 sources at 1.1 mm, 50,000 at 1.4 mm, and 11,000 at 2.0 mm, with median redshifts of 2.9, 3.1 and 3.3, and with typical separations between detectable proto-cluster members of 5\u20136.6 arcmin at $z\sim2\text{--}3.5$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the semi-empirical model, calibrated on average galaxy populations (stellar mass functions, quiescent fractions, the star-forming main sequence, and luminosity functions), remains valid in rare, massive proto-cluster environments at high redshift where those calibration data have little leverage, with the specific SFRIR cap of 6000 $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ and the chosen dust parameters as part of that same assumption.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Wide-area millimetre surveys should search for proto-clusters as extended structures of a few arcminutes to about 16 arcmin, with search apertures matched to the predicted angular radii.
  • At $z\sim2$, dusty star-forming galaxies are the dominant tracer of cluster assembly, so submillimetre selection is the most efficient route to proto-cluster discovery in that epoch.
  • Most detectable star-forming galaxy pairs at 1.1 mm will be blended (about 64 percent), so flux densities of bright compact pairs will be systematically overestimated unless higher-resolution follow-up is used.
  • TolTEC's sensitivity, not its angular resolution, will limit proto-cluster identification, since typical separations of detectable members are about 5\u20136.6 arcmin, far above the 5-arcsec beam.
  • About 72 proto-clusters of future rich clusters (48 at $z\geq2$, 19 at $z\geq4$) should be identifiable in a 60 square degree survey before any flux cut, providing a sample for studying the assembly of the most massive systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mock is representative, the predicted angular scales imply that a single-dish camera with arcminute mapping capability can outline proto-cluster structure without interferometric follow-up; the resolved members are sparse but well separated.
  • The central concentration of ULIRGs at $z>1.5$ suggests that deep pointed observations of the inner 10\u201365 percent of a proto-cluster radius will recover a disproportionate share of the intense obscured star formation, a strategy the paper does not itself propose.
  • The $z\sim2$ peak in star-forming fraction coincides with the cosmic star-formation peak, hinting that the most massive clusters assemble their star-forming populations just before the main epoch of environmental quenching; this causal reading goes beyond the paper's correlations.
  • The paper's own point-mass lensing model overproduces highly magnified sources, so the predicted bright-end counts and the roughly 300 strongly lensed sources per 60 square degrees are likely upper limits; a more realistic lens population would be a direct test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper presents GARDENS-Wide, a 100 square degree mock redshift survey of dusty star-forming galaxies (DSFGs) built from the MDPL2 N-body simulation, with galaxy populations assigned via subhalo abundance matching and a semi-empirical model for star formation and quenching. The mock includes gravitational lensing and is publicly released. The authors validate the mock against observed number counts at 500 microns, 1.1, 1.4, and 2.0 mm, then use the large area to identify gravitationally bound systems (pairs, groups, poor and rich clusters) and trace their assembly histories through merger trees. They report that star-forming galaxies contribute about 35 per cent of cluster members at low redshift, rising to 60-65 per cent at z~2 and then declining to about 20-30 per cent by z~5; that LIRGs peak at about 20-40 per cent near z~2; that ULIRGs remain subdominant; and that proto-clusters of rich clusters contract from about 22 comoving Mpc at z~5.5 to about 5.3 Mpc at z~0. They also find that ULIRGs become increasingly centrally concentrated at z>1.5, and they provide predictions for the TolTEC Large-Scale Structure survey, including source counts, redshift distributions, detectable galaxy pairs, and proto-cluster member separations.

Significance. If the mock is reliable, it is a valuable community resource: the public catalogue, the wide-area lightcone, and the TolTEC predictions provide concrete, falsifiable expectations for an upcoming survey. The use of a 100 deg^2 volume to identify 32 rich clusters and trace their assembly histories is a genuine advance over smaller-area mocks, and the comparison of proto-cluster SFRD contributions with Chiang et al. (2017) is informative. However, the central astrophysical claims about the redshift evolution of star-forming and IR-luminous populations in cluster progenitors rest on two load-bearing assumptions that are not fully supported: (i) the quenching model is calibrated only at z<=4, yet the headline decline at z>4 is extrapolated; and (ii) the number-count validation at 1.1-2.0 mm is partly circular because the dust emissivity index beta=2.2 was chosen to match those counts. The TolTEC predictions inherit these uncertainties, although the survey-specific predictions (e.g., median redshifts, pair resolution fractions) are less sensitive to the high-z extrapolation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1, Section 4.1, Figures 4-5, Figure 7, Abstract] The predicted decline of the star-forming galaxy fraction to about 20-30 per cent at z>4 is an extrapolation of the galaxy formation model beyond its calibration range. Section 2.1 states that the quiescent fraction is reproduced only for 0<=z<=4, yet Section 4.1 and Figure 7 present star-forming fractions at z up to 5.5-6, and the abstract and conclusions advertise the decline to about 20 per cent by z~5 as a result. The example assembly histories in Figures 4 and 5 show quiescent fractions of about 68 per cent at z=5.60 and 80 per cent at z=5.42, which are in tension with the observed rarity of massive quiescent galaxies at z>4 and with the starburst-dominated nature of known z>4 proto-clusters. Because this trend drives the LIRG/ULIRG fractions at high redshift, it is load-bearing for the central claim. Please either restrict the high-redshift claims to z<4, validate the high-z quiescent fraction against independent data (e.g., deep-field quiescent fractions or confirmed z>4 proto-clusters), or present the high-z decline as an unconstrained extrapolation and quantify its systematic uncertainty.
  2. [Section 2.2, Figure 1] The validation against the 1.1, 1.4, and 2.0 mm number counts is partly circular. The text states that the dust emissivity index beta=2.2 was adopted specifically because it 'provides the best agreement with the observed number counts at 1.1, 1.4, and 2.0 mm.' Therefore the good agreement at those wavelengths in Figure 1 is a fit to the same data, not an independent prediction. This weakens the claim that the mock 'reproduces' the observed counts. Please recast the validation to identify which statistics are genuinely predicted (for example, the 500 micron counts, the redshift distributions, and the TolTEC source-count predictions), and add a sensitivity test showing how the predicted counts vary within the observationally allowed range of beta.
  3. [Abstract, Section 4.1, Section 6] The high-redshift value of the star-forming fraction is reported inconsistently. The abstract and the conclusions state that the fraction declines to about 20 per cent by z~5, while Section 4.1 says it 'gradually declines to about 30 per cent, forming a tail that extends to z~5.5.' This is a load-bearing number in the summary of the paper, so the discrepancy should be corrected and the final value should be reconciled between the abstract and the body.
  4. [Section 4.2, Figure 8] The central spatial claims (contraction of proto-cluster radii and central concentration of LIRGs/ULIRGs) rely on a radius metric defined as the maximum 3D comoving distance from the central halo to the most distant member halo. The robustness test using the mean distance to the three or four most distant members shows differences of up to 40 per cent for the LIRG and ULIRG subpopulations, and the maximum-distance metric is sensitive to outliers and infalling halos. Given that these trends are headline results, the paper should report how the conclusions in Section 4.2 and the TolTEC angular-size predictions change under the alternative radius definitions, and discuss whether the contraction and central-concentration findings are robust.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 1] In the upper-left panel, the legend labels a dataset as 'Ward+22 (317deg2, lensed candidates)', but the reference list contains Ward et al. (2021) and Ward et al. (2024); please correct the year or add the missing reference.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 lists 'Magnification (mu)' with a minimum of 1.2 for both GARDENS-Wide and GARDENS-Deep, but the text in Section 2.2 explains that 1.2 is the minimum amplification for lensed sources only. Please clarify in the table caption that the catalogues include both unlensed (mu=1) and lensed (mu>1.2) populations.
  3. [Section 4.1] The paper reports median fractions with 16th-84th percentiles but does not state how many independent rich clusters contribute to each redshift bin in Figure 7. With only 32 rich clusters in total, the scatter at high redshift may be driven by a handful of systems. Please state the number of independent systems per bin, or add a note about the statistical weight of the median.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

mm number-count agreement is partly fitted via beta, while the main cluster-evolution trends remain independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2.2 (Star-Forming Galaxies and Their Infrared Properties) and Section 2.3 / Figure 1; cf. Abstract]
    "We explored several central values of β, each combined with the same dispersion, and found that β=2.2 provides the best agreement with the observed number counts at 1.1, 1.4, and 2.0 mm. Based on this test, we adopt β=2.2 with σ=0.34 as our fiducial model. ... Our number counts reproduce the observed total counts over a wide range of flux densities."

