Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 41 references

Laser-Plasma Accelerator Beams in Light Sources: Femtosecond High-Brightness Radiation through Chirped Pulse Injection

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Chirped-pulse injection can deliver kiloampere, femtosecond bunches to any storage-ring beamline using only the LPA injector's existing rf compressor.

desk verdict A genuinely useful storage-ring LPA injection scheme with solid tracking, but the coherent near-UV radiation claim is quantitatively wrong and the 'any beamline' headline overreaches. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04699 v1 pith:YHYNXAA5 submitted 2026-08-05 physics.acc-ph

Sergey A. Antipov , Philipp Burghart , Ilya Agapov , Alberto Martinez de la Ossa , Wim Leemans This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.acc-ph
keywords laser-plasmaaccelerationchirpedpulseinjectionstorageringlightsourcefemtosecondbunchesenergycompressioncoherentsynchrotronradiationfree-electronlaserPETRAIV
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a way to give hard-x-ray storage-ring light sources femtosecond, kiloampere electron bunches at user beamlines by reusing the laser-plasma injector that fills the ring. Instead of cancelling the injector's energy chirp as in normal top-up operation, the rf compressor is set to leave a deliberate position-energy correlation, matched so the ring's own arcs compress the bunch longitudinally by the time it reaches a chosen undulator. For PETRA IV, tracking predicts a 2.2 kA peak-current, 2.3-micron-rms core at the U61 beamline, with coherent radiation from THz to near-UV and a possible path to EUV lasing. The point is that existing synchrotron infrastructure could gain a femtosecond high-brightness mode at many beamlines without new ring hardware.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the matched-chirp condition h = -1/R56, where R56 = partial s / partial delta is the momentum compaction of the combined injection line and ring arc from injector to beamline. The injector's rf cavity is adjusted so that the bunch arrives at the septum with a chirp satisfying this relation, and the ring arcs then act as a compressor; the required rf voltage follows from h = 1/$R_ch^{56}$ + k_rf U e / E0. This turns the ring's own optics into the compression stage, so no modification of the storage ring itself is needed, and nearby beamlines can be served simultaneously because their R56 values differ only slightly.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to send a chirped bunch through one turn of a ring with known R56 and measure the longitudinal bunch profile at the target beamline with an electro-optic or coherent-radiation monitor; failure to observe compression to the predicted femtosecond-core, kA-level current would disprove the scheme.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the same rf cavity used for active energy compression of a laser-plasma injector can be detuned to imprint a controlled energy chirp h = -1/R56 on the bunch, so that the non-zero momentum compaction of the storage-ring arc compresses the already-short LPA bunch to femtosecond length exactly at the target beamline. In the PETRA IV example, an 87 pC bunch from a 6 GeV LPA, after injection and transport through the ring, reaches the U61 undulator with a 33 pC core, 2.3 micrometre rms length, and 2.2 kA peak current; the projected energy spread stays near 1%, within the ring's momentum acceptance. Such bunches produce coherent radiation from THz to about 10 eV from a bending magnet, and the paper estimates that with a longer undulator and improved beam quality, a single-pass EUV FEL at 13.6 nm might become feasible, though a 10 m undulator with the present beam showed no significant gain.

