Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 202 references

A Pairwise Differencing Distribution Regression Approach for Network Models

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper develops a distribution regression estimator for dyadic networks that differences out two-way fixed effects by conditioning on quadruples of nodes, remaining valid under sparsity and enabling simultaneous inference across…

desk verdict Fix the conditioning event in Eq. (4) and pin down Assumption 4.1, and this is a solid joint-inference extension of the Charbonneau-Jochmans CMLE; as written it is not ready. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04983 v1 pith:HY6QVUGJ submitted 2026-08-05 econ.EM

Gabriela Miyazato Szini This is my paper · ORCID
classification econ.EM MSC 62P2062F12
keywords distributionregressiondyadicnetworkstwo-wayfixedeffectsconditionalmaximumlikelihoodsparsitysimultaneousconfidencebandsgravitymodelincidentalparameterproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that distribution regression—estimating how covariates shift the conditional distribution of an outcome—can be done in dyadic network data with two-way fixed effects, even when the network is sparse. The strategy is to binarize the outcome at each threshold and estimate a sequence of binary choice models; conditioning on certain quadruple configurations removes the sender and receiver fixed effects from the likelihood, sidestepping the incidental parameter problem. The paper claims the estimator stays asymptotically unbiased under sparsity coming either from few links or from thresholds in the extreme tails, and it derives a joint Gaussian approximation for coefficient estimates across thresholds with different convergence rates. On that basis it constructs simultaneous confidence bands and tests of coefficient equality across thresholds, and it reports an application where trade-barrier effects vary substantially across the distribution of bilateral trade.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the informative quadruple: an ordered set of two senders and two receivers in which each node's binarized outcome varies across its two links, coded by $z_\sigma = ((\tilde{y}_{ij}-\tilde{y}_{ik})-(\tilde{y}_{lj}-\tilde{y}_{lk}))/2 \in \{-1,1\}$, with pairwise-differenced covariates $r_\sigma = (x_{ij}-x_{ik})-(x_{lj}-x_{lk})$. Conditional on $z_\sigma \in \{-1,1\}$, the logistic structure gives $\Pr(z_\sigma=1) = \Lambda(r_\sigma' \theta_{y,0})$, so the fixed effects are differenced out and estimation reduces to a standard logit on these transformed quadruples. For joint inference, the machinery is the blockwise score-rate matrix $D_{n,y} = \mathrm{diag}((n^6 p_{n,y_k})^{1/2} I_p)$, which normalizes each threshold's score covariance by its own informativeness rate so that no restriction is placed on how convergence rates compare across thresholds.