    The dust emissivity index β is a free parameter of the gray-body SED that directly sets the mm flux densities. The authors explicitly choose β=2.2 because it gives the best agreement with the observed 1.1, 1.4 and 2.0 mm number counts, and then present agreement with those same counts (Figure 1, Abstract) as a successful reproduction/validation of the mock. The match at these wavelengths is therefore at least partly constructed by the parameter choice rather than an independent prediction. The TolTEC LSS source-count predictions in Section 5.1, made at the same wavelengths, inherit this calibration. The cluster-evolution results are based on intrinsic SFR/L_IR from the SHAM/quenching model, so they are not directly forced by this β fit; the circularity is partial.

full rationale

The paper builds GARDENS-Wide from MDPL2 with SHAM-based galaxy assignment and a semi-empirical model calibrated to stellar mass functions, quiescent fractions (0≤z≤4), the main sequence, and UV/IR luminosity functions (Section 2.1). Predicting cluster galaxy content from this calibrated model is not circular: the environment dependence is emergent from the N-body assembly and is not among the calibration targets. The one concrete reduction is the dust SED: Section 2.2 states that β=2.2 was selected because it gives the best agreement with the observed 1.1, 1.4 and 2.0 mm number counts, and Section 2.3/Figure 1 then present agreement with those same counts as a successful reproduction, with the Abstract leading on it. The TolTEC source-count predictions (Section 5.1) are at the same wavelengths and inherit this fitted choice. The proto-cluster size evolution and the redshift dependence of SF/LIRG/ULIRG fractions use intrinsic SFRs and luminosities from the SHAM/quenching model, so they do not reduce to the β fit. The paper itself limits the quiescent-fraction calibration to z≤4, so the reported decline of the star-forming fraction to ~20–30% at z~5 is an extrapolation beyond the calibrated range; the paper's own example proto-clusters are ~68–80% quiescent at z≈5.4–5.6. This is a correctness/robustness concern, not a logical circularity. The 'Rodríguez-Puebla et al., in prep.' reference supplies implementation details but does not by itself make the derivation tautological. Overall, one fitted parameter is presented as validation, giving partial circularity (score 6) despite the independence of the main cluster-evolution claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on a chain of empirically calibrated relations and simulation outputs. The main free parameters are the SED choices, especially beta, which is explicitly fitted to the validation data. The most consequential assumption is that a model calibrated on global luminosity functions and mass functions is valid in rare cluster progenitors.

free parameters (4)
  • Dust emissivity index beta central value = 2.2
    Section 2.2: authors explored several central values and adopted beta=2.2 because it gives the best agreement with observed number counts at 1.1, 1.4 and 2.0 mm.
  • Dust emissivity index dispersion sigma = 0.34
    Section 2.2: drawn from Ward et al. 2024 confidence interval, used as input to the SED model.
  • SFRIR upper cap = 6000 solar masses per year
    Section 2.2: imposed to remove extreme SFRs, motivated by Quirós-Rojas et al. 2024. Affects the bright counts and ULIRG population.
  • Minimum lensing magnification mu = 1.2
    Section 2.2: adopted point-mass lensing model with min amplification 1.2, affects the lensed source counts.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The SHAM galaxy-halo connection with Vpeak-to-stellar-mass matching and the inferred SFRs reproduce the true galaxy population in dense environments.
    Section 2.1: the galaxy model is calibrated to global statistics and then used to make predictions about rare cluster environments without direct environmental calibration.
  • domain assumption The empirical relations for obscured fraction, dust temperature, and SED hold at high redshift and in proto-cluster environments.
    Section 2.2: Whitaker et al. 2017, Dunlop et al. 2017, Casey et al. 2018 are extrapolated to z up to 7 and to overdense regions.
  • domain assumption The MDPL2 simulation and ROCKSTAR/CONSISTENT TREES merger trees correctly represent halo and subhalo evolution.
    Section 3.1: the entire assembly history analysis relies on the fidelity of the halo finder and merger trees.
  • domain assumption The point-mass lensing approximation captures strong lensing statistics well enough for number counts and TolTEC predictions.
    Section 2.2: the paper itself notes this approximation may bias magnification toward high values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tracing luminous infrared galaxy populations through cluster evolution in a cosmological mock redshift survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6IQRM53G

@misc{pith2026260802898,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tracing luminous infrared galaxy populations through cluster evolution in a cosmological mock redshift survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6IQRM53G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02898}
}
abstract

We present GARDENS-Wide, a new 100 square degree mock redshift survey of the dusty star-forming galaxy population based on the MultiDark-Planck 2 dark-matter halo simulation. The mock reproduces observed multiwavelength number counts at 500 $\mu$m, 1.1, 1.4 and 2.0 mm. The large simulated area enables us to identify gravitationally bound systems, trace their assembly histories, and quantify the redshift evolution of their galaxy content and structural extent. We find strong evolution in the fractional contribution of galaxy populations within cluster progenitors. Star-forming galaxies account for ~35 per cent of members at low redshift, increasing to 60-65 per cent at $z\sim2$ and declining to ~20 per cent by $z\sim5$. LIRGs contribute ~20-40 per cent, peaking near $z\sim2$, while ULIRGs remain subdominant and HyLIRGs are rare. We measure proto-cluster radii as the maximum 3D comoving distance from the central halo to the most distant member halo. Proto-clusters contract significantly over cosmic time, from >20 comoving Mpc at high redshift to a few Mpc at $z\sim0$. ULIRGs become increasingly centrally concentrated at $z>1.5$ in rich proto-clusters. We provide observational predictions for the TolTEC Large-Scale Structure survey.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02898 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cumulative number counts at 500 𝜇m, 1.1, 1.4 and 2.0 mm measured within our simulated area of 100 square degrees. Upper left: Total number counts at 500 𝜇m (black solid line), separated into lensed (𝜇 > 1.2, black dashed line) and unlensed (black dotted line) galaxies. These are compared with several large-area surveys at 500 𝜇m (Clements et al. 2010; Planck Collaboration et al. 2013; Wardlow et al. 2012; Valiante e… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Percentage of galaxies in each association category relative to the total number of galaxies within each redshift bin, based on our 100 square degree mock redshift survey. Categories are defined by the number of members: isolated (1), pairs (2), groups (3–10), poor clusters (11–50), and rich clusters (> 50). The dominant population at all redshifts corresponds to isolated galaxies, followed by pairs, small groups, p… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mass distributions of central halos in each category, as identified in our mock survey at all redshifts. The 𝑦-axis shows the percentage of halos in each mass bin relative to the total number in that category (N). The distributions show that isolated halos dominate the low-mass end, while richer associations are progressively shifted toward higher halo masses, highlighting the hierarchical growth of structures [PIT… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Assembly history of the richest cluster in our 100 square degree lightcone across several snapshots. At 𝑧 = 0.576, the main halo has a mass of 2.0 × 1015 M⊙ and contains 122 cluster members. At this redshift, 71 additional progenitor halos that are not yet cluster memb…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top panel: Total cosmic SFRD predicted by our 100 square degrees mock lightcone (solid red line) and by the 5.3 square degrees catalogue of NM24 (solid blue line), compared with the results of Chiang et al. (2017) (solid golden line). The corresponding contributions fr…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Median percentage contribution of star-forming galaxies (blue) and their infrared-bright subpopulations, including LIRGs (yellow), ULIRGs (red), and HyLIRGs (green), to the assembly histories of groups, poor clusters, and rich clusters shown in the three panels. The co…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Median of the maximum distance between the central halo of each proto-cluster and its most distant satellite galaxy at each stage of its evolution, shown as a function of redshift. This quantity traces the spatial extent of the assembling system for rich clusters (>50 …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Median 3D distance between the proto-cluster centre and the 75th-percentile ULIRG (purple and green lines), compared with the distance to the most distant ULIRG (red lines), for proto-clusters whose descendants are rich (top panel) and poor (bottom panel) clusters. Sha…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Redshift distributions for the TolTEC LSS survey (60 square degrees) at 1.1, 1.4, and 2.0 mm, assuming 4𝜎 limits of 1.0, 0.72, and 0.48 mJy beam−1 . Dotted histograms show results from NM24 (5.3 square degrees) with the same flux selection. Vertical lines indicate the…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Distribution of angular distances for galaxy pairs in which both members are star-forming. N denotes the number of pairs. The blue histogram shows all pairs (without any flux limit), while the yellow and red histograms correspond to systems where both galaxies satisfy…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Median number of galaxies detectable in proto-cluster as a func￾tion of redshift at the three TolTEC bands (1.1, 1.4, and 2.0 mm in green, yellow and pink symbols), assuming the LSS 4𝜎 detection limits. Error bars indicate the 16th–84th percentile range. The number of…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Median angular separation between detectable proto-cluster mem￾bers as a function of redshift for systems that evolve into rich clusters. Only galaxies above the TolTEC LSS 4𝜎 detection limit at 1.1 mm are considered. The solid green line shows the median separation, …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

