Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 109 references

SCRIPT in the Cosmic Dawn: Distinguishing Redshift-Evolving Galaxy Populations with 21-cm Fluctuations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A static galaxy population can mimic the 21-cm global signal but not its power spectrum.

desk verdict Solid SCRIPT extension with a clear global-signal degeneracy demo, but the 'definitively broken' claim outruns the evidence; referee it with a request to qualify or broaden the static-model search. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03441 v1 pith:LHV64OIY submitted 2026-08-04 astro-ph.CO

Janakee Raste , Tirthankar Roy Choudhury This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords 21-cmcosmologyCosmicDawnspintemperaturefluctuationsLyman-alphacouplingX-rayheatingJWSThigh-redshiftgalaxiesUVluminosityfunctionspowerspectrumdegeneracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tackles a practical question: if JWST is right that galaxies evolved rapidly at z>10, can 21-cm observations of neutral hydrogen prove it? It argues that the sky-averaged global 21-cm signal alone cannot, because a galaxy population with no redshift evolution can be tuned to reproduce the absorption trough of an evolving population. The spatial power spectrum can, however, because the fluctuations remember the clustering bias of the halos that emitted the radiation: the tuned static model predicts substantially lower power-spectrum amplitudes at all characteristic peaks. If correct, this means the combination of global-signal and power-spectrum measurements can robustly constrain the redshift evolution of high-redshift galaxies.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 21-cm power spectrum, evaluated at k=0.05 h/Mpc, together with the halo population that produces the radiation. The framework SCRIPT computes inhomogeneous spin-temperature fluctuations from Lyman-alpha coupling and X-ray heating using two independent photon-conserving schemes, Source and Sink, cross-validated for resolution convergence. The argument-carrying identity is that the amplitude of the power spectrum depends on the square of the global signal times the spatial clustering of the emitting halos; low-mass halos are more abundant but less clustered, so shifting emission to them suppresses the power spectrum even when the photon budget is identical. This is the structural memory of the source halo bias.

What would settle it

Run the same SCRIPT comparison with a static star-formation model but allow the X-ray efficiency to vary with redshift, or adopt a harder X-ray spectral energy distribution, and check whether a static population can match both the Fiducial global absorption trough and the Fiducial power-spectrum amplitudes at all three peaks; if such a model exists, the structural-memory degeneracy breaking is not definitive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper demonstrates a degeneracy and its resolution. Using the photon-conserving SCRIPT framework extended to spin-temperature fluctuations, it builds a Fiducial galaxy model with redshift-evolving star-formation efficiency that matches JWST UV luminosity functions, and a Static model with redshift-independent efficiency. It then finds a Static-Tuned model with f_L=10, f_X=5e-4, beta_X=-3 whose global absorption trough nearly exactly matches the Fiducial one: the steep negative X-ray mass scaling shifts heating to abundant, low-mass halos, masking the absence of evolution. Yet the 21-cm power spectrum of Static-Tuned has systematically lower amplitudes at the Lyman-alpha, X-ray heating, and reionization peaks, because the spatial fluctuations retain a structural memory of the clustering bias of the source halos. This breaks the degeneracy that global-signal measurements alone cannot resolve, and the paper concludes that combining global and fluctuation measurements is essential to robustly constrain the redshift evolution of high-redshift galaxies.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion assumes that the simple redshift-independent power-law parameterization used for the static galaxy population covers every plausible static population; if a wider class of static models were allowed and one of them matched both the global signal and the power spectrum, the claimed degeneracy breaking would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A static galaxy population can reproduce the global absorption trough of an evolving population only by shifting X-ray heating to low-mass halos, so global-signal fits by themselves cannot identify the galaxy population.
  • The 21-cm power spectrum separates the two populations: the tuned static model has systematically lower amplitudes at the Lyman-alpha, X-ray heating, and reionization peaks even when the global signals match.
  • Combining global and fluctuation measurements is the route to robustly constraining the redshift evolution of high-redshift galaxies, complementing bright-end UV luminosity function constraints.
  • The upgraded SCRIPT framework, with its resolution-converged dual radiative-transfer schemes, is suited to fast parameter-space exploration and emulator-based inference for upcoming low-frequency arrays.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the structural-memory argument generalizes beyond this specific pair of models: any two source populations with the same photon budget but different halo-mass weighting should be separable by the 21-cm power spectrum, since the fluctuation amplitude encodes the bias of the dominant emitters.
  • Inference: a wider static parameter space could still hide a model that matches both the global signal and the power spectrum; the paper's trial-and-error search does not rule that out, so the 'definitively broken' claim should be read as a demonstration within this parameterization.
  • Inference: the same Fiducial-versus-Static comparison could be run for the reionization-era part of the signal around z~7, where UV ionizing photons dominate, to test whether the bias memory persists when the driver is ionizing radiation rather than Lyman-alpha and X-ray photons.
  • Inference: if a real global-signal detection is accompanied by low power-spectrum amplitudes at all peaks, that would point toward radiation dominated by abundant, weakly clustered low-mass halos — a distinctive signature of the static-type population rather than an evolving one.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper extends the SCRIPT semi-numerical framework to include 21-cm spin-temperature fluctuations driven by inhomogeneous Lyman-alpha coupling and X-ray heating during the Cosmic Dawn. The authors compare a JWST-calibrated Fiducial galaxy model with a redshift-evolving star-formation efficiency against a Static, redshift-independent baseline model. They show that a tuned Static model (f_L=10, f_X=5e-4, beta_X=-3) can reproduce the Fiducial global 21-cm absorption trough, but that the corresponding 21-cm power spectrum at k=0.05 h/Mpc is substantially lower, and conclude that combining global and power-spectrum measurements definitively breaks the degeneracy between evolving and static galaxy populations.