Load-bearing premise

The scheme stands on the unproven assumption that the 6 GeV laser-plasma injector can repeatedly deliver an 87 pC bunch with roughly 1% energy spread and sub-percent energy stability at 30 Hz, and that its rf compressor can supply the roughly 200 MV chirping voltage that nearby beamlines require.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Existing storage-ring light sources could offer femtosecond kiloampere pulses at multiple beamlines simply by retuning the LPA injector's rf compressor, with no changes to the ring lattice.
  • The compressed bunches generate coherent radiation spanning THz to near-UV at a bending magnet, with pulse duration set by the roughly 8 fs rms bunch length.
  • The injected bunch can be dumped after one turn with the ring's fast kickers, so top-up operation and timing-mode measurements with stored bunches continue unaffected.
  • With improved beam quality (roughly halved emittance) and a roughly 25 m undulator, simulations show exponential gain in pulse energy, suggesting a future single-pass EUV FEL in the ring at tens of hertz.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The scheme's reach is set by rf voltage: beamlines close to the injection point need chirping voltages approaching 200 MV, so a ring with smaller arc R56 or a lower-voltage compressor would only serve the most distant beamlines.
  • The roughly 2 kA ceiling seen in CSR-included simulations for far beamlines implies an upper bound on single-pass compressed current in high-energy rings; pushing beyond may require CSR shielding or fewer bends between injection and target.
  • Because the LPA bunch and a stored timing bunch can be separated by 1-100 ns in the same turn, the scheme naturally enables pump-probe experiments where a femtosecond pulse initiates a state and a hard-x-ray pulse reads it out on nanosecond timescales.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a chirped-pulse injection scheme for a laser-plasma accelerator (LPA) injector into a hard x-ray storage ring such as PETRA IV. By adjusting the rf chirping voltage in the injector's existing energy compressor, the beam is given a matched energy-position chirp so that the ring's R56 compresses the bunch longitudinally at a chosen beamline. Using Ocelot tracking with CSR, apertures, and energy-jitter tolerances, the authors report a 2.2 kA peak current with a 2.3 μm rms core at the U61 beamline, and they study peak-current coverage around the ring, the influence of CSR, and the prospects for single-pass FEL operation. The central compression mechanism is supported by the tracking results, but several claims in the abstract and in the coherent-radiation discussion exceed what the simulations and the stated assumptions justify.

Significance. If the mechanism holds, the scheme offers a novel way to deliver femtosecond, kA-scale pulses to multiple beamlines in a fourth-generation storage ring without modifying the ring hardware, using only the LPA injector's rf compressor. The derivation in Eqs. (1)-(3) is clean and the tracking includes the main single-pass degradation effects (CSR, apertures, energy jitter). The authors also provide an explicit CSR wake estimate and a tolerance scan against LPA energy jitter. However, the significance is tempered by three load-bearing issues: the coherent near-UV radiation claim is quantitatively inconsistent with the computed bunch length, the 'any beamline' claim is contradicted by the aperture-limited near beamlines in Fig. 2, and the required rf voltages (up to ~200 MV) and the assumed LPA source performance are not yet demonstrated.