What would settle it

A direct check is to simulate the model with two thresholds separated by a shrinking gap, for example empirical quantiles $\tau$ and $\tau+\delta_n$ with $\delta_n \to 0$, and compute the smallest eigenvalue of the block-normalized score covariance; if it collapses to zero while pointwise rate conditions still hold, the joint nondegeneracy assumption is violated. A second check is to run the estimator at the 99th percentile in samples of size $n=157$, where the paper's own right-tail condition $\sqrt{n}(1-q_{n,y}) \to \infty$ is not met, and examine whether the sup-t bands still achieve nominal coverage.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the structural parameter path $\theta_0(y)$ is identified and estimable pointwise at each threshold by applying conditional maximum likelihood to the binarized outcome $\tilde{y}_{ij,y} = 1\{y_{ij} \le y\}$. Under the logistic link, conditioning on the events that each node in an ordered quadruple has exactly one link present and one absent makes the probability of observing one of the two informative configurations equal to $\Lambda(((x_{ij}-x_{ik})-(x_{lj}-x_{lk}))'\theta_{y,0})$, with fixed effects entirely absent. The paper proves consistency and asymptotic normality for each fixed threshold under sparsity, with rate $(n(n-1)p_{n,y})^{-1/2}$, and its main new result, Theorem 3, gives a joint Gaussian approximation: after each threshold block is normalized by its own score-rate matrix, the coordinatewise studentized estimates are approximately $N(0, P_{n,y})$ with a correlation matrix that may vary with $n$. This delivers sup-t confidence bands that cover the entire coefficient path and a sup-t equality test that controls family-wise error.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, after each threshold block is rescaled by its own rate, the joint covariance of the score vectors stays bounded away from singularity; if the chosen thresholds are so close together that their binarized outcomes almost coincide, this condition fails and the joint inference breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Applied researchers can estimate distributional effects in dyadic data without assuming link probabilities are bounded away from zero or one, so sparse networks and extreme quantiles are no longer out of reach.
  • Simultaneous sup-t bands provide valid joint coverage even when convergence rates differ across thresholds, while pointwise intervals interpreted jointly under-cover.
  • The Wald test of coefficient equality can over-reject as the number of thresholds grows; the sup-t test keeps size near nominal and locates where the differences arise.
  • Ratios of estimated coefficients at a given threshold can be interpreted as ratios of partial derivatives of the conditional quantile function, giving economic objects such as distance-equivalent trade barriers even though fixed effects are not estimated.
  • The framework transfers from trade to other dyadic settings—migration, investment, patent flows—where sparse networks and mass at zero are common.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: when thresholds are chosen adaptively from the data, the requirement that they be separated enough to keep the joint covariance nondegenerate suggests a practical rule—space thresholds so each interval contains a non-negligible fraction of observations—which the paper states as a caution but does not formalize.
  • Beyond the paper: the right-tail estimability condition implies that claims about the very far tail, such as the 99th percentile with hundreds of nodes, should be read as design-dependent; a researcher with about 150 nodes may need to stop at lower quantiles or use a bootstrap calibration to check coverage.
  • Beyond the paper: the ratio interpretation for gravity could be turned into a policy metric, for instance the distance-equivalent value of a visa waiver or a free-trade agreement, a use the paper mentions for migration but does not develop.
  • Beyond the paper: because the estimator discards all non-informative quadruples, it loses efficiency relative to bias correction in dense regions; an open, testable extension is a hybrid that uses bias-corrected estimates in dense parts of the distribution and conditional likelihood in the tails, with a smooth transition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a distribution regression model for directed dyadic networks with two-way fixed effects that vary by threshold. The outcome is binarized at each threshold and estimated by the conditional maximum likelihood estimator of Charbonneau (2017) and Jochmans (2018), which conditions on informative quadruples to eliminate fixed effects. Pointwise asymptotic theory is adapted from Jochmans; the main new contribution is Theorem 3, a joint Gaussian approximation for the studentized estimator across a finite set of thresholds with threshold-specific convergence rates, used to build sup-t simultaneous confidence bands and equality tests. The paper reports Monte Carlo evidence and applies the method to bilateral trade data, finding heterogeneous coefficients across the distribution.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper fills a genuine gap: distribution regression with two-way fixed effects in sparse networks, and joint inference across thresholds with different rates, is a useful extension beyond single-threshold network formation models. The paper is careful to separate pointwise results from the joint approximation and to state assumptions explicitly; the Monte Carlo is calibrated to the application and the proofs are detailed. The main value is the sup-t construction with a correlation matrix allowed to vary with n. However, the central conditioning event in Eq. (4) is internally inconsistent as written, and the joint nondegeneracy assumption is not verified in the empirical grid, so the current version does not support the main claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eq. (4)] The conditioning events are internally inconsistent. Let a=tilde y_ij,y, b=tilde y_ik,y, c=tilde y_lj,y, d=tilde y_lk,y. The stated set {a+b=1, c+d=1, a+d=1} has exactly two solutions, (a,b,c,d)=(1,0,1,0) and (0,1,0,1); in both cases z_sigma=((a-b)-(c-d))/2=0. Hence no quadruple satisfying the stated events is informative, and the conditional probability in Eq. (4) is not the logistic form claimed. Figure 1(a), with a=1,d=1, violates a+d=1. The correct conditioning set should include a column-sum condition such as a+c=1 (equivalently b+d=1), not a+d=1. Because Eq. (5), Lemma 2, the score in Section 3, and all subsequent proofs build on this conditioning, the estimator and all theorems are as yet undefined.
  2. [Section 4.1, Assumption 4.1 and Sections 5-6] The joint nondegeneracy condition is high-level, and the paper itself states that it fails when thresholds are close enough that the binary indicators nearly coincide. In the application, thresholds are empirical quantiles spaced 0.005 apart (Section 6, Table 3, K between 82 and 90), and with n=157 adjacent indicators differ for only about 122 of 24,492 dyads, so the block-normalized score covariance can be very close to singular. No eigenvalue diagnostics for P_n,y are reported in the Monte Carlo or the application. Since Theorem 3(i) and the sup-t critical values in Algorithm 1 rely on a nondegenerate estimated correlation matrix, the empirical bands in Figure 6 and Table 3 are not supported by the stated assumptions. Please either provide primitive conditions on the threshold grid that guarantee Assumption 4.1, or report the empirical eigenvalues of P_n,y and show they are bounded away from zero for all included thresholds.
  3. [Section 3.1 and Section 6] The theory is stated for a fixed finite collection of thresholds y, with the right-tail estimability condition sqrt(n)(1-q_n,y) -> infinity. The application and simulation designs instead use sample empirical quantiles, with thresholds up to tau=0.99; for n=157, sqrt(n)(1-q) is about 0.125 at the 99th percentile, which is far from the divergence required, and the paper provides no finite-sample diagnostics showing that the normal approximation works in this regime. Moreover, empirical quantiles are data-dependent, and the paper does not explain how the fixed-threshold theory applies to them. This affects the pointwise standard errors in the upper tail and the sup-t bands in Table 3. Please either extend the theory to data-dependent thresholds, or make explicit that thresholds are treated as fixed and discuss the finite-sample consequences of the tail condition.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3] The phrase 'asymptotically unbiased' is stronger than what Theorem 2 establishes; the theorem proves consistency and asymptotic normality with a rate depending on p_n,y. Consider using 'consistent' or 'asymptotically unbiased to first order'.
  2. [Section 5.1] The text contains an empty placeholder 'Appendix...' when referring to additional Monte Carlo results; this should be filled in with the relevant appendix or supplemental section.
  3. [Figure 7 caption] The caption should state the units of the vertical axis and define the differencing interval more explicitly (for example, 'theta_n,d(tau) - theta_n,d(tau-0.20)').
  4. [Section 6] The sample size n=157 and the number of dyads (24,492) are central to interpreting K=82-90 in Table 3; consider stating these figures in the main text rather than only in the Supplemental Appendix.
  5. [Algorithm 1] Drawing from Omega_n,d and standardizing is equivalent to drawing from the implied correlation matrix P_n,d; drawing from P_n,d directly would be numerically more stable near singularity and would make the standardization step unnecessary.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: pointwise theory is adapted from Jochmans (2018) with independent proofs, and the joint distribution is derived from primitive score and projection arguments rather than assumed.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. Pointwise consistency and asymptotic normality (Theorems 1-2) are adapted from Jochmans (2018) rather than assumed: the paper restates the estimator of Charbonneau (2017), proves sufficiency (Lemma 1) and the conditional-logit form (Lemma 2) for its quadruple conditioning, and Appendix C carries out the projection, conditional CLT, Hessian, and variance-order steps with explicit rates. The joint result (Theorem 3) is derived in Appendix E from primitive stacked score and projection arguments, with Assumption 4.1 serving as a stated high-level nondegeneracy condition; it is not a restatement of the conclusion, and the correlation matrix is allowed to vary with n rather than being fixed by fiat. The sup-t bands and equality tests are applications of Montiel Olea and Plagborg-Moller (2019) to the Gaussian approximation, so no fitted input is relabeled as a prediction. The Monte Carlo DGP calibrates true parameters to MLE estimates from the trade data, but this calibration is an evaluation device and does not enter the theoretical claims. Concerns that Assumption 4.1 may fail for 0.005-spaced thresholds with n=157 are about the realism of the maintained assumptions, not about circularity; no load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theoretical estimator has no fitted free parameters: the fixed effects are eliminated by conditioning and the structural coefficients are the estimands. The load-bearing assumptions are the logistic error structure, additive separability of the fixed effects, and the high-level sparsity and nondegeneracy conditions (Assumptions 3.4, 3.6, 4.1). No new entities are postulated. The Monte Carlo DGP is calibrated to MLE estimates from trade data, but that calibration is not part of the theoretical claim.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The link function Lambda is the logistic CDF (Equation 1).
    Essential for sufficiency of row and column sums (Lemma 1) and for the closed-form conditional likelihood in Lemma 2; the paper states it is the only link for which conditioning entirely removes the fixed effects.
  • domain assumption The errors epsilon_ij,y are i.i.d. Logistic(0,1) across dyads at each threshold, independent of covariates and fixed effects, with cross-threshold dependence allowed.
    This supplies the conditional independence across dyads used throughout the proofs and the parametric form of the binarized outcome probabilities.
  • domain assumption The fixed effects enter additively as alpha_i,y + gamma_j,y and can vary freely across thresholds.
    Additive separability is what allows the quadruple conditioning to difference out both sender and receiver effects; it rules out interactive or nonseparable unobserved heterogeneity.
  • domain assumption Assumption 3.1: the n nodes are sampled independently.
    Standard network sampling condition; it does not impose independence across dyads sharing a node.
  • domain assumption Assumption 3.4: n p_{n,y} -> infinity and the normalized expected Hessian has full rank.
    This is the identification condition that permits sparse sequences and defines the estimable threshold range; it is not derived from primitive conditions.
  • ad hoc to paper Assumptions 3.6 and 4.1: eigenvalue floors on the dyad-clustered score outer-product and its block-normalized joint version.
    High-level nondegeneracy conditions needed for pointwise and joint CLTs; no primitive sufficient conditions are given, and Assumption 4.1 can fail for close thresholds.
  • standard math Assumptions 3.2, 3.3 and 3.5: compact parameter space and bounded second and sixth moments of covariates.
    Standard regularity conditions for M-estimator consistency and the Lyapunov-type CLT arguments.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Pairwise Differencing Distribution Regression Approach for Network Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HY6QVUGJ

