Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 202 references

Public Trader Identity: Adverse Selection and Return Predictability

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A decentralized exchange's public wallet identities improve short-horizon price forecasts by 13.2%.

desk verdict Careful, credible evidence that wallet identities on a DEX carry short-horizon predictive content beyond the anonymous book, though the toxicity-vs-size placebo is not size-matched and the authors admit as much. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04373 v2 pith:6UQDX35W submitted 2026-08-05 q-fin.TR q-fin.PR

Daojing Zhai This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-fin.TRq-fin.PR
keywords traderidentityadverseselectionwallettoxicityreturnpredictabilitylimitorderbookdecentralizedexchangehigh-frequencyforecastingHyperliquid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the persistent pseudonymous wallet addresses that a decentralized exchange publishes alongside every order reveal which market participants are expensive to trade against, and whether that identity information sharpens short-horizon price forecasts. It reconstructs the full limit order book of Hyperliquid from 17.1 billion Level-4 messages and scores 2,314 wallets by the ten-second price move that follows their aggressive orders. The paper reports that this toxicity ranking persists across adjacent ten-day windows (rank correlation 0.52) and that adding features built from the previously scored top-decile wallets to a prespecified anonymous benchmark raises out-of-sample $R^2$ for one-second returns from 10.88% to 12.31%, a 13.2% gain with $t=9.2$. The exercise replicates on an independently collected December 2025 sample, and the gain survives a matched-placebo comparison against 200 equally active but non-toxic wallet cohorts. If true, public wallet histories carry short-horizon price information that anonymous order-book data leave unmeasured.

What carries the argument

The central object is the wallet toxicity score, a notional-weighted ten-second markout over a frozen ten-day scoring window, which turns each persistent wallet address into a scalar ranking. The identity-augmented model then constructs eleven features from the top-decile toxic cohort's live activity, including its quote-update order-flow imbalance, its signed taker notional, its net distinct buyer count, its share of best-quote depth, and its contribution to best-quote imbalance, added to an anonymous benchmark of prices, quoted spread, and aggregate order flow. The evaluation protocol freezes the score before model fitting and runs one out-of-sample pass on a later week, so the forecast gain measures information carried by wallet identity rather than in-sample fit.

What would settle it

Draw a non-toxic wallet cohort with the same number of wallets and the same notional and order-count distributions as the actual toxic cohort, and rebuild the eleven identity features on it; if its one-second out-of-sample $R^2$ increment reaches the toxic cohort's 1.44 percentage points, the claim that the toxicity ranking itself carries the information would be overturned.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that informativeness is a persistent attribute of a wallet address, not just of a trade or an anonymous order-flow aggregate, and that this persistence is economically visible in out-of-sample return prediction. Wallets are ranked once on the notional-weighted ten-second markout of their aggressive orders during July 1–10; the top decile is called toxic. The same wallets remain costly to trade against in the next ten days, and their live order and quote activity, added as eleven features to a ten-variable anonymous benchmark, raises one-second out-of-sample $R^2$ from 10.88% to 12.31% under a ridge model and to 20.65% under gradient-boosted trees. The toxic cohort's increment is 1.6 times the largest of 200 activity-matched placebo cohorts at one second and exceeds every draw through ten seconds. Measured at actual fills rather than at every 100-millisecond stamp, the identity increment is larger still: 2.47 percentage points of one-second $R^2$ against 1.43 across the grid, and it is not removed by revealing the arriving order's side or by restricting to fills followed by no other parent-order trade.

Load-bearing premise

The matched placebo cohorts that separate toxicity from raw size and activity are smaller than the actual toxic cohort, so the central comparison assumes that the remaining size-and-activity gap, rather than toxicity itself, is not what produces the forecast gain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Market makers can condition on wallet histories in real time, because the same accounts that were costly to trade against remain costly several days later.
  • Anonymous order-book models miss a measurable component of short-horizon return predictability: identity adds 13.2% relative $R^2$ at one second even after including standard price, quote, and flow predictors.
  • The information is fast-moving rather than a slow persistent skill: the identity gain decays from 18.7% at 200 milliseconds to 3.0% at thirty seconds under ridge, so wallet identity matters most for high-frequency quoting decisions.
  • The result generalizes beyond one dataset: the December 2025 sample reproduces the persistence and the forecast gain with the same design and no retuning.
  • Toxicity, not just size or activity, drives the forecast gain: the toxic cohort beats all 200 activity-matched cohorts through ten seconds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If public wallet identities carry this information on Hyperliquid, other venues that hide counterparties may be mispricing adverse selection relative to their informed flow; the paper's design could be exported to any venue that later publishes identifiers.
  • The persistence and forecast gains imply that the value of anonymity is not merely theoretical: a decentralized exchange that strips anonymity may redistribute spread revenue from toxic to non-toxic wallets, which could be tested by comparing maker fill rates and realized PnL around an anonymity change.
  • A natural extension is a dynamic maker strategy that quotes more aggressively when toxic wallets are absent and widens when they appear; the paper's Appendix D conversion is frictionless, so a realistic strategy with queue priority and fees would test how much of the $R^2$ gain is capturable.
  • Wallet-level cancellations and rejected orders, which the paper flags as future work, may carry additional signal beyond executed aggressive orders; a testable extension is to score wallets on rejected-order activity in the same frozen-window design.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper uses Hyperliquid's public Level-4 record (17.1 billion messages, July 2026) to reconstruct the full-depth limit order book with persistent wallet identifiers. It scores 2,314 wallets by notional-weighted ten-second markouts of aggressive orders in a frozen July 1–10 window, ranks them into deciles, and tests whether live quote/flow features of the top-decile 'toxic' wallets add out-of-sample predictive content for 0.2s–30s midpoint returns beyond a prespecified anonymous benchmark. The main reported results are: (i) rank persistence of 0.52 across adjacent ten-day windows; (ii) at the 1s horizon the identity block raises ridge R2 from 10.88% to 12.31% (t = 9.2), with the toxic-cohort increment 1.6 times the largest of 200 activity-matched placebo cohorts; (iii) the increment is 2.47 pp at realized fills rather than 1.43 pp on the full grid, and it survives revealing the arriving order's side and restricting to fills followed by no other parent order; and (iv) the design, applied without retuning, reproduces the prediction result on an independent December 2025 dataset.