Significance. If the central claim is made robust, the paper is valuable: it demonstrates a concrete route toward distinguishing evolving from static source populations with 21-cm observables, and it extends SCRIPT into a fast, photon-conserving Cosmic Dawn tool. The paper's strengths are its two independently implemented radiative-transfer schemes (Source and Sink) that cross-validate each other, convergence tests over spatial resolution and redshift step, the explicit treatment of sub-grid Lyman-shell weighting, and the calibration of source models against JWST UV luminosity functions and reionization constraints. The quantitative prediction that a static-population fit to the global signal underproduces the 21-cm power spectrum is falsifiable with upcoming interferometers, which makes the framework a useful basis for future parameter estimation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, Table 1, Fig. 3] The central claim that the degeneracy is 'definitively broken' rests on a single hand-tuned Static-Tuned model found by a 'simple trial-and-error search'. That search varies f_L, f_X, and beta_X while fixing beta_L=0, alpha=1.5, and the static SFE shape. This is not a sufficient exploration of the static-model parameter space. The paper's own Fig. 2 bottom-left panel shows that positive beta_L increases the Lyman-alpha peak amplitude, and Eq. (2.6) permits beta_L to shift Lyman-alpha emission toward more clustered high-mass halos. A static model with beta_L>0 and a less negative beta_X could plausibly match the global signal while raising the power-spectrum peaks toward Fiducial values. To support 'definitively broken', the authors should either scan the static parameter space, including beta_L and alpha, and show that no model reproduces both the global signal and the power spectrum, or rephrase the conclusion as a proof-of-concept demonstration. As written, the load-bearing assumption of parameterization completeness is unverified.
  2. [Fig. 3, §4] The 21-cm power-spectrum comparison is shown only at k = 0.05 h/Mpc. The abstract and Section 4 state that the tuned static model predicts lower amplitude 'across all characteristic peaks', but this is a statement about one wavenumber across redshift. The conclusion would be much more robust if the power spectra were compared over the observable k range, for example k = 0.01-1 h/Mpc, or if the authors justified why k = 0.05 h/Mpc is representative. Without this, the 'definitively broken' claim is not established for future interferometric measurements that will probe a range of scales.
  3. [§3.3] The Static-Tuned global signal is described as 'nearly indistinguishable' from the Fiducial model, but no quantitative metric is defined. Since the subsequent argument relies on the two global signals being consistent within observational uncertainty, the authors should specify a tolerance, such as a residual rms in mK or a chi-square relative to the expected noise of upcoming global-signal experiments. A quantitative criterion would make the degeneracy claim concrete and reproducible.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, §4] The phrase 'definitively broken' is stronger than the currently presented evidence; consider 'can be broken' or 'strongly disfavored' for the specific Static-Tuned model until the parameter-space exploration is broadened.
  2. [Appendix B.2] The redshift-integrator convergence test with Delta z=1 is described as 'not shown here'. Since convergence claims are an important part of the paper's methodological contribution, this test should either be shown in a figure or summarized with concrete numbers.
  3. [§2.2] The paper notes that thermal effects of Lyman-alpha photons are neglected, citing the authors' own earlier work on this effect. A brief quantitative statement of the expected magnitude at the redshifts of interest would help readers assess the impact of this approximation.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The bottom panels of Fig. 2 show power spectra at a single wavenumber k=0.05 h/Mpc; this should be stated in the caption explicitly, as the same convention is used throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Static-Tuned global match is a fit, but the power spectrum is an independent, non-fitted prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. In §2, SCRIPT computes Lyman-α coupling (eqs. 2.5–2.14), X-ray heating (eqs. 2.15–2.27), and the 21-cm brightness temperature (eqs. 2.28–2.29) from the galaxy population and radiation parameters. The Fiducial and Static star-formation models are calibrated to external UVLF data in §3.1, with Figure 1 showing the comparison to observed JWST and ground-based luminosity functions. In §3.3, the Static-Tuned parameters (fL = 10, fX = 5×10^-4, βX = -3) are explicitly fitted to the Fiducial global absorption trough through a 'simple trial-and-error search'; the paper does not present this global-signal agreement as a prediction. The 21-cm power spectrum is then computed from the same radiation fields but was not used in the fitting, and the lower amplitude is attributed to the lower clustering bias of the low-mass halos that dominate the Static-Tuned X-ray emission. No equation identifies the power spectrum with the fitted global signal by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations to SCRIPT [84,85] and to earlier analytic 21-cm work [81,82,91,92] are anchored to externally falsifiable calibrations (JWST UVLFs, Planck cosmology, X-ray binary luminosity) rather than used to forbid alternative models. The principal weakness—that only one hand-tuned static model was found and the full static parameter space (including βL and α) was not exhaustively searched—is a completeness and robustness limitation of the 'definitively broken' claim, not a circularity of the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 13 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on semi-numerical source models calibrated with 13 fitted parameters covering star-formation efficiency evolution, Lyman-alpha and X-ray efficiency normalizations and slopes, the X-ray spectral index, and reionization escape efficiency. The physically load-bearing assumptions are the coarse-grid halo population from conditional ellipsoidal collapse, the atomic-cooling threshold, and the redshift-independent power-law efficiency laws. No new particles or entities are introduced.