227 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    The Galaxy-Halo/Subhalo Connection: Mass Relations and Implications for Some Satellite Occupational Distributions. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/92 , archivePrefix =. 1302.0005 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    The Stellar-Subhalo Mass Relation of Satellite Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/2 , archivePrefix =. 1204.0804 , primaryClass =

  3. [5]

    Soucail, G. and Fo. The matter distribution in z. A&A , year =

  4. [6]

    , title =

    Abell, George O. , title =. ApJS , year =

  5. [7]

    and Coil, Alison L

    Baxter, Devontae C. and Coil, Alison L. and Nadler, Ethan O. and Nelson, Dylan and Pillepich, Annalisa and Forrest, Ben and Giddings, Finn and Golden-Marx, Emmet and Lemaux, Brian C. and Sikorski, Derek , title =. ApJ , volume =. 2025 , doi =

  6. [9]

    Dusty Star-forming Galaxies in High-redshift Protocluster Environments , journal =

    Araya-Araya, Pablo and Gonz. Dusty Star-forming Galaxies in High-redshift Protocluster Environments , journal =. 2024 , doi =

  7. [10]

    Kato, Yuki and Matsuda, Yuichi and Tamura, Yoichi and Smail, Ian and Swinbank, A. M. and Umehata, Hideki and Kohno, Kotaro and Ivison, R. J. and Hayashino, Takashi and Chapman, Scott C. , title =. ApJ , volume =. 2016 , doi =

  8. [11]

    and Cooray, Asantha and Capak, Peter and Darvish, Behnam and Hung, Chao-Ling and Kartaltepe, Jeyhan and others , title =

    Casey, Caitlin M. and Cooray, Asantha and Capak, Peter and Darvish, Behnam and Hung, Chao-Ling and Kartaltepe, Jeyhan and others , title =. ApJL , volume =. 2015 , doi =

Show all 227 references
  1. [12]

    and Ivison, R

    Oteo, I. and Ivison, R. J. and Dunne, L. and Manilla-Robles, A. and Maddox, S. and Lewis, A. J. R. and de Zotti, G. and Bremer, M. and Clements, D. L. and Cooray, A. and Dannerbauer, H. and Eales, S. and Greenslade, J. and Omont, A. and Perez-Fournon, I. and Riechers, D. and S...

  2. [14]

    and Hatch, Nina A

    Muldrew, Stuart I. and Hatch, Nina A. and Cooke, Elizabeth A. , title =. MNRAS , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2454 , url =

  3. [17]

    and Zitrin, A

    Laporte, N. and Zitrin, A. and Dole, H. and Roberts-Borsani, G. and Furtak, L. J. and Witten, C. , title =. A&A , year =

  4. [20]

    and Lin, Yen-Ting and Dey, Arjun and Eisenhardt, Peter R

    Alberts, Stacey and Pope, Alexandra and Brodwin, Mark and Atlee, David W. and Lin, Yen-Ting and Dey, Arjun and Eisenhardt, Peter R. M. and Gettings, Daniel P. and Gonzalez, Anthony H. and Jannuzi, Buell T. and Mancone, Conor L. and Moustakas, John and Snyder, Gregory F. and St...

  5. [22]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102514 , archivePrefix =. 1103.4829 , primaryClass =

  6. [24]

    ALMA Redshifts of Millimeter-Selected Galaxies from the SPT Survey: The Redshift Distribution of Dusty Star-forming Galaxies , journal =

    Wei. ALMA Redshifts of Millimeter-Selected Galaxies from the SPT Survey: The Redshift Distribution of Dusty Star-forming Galaxies , journal =. 2013 , volume =

  7. [25]

    Vieira, J. D. and Marrone, D. P. and Chapman, S. C. and De Breuck, C. and Hezaveh, Y. D. and Wei. Dusty starburst galaxies in the early Universe as revealed by gravitational lensing , journal =. 2013 , volume =

  8. [27]

    2024 , month =

    Bahk, Hyeonguk and Hwang, Ho Seong , title =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad323f , url =

  9. [30]

    and Furusawa, Hisanori and Ishikawa, Shogo and Onoue, Masafusa and Ota, Kazuaki and Tanaka, Masayuki and Niino, Yuu and Uchiyama, Hisakazu , title =

    Toshikawa, Jun and Kashikawa, Nobunari and Overzier, Roderik and Malkan, Matthew A. and Furusawa, Hisanori and Ishikawa, Shogo and Onoue, Masafusa and Ota, Kazuaki and Tanaka, Masayuki and Niino, Yuu and Uchiyama, Hisakazu , title =. ApJ , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.3847...

  10. [32]

    Stanford, S. A. and Brodwin, M. and Gonzalez, Anthony H. and Zeimann, Greg and Stern, Daniel and Dey, Arjun and Eisenhardt, P. R. and Snyder, Gregory F. and Mancone, C. , title =. ApJ , abstract =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/164 , url =

  11. [33]

    , keywords =

    The Evolution of X-ray Clusters of Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.120401.150547 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0209035 , primaryClass =

  12. [40]

    Casey, C. M. and Berta, S. and Béthermin, M. and Bock, J. and Bridge, C. and Budynkiewicz, J. and Burgarella, D. and Chapin, E. and Chapman, S. C. and Clements, D. L. and Conley, A. and Conselice, C. J. and Cooray, A. and Farrah, D. and Hatziminaoglou, E. and Ivison, R. J. and...

  13. [41]

    Everett, W. B. and Zhang, L. and Crawford, T. M. and Vieira, J. D. and Aravena, M. and Archipley, M. A. and Austermann, J. E. and Benson, B. A. and Bleem, L. E. and Carlstrom, J. E. and Chang, C. L. and Chapman, S. and Crites, A. T. and de Haan, T. and Dobbs, M. A. and George,...