Significance. The paper's strengths are its out-of-sample discipline and transparency: scores are frozen before fitting, the benchmark is prespecified and grounded in standard microstructure predictors, features are embargoed in a robustness check, placebos are matched on activity cells, and the December 2025 replication is based on independently collected data. If the equal-size placebo concern is resolved, the paper would provide one of the cleanest measurements available of the incremental predictive value of public wallet identity on a decentralized exchange, with direct implications for adverse-selection measurement and market-making. The R2 gains are economically meaningful at high frequency, and the paper is appropriately careful about not translating them directly into implementable profits.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.2 and Table B.5 (with Table C.4)] The matched-wallet placebo is the primary defense for the claim that toxicity, not size or activity, drives the forecast gain, but the placebo cohorts are not equal in size to the real cohort. Exact-cell matching without replacement exhausts non-toxic donors, so the top-decile draws contain 154 wallets against 253 in the real cohort (and 388 against 505 for the quintile in the December replication). Because the identity block includes size-sensitive variables (hotBreadth, hotShare, hotContrib), a smaller cohort mechanically has less breadth and depth to feed the model, so the observed max/real ratios (61% at 1s in July, 62–83% in December) cannot separate a toxicity effect from a size/activity ceiling. The note that the rank is 'descriptive rather than an equal-size randomization test' concedes exactly the assumption on which the headline 1.6× comparison rests. Please run an equal-size placebo (sampling with replacement, matching with replacement, or a coarser matching grid that yields 253-wallet draws) and report the rank of the real cohort against those draws.
  2. [Section 4.1, Table 4, and Table A.1] The headline t-statistics are computed from only seven daily out-of-sample MSE differences, and the evaluation week contains a documented large gap on July 27 (a 28,326-block gap, 9.4% absent block heights, with the oracle gate closed for 1.83% of evaluation coin-time). Since one of the seven days is incomplete, the point estimate and t-statistic for the headline 13.2% gain should be reported with July 27 excluded, and ideally day by day. The December replication qualitatively supports the result, but it does not establish that the July magnitude is not driven by a few days.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The strings 'TW AP', 'T AP', and related forms should be typeset as 'TWAP' (e.g., Section 3.2, Table 2 notes, Section 4.3); the spacing appears to be a LaTeX artifact.
  2. [Abstract and Section 4.2] The t-statistics are seven-day paired MSE t-statistics, not conventional regression t-statistics; please define this convention at first use so readers do not misinterpret the magnitudes.
  3. [Figure 5] Panel (b) appears to be missing its plotted series in the current text, leaving only the caption to identify the top-quintile comparison; please check the figure artifact.
  4. [Appendix A.1] The description of the July 27 collection gap is clear and welcome, but the forecasting sample is defined as July 21–27; the text should state explicitly whether the July 27 gap is included in the reported R2 numbers or whether those numbers already exclude the gapped interval.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the wallet ranking is frozen before fitting, identity features are built from live activity, and the prediction is evaluated out of sample.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The wallet toxicity score alpha_w (Eq. 2) is computed from notional-weighted ten-second markouts in a frozen July 1-10 scoring window; the ranking is then frozen, identity features are constructed from subsequent live quote and flow activity restricted to the top decile, models are fit on July 11-20, and evaluation occurs on July 21-27 against a forward midpoint return target. No fitted value is fed back as a target, the score itself is not a regressor (only the cohort selection uses it), and the prediction increment is measured against a prespecified anonymous benchmark. The matched-wallet placebo, although not equal-size due to donor-pool limits, is a disclosed robustness check rather than a construction that forces the toxic cohort to win. Citations to Albers et al., Barone and Lillo, and Cartea et al. are external data/method sources, not self-citations by this paper's author, and none is used to forbid alternatives or define away the result. The only self-referential element noted by the reader, that toxicity is defined from price moves and thus persistence is partly price-impact persistence, is an empirical persistence claim, not a definitional equivalence. I find no circular step that reduces a prediction to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is an empirical study, not a derivation. The listed parameters are design choices made by the author or tuned on the fitting window; none is fitted to the evaluation target. The axioms are the data and measurement assumptions on which the entire analysis rests.

free parameters (6)
  • Markout evaluation horizon = 10 seconds
    Chosen as the benchmark horizon for the wallet score; the paper also traces horizons from 0.5s to 5 minutes.
  • Scoring window length = 10 days (July 1-10, 2026)
    Chosen as the frozen ranking window; rolling ten-day windows are used as a robustness check.
  • Order-count threshold = 100 qualifying aggressive orders
    Defines which wallets receive a score; this threshold affects the set of 2,314 scored wallets.
  • Tail cut for toxic cohort = Top decile (231 wallets)
    Primary cohort; top quintile used as an alternative. The cut is chosen after inspecting persistence, introducing a selection degree of freedom.
  • Grid interval for forecasting = 100 milliseconds
    Chosen to align with the block clock; 91.3% of inter-block gaps are below 100ms.
  • Ridge penalty and tree hyperparameters = Selected by expanding-day validation on the fitting window
    Model complexity is tuned on July 11-20 (or Dec 11-20), which is a legitimate validation procedure but still a data-dependent choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The reconstructed Level-4 order book is faithful to the true venue state.
    The oracle gate validates the midpoint, not the full book, so latent resting-order errors can survive while the midpoint agrees. Disclosed in Appendix A.2.
  • domain assumption Aggressive-order markout is a meaningful measure of informed trading.
    Markouts can reflect the order's own price impact rather than private information; the paper partially addresses this with peer-adjusted scores and a TWAP benchmark (Section 3.2, Appendix B.1).
  • domain assumption A wallet address is a persistent behavioral entity across time.
    One entity may control several wallets and one wallet may aggregate several principals; the paper explicitly labels the measure behavioral, not legal-personal (Section 2, footnote 1).
  • domain assumption The prespecified anonymous benchmark is an adequate summary of public information.
    The ten benchmark variables are drawn from established microstructure predictors, but any omitted anonymous predictor could in principle absorb part of the identity increment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Public Trader Identity: Adverse Selection and Return Predictability." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6UQDX35W