free parameters (13)
  • lstar0 (log10 epsilon_star,10 normalization) = -0.69 (Fiducial); -2.90 (Static)
    Eq. (2.4); sets the low-redshift normalization of star-formation efficiency, fitted to UVLFs.
  • lstarjump = 5.06 (Fiducial); 0 (Static)
    Eq. (2.4); amplitude of the tanh jump in star-formation efficiency, fitted to JWST UVLFs.
  • betastar0 = 1.82 (Fiducial); 0.61 (Static)
    Eq. (2.4); low-redshift power-law slope of efficiency versus halo mass.
  • betastarjump = 3.04 (Fiducial); 0 (Static)
    Eq. (2.4); change in the mass slope at high redshift.
  • ztrans = 16.22 (Fiducial)
    Eq. (2.4); transition redshift of the tanh function, chosen to match UVLF evolution.
  • Deltaz = 7.23 (Fiducial)
    Eq. (2.4); width of the tanh transition, chosen to match UVLF evolution.
  • fL,0 = 1 (Fiducial); 10 (Static-Tuned)
    Eq. (2.6); normalization of Lyman-alpha efficiency, free parameter.
  • betaL = 0 (all models)
    Eq. (2.6); mass slope of Lyman-alpha efficiency, free parameter.
  • fX,0 = 10 (Fiducial); 0.0005 (Static-Tuned)
    Eq. (2.17); normalization of X-ray efficiency; the Static-Tuned value is chosen to reproduce the fiducial global signal.
  • betaX = 0 (Fiducial); -3.0 (Static-Tuned)
    Eq. (2.17); mass slope of X-ray efficiency; the steep negative slope shifts heating to low-mass halos.
  • alpha (X-ray SED spectral index) = 1.5
    Eq. (2.18); free spectral index of the X-ray photon spectrum, fixed throughout.
  • epsilon_esc,10 = 0.91 (Fiducial); 1.38 (Static)
    Eq. (3.1); normalization of ionizing escape efficiency, tuned to reionization history.
  • beta_esc = -0.18
    Eq. (3.1); mass dependence of escape efficiency, tuned to reionization history.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Conditional ellipsoidal collapse (Sheth-Tormen) halo population in each coarse grid cell accurately represents the abundance and bias of star-forming halos.
    Used to build density and source fields in Section 2.1; the power-spectrum memory argument depends on this halo bias.
  • domain assumption Star-forming halos are only those above the atomic cooling threshold; minihalos are neglected.
    Source integration in eq. (2.5) begins at the atomic cooling threshold, affecting photon budgets and clustering.
  • domain assumption X-ray sources follow a power-law SED anchored to a local HMXB calibration, with an efficiency fX(Mh) that is a redshift-independent power law in halo mass.
    Eqs. (2.17) and (2.18); the Static-Tuned model depends on this steep power law extending to low masses.
  • domain assumption Lyman-alpha photon production is proportional to UV luminosity with an efficiency fL(Mh) that is a mass power law, and thermal effects of Lyman-alpha photons are neglected.
    Eqs. (2.5)-(2.7) and (2.11); the neglect of Lyman-alpha heating is stated in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption Collisional coupling and redshift-space distortions are negligible at the redshifts studied.
    Stated in Section 2.4; both affect the 21-cm signal and power spectrum.
  • domain assumption Planck 2018 cosmological parameters are adopted.
    Cosmological parameters from reference [86] are used for the simulation boxes and signal normalization.
  • domain assumption The power spectrum at k = 0.05 h/Mpc computed on a 256 h^-1 Mpc box with Ngrid = 16 is representative of large-scale fluctuations for all characteristic peaks.
    Main results use this resolution and scale; convergence tests in Appendix B support the choice but do not prove representativeness for all claims.
  • ad hoc to paper The power-law, redshift-independent static parameterization spans the plausible ways a static galaxy population could mimic the fiducial signal.
    Central to the 'definitively broken' claim; only a trial-and-error search within this narrow family is performed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SCRIPT in the Cosmic Dawn: Distinguishing Redshift-Evolving Galaxy Populations with 21-cm Fluctuations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LHV64OIY

@misc{pith2026260803441,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SCRIPT in the Cosmic Dawn: Distinguishing Redshift-Evolving Galaxy Populations with 21-cm Fluctuations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LHV64OIY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03441}
}
abstract

Recent James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations suggest an unexpectedly high abundance of luminous galaxies at $z \gtrsim 10$, challenging traditional models of star formation. The 21-cm signal of neutral hydrogen offers a complementary, volume-averaged probe of these early epochs. In this work, we present a major extension to the explicitly photon-conserving semi-numerical framework SCRIPT, enabling the self-consistent calculation of spin temperature fluctuations driven by inhomogeneous Lyman-$\alpha$ coupling and X-ray heating during the Cosmic Dawn. Using this framework, we compare a JWST-informed fiducial galaxy model, featuring a redshift-evolving star-formation efficiency, against a static baseline model. We demonstrate that the global 21-cm signal is highly degenerate: a static galaxy population can replicate the absorption trough of an evolving population if a steep, mass-dependent X-ray efficiency is invoked to shift intergalactic medium heating toward highly abundant, low-mass halos. However, this degeneracy is definitively broken by the 21-cm power spectrum. Because spatial fluctuations retain a structural memory of the clustering bias of the source halos, the tuned static model predicts a substantially lower power spectrum amplitude across all characteristic peaks. We conclude that combining global and fluctuation measurements is essential to robustly constrain the redshift evolution of high-redshift galaxies.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Naidu, P.A

    R.P. Naidu, P.A. Oesch, P. van Dokkum, E.J. Nelson, K.A. Suess, G. Brammer et al.,Two Remarkably Luminous Galaxy Candidates at z≈10-12 Revealed by JWST, ApJ940(2022) L14 [2207.09434]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Castellano, A

    M. Castellano, A. Fontana, T. Treu, P. Santini, E. Merlin, N. Leethochawalit et al.,Early Results from GLASS-JWST. III. Galaxy Candidates at z 9-15, ApJ938(2022) L15 [2207.09436]. – 19 –

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Finkelstein, M.B

    S.L. Finkelstein, M.B. Bagley, P. Arrabal Haro, M. Dickinson, H.C. Ferguson, J.S. Kartaltepe et al.,A Long Time Ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away: A Candidate z∼12 Galaxy in Early JWST CEERS Imaging, ApJ940(2022) L55 [2207.12474]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Labbé, P