major comments (4)
  1. [p. 3-4, paragraph after Fig. 3 and Fig. 4] The statement that the coherent spectrum 'extends from the THz range into the near-UV, reaching a few 10^15 Hz, or about 10 eV' is quantitatively inconsistent with the bunch parameters in Table I. With an rms core length σ_s = 2.3 μm, the coherent form factor for a Gaussian bunch is |F(ν)|² = exp[-(2πσ_sν/c)²]; at ν = 2.4×10^15 Hz, kσ_s ≈ 116 and |F(ν)|² ≈ exp(-1.3×10^4) ≈ 0. Coherent emission is therefore confined to wavelengths comparable to or longer than ~2.3 μm (THz/far-IR), not near-UV. The same bunch length that produces the kA peak current sets the coherent cutoff, so this is not a minor overplotting issue but an incorrect physical claim that appears in the abstract and conclusion. Please revise the coherent-radiation statements and Fig. 4 accordingly.
  2. [Abstract; Fig. 2(b-d)] The abstract claims the scheme enables delivering kA-scale short pulses 'to any synchrotron beamline in the ring.' The tracking results in Fig. 2(b,c) show that the first beamlines downstream of the injection point require large chirp values and suffer transmission losses limited by the ring momentum acceptance and the injection septum aperture, and that kA-scale peak currents are only reached beyond a certain distance. Fig. 2(d) demonstrates simultaneous >1 kA only at 'several' beamlines, not all. The abstract and conclusion should be qualified (e.g., 'a wide range of beamlines') or the paper should explicitly state which beamlines are excluded and why.
  3. [Eq. (2) and Fig. 2 caption] The scheme requires rf chirping voltages up to about 200 MV (e.g., 199.5 MV for the U06 setting in the caption of Fig. 2). The paper does not assess the technical feasibility of such a voltage in the PETRA IV injector or in any realistic X-band rf structure, nor its power and breakdown implications. Since this voltage determines whether nearby beamlines can be served, the 'any beamline' claim and the near-beamline results in Fig. 2 depend on an unexamined assumption. Please provide a feasibility estimate (cavity type, gradient, length, power) or restrict the claims to beamlines reachable with realistically available voltages.
  4. [App. C, Fig. 5; Table I] The robustness study in App. C varies only the initial LPA central energy. The scheme's kA peak current also depends on the assumed 87 pC charge, 3.14 μm rms length, 1% energy spread, and emittances in Table I, all of which are typical LPA parameters but not yet demonstrated at 6 GeV with sub-percent stability. The paper itself notes in App. C that the 6 GeV plasma injector performance 'is still to be quantified.' A scan over charge, energy spread, and emittance (or at least a discussion of which parameters are most critical) would considerably strengthen the central claim; without it, the kA peak-current numbers rest on an unquantified source model.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References [28] and [35]] References [28] and [35] appear as incomplete footnotes with empty author fields and no publication data. They should be converted to full bibliographic entries or properly integrated into the text.
  2. [Conclusion, first paragraph] There is a missing space after the comma in 'In conclusion,chirped-pulse injection'.
  3. [Appendix B] The sentence describing the kernel width for the Gaussian kernel density estimation is ambiguous: 'with the Gaussian kernel having a width of sqrt(Nparticles)' should specify whether this is the kernel standard deviation and in what units (likely number of macroparticles per bin).
  4. [Fig. 4] The vertical axis label and the spectrum calculation should be clarified; in addition to the physical inconsistency raised in Major Comment 1, the figure does not state whether the form factor is plotted for the full distribution or just the 2.3 μm core.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the matched chirp is an explicit design calculation and the kA peak current is a tracking output.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Equation (1) sets h = -1/R56 as an explicit matched-chirp design condition obtained from the ring transfer map, and the tracking then outputs the achieved bunch length and peak current. The 2.2 kA / 2.3 um result in Table I is not a fitted target but a computed consequence of the assumed 87 pC LPA distribution. The assumed injector performance is taken from Refs. [26,27] plus PIC optimization, not derived from or fitted to the beamline result, so the self-citations are an input baseline rather than a load-bearing circular step. The CSR, aperture, and jitter studies compare tracking with and without effects and scan the rf voltage, giving the kA claim independent content beyond the simple compression identity. I flag two non-circular weaknesses: the near-UV coherent-radiation claim is inconsistent with the 2.3 um rms core (the Gaussian coherent form factor at 10 eV is about e^{-1.3e4}, i.e. negligible), and the citation for the R_tl^56 injection-line term is missing (the bracketed reference is an empty parenthetical); these affect physical correctness and reproducibility, not circularity. No step reduces to its own input by construction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The scheme's compression is a designed application of standard R56 transport; the only tuneable free parameter is the rf voltage that sets the chirp. The feasibility rests on assumed LPA injector performance and on standard CSR and tracking models. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • RF chirping voltage U = scanned per beamline, e.g. 199.5 MV for U06
    Peak current at each beamline is maximized by scanning U around the matched value; the quoted kA currents are conditional on this tuned setting.
  • LPA input beam parameters (charge, length, energy spread, emittances) = 87 pC, 3.14 um, 0.46% rms spread, 4.15/1.66 um normalized emittance
    Taken from a Bayesian-optimized FBPIC simulation of the plasma stage. They are external inputs, not fitted to the ring result, but the achievable peak currents depend directly on them.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LPA injector delivers the assumed beam and stability
    The scheme needs 87 pC, 3.14 um, 1% spread, sub-percent energy jitter at 30 Hz; this is planned in Refs. [26,27] but not experimentally demonstrated.
  • domain assumption First- and second-order single-particle transport is sufficient
    Eq. (1) uses linear R56 and the tracking uses second-order maps; higher-order and collective effects beyond CSR are neglected (Sec. II, App. D).
  • domain assumption CSR wake model captures the dominant collective effect
    The paper uses the 1D CSR wake [41] and states other wakefields are negligible without a quantitative estimate (App. D).
  • domain assumption PETRA IV lattice and aperture model represents the real machine
    The Ocelot model (Fig. 1) is taken from the design report [26]; errors in R56 or apertures would change compression and transmission.
  • domain assumption Ming-Xie gain length model applies
    The FEL estimate for the EUV undulator uses the empirical Ming-Xie formula (Ref. [34]); this is not derived in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Laser-Plasma Accelerator Beams in Light Sources: Femtosecond High-Brightness Radiation through Chirped Pulse Injection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YHYNXAA5