@misc{pith2026260804373,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Public Trader Identity: Adverse Selection and Return Predictability},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6UQDX35W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04373}
}
abstract

Informed traders are supposed to need anonymity: they profit by hiding among the uninformed. A decentralized exchange now publishes the counterparty. Every committed order, cancellation, rejection, and fill carries a persistent pseudonymous wallet address. We reconstruct the full-depth limit order book from a record of 17.1 billion messages and 14.3 million aggressive orders by 147,113 wallets, covering $84.3 billion in taker notional. We report three findings. First, informativeness is a persistent wallet attribute. Wallets ranked by the price movement following their aggressive orders retain that ordering across adjacent ten-day windows, with a rank correlation of 0.52. Second, the ranking predicts returns. Adding the live activity of the highest-ranked wallets to a standard anonymous benchmark of prices, quotes, and order flow raises the out-of-sample R2 for one-second returns to 12.31%, a 13.2% gain (t = 9.2) that is 1.6 times the largest of 200 activity-matched placebo cohorts. Third, measured at realized trades rather than at every sampled moment, the increment grows from 1.43 to 2.47 percentage points of R2. Public wallet histories therefore carry short-horizon price information that anonymous order-book data leave unmeasured.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04373 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Committed blocks and inter-block timing. Panel (a) places four consecutive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Persistence and horizon profile of wallet toxicity. Panel (a) compares scoring- and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Out-of-sample [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Drop-one contributions at the one-second ridge benchmark. Panel (a) compares [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Identity increment for the toxic cohort against the maximum across 200 activity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

202 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Admati and Paul Pfleiderer

    Anat R. Admati and Paul Pfleiderer. Sunshine trading and financial market equilibrium. Review of Financial Studies, 4 0 (3): 0 443--481, 1991. doi:10.1093/rfs/4.3.443

    work page doi:10.1093/rfs/4.3.443 1991

  2. [2]

    Shestopaloff

    Jakob Albers, Mihai Cucuringu, Sam Howison, and Alexander Y. Shestopaloff. The market maker's dilemma: Navigating the fill probability vs.\ post-fill returns trade-off. Working paper, arXiv:2502.18625, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Shestopaloff

    Jakob Albers, Mihai Cucuringu, Sam Howison, and Alexander Y. Shestopaloff. An open book: L evel 4 order book data from the H yperliquid exchange. SSRN Working Paper 6465720; dataset DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18184441, 2026 a

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.18184441 2026

  4. [4]

    Shestopaloff

    Jakob Albers, Mihai Cucuringu, Sam Howison, and Alexander Y. Shestopaloff. The price impact of nothing: Rejected orders as predictors of future returns. SSRN Working Paper 6250378, 2026 b

    2026

  5. [5]

    Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, Francis X

    Torben G. Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, Francis X. Diebold, and Paul Labys. Modeling and forecasting realized volatility. Econometrica, 71 0 (2): 0 579--625, 2003. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00418

    arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    High-frequency trading in a limit order book

    Marco Avellaneda and Sasha Stoikov. High-frequency trading in a limit order book. Quantitative Finance, 8 0 (3): 0 217--224, 2008. doi:10.1080/14697680701381228

    doi:10.1080/14697680701381228 2008

  7. [7]

    The only game in town

    Walter Bagehot. The only game in town. Financial Analysts Journal, 27 0 (2): 0 12--14, 1971. doi:10.2469/faj.v27.n2.12

    work page doi:10.2469/faj.v27.n2.12 1971

  8. [8]

    Barber, Yi-Tsung Lee, Yu-Jane Liu, and Terrance Odean

    Brad M. Barber, Yi-Tsung Lee, Yu-Jane Liu, and Terrance Odean. The cross-section of speculator skill: Evidence from day trading. Journal of Financial Markets, 18: 0 1--24, 2014

    2014

Show all 202 references
  1. [9]

    On the quality of cryptocurrency markets: Centralized versus decentralized exchanges

    Andrea Barbon and Angelo Ranaldo. On the quality of cryptocurrency markets: Centralized versus decentralized exchanges. Management Science, 2025. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2024.07703. Forthcoming; articles in advance

    2025

  2. [10]

    Brokers and order flow leakage: Evidence from fire sales

    Andrea Barbon, Marco Di Maggio, Francesco Franzoni, and Augustin Landier. Brokers and order flow leakage: Evidence from fire sales. Journal of Finance, 74 0 (6): 0 2707--2749, 2019. doi:10.1111/jofi.12840

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    o rn Hagstr \

    Matthew Baron, Jonathan Brogaard, Bj \"o rn Hagstr \"o mer, and Andrei Kirilenko. Risk and return in high-frequency trading. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 54 0 (3): 0 993--1024, 2019

    2019

  4. [12]

    Trading in the sunshine or in the shade: Market impact and adverse selection on H yperliquid

    Davide Barone and Fabrizio Lillo. Trading in the sunshine or in the shade: Market impact and adverse selection on H yperliquid. arXiv:2606.15715, 2026

    2026

  5. [13]

    An empirical analysis of the limit order book and the order flow in the Paris Bourse

    Bruno Biais, Pierre Hillion, and Chester Spatt. An empirical analysis of the limit order book and the order flow in the Paris Bourse . Journal of Finance, 50 0 (5): 0 1655--1689, 1995. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05192.x

    1995

  6. [14]

    Brokers and informed traders: Dealing with toxic flow and extracting trading signals

    \'A lvaro Cartea and Leandro S \'a nchez-Betancourt. Brokers and informed traders: Dealing with toxic flow and extracting trading signals. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 16 0 (2): 0 243--270, 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    Algorithmic and High-Frequency Trading

    \'A lvaro Cartea, Sebastian Jaimungal, and Jos \'e Penalva. Algorithmic and High-Frequency Trading. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015

    2015

  8. [16]

    Enhancing trading strategies with order book signals

    \'A lvaro Cartea, Ryan Donnelly, and Sebastian Jaimungal. Enhancing trading strategies with order book signals. Applied Mathematical Finance, 25 0 (1): 0 1--35, 2018. doi:10.1080/1350486X.2018.1434009