    I. Labbé, P. van Dokkum, E. Nelson, R. Bezanson, K.A. Suess, J. Leja et al.,A population of red candidate massive galaxies 600 Myr after the Big Bang, Nature616(2023) 266 [2207.12446]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    H. Atek, M. Shuntov, L.J. Furtak, J. Richard, J.-P. Kneib, G. Mahler et al.,Revealing galaxy candidates out to z 16 with JWST observations of the lensing cluster SMACS0723, MNRAS 519(2023) 1201 [2207.12338]

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Adams, C.J

    N.J. Adams, C.J. Conselice, L. Ferreira, D. Austin, J.A.A. Trussler, I. Juodžbalis et al., Discovery and properties of ultra-high redshift galaxies (9 < z < 12) in the JWST ERO SMACS 0723 Field, MNRAS518(2023) 4755 [2207.11217]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Bradley, D

    L.D. Bradley, D. Coe, G. Brammer, L.J. Furtak, R.L. Larson, V. Kokorev et al.,High-redshift Galaxy Candidates at z = 9-10 as Revealed by JWST Observations of WHL0137-08, ApJ955 (2023) 13 [2210.01777]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Whitler, R

    L. Whitler, R. Endsley, D.P. Stark, M. Topping, Z. Chen and S. Charlot,On the ages of bright galaxies 500 Myr after the big bang: insights into star formation activity at z≳15 with JWST, MNRAS519(2023) 157 [2208.01599]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    Robertson, B.D

    B. Robertson, B.D. Johnson, S. Tacchella, D.J. Eisenstein, K. Hainline, S. Arribas et al., Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic Star Formation Rate Density 300 Myr after the Big Bang, ApJ970(2024) 31 [2312.10033]

    2024

  2. [10]

    Castellano, A

    M. Castellano, A. Fontana, T. Treu, E. Merlin, P. Santini, P. Bergamini et al.,Early Results from GLASS-JWST. XIX. A High Density of Bright Galaxies at z≈10 in the A2744 Region, ApJ948(2023) L14 [2212.06666]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Finkelstein, M.B

    S.L. Finkelstein, M.B. Bagley, H.C. Ferguson, S.M. Wilkins, J.S. Kartaltepe, C. Papovich et al.,CEERS Key Paper. I. An Early Look into the First 500 Myr of Galaxy Formation with JWST, ApJ946(2023) L13 [2211.05792]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Pérez-González, L

    P.G. Pérez-González, L. Costantin, D. Langeroodi, P. Rinaldi, M. Annunziatella, O. Ilbert et al.,Life beyond 30: Probing the -20 < MUV < -17 Luminosity Function at 8 < z < 13 with the NIRCam Parallel Field of the MIRI Deep Survey, ApJ951(2023) L1 [2302.02429]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Donnan, D.J

    C.T. Donnan, D.J. McLeod, J.S. Dunlop, R.J. McLure, A.C. Carnall, R. Begley et al.,The evolution of the galaxy UV luminosity function at redshifts z = 8 - 15 from deep JWST and ground-based near-infrared imaging, MNRAS518(2023) 6011 [2207.12356]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Harikane, M

    Y. Harikane, M. Ouchi, M. Oguri, Y. Ono, K. Nakajima, Y. Isobe et al.,A Comprehensive Study of Galaxies at z 9-16 Found in the Early JWST Data: Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation History at the Pre-reionization Epoch, ApJS265(2023) 5 [2208.01612]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bouwens, G

    R. Bouwens, G. Illingworth, P. Oesch, M. Stefanon, R. Naidu, I. van Leeuwen et al.,UV luminosity density results at z > 8 from the first JWST/NIRCam fields: limitations of early data sets and the need for spectroscopy, MNRAS523(2023) 1009 [2212.06683]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    McLeod, C.T

    D.J. McLeod, C.T. Donnan, R.J. McLure, J.S. Dunlop, D. Magee, R. Begley et al.,The galaxy UV luminosity function at z≃11 from a suite of public JWST ERS, ERO, and Cycle-1 programs, MNRAS527(2024) 5004 [2304.14469]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Adams, C.J

    N.J. Adams, C.J. Conselice, D. Austin, T. Harvey, L. Ferreira, J. Trussler et al.,EPOCHS. II. The Ultraviolet Luminosity Function from 7.5 < z < 13.5 Using 180 arcmin2 of Deep, Blank Fields from the PEARLS Survey and Public JWST Data, ApJ965(2024) 169 [2304.13721]. – 20 –

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Finkelstein, G.C.K

    S.L. Finkelstein, G.C.K. Leung, M.B. Bagley, M. Dickinson, H.C. Ferguson, C. Papovich et al.,The Complete CEERS Early Universe Galaxy Sample: A Surprisingly Slow Evolution of the Space Density of Bright Galaxies at z∼8.5–14.5, ApJ969(2024) L2 [2311.04279]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Whitler, D.P

    L. Whitler, D.P. Stark, M.W. Topping, B. Robertson, M. Rieke, K.N. Hainline et al.,The zrsim9galaxy UV luminosity function from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey: insights into early galaxy evolution and reionization,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2501.00984 [2501.00984]

    2025

  12. [20]

    Pérez-González, G

    P.G. Pérez-González, G. Östlin, L. Costantin, J. Melinder, S.L. Finkelstein, R.S. Somerville et al.,The rise of the galactic empire: luminosity functions atz∼17andz∼25estimated with the MIDIS+NGDEEP ultra-deep JWST/NIRCam dataset,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.15594 [2503.15594]

    2025

  13. [21]