@misc{pith2026260804983,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Pairwise Differencing Distribution Regression Approach for Network Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HY6QVUGJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04983}
}
read the original abstract

I develop an estimation and inference framework for distribution regression in dyadic network settings with two-way fixed effects that vary across thresholds of the outcome. I show that identification of the structural parameters is achieved through binarization of the outcome at each threshold, and estimate the model by conditional maximum likelihood, which "differences out" the fixed effects and circumvents the incidental parameter problem. The estimator remains asymptotically unbiased under sparsity, whether from the network structure or binarization at extreme thresholds. The second novelty is to establish the joint asymptotic distribution of the estimators across multiple thresholds with different convergence rates, and to develop simultaneous confidence bands and tests for equality of coefficients across thresholds. Monte Carlo simulations confirm small bias, valid inference, and correct simultaneous coverage under sparsity. An application to bilateral trade finds that coefficients vary substantially across the distribution, with equality rejected for key trade barriers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04983 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Informative quadruple configurations with {i,l} as senders and {j,k} as receivers. Blue solid arrows: links [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Examples of non-informative quadruple configurations with {i,l} as senders and {j,k} as receivers. In (a), all [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two types of sparsity in distribution regression, for an outcome bounded below at zero, under mild (left) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (20 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mean bias (top) and median bias (bottom) of the bias-corrected estimator (BC) and the conditional maximum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: RMSE (top) and rejection frequency of the two-sided [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution regression estimates of the effect of log distance and legal system on bilateral trade. Solid blue: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Differences θn,d(τ ) − θn,d(τ − 0.20) from the CMLE estimator for log distance and legal system. Shaded region and dashed lines show the 95% simultaneous sup-t confidence band and pointwise confidence intervals for the differences, respectively. The horizontal dashed l…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: All 12 informative quadruple configurations for nodes {i,j,k,l}. Blue solid arrows: links present ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Average probability Pr(˜yij,k = 1) at each threshold yk in the empirically calibrated DGP. Dashed lines indicate reference levels at 5%, 50%, and 95%. Thresholds correspond to empirical quantiles in [0.545, 0.990] at intervals of 0.005. (a) Border (b) Language (c) Reli…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Mean bias of the bias-corrected estimator (BC) and the conditional maximum likelihood estimator (CMLE) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p113_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Median bias of the bias-corrected estimator (BC) and the conditional maximum likelihood estimator (CMLE) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p113_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: RMSE for the bias-corrected estimator (BC) and the conditional maximum likelihood estimator (CMLE) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p114_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Rejection frequency of the two-sided t-test at the 5% nominal level for the bias-corrected estimator (BC) and the conditional maximum likelihood estimator (CMLE) across quantiles of the trade distribution, based on 500 replications using the empirically calibrated DGP…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: True coefficient paths from empirical trade data with equally spaced threshold selection ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p121_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: True coefficient paths from empirical trade data with equally spaced threshold selection ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p122_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: True coefficient paths from empirical trade data with First [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p123_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: True coefficient paths from empirical trade data with First [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p124_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Distribution regression estimates of the effect of remaining covariates on bilateral trade. Solid blue: CMLE; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p125_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Distribution regression estimates of the effect of all covariates on bilateral trade. Solid blue: CMLE; dotted red: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p126_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Pointwise comparison of CMLE, BC, and MLE estimates with 95% pointwise confidence intervals for all [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p127_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Pointwise comparison of CMLE, BC, and MLE estimates with 95% pointwise confidence intervals for all [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p128_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Differences θn,d(τ ) − θn,d(τ − 0.20) from the CMLE estimator for log distance and legal system. Shaded region and dashed lines show the 95% simultaneous sup-t confidence band and pointwise confidence intervals for the differences, respectively. The horizontal dashed …
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Differences θn,d(τ ) − θn,d(τ − 0.20) from the CMLE estimator for log distance and legal system. Shaded region and dashed lines show the 95% simultaneous sup-t confidence band and pointwise confidence intervals for the differences, respectively. The horizontal dashed …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