@misc{pith2026260804699,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Laser-Plasma Accelerator Beams in Light Sources: Femtosecond High-Brightness Radiation through Chirped Pulse Injection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YHYNXAA5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04699}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a chirped-pulse injection scheme into a hard x-ray low-emittance synchrotron light source such as PETRA IV from a laser-plasma electron injector with active energy compression. The scheme enables delivering kA-scale short pulses with several tens of hertz repetition rate to any synchrotron beamline in the ring and allows producing femtosecond temporally coherent radiation pulses at target beamlines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04699 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic layout (a), optics functions (b) and start-to-end tracking simulations (c-e) of chirped LPA beam injection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schematic of the PETRA IV light source showing the locations of its beamlines and the LPA injector (a). Peak current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. An example phase space of the ideally compressed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. An example of expected radiation form factor and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Tolerance of the maximum current observed at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Coherent synchrotron radiation reduces the maxi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Einfeld, M

    D. Einfeld, M. Plesko, and J. Schaper, First multi-bend achromat lattice consideration, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation21, 856 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Raimondi, C

    P. Raimondi, C. Benabderrahmane, P. Berkvens, J. C. Biasci, P. Borowiec, J.-F. Bouteille, T. Brochard, N. B. Brookes, N. Carmignani, L. R. Carver,et al., The ex- tremely brilliant source storage ring of the european syn- chrotron radiation facility, Communications Physics6, 82 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Raimondi, N

    P. Raimondi, N. Carmignani, L. R. Carver, J. Chavanne, L. Farvacque, G. Le Bec, D. Martin, S. M. Liuzzo, T. Per- ron, and S. White, Commissioning of the hybrid multi- bend achromat lattice at the european synchrotron radi- ation facility, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams 24, 110701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    S. C. Leemann, ˚A. Andersson, M. Eriksson, L.-J. Lind- gren, E. Wall´ en, J. Bengtsson, and A. Streun, Beam dynamics and expected performance of sweden’s new storage-ring light source: MAX IV, Physical Review Spe- cial Topics - Accelerators and Beams12, 120701 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Tanaka, S

    H. Tanaka, S. Goto, T. Ishikawa, S. Takano, T. Watan- abe, and M. Yabashi, SPring-8 upgrade project, inPro- ceedings of the 7th International Particle Accelerator Conference, International Particle Accelerator Confer- ence No. 7 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016) pp. 2867–2870

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Streun, M

    A. Streun, M. Aiba, M. B¨ oge, C. Calzolaio, M. Ehrlich- man, M. Negrazus, B. Riemann, and V. Vrankovic, Swiss light source upgrade lattice design, Physical Review Ac- celerators and Beams26, 091601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    M. Borlandet al., The upgrade of the advanced pho- ton source, inProceedings of the 9th International Par- ticle Accelerator Conference, International Particle Ac- celerator Conference No. 9 (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018) pp. 2872–2877

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Zholents, Electron-beam-based sources of ultrashort x-ray pulses, Reviews of Accelera- tor Science and Technology03, 237 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793626810000415

    A. Zholents, Electron-beam-based sources of ultrashort x-ray pulses, Reviews of Accelera- tor Science and Technology03, 237 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793626810000415

    work page doi:10.1142/s1793626810000415 2010

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    J. N. Galayda, The LCLS-II: A high power upgrade to the LCLS, inProceedings of the 9th International Par- ticle Accelerator Conference, International Particle Ac- celerator Conference No. 9 (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018) pp. 18–23

    2018

  2. [10]

    Decking, S

    W. Decking, S. Abeghyan, P. Abramian, A. Abramsky, A. Aguirre, C. Albrecht, P. Alou, M. Altarelli, P. Alt- mann, K. Amyan,et al., A MHz-repetition-rate hard X- ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting linear accelerator, Nature Photonics14, 391 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Plath, P

    T. Plath, P. Amstutz, J. B¨ odewadt, G. Brenner, N. Ekanayake, B. Faatz, K. Hacker, K. Honkavaara, L. L. Lazzarino, C. Lechner, T. Maltezopoulos, M. Scholz, S. Schreiber, M. Vogt, J. Zemella, and T. Laarmann, Free-electron laser multiplex driven by a superconduct- ing linear a...