    Weibel, P.A

    A. Weibel, P.A. Oesch, C.C. Williams, C.K. Jespersen, M. Shuntov, K.E. Whitaker et al., Exploring Cosmic Dawn with PANORAMIC I: The Bright End of the UVLF atz∼9−17, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2507.06292 [2507.06292]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Dekel, K.S

    A. Dekel, K.S. Sarkar, Y. Birnboim, N. Mandelker and Z. Li,Efficient Formation of Massive Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn by Feedback-Free Starbursts,arXiv e-prints(2023) arXiv:2303.04827 [2303.04827]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Z. Li, A. Dekel, K.C. Sarkar, H. Aung, M. Giavalisco, N. Mandelker et al.,Feedback-free starbursts at cosmic dawn: Observable predictions for JWST, A&A690(2024) A108 [2311.14662]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Y. Qin, S. Balu and J.S.B. Wyithe,Implications of z≳12 JWST galaxies for galaxy formation at high redshift, MNRAS526(2023) 1324 [2305.17959]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Chakraborty and T.R

    A. Chakraborty and T.R. Choudhury,Modelling the star-formation activity and ionizing properties of high-redshift galaxies, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024(2024) 078 [2404.02879]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Chakraborty and T.R

    A. Chakraborty and T.R. Choudhury,Probing reionization-era galaxies with JWST UV luminosity functions and large-scale clustering, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2026(2026) 008 [2503.07590]

    2026

  19. [27]

    Mirocha and S.R

    J. Mirocha and S.R. Furlanetto,Balancing the efficiency and stochasticity of star formation with dust extinction inz >10galaxies observed by JWST, MNRAS519(2023) 843 [2208.12826]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Mason, M

    C.A. Mason, M. Trenti and T. Treu,The brightest galaxies at cosmic dawn, MNRAS521 (2023) 497 [2207.14808]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    X. Shen, M. Vogelsberger, M. Boylan-Kolchin, S. Tacchella and R. Kannan,The impact of UV variability on the abundance of bright galaxies at z≥9, MNRAS525(2023) 3254 [2305.05679]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Sun, C.-A

    G. Sun, C.-A. Faucher-Giguère, C.C. Hayward, X. Shen, A. Wetzel and R.K. Cochrane, Bursty Star Formation Naturally Explains the Abundance of Bright Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn, ApJ955(2023) L35 [2307.15305]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Pallottini and A

    A. Pallottini and A. Ferrara,Stochastic star formation in early galaxies: JWST implications, arXiv e-prints(2023) arXiv:2307.03219 [2307.03219]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Gelli, C

    V. Gelli, C. Mason and C.C. Hayward,The Impact of Mass-dependent Stochasticity at Cosmic Dawn, ApJ975(2024) 192 [2405.13108]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kravtsov and V

    A. Kravtsov and V. Belokurov,Stochastic star formation and the abundance ofz >10 UV-bright galaxies,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2405.04578 [2405.04578]. – 21 –

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Inayoshi, Y

    K. Inayoshi, Y. Harikane, A.K. Inoue, W. Li and L.C. Ho,A Lower Bound of Star Formation Activity in Ultra-high-redshift Galaxies Detected with JWST: Implications for Stellar Populations and Radiation Sources, ApJ938(2022) L10 [2208.06872]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Trinca, R

    A. Trinca, R. Schneider, R. Valiante, L. Graziani, A. Ferrotti, K. Omukai et al.,Exploring the nature of UV-brightzrsim10galaxies detected by JWST: star formation, black hole accretion, or a non-universal IMF?,arXiv e-prints(2023) arXiv:2305.04944 [2305.04944]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Ventura, Y

    E.M. Ventura, Y. Qin, S. Balu and J.S.B. Wyithe,Semi-analytic modelling of Pop. III star formation and metallicity evolution - I. Impact on the UV luminosity functions at z = 9-16, MNRAS529(2024) 628 [2401.07396]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Yung, R.S

    L.Y.A. Yung, R.S. Somerville, S.L. Finkelstein, S.M. Wilkins and J.P. Gardner,Are the ultra-high-redshift galaxies at z > 10 surprising in the context of standard galaxy formation models?, MNRAS527(2024) 5929 [2304.04348]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Hutter, E.R

    A. Hutter, E.R. Cueto, P. Dayal, S. Gottlöber, M. Trebitsch and G. Yepes,ASTRAEUS: X. Indications of a top-heavy initial mass function in highly star-forming galaxies from JWST observations at z > 10, A&A694(2025) A254 [2410.00730]

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    S. Lu, C.S. Frenk, S. Bose, C.G. Lacey, S. Cole, C.M. Baugh et al.,A comparison of pre-existingΛCDM predictions with the abundance of JWST galaxies at high redshift, MNRAS 536(2025) 1018 [2406.02672]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Ferrara, A

    A. Ferrara, A. Pallottini and P. Dayal,On the stunning abundance of super-early, luminous galaxies revealed by JWST, MNRAS522(2023) 3986 [2208.00720]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Ziparo, A

    F. Ziparo, A. Ferrara, L. Sommovigo and M. Kohandel,Blue monsters. Why are JWST super-early, massive galaxies so blue?, MNRAS520(2023) 2445 [2209.06840]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Ferrara,Super-early JWST galaxies, outflows, and Lyαvisibility in the Epoch of Reionization, A&A684(2024) A207 [2310.12197]

    A. Ferrara,Super-early JWST galaxies, outflows, and Lyαvisibility in the Epoch of Reionization, A&A684(2024) A207 [2310.12197]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Ferrara, A

    A. Ferrara, A. Pallottini and L. Sommovigo,Blue monsters at z > 10: Where all their dust has gone, A&A694(2025) A286 [2410.19042]

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Pacucci, P

    F. Pacucci, P. Dayal, Y. Harikane, A.K. Inoue and A. Loeb,Are the newly-discovered z 13 drop-out sources starburst galaxies or quasars?, MNRAS514(2022) L6 [2201.00823]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Hegde, M.M