202 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Shaping the World Economy; Suggestions for an International Economic Policy , author =

  2. [2]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle , author=. American Economic Review , volume=

  3. [3]

    Probability Theory and Related Fields , volume =

    Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and Kato, Kengo , title =. Probability Theory and Related Fields , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  4. [4]

    Journal of Political Economy , volume=

    Production networks, geography, and firm performance , author=. Journal of Political Economy , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  5. [5]

    Journal of Political Economy , volume=

    The origins of firm heterogeneity: A production network approach , author=. Journal of Political Economy , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  6. [6]

    Journal of Economic Perspectives , volume=

    From micro to macro via production networks , author=. Journal of Economic Perspectives , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  7. [7]

    Functional Differencing in Networks , author=. Revue. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  8. [8]

    Review of International Economics , volume=

    Quantile Gravity: Economic Integration Agreements, Least Traded Goods, and Less Developed Economies , author=. Review of International Economics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

Show all 202 references
  1. [10]

    Available at SSRN 2988698 , year=

    Semiparametric estimation in network formation models with homophily and degree heterogeneity , author=. Available at SSRN 2988698 , year=

  2. [11]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    A jackknife bias correction for nonlinear network data models with fixed effects , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  3. [12]

    Econometrica , pages=

    Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models , author=. Econometrica , pages=. 1982 , publisher=

    1982

  4. [13]

    2025 , school=

    Essays on Econometrics: Sparsity, Duration, and Binomial Panel Data Models , author=. 2025 , school=

    2025

  5. [16]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Bounds on parameters in panel dynamic discrete choice models , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  6. [17]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Average and quantile effects in nonseparable panel models , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  7. [19]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Uniform inference for kernel density estimators with dyadic data , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  8. [20]

    The Annals of Statistics , volume=

    Empirical process results for exchangeable arrays , author=. The Annals of Statistics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  9. [21]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , pages=

    Identification of average marginal effects in fixed effects dynamic discrete choice models , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , pages=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  10. [22]

    2025 , institution=

    Identification and estimation of average causal effects in fixed effects logit models , author=. 2025 , institution=

    2025

  11. [23]

    2024 , institution=

    Identification of Dynamic Panel Logit Models with Fixed Effects , author=. 2024 , institution=

    2024

  12. [27]

    Empirical Economics , volume=

    Estimation of structural gravity quantile regression models , author=. Empirical Economics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  13. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10814 , year=

    Distribution Regression with Censored Selection , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10814 , year=

    arXiv

  14. [29]

    Journal of Political Economy , volume=

    Distribution regression with sample selection and uk wage decomposition , author=. Journal of Political Economy , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  15. [30]

    2005 , publisher=

    Testing statistical hypotheses , author=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  16. [31]

    The Annals of Statistics , pages=

    Asymptotics in directed exponential random graph models with an increasing bi-degree sequence , author=. The Annals of Statistics , pages=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  17. [32]

    Journal of International Economics , pages=

    The tails of gravity: Using expectiles to quantify the trade-margins effects of economic integration agreements , author=. Journal of International Economics , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  18. [33]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Exact and approximate stepdown methods for multiple hypothesis testing , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  19. [34]

    Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=

    Simultaneous confidence bands: Theory, implementation, and an application to SVARs , author=. Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  20. [35]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Efficient minimum distance estimation with multiple rates of convergence , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  21. [36]

    Quantitative Economics , volume=

    Fixed-effects binary choice models with three or more periods , author=. Quantitative Economics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  22. [37]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  23. [38]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Sample selection as a specification error , author=. Econometrica , volume=

  24. [39]

    The Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    The log of gravity , author=. The Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  25. [40]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Individual and time effects in nonlinear panel models with large N, T , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  26. [41]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    Two-way models for gravity , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  27. [42]

    Journal of econometrics , volume=

    Multiplicative-error models with sample selection , author=. Journal of econometrics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  28. [43]

    The American economic review , volume=

    A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation , author=. The American economic review , volume=. 1979 , publisher=

    1979

  29. [44]

    Cambridge Working Papers in Economics , year=

    Modified-likelihood estimation of fixed-effect models for dyadic data , author=. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics , year=

  30. [45]

    Econometrica , pages=

    Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations , author=. Econometrica , pages=. 1948 , publisher=

    1948

  31. [46]

    The Econometrics Journal , volume=

    Multiple fixed effects in binary response panel data models , author=. The Econometrics Journal , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  32. [47]

    Econometric Society Monographs , volume=

    Understanding bias in nonlinear panel models: Some recent developments , author=. Econometric Society Monographs , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  33. [48]

    Handbook of econometrics , volume=

    Panel data models: some recent developments , author=. Handbook of econometrics , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  34. [49]

    Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=

    Generalized econometric models with selectivity , author=. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=. 1983 , publisher=

    1983

  35. [50]