    2018

  9. [17]

    Detecting toxic flow

    \'A lvaro Cartea, Gerardo Duran-Martin, and Leandro S \'a nchez-Betancourt. Detecting toxic flow. Quantitative Finance, 26 0 (4): 0 541--561, 2026. doi:10.1080/14697688.2026.2619539

    2026

  10. [18]

    Do prices reveal the presence of informed trading? Journal of Finance, 70 0 (4): 0 1555--1582, 2015

    Pierre Collin-Dufresne and Vyacheslav Fos. Do prices reveal the presence of informed trading? Journal of Finance, 70 0 (4): 0 1555--1582, 2015. doi:10.1111/jofi.12260

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    The price impact of order book events

    Rama Cont, Arseniy Kukanov, and Sasha Stoikov. The price impact of order book events. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 12 0 (1): 0 47--88, 2014. doi:10.1093/jjfinec/nbt003

    2014 doi

  12. [20]

    Flash boys 2.0: Frontrunning in decentralized exchanges, miner extractable value, and consensus instability

    Philip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li, Xueyuan Zhao, Iddo Bentov, Lorenz Breidenbach, and Ari Juels. Flash boys 2.0: Frontrunning in decentralized exchanges, miner extractable value, and consensus instability. In 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Kiefer, Maureen O'Hara, and Joseph B

    David Easley, Nicholas M. Kiefer, Maureen O'Hara, and Joseph B. Paperman. Liquidity, information, and infrequently traded stocks. Journal of Finance, 51 0 (4): 0 1405--1436, 1996. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb04074.x

    1996

  14. [22]

    L \'o pez de Prado, and Maureen O'Hara

    David Easley, Marcos M. L \'o pez de Prado, and Maureen O'Hara. Flow toxicity and liquidity in a high-frequency world. Review of Financial Studies, 25 0 (5): 0 1457--1493, 2012. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhs053

    2012 doi

  15. [23]

    Putni n s

    Ester F \'e lez-Vi \ n as, Luke Johnson, and T \=a lis J. Putni n s . Insider trading in cryptocurrency markets. SSRN Working Paper 4184367, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Does anonymity matter in electronic limit order markets? Review of Financial Studies, 20 0 (5): 0 1707--1747, 2007

    Thierry Foucault, Sophie Moinas, and Erik Theissen. Does anonymity matter in electronic limit order markets? Review of Financial Studies, 20 0 (5): 0 1707--1747, 2007

    2007

  17. [25]

    Toxic arbitrage

    Thierry Foucault, Roman Kozhan, and Wing Wah Tham. Toxic arbitrage. Review of Financial Studies, 30 0 (4): 0 1053--1094, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    Glosten and Lawrence E

    Lawrence R. Glosten and Lawrence E. Harris. Estimating the components of the bid/ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 21 0 (1): 0 123--142, 1988. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(88)90034-7

    1988 doi

  19. [27]

    Glosten and Paul R

    Lawrence R. Glosten and Paul R. Milgrom. Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 14 0 (1): 0 71--100, 1985. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(85)90044-3

    1985 doi

  20. [28]

    Measuring the information content of stock trades

    Joel Hasbrouck. Measuring the information content of stock trades. Journal of Finance, 46 0 (1): 0 179--207, 1991. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03749.x

    1991

  21. [29]

    Fundamentals of perpetual futures

    Songrun He, Asaf Manela, Omri Ross, and Victor von Wachter. Fundamentals of perpetual futures. Working paper, arXiv:2212.06888, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Do high-frequency traders anticipate buying and selling pressure? Management Science, 67 0 (6): 0 3321--3345, 2021

    Nicholas Hirschey. Do high-frequency traders anticipate buying and selling pressure? Management Science, 67 0 (6): 0 3321--3345, 2021. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3608

    2021

  23. [31]

    Huang and Hans R

    Roger D. Huang and Hans R. Stoll. The components of the bid-ask spread: A general approach. Review of Financial Studies, 10 0 (4): 0 995--1034, 1997. doi:10.1093/rfs/10.4.995

    1997 doi

  24. [32]

    Kyle, Mehrdad Samadi, and Tugkan Tuzun

    Andrei Kirilenko, Albert S. Kyle, Mehrdad Samadi, and Tugkan Tuzun. The flash crash: High-frequency trading in an electronic market. Journal of Finance, 72 0 (3): 0 967--998, 2017

    2017

  25. [33]

    Kolm, Jeremy Turiel, and Nicholas Westray

    Petter N. Kolm, Jeremy Turiel, and Nicholas Westray. Deep order flow imbalance: Extracting alpha at multiple horizons from the limit order book. Mathematical Finance, 33 0 (4): 0 1044--1081, 2023. doi:10.1111/mafi.12413

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    Albert S. Kyle. Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica, 53 0 (6): 0 1315--1335, 1985. doi:10.2307/1913210

    1985 doi

  27. [35]

    Alfred Lehar and Christine A. Parlour. Decentralized exchange: The U niswap automated market maker. Journal of Finance, 80 0 (1): 0 321--374, 2025. doi:10.1111/jofi.13405

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    Linnainmaa and Gideon Saar

    Juhani T. Linnainmaa and Gideon Saar. Lack of anonymity and the inference from order flow. Review of Financial Studies, 25 0 (5): 0 1414--1456, 2012

    2012

  29. [37]

    Trading and arbitrage in cryptocurrency markets

    Igor Makarov and Antoinette Schoar. Trading and arbitrage in cryptocurrency markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 135 0 (2): 0 293--319, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.07.001

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Anonymous trading in equities

    Tom Grimstvedt Meling. Anonymous trading in equities. Journal of Finance, 76 0 (2): 0 707--754, 2021. doi:10.1111/jofi.12988

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    Moallemi, Tim Roughgarden, and Anthony Lee Zhang

    Jason Milionis, Ciamac C. Moallemi, Tim Roughgarden, and Anthony Lee Zhang. Automated market making and loss-versus-rebalancing. Working paper, arXiv:2208.06046, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Reiss and Ingrid M