    S. Hegde, M.M. Wyatt and S.R. Furlanetto,A hidden population of active galactic nuclei can explain the overabundance of luminous z > 10 objects observed by JWST, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024(2024) 025 [2405.01629]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Fujimoto, B

    S. Fujimoto, B. Wang, J.R. Weaver, V. Kokorev, H. Atek, R. Bezanson et al.,UNCOVER: A NIRSpec Census of Lensed Galaxies at z = 8.50–13.08 Probing a High-AGN Fraction and Ionized Bubbles in the Shadow, ApJ977(2024) 250 [2308.11609]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Bowman, A.E.E

    J.D. Bowman, A.E.E. Rogers, R.A. Monsalve, T.J. Mozdzen and N. Mahesh,An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum, Nature555(2018) 67 [1810.05912]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Singh, N.T

    S. Singh, N.T. Jishnu, R. Subrahmanyan, N. Udaya Shankar, B.S. Girish, A. Raghunathan et al.,On the detection of a cosmic dawn signal in the radio background,Nature Astronomy6 (2022) 607 [2112.06778]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    de Lera Acedo, D.I.L

    E. de Lera Acedo, D.I.L. de Villiers, N. Razavi-Ghods, W. Handley, A. Fialkov, A. Magro et al.,The REACH radiometer for detecting the 21-cm hydrogen signal from redshift z≈ 7.5-28,Nature Astronomy6(2022) 984 [2210.07409]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Monsalve, C

    R.A. Monsalve, C. Altamirano, V. Bidula, R. Bustos, C.H. Bye, H.C. Chiang et al.,Mapper of the IGM spin temperature: instrument overview, MNRAS530(2024) 4125 [2309.02996]. – 22 –

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    P. Bull, A. El-Makadema, H. Garsden, J. Edgley, N. Roddis, J. Chluba et al.,RHINO: a large horn antenna for detecting the 21 cm global signal,RAS Techniques and Instruments4(2025) rzaf046 [2410.00076]

    2025

  44. [52]

    Philip, Z

    L. Philip, Z. Abdurashidova, H.C. Chiang, N. Ghazi, A. Gumba, H.M. Heilgendorff et al., Probing Radio Intensity at High-Z from Marion: 2017 Instrument,Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation8(2019) 1950004 [1806.09531]

    2019 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Paciga, J.G

    G. Paciga, J.G. Albert, K. Bandura, T.-C. Chang, Y. Gupta, C. Hirata et al.,A simulation-calibrated limit on the H I power spectrum from the GMRT Epoch of Reionization experiment, MNRAS433(2013) 639 [1301.5906]

    2013 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Tingay, R

    S.J. Tingay, R. Goeke, J.D. Bowman, D. Emrich, S.M. Ord, D.A. Mitchell et al.,The Murchison Widefield Array: The Square Kilometre Array Precursor at Low Radio Frequencies, PASA30(2013) e007 [1206.6945]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [55]

    van Haarlem, M.W

    M.P. van Haarlem, M.W. Wise, A.W. Gunst, G. Heald, J.P. McKean, J.W.T. Hessels et al., LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray, A&A556(2013) A2 [1305.3550]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    DeBoer, A.R

    D.R. DeBoer, A.R. Parsons, J.E. Aguirre, P. Alexander, Z.S. Ali, A.P. Beardsley et al., Hydrogen epoch of reionization array (hera),Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific129(2017) 045001

    2017

  49. [57]

    Bernardi, D

    CD Science Working Group, G. Bernardi, D. Breitman, A. Datta, A. Fialkov, L.V.E. Koopmans et al.,Overview of 21cm Experiments at high redshift with SKAO,arXiv e-prints(2026) arXiv:2606.26435 [2606.26435]

    2026 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Furlanetto, S.P

    S.R. Furlanetto, S.P. Oh and F.H. Briggs,Cosmology at low frequencies: The 21 cm transition and the high-redshift Universe, Phys. Rep.433(2006) 181 [astro-ph/0608032]

    2006 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Pritchard and A

    J.R. Pritchard and A. Loeb,21 cm cosmology in the 21st century,Reports on Progress in Physics75(2012) 086901 [1109.6012]

    2012 arXiv

  52. [60]

    J. Park, A. Mesinger, B. Greig and N. Gillet,Inferring the astrophysics of reionization and cosmic dawn from galaxy luminosity functions and the 21-cm signal, MNRAS484(2019) 933 [1809.08995]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Y. Qin, A. Mesinger, J. Park, B. Greig and J.B. Muñoz,A tale of two sites - I. Inferring the properties of minihalo-hosted galaxies from current observations, MNRAS495(2020) 123 [2003.04442]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Muñoz, Y

    J.B. Muñoz, Y. Qin, A. Mesinger, S.G. Murray, B. Greig and C. Mason,The impact of the first galaxies on cosmic dawn and reionization, MNRAS511(2022) 3657 [2110.13919]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Nikolić, A

    I. Nikolić, A. Mesinger, J.E. Davies and D. Prelogović,The importance of stochasticity in determining galaxy emissivities and UV LFs during cosmic dawn and reionization, A&A692 (2024) A142 [2406.15237]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Bevins, S

    H.T.J. Bevins, S. Heimersheim, I. Abril-Cabezas, A. Fialkov, E. de Lera Acedo, W. Handley et al.,Joint analysis constraints on the physics of the first galaxies with low-frequency radio astronomy data, MNRAS527(2024) 813 [2301.03298]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Pochinda, T

    S. Pochinda, T. Gessey-Jones, H.T.J. Bevins, A. Fialkov, S. Heimersheim, I. Abril-Cabezas et al.,Constraining the properties of Population III galaxies with multiwavelength observations, MNRAS531(2024) 1113 [2312.08095]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Dhandha, A