    Journal of political economy , volume=

    Increasing returns and economic geography , author=. Journal of political economy , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  36. [51]

    Econometrica , volume=

    An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  37. [52]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    An empirical model of dyadic link formation in a network with unobserved heterogeneity , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  38. [53]

    2016 , publisher=

    Estimating fixed effects logit models with large panel data , author=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  39. [54]

    The robustness of conditional logit for binary response panel data models with serial correlation , author=. August. US Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Paper , volume=

  40. [55]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Semiparametric analysis of network formation , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  41. [56]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Semiparametric estimation of censored selection models with a nonparametric selection mechanism , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  42. [57]

    Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=

    Estimation of a panel data sample selection model , author=. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  43. [58]

    The Econometric Analysis of Network Data , pages=

    Dyadic regression , author=. The Econometric Analysis of Network Data , pages=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  44. [59]

    Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests

    Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. , author=. 1960 , publisher=

    1960

  45. [60]

    Working Papers 431, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali

    Partial effects estimation for fixed-effects logit panel data models , author=. Working Papers 431, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali. , year=

  46. [61]

    Available at SSRN 3074193 , year=

    Estimating Fixed Effects: Perfect Prediction and Bias in Binary Response Panel Models, with an Application to the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program , author=. Available at SSRN 3074193 , year=

  47. [62]

    Cambridge: Cambridge , volume=

    Qualitative and limited dependent variable models in econometrics , author=. Cambridge: Cambridge , volume=

  48. [63]

    Advances in econometrics: Fifth world congress , volume=

    Kernel estimators of regression functions , author=. Advances in econometrics: Fifth world congress , volume=. 1987 , organization=

    1987

  49. [64]

    2009 , publisher=

    Approximation theorems of mathematical statistics , author=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  50. [65]

    Breakthroughs in statistics , pages=

    A class of statistics with asymptotically normal distribution , author=. Breakthroughs in statistics , pages=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  51. [66]

    Duke Mathematical Journal , volume=

    The central limit theorem for dependent random variables , author=. Duke Mathematical Journal , volume=. 1948 , publisher=

    1948

  52. [67]

    Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics , volume=

    Conditional independence, conditional mixing and conditional association , author=. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  53. [68]

    Annals of Statistics , volume=

    Subsampling bootstrap of count features of networks , author=. Annals of Statistics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  54. [69]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5647 , year=

    Nonlinear panel models with interactive effects , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5647 , year=

    arXiv

  55. [70]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Inference in linear regression models with many covariates and heteroscedasticity , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  56. [71]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    Estimation and inference for linear models with two-way fixed effects and sparsely matched data , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  57. [72]

    Network Science , volume=

    Diffusion and contagion in networks with heterogeneous agents and homophily , author=. Network Science , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  58. [73]

    2000 , publisher=

    Asymptotic statistics , author=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  59. [74]

    2019 , institution=

    Network data , author=. 2019 , institution=

    2019

  60. [75]

    2016 , institution=

    Lecture 1: Conditionally-independent dyad models , author=. 2016 , institution=

    2016

  61. [76]

    Probability and Game Theory, Papers in Honor of David Blackwell, Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes-Monograph Series , volume=

    U-statistics , author=. Probability and Game Theory, Papers in Honor of David Blackwell, Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes-Monograph Series , volume=

  62. [77]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Inference with dyadic data: Asymptotic behavior of the dyadic-robust t-statistic , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  63. [78]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Fixed-Effect Regressions on Network Data , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  64. [79]

    ArXiv eprints, New York University , year=

    Bootstrap with cluster-dependence in two or more dimensions , author=. ArXiv eprints, New York University , year=

  65. [80]

    Semiparametric estimation of bivariate latent variable models , author=

  66. [81]

    Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=

    Semiparametric analysis of random effects linear models from binary panel data , author=. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=. 1987 , publisher=

    1987

  67. [82]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Pairwise difference estimators of censored and truncated regression models , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  68. [83]

    Pairwise difference estimators for nonlinear models , author=

  69. [84]

    The Econometrics Journal , volume=

    Simpler bootstrap estimation of the asymptotic variance of U-statistic-based estimators , author=. The Econometrics Journal , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  70. [85]

    2020 , publisher=

    Three Essays on Unobserved Heterogeneity in Panel and Network Data Models , author=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  71. [86]

    Nonparametric and semiparametric methods in econometrics and statistics , pages=

    Distribution-free estimator of a regression model with sample selectivity , author=. Nonparametric and semiparametric methods in econometrics and statistics , pages=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  72. [87]

    Nonparametric and semiparametric methods in econometrics and statistics , volume=

    Semiparametric estimation of a regression model with sample selectivity , author=. Nonparametric and semiparametric methods in econometrics and statistics , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  73. [88]

    The Econometrics Journal , volume=

    Two-step series estimation of sample selection models , author=. The Econometrics Journal , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  74. [89]

    Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=

    Distribution-free maximum likelihood estimator of the binary choice model , author=. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=. 1983 , publisher=

    1983

  75. [90]

    Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=

    An efficient semiparametric estimator for binary response models , author=. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  76. [91]

    Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=

    Semiparametric estimation of index coefficients , author=. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pages=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  77. [92]

    1986 , publisher=

    Semiparametric estimation of weighted average derivatives , author=. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  78. [93]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Non-parametric analysis of a generalized regression model: the maximum rank correlation estimator , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 1987 , publisher=

    1987

  79. [94]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Network and panel quantile effects via distribution regression , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  80. [95]

    The Annals of Probability , pages=

    Some limit theorems for empirical processes , author=. The Annals of Probability , pages=. 1984 , publisher=

    1984

  81. [96]

    Stochastic Processes and their Applications , volume=

    Empirical and multiplier bootstraps for suprema of empirical processes of increasing complexity, and related Gaussian couplings , author=. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  82. [97]