  14. [46]

    and Cooray, Asantha and De Bernardis, Francesco and Amblard, A

    Wardlow, Julie L. and Cooray, Asantha and De Bernardis, Francesco and Amblard, A. and Arumugam, V. and Aussel, H. and Baker, A. J. and Béthermin, M. and Blundell, R. and Bock, J. and Boselli, A. and Bridge, C. and Buat, V. and Burgarella, D. and Bussmann, R. S. and Cabrera-Lav...

  15. [47]

    and Amber, S

    Negrello, M. and Amber, S. and Amvrosiadis, A. and Cai, Z.-Y. and Lapi, A. and Gonzalez-Nuevo, J. and De Zotti, G. and Furlanetto, C. and Maddox, S. J. and Allen, M. and Bakx, T. and Bussmann, R. S. and Cooray, A. and Covone, G. and Danese, L. and Dannerbauer, H. and Fu, H. an...

  16. [49]

    Firmani and V

    C. Firmani and V. Avila-Reese , title =. ApJ , fjournal=. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/755 , url =

  17. [50]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Star-forming and Quiescent Central Galaxies Cluster Similarly: Implications for the Galaxy-Halo Connection. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403.01393 , archivePrefix =. 2403.01393 , primaryClass =

  18. [51]

    , keywords =

    The galaxy H I-(sub)halo connection and the H I spatial clustering of local galaxies. , keywords =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1788 , archivePrefix =. 2106.01973 , primaryClass =

  19. [52]

    , keywords =

    Does the galaxy-halo connection vary with environment?. , keywords =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty283 , archivePrefix =. 1710.09392 , primaryClass =

  20. [53]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The Connection between Galaxies and Dark Matter Structures in the Local Universe. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/771/1/30 , adsurl =

  21. [55]

    A. J. Barger and L. L. Cowie and A. H. Blair and L. H. Jones , title =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac67e7 , url =

  22. [56]

    Magdis and E

    Georgios E. Magdis and E. Daddi and M. Béthermin and M. Sargent and D. Elbaz and M. Pannella and M. Dickinson and H. Dannerbauer and E. da Cunha and F. Walter and D. Rigopoulou and V. Charmandaris and H. S. Hwang and J. Kartaltepe , title =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-63...

  23. [57]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202347048

    Traina, A. and. A3COSMOS: The infrared luminosity function and dust-obscured star formation rate density at 0.5 < z < 6 , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202347048", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347048", journal =. 2024 , volume =

  24. [58]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202037649

    Béthermin, M. and. The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: Data processing, catalogs, and statistical source properties⋆⋆⋆ , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202037649", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037649", journal =. 2020 , volume =

  25. [59]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202243888

    Béthermin, M. and. CONCERTO: High-fidelity simulation of millimeter line emissions of galaxies and [CII] intensity mapping , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202243888", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243888", journal =. 2022 , volume =

  26. [60]

    Hezaveh and Gilbert P

    Yashar D. Hezaveh and Gilbert P. Holder , title =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/52 , url =

  27. [62]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201425017

    The Herschel view of the dominant mode of galaxy growth from z = 4 to the present day⋆⋆⋆ , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201425017", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425017", journal =

  28. [63]

    , keywords =

    Submillimetre-wavelength detection of dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/28338 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9806317 , primaryClass =

  29. [64]

    10.1051/0004-6361/200913634

    Michalowski, M. and. Cosmic evolution of submillimeter galaxies and their contribution to stellar mass assembly* , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/200913634", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913634", journal =

  30. [66]

    da Cunha and F

    E. da Cunha and F. Walter and I. R. Smail and A. M. Swinbank and J. M. Simpson and R. Decarli and J. A. Hodge and A. Weiss and P. P. van der Werf and F. Bertoldi and S. C. Chapman and P. Cox and A. L. R. Danielson and H. Dannerbauer and T. R. Greve and R. J. Ivison and A. Kari...

  31. [67]

    Smail and William D

    Minhee Hyun and Myungshin Im and Ian R. Smail and William D. Cotton and Jack E. Birkin and Satoshi Kikuta and Hyunjin Shim and Christopher N. A. Willmer and James J. Condon and Rogier A. Windhorst and Seth H. Cohen and Rolf A. Jansen and Chun Ly and Yuichi Matsuda and Giovanni...

  32. [68]

    G\'omez-Guijarro, C. and. GOODS-ALMA 2.0: Source catalog, number counts, and prevailing compact sizes in 1.1 mm galaxies , DOI=. A&A , year =

  33. [69]

    Hughes and F

    David H. Hughes and F. Peter Schloerb and Itziar Aretxaga and Edgar Castillo-Dom. Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VIII , editor =. 2020 , doi =

  34. [70]

    Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy X , editor =

    Grant W. Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy X , editor =. 2020 , doi =

  35. [73]

    Stach and Ian Smail and A

    Stuart M. Stach and Ian Smail and A. M. Swinbank and J. M. Simpson and J. E. Geach and Fang Xia An and Omar Almaini and Vinodiran Arumugam and A. W. Blain and S. C. Chapman and Chian-Chou Chen and C. J. Conselice and E. A. Cooke and K. E. K. Coppin and J. S. Dunlop and Duncan ...

  36. [74]

    Fudamoto and P

    Y. Fudamoto and P. A. Oesch and S. Schouws and M. Stefanon and R. Smit and R. J. Bouwens and R. A. A. Bowler and R. Endsley and V. Gonzalez and H. Inami and I. Labbe and D. Stark and M. Aravena and L. Barrufet and E. da Cunha and P. Dayal and A. Ferrara and L. Graziani and J. ...

  37. [75]

    MNRAS , volume =

    Algera, Hiddo S B and Inami, Hanae and Oesch, Pascal A and Sommovigo, Laura and Bouwens, Rychard J and Topping, Michael W and Schouws, Sander and Stefanon, Mauro and Stark, Daniel P and Aravena, Manuel and Barrufet, Laia and da Cunha, Elisabete and Dayal, Pratika and Endsley, ...

  38. [76]

    and McLure, Ross J

    Parsa, Shaghayegh and Dunlop, James S. and McLure, Ross J. and Mortlock, Alice , title = ". MNRAS , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2857 , url =

  39. [77]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202038944

    Khusanova, Y. and. The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey - Obscured star formation rate density and main sequence of star-forming galaxies at z , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202038944", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038944", journal =. 2020 , volume =

  40. [78]

    MNRAS , volume =

    Stach, Stuart M and Dudzevičiūtė, U and Smail, Ian and Swinbank, A M and Geach, J E and Simpson, J M and An, Fang Xia and Almaini, Omar and Arumugam, Vinodiran and Blain, A W and Chapman, S C and Chen, Chian-Chou and Conselice, C J and Cooke, E A and Coppin, K E K and da Cunha...

  41. [79]

    A. J. Barger and L. L. Cowie and C.-C. Chen and F. N. Owen and W.-H. Wang and C. M. Casey and N. Lee and D. B. Sanders and J. P. Williams , title =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/9 , url =

  42. [80]

    Davidzon, I. and. The COSMOS2015 galaxy stellar mass function - Thirteen billion years of stellar mass assembly in ten snapshots , DOI=. A&A , fjournal =. 2017 , volume =

  43. [81]

    Faisst and Martin Sparre and Peter L

    Iary Davidzon and Olivier Ilbert and Andreas L. Faisst and Martin Sparre and Peter L. Capak , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , fjournal =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa19e , url =

  44. [83]

    The evolution of faint submillimetre galaxies at z < 4

    The SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey: the EGS deep field - III. The evolution of faint submillimetre galaxies at z < 4. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2868 , archivePrefix =. 2210.04437 , primaryClass =

  45. [84]

    MNRAS , volume =

    Popesso, P and Concas, A and Cresci, G and Belli, S and Rodighiero, G and Inami, H and Dickinson, M and Ilbert, O and Pannella, M and Elbaz, D , title = ". MNRAS , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3214 , url =

  46. [85]

    and Chávez Dagostino, M

    Montaña, A. and Chávez Dagostino, M. and Aretxaga, I. and Novak, G. and Pope, A. and Wilson, G. , title =. Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana , fjournal =. 2019 , publisher =

  47. [86]

    Hayward and Rachel S

    Gergö Popping and Fabian Walter and Peter Behroozi and Jorge González-López and Christopher C. Hayward and Rachel S. Somerville and Paul van der Werf and Manuel Aravena and Roberto J. Assef and Leindert Boogaard and Franz E. Bauer and Paulo C. Cortes and Pierre Cox and Tanio D...