    J. Dhandha, A. Fialkov, T. Gessey-Jones, H.T.J. Bevins, S. Tacchella, S. Pochinda et al., Exploiting synergies between JWST and cosmic 21-cm observations to uncover star formation in the early Universe, MNRAS542(2025) 2292 [2503.21687]

    2025 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Dhandha, A

    J. Dhandha, A. Fialkov, T. Gessey-Jones, H.T.J. Bevins, S. Tacchella, S. Pochinda et al., Narrowing the discovery space of the cosmological 21-cm signal using multi-wavelength constraints, MNRAS544(2025) 1608 [2508.13761]. – 23 –

    2025

  60. [68]

    Davies, A

    J.E. Davies, A. Mesinger and S.G. Murray,Efficient simulation of discrete galaxy populations and associated radiation fields over the first billion years, A&A701(2025) A236 [2504.17254]

    2025

  61. [69]

    Semelin, F

    B. Semelin, F. Combes and S. Baek,Lyman-alpha radiative transfer during the epoch of reionization: contribution to 21-cm signal fluctuations, A&A474(2007) 365 [0707.2483]

    2007 arXiv

  62. [70]

    S. Baek, P. Di Matteo, B. Semelin, F. Combes and Y. Revaz,The simulated 21 cm signal during the epoch of reionization: full modeling of the Ly-αpumping, A&A495(2009) 389 [0808.0925]

    2009 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Semelin, E

    B. Semelin, E. Eames, F. Bolgar and M. Caillat,21SSD: a public data base of simulated 21-cm signals from the epoch of reionization, MNRAS472(2017) 4508 [1707.02073]

    2017 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Mesinger, S

    A. Mesinger, S. Furlanetto and R. Cen,21CMFAST: a fast, seminumerical simulation of the high-redshift 21-cm signal, MNRAS411(2011) 955 [1003.3878]

    2011 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Santos, L

    M.G. Santos, L. Ferramacho, M.B. Silva, A. Amblard and A. Cooray,Fast large volume simulations of the 21-cm signal from the reionization and pre-reionization epochs, MNRAS 406(2010) 2421 [0911.2219]

    2010 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Fialkov, R

    A. Fialkov, R. Barkana, D. Tseliakhovich and C.M. Hirata,Impact of the relative motion between the dark matter and baryons on the first stars: semi-analytical modelling, MNRAS 424(2012) 1335 [1110.2111]

    2012 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Visbal, R

    E. Visbal, R. Barkana, A. Fialkov, D. Tseliakhovich and C.M. Hirata,The signature of the first stars in atomic hydrogen at redshift 20, Nature487(2012) 70 [1201.1005]

    2012 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Thomas, S

    R.M. Thomas, S. Zaroubi, B. Ciardi, A.H. Pawlik, P. Labropoulos, V. Jelić et al.,Fast large-scale reionization simulations, MNRAS393(2009) 32 [0809.1326]

    2009 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Ghara, G

    R. Ghara, G. Mellema, S.K. Giri, T.R. Choudhury, K.K. Datta and S. Majumdar,Prediction of the 21-cm signal from reionization: comparison between 3D and 1D radiative transfer schemes, MNRAS476(2018) 1741 [1710.09397]

    2018 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Schaeffer, S.K

    T. Schaeffer, S.K. Giri and A. Schneider,BEORN: a fast and flexible framework to simulate the epoch of reionization and cosmic dawn, MNRAS526(2023) 2942 [2305.15466]

    2023 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Mirocha,Decoding the X-ray properties of pre-reionization era sources, MNRAS443(2014) 1211 [1406.4120]

    J. Mirocha,Decoding the X-ray properties of pre-reionization era sources, MNRAS443(2014) 1211 [1406.4120]

    2014 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Mittal, G

    S. Mittal, G. Kulkarni and P. Sims,ECHO21: a tool for modelling global 21-cm signal from dark ages to reionization,RAS Techniques and Instruments5(2026) rzag001 [2503.11762]

    2026

  73. [81]

    Raste and S

    J. Raste and S. Sethi,An Analytic Formulation of the 21 cm Signal from the Early Phase of the Epoch of Reionization, ApJ860(2018) 55

    2018

  74. [82]

    Raste and S

    J. Raste and S. Sethi,Analytic formulation of 21 cm signal from cosmic dawn: Lyα fluctuations, ApJ876(2019) 56

    2019

  75. [83]

    Muñoz,An effective model for the cosmic-dawn 21-cm signal, MNRAS523(2023) 2587 [2302.08506]

    J.B. Muñoz,An effective model for the cosmic-dawn 21-cm signal, MNRAS523(2023) 2587 [2302.08506]

    2023 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Choudhury and A

    T.R. Choudhury and A. Paranjape,Photon number conservation and the large-scale 21 cm power spectrum in seminumerical models of reionization, MNRAS481(2018) 3821 [1807.00836]

    2018 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Choudhury and A

    T.R. Choudhury and A. Chakraborty,Capturing small-scale reionization physics: A sub-grid model for photon sinks with SCRIPT, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025(2025) 114 [2504.03384]

    2025

  78. [86]

    Planck Collaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, A&A641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]. – 24 –

    2020 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Hahn and T

    O. Hahn and T. Abel,Multi-scale initial conditions for cosmological simulations, MNRAS 415(2011) 2101 [1103.6031]

    2011 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Sheth and G

    R.K. Sheth and G. Tormen,An excursion set model of hierarchical clustering: ellipsoidal collapse and the moving barrier, MNRAS329(2002) 61 [astro-ph/0105113]

    2002 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Pritchard and S.R

    J.R. Pritchard and S.R. Furlanetto,Descending from on high: Lyman series cascades and spin-kinetic temperature coupling in the 21cm line,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.367(2006) 1057 [astro-ph/0508381]