    Journal of Multivariate Analysis , volume=

    Quantile regression for longitudinal data , author=. Journal of Multivariate Analysis , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  83. [98]

    Economics Letters , volume=

    The incidental parameter problem in a non-differentiable panel data model , author=. Economics Letters , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  84. [99]

    2015 , institution=

    Quantile regression with panel data , author=. 2015 , institution=

    2015

  85. [100]

    Duke University , year=

    A semiparametric network formation model with multiple linear fixed effects , author=. Duke University , year=

  86. [101]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Nonparametric identification in index models of link formation , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  87. [102]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Statistical inference in a directed network model with covariates , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  88. [103]

    Annual Review of Economics , volume=

    Econometric models of network formation , author=. Annual Review of Economics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  89. [104]

    quantile regression , author=

    Distributional vs. quantile regression , author=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  90. [105]

    Journal of political Economy , volume=

    Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill , author=. Journal of political Economy , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  91. [106]

    1995 , publisher=

    Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973-1992: A semiparametric approach , author=. 1995 , publisher=

    1973

  92. [107]

    Handbook of labor economics , volume=

    Decomposition methods in economics , author=. Handbook of labor economics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  93. [108]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    The conditional distribution of excess returns: An empirical analysis , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  94. [109]

    Essays in econometrics , author=

  95. [110]

    Department of Economics, Princeton University , year=

    Identification and estimation of network models with nonparametric unobserved heterogeneity , author=. Department of Economics, Princeton University , year=

  96. [112]

    2020 , institution=

    Sparse network asymptotics for logistic regression , author=. 2020 , institution=

    2020

  97. [113]

    Computational statistics & data analysis , volume=

    On estimating conditional quantiles and distribution functions , author=. Computational statistics & data analysis , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  98. [114]

    Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics , volume=

    Trading partners and trading volumes: implementing the Helpman--Melitz--Rubinstein model empirically , author=. Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  99. [115]

    Applied Economics , volume=

    Estimating gravity equation models in the presence of sample selection and heteroscedasticity , author=. Applied Economics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  100. [116]

    2008 , publisher=

    Estimating the gravity model when zero trade flows are frequent , author=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  101. [117]

    Available at SSRN 2398292 , year=

    Panel data gravity models of international trade , author=. Available at SSRN 2398292 , year=

  102. [118]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Jackknife and analytical bias reduction for nonlinear panel models , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  103. [119]

    The Review of Economic Studies , volume=

    Split-panel jackknife estimation of fixed-effect models , author=. The Review of Economic Studies , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  104. [120]

    Journal of Development Economics , volume=

    The formation of risk sharing networks , author=. Journal of Development Economics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  105. [121]

    Science , volume=

    The diffusion of microfinance , author=. Science , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  106. [122]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    New trade models, same old gains? , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  107. [123]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    New trade models, new welfare implications , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  108. [124]

    The Economic Journal , volume=

    Gravity and heterogeneous trade cost elasticities , author=. The Economic Journal , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  109. [125]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Inference on counterfactual distributions , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  110. [126]

    2023 , institution=

    Firm export dynamics in interdependent markets , author=. 2023 , institution=

    2023

  111. [127]

    Econometrica , volume=

    A distributional framework for matched employer employee data , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  112. [128]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Binary response models for panel data: Identification and information , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  113. [129]

    volume 4 of Handbook of Econometrics , author=

    Chapter 36 large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. volume 4 of Handbook of Econometrics , author=. Elsevier , volume=

  114. [130]

    European economic review , volume=

    Does a currency union affect trade? The time-series evidence , author=. European economic review , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  115. [131]

    Economic policy , volume=

    One money, one market: the effect of common currencies on trade , author=. Economic policy , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  116. [132]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Quantile regression for dynamic panel data with fixed effects , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  117. [133]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Quantile regression with censoring and endogeneity , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  118. [134]

    Journal of International Economics , volume=

    From micro to macro: Demand, supply, and heterogeneity in the trade elasticity , author=. Journal of International Economics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  119. [135]

    The Economic Journal , volume=

    Gravity without apology: the science of elasticities, distance and trade , author=. The Economic Journal , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  120. [136]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    The effects of birth inputs on birthweight: evidence from quantile estimation on panel data , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  121. [137]

    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , volume=

    A panel data model for subjective information on household income growth , author=. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  122. [138]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society , volume=

    Consistent estimation of the fixed effects ordered logit model , author=. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  123. [139]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    Estimation in the fixed-effects ordered logit model , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  124. [140]

    Annual Review of Economics , volume=

    The gravity model , author=. Annual Review of Economics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  125. [141]

    The World Economy , volume=

    A practitioners’ guide to gravity models of international migration , author=. The World Economy , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  126. [142]

    Journal of Development Economics , volume=

    Income maximization and the selection and sorting of international migrants , author=. Journal of Development Economics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  127. [143]

    Journal of International Economics , volume=

    International trade without CES: Estimating translog gravity , author=. Journal of International Economics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  128. [144]

    Migration Studies , volume=

    The effect of income and immigration policies on international migration , author=. Migration Studies , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  129. [145]

    Abrevaya, J. and C. M. Dahl (2008): The effects of birth inputs on birthweight: evidence from quantile estimation on panel data, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 26, 379--397

    2008

  130. [146]

    Aguirregabiria, V. and J. M. Carro (2024): Identification of average marginal effects in fixed effects dynamic discrete choice models, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1--46

    2024

  131. [147]

    Castro-Vincenzi, S

    Alfaro-Urena, A., J. Castro-Vincenzi, S. Fanelli, and E. Morales (2023): Firm export dynamics in interdependent markets, Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research

    2023

  132. [148]