  48. [87]

    MNRAS , volume =

    Lovell, Christopher C and Geach, James E and Davé, Romeel and Narayanan, Desika and Li, Qi , title = ". MNRAS , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa4043 , url =

  49. [88]

    J. A. Zavala and C. M. Casey and S. M. Manning and M. Aravena and M. Bethermin and K. I. Caputi and D. L. Clements and E. da Cunha and P. Drew and S. L. Finkelstein and S. Fujimoto and C. Hayward and J. Hodge and J. S. Kartaltepe and K. Knudsen and A. M. Koekemoer and A. S. Lo...

  50. [93]

    Austermann, J. E. and Aretxaga, I. and Hughes, D. H. and Kang, Y. and Kim, S. and Lowenthal, J. D. and Perera, T. A. and Sanders, D. B. and Scott, K. S. and Scoville, N. and Wilson, G. W. and Yun, M. S. , title =. MNRAS , fjournal =. 2009 , month =

  51. [94]

    Hogg and Edwin L

    David W. Hogg and Edwin L. Turner , title =. 1998 , month =. doi:10.1086/316173 , url =

  52. [95]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Lectures on Gravitational Lensing. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  53. [97]

    , keywords =

    Dark Matter Halos in the Standard Cosmological Model: Results from the Bolshoi Simulation. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/102 , archivePrefix =. 1002.3660 , primaryClass =

  54. [98]

    Moster and Rachel S

    Benjamin P. Moster and Rachel S. Somerville and Jeffrey A. Newman and Hans-Walter Rix , title =. ApJ , fjournal =. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/731/2/113 , url =

  55. [99]

    , keywords =

    The ALMA Spectroscopic Survey in the HUDF: Deep 1.2 mm Continuum Number Counts. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab765b , archivePrefix =. 2002.07199 , primaryClass =

  56. [101]

    Hopwood and G

    Mattia Negrello and R. Hopwood and G. De Zotti and A. Cooray and A. Verma and J. Bock and D. T. Frayer and M. A. Gurwell and A. Omont and R. Neri and H. Dannerbauer and L. L. Leeuw and E. Barton and J. Cooke and S. Kim and E. da Cunha and G. Rodighiero and P. Cox and D. G. Bon...

  57. [102]

    J. S. Speagle and C. L. Steinhardt and P. L. Capak and J. D. Silverman , title =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 , url =

  58. [103]

    Simpson and Yoshiki Toba and Xinwen Shu and Dave Clements and Josh Greenslade and YiPing Ao and Arif Babul and Jack Birkin and Scott C

    Chen-Fatt Lim and Wei-Hao Wang and Ian Smail and Douglas Scott and Chian-Chou Chen and Yu-Yen Chang and James M. Simpson and Yoshiki Toba and Xinwen Shu and Dave Clements and Josh Greenslade and YiPing Ao and Arif Babul and Jack Birkin and Scott C. Chapman and Tai-An Cheng and...

  59. [104]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201730558

    An ALMA survey of submillimeter galaxies in the COSMOS field: Multiwavelength counterparts and redshift distribution , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201730558", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730558", journal =

  60. [106]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202038487

    The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey - The nature, luminosity function, and star formation history of dusty galaxies up to z , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202038487", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038487", journal =

  61. [109]

    arXiv , author =:1807.06209v1 , month = jul, primaryclass =

  62. [111]

    , year = 1955, month = jan, volume = 121, pages =

    The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution. , year = 1955, month = jan, volume = 121, pages =. doi:10.1086/145971 , url =

  63. [112]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Galaxy Clustering in the Completed SDSS Redshift Survey: The Dependence on Color and Luminosity. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/59 , url =

  64. [113]

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04902.x , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04902.x , eprint =

  65. [114]

    The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary , journal =. 2000. doi:10.1086/301513 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0006396 , primaryClass =

  66. [115]

    The substructure hierarchy in dark matter haloes , journal =. 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16311.x , archivePrefix =. 0911.0436 , primaryClass =

  67. [116]

    , eprint =

    Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars. , eprint =. doi:10.1038/nature03597 , url =

  68. [119]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Galaxies in CDM with Halo Abundance Matching: Luminosity-Velocity Relation, Baryonic Mass-Velocity Relation, Velocity Function, and Clustering. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/16 , url =

  69. [121]

    and Partl, A

    Riebe, K. and Partl, A. M. and Enke, H. and Forero-Romero, J. and Gottl\". The MultiDark Database: Release of the Bolshoi and MultiDark cosmological simulations , journal =. doi:10.1002/asna.201211900 , url =. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/asna.201211900 , year =

  70. [122]

    Dark Sky Simulations: Early Data Release , journal =. 2014

  71. [124]

    and Dwek, Eli , title =

    Hauser, Michael G. and Dwek, Eli , title =. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =. 2001 , doi =

  72. [125]

    and Lagache, G

    Dole, H. and Lagache, G. and Puget, J.-L. and Caputi, K. I. and Fernández-Conde, N. and Le Floc'h, E. and Papovich, C. and Pérez-González, P. G. and Rieke, G. H. and Blaylock, M. , title = ". , keywords =. 2006. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054446 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/060320...

  73. [126]

    2005 , doi =

    Dusty Infrared Galaxies: Sources of the Cosmic Infrared Background , journal =. 2005 , doi =

  74. [127]

    , keywords =

    Tentative detection of a cosmic far-infrared background with COBE. , keywords =

  75. [129]

    and Carilli, C

    Bertoldi, F. and Carilli, C. and Aravena, M. and Schinnerer, E. and Voss, H. and Sm. COSBO: The MAMBO 1.2 Millimeter Imaging Survey of the COSMOS Field. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/520511 , url =

  76. [131]

    and Omont, A

    Beelen, A. and Omont, A. and Bavouzet, N. and Kovács, A. and Lagache, G. and De Breuck, C. and Weiss, A. and Menten, K. M. and Colbert, J. W. and Dole, H. and. Submillimeter observations of the J2142-4423 Ly protocluster at z = 2.38. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10...

  77. [132]

    Ian Smail and R. J. Ivison and A. W. Blain , title =. 1997 , month =. doi:10.1086/311017 , url =

  78. [133]

    , eprint =

    High-redshift star formation in the Hubble Deep Field revealed by a submillimetre-wavelength survey. , eprint =. doi:10.1038/28328 , url =

  79. [134]

    Submillimetre maps, sources and number counts

    The SCUBA 8-mJy survey - I. Submillimetre maps, sources and number counts. , eprint =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05193.x , url =

  80. [138]

    , keywords =

    Dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift. , keywords =. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 , archivePrefix =. 1402.1456 , primaryClass =

  81. [139]

    Morphological transformation and multiwavelength properties of faint submillimetre galaxies

    The SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey: The EGS deep field - II. Morphological transformation and multiwavelength properties of faint submillimetre galaxies. , keywords =. 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty217 , archivePrefix =. 1801.07718 , primaryClass =

  82. [140]

    Zavala, J. A. and Aretxaga, I. and Geach, J. E. and Hughes, D. H. and Birkinshaw, M. and Chapin, E. and Chapman, S. and Chen, Chian-Chou and Clements, D. L. and Dunlop, J. S. and Farrah, D. and Ivison, R. J. and Jenness, T. and Michałowski, M. J. and Robson, E. I. and Scott, D...