    Peter C. Reiss and Ingrid M. Werner. Anonymity, adverse selection, and the sorting of interdealer trades. Review of Financial Studies, 18 0 (2): 0 599--636, 2005

    2005

  33. [41]

    Universal features of price formation in financial markets: perspectives from deep learning

    Justin Sirignano and Rama Cont. Universal features of price formation in financial markets: perspectives from deep learning. Quantitative Finance, 19 0 (9): 0 1449--1459, 2019. doi:10.1080/14697688.2019.1622295

    2019

  34. [42]

    The micro-price: a high-frequency estimator of future prices

    Sasha Stoikov. The micro-price: a high-frequency estimator of future prices. Quantitative Finance, 18 0 (12): 0 1959--1966, 2018. doi:10.1080/14697688.2018.1489139

    1959

  35. [43]

    Menkveld

    Vincent van Kervel and Albert J. Menkveld. High-frequency trading around large institutional orders. Journal of Finance, 74 0 (3): 0 1091--1137, 2019. doi:10.1111/jofi.12759

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    Gould, and Sam D

    Ke Xu, Martin D. Gould, and Sam D. Howison. Multi-level order-flow imbalance in a limit order book. Market Microstructure and Liquidity, 4 0 (3--4): 0 1950011, 2019. doi:10.1142/S2382626619500114

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    Shestopaloff, and Stefan Zohren

    Yichi Zhang, Mihai Cucuringu, Alexander Y. Shestopaloff, and Stefan Zohren. ClusterLOB : Enhancing trading strategies by clustering orders in limit order books. Working paper, arXiv:2504.20349, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Shestopaloff , title =

    Jakob Albers and Mihai Cucuringu and Sam Howison and Alexander Y. Shestopaloff , title =. 2026 , note =

    2026

  39. [47]

    2026 , note =

    Davide Barone and Fabrizio Lillo , title =. 2026 , note =

    2026

  40. [48]

    2011 , note =

    Ruihong Huang and Tomas Polak , title =. 2011 , note =

    2011

  41. [49]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume =

    Igor Makarov and Antoinette Schoar , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  42. [50]

    Management Science , year =

    Andrea Barbon and Angelo Ranaldo , title =. Management Science , year =

  43. [51]

    Parlour , title =

    Alfred Lehar and Christine A. Parlour , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  44. [52]

    2021 , note =

    Agostino Capponi and Ruizhe Jia , title =. 2021 , note =

    2021

  45. [53]

    Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics , volume =

    Jun Aoyagi and Yuki Ito , title =. Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  46. [54]

    Journal of Banking & Finance , volume =

    Alexander Brauneis and Roland Mestel and Ryan Riordan and Erik Theissen , title =. Journal of Banking & Finance , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  47. [55]

    Karlsen and Talis J

    Sean Foley and Jonathan R. Karlsen and Talis J. Putni. Sex, drugs, and bitcoin: How much illegal activity is financed through cryptocurrencies? , journal =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  48. [56]

    2024 , note =

    Songrun He and Asaf Manela and Omri Ross and Victor von Wachter , title =. 2024 , note =

    2024

  49. [57]

    Mathematical Finance , year =

    Damien Ackerer and Julien Hugonnier and Urban Jermann , title =. Mathematical Finance , year =

  50. [58]

    Journal of Futures Markets , volume =

    Carol Alexander and Jaehyuk Choi and Heungju Park and Sungbin Sohn , title =. Journal of Futures Markets , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  51. [59]

    Carol Alexander and Jaehyuk Choi and Hamish R. A. Massie and Sungbin Sohn , title =. International Review of Financial Analysis , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  52. [60]

    2025 , note =

    Min Dai and Linfeng Li and Chen Yang , title =. 2025 , note =

    2025

  53. [61]

    Kyle , title =

    Albert S. Kyle , title =. Econometrica , volume =. 1985 , doi =

    1985

  54. [62]

    Glosten and Paul R

    Lawrence R. Glosten and Paul R. Milgrom , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 1985 , doi =

    1985

  55. [63]

    Stoll , title =

    Thomas Ho and Hans R. Stoll , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 1981 , doi =

    1981

  56. [64]

    Quantitative Finance , volume =

    Marco Avellaneda and Sasha Stoikov , title =. Quantitative Finance , volume =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  57. [65]

    Derivatives exchanges , year =

  58. [66]

    2026 , howpublished =

    Foundation non-validating node and. 2026 , howpublished =

    2026

  59. [67]

    2026 , howpublished =

    Perp. 2026 , howpublished =

    2026

  60. [68]

    2026 , howpublished =

    Spot. 2026 , howpublished =

    2026

  61. [69]

    2026 , howpublished =

    Shaun Paul Lee , title =. 2026 , howpublished =

    2026

  62. [70]

    2026 , howpublished =

    2026

  63. [71]

    Perpetual protocol trade volume , year =

  64. [72]

    Journal of Financial Econometrics , volume =

    Rama Cont and Arseniy Kukanov and Sasha Stoikov , title =. Journal of Financial Econometrics , volume =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  65. [73]

    Gould and Sam D

    Ke Xu and Martin D. Gould and Sam D. Howison , title =. Market Microstructure and Liquidity , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  66. [74]

    Quantitative Finance , volume =

    Rama Cont and Mihai Cucuringu and Chao Zhang , title =. Quantitative Finance , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  67. [75]

    Journal of Finance , volume =

    Joel Hasbrouck , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 1991 , doi =

    1991

  68. [76]

    2015 , note =

    Danlei Shen , title =. 2015 , note =

    2015

  69. [77]

    The price impact of order book events: market orders, limit orders and cancellations , journal =

    Zolt. The price impact of order book events: market orders, limit orders and cancellations , journal =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  70. [78]

    Gould and Julius Bonart , title =

    Martin D. Gould and Julius Bonart , title =. Market Microstructure and Liquidity , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  71. [79]

    Sotiropoulos , title =

    Alexander Lipton and Umberto Pesavento and Michael G. Sotiropoulos , title =. 2013 , note =

    2013

  72. [80]