    Anderson, J. E. (2011): The gravity model, Annual Review of Economics, 3, 133--160

    2011

  133. [149]

    Anderson, J. E. and E. Van Wincoop (2003): Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle, American Economic Review, 93, 170--192

    2003

  134. [150]

    Arellano, M. and B. Honor \'e (2001): Panel data models: some recent developments, in Handbook of econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 5, 3229--3296

    2001

  135. [151]

    Costinot, and A

    Arkolakis, C., A. Costinot, and A. Rodr \' guez-Clare (2012): New trade models, same old gains? American Economic Review, 102, 94--130

    2012

  136. [152]

    Baetschmann, G., K. E. Staub, and R. Winkelmann (2015): Consistent estimation of the fixed effects ordered logit model, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 178, 685--703

    2015

  137. [153]

    Baltagi, B. H. and P. Egger (2016): Estimation of structural gravity quantile regression models, Empirical Economics, 50, 5--15

    2016

  138. [154]

    Mayer, and M

    Bas, M., T. Mayer, and M. Thoenig (2017): From micro to macro: Demand, supply, and heterogeneity in the trade elasticity, Journal of International Economics, 108, 1--19

    2017

  139. [155]

    Bertoli, and J

    Beine, M., S. Bertoli, and J. Fern \'a ndez-Huertas Moraga (2016): A practitioners’ guide to gravity models of international migration, The World Economy, 39, 496--512

    2016

  140. [156]

    Bergstrand, J. H. and M. W. Clance (2025): Quantile Gravity: Economic Integration Agreements, Least Traded Goods, and Less Developed Economies, Review of International Economics, 33, 951--987

    2025

  141. [157]

    Bergstrand, J. H., M. W. Clance, and J. S. Silva (2025): The tails of gravity: Using expectiles to quantify the trade-margins effects of economic integration agreements, Journal of International Economics, 104145

    2025

  142. [158]

    Bernard, A. B., E. Dhyne, G. Magerman, K. Manova, and A. Moxnes (2022): The origins of firm heterogeneity: A production network approach, Journal of Political Economy, 130, 1765--1804

    2022

  143. [159]

    Bonhomme, S. and K. Dano (2024): Functional Differencing in Networks, Revue \'e conomique , 75, 147--175

    2024

  144. [160]

    Lamadon, and E

    Bonhomme, S., T. Lamadon, and E. Manresa (2019): A distributional framework for matched employer employee data, Econometrica, 87, 699--739

    2019

  145. [161]

    Loh, and C

    Botosaru, I., I. Loh, and C. Muris (2024): An adversarial approach to identification, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04239

    2024 arXiv

  146. [162]

    Candelaria, L. E. (2020): A semiparametric network formation model with unobserved linear heterogeneity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.05403

    2020 arXiv

  147. [163]

    Mr \'a zov \'a , and J

    Carr \`e re, C., M. Mr \'a zov \'a , and J. P. Neary (2020): Gravity without apology: the science of elasticities, distance and trade, The Economic Journal, 130, 880--910

    2020

  148. [164]

    Cattaneo, M. D., Y. Feng, and W. G. Underwood (2024): Uniform inference for kernel density estimators with dyadic data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 119, 2695--2708

    2024

  149. [165]

    (2010): Binary response models for panel data: Identification and information, Econometrica, 78, 159--168

    Chamberlain, G. (2010): Binary response models for panel data: Identification and information, Econometrica, 78, 159--168

    2010

  150. [166]

    Charbonneau, K. B. (2017): Multiple fixed effects in binary response panel data models, The Econometrics Journal, 20, S1--S13

    2017

  151. [167]

    Chetverikov, and K

    Chernozhukov, V., D. Chetverikov, and K. Kato (2015): Comparison and Anti-Concentration Bounds for Maxima of G aussian Random Vectors, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 162, 47--70

    2015

  152. [168]

    Fern \'a ndez-Val, J

    Chernozhukov, V., I. Fern \'a ndez-Val, J. Hahn, and W. Newey (2013 a ): Average and quantile effects in nonseparable panel models, Econometrica, 81, 535--580

    2013

  153. [169]

    Fern \'a ndez-Val, and B

    Chernozhukov, V., I. Fern \'a ndez-Val, and B. Melly (2013 b ): Inference on counterfactual distributions, Econometrica, 81, 2205--2268

    2013

  154. [170]

    Fernandez-Val, and M

    Chernozhukov, V., I. Fernandez-Val, and M. Weidner (2024): Network and panel quantile effects via distribution regression, Journal of Econometrics, 240, 105009

    2024

  155. [171]

    Dano, K., B. E. Honor \'e , and M. Weidner (2025): Binary choice logit models with general fixed effects for panel and network data, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.11556

    2025 arXiv

  156. [172]

    Das, M. and A. Van Soest (1999): A panel data model for subjective information on household income growth, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 40, 409--426

    1999

  157. [173]

    D'Haultf uille, and L

    Davezies, L., X. D'Haultf uille, and L. Laage (2025): Identification and estimation of average causal effects in fixed effects logit models, Tech. rep., Center for Research in Economics and Statistics

    2025

  158. [174]

    D'Haultf uille, and M

    Davezies, L., X. D'Haultf uille, and M. Mugnier (2023): Fixed-effects binary choice models with three or more periods, Quantitative Economics, 14, 1105--1132

    2023

  159. [175]

    D’Haultf uille, and Y

    Davezies, L., X. D’Haultf uille, and Y. Guyonvarch (2021): Empirical process results for exchangeable arrays, The Annals of Statistics, 49, 845--862

    2021

  160. [176]

    Dobronyi, C., J. Gu, T. M. Russell, et al. (2024): Identification of Dynamic Panel Logit Models with Fixed Effects, Tech. rep., arXiv. org