  83. [141]

    Ian Smail and R. J. Ivison and F. N. Owen and A. W. Blain and J.-P. Kneib , title =. ApJ , fjournal =. doi:10.1086/308226 , url =

  84. [142]

    , keywords =

    A SCUBA Galaxy in the Protocluster around 53W002 at z=2.4. , keywords =. 2003. doi:10.1086/345474 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0210183 , primaryClass =

  85. [143]

    S. C. Chapman and G. Helou and G. F. Lewis and D. A. Dale , doi =. The Bivariate Luminosity-Color Distribution

  86. [146]

    and Coppin, Kristen and Mortier, Angela M

    Aretxaga, Itziar and Hughes, David H. and Coppin, Kristen and Mortier, Angela M. J. and Wagg, Jeff and Dunlop, James S. and Chapin, Edward L. and Eales, Stephen A. and Gaztañaga, Enrique and Halpern, Mark and Ivison, Rob J. and. The SCUBA Half Degree Extragalactic Survey - IV....

  87. [149]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201219368

    Millimeter imaging of submillimeter galaxies in the COSMOS field: redshift distribution , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201219368", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219368", journal =

  88. [150]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Characterization of SCUBA-2 450 m and 850 m selected galaxies in the COSMOS field. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1673 , url =

  89. [151]

    and Bradford, C

    Riechers, Dominik A. and Bradford, C. M. and Clements, D. L. and Dowell, C. D. and Pérez-Fournon, I. and Ivison, R. J. and Bridge, C. and Conley, A. and Fu, Hai and Vieira, J. D. and Wardlow, J. and Calanog, J. and Cooray, A. and Hurley, P. and Neri, R. and Kamenetzky, J. and ...

  90. [152]

    and Dunlop, J

    Michałowski, Michał J. and Dunlop, J. S. and Koprowski, M. P. and Cirasuolo, M. and Geach, J. E. and Bowler, R. A. A. and Mortlock, A. and Caputi, K. I. and Aretxaga, I. and Arumugam, V. and Chen, Chian-Chou and McLure, R. J. and Birkinshaw, M. and Bourne, N. and Farrah, D. an...

  91. [153]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =

    Lutz, Dieter , title =. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =. 2014 , doi =

  92. [154]

    and Ellis, R

    Laporte, N. and Ellis, R. S. and Boone, F. and Bauer, F. E. and Quénard, D. and Roberts-Borsani, G. W. and Pelló, R. and Pérez-Fournon, I. and Streblyanska, A. , title = ". , keywords =. 2017. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa62aa , archivePrefix =. 1703.02039 , primaryClass =

  93. [155]

    Characterizing submillimetre galaxies using deep Spitzer imaging

    The Hubble Deep Field-North SCUBA Super-map - IV. Characterizing submillimetre galaxies using deep Spitzer imaging. , eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10575.x , adsurl =

  94. [156]

    , keywords =

    A Population of z > 2 Far-infrared Herschel-SPIRE-selected Starbursts. , keywords =. 2012. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/139 , archivePrefix =. 1210.4932 , primaryClass =

  95. [158]

    Probing the evolution of PACS selected Galaxies to z 4

    The Herschel PEP/HerMES luminosity function - I. Probing the evolution of PACS selected Galaxies to z 4. , keywords =. 2013. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt308 , archivePrefix =. 1302.5209 , primaryClass =

  96. [159]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic Star-Formation History. , keywords =. 2014. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 , archivePrefix =. 1403.0007 , primaryClass =

  97. [160]

    , keywords =

    Toward a Unification of Star Formation Rate Determinations in the Milky Way and Other Galaxies. , keywords =. 2011. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/6/197 , archivePrefix =. 1110.4105 , primaryClass =

  98. [161]

    , keywords =

    Submillimeter galaxies. , keywords =. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00134-5 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0202228 , primaryClass =

  99. [164]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201014748

    The dust content of high-z submillimeter galaxies revealed by Herschel *** , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201014748", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014748", journal =

  100. [165]

    Infrared Emission from Interstellar Dust. IV. The Silicate-Graphite-PAH Model in the Post-Spitzer Era. , eprint =. doi:10.1086/511055 , url =

  101. [166]

    , year = 1996, volume = 34, pages =

    Luminous Infrared Galaxies. , year = 1996, volume = 34, pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.749 , url =

  102. [167]

    Astrophysics Update 2, Springer Praxis Books

    Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies. Astrophysics Update 2, Springer Praxis Books. ISBN 978-3-540-30312-1. Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2006, p. 285 , year =. doi:10.1007/3-540-30313-8_9 , url =

  103. [169]

    , keywords =

    Modeling the Effects of Dust on Galactic Spectral Energy Distributions from the Ultraviolet to the Millimeter Band. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/306476 , url =

  104. [170]

    Blain, A. W. and Barnard, V. E. and Chapman, S. C. , title = ". MNRAS , fjournal =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06086.x , url =

  105. [172]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Distance measures in cosmology. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. 1999

  106. [174]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 , url =

  107. [175]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Mid- and far-infrared luminosity functions and galaxy evolution from multiwavelength Spitzer observations up to z 2.5. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912058 , url =

  108. [176]

    , keywords =

    The deepest Herschel-PACS far-infrared survey: number counts and infrared luminosity functions from combined PEP/GOODS-H observations. , keywords =. 2013. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321371 , archivePrefix =. 1303.4436 , primaryClass =

  109. [177]

    , keywords =

    The evolving far-IR galaxy luminosity function and dust-obscured star formation rate density out to z 5. , keywords =. 2017. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1843 , archivePrefix =. 1706.00426 , primaryClass =

  110. [179]

    Bell and Casey Papovich and Christian Wolf and Emeric Le Floc'h and John A

    Eric F. Bell and Casey Papovich and Christian Wolf and Emeric Le Floc'h and John A. R. Caldwell and Marco Barden and Eiichi Egami and Daniel H. McIntosh and Klaus Meisenheimer and Pablo G. Perez-Gonzalez and G. H. Rieke and M. J. Rieke and Jane R. Rigby and Hans-Walter Rix , t...

  111. [180]

    , keywords =

    Calibrating Extinction-free Star Formation Rate Diagnostics with 33 GHz Free-free Emission in NGC 6946. , keywords =. 2011. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/67 , archivePrefix =. 1105.4877 , primaryClass =

  112. [181]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Evolution of cosmic star formation in the SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx031 , url =

  113. [182]

    Behroozi and Risa H

    Peter S. Behroozi and Risa H. Wechsler and Charlie Conroy , title =. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 , url =

  114. [186]

    , eprint =

    Statistical Properties of X-Ray Clusters: Analytic and Numerical Comparisons. , eprint =. doi:10.1086/305262 , url =

  115. [188]

    , keywords =

    Rodríguez-Puebla, Aldo and Behroozi, Peter and Primack, Joel and Klypin, Anatoly and Lee, Christoph and Hellinger, Doug , title = ". , keywords =. 2016. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1705 , archivePrefix =. 1602.04813 , primaryClass =

  116. [189]

    , eprint =

    MoMaF: the Mock Map Facility. , eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09019.x , url =

  117. [190]

    , keywords =

    A Comprehensive Analysis of Uncertainties Affecting the Stellar Mass-Halo Mass Relation for 0 &lt; z &lt; 4. , keywords =. 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/379 , archivePrefix =. 1001.0015 , primaryClass =

  118. [191]

    , keywords =

    Constraints on the Relationship between Stellar Mass and Halo Mass at Low and High Redshift. , keywords =. 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/710/2/903 , archivePrefix =. 0903.4682 , primaryClass =