    Journal of Futures Markets , volume =

    Charles Cao and Oliver Hansch and Xiaoxin Wang , title =. Journal of Futures Markets , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  73. [81]

    Order book characteristics and the volume-volatility relation: Empirical evidence from a limit order market , journal =

    Randi N. Order book characteristics and the volume-volatility relation: Empirical evidence from a limit order market , journal =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  74. [82]

    Statistical properties of stock order books: empirical results and models , journal =

    Jean-Philippe Bouchaud and Marc M. Statistical properties of stock order books: empirical results and models , journal =. 2002 , doi =

    2002

  75. [83]

    Kavajecz , title =

    Kenneth A. Kavajecz , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 1999 , doi =

    1999

  76. [84]

    Kercheval and Yuan Zhang , title =

    Alec N. Kercheval and Yuan Zhang , title =. Quantitative Finance , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  77. [85]

    Harris and Venkatesh Panchapagesan , title =

    Lawrence E. Harris and Venkatesh Panchapagesan , title =. Journal of Financial Markets , volume =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

  78. [86]

    2018 , doi =

    Enhancing trading strategies with order book signals , journal =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  79. [87]

    Irvine and George J

    Paul J. Irvine and George J. Benston and Eugene Kandel , title =. 2000 , note =

    2000

  80. [88]

    Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume =

    Harold Demsetz , title =. Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume =. 1968 , doi =

    1968

  81. [89]

    Huang and Hans R

    Roger D. Huang and Hans R. Stoll , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 1996 , doi =

    1996

  82. [90]

    Kaufman , title =

    Hendrik Bessembinder and Herbert M. Kaufman , title =. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  83. [91]

    Journal of Finance , volume =

    Richard Roll , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 1984 , doi =

    1984

  84. [92]

    Quantitative Finance , volume =

    Sasha Stoikov , title =. Quantitative Finance , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  85. [93]

    Holthausen and Richard W

    Robert W. Holthausen and Richard W. Leftwich and David Mayers , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 1987 , doi =

    1987

  86. [94]

    Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume =

    Lawrence Harris , title =. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume =. 1989 , doi =

    1989

  87. [95]

    Charles M. C. Lee and Mark J. Ready , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 1991 , doi =

    1991

  88. [96]

    Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume =

    Katrina Ellis and Roni Michaely and Maureen O'Hara , title =. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume =. 2000 , doi =

    2000

  89. [97]

    Van Ness , title =

    Bidisha Chakrabarty and Bingguang Li and Vanthuan Nguyen and Robert A. Van Ness , title =. Journal of Banking & Finance , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  90. [98]

    David Easley and Marcos M. L. Discerning information from trade data , journal =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  91. [99]

    Journal of Finance , volume =

    Maureen O'Hara and Chen Yao and Mao Ye , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  92. [100]

    Alexander and Mark A

    Gordon J. Alexander and Mark A. Peterson , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  93. [101]

    Barclay and Jerold B

    Michael J. Barclay and Jerold B. Warner , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    1993

  94. [102]

    Kiefer and Maureen O'Hara and Joseph B

    David Easley and Nicholas M. Kiefer and Maureen O'Hara and Joseph B. Paperman , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 1996 , doi =

    1996

  95. [103]

    David Easley and Marcos M. L. Flow toxicity and liquidity in a high-frequency world , journal =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  96. [104]

    Journal of Finance , volume =

    Joel Hasbrouck , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  97. [105]

    Journal of Financial Markets , volume =

    Yakov Amihud , title =. Journal of Financial Markets , volume =. 2002 , doi =

    2002

  98. [106]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume =

    Joel Hasbrouck , title =. Review of Financial Studies , volume =. 1991 , doi =

    1991

  99. [107]

    Glosten and Lawrence E

    Lawrence R. Glosten and Lawrence E. Harris , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 1988 , doi =

    1988

  100. [108]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume =

    Ananth Madhavan and Matthew Richardson and Mark Roomans , title =. Review of Financial Studies , volume =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  101. [109]

    Huang and Hans R

    Roger D. Huang and Hans R. Stoll , title =. Review of Financial Studies , volume =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  102. [110]

    Engle , title =

    Alfonso Dufour and Robert F. Engle , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 2000 , doi =

    2000

  103. [111]

    Doyne Farmer , title =

    Fabrizio Lillo and J. Doyne Farmer , title =. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics , volume =. 2004 , doi =

    2004

  104. [112]

    Quantitative Finance , volume =

    Jean-Philippe Bouchaud and Yuval Gefen and Marc Potters and Matthieu Wyart , title =. Quantitative Finance , volume =. 2004 , doi =

    2004

  105. [113]

    Why is equity order flow so persistent? , journal =

    Bence T. Why is equity order flow so persistent? , journal =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  106. [114]

    Engle and Jeffrey R

    Robert F. Engle and Jeffrey R. Russell , title =. Econometrica , volume =. 1998 , doi =

    1998

  107. [115]

    Journal of Finance , volume =

    Bruno Biais and Pierre Hillion and Chester Spatt , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 1995 , doi =

    1995

  108. [116]

    Hawkes processes in finance , journal =

    Emmanuel Bacry and Iacopo Mastromatteo and Jean-Fran. Hawkes processes in finance , journal =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  109. [117]

    Hardiman and Nicolas Bercot and Jean-Philippe Bouchaud , title =

    Stephen J. Hardiman and Nicolas Bercot and Jean-Philippe Bouchaud , title =. European Physical Journal B , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  110. [118]

    Physical Review E , volume =

    Vladimir Filimonov and Didier Sornette , title =. Physical Review E , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  111. [119]

    Journal of Financial Markets , volume =

    Joel Hasbrouck and Gideon Saar , title =. Journal of Financial Markets , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  112. [120]

    Journal of Financial Markets , volume =

    Joel Hasbrouck and Gideon Saar , title =. Journal of Financial Markets , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  113. [121]

    Jones and Albert J

    Terrence Hendershott and Charles M. Jones and Albert J. Menkveld , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  114. [122]

    Journal of Financial Markets , volume =

    Jeremy Large , title =. Journal of Financial Markets , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  115. [123]