    2024

  161. [177]

    (2019): An empirical model of dyadic link formation in a network with unobserved heterogeneity, Review of Economics and Statistics, 101, 763--776

    Dzemski, A. (2019): An empirical model of dyadic link formation in a network with unobserved heterogeneity, Review of Economics and Statistics, 101, 763--776

    2019

  162. [178]

    Fafchamps, M. and F. Gubert (2007): The formation of risk sharing networks, Journal of Development Economics, 83, 326--350

    2007

  163. [179]

    Fern \'a ndez-Val, I. and M. Weidner (2016): Individual and time effects in nonlinear panel models with large N, T, Journal of Econometrics, 192, 291--312

    2016

  164. [180]

    Foresi, S. and F. Peracchi (1995): The conditional distribution of excess returns: An empirical analysis, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 451--466

    1995

  165. [181]

    Gao, W. Y. (2020): Nonparametric identification in index models of link formation, Journal of Econometrics, 215, 399--413

    2020

  166. [182]

    Graham, B. S. (2017): An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity, Econometrica, 85, 1033--1063

    2017

  167. [183]

    --- -.1pt --- -.1pt --- (2020): Dyadic regression, in The Econometric Analysis of Network Data, Elsevier, 23--40

    2020

  168. [184]

    Grogger, J. and G. H. Hanson (2011): Income maximization and the selection and sorting of international migrants, Journal of Development Economics, 95, 42--57

    2011

  169. [185]

    Melitz, and Y

    Helpman, E., M. Melitz, and Y. Rubinstein (2008): Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 441--487

    2008

  170. [186]

    Honor \'e , B. E. and E. Tamer (2006): Bounds on parameters in panel dynamic discrete choice models, Econometrica, 74, 611--629

    2006

  171. [187]

    Hughes, D. W. (2026): A jackknife bias correction for nonlinear network data models with fixed effects, Journal of Econometrics, 253, 106130

    2026

  172. [188]

    (2018): Semiparametric analysis of network formation, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 36, 705--713

    Jochmans, K. (2018): Semiparametric analysis of network formation, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 36, 705--713

    2018

  173. [189]

    (1997): Estimation of a panel data sample selection model, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1335--1364

    Kyriazidou, E. (1997): Estimation of a panel data sample selection model, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1335--1364

    1997

  174. [190]

    Melitz, M. J. and S. J. Redding (2015): New trade models, new welfare implications, American Economic Review, 105, 1105--1146

    2015

  175. [191]

    Montiel Olea, J. L. and M. Plagborg-M ller (2019): Simultaneous confidence bands: Theory, implementation, and an application to SVARs, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 34, 1--17

    2019

  176. [192]

    (2017): Estimation in the fixed-effects ordered logit model, Review of Economics and Statistics, 99, 465--477

    Muris, C. (2017): Estimation in the fixed-effects ordered logit model, Review of Economics and Statistics, 99, 465--477

    2017

  177. [193]

    Muris, C. and C. Pakel (2025): Triadic network formation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.26420

    2025

  178. [194]

    Pakel, and Q

    Muris, C., C. Pakel, and Q. Zhang (2025): Dyadic data with ordered outcome variables, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.16689

    2025 arXiv

  179. [195]

    Newey, W. K. and D. McFadden (1994): Chapter 36 large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. volume 4 of Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 12, 2111--2245

    1994

  180. [196]

    Neyman, J. and E. L. Scott (1948): Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations, Econometrica, 1--32

    1948

  181. [197]

    (2013): International trade without CES: Estimating translog gravity, Journal of International Economics, 89, 271--282

    Novy, D. (2013): International trade without CES: Estimating translog gravity, Journal of International Economics, 89, 271--282

    2013

  182. [198]

    Ortega, F. and G. Peri (2013): The effect of income and immigration policies on international migration, Migration Studies, 1, 47--74

    2013

  183. [199]

    Pakel, C. and M. Weidner (2023): Bounds on average effects in discrete choice panel data models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.09299

    2023

  184. [200]

    Rao, B. P. (2009): Conditional independence, conditional mixing and conditional association, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 61, 441--460

    2009

  185. [201]

    (1960): Studies in mathematical psychology: I

    Rasch, G. (1960): Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests., Nielsen & Lydiche

    1960

  186. [202]

    Roelsgaard, S. T. (2025): Essays on Econometrics: Sparsity, Duration, and Binomial Panel Data Models, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University

    2025

  187. [203]

    (2024): Dyadic Regression with Sample Selection, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17787

    Sakamoto, K. (2024): Dyadic Regression with Sample Selection, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17787

    2024

  188. [204]

    Serfling, R. J. (2009): Approximation theorems of mathematical statistics, vol. 162, John Wiley & Sons

    2009

  189. [205]

    Silva, J. S. and S. Tenreyro (2006): The log of gravity, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641--658

    2006

  190. [206]

    (2017): Semiparametric estimation in network formation models with homophily and degree heterogeneity, Available at SSRN 2988698

    Toth, P. (2017): Semiparametric estimation in network formation models with homophily and degree heterogeneity, Available at SSRN 2988698

    2017

  191. [207]

    Van der Vaart, A. W. (2000): Asymptotic statistics, vol. 3, Cambridge university press

    2000

  192. [208]

    (1982): Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models, Econometrica, 1--25

    White, H. (1982): Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models, Econometrica, 1--25

    1982

  193. [209]

    Jiang, S

    Yan, T., B. Jiang, S. E. Fienberg, and C. Leng (2019): Statistical inference in a directed network model with covariates, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 114, 857--868

    2019

  194. [210]

    (2026): Identification and estimation of network models with nonparametric unobserved heterogeneity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06885

    Zeleneev, A. (2026): Identification and estimation of network models with nonparametric unobserved heterogeneity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06885

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.