  119. [192]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Evolution of the Galaxy-Dark Matter Connection and the Assembly of Galaxies in Dark Matter Halos. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/41 , url =

  120. [193]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Galactic star formation and accretion histories from matching galaxies to dark matter haloes. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts261 , url =

  121. [195]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The Connection Between Galaxies and Their Dark Matter Halos. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051756 , url =

  122. [196]

    M. T. Sargent and M. Béthermin and E. Daddi and D. Elbaz , title =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/747/2/l31 , url =

  123. [197]

    Matthieu B. A. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/757/2/l23 , url =

  124. [198]

    Huynh and David T

    Minh T. Huynh and David T. Frayer and Bahram Mobasher and Mark Dickinson and Ranga-Ram Chary and Glenn Morrison , title =. doi:10.1086/521981 , url =

  125. [199]

    Geach, J. E. and Chapin, E. L. and Coppin, K. E. K. and Dunlop, J. S. and Halpern, M. and Smail, Ian and Werf, P. van der and Serjeant, S. and Farrah, D. and Roseboom, I. and Targett, T. and Arumugam, V. and Asboth, V. and Blain, A. and Chrysostomou, A. and Clarke, C. and Ivis...

  126. [200]

    , keywords =

    The SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey: 850 m maps, catalogues and number counts. , keywords =. 2017. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2721 , archivePrefix =. 1607.03904 , primaryClass =

  127. [202]

    Maps, catalogues and source counts

    AzTEC half square degree survey of the SHADES fields - I. Maps, catalogues and source counts. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15620.x , url =

  128. [203]

    Source catalogue over 0.72 deg ^ 2 and plausible boosting by large-scale structure

    AzTEC millimetre survey of the COSMOS field - III. Source catalogue over 0.72 deg ^ 2 and plausible boosting by large-scale structure. , keywords =. 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18989.x , archivePrefix =. 1105.0890 , primaryClass =

  129. [204]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Early Science with the Large Millimeter Telescope: observations of dust continuum and CO emission lines of cluster-lensed submillimetre galaxies at z=2.0-4.7. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1351 , url =

  130. [206]

    , keywords =

    The ALMA Spectroscopic Survey in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Search for [CII] Line and Dust Emission in 6 < z < 8 galaxies. , keywords =. 2016. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/71 , archivePrefix =. 1607.06772 , primaryClass =

  131. [208]

    , keywords =

    On the existence of bright IR galaxies at z > ; 2: tension between Herschel and SCUBA-2 results?. , keywords =. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3278 , archivePrefix =. 1812.00682 , primaryClass =

  132. [210]

    The impact of clustering and angular resolution on far-infrared and millimeter continuum observations

    Béthermin, Matthieu and Wu, Hao-Yi and Lagache, Guilaine and. The impact of clustering and angular resolution on far-infrared and millimeter continuum observations. , keywords =. 2017. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730866 , archivePrefix =. 1703.08795 , primaryClass =

  133. [211]

    and Davé, Romeel , title = "

    Somerville, Rachel S. and Davé, Romeel , title = ". , keywords =. 2015. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 , archivePrefix =. 1412.2712 , primaryClass =

  134. [212]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The AzTEC mm-wavelength camera. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12980.x , url =

  135. [213]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Early Science with the Large Millimeter Telescope: CO and [C II] Emission in the z = 4.3 AzTEC J095942.9+022938 (COSMOS AzTEC-1). , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1963 , url =

  136. [215]

    , keywords =

    Bias and Variance of Angular Correlation Functions. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/172900 , adsurl =

  137. [216]

    , keywords =

    The SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey: the clustering of submillimetre galaxies in the UKIDSS UDS field. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2405 , archivePrefix =. 1604.00018 , primaryClass =

  138. [217]

    , keywords =

    Multi-wavelength Properties of Radio- and Machine-learning-identified Counterparts to Submillimeter Sources in S2COSMOS. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4d53 , archivePrefix =. 1910.03596 , primaryClass =

  139. [218]

    , keywords =

    A Fast and Accurate Analytic Method of Calculating Galaxy Two-point Correlation Functions. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1daa , archivePrefix =. 2107.06918 , primaryClass =

  140. [219]

    , keywords =

    The angular correlation function and hierarchical moments of -0.5ex 70000 faint galaxies to R=23.5. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02652.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9803331 , primaryClass =

  141. [220]

    O., 1958, @doi [ApJS] 10.1086/190036 , 3, 211

    Abell G. O., 1958, @doi [ApJS] 10.1086/190036 , 3, 211

  142. [221]

    W., Evrard A

    Allen S. W., Evrard A. E., Mantz A. B., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102514 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ARA&A..49..409A 49, 409

  143. [222]

    A., Zavala J

    Araya-Araya P., Gonz \'a lez-L \'o pez J., B \'e thermin M., Riechers D. A., Zavala J. A., Chapman S. C., et al., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348123 , 683, A54

  144. [223]

    Bakx T. J. L. C., Gray B. S., González-Nuevo J., Bonavera L., Amvrosiadis A., Eales S., Hagimoto M., Serjeant S., 2023, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stad3759 , 527, 8865

  145. [224]

    C., et al., 2025, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adf644 , 990, 225

    Baxter D. C., et al., 2025, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adf644 , 990, 225

  146. [225]

    S., Wechsler R

    Behroozi P. S., Wechsler R. H., Wu H.-Y., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/109 , 762, 109

  147. [226]

    S., Wechsler R

    Behroozi P. S., Wechsler R. H., Wu H.-Y., Busha M. T., Klypin A. A., Primack J. R., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/18 , 763, 18

  148. [227]

    J., et al., 2025, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/staf816 , 540, 1560

    Bendo G. J., et al., 2025, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/staf816 , 540, 1560

  149. [228]

    Bing L., et al., 2023, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346579 , 677, A66

  150. [229]

    M., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/36 , 824, 36

    Casey C. M., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/36 , 824, 36

  151. [230]

    M., et al., 2012, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/140 , 761, 140

    Casey C. M., et al., 2012, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/140 , 761, 140

  152. [231]

    M., Cooray A., Capak P., Darvish B., Hung C.-L., Kartaltepe J., et al., 2015, @doi [ApJL] 10.1088/2041-8205/808/2/L33 , 808, L33

    Casey C. M., Cooray A., Capak P., Darvish B., Hung C.-L., Kartaltepe J., et al., 2015, @doi [ApJL] 10.1088/2041-8205/808/2/L33 , 808, L33

  153. [232]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac82d , 862, 77

    Casey C. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac82d , 862, 77

  154. [233]

    Chabrier G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376392 , 115, 763

  155. [234]

    C., Blain A

    Chapman S. C., Blain A. W., Smail I., Ivison R. J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428082 , 622, 772

  156. [235]

    Chen J., et al., 2022, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stac2989 , 518, 1378

  157. [236]

    Chiang Y.-K., Overzier R., Gebhardt K., 2013, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/127 , 779, 127

  158. [237]

    Chiang Y.-K., Overzier R., Gebhardt K., 2017, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7f2f , 844, L23

  159. [238]

    L., et al., 2010, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014581 , 518, L8

    Clements D. L., et al., 2010, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014581 , 518, L8

  160. [239]

    Dressler A., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157753 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...236..351D 236, 351

  161. [240]

    S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3088 , 466, 861

    Dunlop J. S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3088 , 466, 861

  162. [241]

    B., et al., 2020, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9df7 , 900, 55

    Everett W. B., et al., 2020, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9df7 , 900, 55

  163. [242]

    Franco M., et al., 2018, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832928 , 620, A152

  164. [243]

    Franco M., et al., 2020, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038310 , 643, A53

  165. [244]