    2006 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Chen and J

    X. Chen and J. Miralda-Escudé,The Spin-Kinetic Temperature Coupling and the Heating Rate due to LyαScattering before Reionization: Predictions for 21 Centimeter Emission and Absorption, ApJ602(2004) 1 [astro-ph/0303395]

    2004 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Raste, A.K

    J. Raste, A.K. Sarkar and S.K. Sethi,Thermal Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium due to LyαPhotons during the Cosmic Dawn, ApJ976(2024) 236 [2406.16542]

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Raste and S.K

    J. Raste and S.K. Sethi,21 cm Signal from the Thermal Evolution of Lyαduring Cosmic Dawn, ApJ996(2026) 44 [2506.12827]

    2026

  85. [93]

    Wouthuysen,On the excitation mechanism of the 21-cm (radio-frequency) interstellar hydrogen emission line., AJ57(1952) 31

    S.A. Wouthuysen,On the excitation mechanism of the 21-cm (radio-frequency) interstellar hydrogen emission line., AJ57(1952) 31

    1952

  86. [94]

    Field,Excitation of the Hydrogen 21-CM Line,Proceedings of the IRE46(1958) 240

    G.B. Field,Excitation of the Hydrogen 21-CM Line,Proceedings of the IRE46(1958) 240

    1958

  87. [95]

    Mineo, M

    S. Mineo, M. Gilfanov and R. Sunyaev,X-ray emission from star-forming galaxies - I. High-mass X-ray binaries, MNRAS419(2012) 2095 [1105.4610]

    2012 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Pritchard and S.R

    J.R. Pritchard and S.R. Furlanetto,21-cm fluctuations from inhomogeneous X-ray heating before reionization, MNRAS376(2007) 1680 [astro-ph/0607234]

    2007 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Shull and M.E

    J.M. Shull and M.E. van Steenberg,X-ray secondary heating and ionization in quasar emission-line clouds, ApJ298(1985) 268

    1985

  90. [98]

    Venkatesan, M.L

    A. Venkatesan, M.L. Giroux and J.M. Shull,Heating and Ionization of the Intergalactic Medium by an Early X-Ray Background, ApJ563(2001) 1 [astro-ph/0108168]

    2001 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Furlanetto and S.J

    S. Furlanetto and S.J. Stoever,Secondary ionization and heating by fast electrons,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.404(2010) 1869 [0910.4410]

    2010 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Bouwens, P.A

    R.J. Bouwens, P.A. Oesch, M. Stefanon, G. Illingworth, I. Labbé, N. Reddy et al.,New Determinations of the UV Luminosity Functions from z 9 to 2 Show a Remarkable Consistency with Halo Growth and a Constant Star Formation Efficiency, AJ162(2021) 47 [2102.07775]

    2021 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Bouwens, G

    R.J. Bouwens, G. Illingworth, R.S. Ellis, P. Oesch and M. Stefanon,z 2-9 Galaxies Magnified by the Hubble Frontier Field Clusters. II. Luminosity Functions and Constraints on a Faint-end Turnover, ApJ940(2022) 55 [2205.11526]

    2022 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Donnan, R.J

    C.T. Donnan, R.J. McLure, J.S. Dunlop, D.J. McLeod, D. Magee, K.Z. Arellano-Córdova et al.,JWST PRIMER: a new multifield determination of the evolving galaxy UV luminosity function at redshifts z = 9 - 15, MNRAS533(2024) 3222 [2403.03171]

    2024 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Gaikwad, M

    P. Gaikwad, M. Rauch, M.G. Haehnelt, E. Puchwein, J.S. Bolton, L.C. Keating et al.,Probing the thermal state of the intergalactic medium at z > 5 with the transmission spikes in high-resolution Lyαforest spectra, MNRAS494(2020) 5091 [2001.10018]

    2020 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Zhu, G.D

    Y. Zhu, G.D. Becker, H.M. Christenson, A. D’Aloisio, S.E.I. Bosman, T. Bakx et al.,Probing Ultralate Reionization: Direct Measurements of the Mean Free Path over 5 < z < 6, ApJ955 (2023) 115 [2308.04614]

    2023 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Wyithe and J.S

    J.S.B. Wyithe and J.S. Bolton,Near-zone sizes and the rest-frame extreme ultraviolet spectral index of the highest redshift quasars, MNRAS412(2011) 1926 [1008.1107]. – 25 –

    2011 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Calverley, G.D

    A.P. Calverley, G.D. Becker, M.G. Haehnelt and J.S. Bolton,Measurements of the ultraviolet background at 4.6 < z < 6.4 using the quasar proximity effect, MNRAS412(2011) 2543 [1011.5850]

    2011 arXiv

  99. [107]

    D’Aloisio, M

    A. D’Aloisio, M. McQuinn, F.B. Davies and S.R. Furlanetto,Large fluctuations in the high-redshift metagalactic ionizing background, MNRAS473(2018) 560 [1611.02711]

    2018 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Gaikwad, M.G

    P. Gaikwad, M.G. Haehnelt, F.B. Davies, S.E.I. Bosman, M. Molaro, G. Kulkarni et al., Measuring the photoionization rate, neutral fraction, and mean free path of H I ionizing photons at 4.9≤z≤6.0 from a large sample of XShooter and ESI spectra, MNRAS525 (2023) 4093 [2304.02038]

    2023 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Chakraborty, T.R

    A. Chakraborty, T.R. Choudhury, K.K. Datta, P. Dayal, J. Dhandha, S. Gagnon-Hartman et al.,Square Kilometer Array Synergies for the Epoch of Reionization and Cosmic Dawn, arXiv e-prints(2026) arXiv:2606.30947 [2606.30947]. – 26 –

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.