    2016

  4. [12]

    Evain, C

    C. Evain, C. Szwaj, E. Roussel, J. Rodriguez, M. Le Par- quier, M.-A. Tordeux, F. Ribeiro, M. Labat, N. Hubert, J.-B. Brubach, P. Roy, and S. Bielawski, Stable coherent terahertz synchrotron radiation from controlled relativis- tic electron bunches, Nature Physics15, 635 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Brosi, J

    M. Brosi, J. L. Steinmann, E. Blomley, T. Boltz, 6 E. Br¨ undermann, J. Gethmann, B. Kehrer, Y.-L. Mathis, A. Papash, M. Schedler,et al., Systematic studies of the microbunching instability at very low bunch charges, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams22, 020701 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Schreiber, T

    P. Schreiber, T. Boltz, M. Brosi, B. Haerer, A. Mochi- hashi, A. I. Papash, M. Schuh, and A.-S. M¨ uller, Influ- ence of negative momentum compaction factors on longi- tudinal beam dynamics in an electron synchrotron, Phys- ical Review Accelerators and Beams29, 044402 (2026)

    2026

  7. [15]

    M. E. Couprie, M. Billardon, M. Velghe, C. Bazin, J. M. Ort´ ega, R. Prazeres, and Y. Petroff, Free-electron-laser oscillation on the Super-ACO storage ring at Orsay, Nu- clear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Sec- tion A296, 13 (1990)

    1990

  8. [16]

    H. Hama, J. Yamazaki, and G. Isoyama, FEL experiment on the UVSOR storage ring, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A341, 12 (1994)

    1994

  9. [17]

    V. N. Litvinenko, B. Burnham, S. H. Park, I. V. Pinayev, Y. Wu, and J. M. J. Madey, First UV/visible lasing with the OK-4/Duke storage ring FEL, Nuclear Instru- ments and Methods in Physics Research Section A407, 8 (1998)

    1998

  10. [18]

    R. P. Walker, J. A. Clarke, M. E. Couprie, G. Dattoli, M. Eriksson, D. Garzella, L. Giannessi, M. Marsi, L. Na- hon, D. N¨ olle,et al., First lasing and initial performance of the european UV/VUV storage ring FEL at ELET- TRA, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Re- sea...

    2001

  11. [19]

    N. Sei, H. Ogawa, and K. Yamada, Lasing of middle- infrared free-electron lasers using the storage ring NIJI- IV, Optics Letters36, 3645 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    Kruschinski, X

    A. Kruschinski, X. Deng, J. Feikes, A. Hoehl, R. Klein, J. Li, M. Ries, and A. Chao, Confirming the theoretical foundation of steady-state microbunching, Communica- tions Physics7, 160 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    X. J. Deng, A. W. Chao, W. H. Huang, and C. X. Tang, Courant-snyder formalism of longitudinal dynam- ics, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams24, 094001 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    X. J. Deng, A. W. Chao, J. Feikes, A. Hoehl, W. H. Huang, R. Klein, A. Kruschinski, J. Li, M. Ries, and C. X. Tang, Breakdown of classical bunch length and en- ergy spread formula in a quasi-isochronous electron stor- age ring, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams26, 054001 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    X.-J. Deng, A. W. Chao, W.-H. Huang, Z.-Z. Li, Z.-L. Pan, and C.-X. Tang, Steady-state microbunching based on transverse-longitudinal coupling, Nuclear Science and Techniques37, 2 (2026)

    2026

  16. [24]

    W. Wang, K. Feng, L. Ke, C. Yu, Y. Xu, R. Qi, Y. Chen, Z. Qin, Z. Zhang, M. Fang,et al., Free-electron lasing at 27 nanometres based on a laser wakefield accelerator, Nature595, 516 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Labat, J

    M. Labat, J. C. Cabada˘ g, A. Ghaith, A. Irman, A. Berlioux, P. Berteaud, F. Blache, S. Bock, F. Bou- vet, F. Briquez,et al., Seeded free-electron laser driven by a compact laser plasma accelerator, Nature Photonics 17, 150 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Agapovet al.,The Plasma Injector for PETRA IV: Enabling Plasma Accelerators for Next-generation Light Sources