    Fujimoto S., Ouchi M., Ono Y., Shibuya T., Ishigaki M., Nagai H., Momose R., 2015, @doi [ApJS] 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/1 , 222, 1

  166. [245]

    E., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2721 , 465, 1789

    Geach J. E., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2721 , 465, 1789

  167. [246]

    Gonz \'a lez-L \'o pez J., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab765b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...897...91G 897, 91

  168. [247]

    Hashimoto T., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJL] 10.3847/2041-8213/acf57c , 955, L2

  169. [248]

    Hatsukade B., Ohta K., Seko A., Yabe K., Akiyama M., 2013, @doi [ApJL] 10.1088/2041-8205/769/2/L27 , 769, L27

  170. [249]

    Hatsukade B., et al., 2016, @doi [PASJ] 10.1093/pasj/psw026 , 68

  171. [250]

    H., et al., 2020, in Marshall H

    Hughes D. H., et al., 2020, in Marshall H. K., Spyromilio J., Usuda T., eds, Vol. 11445, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VIII. SPIE, p. 1144522, @doi 10.1117/12.2561893 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2561893

  172. [251]

    Karim A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt196 , 432, 2

  173. [252]

    Kato Y., et al., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8205/820/1/L24 , 820, L24

  174. [253]

    Kennicutt Jr. R. C., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 , 36, 189

  175. [254]

    Klypin A., Yepes G., Gottl\" o ber S., Prada F., He S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw248 , 457, 4340

  176. [255]

    V., Borgani S., 2012, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 , 50, 353–409

    Kravtsov A. V., Borgani S., 2012, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 , 50, 353–409

  177. [256]

    Lacey C., Cole S., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/262.3.627 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993MNRAS.262..627L 262, 627

  178. [257]

    J., Witten C., 2022, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244719 , 667, L3

    Laporte N., Zitrin A., Dole H., Roberts-Borsani G., Furtak L. J., Witten C., 2022, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244719 , 667, L3

  179. [258]

    R., et al., 2011, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/83 , 737, 83

    Lindner R. R., et al., 2011, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/83 , 737, 83

  180. [259]

    Madau P., Dickinson M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 , 52, 415

  181. [260]

    Magnelli B., et al., 2019, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1912 , 877, 45

  182. [261]

    J., Barger A

    McKay S. J., Barger A. J., Cowie L. L., Bauer F. E., Rosenthal M. J. N., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acd1e5 , 951, 48

  183. [262]

    Montaña A., Chávez Dagostino M., Aretxaga I., Novak G., Pope A., Wilson G., 2019, Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana, 90, 632

  184. [263]

    I., Hatch N

    Muldrew S. I., Hatch N. A., Cooke E. A., 2015, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stv1449 , 452, 2528

  185. [264]

    A., Montaña A., Aretxaga I., Rodríguez-Puebla A., Avila-Reese V., Peralta E., 2024, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stae1417 , 531, 4900

    Nava-Moreno N. A., Montaña A., Aretxaga I., Rodríguez-Puebla A., Avila-Reese V., Peralta E., 2024, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stae1417 , 531, 4900

  186. [265]

    Negrello M., et al., 2017, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stw2911 , 465, 3558

  187. [266]

    Oteo I., et al., 2018, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa1f1 , 856, 72

  188. [267]

    A., 2016, @doi [A&ARv] 10.1007/s00159-016-0098-5 , 24, 14

    Overzier R. A., 2016, @doi [A&ARv] 10.1007/s00159-016-0098-5 , 24, 14

  189. [268]

    Pacifici C., et al., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/0004-637x/832/1/79 , 832, 79

  190. [269]

    Planck Collaboration 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 , 594, A13

  191. [270]

    Planck Collaboration et al., 2013, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220053 , 550, A133

  192. [271]

    A., Aretxaga I., Hughes D

    Quirós-Rojas M., Montaña A., Zavala J. A., Aretxaga I., Hughes D. H., 2024, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stae1974 , 533, 2966

  193. [272]

    Remus R.-S., Dolag K., Dannerbauer H., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/accb91 , 950, 191

  194. [273]

    arXiv:2404.10801

    Rodriguez-Puebla A., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2404.10801 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240410801R p. arXiv:2404.10801

  195. [274]

    Rodr \' guez-Puebla A., Drory N., Avila-Reese V., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...756....2R 756, 2

  196. [275]

    Rodr \' guez-Puebla A., Avila-Reese V., Drory N., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/92 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767...92R 767, 92

  197. [276]

    M., Primack J

    Rodr \' guez-Puebla A., Avila-Reese V., Cano-D \' az M., Faber S. M., Primack J. R., Franco J., Aretxaga I., Santiago-Mayoral E., 2020, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc7c2 , 905, 171

  198. [277]

    R., Behroozi P., Faber S

    Rodríguez-Puebla A., Primack J. R., Behroozi P., Faber S. M., 2016a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2513 , 455, 2592

  199. [278]

    Rodríguez-Puebla A., Behroozi P., Primack J., Klypin A., Lee C., Hellinger D., 2016b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1705 , 462, 893

  200. [279]

    R., Avila-Reese V., Faber S

    Rodríguez-Puebla A., Primack J. R., Avila-Reese V., Faber S. M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1172 , 470, 651

  201. [280]

    S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20905.x , 423, 575

    Scott K. S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20905.x , 423, 575

  202. [281]

    M., et al., 2015, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637x/807/2/128 , 807, 128

    Simpson J. M., et al., 2015, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637x/807/2/128 , 807, 128

  203. [282]

    Soucail G., Fo \"e x G., Pointecouteau E., Arnaud M., Limousin M., 2015, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424831 , 581, A14

  204. [283]

    G., et al., 2014, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/790/1/77 , 790, 77

    Staguhn J. G., et al., 2014, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/790/1/77 , 790, 77

  205. [284]

    Toshikawa J., et al., 2012, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/137 , 750, 137

  206. [285]

    Valiante E., et al., 2016, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stw1806 , 462, 3146

  207. [286]

    D., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/763 , 719, 763

    Vieira J. D., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/763 , 719, 763

  208. [287]

    Wang T., et al., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/56 , 828, 56

  209. [288]

    A., et al., 2021, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stab3300 , 510, 2261

    Ward B. A., et al., 2021, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stab3300 , 510, 2261

  210. [289]

    A., Eales S

    Ward B. A., Eales S. A., Ivison R. J., Arumugam V., 2024, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stae405 , 530, 4887

  211. [290]

    L., et al., 2012, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/59 , 762, 59

    Wardlow J. L., et al., 2012, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/59 , 762, 59

  212. [291]

    E., Pope A., Cybulski R., Casey C

    Whitaker K. E., Pope A., Cybulski R., Casey C. M., Popping G., Yun M. S., 2017, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa94ce , 850, 208

  213. [292]

    White S. D. M., Rees M. J., 1978, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 , 183, 341

  214. [293]

    W., et al., 2020, in Zmuidzinas J., Gao J.-R., eds, Vol

    Wilson G. W., et al., 2020, in Zmuidzinas J., Gao J.-R., eds, Vol. 11453, Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy X. SPIE, p. 1145302, @doi 10.1117/12.2562331 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2562331

  215. [294]

    arXiv:2605.28930

    Witten C., et al., 2026, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2605.28930 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260528930W p. arXiv:2605.28930

  216. [295]

    A., Aretxaga I., Hughes D

    Zavala J. A., Aretxaga I., Hughes D. H., 2014, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stu1330 , 443, 2384

  217. [296]

    A., et al., 2021, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abdb27 , 909, 165

    Zavala J. A., et al., 2021, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abdb27 , 909, 165

  218. [297]

    da Cunha E., et al., 2013, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637x/766/1/13 , 766, 13

  219. [298]

    da Cunha E., et al., 2021, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0ae0 , 919, 30

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.