    Review of Finance , volume =

    Hans Degryse and Frank de Jong and Maarten van Ravenswaaij and Gunther Wuyts , title =. Review of Finance , volume =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

  116. [124]

    Andersen and Tim Bollerslev and Francis X

    Torben G. Andersen and Tim Bollerslev and Francis X. Diebold and Paul Labys , title =. Econometrica , volume =. 2003 , doi =

    2003

  117. [125]

    Barndorff-Nielsen and Neil Shephard , title =

    Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen and Neil Shephard , title =. Journal of Financial Econometrics , volume =. 2004 , doi =

    2004

  118. [126]

    Barndorff-Nielsen and Neil Shephard , title =

    Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen and Neil Shephard , title =. Journal of Financial Econometrics , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  119. [127]

    Andersen and Tim Bollerslev and Francis X

    Torben G. Andersen and Tim Bollerslev and Francis X. Diebold , title =. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  120. [128]

    Barndorff-Nielsen and Silja Kinnebrock and Neil Shephard , title =

    Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen and Silja Kinnebrock and Neil Shephard , title =. Volatility and Time Series Econometrics: Essays in Honor of Robert F. Engle , editor =. 2010 , doi =

    2010

  121. [129]

    Patton and Kevin Sheppard , title =

    Andrew J. Patton and Kevin Sheppard , title =. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  122. [130]

    Mykland and Yacine A

    Lan Zhang and Per A. Mykland and Yacine A. A tale of two time scales: Determining integrated volatility with noisy high-frequency data , journal =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

  123. [131]

    Barndorff-Nielsen and Peter Reinhard Hansen and Asger Lunde and Neil Shephard , title =

    Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen and Peter Reinhard Hansen and Asger Lunde and Neil Shephard , title =. Econometrica , volume =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  124. [132]

    Mykland and Mark Podolskij and Mathias Vetter , title =

    Jean Jacod and Yingying Li and Per A. Mykland and Mark Podolskij and Mathias Vetter , title =. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  125. [133]

    Journal of Financial Econometrics , volume =

    Fulvio Corsi , title =. Journal of Financial Econometrics , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  126. [134]

    Patton and Rogier Quaedvlieg , title =

    Tim Bollerslev and Andrew J. Patton and Rogier Quaedvlieg , title =. Journal of Econometrics , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  127. [135]

    Lee and Per A

    Suzanne S. Lee and Per A. Mykland , title =. Review of Financial Studies , volume =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  128. [136]

    Andersen and Dobrislav Dobrev and Ernst Schaumburg , title =

    Torben G. Andersen and Dobrislav Dobrev and Ernst Schaumburg , title =. Journal of Econometrics , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  129. [137]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume =

    Diego Amaya and Peter Christoffersen and Kris Jacobs and Aurelio Vasquez , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  130. [138]

    Journal of Finance , volume =

    Joel Hasbrouck , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 1995 , doi =

    1995

  131. [139]

    Estimation of common long-memory components in cointegrated systems , journal =

    Jes. Estimation of common long-memory components in cointegrated systems , journal =. 1995 , doi =

    1995

  132. [140]

    Bernoulli , volume =

    Takaki Hayashi and Nakahiro Yoshida , title =. Bernoulli , volume =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

  133. [141]

    Bernoulli , volume =

    Marc Hoffmann and Mathieu Rosenbaum and Nakahiro Yoshida , title =. Bernoulli , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  134. [142]

    Seguin , title =

    Hendrik Bessembinder and Paul J. Seguin , title =. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    1993

  135. [143]

    Applied Economics , volume =

    Zhiyong Cheng and Jun Deng and Tianyi Wang and Mei Yu , title =. Applied Economics , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  136. [144]

    Shestopaloff and Stefan Zohren , title =

    Yichi Zhang and Mihai Cucuringu and Alexander Y. Shestopaloff and Stefan Zohren , title =. 2025 , note =

    2025

  137. [145]

    Shestopaloff , title =

    Jakob Albers and Mihai Cucuringu and Sam Howison and Alexander Y. Shestopaloff , title =. 2025 , note =

    2025

  138. [146]

    Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume =

    Matteo Aquilina and Eric Budish and Peter O'Neill , title =. Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  139. [147]

    2026 , doi =

    Detecting toxic flow , journal =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  140. [148]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume =

    Jonathan Brogaard and Terrence Hendershott and Ryan Riordan , title =. Review of Financial Studies , volume =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  141. [149]

    Menkveld , title =

    Vincent van Kervel and Albert J. Menkveld , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  142. [150]

    Menkveld , title =

    Terrence Hendershott and Albert J. Menkveld , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  143. [151]

    The lasting impact of flickering quotes , year =

    Jonathan Brogaard and. The lasting impact of flickering quotes , year =

  144. [152]

    Journal of Forecasting , volume =

    Adamantios Ntakaris and Martin Magris and Juho Kanniainen and Moncef Gabbouj and Alexandros Iosifidis , title =. Journal of Forecasting , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  145. [153]

    IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , volume =

    Zihao Zhang and Stefan Zohren and Stephen Roberts , title =. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  146. [154]

    2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) , pages =

    Avraam Tsantekidis and Nikolaos Passalis and Anastasios Tefas and Juho Kanniainen and Moncef Gabbouj and Alexandros Iosifidis , title =. 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) , pages =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  147. [155]

    Quantitative Finance , volume =

    Justin Sirignano and Rama Cont , title =. Quantitative Finance , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  148. [156]

    Sirignano , title =

    Justin A. Sirignano , title =. Quantitative Finance , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  149. [157]

    Kolm and Jeremy Turiel and Nicholas Westray , title =

    Petter N. Kolm and Jeremy Turiel and Nicholas Westray , title =. Mathematical Finance , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  150. [158]

    Applied Soft Computing , volume =

    Avraam Tsantekidis and Nikolaos Passalis and Anastasios Tefas and Juho Kanniainen and Moncef Gabbouj and Alexandros Iosifidis , title =. Applied Soft Computing , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  151. [159]