    I. Agapovet al.,The Plasma Injector for PETRA IV: Enabling Plasma Accelerators for Next-generation Light Sources. Conceptual Design Report(DESY, Hamburg, 2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    S. A. Antipovet al., Design of a prototype laser-plasma injector for an electron synchrotron, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams24, 111301 (2021), arXiv:2106.07367 [physics.acc- ph]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    (), as modern storage rings are designed to be to a large degree achromaticR 56 of their cells is small and the later addition becomes significant

  21. [29]

    R. Lehe, M. Kirchen, I. Andriyash, B. Godfrey, and J.- L. Vay, A spectral, quasi-cylindrical and dispersion-free particle-in-cell algorithm, Computer Physics Communi- cations203(2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Ferran Pousa, S

    A. Ferran Pousa, S. Jalas, M. Kirchen, A. Martinez de la Ossa, M. Th´ evenet, S. Hudson, J. Larson, A. Huebl, J.-L. Vay, and R. Lehe, Bayesian optimization of laser-plasma accelerators assisted by reduced physical models, Physi- cal Review Accelerators and Beams26, 084601 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Ferran Pousaet al., Optimization at scale powered by libensemble,https://github.com/optimas-org/ optimas

    A. Ferran Pousaet al., Optimization at scale powered by libensemble,https://github.com/optimas-org/ optimas

  24. [32]

    Agapov, G

    I. Agapov, G. Geloni, S. Tomin, and I. Zagorodnov, Ocelot: A software framework for synchrotron light source and fel studies, Nuclear Instruments and Meth- ods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spec- trometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment768, 151 (2014)

    2014

  25. [33]

    Tomin, I

    S. Tomin, I. Agapov, M. Dohlus, and I. Zagorodnov, Ocelot as a framework for beam dynamics simulations of x-ray sources, inProceedings of IPAC2017, 8th Inter- national Particle Accelerator Conference(JACoW Pub- lishing, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2017) pp. 2642–2645

    2017

  26. [34]

    D. C. Nguyen and Q. R. Marksteiner, One-dimensional FEL theory, Lecture slides, Physics of Free-Electron Lasers, U.S. Particle Accelerator School (2014), USPAS, University of New Mexico, June 23–27, 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    A∼ 20-m-long undulator can be installed with an appropriate adjustment of the focusing optics

    (), although standard PETRA IV flagship IDs are 10 m long, they can host longer insertion devices thanks to ample room available in the ring’s straight sections. A∼ 20-m-long undulator can be installed with an appropriate adjustment of the focusing optics

  28. [36]

    Bentson, P

    L. Bentson, P. Bolton, E. Bong, P. Emma, J. Galayda, J. Hastings, P. Krejcik, C. Rago, J. Rifkin, and C. Spencer, FEL research and development at the SLAC sub-picosecond photon source, SPPS, Nuclear Instru- ments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectro...

    2003

  29. [37]

    Yabashi, H

    M. Yabashi, H. Tanaka, and T. Ishikawa, Overview of the SACLA facility, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 22, 477 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Tanaka, K

    H. Tanaka, K. Soutome, and T. Hara, A novel design of a magnetic chicane with positive R56, inProc. IPAC’25, 16th International Particle Accelerator Conference (JA- CoW Publishing, 2025) pp. 130–133

    2025

  31. [39]

    Ferran Pousa, I

    A. Ferran Pousa, I. Agapov, S. A. Antipov, R. W. Ass- mann, R. Brinkmann, S. Jalas, M. Kirchen, W. P. Lee- mans, A. R. Maier, A. Martinez de la Ossa, J. Oster- hoff, and M. Th´ evenet, Energy compression and stabiliza- tion of laser-plasma accelerators, Physical Review Letters...

    2022

  32. [40]

    Borland,ELEGANT: A flexible SDDS-compliant code for accelerator simulation, Tech

    M. Borland,ELEGANT: A flexible SDDS-compliant code for accelerator simulation, Tech. Rep. (Argonne National Lab., IL (US), 2000)

    2000

  33. [41]

    Mayes and G

    C. Mayes and G. Hoffstaetter, Exact 1-D Model for Co- 7 herent Synchrotron Radiation with Shielding and Bunch Compression, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams12, 024401 (2009). Appendix A: Alternative schemes to produce chirped-pulse injection A similar gymnastics in the longitudinal p...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.