    Pakkanen and Almut E

    Lorenzo Lucchese and Mikko S. Pakkanen and Almut E. D. Veraart , title =. International Journal of Forecasting , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  152. [160]

    Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An Experimental Evaluation , author=

  153. [161]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates , author=. American Economic Review , volume=

  154. [162]

    Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies , author=. Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

  155. [163]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume=

    Performance of Institutional Trading Desks: An Analysis of Persistence in Trading Costs , author=. Review of Financial Studies , volume=

  156. [164]

    Journal of Finance , volume=

    The Flash Crash: High-Frequency Trading in an Electronic Market , author=. Journal of Finance , volume=

  157. [165]

    Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=

    Risk and Return in High-Frequency Trading , author=. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , volume=

  158. [166]

    Menkveld , title =

    Albert J. Menkveld , title =. Journal of Financial Markets , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  159. [167]

    arXiv:1906.12010 , year =

    Tucker Hybinette Balch and Mahmoud Mahfouz and Joshua Lockhart and Maria Hybinette and David Byrd , title =. arXiv:1906.12010 , year =

    1906 arXiv

  160. [168]

    Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSIM Conference on Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation (SIGSIM-PADS) , pages =

    David Byrd and Maria Hybinette and Tucker Hybinette Balch , title =. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSIM Conference on Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation (SIGSIM-PADS) , pages =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  161. [169]

    Moallemi and Kai Yuan , title =

    Ciamac C. Moallemi and Kai Yuan , title =. Columbia Business School Research Paper , year =

  162. [170]

    Dealing with the inventory risk: a solution to the market making problem , journal =

    Olivier Gu. Dealing with the inventory risk: a solution to the market making problem , journal =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  163. [171]

    Bailey and Marcos L

    David H. Bailey and Marcos L. The Deflated Sharpe Ratio: Correcting for Selection Bias, Backtest Overfitting, and Non-Normality , journal =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  164. [172]

    Financial Analysts Journal , volume =

    Walter Bagehot , title =. Financial Analysts Journal , volume =. 1971 , doi =

    1971

  165. [173]

    Copeland and Dan Galai , title =

    Thomas E. Copeland and Dan Galai , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =

  166. [174]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume =

    David Easley and Maureen O'Hara , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =

  167. [175]

    Glosten , title =

    Lawrence R. Glosten , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =

  168. [176]

    Journal of Finance , volume =

    Pierre Collin-Dufresne and Vyacheslav Fos , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  169. [177]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume =

    Thierry Foucault and Roman Kozhan and Wing Wah Tham , title =. Review of Financial Studies , volume =

  170. [178]

    Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume =

    Eric Budish and Peter Cramton and John Shim , title =. Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  171. [179]

    Quantitative Finance , volume =

    Roel Oomen , title =. Quantitative Finance , volume =

  172. [180]

    Quantitative Finance , volume =

    Maximilian Butz and Roel Oomen , title =. Quantitative Finance , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  173. [181]

    Brokers and informed traders: Dealing with toxic flow and extracting trading signals , journal =

  174. [182]

    Algorithmic and High-Frequency Trading , publisher =

  175. [183]

    Forster and Thomas J

    Margaret M. Forster and Thomas J. George , title =. Journal of Financial Intermediation , volume =

  176. [184]

    Admati and Paul Pfleiderer , title =

    Anat R. Admati and Paul Pfleiderer , title =. Review of Financial Studies , volume =. 1991 , doi =

    1991

  177. [185]

    Review of Finance , volume =

    Barbara Rindi , title =. Review of Finance , volume =

  178. [186]

    Review of Financial Studies , volume =

    Thierry Foucault and Sophie Moinas and Erik Theissen , title =. Review of Financial Studies , volume =

  179. [187]

    Reiss and Ingrid M

    Peter C. Reiss and Ingrid M. Werner , title =. Review of Financial Studies , volume =

  180. [188]

    Journal of Financial Markets , volume =

    Carole Comerton-Forde and Kar Mei Tang , title =. Journal of Financial Markets , volume =

  181. [189]

    Journal of Finance , volume =

    Tom Grimstvedt Meling , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  182. [190]

    Linnainmaa and Gideon Saar , title =

    Juhani T. Linnainmaa and Gideon Saar , title =. Review of Financial Studies , volume =

  183. [191]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume =

    Mark Grinblatt and Matti Keloharju , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =. 2000 , doi =

    2000

  184. [192]

    Barber and Yi-Tsung Lee and Yu-Jane Liu and Terrance Odean , title =

    Brad M. Barber and Yi-Tsung Lee and Yu-Jane Liu and Terrance Odean , title =. Journal of Financial Markets , volume =

  185. [193]

    Management Science , volume =

    Nicholas Hirschey , title =. Management Science , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  186. [194]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume =

    Marco Di Maggio and Francesco Franzoni and Amir Kermani and Carlo Sommavilla , title =. Journal of Financial Economics , volume =

  187. [195]

    Journal of Finance , volume =

    Andrea Barbon and Marco Di Maggio and Francesco Franzoni and Augustin Landier , title =. Journal of Finance , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  188. [196]

    2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy , year =

    Philip Daian and Steven Goldfeder and Tyler Kell and Yunqi Li and Xueyuan Zhao and Iddo Bentov and Lorenz Breidenbach and Ari Juels , title =. 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy , year =

    2020

  189. [197]

    2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy , year =

    Kaihua Qin and Liyi Zhou and Arthur Gervais , title =. 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy , year =

    2022

  190. [198]

    Moallemi and Tim Roughgarden and Anthony Lee Zhang , title =

    Jason Milionis and Ciamac C. Moallemi and Tim Roughgarden and Anthony Lee Zhang , title =. 2022 , note =

    2022

  191. [199]

    Management Science , volume =

    Andreas Park , title =. Management Science , volume =

  192. [200]

    2023 , note =

    Agostino Capponi and Ruizhe Jia and Brian Zhu , title =. 2023 , note =

    2023

  193. [201]

    Insider trading in cryptocurrency markets , year =

    Ester F. Insider trading in cryptocurrency markets , year =

  194. [202]

    2021 , doi =

    Igor Makarov and Antoinette Schoar , title =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.